Hidden Hazards of Halogen Lamps

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 25 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 841

  • @bigclivedotcom
    @bigclivedotcom ปีที่แล้ว +1342

    For reference, I used to use a 500W halogen lamp with no front glass above my workbench in winter for the light and heat. I didn't experience any adverse effects despite it being about 800mm above my head.

    • @ehsnils
      @ehsnils ปีที่แล้ว +198

      If you never look directly into the light then it should be a lower risk since eyes are the most sensitive, but UVB and UVC are at long term exposure increasing the risk of skin cancer.
      But I would like to see the differences in spectrum from ordinary warm white LEDs and daylight LEDs. The color temperature sometimes matter more than you think, and our preference is as I see it learned to accept the color temperature of warm white since incandescent light is warm white but daylight is preferred for best color representation and it makes us less tired.

    • @Peter_A1466
      @Peter_A1466 ปีที่แล้ว +226

      Must be absorbed by the beard! 😁

    • @-Jethro-
      @-Jethro- ปีที่แล้ว +120

      Your second head should grow any day now.

    • @danyf3116
      @danyf3116 ปีที่แล้ว +46

      Always nice crossing the path of another TH-camr you like to follow.

    • @kittyztigerz
      @kittyztigerz ปีที่แล้ว +30

      that be why all your hair is gone on your heads

  • @Enjoymentboy
    @Enjoymentboy ปีที่แล้ว +389

    Back around 93 to 2000 I had halogen track lighting in one room with the lights aimed towards one wall. While the bulbs were replaced a few times they were never re-aimed but none of them had any glass covers...just the bare bulbs. The walls were painted blue and when we finally decided to redo the room we were surprised to see a very clear bleaching of the paint only where the lights had been aimed and it was even more evident where the lights had overlapped each other.

    • @fellenXD
      @fellenXD ปีที่แล้ว +52

      My closest McDonalds used to have this photo wallpaper above the cash registers, and a handful of halogen spotlights in the ceiling above. I don't know for how long they had that setup, but you could clearly see these triangular bleached areas below each spot, perfectly following the cone of light.
      This sure explains why.

    • @Poodleinacan
      @Poodleinacan ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Same thing happened to coloured plastic films I had put in-front of the ones I had in my bedroom

    • @Beregorn88
      @Beregorn88 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      Photobleaching can be cause by visible light too, and in some small measure even by NIR, if the source is intense enough and the exposure is long enough. The effect however is much more prominent at shorter wavelengths (blue and UV)

    • @robertmccabe8632
      @robertmccabe8632 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      While a very interesting topic, people ignore the sun's increased UV output due to Grand solar minimum.
      The scatter off objects is blatantly obvious and will cause cataracts (eventually, if eye protection is not worn). Even clear polycarbonate safety glasses filter UV.

    • @gabrielv.4358
      @gabrielv.4358 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      So you are telling me that 99% of car headlights have radiation???!!!!

  • @dino6627
    @dino6627 ปีที่แล้ว +234

    The main safety function of the glass cover is to contain the hot halogen capsule glass if it explodes.
    There is quite a difference in the front/rear direction heat is emitted between the standard aluminised reflector and dichroic coated glass reflector.
    Metal halide lamps emit considerable UV, some types have UV block glass, others rely on the glass on the enclosure.

    • @MattyEngland
      @MattyEngland ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Yes, the 1kw Metal Halides are vicious.

    • @Stoney3K
      @Stoney3K ปีที่แล้ว +1

      As well as protect the bulb from dirt and dust. Dirt + heat = possible fire.

    • @4DF2007Official
      @4DF2007Official ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Hi, I thought that the shielding protected IT from shattering. (“It” being the bulb) so basically, No shielding= Bulb explodes. Shielding=bulb lasts its Life. (At least that’s what I though)

    • @rotorblade9508
      @rotorblade9508 ปีที่แล้ว

      I had one bulb that exploded (a g9 socket unprotected) and fortunately 😂it broke my phone glass and missed my eyes. so that protection is much more important than uv.

    • @pbe6965
      @pbe6965 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Stoney3K and to protect it from grease/oil (mostly from the fingers).
      The bulb is made from quartz because glass would no withstand the very high temperatures, but the oil from fingers skin will blow it in a very short time, or at least crack it.
      A friend of mine didn't know and installed the tubes with bare fingers, without cleaning them afterwards, all the bulbs died after a few hours, some lasted even less than that.

  • @Basement-Science
    @Basement-Science ปีที่แล้ว +339

    In most cases the amount of UVB you can possibly get from halogen lights is so insignificant compared to any amount of Sunlight and cannot give you a sunburn even if it shines on you all day long.
    That said, there were also specialized "Sunbathing" halogen lamps that ran so hot they actually looked blue. Very short lifetime on those as well.

    • @brainiac75
      @brainiac75  ปีที่แล้ว +141

      For the 10 and 35 watters, sure, it's no biggie - but for the 400 - 1500 watters? I would like to be informed about it ;) Thanks for watching!

