Love this. It kinda broke my heart a little bc I actually remember the very first time I played a C Maj 7 just like that when I was a kid. I thought it was the coolest thing ever. But now that I'm all grown up, I don't play it that way anymore. I don't miss the chord, I miss being young!
@@IntelligentsiaUS triad noun tri·ad ˈtrī-ˌad also -əd Synonyms of triad 1 : a union or group of three : trinity 2 : a chord of three tones consisting of a root with its third and fifth and constituting the harmonic basis of tonal music triadic trī-ˈa-dik adjective triadically trī-ˈa-di-k(ə-)lē adverb
Don't you think that if you habitually add the 9 11 13 to everything it all starts sounding same same ? Like those are some of the extensions we use to add colour and dissonance . If everything is colour and dissonance then it becomes a wash
Completely agree. I also agree with what Adam is saying here but I hear that. I tend to play a G13 when the music calls for a G7 and I fall into the same extension usage which results in, maybe prettier chords, but the 'same' chords nonetheless. Even rich chords can get boring after a while so recently I've been trying to switch and vary it up! Sometimes play some extensions but sometimes just stick to a G7 but with a unique voicing to change it up. I do agree that stacking thirds can sound monotonous and uninteresting though
@@simonn8312Agreed. It has an inclusive sing-a-long aspect in the composition. If more color tones were added in the intro it might have been too out of place. (maybe I'm overthinking this, he could have just liked the stacked sound).
LOVE IT! RE: the G7 voicing, the trap is THE 5th.... 5ths on dominant 7th chords are the kiss of harmonic death. WHY? It's obvious, it undermine ALL of the juicy possible upper extensions especially the ALTERED ones, (b13, #11) In general 5ths are a problem, in a sense it's like doubled a note, because the 5th is the 1st overtone of the root after the octave (and it quite loud). So playing it is like doubling a note (something that is thing to be avoid or very careful with. You are onto something, it's smart to learn the shit you should NEVER do (a few principles) than the million things one COULD do (theoretically) that sound awful. Have you ever seen the extensive list of chord voicings in Bill Dobbins book? OMG, Nobody learns like that.
Fifths are great for voice leading as they’re shared among many chords in a way that isn’t as awkward as the other common notes. Also I completely disagree that a fifth, especially when in a lower range, undermines a flat 13 or a #11, and I would even say it’s wonderful as a close minor second if placed in the proper context, but it could easily be spoiled
For people following along. Of course the 5th as a pedal point is a wonderful sound. But if one plays this chord.... Bb G Eb right h. B -------------------- F left hand G It sounds great, but now add the 5th in between the G and F in the left hand while keeping everything else the same? Woah, do you REALLY want to go with that sound? You're talking about voice leading? In the case of G7#9,b13 the Eb will naturally resolve to the 9th of the following C chord (D). BUT if one is already playing the the "D" that undermines the function of the G7#9,b13 chord. Where does that b13 want to go, and why would anyone play that note (D) before the resolution? That's what the ear hears. Confusion. That's what I meant when I said the 5th "is the kiss of death for domination chords" because it undermines the function of the chord. I ask anyone reading this to play those to voicings and ask yourself "which one sounds better? 5th or no 5th." Please place your opinions below if you like.
I get what you’re saying and I’ve heard this sentiment a lot. There are contexts where this chord sounds great however especially in more pop/rnb settings. Using it over A or D to make A-9 or Dsus13 and then moving the G down to F# and the E down to Eb to make D713b9 is a sound we’re all familiar with.
There are truly situations where these "basic" chords sound just perfect. So "never play this chord" is too stringent. Yes, you may choose a Kenny Barron voicing for a minor 11 or a Bill Evans "So What" voicing or any iother sophisticated stuff; but in some places the closed position maj7 voicings may sound really nice, even in root position. Also, if you add the "13th" to a major chord, it is should be called the 6th as it is a major chord, and with the 7 and the 6th in place at the same time it does strongly sound like an ending chord of a piece and not something that sound necessarily good while playing. I find that each chord, no matter which voicing, open, closed, thirds, quartal chords, stacked in fifth, crunched cluster chord, or whatever, w/ or w/o colorful extensions..... each has its unique character and place.
