美國大選賀錦麗情況佔優！但其意識型態與共產主義相差無幾！到底到最後誰會取勝？《蕭若元：蕭氏新聞台》2024-08-17
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 11 ก.ย. 2024
- 2024北美網聚
報名詳情: forms.gle/yv3U...
查詢:YYshiuhk@gmail.com
用謎米香港優惠連結，購買NordVPN兩年計劃，原本額外再送4個月
nordvpn.com/memehk
🐱俏貓貓超市網站由此入：qfoodsmall.com/
香港元宇宙youtube 頻道： / @hongkongmetas
💥你爆料我來講Email，歡迎來信爆料：connectionhknews@gmail.com
🐱蕭貓貓辦館最新團購上線！歡迎來逛逛：shiumeowmeow.co
關注🇭🇰《香港新聞連線》追蹤最需要知道的消息
網址：news.hongkongm...
➡️【如何將香港新聞連線加入首頁？】影片連結： • 隨時都能看香港新聞連線！教你如何將網站加入首...
關注：Twitter: @hkStephenSYY / IG: hkStephenSYY
加入我們的patreon： / mrshiu
![โฮ่ง! (SUGOI) - LYKN [ OFFICIAL MV ]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/nFp4zjAARFs/mqdefault.jpg)
加州已經有板你睇，我住加州首府，夠膽死在商店區和民居付近建立一個比遊民入住的貨櫃屋，目測最小有三十個，我朋友在旁邊開店，己經頭痛死😢
蕭生對美國大選的看法真的有坐井觀天的味道！
Trump ❤🇱🇷👍
加州選民最「清楚」賀錦麗的背景、歷史、和政績。
爭在是否同意，還是有意忘記，還是有意不理會？
且看今次加州選民投票結果！
加州還是民主黨大胜。看一下過去几年有多少公司，加州人搬到德州？传统民主黨区达拉斯的黑人市長看势头不對，宣布脱离民主黨
So many illegal migrants vote in CA. Dems win for sure!!!
The video that I watched, he always said "some" of these people, where is the video that show him said all 2 million people is from prison and mental hospital? Show us the video with full context?
Mr Shiu got it wrong.
Here in the news: "Trump has used dehumanizing terminology to describe immigrants in the U.S. illegally, calling them "animals" when talking about alleged criminal acts, and saying they are "poisoning the blood of our country," a phrase that has drawn criticism as xenophobic and echoing Nazi rhetoric. In response to the criticism, Trump has said he had no idea that German dictator Adolf Hitler had used similar language.
www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-focuses-migrants-crime-here-is-what-research-shows-2024-04-11/
He got news from legacy media 😂
Idiotic remarks
Siu took it literally. ! Trump actually meant US can not let people come in illegal, those people are unfiltered, with no record. Very dangerous to US.
Trump didn't say it, but media fake headlines do.
老蕭的心態就係：’ 就算選左賀錦麗都冇事嫁，佢咁左，過唔到參眾兩院ga. 不過佢一定幫烏克蘭同台灣，快D投佢啦。‘ 頂！你明知個人侯選人所有政策都係問題，仲要選佢？為左你認為的正義要保住烏同台(Trump冇話唔做），要成個美國攬炒，癲線！
右派部分喺美國孤立主義 但大部分右派唔會對🇺🇦🇹🇼不理不保 Trump 在為四年 無惡人敢郁。做強美國 惡人投鼠忌器。
我上一次係其他人post都有reply過：老蕭之前同曹總做節目我都已經想爆佢。佢講到好似2011-2017年這段時間，Newsom(副州長）施政冇賀綿麗(首席檢察官)影子。頂，佢哋做左7年同事！係這段時間，佢哋負責處理刑事司法改革、醫療保健和教育問題。 入面個‘漸進的刑事司法改革’簡稱坐少D監同唔洗坐監就係佢地度出嚟. 教育佢哋兩個重點提出Equity and Access. 尤其賀綿麗講明要特別洗多啲錢去支助少數族裔學校同HBCUs. 同埋大力係學校執行反欺凌法。我表弟個同學就因為笑同學係基，俾學校勸佢退學。老蕭你係真唔知定假唔知？🤔 好，今日你講佢的總統政策同以前有乜嘢分別？意識形態同施政更左！最讓我覺得佢會在醫療政策上不懷好意就係佢好大機會會通過撥款補貼某些藥物或者免費提供某些藥物，繼而獲取醫藥公司的支持。佢同Newsom一向都同加洲的醫藥公司關係都係”起級好”。如果俾佢地勾結左醫藥公司，醫藥公司會唔會係AI醫療管制上面更多say? 醫療藥品壟斷會唔會更嚴重？
@@katherinewong5730全完同意你的意见。老萧以前还说过，川普是世界上最伟大的总统，现在因为听说他不支持台湾，因为他住在台湾，就马上反转矛头，人性啊，自私自利！
燒生用心良苦，發輝餘熱，出盡V8 Twin Turbo 燈死驢行黨。🤭