    • @MadScientist267
      @MadScientist267 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Yes thank you. It's trivial. Get back from the light and it's not a problem regardless of power that you can buy in a store.

    • @n-steam
      @n-steam ปีที่แล้ว +36

      The Sun is ~1366W/m^2 of actual light energy.
      1500W halogen is going to be way below that because they're so inefficient, even if you're up close. You'd have to be right next to it.
      Maybe its something to be measured and compared on a future video.

    • @MadScientist267
      @MadScientist267 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      @@n-steam 1-2%, so 15-30W worth of light, right up on it
      Edit: And at that, only a tiny sliver of that is UV energy. There's more threat from a 1W UV LED than in a 1500W halogen. 🤷‍♂️

    • @n-steam
      @n-steam ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@MadScientist267 There's an area component to it too. Gonna make a guess and say the area of the light's face is 0.03m^2, so that 30W becomes 900W/m^2.

  • @AWcinema
    @AWcinema ปีที่แล้ว +185

    Thank you for shedding light on this subject😁

    • @brainiac75
      @brainiac75  ปีที่แล้ว +34

      I see what you did there ;) Thanks for the early watch!

    • @CamcorderHomeVideos
      @CamcorderHomeVideos ปีที่แล้ว +5

      This may not have made me laugh, but this is a good one. 😉

    • @-Jethro-
      @-Jethro- ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Dad joke. Groan. 😂

    • @1234j
      @1234j ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ya burnt!😂

    • @steadfasttherenowned2460
      @steadfasttherenowned2460 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      His assessments are great. He is a bright man.

  • @aarongreenfield9038
    @aarongreenfield9038 ปีที่แล้ว +127

    Yes do more on the incandescent bulbs please.

    • @Muonium1
      @Muonium1 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Despite their deceptively simple construction, they include quite fascinating and advanced concepts in physics to be implemented in their "modern" form. The coiled coil of the filament and the Langmuir sheath of gas flow in the lit bulb being just one.

  • @Raintiger88
    @Raintiger88 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Awesome video and never something I had thought about before. I worked in a steel mill for nearly 25 years and we used tons of those 500W halogen and many had no glass just to aid in replacement (I, myself, am guilty of blowing up a few halogens in that time by touching it taking it out of the packaging).

  • @BoHolbo
    @BoHolbo ปีที่แล้ว +22

    Another thing that the front glass on halogen flood lights and the 12V PAR16 lamp you showed us do, is it helps to maximize the lifespan of the bulb by prolonging the cooling time of the bulb glass.
    And for the halogen flood light, the front glass will also catch flying glass shards in case the bulb explodes.

  • @blueredbrick
    @blueredbrick ปีที่แล้ว +38

    I bought a handheld 1000w halogen lamp from a second had store that specializes in photography. It's tiny, not that long tube format but a bulb type of several cm.
    When it's powered up there's seemingly an extra sun under the sky. After a while you can smell litte dust particles just being incinerated. I'm always impressed with that monster light.
    I wonder what the spectrum is like.

    • @perstaffanlundgren
      @perstaffanlundgren ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I have one of those to , with Handel on right? not ment to be on very long ,because the whole thing gets very hot fast, these was
      Produced when they used 8 mm celoid film reels, often they did not expose very long clips in one go, so
      The bad cooling was a lesser issue
      Then today I think. Mine smell burnt dust also when on and yes it's like having your own sun.

    • @blueredbrick
      @blueredbrick ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@perstaffanlundgren Yes the one made with bakelite and metal and glasfibres. It's a beast but even more so because it's basicly a pointsource. i never used it more than half a minute at a time because of the intensity and handheld bizar power. Awesome thing. Don't think I'll let my 5 yr old kid play with it. She can have it when she can play and understand with fire and electricity and not harm anyone seriously.
      Microwaves and their magnetrons are another wonderfull dangerous but so interesting system to experiment with.

    • @dannyvanderheide6098
      @dannyvanderheide6098 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      As an event/theatre lighting tech I am unfazed by 1kW lamps, they have been the standard for years now. A lot of theatres even still use 2kW halogens for their front lights, just an array of ~12 2kW lights baking on the stage aided by 1kW's and 750w's

  • @x9x9x9x9x9
    @x9x9x9x9x9 ปีที่แล้ว +60

    Recently the US outlawed lots of halogen and incandescent bulbs. But they did not put in an import ban into the law. As someone who sells lightbulbs for a living this is kinda infuriating. People come in looking for a specific bulb and I have to tell them that I can't sell them one but they can order it online from China...

    • @4u25out
      @4u25out 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Harbor freight store still sells it.

    • @Warp2090
      @Warp2090 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Why can't u just buy from China and resell?