Funny how tastes change - Playing the 6th and 7th together on a major chord is something I used to think sounded bad, until the whole neo soul thing got me used to it, and now I do it all the time. Especially the quartal voicing of 7-3-6, but also the crunchier closed version here.
Great information with a HORRENDOUS delivery. The first minute of this video is exactly the kind of garbage music pedagogy that has ruined formal music education. No context, no explanation for the myriad situations and styles in which you actually WOULD use those voicings, just "THIS IS BAD AND PLAYING MUSIC THIS WAY IS WRONG." Inspiring.
Its why for most of western tonal history the maj7 was considered a tension note and a non chord tone. (NCT). In Barry Harris world you never play the tonic as a maj7, but as a maj6. Maj7 is inherently unstable. 7 is a leading tone and wants to go somewhere else… the 6 or the 1. Even if you use it for a IV chord, its as a maj9. (eg Cmaj6/F).
first thing that came to mind with the Dm7 voicing was Piano Man - don't know the song too well but I'm pretty sure it begins on that voicing. It definitely has uses in other styles of music, but something to avoid if you want to play Jazz
Safely to say, a chord may not necessarily be totally out of the realm of possibility, and never completely isolated as an invalid option (that is, if it is used in a good and sensible context of a composer, in the best of their judgment and discretion). But of course, there are always the ineffective ways to apply harmonic texture if musical care isn’t thoroughly exercised. But this brought some very good and useful points in light of great harmonic language and elegant flow of jazz voicings and the plethora of viable options for tonal structure!🙂
It’s funny you how you was teaching these chord!!! My md from the Tams was telling my that he voice im his chords in block form I told I spread my chords like I’m in the studio writing!!!! All of the instruments are covered live on stage so I spread with added layers to make us so bigger than what we are!!!
The worst chord I ever heard was when a friend in high school was performing 'happy birthday' on guitar and accidentally landed either a fret higher than intended on the final resolving chord. Sounded something like a G#m/C when playing the song in G.
I feel attacked... Since I watched this video I had to have a heart to heart (with myself) about boring voicings. At the time, it was kind of depressing to think I was playing "the worst chords ever" on occasion and thinking it was OK. For a day or two I felt pretty shitty about it. Thing is, sometimes somebody has to tell you what you are doing wrong in strong words or it just doesn't get through. Like that friend that actually tells you about the boogie hanging out of your nose when everyone else was just trying not to look. It's embarrassing, and you may want to hide in a hole, but if you keep on going like that people might laugh at you.
This entirely clickbaity intro completely ignores most of (or at the VERY LEAST a large amount of) normal jazz (anything from 1910 or earlier up until the mid-1950s). I get that it's more "hip" to not play these types of root-/close-position chords, but it's just straight up revisionism to call these "the worst chord(s) ever/in the history of music", or "a terrible choice, no matter what you're playing". Even just the concept of implying "root- and close-position chords are never a good choice" or saying "take away the root 'cause we don't need it" is insane. I kinda get that you're trying to get people to default to rootless voicings because it's more likely to sound appropriate in a modern jazz context (and I guess that's what most people who learn jazz nowadays probably want to learn) but I highly question the educational value of just pandering to that ignorance, and not even discussing the tradition at all. Also, I feel like it's worth pointing out that the most common four-note, rootless LH voicing for a m7 chord is a major 7th built from the third (e.g. Gmaj7/E for Em7), and vice versa (e.g. Gm7/Eb for Ebmaj7), so clearly these shapes are not actually valueless. And one final note - the most egregiously wrong thing about this video (and the thing which, to me, feels the most un-jazzy) is that you played a natural dominant chord with no alterations for the G7. If you're going to go down the modern jazz route by default, at least flatten the ninth.
My issue is that I get lost playing solo if I don't include the root. Like if I haven't practised a set of voicings in particular for a standard then I won't ever come up with something rootless whilst playing and trying to keep track of what melody works at the same time
I think the D-7 sounds good to some people bc that's basically a G7(9,11) chord. If you played D-7 and went strait to Cmaj13 that'd sound good. Especially if you play Fmaj6 to D-7 to Cmaj6.
I feel a little called out here but also feel 'don't ever do it' is very harsh. When you played the Cmaj7 in standard voicing I thought it sounded great - coming from someone with a big background of ambient and house music, the simplicity of those chords really brings something to the table that is lost in the more jazzy voicings...