你有妄想症？ 蕭老有講嗎
賀錦麗的選舉經費還差很多，這點可証明受歡迎程度不高，而且一開始時還要市民捐款支持．美國的民調很容易造假的
這不正是可以較少受大金主左右而犧牲小巿民利益嗎
Trump 同賀錦麗咁多年嘅公績處事大家都知，特別賀錦麗獨特嘅政策真係咁受歡迎？而蕭生又覺得佢嘅政策過唔到兩院，點解仲要支持佢上去做dummy？Trump 有心有能力，雖然佢多嘢講，但唔係應該睇佢做咗乜嘢咩？Trump 係歡迎移民架，只係非法難民要識別才可以，咁都唔啱？要柝咗度門任入？任何國家都有難民，但唔係政府為咗某種原因，打開大門任由進入，咁會影響社會同人民生活亦唔公平，一個負責任嘅政府唔應該容許嘅！唔通美國人鍾意？所以賀錦麗民調咁高？否則賀錦麗從未表現到有個別鮮明政策為國民所喜愛，對而家美國嘅墮落，佢呢啲選舉政策寫出嚟已經最好，可以做到幾多？做晒有用嗎？啲民調真係咁有參考價值？我對賀錦麗做咗候選人咁耐完全冇改觀，Trump 一定贏架👍
如果再出一條片話支持哈里斯，即刻取消patreon訂閲
坐井觀天!!!
大選占優？如果只看 ABC, NBC, MSN, CBS, CNN, NewsWeek, NYT, Washington Post... 大幅领先 😂
Even Trump's favourite Fox also broadcast the same polling results.
是否占優：看民調样本是哪個地方出來，可以參考美國分選區的地图。過去几年，有多少公司，加州人搬過來德州？德州两党候選人初選，共和黨各級候選人的票数是民主黨人的几倍，和4年前比改变很明显@@leanderrowe2800
可以參考埋賭博網站賠率，都係賀錦麗領先
You already said it yourself, majority of the news organizations' polls indicated H is leading. Is there any particular reason why you have to be blind? In case you are a friend of Fox, they were the only organization that needed to pay US$800 million for broadcasting falsehoods about the election as rigged. Fool you once , shame on them; fool you twice, shame on you!!!
@@jerryke8823 参考拉森幕斯的民調比較可靠。
先講一下更容易清淅理解共和黨，民主黨两個经济政策的區別和影響：美國两個最大的经济實体州 民主黨統治的加州和共和黨占多數的德州，两個州都和墨西哥邊界。德州气油價今天3元，加州近 5元，加州的房價是德州的3倍以上，加州有州收入稅，德州沒有州收入稅，加州的人工收入高過德州，但卻沒有高過 50%：結果過去几年一大批加州公司，几十萬加州人搬去德州落戶
更正一下，两州人均收入差約 25%
我哋選總統，又唔係選男友或契爷，點解在意侵侵嘅說話。三歲定80，要侵侵改变自己說話方式就係難為佢。只要侵侵政策對美國人及世界和平有利，我堅定投票俾侵侵❤❤❤
你在美國?
世界和平😂😂😂😂😂
侵係美國優先…和平
在民主黨紐約州住了三十多年，公民二十五年從未投過票。祗是非常投八政策上，要看的是投黨重要很多，在民主國家，一個人是不可能做到很多事在四年裏，不能否定大咀巴言行一致做他想完成的，不是空泛開腔，但說真的他真不是蕭生所堅決他所講的對非法移民針對說法，我也希望蕭生能將他的片段放出來好譲我們理解他的前文下句，那就不會誤導中立理性一羣。説真話民主黨這四年政策真的有點失望😞害怕的l 賀真的太卡通了，怎麼辦呢？還是給大咀巴四年過度。也許有搖攞鐘的效果，無選擇中的選擇，可悲的，也是四年後的安排。但此刻最重要的是不要用謠傳加上太多主觀性的方式播導，不實是一個可敬主持人。謝謝🙏
By the way, I noticed that you mentioned always buying growth stocks over value stocks. Yet, you also believe Warren Buffett is right-who happens to be a long-term value investor and is famously cautious about tech stocks. So, is Apple (AAPL) still considered a growth stock, or has it now become just a "boring" value stock?
In fact, IMHO, different strategies should be employed to match the characteristics of various stages in a market cycle. However, this is just my perspective, and I haven’t spent time analyzing the validity or methodologies for qualitatively defining these market stages.
Your example is flawed. Providing free food only to those who cannot afford it is "fair equity". On the other hand, giving free food to anyone who requests it without any approval process is equality. Corruption often arises from "fair equity," as it involves granting someone the power to decide who qualifies for food and basic survival-this discretion can lead to abuses of power.
