Look at what Hulk Hogan did throughout 1991 for Undertaker. Their first match was a tag team match ( Hogan and Warrior vs. Slaughter, Taker and Adnan). Hogan and Warrior won, but Hogan only hit Taker twice ( Just two punches only ) and he let Taker control most of the match. Then, at SNME when Taker was hitting Warrior, Hogan intervened and hit Taker with the WWF World Heavyweight Championship belt, but Taker was unaffected and Hogan played the role of the stunned and scared person and was retreating in front of Taker and then left him to chase Slaughter and Adnan. Hogan wrestled Taker for the first time on July 29 and Hogan won with difficulty due to a mistake by Paul Bearer. Then, in Paul Bearer's special segment the Paul Bearer's Funeral Parlor, Undertaker intervened and hit Hogan from behind, and when Roddy Piper and Randy Savage came to help Hogan, Taker was able to block the two chair strikes directed by Piper and Savage. Hogan did all of this to help Undertaker's character. When they wrestled at Survivor Series 1991 Hogan let Undertaker control 90% of the match and played the role of the scared one when he came out of the ring at the beginning of the match and Taker won in the end and took the belt after Ric Flair interfered. Then six days later at Tuesday in Texas PPV. Hogan defeated Undertaker and took the belt after a tough match in which Hogan won after breaking the rules and throwing ash in Taker's face. He did this to make Taker look strong and its like even Hulk Hogan can't beat Taker clean. Hogan did all of this for Taker. But Taker and some of his crybaby fans are trying hard to deny Hogan's favor and what he did for Taker. He asked Taker to act with him in the movie Suburban Commando. He put money in Taker's pocket early in the movie when Taker left WCW because they didn't trust him. Hogan supported him early in the movie and then in the series of matches and confrontations between them. But Taker didn't appreciate that. His argument was that Hogan lied about the injury. The injury is real. First, the plan for Taker to win and then lose the belt to Hogan six days later was confirmed by Bruce Prichard in his podcast. Second, Hogan's injury is real. Second, Hogan's injury is real . Taker held Hogan in the wrong way that was different from the way he later executed the Tombstone. He pulled Hogan's arm and shoulder up and because he lifted Hogan's head too high. Hogan's head landed on Taker's thigh and that's why Hogan's neck was injured. so asay thank You Hogan and stop this nonsense . unfortunately, Taker did not appreciate that.
We know That Hulk Hogan head didn't touch the mat. But the injury was due to the way Taker held Hogan's body. He raised Hogan's arm and shoulder up and when he got down on his knees Hogan's neck was injured after hitting Taker's thigh. The scene is very clear. The conclusive evidence that Taker's hold is wrong is that Taker later changed his way of executing the Tombstone. He no longer pulls his shoulder up like he did with Hulk Hogan, but rather wraps his arms around his opponent's back without pulling the opponent's arm and shoulder up. This is an admission from him that the old way of executing the Tombstone was wrong. Also there is no such thing as (Taker doesn't hurt anyone) this is an exaggeration and a lie. It is impossible that he doesn't cause any harm to any opponent. He hurt Austin at SummerSlam 1998 to the point that Austin fainted from a huge mistake by the undertaker. so Don't exaggerate please
Bruce Prichard in his podcast stated that the idea of Undertaker winning and then Hogan defeating Taker at the Tuesday in Texas PPV was all planned from the beginning. The WWF booked the Texas Arena a long time ago and announced Tuesday in Texas PPV at Survivor Series PPV . Hulk Hogan did not try to destroy Undertaker. If Hogan wanted to destroy him, he would have refused to lose to him and crushed him in the same match despite Taker. But Hogan lost to him because the original plan was for Taker to win by cheating and then Hogan to win by cheating and for the belt to be taken away from Hogan and given to the winner of the 1992 Royal Rumble , which is Ric Flair. That is why Flair interfered in every match between Hogan and Taker. And so that the Hogan-Flair challenge could be built for the belt . Undertaker wanted to believe that Hogan's injury was not real but he is wrong . Taker held Hogan in the wrong way that was different from the way he later executed the Tombstone. He pulled Hogan's arm and shoulder up and because he lifted Hogan's head too high. Hogan's head landed on Taker's thigh and that's why Hogan's neck was injured. Thank you.