I love this! Thanks for all the content! How about a video about Stardust? Why are there a million versions? What changes do you prefer and why? I avoid this tune like the plague on gigs because everybody uses a different version, but it's a shame since it's so beautiful. Any thoughts? Peace yall!
It's not a sin to include the fifth you know. For the d minor having the 5th (A) sounds quite nice. having the g instead make it sound more like a g sus4. Of course it depends on what the bass player is playing as well. I know he's joking some, but he didn't have to destroy the basic voicing so hard.
I feel really called out because I write a lot of music that uses just regular stacked 7th chords, and sometimes some inversions lol. I'm not actually a keyboard player proper (i'm a guitar player) but I do think of music theory in my head on a keyboard, and as soon as you start spreading out the voicings and stuff, it just starts to break my brain. But I admit that I have to agree that I like the voicings in this video more. I've been doing music stuff for so long but Open Studio reminds me of how little I actually know.
definitely get where you're coming from. A good rule is to follow nature, eg. a perfect 'harmonic series' chord is C - C - G - middle C - E (like the harmonics on a string) and note how the notes are far apart near the bottom and get more bunched up near the top. So you can just adjust the stacked 7th chords to have a similar kind of shape. Then again Beethoven didn't seem to care lol
So then start practicing these spread voicing with an intention :) take a chord and know exactly which degrees are you hitting - on a piano it's much easier than on a guitar!
I usually play too many (even by my estimation) of those muddy stacked 3rd, unfortunately, but thankfully I moved out yesterday, so my only piano at the moment is a Reface CP, with its tiny keys. It's got the cutest little gig bag. Therefore, I'll be trying some unusual voicings for the next few days just because... But the previous lesson found its way in thru my skull to my hands somehow, so maybe this one will too. Really, that doesn't happen as often as it should or as I'd like, so I think this video format is pretty good.
It's frankly a little disappointing to see this kind of video being put out by Open Studio. I fell in love with jazz because I listened to someone on TH-cam play these basic sounding root voicings many years ago. I'll probably love these chords until the day I die. Maybe this video is entirely facetious, but that wasn't clear throughout the entire 5 minutes, so I can only assume this video is entirely serious. I hope the beginners who watch this video aren't discouraged from playing jazz with these chords, or feel like they need to play the complex voicings shown to be a "good" jazz musician.
I think the video is more aimed at the intermediate pianist who has had some piano lessons or maybe even an advanced pianist who plays classical music but is new to jazz. You need to know some fundamentals to even be able to put together 7th chords and a ii V I progression. He's really just teaching fairly standard jazz piano voicings here but in an engaging way, IMO. To your point, if a student is excited about having just figured out 7th chords they'll hopefully be even more excited to learn all the cool color tones. Or there's always shell voicings if needed. Anything to get them thinking early about voice leading. I had a degree in piano performance before I ever did any jazz playing at all, and I really wish I'd seen this before I bought a copy of the real book and started putting together tunes without knowing any stylistically appropriate voice leadings lol
I don’t disagree with the argument that there are ways to improve upon basic sounding voicings, that the fifth can often be omitted, etc. I mostly disagree with how the video claims that Cmaj7 and it’s corresponding root position voicings are the “worst chords in the history of music”. Music is all about creating motion and tension. Ugly sounding, tense, voicings have a purpose, as well as dull, “boring” voicings built from a stack of thirds or that double the fifth or root. I’m a huge fan of Open Studio and want them to continue creating an open and inclusive jazz community. Videos like this don’t align with that mission, in my opinion.
I Can see the meaning of this, but when I attend a jam session the Music runs so fast I can’t overcome to play this new learning, so its more easy to go for the safe “bad sounding and bland voicings”. I wonder how to throw the Old and play the new.🥵
at some point, deforming the chordS that much makes it as boring as not spicing it up. Chord changes with notes so close to each other sound repetitive.
You probably shouldn’t be telling students this. First of all, Barry didn’t say not to play those chords. I disagree with your notion of those chords don’t sound good, but instead, I think you’ll agree that they should be moved or resolved. Anyway, I enjoy do enjoy your teaching, just disagreement about this
Reading all the comments here, I'm also kind of disappointed from that vid. Make a vid to show instead when and where these basic chords sound just right and why.