I believe that "power" corrupts people. The more concentrated power a society has, the more widespread corruption it will likely experience. In fact, this is why many socialist and communist countries experience significant corruption (I hope you don't consider this statement as lying, unfair, or racist). Worse still, because social relationships grow exponentially with population, the impact of a corrupt system becomes more severe in larger countries. As the population increases, people are exposed to more instances of injustice from multiple individuals in positions of power.
O圆購物之母
蕭生，想唔到你扭曲事實，違背良知，最新真正拉斯穆森民調結果剛出嚟，也許你唔識英文，不可以怪你，繼續欺騙你聽眾智商🎉🎉🎉
基本蕭生視頻 我都加 👍 雖然明白蕭生驚美國孤立主義 不團結盟國 不盡力幫🇺🇦🇹🇼 但我不擔心 美國孤立主義亦會阻止中俄 如簫生經常講：抗中喺🇺🇸兩黨民意大多數共識；老蕭著實太驚 右派孤立主義 而不經意違背自己推崇的批判性思考判斷方式 貶川揚賀 😅
拉斯穆森民調一向偏共和黨.
Don’t care about polling. Many of them are “oversampled” or “used methods to favor one party’.
Just vote in Nov and hope it is too big to rig!
不久將成為總統女士. 毫無疑問. 聰明, 意志堅強, 知識淵博, 有魅力, 謙虛, 專業和奉獻. 我們需要的領導者. 她關心的是國家和人民; 不像那些只關心自己的人!
应该问为什么现在乃是副总统的她不能够现在就实行这些政策？因为太迟了？过去三年八个月做了什么…现在说我赢了怎样怎样…典型说谎
閣下胡言亂語，跟本不懂政治！😡🐯
閣下胡言亂語，根本不懂政治！😡🐯
@@juancheung 怎么？伤了你那玻璃心？你懂政治？你现在是什么政治职位？香港政府Keyboard Warrior?
你不了解美國體制，副總統只是作為總統發生意外或任何其他原因導致不能處理國事時，才能接替總統，只是一個好比後備球員角色（備胎），只要總統健在，副總統對總統施政及日常國家運作是無權過問，憲法不賦予副總統任何干涉政策的權力
@@chanjack7945 真是好笑，你不能告诉你的政党这些伟大政策让你的党更伟大？你不如说把责任甩给下议院上议院不通过不是更好？
真希望萧先生的节目都能配上中文字幕啊。当然了那样的工作量太大，萧先生应该没有时间。所以，就只能遗憾，不知道具体讲的是什么😅。另外萧先生是不中意简化字的，但我还是用简化字留言，表示来自大陆（虽然我是先写繁体字，上小学后才拿铅笔写简化字的”异类“）。总之，我很喜欢萧先生。支持您！
In other words, Harris' policy is toward socialist or communist.
如果她当选将是美国没落的开始，天佑美利坚。🙏
The US has been falling for decade(s). If she wins (by cheating), it just goes to hell in “fast motion”!
誰當選都是美国没落的开始.
乾隆之後，中國没落的开始，誰也阻不了.
美利坚是你爹 ?
希望今次不會再用上上次的舊方法，先製造人為統計結果，再用上大量郵寄選票。謹記要先查清楚哪個用郵寄選票的選民早已死去。
老siu宜家先識分equality 同equity
我早已不听他胡说八道了，就是来看留言大家是怎么骂他的
I only blame on the people who don’t have “critical thinking”.
If Harris is elected, the country may not be savable. It is going to be self destruction.
Equating equity to communism is a real stretch. Equity promotes to have everyone to start from the same basis. Whether they can achieve the same results depends on their own efforts. For instance putting more resources to less advantaged schools in low income areas. That’s equity.
Well said.
You have critical thinking and I can tell that you are well educated.
But how do you ensure those additional funding have verifiable measurement on the improvement planned or expected? Can’t just assume more money will generate the improvement in the badly needed segments. To enable those under privileged to improve by achieving a fair starting point is the only meaningful essence.
Look up Kamala's video, she said "Equitable treatment means we *all* end up at the same place.” while showing two people standing side by side on a mountain top. She's clearly referring to "the same results".
And in your example, remember that more money for one school means less money for another school. How would you like it if this extra money is taken from your kid's school?
Equity also means Affirmative Action for university admission: to offer less qualified applicant with admission based on color, not applicants with strong academic & leadership qualities.
賀賣牙膏最啱！😚😚😚😚😚😚😚😚😂😂
白藜蘆醇啊，蕭山成日講錯
選佢同拜登無分別，只係奧巴馬同克林頓等嘅扯線公仔
奧巴馬同克林頓背後都係被一班財閥影響，直接d講，無論邊個做總統，都係受一眾具有影響力既財閥控制，美國就係一個資本主義國家，基礎就係由一班財閥係背後資助政黨同政府，所以唔會走社會主義同共產主義，最終都一定係為美國整體利益同價值觀施政
Mr Siu Is getting more and more opinionated as he ages. Sigh 😢
The Biden administration has tightened the path for legal immigration while seemingly ignoring or even misleading the public about the ongoing issues at the border. New York City, once proud to be a sanctuary city, is now pulling back due to the financial burden-$5 billion last year alone. In contrast, Texas and Florida have spent only $140 million to bus migrants across states. I fully support legal immigration, even if it operates on a lottery system, as long as we can keep it organized. Also, we could ease the definition of a criminal record by automatically expunging offenses committed before age 18 or more than five years ago.