    • @x9x9x9x9x9
      @x9x9x9x9x9 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      @@Warp2090 As a retail store we cant sell them due to the "Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007." Which went into effect in 2023. It makes it "illegal" for us to sell them. I am not sure on exactly how it works but since we are a franchise of a large company the large company would get fined if the EPA inspected us and found us selling bulbs that dont output at least 45 lumens per watt (most incandescent bulbs dont) or aren't on the approved exemption list. The large company would then fine us and potentially take away our store. Its stupid and I hate telling 90+ year old people, who dont even know what the internet is, that they have to order a bulb online but its all I can do.

    • @thedopplereffect00
      @thedopplereffect00 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@x9x9x9x9x9hopefully people vote the right way next time

    • @x9x9x9x9x9
      @x9x9x9x9x9 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@thedopplereffect00 Imma be honest idk what the right way is this time around. Also this act was made by the Bush administration (repub) and then actually signed in by Biden (dem)...

  • @Elnufo
    @Elnufo ปีที่แล้ว +19

    You can see a UV Stop in Halogen Lamps if you shine a UV light source at them, they will glow Blue-ish if a Filter is present.

    • @psirvent8
      @psirvent8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Absolutely and I'm glad to not be the only one to have found this magic trick if I can call it like that.
      No one else makes mention of it on the web, and I found that it also applies to metal halide bulbs that have UV filters.

  • @johnnemo4146
    @johnnemo4146 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    I was at a fashion show (a long time ago) and the big halogen lamp in a reflector ABOVE the catwalk melted, and the molten glass missed one of the models by just a few centimeters. The lamp was obviously unprotected. Imagine the horror if the glass had fallen on the head of a model.

    • @volvo09
      @volvo09 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ouch, that wouldn't have been good. If the bits fell on a wood floor the pieces would probably start smoking.

  • @Mrdibzahab
    @Mrdibzahab ปีที่แล้ว +44

    I used to get similar halogen bulbs from the fusers of old laser printers. They were really long, but probably a few hundred watts at most. They scared the hell out of my dutch rabbit once, when she must have thought that the sun moved into my living room.

    • @SeanBZA
      @SeanBZA ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Biggest I have is a self ballasted 360W sodium vapour lamp, which has a 200W internal tungsten filament lamp as ballast for a 160W HPS capsule. ASL a few 400W mercury vapour lamps as well, which i used as room lighting when I wanted a lot of light, as they have a very good CRI by design, as they are high bay lamps for indoor use.

    • @sovb
      @sovb ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@SeanBZA Where'd you get your hands on a self ballasted sodium lamp?? I've been looking for one for absolutely ages! (Something like 3 years...)

    • @SeanBZA
      @SeanBZA ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@sovb An old Chinese lamp, got it at a lighting and electrical supplier, and wanted it the second I saw it in the big box of reduced price units.

    • @Snowcube
      @Snowcube ปีที่แล้ว

      @@SeanBZA Did you mean self ballasted mercury? I've never heard of a self ballasted sodium lamp before, that sounds really interesting.

    • @SeanBZA
      @SeanBZA ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Snowcube No it has that yellow sodium glow. Think it was mostly used on fishing boats, the yellow penetrates water better. Internally mostly SBMV, just the mercury has a lot of sodium dissolved in it.

  • @faxezu
    @faxezu ปีที่แล้ว +15

    The EU ban hit me hard...
    But not for private lighting. I'm currently working on my PhD in semiconductor technology and using a sputter chamber.
    The tool has a heated chuck to put the wafer on. The heater has to withstand ultra high vacuum and temperatures of around 300°C.
    The tool manufacturer decided to use three 400W halogen lamps as heat sources since the glass perfectly isolates the hot metal from the vacuum and thus prevents contamination of my samples.
    We build up a stock as spare parts but they break way faster than anticipated...
    Without some good connection to a friend outside of EU they would be unobtanium.

    • @mernokimuvek
      @mernokimuvek ปีที่แล้ว

      The EU needs to get lost. They even want to ban fluorescent lamps this year.

  • @JustPyroYT
    @JustPyroYT ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I personally never noticed that halogen lamps are always behind a glass cover...
    Really interesting Video! 👍

  • @83hjf
    @83hjf ปีที่แล้ว +22

    The MR16 that you noticed filter UV lights are known here as "Dichroic" lamps, the UV light is NOT reflected by the metallized coating, which is a dichroic mirror that only reflects visible light. You may also see a smaller amount of IR with them as well. Try putting your spectrometer to the back of the lamp and you'll probably find your missing spectrum. You can't measure it like you did because the filament is vertical so most of the energy is radiated sideways for the parabolic mirrors to catch. You can also try with an AR111 lamp which is a metalic reflector, not dichroic (AR111 = Alu reflector, 111mm). These are often used in applications where you can't release the heat into the recessed ceiling behind.