BUT............ if you add an Eminor7 over the top of it (right hand)............it becames a different chord!!!!! Now spread it out in a plethora of ways that I know you're about to show!
I get the message of the video, however, play whatever you like however you like. You don't have to always play all the tensions. I used to think like this and now i'm screwed and can't play a straight triad without thinking it sounds cringe. Hear your music, play whats needed. If the part needs a root Cmaj7, play a root Cmaj7. Sophistication is beautiful but don't go too far. Edit: i know the video is made in a sarcastic way. I just thought i'd add my opinion for those who take things more literally xd
Adam I have something worse: You play those same stacked thirds voicings but a whole step higher because you’re a trumpet player and you got the chords from your Bb Real Book.
@@userziocaro Cmaj7 is not the same as Cmaj11. It sounds better, richer, etc... Because of the extensions. He's not manipulating the voicings, he's making new voicings. It's just fucking click bait, a desease that's all over youtube
Is it not possible to differentiate a bit more? I mean come on! We all now that you can make chords that simple sound great. It totally depends on the context! Bill Evans used these voicing very often and made em work! Maybe instead of trying to restrict and to forbid the student of playing a certain thing, why not teach in a way that challenges the student to use the material in spite of the difficulty to make it sound good and make it work! That dogmatic pedagogy Is so restrictive and limiting
Please ALWAYS use this digital keyboard display! I love love LOVE your videos but have so much difficulty in discerning which keys are being pressed when it's just a camera hanging over your piano.
You're clearly just trying to drive down the price of 7th chords so you can engage in some kind of arbitrage. I'm on to you!
Love this. It kinda broke my heart a little bc I actually remember the very first time I played a C Maj 7 just like that when I was a kid. I thought it was the coolest thing ever. But now that I'm all grown up, I don't play it that way anymore. I don't miss the chord, I miss being young!
Facts
You speak the truth
Truth
All these chords sound beautiful & this is clearly tongue in cheek.
Idk man, never is a little harsh. They can be cool if they happen through 4 part voice leading. Maybe I do want to be Surgey Rachmaninoff though.
he's joking with "never" - this is an exaggerated point obviously
You guys took it very serious....🤣🎺
@@IntelligentsiaUS Bro is mad he got called out for using boring chords
@@IntelligentsiaUS
triad
noun
tri·ad ˈtrī-ˌad
also -əd
Synonyms of triad
1
: a union or group of three : trinity
2
: a chord of three tones consisting of a root with its third and fifth and constituting the harmonic basis of tonal music
triadic
trī-ˈa-dik
adjective
triadically
trī-ˈa-di-k(ə-)lē
adverb
I love surgery BachmOnAndOff
Don't you think that if you habitually add the 9 11 13 to everything it all starts sounding same same ? Like those are some of the extensions we use to add colour and dissonance . If everything is colour and dissonance then it becomes a wash
Also the way he voice led the first chords makes them sound way worse than how they would actually sound with some good voice leading
Completely agree. I also agree with what Adam is saying here but I hear that. I tend to play a G13 when the music calls for a G7 and I fall into the same extension usage which results in, maybe prettier chords, but the 'same' chords nonetheless. Even rich chords can get boring after a while so recently I've been trying to switch and vary it up! Sometimes play some extensions but sometimes just stick to a G7 but with a unique voicing to change it up. I do agree that stacking thirds can sound monotonous and uninteresting though
Suffering from this problem atm. Forget the beauty of simpler chords sometimes.
That's some serious chord shaming. When I heard that Dm7, I was instantly transported to the intro to "Piano Man". Classic.
That’s true
That’s what makes the song so nice, because it’s in some ways amateurish, but also relatable, just sit on the piano and go for it
@@simonn8312Agreed. It has an inclusive sing-a-long aspect in the composition. If more color tones were added in the intro it might have been too out of place. (maybe I'm overthinking this, he could have just liked the stacked sound).
LOVE IT!
RE: the G7 voicing, the trap is THE 5th.... 5ths on dominant 7th chords are the kiss of harmonic death. WHY? It's obvious, it undermine ALL of the juicy possible upper extensions especially the ALTERED ones, (b13, #11)
In general 5ths are a problem, in a sense it's like doubled a note, because the 5th is the 1st overtone of the root after the octave (and it quite loud). So playing it is like doubling a note (something that is thing to be avoid or very careful with.