So, STOP mixing people between legal and illegal border crossing, and further confuse the issues. Because, you are 100% wrong about the specific, and provide no evidence at all. If you need research material, try "New York Post", a New York City local news paper with long history.
"The Biden administration has tightened the path for legal immigration" This is not true, the number of immigrant visa issued is definitely more than Trump, under Trump, he issued 450k+ fewer PR visa than Obama, and 2m+ fewer nonimmigrant visa than Obama. Under Biden, it's more or less Obama level. For example, in FY 2023, the state department issued 1.2 million PR visas, and more than 10.4 million nonimmigrant visas, the most since 2015. Compared to the number under Trump at the same period , in FY 2019, the US granted 577k PR visa, and 8.7 million nonimmigrant visas.
唔明點解YT食咗我條評論. 但講拜登政府收緊合法移民途徑絕對係錯誤. 根據CATO, Trump任內同Obama比, 只講前3.5年, PR簽證減少咗近50萬, 非移民簽證減少好似係2千萬有多. 而拜登期間, 開始由於COVID, 簽證審批係較慢. 但之後係大幅上升. 根據國務院, 移民簽證類, FY 2019, 批46.2萬, FY 2020 24萬, FY 2021 28.5萬, FY 2022 49.3萬, FY 2023 56.2萬. 非移民簽證, FY 2019, 8.7M, FY 2020, 4M, FY 2021 2.79M, FY 2022 6.8M, FY 2023 10.4M,
Based on their actions in the past 3 1/2 years, it's hard not to conclude that all this was *intentional*.
美國對一般公民的醫療保障從來不夠。美國對人民的醫療照顧從來不如英國，我有家人要長期食藥，這藥在美國買要貴幾倍，不能負擔，而在英國起碼能負擔。
你們知道嗎？在美國，如果你工作的公司沒有提供醫保，你基本沒有醫療保障，且還要看你公司的醫保cover多少？記得之前的菏里活編劇罷工嗎？他們其中一個原因是工資和工時問題令到他們不夠資格有公司醫保。我有朋友在十多年前撞車，因為冇買醫保，只能送公立醫院而非最近的私立醫院，失救而死。
根據美國EMTALA法律規定，任何醫院都不能拒收緊急病患，私人醫院亦只有等病患情況穩定之後先可以轉送佢地去公立醫院🥸
America is the only western nation that doesn't have a national healthcare system. It's about time that EVERY American, rich or poor, employed or unemployed, young and old, including the homeless, should be taken care of when they are sick.
全國最具代表性Rasmussen民調16號向3000選民抽樣调查，結果Trump以46%对kamala45%反超Kamala 1%。烏雞的蜜月期已經結束之前的大幅上升領先只不過是興奮劑。
I have been travelling US 2 weeks for a business trip! I saw the economy is slowing down, spending is much lesser, inflation is very obvious!!!
I travel to China every week. I saw the whole economy breakdown. Huge amount of ppl lost their job.
Conclusion for 2 weeks? Why don’t you look at the financial index. The inflation went down below 3, Dows keep going up under Joe Biden. I am just telling you the facts, not my subjective personal feelings. I am living in US more than 2 decades.
You are a worse liar than Trump. The observable difference in all the changes you mentioned (inflation, economic growth, etc.) within 2 weeks is close to zero.
何来的钱建这么多屋？是加纳税人的税？300万套房？钱何来？加税
其多次言论都指向追求结果平等，这是不可能实现的，会造成各种混乱。
這是為了迎合美國年輕人左傾思潮既話術，選票要緊，上左台再算，美國不是一個人說了算的國家，憲法對總統太多制衡，結果還是會把美國調整回正確的道路上
請問蕭生何為“共產主義？哈里斯又如何與之相差無幾呢？😂
哈里斯主張結果平等,而不是機會平等. 而且會實施蘇聯式價格管制政策
@@wongtony6560 蘇聯式價格管制政策主要有兩種：一種是列寧的戰時管制政策，一種是斯大林的計劃經濟政策，兩種都不是馬克思的原教旨社會主義，更不是共產主義。哈里斯的政策比起歐洲的左派，離伯恩斯坦和考茨基的修正主義相差太遠了。我以為應叫美国民主黨為新左派，他們不反對市場配置資源，但也加強政府的調節手段；他們通過政府的引導，協助新興產業，協助基建重建；他們特別強調加強和保護美國中產階級，減少兩極分化造成的社會成本。民主黨的政策在加州已取得了一定的進展，獲得年青人的支持，讓他們看到了未來和向上的希望！哈里斯的政策有不切實際的成份，有選舉造勢的成份，“但其意識型態與共產主義相差無幾”的結論過於主觀和武斷。
WTF. You are her advisor. She rejects all the interviews. How do you know what she means!