  • @scorpi0n486
    @scorpi0n486 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Man even when I don't know about something in your videos you explain this like a hot knife in a butter, also your intro is coolest i ever saw

  • @Qsie
    @Qsie ปีที่แล้ว

    A new Braniac video! I'm loving your bright attitude here 😄

  • @Ultrazaubererger
    @Ultrazaubererger ปีที่แล้ว +53

    50h bulbs are actually quite common for microscopes and projectors.
    For reference, check out the OSRAM 64640 HLX
    There are other versions with 300h and 2000h iirc and they are not that much more expensive.
    Although prices might vary quite a bit now as availability gets worse.

    • @Gameplayer55055
      @Gameplayer55055 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      speaking about projectors lamps, i heard IMAX lamp is some incredible halogen or ark lamp that is water cooled and has explosion risks if operated carelessly

    • @keithyinger3326
      @keithyinger3326 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@Gameplayer55055 that sounds like it would make an interesting video. I mean how the light works. Not it exploding.. although sadly I'm sure that would get a lot more views than how it works.

    • @TheShivABC
      @TheShivABC ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Gameplayer55055 You should check out Photonicinductions youtube channel, he powers and blows up lamps like the imax lamp in his videos

  • @MmntechCa
    @MmntechCa ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I work at a TV station. We've mostly replaced the studio lights with LEDs, but there's still a few high wattage (1KW+) ARRI lamps kicking around. Those all have Fresnel lenses. A lot of the portable halogen kits for video production were bare bulb. Just a set of folding barn doors for protection when stowed. Was drilled into us back in college to never touch them. Of course every time you rented the kit, there was always at least one bulb was burned out and needed replacing. So you'd have to gingerly fondle the spares with a set of gloves. Those also got so obscenely hot that it was rare to see ones that didn't have melted plastic parts. I'm glad they've been phased out.

  • @chilledoutpaul
    @chilledoutpaul ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I use to be an electrical contractor and also done my apprenticeship after leaving school, anyway back in the day I had fitted many of these lights I have even fitted 3kw lights to loading bays, yards etc and for testing purposes operated them without the safety glass. Back in the 809's i wasn't aware of the uvc problem and i dont remember collage remarking on about it. Anyway each time i had left an installation the safety was attached to the light and cover screwed up tight , makes you wonder about halogen car headlights!

    • @psirvent8
      @psirvent8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Well, some halogen car bulbs do filter UV by themselves as they glow blue under a blacklight.

  • @pizzablender
    @pizzablender ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I believe the 50 hours on that 1000 watt lamp at the end. Running hotter for more output and efficiency (and more blue and UV!), but at the cost of servcie life.
    See its use, it's meant for theaters etc. Not for general lighting.

  • @redspiderlily9971
    @redspiderlily9971 ปีที่แล้ว

    Watching your video not only can learn knowledge but also is so satisfied from unboxing.

  • @BritishBeachcomber
    @BritishBeachcomber ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I did sometimes get mild UV suntan from working under high power halogen lamps. But not as bad as from arc welding on a hot day without skin protection from the arc .

    • @psirvent8
      @psirvent8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Might be the already existing melanin in your skin getting oxidized by the UVA rays, causing a light tan that will most likely disappear quite quickly.
      However it can also cause premature aging of your skin as well as increase your chances of getting a melanoma much later.
      Despite not causing sunburns.
      This is basically like a low power version of the UVA tubes used in tanning salons.

  • @erikziak1249
    @erikziak1249 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    What about H4 car lamps? They are halogen too. But only behind a super thin plastic cover. At least on my e-up. But the old Škoda 130L from 1986 has thick glass headlights. Are new cars emitting UV light from their halogen bulbs through their super thin plastic headlights? Or does it filter it out?

    • @psirvent8
      @psirvent8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Well, the Philips H4 bulbs that came with my car do have UV filtering as they glow blue under a blacklight.
      Plastics on the other hand can also block UV.

  • @SeanBZA
    @SeanBZA ปีที่แล้ว +2

    50 hours is because they run it way hotter, so the lamp does evaporate faster, and the halogen cycle will not be running fast enough to stop it from sputtering onto the glass.
    For a better UV source you need a metal halide lamp, as those that are intended for enclosed fixtures only have a thinner UV block layer on the quartz glass outer, which you can see fluoresce a lovely blue during run up, where the UV output is high, but the internal lamp pressure is not so high, and the light output is around 10% of the full output. The halogen lamps also need the glass outdoors, as they are very effective insect attractors, I was using one while camping, and the next morning I had a big pile of very well crisped insects on the ground in front of it, attracted to the light, and cooked on the front glass, as well as the lamp body.

  • @alfepalfe
    @alfepalfe ปีที่แล้ว +20

    I believe some lamps used for photography had super thin filaments for a colder color temperature resulting in an avrage life in the tens of hours, that may be what that is.

    • @brainiac75
      @brainiac75  ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Yeah, it is mentioned on the paper that it is for 'professional use on stages, theatres etc.' Not meant for lighting a home. 50 hours is still rather ridiculous though ;) Thanks for watching!

    • @freevipservers
      @freevipservers ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yeah photoflood bulbs, normal incandescent but at 3200-3400K cct.