You are onto something, it's smart to learn the shit you should NEVER do (a few principles) than the million things one COULD do (theoretically) that sound awful.
Have you ever seen the extensive list of chord voicings in Bill Dobbins book?
OMG, Nobody learns like that.
Fifths are great for voice leading as they’re shared among many chords in a way that isn’t as awkward as the other common notes. Also I completely disagree that a fifth, especially when in a lower range, undermines a flat 13 or a #11, and I would even say it’s wonderful as a close minor second if placed in the proper context, but it could easily be spoiled
For people following along.
Of course the 5th as a pedal point is a wonderful sound.
But if one plays this chord....
Bb
G
Eb
right h. B
--------------------
F
left hand G
It sounds great, but now add the 5th in between the G and F in the left hand while keeping everything else the same?
Woah, do you REALLY want to go with that sound?
You're talking about voice leading?
In the case of G7#9,b13 the Eb will naturally resolve to the 9th of the following C chord (D).
BUT if one is already playing the the "D" that undermines the function of the G7#9,b13 chord.
Where does that b13 want to go, and why would anyone play that note (D) before the resolution?
That's what the ear hears. Confusion.
That's what I meant when I said the 5th "is the kiss of death for domination chords" because it undermines the function of the chord.
I ask anyone reading this to play those to voicings and ask yourself "which one sounds better? 5th or no 5th."
Please place your opinions below if you like.
I get what you’re saying and I’ve heard this sentiment a lot. There are contexts where this chord sounds great however especially in more pop/rnb settings. Using it over A or D to make A-9 or Dsus13 and then moving the G down to F# and the E down to Eb to make D713b9 is a sound we’re all familiar with.
I love it. Brutal honesty with useful recommendations. “Silly stack of thirds.”
Awesome.
There are truly situations where these "basic" chords sound just perfect. So "never play this chord" is too stringent. Yes, you may choose a Kenny Barron voicing for a minor 11 or a Bill Evans "So What" voicing or any iother sophisticated stuff; but in some places the closed position maj7 voicings may sound really nice, even in root position. Also, if you add the "13th" to a major chord, it is should be called the 6th as it is a major chord, and with the 7 and the 6th in place at the same time it does strongly sound like an ending chord of a piece and not something that sound necessarily good while playing. I find that each chord, no matter which voicing, open, closed, thirds, quartal chords, stacked in fifth, crunched cluster chord, or whatever, w/ or w/o colorful extensions..... each has its unique character and place.
Funny how tastes change - Playing the 6th and 7th together on a major chord is something I used to think sounded bad, until the whole neo soul thing got me used to it, and now I do it all the time. Especially the quartal voicing of 7-3-6, but also the crunchier closed version here.
Great information with a HORRENDOUS delivery. The first minute of this video is exactly the kind of garbage music pedagogy that has ruined formal music education. No context, no explanation for the myriad situations and styles in which you actually WOULD use those voicings, just "THIS IS BAD AND PLAYING MUSIC THIS WAY IS WRONG." Inspiring.
thank you! that comment summed up the way I reacted to the video pretty well
The easiest fix to that Dm7 is to play it exacly like you did but call it an inversion of F6 instead!
Barry harris would be proud
Its why for most of western tonal history the maj7 was considered a tension note and a non chord tone. (NCT).
In Barry Harris world you never play the tonic as a maj7, but as a maj6. Maj7 is inherently unstable. 7 is a leading tone and wants to go somewhere else… the 6 or the 1. Even if you use it for a IV chord, its as a maj9. (eg Cmaj6/F).
haha! nice one. i agreed until you broke my heart with the Dm7.. i love it. i play it so often as stacked thirds -.-
Thank you for making this. Best teacher ever.