I am 99.99% sure she does not even know what she means!
真係有驚 Trump Trump 輸，當見這個恐怖女人
大部分非法移民都係經濟難民，但有的是靠呢啲非法移民搵食嘅律師，所以大都成功留低。 希望侵今次在加州嬴
In NYC, Chinatown, us$8K per head for straightforward cases eg overstayers entering with visas. Just heard it from one who got a 工card and immediately got job at hair salon. She came with her daughters. Husband is a kitchen hand. Lives in Flushing. They came from China with some savings to invest in this way of getting green card thru paid legal help.
加拿大算唔算喺共產主義/社會主義? 美國再"左"都唔會"左"得過加拿大! 而且國會有強大嘅阻力!
I live in Canada and we have a National Healthcare that takes care of everyone, rich or poor, employed or unemployed, young and old. It's about time that America should take care of it's citizens (everyone) on Healthcare.
@@leanderrowe2800The healthcare in Canada is a joke. People wait for “long time” to see a doctor. He/she may not have the “time” to wait.
@@PO-nb8qc
I live in Canada from being a student, immigrant, citizen, worked, married and had children. We have had many sickness, surgeries, big and small, we never had problem with waiting. Of course if the surgery is minor and not life threatening, you can't expect to have it tomorrow. The longest we had to wait for a non-life threatening surgery was three weeks. I have no problem with that since it's not life threatening and I was not in pain. My sister's family doctor found out she had stage 4 cancer and the tumor blocked her larynx and she couldn't talk. She had surgery on the SAME night.
@@leanderrowe2800It is based on the Canadians. Maybe it is different in your cities (less density) or they are all lairs.
唔該蕭生講英文後再翻譯中文，因為你說啲英文好多都聽唔明，謝謝你！
如果聞鼠组做一界美國及個世界都变成咁!!!重可以做多一界。物價飛升，中下階層生活非常艱難。那西方世界D仁聞個腦想乜，有個什麼好系統，你都不用再有希望!亦等第2次2008，如果5~6年內2次QE，世界在亂象中…
選邊個做總統 實行乜政策 基本上都係美國人嘅事
邊個做總統，外交有不同，對世界有影響。
你知道學校是教什麼為什麼Elon Mask 自家教子女
一句講曬，繼續不斷印美金。加大政府財政，加大稅收。
民主黨走的係社會主義,但亦己經非常接近共產主模式!
至於過去民主黨執政三年多有千多萬非法拉丁美洲難民湧入美國是誰的責任!🈶️👀睇是”敗燈”政府所做成的惡果!
亦都係副總統Harris 的失職和失敗至做成今天非法難民到處攪事做成社會秩序混亂!
Harris 是應該負起全責處理不當讓大量非法難民湧入美國🇺🇸境內!
美國其中一樣要去中國化既條件，就係要將工業生產搬回美國本地生產，需要既就係低技術廉價勞動力，試問美國本地人有幾多人願意從事低技術又低工資既藍領工作呢？美國移民政策吸引既目標都係有技術或者有學識既人，佢地點會做美國低層既工作，而美國低層既工作都要有人做，結果美國政策從來隻眼開隻眼閉容許非法移民入境美國，就係正正為了利用呢班人去填補美國低層既勞動力，美國本地人係資本主義下享受慣左，做唔到辛勞又低下層既工作（當然都有少數本地人肯做，但唔係大多數人願意），多數都係靠d移民去做，我諗呢個移民問題係民主共和黨最終都係處理手法差唔多，唔可能完全封禁非法移民既
According to the UNHCR, refugees should have stayed in Mexico, as it can be considered a "safe third country" under UNHCR guidelines. As a signatory to UNHCR agreements, Mexico is expected to organize and accept these asylum seekers.
The American people have already contributed significantly to global efforts, including increased spending during economic downturns and providing aid during international conflicts. For example, NATO's involvement during the Iraq War was limited. According to CBP, there were approximately 10 million illegal border crossings recorded in the last 10 years, and this is only people got caught and recorded. Many of these border crosser remain in the US illegally (the action of staying in the US without valid document is staying illegally, which is a fact and not a matter of opinion) When can we get a break?
120种不同笑法的傻笑姑婆😂
蕭生以前支持當勞侵，而家似乎左轉了。
Trump 唔支持 Ukraine 和台灣, 你叫蕭生點樣支持得佢落呀 ！
I think it's better to take the equity development path, and finally make everyone succeed. I think it's better to provide more assistance to those in need, so as to demonstrate the significance of freedom.