So Taker is lying when he said that Hogan came to him after the match and said he hurt him. Taker said that out of his own mouth on his podcast. Interesting
@@bee.dee.coy2kay11 It seems you didn't understand what I said. Hulk Hogan's injury is real and Hogan told him that he was injured, but Taker is the one who doesn't want to admit his mistake and that his way of holding Hogan's body was wrong. Undertaker says (I pride myself on not Hurting my opponent) and this is a lie. He injured Koko's neck and tried in his podcast to make it seem like Koko B ware was exaggerating the injury even though the shot was clear. He injured Austin at SummerSlam 1998 and cracked the Great Khali's head open with a chair. When he claims that he did not cause any harm to his opponents thats a Big Lie . he is a liar. You must realize that and not close your eyes to his mistakes.
@@Aizenborgman Hogan's injury was not real. To this day, that was one of the safety Tombstones I've ever seen Taker put on someone. We will agree to disagree. Thank you for your comments.
@@bee.dee.coy2kay11 Remember when Sting's neck was hurt after Seth Rollins threw him into the corner? Sting's neck was hurt even though it didn't touch the corner. His Back just hit the corner NOT THE NECK . Does this mean that Sting is a liar just because his neck didn't touch anything? Of course he didn't lie, but unfortunately those who defend the undertaker . Just emotional defense. It's not necessary to touch something to be injured. Like a car driver who fastens his seatbelt when he hits something, he might be injured due to the strong vibration of the impact without his neck touching anything because he fastened the seatbelt. Please think wisely away from emotion because you love Taker
@@bee.dee.coy2kay11 In the beginning, Undertaker was executing the Tombstone in a different, incorrect way compared to other years. Around 1994, he began to understand the right way. He would wrap his arms around his opponent back without holding his shoulder, pulling the shoulder up, unlike his method in the past. In the beginning, he was clumsy in the way he executed it, holding the shoulder and pulling it up, and this is wrong, which is why many people were harmed, including Hogan, Koko, Kerry Von Erich, and the Jobbers
Why are you surprised that Hogan came back so quickly after his neck injury? Mick Foley suffered serious injuries at Hell in a Cell and continued the match and came back the same night and Mick interfered in Austin's match against Kane. Bruno continued the match after being dropped on his head by Stan Hanson?
Maybe because Hogan was lying about his neck injury to Taker to build backstage heat. They're never going to tell the average fan they took a title of someone because of backstage politics but...
@@bee.dee.coy2kay11 You're wrong. Bruce Prichard confirmed in his podcast that the plan for Taker to win and then Hogan to beat Taker six days later was the master plan. This Tuesday in Texas PPV was ready and promoted from the beginning. They promoted it at Survivor Series. Didn't you watch the entire Survivor Series 91 ppv ? Hogan didn't keep the belt when he beat Taker in Texas. They took the belt away from him the next day to give it to the winner of the 92 Rumble (Ric Flair). That's why Ric Flair interfered in Hogan and Taker's matches twice and the belt was taken away from Hogan and given to Flair in the Rumble to build the Hogan and Flair schedule for WrestleMania 8. Why are you surprised that Taker lost so quickly? Everything is clear. Kane beat Austin at King of the Ring 1998 for the belt and lost the belt the next night on Raw to Austin. Why didn't we see Kane cry like Taker did? Taker is a liar. Hulk Hogan could have changed all those plans and defeated Taker despite Taker. As long as you're talking about Hogan's policy. Hogan could have defeated Taker at Survivor Series with his own policy and relieved himself of all this, but he didn't and he lost to Taker.
@@bee.dee.coy2kay11 Yes. Like Mick Foley finished the Hell in a Cell match despite serious injuries and came back the same night and interfered in the Kane and Austin match. Is Mick Foley a liar and not injured because he came back to interfere in the Austin vs. Kane match? Hogan didn't say his neck was broken. He just said it was hurt. There is a difference between hurt and broken. Focus please. Don't speak emotionally. You should have noticed that after the Hogan vs. Taker match at Survivor Series Hogan actually got up after the match and walked to the gate and didn't use a stretcher. If he was claiming it was broken he would have called for a stretcher. But unfortunately I am surprised that you don't notice all of this??
