Full MikroTik MTCNA - QOS (Simple Queues, Bursting, Schedule, Packet Marks)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 42

  • @robertjohnston1920
    @robertjohnston1920 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I watched some of your videos before obtaining my 4 mikrotik certs. The teacher I had was not as good as you. Amazing style of teaching

    • @TheNetworkBerg
      @TheNetworkBerg  3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Wow, thank you! I really appreciate this nice feedback!

    • @robertjohnston1920
      @robertjohnston1920 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@TheNetworkBerg I want to say thank you for your hard work on these. Mikrotiks are just immensely fun and your videos capture that really well. What I love most is command line. I think its great to for you to show the winbox way. I also suggest sometimes maybe disable the thing(s) and show how to create command(s) that work the same. Thank you again dude

    • @Jorvs
      @Jorvs 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      May I ask do they have pure online classses? For certification?

    • @robertjohnston1920
      @robertjohnston1920 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Jorvs Unfortunately I think they are all in person seminar type classes

    • @Jorvs
      @Jorvs 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@robertjohnston1920 that's gonna be imposible on my part hahaha thanks for the info...

  • @christiaansteenkamp5617
    @christiaansteenkamp5617 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    This is quality content.

  • @tonyalbert8107
    @tonyalbert8107 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This was well put together and very informative to someone new to Mikrotik devices. Thank you!

  • @eduannaude8301
    @eduannaude8301 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    New to mikrotik. I learn so much from your videos. Thank you

    • @TheNetworkBerg
      @TheNetworkBerg  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You are welcome! I hope I can continue to help you with your learning journey and MikroTik :D!

  • @NervousNab
    @NervousNab 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I've created queue to prioritize cs 2 tcp packets thanks to you. Thanks :)

  • @ap5672
    @ap5672 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    12:53 correct me if I am wrong, as I understand it "limit at" is not the upper limit but lower limit. It is the minimum bandwidth guaranteed to a client (as long as the pipe is not saturated).

    • @aspected
      @aspected 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The way I read it is "start limiting at", you're right

  • @Heinzeis
    @Heinzeis 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Dankie vir die Videos, ek leer baie by jou. Uit Bloemfontein.

  • @sakisproto9995
    @sakisproto9995 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great video!

  • @spikmahlophe2891
    @spikmahlophe2891 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    MWEB??? Johannesburg??? Whaaaaaaaat??? Been Following your channel for the longest of time, Great Channel By the Way, and never once did i ever think that you might be right here in Johannesburg!

    • @TheNetworkBerg
      @TheNetworkBerg  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The world is an extremely small place :P

    • @spikmahlophe2891
      @spikmahlophe2891 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@TheNetworkBerg Do you do Wisp Consulting? We have a dedicated leased line 100/100 DFA. Mikrotik RB2011. under 50 subs. and so far we could safely say the network is functional. But could be more secure, resilient and better!

  • @zdbtv
    @zdbtv 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice Video Sir

  • @marcinas3396
    @marcinas3396 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    thx a lot... It was my problem since many months ;)

  • @TheNetworkBerg
    @TheNetworkBerg  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Burst Calculation:
    wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:Queues_-_Burst

  • @DimitriPappas
    @DimitriPappas 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Assuming the second rule was also prerouting and with the same dst-address, wouldn't it have the same effect as using forward? (at least, for qos purposes?) Forward does seem to be the more intuitive choice, but unlike the distinction with input/output/forward filter chains which was easier to grasp, I sometimes still struggle figuring out when to use prerouting vs forward/input (or even postrouting) when it comes to mangling, so I just try each one (in descending order of what seems to make the most sense) until it works, lol. Also can postrouting packets be marked for QoS or should it all be done prerouting? I'm guessing postrouting marking doesn't make sense because the packets have already been sent out to an interface..? XD

  • @PeerMahaar
    @PeerMahaar 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi
    Could you please tell about TH-cam marking rule like this busting perpos

  • @guilhermegeek7198
    @guilhermegeek7198 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you very much! Does it work on local dst???

  • @biki1973
    @biki1973 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    from what i learned 'limit at' is guaranteed bandwidth for the queue.

  • @eisamohammadzadeh105
    @eisamohammadzadeh105 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have a dhcp that I want to limit bandwidth in mikrotik. I want to make sure that users can use all the bandwidth when they start downloading, but then, for example, they are limited to a certain speed after 10 seconds. How can I do this?

    • @MrBatouska
      @MrBatouska 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      As i saw in the video you must use the burst. If you want to limit the users @10M down/up and at the begining you want them to have full speed for a while put at the queue burst 100M @down/up and the threshold put 20 or 15.

  • @meinsda5983
    @meinsda5983 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Do you have a good script for VoIP telephonie?

  • @schulteheimhotel7165
    @schulteheimhotel7165 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi Bro how can I contact you ?

  • @cna_academy9225
    @cna_academy9225 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi dear can i used the simple queue for entire network not only client

    • @aspected
      @aspected 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      As far as I remember, you can set Target to an interface (or bridge), interface list, or IP range to use the queue on multiple devices

  • @carlb641
    @carlb641 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Does simple queue have overhead? When I use it it deducts about 50mbps from what I set in the limit, tried different firmware but still doing the same.

    • @TheNetworkBerg
      @TheNetworkBerg  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      The queue is managed by the CPU of the router, so the CPU could be a potential bottleneck. Make sure this is not capping on something or that you do not have tons of firewall rules running to shape bandwidth.

  • @Mi_Fa_Volare
    @Mi_Fa_Volare 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    How do I get around the fasttrack?

    • @TheNetworkBerg
      @TheNetworkBerg  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Either by disabling it completely or being very specific with the traffic you want to fasttrack. So if you know you want to do queues on specific protocols like HTTP/HTTPS, make sure this type of traffic is not fasttracked.

    • @Mi_Fa_Volare
      @Mi_Fa_Volare 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@TheNetworkBerg So far fasttrack rule with packet-mark=no-mark only works when all queues share the same packet mark. One queue more with another packet mark and that fasttrack rule the packet marked packets anyway. Why that? Will that rule make a fit if I add another mangle rule from the packet mark for the queues?

  • @tarzan-wo9xs
    @tarzan-wo9xs 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    hello sir pls let me share speedtest bypass .

  • @MSIZAR
    @MSIZAR 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You in Johannesburg bro?? Small world !!!

    • @TheNetworkBerg
      @TheNetworkBerg  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Just around the corner hehe ;)