市場可以失效 出現壟斷行為 例如超市集團實行price gouging 即使係支持市場經濟嘅 都唔會反對政府管制 所以有competition policy 事實上 市場經常失效 跟你係左派右派無關 問題係干頑時有冇更嚴重嘅government failure
左派烏托邦
問題係美國年輕人有左傾思想，為左爭取呢班選民焗住都要扮左，但係總統都唔係一個人話事，最後都係要以美國利益為重
🙏🙏🙏
You arexwrong Mr Sir.
Most of the grocery stores in the north America have been monopolized . You don't live here, so how could you say we don't need it .
This is what government is for. To avoid monopolization
Just because you don’t hear what you want to hear doesn’t mean others wrong. More regulation means more bureaucracy won’t bring price down. That’s common sense.
Can you name a grocery store that has a monopoly?
Walmart and Costco, for example, have < 3% net profit margin and rely on volume. What kind of monopoly has such low margins?
佢嘅政策只是偏向社會主義，暫時未到共產思想
法國
主要係因為宜家美國年輕人居然開始有社會主義思潮，可能係受共產黨海外文宣影響，變相令民主黨都要關心呢班選民既意見，搞到美國有時要講下d左傾立場，爭取選票，當然到上任之後，佢會唔會真係左傾又係另一回事，美國體制永遠都係以自身利益為首要，讓美國永遠偉大
近100年,和平時期實施價格管制的有什麼國家?
IN GOD WE TRUST !
GOD BLESS MR DONALD TRUMP !
特郎普, 的确系女人嘅克星
Yeah! 快啲選佢，共產全球，笑星救台灣🎉，我買咗好多花生等睇全球共產，我打算唔做嘢，等政府幫我多啲去reach 到同有錢人一樣，我唔知點解要努力，決定躺平
蕭生:你應該報道下英国現時暴亂，関于英國放狗咬示威者既睇法！
there was once mega-psychological experiment, and now there is experiment on free market going on. let's see what will happen.
🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
謝謝蕭生分享👍👍👍👍👍👍
就民生而言，限制大基金垄断当地楼市利大于弊！
作为民主党的候选人，Kamala 当然比较照顾低下階层，不过在三权分立的架扣下，她也要与國會讨价還价才能成事！ 不必太担心她的想法！ 再说她也难以成为强势的总统如Ronald Reagan!
There is a difference between social democrat and communist. Harris’s policy is more aligned with a social democrat which is popular in Western European, Canada and other places. Trump has no better label for Harris than Communist.
Yes, Britain too, where 蕭生's family are enjoying benefits that Harris is proposing to Americans. I live in Canada, Canadian enjoy many benefits that Americans don't have. That doesn't make us, or Britain, Europe, Australia, New Zealand communist.
Communist or not, democrats’ policies basically come down to this: taking what’s yours and giving it to others. If you’re on the receiving end, it’s indeed awesome. Who doesn’t like freebies on someone else’s dime?
其實睇今屆拜登響俄烏戰爭嘅手影，就知道Democrats根本唔介意，甚至想大陸打台灣，然後用所謂後勤支援來拖死大陸，就好似佢而家耗死俄羅斯咁。至於阿Trump善出口術牽制各國領導，如果佢選到，台灣反而較安全。
好嘢，同我地住房不炒
壓低物價方法應該增加競爭
但Trump主張加關稅, 就係會減少競爭. 而且, 美國market, 特別係食物market, 係越來越集中. 4大食品供應商供應美國60%以上.
@@brucel7430 經濟學的理論只要有利可圖就會有人參与經營，除非有政府干預如專利權，進口稅當然影響國外競爭對手，但國內還是有對手
哄抬物价是看看市场是否有垄断嫌疑。这个是维持自由市场。反过来，定价过低，低于成本，也可能是垄断嫌疑，这个肯定在美国是违法。
Go, Harris, go, go !🎉🎊🇺🇸
講乜咩？
😳🙄🤔
the bird.......