Look at what Hulk Hogan did throughout 1991 for Undertaker. Their first match was a tag team match ( Hogan and Warrior vs. Slaughter, Taker and Adnan). Hogan and Warrior won, but Hogan only hit Taker twice ( Just two punches only ) and he let Taker control most of the match. Then, at SNME when Taker was hitting Warrior, Hogan intervened and hit Taker with the WWF World Heavyweight Championship belt, but Taker was unaffected and Hogan played the role of the stunned and scared person and was retreating in front of Taker and then left him to chase Slaughter and Adnan. Hogan wrestled Taker for the first time on July 29 and Hogan won with difficulty due to a mistake by Paul Bearer. Then, in Paul Bearer's special segment the Paul Bearer's Funeral Parlor, Undertaker intervened and hit Hogan from behind, and when Roddy Piper and Randy Savage came to help Hogan, Taker was able to block the two chair strikes directed by Piper and Savage. Hogan did all of this to help Undertaker's character. When they wrestled at Survivor Series 1991 Hogan let Undertaker control 90% of the match and played the role of the scared one when he came out of the ring at the beginning of the match and Taker won in the end and took the belt after Ric Flair interfered. Then six days later at Tuesday in Texas PPV. Hogan defeated Undertaker and took the belt after a tough match in which Hogan won after breaking the rules and throwing ash in Taker's face. He did this to make Taker look strong and its like even Hulk Hogan can't beat Taker clean. Hogan did all of this for Taker. But Taker and some of his crybaby fans are trying hard to deny Hogan's favor and what he did for Taker. He asked Taker to act with him in the movie Suburban Commando. He put money in Taker's pocket early in the movie when Taker left WCW because they didn't trust him. Hogan supported him early in the movie and then in the series of matches and confrontations between them. But Taker didn't appreciate that. His argument was that Hogan lied about the injury. The injury is real. First, the plan for Taker to win and then lose the belt to Hogan six days later was confirmed by Bruce Prichard in his podcast. Second, Hogan's injury is real. Second, Hogan's injury is real . Taker held Hogan in the wrong way that was different from the way he later executed the Tombstone. He pulled Hogan's arm and shoulder up and because he lifted Hogan's head too high. Hogan's head landed on Taker's thigh and that's why Hogan's neck was injured. so asay thank You Hogan and stop this nonsense . unfortunately, Taker did not appreciate that.
We know That Hulk Hogan head didn't touch the mat. But the injury was due to the way Taker held Hogan's body. He raised Hogan's arm and shoulder up and when he got down on his knees Hogan's neck was injured after hitting Taker's thigh. The scene is very clear. The conclusive evidence that Taker's hold is wrong is that Taker later changed his way of executing the Tombstone. He no longer pulls his shoulder up like he did with Hulk Hogan, but rather wraps his arms around his opponent's back without pulling the opponent's arm and shoulder up. This is an admission from him that the old way of executing the Tombstone was wrong. Also there is no such thing as (Taker doesn't hurt anyone) this is an exaggeration and a lie. It is impossible that he doesn't cause any harm to any opponent. He hurt Austin at SummerSlam 1998 to the point that Austin fainted from a huge mistake by the undertaker. so Don't exaggerate please
Bruce Prichard in his podcast stated that the idea of Undertaker winning and then Hogan defeating Taker at the Tuesday in Texas PPV was all planned from the beginning. The WWF booked the Texas Arena a long time ago and announced Tuesday in Texas PPV at Survivor Series PPV . Hulk Hogan did not try to destroy Undertaker. If Hogan wanted to destroy him, he would have refused to lose to him and crushed him in the same match despite Taker. But Hogan lost to him because the original plan was for Taker to win by cheating and then Hogan to win by cheating and for the belt to be taken away from Hogan and given to the winner of the 1992 Royal Rumble , which is Ric Flair. That is why Flair interfered in every match between Hogan and Taker. And so that the Hogan-Flair challenge could be built for the belt . Undertaker wanted to believe that Hogan's injury was not real but he is wrong . Taker held Hogan in the wrong way that was different from the way he later executed the Tombstone. He pulled Hogan's arm and shoulder up and because he lifted Hogan's head too high. Hogan's head landed on Taker's thigh and that's why Hogan's neck was injured. Thank you.