    • @Wyatt_James
      @Wyatt_James ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@freevipservers bulbs with similar color temperature are available as halogens but with significantly longer lifespans, of course. I use 1000w 3240k studio lights with a quoted lifespan of a few hundred hours, iirc. Haven't looked in a while. Not quite the 3400 of a 500w photoflood though.

    • @benoitgrange3479
      @benoitgrange3479 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I used such lamps when filming on super-8 in the 80s, the film sensitivity was 16 or 64 iso, much light was needed. The lamps where VERY fragile and almost glowed red for 10 seconds when switched off. These were also very good to find faults in your apartment mains wiring.

    • @nos9784
      @nos9784 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@benoitgrange3479 how would you find those wiring faults? Follow the smoke?

  • @Peter_A1466
    @Peter_A1466 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    The leaflet included with professional theater lights (like PAR 64 bulbs) does warn for skin burn due to UV emissions.
    Regrettably some professional bulbs also only have an estimated life of 50 hours, although "long life" versions might be available.

    • @psirvent8
      @psirvent8 ปีที่แล้ว

      That's interesting.
      Do you have any links to a PDF version of that leaflet by any chance ?

  • @jannettw
    @jannettw ปีที่แล้ว +4

    As a young kid I had a halogen lamp on my desk where I did crafts and homework. I broke the protective glass cover on the lamp after messing with it and burning lots of crayons/erasers on it. After that I also quickly broke the halogen bulb by touching it too much. I remember asking for a new bulb and seeing on the packaging of the halogen bulb that it said not to touch it, but without further explanation, so I asked my dad to install it. I then continued to use the lamp for many years without the glass cover... this video was mind blowing to me. I was worried at first but after reading the comments and researching more, I'm convinced the bulb (10W) was low power enough that there was no risk of adverse effects really.

    • @psirvent8
      @psirvent8 ปีที่แล้ว

      The bulb could also have had been a UV-filtering version, in that case the lack of glass wouldn't have really mattered in term of UV emissions.
      Did you get any eye strain from using the lamp ?
      That can happen if there's no UV filter, although probably not with a 10W bulb as it will not produce that much UV compared to a blacklight for example.

  • @stphinkle
    @stphinkle ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I remember halogen bulbs. Some Torche lamps used to use them and put out good light. These were actually popular in the 1990:. But a lot of people phased them out because of the heat risk. Some of the halogen lights also used to be popular outdoors on commercial buildings, tennis courts, horse arenas, amphitheaters, and other applications.

    • @User0000000000000004
      @User0000000000000004 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I remember the 90s. Back when the future was bright. I don't want to be here anymore.

  • @Gunbudder
    @Gunbudder ปีที่แล้ว +3

    My dad got my a halogen bulb desk lamp from Costco in 1998. it still works perfectly fine today and has not dimmed or changed color temp at all. i often would forget and leave it on overnight as a kid too. i swear those lamps are black magic.

    • @omgpickle
      @omgpickle ปีที่แล้ว

      Wow I want one of those! They normally break so fast.

  • @OtherWorldExplorers
    @OtherWorldExplorers ปีที่แล้ว +34

    Brainiac75
    Have you tested the actual sunscreen to see if it does actually protect against UV lights a b and c?

    • @brainiac75
      @brainiac75  ปีที่แล้ว +24

      Yes, I used it on a banana and UVC source in this video: th-cam.com/video/bb1Nc1oygTs/w-d-xo.html
      The A and B protection is trivial in sunscreens, but UVC protection is rare! Thanks for watching :)

    • @RK-kn1ud
      @RK-kn1ud ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@brainiac75 I believe this is fine because almost no UVC makes it to Earth's surface from what I understand.

    • @Muonium1
      @Muonium1 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      In addition to UVC from the sun not being able to penetrate the atmosphere as the above comment notes, the UVC blocking label thing on the sunscreen is kind of a marketing gimmick. Any organic molecule in existence that is providing strong absorption in the UVA will also provide at least as good or better protection (absorption and conversion into heat) in the UVB and UVC. If a low energy photon in the near UV has enough energy to excite the electronic state of a molecular orbital, then a higher energy one will also have enough to do so as well and will be just as easily absorbed. This only changes when you start getting into the x-ray region where the energy and momentum of the photons becomes so large it can start barreling through significant depths of matter WHILE exciting/ionizing it along the way regardless of what it's made of.

    • @nos9784
      @nos9784 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@Muonium1 I think the "special" sunscreen is for arc welding, where the atmosphere doesn't protect us.
      Regarding the "it will absorb higher energies as well", interesting.
      I always thought different atoms/ electron states/ chemical bonds would absorb specific wavelengths/ photons.
      Do the just take as much as they can, and let the Photon go on with the rest? Or is this a different kind of interaction than what I am thinking about?

