Thanks, I really enjoyed that. There are not a ton of accessible graph theory videos available, and the background story made it even more interesting. It is very fortunate that your maths skills are better than your German :D
Watched it and I'm absolutely glad. I love a simple, straightforward graph theory proof and am surprised no one came up with this conjecture. sweet vid!
Hey! Found your video on the SoME voting page. My process didn't allow me to write official feedback, but I wanted to give you my thoughts anyway. The video is clear, I loved the personal quest for a chalkboard at the beginning, and the connection to AI is a good hook. You certainly caught my interest, and I'd love to know more about how this tool and how the mathematical community is using and viewing it. It's always a tricky choice to go through full proofs in explainer videos, especially proofs that you are personally close to, because it's easy to fall into certain traps. Unfortunately, I think yours does. Primarily, there is too much text on "screen" that is not unfurled slowly enough. The visual language, therefore, conveys to the viewer that that text is really what's important. That makes the piece lose a lot of cohesion as the narration becomes almost a distraction. In a similar vein, It didn't feel like *you* were trying to rush, but more that the format was rushing the math. By writing less, drawing visuals for the steps and letting the complete sentences live in the narration, I think even the same script would have more room to breathe. While this video made some mis-steps, I think it's a respectable foot forward. The production was high-quality and your meta-mathematical narrative was quite satisfying. Now that you have a blackboard, I hope we see more from you :)
Thank you for your comment. It's actually my butchered German at the end. It's supposed to say, "And so we'll see each other in the next video. Bye." I don't know if this specific Graffiti conjecture was produced at the time I was given it as part of my independent study (I imagine it wasn't), but I was given the conjecture by Dr. F. I think somewhere around 2015 . I don't remember exactly so plus or minus a year.
Best excuse for getting a chalkboard *ever* ! 🤗
Those "maps of maths" are pretty, where did you find them (source)?
found it:
lh6.googleusercontent.com/-ZvtQ2goIJk0/U7L4Sz_zXII/AAAAAAAAACs/DdwEInXKx98/w1565-h881-no/Mathematistan.jpg
Here you go: www.youtube.com/@domainofscience
Thanks, I really enjoyed that. There are not a ton of accessible graph theory videos available, and the background story made it even more interesting. It is very fortunate that your maths skills are better than your German :D
Haven't watched yet but literally liked it for starting a math video by making your own chalkboard. Hell yeah
Watched it and I'm absolutely glad. I love a simple, straightforward graph theory proof and am surprised no one came up with this conjecture. sweet vid!
@@adityakhanna113 Thanks for your input!
I loved the little references at the end
Was that Paul Erdös referenced in the picture 😂
Is this a proof from the Book?
That's a good place to stop!
Cool chalkboard, now I wanna make one myself
Your video is so silly i loved it :]
Thank you!
Hey! Found your video on the SoME voting page. My process didn't allow me to write official feedback, but I wanted to give you my thoughts anyway.
The video is clear, I loved the personal quest for a chalkboard at the beginning, and the connection to AI is a good hook. You certainly caught my interest, and I'd love to know more about how this tool and how the mathematical community is using and viewing it.
It's always a tricky choice to go through full proofs in explainer videos, especially proofs that you are personally close to, because it's easy to fall into certain traps. Unfortunately, I think yours does.
Primarily, there is too much text on "screen" that is not unfurled slowly enough. The visual language, therefore, conveys to the viewer that that text is really what's important. That makes the piece lose a lot of cohesion as the narration becomes almost a distraction. In a similar vein, It didn't feel like *you* were trying to rush, but more that the format was rushing the math. By writing less, drawing visuals for the steps and letting the complete sentences live in the narration, I think even the same script would have more room to breathe.
While this video made some mis-steps, I think it's a respectable foot forward. The production was high-quality and your meta-mathematical narrative was quite satisfying. Now that you have a blackboard, I hope we see more from you :)
Thank you for the very thorough feedback. It is much appreciated. Definitely will apply your suggestions to future projects.
fahy - tloh - vitch
professor's surname, in case you're not mispronouncing it on purpose
Great video, and cheers from Poland!
Michael Penn reference?
Yeah. Plus it was a good place to stop anyway.
I only got 30 seconds in but, yea chalkboards are cool.
"All I need today is a little bit of mathematics and a whole lot of Jesus" - nice shirt :)
Thank you!
What’s the Latin(?) at the end?
Also, nice video. When did graffiti make this particular conjecture?
Thank you for your comment. It's actually my butchered German at the end. It's supposed to say, "And so we'll see each other in the next video. Bye." I don't know if this specific Graffiti conjecture was produced at the time I was given it as part of my independent study (I imagine it wasn't), but I was given the conjecture by Dr. F. I think somewhere around 2015 . I don't remember exactly so plus or minus a year.
@@nucreation4484 Thanks!
Und damit sehen wir ?? Nächsten video, tschüss
@@troxexlot18 "uns im" at least that's what google translate said. Homage to 'The Brightside of Mathematics' TH-cam channel.
@@nucreation4484 It was understandable.
deutsch video macher =D freut mich.