每次出片都賣廣告，你是收人錢睇片呀😢😢😢
美國通貨膨漲係由貨幣利率來調控，而利率係由聯儲局決定，總統及國庫部長耶倫都不能直接干預。吾明點解啲人將通漲嘅責任歸入總統身上。
發政府債券 (印錢) 是联邦政府，預算支出，稅收是联邦政府，联储制定基准利率，政府債券利率實际利率由市場定，卖不出怎办？联储接收。
即係迫銀行放貸給不合乎資格人士
系能源吖
民主黨四年執政間，美國國內通貨膨脹，即證明政府在這段期間沒有用權力去打壓企業；聯邦政府致力打擊的是大企業的壟斷市場行為，即以往有ATT 電話公司，微軟公司及現在谷歌公司。醫藥方面，美國藥物之貴是舉世皆知，有國民到加拿大購藥，有國民到墨西哥就醫，若非當年 民主黨Obama總統的推行（之前 Clinton 總統也有類似計劃，不過被共和黨檔下。），則恐怕仍有很多市民因醫療費高昂而造成健康問題。房屋方面，美國部分地區的確有財團以現金支付方式去購買、屯積房地產的情況，再加上全球各地的熱錢流入市場，確實造成想置物業作自住用的買家造成沈重負擔。Biden 總統執政期間，面對新冠疫情，整個美國社會以至全球各國都面對著經濟危機，美國又是第一經濟大國，全球都期待美國可以帶動經濟復甦；雖然「量化寬鬆」帶來了通脹，但卻可以在兩三年將經濟回復增長。此外，Biden 重新將世界盟友拉攏回來，再次拱固全球軍事力量以對付那些流氓政權。（好可惜，多半美國人不太關心國際政治，不去理解總統的作為。）凡此一切都是 Joe Biden 這幾間的政積。
我不相信也不認為美國將會走向共產主義，但在社會福利政策上，會更加走向社會主義；美國人認同資本主義，不仇富，認為只要有能力和努力都可以發達致富，而政府亦不會阻止人有錢，反正是富人養窮人，中產養自己，低收入者，坐巴士地鐵半價，家中網路費有津貼，有糧食津貼等，這一切都是社會主義福利的施政。
系洪都拉斯吧
What a British running dog!
免保䆁即捕即放拉嚟把鬼。零元購免拉政鋼既吸引到她的選民界支持，又能關倒零售商鋪令網購財團得益。 加州就是例子。
這些groceries根本就是迷惑大眾的東西，這些東西本身就很便宜，就算升價一倍，又花得多幾多啊？其他的耐用品由於生產力過剩很難有大幅度漲價，housing是最大的問題。
Siu is a fan of Trump. Certified because he truly supports Harris.
in the US we used to have social etiquette that three topics are better to keep private as they are deeply subjective and personal: religion, politics, music. Let's stick to facts regarding politics and take emotion out of the equation. First is immigration, both parties did nothing to actually reform the the immigration systems which asides from a small amount of H1 visas, most legal immigrations are based on family link not skillset. Illegal migrants pay a huge role in American labor force, if you ever been to farms, construction sites, restaurant kitchens, meat/fishery processing plants, you will find 90% are migrants workers. Without them American economy simply cannot function. Considering America is going through re-industrialization as globalization is coming to end , we will need more migrants not less. Do you know whom was the last president provided amnesty to illegal migrants? Ronald Reagan in 1986 to 3 millions illegal residents. It is puzzling to see Trump did not reform the systems during the 1st two years with both house and Senate under Republican control. Regarding his 'build the wall' promise, how many miles of new wall did he actually built? ~80 miles (based on US Border Protection data) or 4% of 1954 miles of US- Mexico border. So based on these facts, migrants are again the scapegoat for anything wrong with America that politicians like to explore with the disfranchised. It happened over and over again in the past 200years, from when German came over, then the dirty Catholic whites from Ireland and Italy, then the greedy Jews and slanted eyes Chinese. Second is economy, in the past 60 years only two presidents:Johnson and Clinton, both Democrats, ran a budget surplus. The rest failed, in fact it was Reagan that turned US from the world biggest creditor to debtor. And with all the complaints about Dems run states like Cali, NY, MA, NJ,... let's not talk about cities as city simply is not a complete economic entity, both Dems and Republicans have successful and failure example. Another to gauge is looking at which states are the biggest contributors to and most dependent on federal budget. The biggest contributors are Cali(Dem), NY(Dem), Texas(Rep), Florida(Rep), IL(Dem), NJ(Dem). the most dependent on Federal support states 7 out of 10 are Republicans, too miserable to mention names... Next time, we can talk about foreign policy. Focus on wider facts,not just our own personal experience will help guide our votes and national policy better.
Harris should take the credits she let around 20M migrants just a year to come to the states to help the economy (Without them, the economy simply can’t function) Why does she deny she was border czar?
She should take credits she let around 20M migrants in a year to come to the states to support the economy (Without them, the economy simply could not function). Why does she deny it?
She should tell us her policy is to let (more) migrants to come to US after she is elected. It is good for the country. I am looking forward to hearing it.
@@PO-nb8qc Your math simply does not add up. 20M a year, that is 1.66M a month. Where did you get your figure? I don't care about Harris or Trump, I am talking about facts.