    • @Cyberguy42
      @Cyberguy42 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@Muonium1 That is not correct. The absorption spectrum of Avobenzone, a common sunscreen ingredient, clearly shows that it is about 4-5x more effective at absorbing light in the UVA range than in the UVB/UVC range. That's why multiple compounds are needed to also block B and C effectively.
      Large, complex molecules may have fairly large absorption spectrums, but it is not accurate to say that "Any organic molecule in existence that is providing strong absorption in the UVA will also provide at least as good or better protection... in the UVB and UVC".
      An atom/molecule can only absorb photons with energies corresponding to available electron energy level transitions. Due to some quantum stuff I don't fully understand, the frequency of the photon doesn't have to be exactly equal, but it needs to be close. A large, complex molecule may have numerous available transitions and therefore be capable of absorbing photons across a broad range of frequencies, but it is not accurate to say that "If a low energy photon in the near UV has enough energy to excite the electronic state of a molecular orbital, then a higher energy one will also have enough to do so as well and will be just as easily absorbed."

  • @Laralinda
    @Laralinda ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I have energy saving LED everywhere in my house, but you are absolutely right, food looks somewhat off, so I use an old incandecent lamp in my kitchen, hopefully it doesn't die too soon. I wonder if there is any LED that can make look food "normal".

    • @ytstolemyname
      @ytstolemyname ปีที่แล้ว +4

      HiCRI LEDs can do that

    • @brainiac75
      @brainiac75  ปีที่แล้ว +9

      LEDs are getting better and you should be able to find some with a CRI/RA rating of >90 relatively cheap (IKEA has them last I checked). They are much better than the old ">80" horror shows... LEDs with >95 are even better but much more expensive and I've only seen them in dedicated studio lights. Thanks for watching!

    • @kaspervendler1726
      @kaspervendler1726 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Not anything that you can pick up in a semiregular store.

    • @stevetalkstoomuch
      @stevetalkstoomuch ปีที่แล้ว +1

      FEIT Enhance or Sylvania Tru-Wave bulbs are 90-93 CRI in warm white 3000K and are sold at many stores now - Menards, ACE Hardware, Costco, and online.

    • @xavier6130
      @xavier6130 ปีที่แล้ว

      Lidl sometimes sells >97's in Europe for pretty cheap, so you may be able to find them there.

  • @geoffgeoff143
    @geoffgeoff143 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The main reason for glass is in case the lamp explode, which they often do. The UV radiation is actually negliable. Put the transducer at typical working distance and see a massive reduction.

  • @mikmik9034
    @mikmik9034 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What I remember of Halogen was that it was orange tinted light, Cheap to use, and that people exposed to it would get angry.

  • @radioman4738
    @radioman4738 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you for doing the testing, and explaining the results. That is a nice light meter "Spectrometer" you have there.

  • @hmata3
    @hmata3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    A vendor at Teotihuacan told us that the ancient Aztecs would view the sun/ eclipses through shards of obsidian glass. I checked it out sure enough, you can see a clear view of the sun through even a thick piece of obsidian.
    But if you look online, there's a debate about it's safety as viewing the sun through obsidian is not an approved method and may be potentially dangerous to your eyes.
    It'd be cool if you did a quick video about the levels of light (UV, visible, IR) that go through obsidian.

  • @tfrowlett8752
    @tfrowlett8752 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    When I was younger I made the mistake of breaking a halogen lightbulb with a hammer. It was from a car headlight and I needed to dispose of it, so I decided to break it, the bang from the pressure was immense, it sounded like a gunshot, and glass went everywhere. I’m surprised I wasn’t hit by any of it, now I devote my time to collecting interesting bulbs and vacuum tubes

    • @psirvent8
      @psirvent8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yikes !
      Fortunately it wasn't a xenon bulb from a cinema projector as they contain a gas under a much higher pressure than halogen bulbs and can really cause serious damage when they burst.
      For that reason technicians in charge of replacing the bulbs have to wear a full suit as well as gloves and a face shield to protect themselves from shrapnel in unfortunates cases and also the door to the lamp on modern projectors even comes with a key lock to keep random people out of the danger zone basically.
      The bulbs also come in protective casings designed to contain the shrapnel and shockwave in case they burst during transport.
      Most of the time it's either a hard plastic box the shape of the bulb but it can also be a thick fabric wrapper.

    • @tfrowlett8752
      @tfrowlett8752 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@psirvent8 those things go up to 200 bar, the largest bulb I have is a 1kw cloud base detection light and that has barely any pressure, I don’t deal with high pressure halogens anymore, I’m not taking chances again 😅

    • @tfrowlett8752
      @tfrowlett8752 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@psirvent8 photonicinduction also did a video on those xenon lamps

  • @CarlVanWormerAE7GD
    @CarlVanWormerAE7GD ปีที่แล้ว +4

    You should do a video on the magic of the halogen cycle. Most people don't know about it.

  • @Bat8hitcrazy
    @Bat8hitcrazy ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Even though the amount of uv is insignificant really this is actually pretty interesting. I like your videos they are addicting.