That CM7 sounds pretty good but far too quartal for a lot of cases. At the end of the day it's a matter of taste, isn't it?
first thing that came to mind with the Dm7 voicing was Piano Man - don't know the song too well but I'm pretty sure it begins on that voicing. It definitely has uses in other styles of music, but something to avoid if you want to play Jazz
My level of jazz piano lesson. I know the theory but the voicing is where the beauty of jazz is
Guitarist here trying to learn some piano. I feel attacked 😂
Me too! 😂
Safely to say, a chord may not necessarily be totally out of the realm of possibility, and never completely isolated as an invalid option (that is, if it is used in a good and sensible context of a composer, in the best of their judgment and discretion). But of course, there are always the ineffective ways to apply harmonic texture if musical care isn’t thoroughly exercised. But this brought some very good and useful points in light of great harmonic language and elegant flow of jazz voicings and the plethora of viable options for tonal structure!🙂
I love simple and understandable videos like this. Lol
It’s funny you how you was teaching these chord!!! My md from the Tams was telling my that he voice im his chords in block form I told I spread my chords like I’m in the studio writing!!!! All of the instruments are covered live on stage so I spread with added layers to make us so bigger than what we are!!!
The worst chord I ever heard was when a friend in high school was performing 'happy birthday' on guitar and accidentally landed either a fret higher than intended on the final resolving chord. Sounded something like a G#m/C when playing the song in G.
I am taking my guitar playing to the next level by stealing all of Adam's secrets. This videos are priceless!
Helpful and concise and cheeky. Three for three. Thanks!
I feel attacked... Since I watched this video I had to have a heart to heart (with myself) about boring voicings. At the time, it was kind of depressing to think I was playing "the worst chords ever" on occasion and thinking it was OK. For a day or two I felt pretty shitty about it. Thing is, sometimes somebody has to tell you what you are doing wrong in strong words or it just doesn't get through. Like that friend that actually tells you about the boogie hanging out of your nose when everyone else was just trying not to look. It's embarrassing, and you may want to hide in a hole, but if you keep on going like that people might laugh at you.
That first chord is the opening of Bowie's "Changes", right?
This entirely clickbaity intro completely ignores most of (or at the VERY LEAST a large amount of) normal jazz (anything from 1910 or earlier up until the mid-1950s). I get that it's more "hip" to not play these types of root-/close-position chords, but it's just straight up revisionism to call these "the worst chord(s) ever/in the history of music", or "a terrible choice, no matter what you're playing".
Even just the concept of implying "root- and close-position chords are never a good choice" or saying "take away the root 'cause we don't need it" is insane. I kinda get that you're trying to get people to default to rootless voicings because it's more likely to sound appropriate in a modern jazz context (and I guess that's what most people who learn jazz nowadays probably want to learn) but I highly question the educational value of just pandering to that ignorance, and not even discussing the tradition at all.
Also, I feel like it's worth pointing out that the most common four-note, rootless LH voicing for a m7 chord is a major 7th built from the third (e.g. Gmaj7/E for Em7), and vice versa (e.g. Gm7/Eb for Ebmaj7), so clearly these shapes are not actually valueless.
And one final note - the most egregiously wrong thing about this video (and the thing which, to me, feels the most un-jazzy) is that you played a natural dominant chord with no alterations for the G7. If you're going to go down the modern jazz route by default, at least flatten the ninth.
True words, I totally agree.
My issue is that I get lost playing solo if I don't include the root. Like if I haven't practised a set of voicings in particular for a standard then I won't ever come up with something rootless whilst playing and trying to keep track of what melody works at the same time
I conclude this is a relative statment your makin', but point received.
B.S. It may be relevant to jazz, but in classical harmony, the "stack of thirds" voicing is quite essential. Refer Bach 371 chorales for a start.
I think the D-7 sounds good to some people bc that's basically a G7(9,11) chord. If you played D-7 and went strait to Cmaj13 that'd sound good. Especially if you play Fmaj6 to D-7 to Cmaj6.
Lol I agree for C and G but for some reason the Dmin feels good to me
What do you think about using them as left hand upper voice structures as in the fmaj7 shape over d or em7 over c ? Still lame ??
I feel a little called out here but also feel 'don't ever do it' is very harsh. When you played the Cmaj7 in standard voicing I thought it sounded great - coming from someone with a big background of ambient and house music, the simplicity of those chords really brings something to the table that is lost in the more jazzy voicings...
I knew it was going to be the stacked Cmaj7 before I even hit play.
Many years ago I attended a clinic with guitarist Allan Holdsworth and he also specifically called out these stacked voicings as awful.