thanks
一千美元一針
如果賀錦麗的政策左到要說是共產主義，歐洲有很多國家政策更左，他們有自由的問題嗎？沒有！他們的經濟發展也還不錯呢！美國加州州政府長年政策都左頃，但加州是世界是第五大經濟體。美國密西西比州長期都是共和黨執政，但他們的發展都是乏善足陳！
不如講吓何錦麗實際嘅政策。價格控制合理嗎？放曬啲非法移民入嚟合理嗎？拜登同何錦麗任期都未完國債已經增加咗八萬億，咁樣使錢法合理嗎？
先講一下更容易清淅理解共和黨，民主黨两個经济政策的區別和影響：美國两個最大的经济實体州 民主黨統治的加州和共和黨占多數的德州，两個州都和墨西哥邊界。德州气油價今天3元，加州近 5元，加州的房價是德州的3倍以上，加州有州收入稅，德州沒有州收入稅，加州的人工收入高過德州，但卻沒有高過 50%：結果過去几年一大批加州公司，几十萬加州人搬去德州落戶
I live in Canada, we have national healthcare, we have free access to abortion, we do not discriminate LGBTQ, we have strict gun control, we ban semi-automatic assault style weapons, we have a TRUE separation of religion and state. In fact, Europe, Britain, Australia, New Zealand and many other free democratic developed nations are like us. Kamala Harris is just trying to catch up with the rest of the developed world. America has a lot of catching up to do. Vote Kamala Harris to bring America forward, not back 50 years when woman and minorities had no rights.
@@jerryke8823 這是一個偽命題！美國是一個動態國家，公司跨州搬遷每天都在發生，這真的反映德州政府在政策上的優勢嗎？人才流向才是重點，公司的軀殼可以搬到天崖海角，但技術靈魂是那群有著創意的人才。有些公司只象徵式搬了總部去德州，但關鍵性的技術性員工仍留在加州和華盛頓州，也有些公司搬走了，那群人才卻留下來自己創業。是的，德州生活指數整體來說低於加州，但人才去向的選擇不單只是看房價和氣油價錢，工作上的交際網絡，公司的價值觀，居住地區的環保，父母會不會希望下一代在德州這個保守的環境長大 etc. 都會是他們的考量。以 Tesla 和 Oracle 為例，他們的總部搬了到德州，但他們真正設計和運作的地方在德州嗎？而且他們新總部的位置都是在德州少數民主黨在掌政的地區- 奧斯丁Austin ，如果他們真的對民主黨的政策那麼抗拒，應該在德州選擇一個共和黨的大紅區才對！
搬過來的是包括不同行業，你用的例子是科技公司，附便举個例子，全球500大公司之一，Charles Schwab 搬到West Lake, 就是你说的大红，Toyota 美國总部在 Plano, 也是紅區 @@香港夢
侵受好多鐵粉！賀錦麗冇乜鐵粉其實呢一點你都冇乜留意到😂
隨口噏啫，競選承諾講下就得，美國唔係獨裁政府，不是做了總統就可以說了算
佢要爭取左傾思想既年輕選民支持姐，到佢做總統唔係佢說了選，美國總統權力有限
今日賀錦麗被紐約時報插
冇眼睇。
討好選民？
Mr Siu, 可搜邏一些台灣苦茶油來港賣嗎？因這些油霧煙點比較高，適合煎，炒，炸食物嘅。
龔小霞說呿是靠下半身上位，希望呿當選下半身為老人服紛呀😂😂😂😂
60yo now!
Thank's for your support
MAY KANALA BE THE ANTI CHRIST OF THE PROPHECY !
😂😂😂😂😂
錯！
Prices for premium milk and orange juices have gone up in the 3 years from $3.5 to $6.5. These products are domestic products and increase in minimum wage should have little impact on it. This is clearly due to price gouging. Mr. Shiu is a business man. Almost all of them are greedy merchants. I can understand why he does not agree with Harris on her proposal to counter price gouging.
美國父母都有生BB的假期
委內瑞拉起南美，佢哋要經咁多個中美洲國家同埋麥西哥先去到美國。
海路要經波多尼各、多明尼加、牙賈加、海地、古巴、巴哈馬群島等等中美海島國先去到美國邁阿密，做乜偏偏美國要收呀？你知唔知自己噏乜呀？
好似波多尼各係美國屬土喔，如果在嗰度拿到身份就無必要再到美國本土
@@yewilson2007 去到邊度都好，只要佢係解除咗當前威脅，就應該先留低由當地收容。當地可以向聯合國要錢支援收容難民。咁先至係難民。
不論美國、英國、德國嘅「難民」，都係一班I come to spend your money嘅來享受免費生活同福利，又或者搵大錢寄返鄉下嘅亡命之徒。
我認為蕭生真係要起呢方面收一收佢把衰口。
連Fox都係話賀錦麗搖擺州民調反先 唔通fox又係左膠媒體?
好心班侵粉啦 民調領先緊就話真 落後緊就話假 可唔可以反智少陣當幫忙?
個人黎講我就鍾意侵侵多過美國楊千嬅 政策就一半一半 但呢班侵粉真係好令人作嘔
成班侵粉只要一出嚟辯論只會不堪一擊，不過侵今年個政治取態高明左好多，尤其是中彈後出嚟辯論果次，直接講結論，侵會贏，民調可能係為股市服務
Fox 係民主黨支持者，係人都知！
有x貿辦行政經理同x子學院，侵侵一定輸。