  • @entropyachieved750
    @entropyachieved750 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great channel. Love the experiments you do. Very interesting and always have a few surprise results which makes for great science

  • @GQuack
    @GQuack ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This is an interesting topic to cover, though I am more curious about those hi-power halogens! Would love to see a video on them! Good video overall.

  • @erebostd
    @erebostd ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Thanks for that vital information! I have a (quite small, 20 watts or so) halogen lamp in my cubby in my bathroom. I was wondering why the plastic is yellowing over time, and while watching your video i remembered that the glas over it broke some time ago. Well, that explains it. I hope i haven’t done any damage to my eyes 😳. I ordered an led right after watching your video…

    • @omgpickle
      @omgpickle ปีที่แล้ว

      Halogens are supposedly the best at mimicing the sun. You need IR for your eyes at the same time because of repair issues I read? And leds miss out on those wavelengths. I don't even know what to believe these days though.

    • @psirvent8
      @psirvent8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Did you get any eye strain from looking at the light from those bulbs ?

    • @erebostd
      @erebostd ปีที่แล้ว

      @@psirvent8 not really. I 5hink compared to what the sun puts out this wasn’t even comparable. But I replaced it, just to be sure…

  • @Chris-io2cs
    @Chris-io2cs ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Could you tell me about/link me to the USB spectrometer you use? I see the software has a range from about 200-1200, I know the software does some correcting itself based on the photodiode's sensitivity curve but do you know the range on your particular photodiode and if it can reasonably detect much outside the 200-1200 range? (for example, if you shined a 200nm source would it even detect it? or does it really lose sensitivity at that point? and the same with infrared, can this scope get the full halogen range?) Or is the software set to this range specifically because that's what it should be able to detect? It still seems like a solid range for a USB scope so I'm wondering how it much it costs.

  • @alex_stanley
    @alex_stanley 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    If incandescent bulbs are always dimmed up to full brightness and dimmed back down to off, they will last almost forever. The 150 watt incandescent floods in my kitchen are 30 years old; those filaments have never once been subjected to the stress of being heated from room temperature to white hot in an instant.

  • @whuzzzup
    @whuzzzup ปีที่แล้ว +9

    How much did the spectrometer cost?

    • @brainiac75
      @brainiac75  ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Currently around €1800 so not inexpensive... Thanks to my patrons for helping out with it! But an equivalent model from a well-known laboratory equipment brand would probably be twice as expensive...

  • @algorithminc.8850
    @algorithminc.8850 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent ... you gave us a video, so we don't go blind and can keep seeing your videos. Thank you ... cheers ...

  • @K-Effect
    @K-Effect ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I have used halogen lamps in the summertime late at night. The halogen lamp will attract the biggest, craziest looking flying beetles you’ll ever see. Some of the bugs look like they are not from Earth

    • @psirvent8
      @psirvent8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      As will incandescent bulbs and white LEDs will do as well.
      Bugs are actually attracted to the green and blue wavelengths in addition to the UV.
      This is why there are amber and yellow lamps available not to attract bugs.

  • @TestECull
    @TestECull ปีที่แล้ว +1

    3:28 It won't actually last 25,000 hours because they won't make as much money selling you a lamp that lasts that long. Expect it to fail within the same time span as the halogen bulbs.

  • @bzqp2
    @bzqp2 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    I really hope they will eventually start making LEDs with reasonable spectrae. It's MUCH better compared to the 2005-2010 LEDs but still suck compared to halogens. Lately I switched away from halogens in my kitchen but honestly want to go back. :/

    • @stevetalkstoomuch
      @stevetalkstoomuch ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Use the high CRI LED bulbs like FEIT Enhance or Sylvania Tru-Wave bulbs. Much brighter and better color rendition 90-93 CRI even in warm white 3000K.

    • @volvo09
      @volvo09 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Look for high CRI bulbs. You have to pay more for them, but the light output is excellent.

    • @bzqp2
      @bzqp2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks, will check it out. From what I see the bulb I have now is 80CRI which looks pretty poor.

    • @volvo09
      @volvo09 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@bzqp2 yeah 80's are the usual ones you get, makes colors look poor... If you look up the color spectrum of a low CRI bulbs VS a high CRI you will see how spiky the graph looks, so some colors are overblown, and others look dull since the bulb isn't producing that wavelength to save cost on phosphor.

    • @berukadehikari2634
      @berukadehikari2634 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      If your willing to pay for it, Yuji LED make bulbs with 98 CRI that comes in 2700k to 6500k white. I got a set of their A19 base bulbs and they look much better in color compared to regular LEDs you find

  • @masterbond9
    @masterbond9 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    i work in construction, as an electrician, this is definitely something i will keep in mind, i have seen a couple of these halogen lamps without the protective glass. not too many fortunately, but now i know how its actually a safety hazard

  • @IanDarley
    @IanDarley ปีที่แล้ว +1

    By far the biggest risk with halogen lighting is the heart attack risk when your electricity bill arrives.