First minute is literally all I’ve ever played when attempting jazz… 😅
Simple and brilliant! 🎹
...i mean it doesn't sound THAT bad
That may be aaaall iiii neeeeed 😄 !
“Frontin” by Jamie Cullum @1:26
i don't get it... is this for piano specifically? otherwise, seems elitist to me
Ironically, the worst chords are the best chords
This is hubris spitting in the face of god.
Are yyou talking about these voicings in all keys or the Dm7 ,G7, Cmaj7 specifically?
I love this! Thanks for all the content! How about a video about Stardust? Why are there a million versions? What changes do you prefer and why? I avoid this tune like the plague on gigs because everybody uses a different version, but it's a shame since it's so beautiful. Any thoughts? Peace yall!
It's not a sin to include the fifth you know. For the d minor having the 5th (A) sounds quite nice. having the g instead make it sound more like a g sus4. Of course it depends on what the bass player is playing as well. I know he's joking some, but he didn't have to destroy the basic voicing so hard.
I think the dominant version is the worst, personally
Yep,.
ok man, got it. thanks
Jazz: all chords are built on a stack of thirds
Also jazz: BOO beginners you suck go home
I feel really called out because I write a lot of music that uses just regular stacked 7th chords, and sometimes some inversions lol. I'm not actually a keyboard player proper (i'm a guitar player) but I do think of music theory in my head on a keyboard, and as soon as you start spreading out the voicings and stuff, it just starts to break my brain. But I admit that I have to agree that I like the voicings in this video more.
I've been doing music stuff for so long but Open Studio reminds me of how little I actually know.
definitely get where you're coming from. A good rule is to follow nature, eg. a perfect 'harmonic series' chord is C - C - G - middle C - E (like the harmonics on a string) and note how the notes are far apart near the bottom and get more bunched up near the top. So you can just adjust the stacked 7th chords to have a similar kind of shape. Then again Beethoven didn't seem to care lol
So then start practicing these spread voicing with an intention :) take a chord and know exactly which degrees are you hitting - on a piano it's much easier than on a guitar!
I now realise why I never liked the simple C 7 or, even worse for my ears, the basic G b7, they really sound like garbage!Thank you, Adam!
0:37 Cue Piano Man by Billy Joel ~~
I usually play too many (even by my estimation) of those muddy stacked 3rd, unfortunately, but thankfully I moved out yesterday, so my only piano at the moment is a Reface CP, with its tiny keys. It's got the cutest little gig bag. Therefore, I'll be trying some unusual voicings for the next few days just because... But the previous lesson found its way in thru my skull to my hands somehow, so maybe this one will too. Really, that doesn't happen as often as it should or as I'd like, so I think this video format is pretty good.
Serious question - does that stack of thirds (C maj 7) sound better if it's a left hand rootless voicing for A min 7? Or still no go?
I love it😄😄
It's frankly a little disappointing to see this kind of video being put out by Open Studio. I fell in love with jazz because I listened to someone on TH-cam play these basic sounding root voicings many years ago. I'll probably love these chords until the day I die. Maybe this video is entirely facetious, but that wasn't clear throughout the entire 5 minutes, so I can only assume this video is entirely serious. I hope the beginners who watch this video aren't discouraged from playing jazz with these chords, or feel like they need to play the complex voicings shown to be a "good" jazz musician.
I think the video is more aimed at the intermediate pianist who has had some piano lessons or maybe even an advanced pianist who plays classical music but is new to jazz. You need to know some fundamentals to even be able to put together 7th chords and a ii V I progression. He's really just teaching fairly standard jazz piano voicings here but in an engaging way, IMO. To your point, if a student is excited about having just figured out 7th chords they'll hopefully be even more excited to learn all the cool color tones. Or there's always shell voicings if needed. Anything to get them thinking early about voice leading.
I had a degree in piano performance before I ever did any jazz playing at all, and I really wish I'd seen this before I bought a copy of the real book and started putting together tunes without knowing any stylistically appropriate voice leadings lol
I don’t disagree with the argument that there are ways to improve upon basic sounding voicings, that the fifth can often be omitted, etc. I mostly disagree with how the video claims that Cmaj7 and it’s corresponding root position voicings are the “worst chords in the history of music”. Music is all about creating motion and tension. Ugly sounding, tense, voicings have a purpose, as well as dull, “boring” voicings built from a stack of thirds or that double the fifth or root. I’m a huge fan of Open Studio and want them to continue creating an open and inclusive jazz community. Videos like this don’t align with that mission, in my opinion.
completely disagree! it depends where you place those chords, what precedes them. i use them all the time and they don't sound awful.