So Taker is lying when he said that Hogan came to him after the match and said he hurt him. Taker said that out of his own mouth on his podcast. Interesting
@@bee.dee.coy2kay11 It seems you didn't understand what I said. Hulk Hogan's injury is real and Hogan told him that he was injured, but Taker is the one who doesn't want to admit his mistake and that his way of holding Hogan's body was wrong. Undertaker says (I pride myself on not Hurting my opponent) and this is a lie. He injured Koko's neck and tried in his podcast to make it seem like Koko B ware was exaggerating the injury even though the shot was clear. He injured Austin at SummerSlam 1998 and cracked the Great Khali's head open with a chair. When he claims that he did not cause any harm to his opponents thats a Big Lie . he is a liar. You must realize that and not close your eyes to his mistakes.
@@Aizenborgman Hogan's injury was not real. To this day, that was one of the safety Tombstones I've ever seen Taker put on someone. We will agree to disagree. Thank you for your comments.
@@bee.dee.coy2kay11 Remember when Sting's neck was hurt after Seth Rollins threw him into the corner? Sting's neck was hurt even though it didn't touch the corner. His Back just hit the corner NOT THE NECK . Does this mean that Sting is a liar just because his neck didn't touch anything? Of course he didn't lie, but unfortunately those who defend the undertaker . Just emotional defense. It's not necessary to touch something to be injured. Like a car driver who fastens his seatbelt when he hits something, he might be injured due to the strong vibration of the impact without his neck touching anything because he fastened the seatbelt. Please think wisely away from emotion because you love Taker
@@bee.dee.coy2kay11 In the beginning, Undertaker was executing the Tombstone in a different, incorrect way compared to other years. Around 1994, he began to understand the right way. He would wrap his arms around his opponent back without holding his shoulder, pulling the shoulder up, unlike his method in the past. In the beginning, he was clumsy in the way he executed it, holding the shoulder and pulling it up, and this is wrong, which is why many people were harmed, including Hogan, Koko, Kerry Von Erich, and the Jobbers
Promoting the LIVE IDM Podcast from the Bruxelles Waffle Haus.
Why are you surprised that Hogan came back so quickly after his neck injury? Mick Foley suffered serious injuries at Hell in a Cell and continued the match and came back the same night and Mick interfered in Austin's match against Kane. Bruno continued the match after being dropped on his head by Stan Hanson?
Maybe because Hogan was lying about his neck injury to Taker to build backstage heat. They're never going to tell the average fan they took a title of someone because of backstage politics but...
@@bee.dee.coy2kay11 You're wrong. Bruce Prichard confirmed in his podcast that the plan for Taker to win and then Hogan to beat Taker six days later was the master plan. This Tuesday in Texas PPV was ready and promoted from the beginning. They promoted it at Survivor Series. Didn't you watch the entire Survivor Series 91 ppv ? Hogan didn't keep the belt when he beat Taker in Texas. They took the belt away from him the next day to give it to the winner of the 92 Rumble (Ric Flair). That's why Ric Flair interfered in Hogan and Taker's matches twice and the belt was taken away from Hogan and given to Flair in the Rumble to build the Hogan and Flair schedule for WrestleMania 8. Why are you surprised that Taker lost so quickly? Everything is clear. Kane beat Austin at King of the Ring 1998 for the belt and lost the belt the next night on Raw to Austin. Why didn't we see Kane cry like Taker did? Taker is a liar. Hulk Hogan could have changed all those plans and defeated Taker despite Taker. As long as you're talking about Hogan's policy. Hogan could have defeated Taker at Survivor Series with his own policy and relieved himself of all this, but he didn't and he lost to Taker.
@@Aizenborgman and Taker confirmed that he got heat because Hogan claimed he hurt him to Vince but was amazingly fine just 5 days later.
@@bee.dee.coy2kay11 Yes. Like Mick Foley finished the Hell in a Cell match despite serious injuries and came back the same night and interfered in the Kane and Austin match. Is Mick Foley a liar and not injured because he came back to interfere in the Austin vs. Kane match? Hogan didn't say his neck was broken. He just said it was hurt. There is a difference between hurt and broken. Focus please. Don't speak emotionally. You should have noticed that after the Hogan vs. Taker match at Survivor Series Hogan actually got up after the match and walked to the gate and didn't use a stretcher. If he was claiming it was broken he would have called for a stretcher. But unfortunately I am surprised that you don't notice all of this??