With Chicago’s Color My World, at least they Arpeggiated the C major 7.
Be afraid, be very afraid...:(
damn that guy is so rude!!
Don't mock my piano playing, buster!
If Cmaj7 was good enough for Bach then its good enough for me . I think it sounds beautiful, all the chords do.
I Can see the meaning of this, but when I attend a jam session the Music runs so fast I can’t overcome to play this new learning, so its more easy to go for the safe “bad sounding and bland voicings”. I wonder how to throw the Old and play the new.🥵
Explaining this to beginers Takes several months.
at some point, deforming the chordS that much makes it as boring as not spicing it up. Chord changes with notes so close to each other sound repetitive.
Heard Fred Hersch say so before in a vid.
Eschew "silly stack[s] of thirds!" :)
Chord voicing tier list when?
Dom +13 is probably my favorite chord
Hey, don't dis my dude Rachmaninov. :P
please tell me the app that you are using that recognises the chords :)
Pretty sure he's using MIDIculous
tf did the 7th chords do?
idk Maness, that chord sounds pretty good on my guitar. Maybe the piano is the problem?!? 😉
mind blown!
3:06 >8O OEHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
I’m unsubscribing as Adam recently has gone too much to attract more viewers.
Most helpfull vid ever
I really love Rachmaninoff bruh
I beg to differ.
You probably shouldn’t be telling students this. First of all, Barry didn’t say not to play those chords. I disagree with your notion of those chords don’t sound good, but instead, I think you’ll agree that they should be moved or resolved. Anyway, I enjoy do enjoy your teaching, just disagreement about this
Reading all the comments here, I'm also kind of disappointed from that vid. Make a vid to show instead when and where these basic chords sound just right and why.
Duly noted. (And dopio-ly shamed 😞)
BUT............ if you add an Eminor7 over the top of it (right hand)............it becames a different chord!!!!! Now spread it out in a plethora of ways that I know you're about to show!
I demand an apology to Rachmaninoff what is this undeserved shade
I get the message of the video, however, play whatever you like however you like.
You don't have to always play all the tensions. I used to think like this and now i'm screwed and can't play a straight triad without thinking it sounds cringe.
Hear your music, play whats needed. If the part needs a root Cmaj7, play a root Cmaj7.
Sophistication is beautiful but don't go too far.
Edit: i know the video is made in a sarcastic way. I just thought i'd add my opinion for those who take things more literally xd
I knew it!
Adam I have something worse: You play those same stacked thirds voicings but a whole step higher because you’re a trumpet player and you got the chords from your Bb Real Book.
Probably the best opening sentence in the history of music education videos
bad clickbait. this is yucky
😢😢 i.. i like stacks of 3rds 🎉 ... m3rds
Well I guess you tried to be controversial, but obviously there are places where these work perfectly. One example - house music!
The worst chord is 1, -3, -7, -9. Seriously, try it.
yo funny
a minor 6 in root position also sounds terrible
The worst chord is C major Triad flat 9
C E G Db
I don't like dm7 at all. Terrible chord 😄
Dont play this chord voicing!!
Proceeds to play another chord. What the fuck?
He's demonstrating how they sound
@@userziocaro Cmaj7 is not the same as Cmaj11.
It sounds better, richer, etc... Because of the extensions.
He's not manipulating the voicings, he's making new voicings.
It's just fucking click bait, a desease that's all over youtube
Is it not possible to differentiate a bit more? I mean come on! We all now that you can make chords that simple sound great. It totally depends on the context! Bill Evans used these voicing very often and made em work! Maybe instead of trying to restrict and to forbid the student of playing a certain thing, why not teach in a way that challenges the student to use the material in spite of the difficulty to make it sound good and make it work! That dogmatic pedagogy Is so restrictive and limiting
Please ALWAYS use this digital keyboard display! I love love LOVE your videos but have so much difficulty in discerning which keys are being pressed when it's just a camera hanging over your piano.