  • @h7opolo
    @h7opolo ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Yes, make more content like this. 8:57

  • @pchris6662
    @pchris6662 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I’m glad you took time to compare to a led flood. I really have come to hate the color of led bulbs and I no longer care about the efficiency. Also, my tests show they are overdriving these LEDs and producing so much heat to the point where they consume almost 75 watts anyway. A traditional 75w bulb puts out plenty of light so how are we actually saving anything?
    Just give me my old 10 cent incandescent light bulbs back!!!

  • @signalshift6676
    @signalshift6676 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    That is something I'm intrested in.. I have something similar, I bought a rgb LED strip (12 V, 60 LED/m, not water resistent) new from ebay and I noticed, if I have them switched on only blue, flourescent plastics glow. Now I'm a bit worried what wavelength it emits. Could that blue light be dangerous to my eyes. Maybe that could be a video idea for you. I just tested it and I feel like the green LED also stimulates some plastics)

    • @psirvent8
      @psirvent8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Actually some plastics glow under blue and purple lights even if there's no UV at all.
      For the danger, if looking at the blue light hurts your eyes even the slightest bit I would advise not to keep using it as it can actually be harmful to the retina.

  • @danyf3116
    @danyf3116 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The sight of seeing the 1000 watts glow inside a 500watt casing, made me subscribe.

  • @tristanhameleers7506
    @tristanhameleers7506 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I didn't know this, very nice I see this video. I have actually used some (al be it small and short duration luckely) halogen lamp without glas in front of it (I think). Hopefully enough people see this as this is pretty important.

  • @125brat
    @125brat ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Some years ago I visited a company in Surrey called ERA Technology and in one of their labs they used to test halogen lamps. One of the tests involved firing a high-power IR laser at the filament of an energised lamp to test the capsule integrity. The laser vapourised the filament and the capsule was meant to remain intact as part of the compliance test. Unsurprisingly, a very large proportion of far-easter sourced lamps failed the test and were deemed unsafe as the capsule exploded. Compliant safe capsules remained intact and contained the exploding filament.

  • @Netbug
    @Netbug ปีที่แล้ว +3

    We used to light cigarettes on my halogen lamp when I was a teenager.

  • @TrabberShir
    @TrabberShir ปีที่แล้ว

    Those high intensity compact lamps are actually only going to last the advertised 50 hours or so. They seem to be meant for situations where you need to vastly expand the capability of your existing fixtures temporarily.
    A volunteer organization I worked with used them to cover a fairly large site where we had shifts running from Friday evening to Monday morning three weekends in a row every year. The fixtures were lent to us by company that typically worked on much smaller construction sites, and these high intensity bulbs allowed us to keep the the central area with all the detail work very well lit and also make the surrounding logistical area safely lit with the relatively few fixtures we had available. Even going through one bulb per fixture every weekend it was much cheaper to use these than source more fixtures.

  • @jacky445
    @jacky445 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    When I worked in restaurant, halogen lamps without the glass cower were used to keep the food on the plate warm before waiter come around and take it.

  • @TheTheo58
    @TheTheo58 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Years ago halogen floor lamps were quite popular, I seem to remember they were banned.

    • @Sparky-ww5re
      @Sparky-ww5re ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Being a kid in the 1990s I most certainly remember them and they could be found at most stores at reasonable prices, from about $15 to $50, depending on the model, the higher priced ones had a full range dimmer, while the cheaper ones had high and low. 300 watts was typical, although before 1996 they were also available in 500 watt versions, afterwards Underwriters Laboratories pulled the listing off the 500 watt version and limited the wattage to 300, also around that time they came with the wire cage over the bowl, to reduce, but not eliminate, the risk of fire from curtains, etc from coming in contact. The fire risk, along with high power consumption led to its decline, and after the early to mid 2000s, seemed to have vanished off store shelves. Compact fluorescent, and 50-100-150 watt 3 way incandescent took over.

  • @stanstevey2785
    @stanstevey2785 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    The ban on hallogen is a violation of human rights.

    • @Warp2090
      @Warp2090 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      True

    • @philiplubduck6107
      @philiplubduck6107 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Please say no, I cook with halogen and I don’t want to have to toss the ovens.

    • @Water.897
      @Water.897 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@Warp2090It is very ironic that someone with General Electric's photo agrees with that statement

    • @Warp2090
      @Warp2090 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Water.897 also true.

    • @Antinickholonyak
      @Antinickholonyak 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Also The ban of the hid bulbs, all of them has being replaced by garbage Chinese LED lights

  • @DasIllu
    @DasIllu ปีที่แล้ว +2

    A healthy bit of UV-A is a must for good a CRI.
    Many things not only reflect light of a certain color but also fluoresce. The UV-A gets partially converted to visible light.
    Without that you are missing a bit of vibrancy in colors.
    No UV-A at all would send even Bob Ross into a rage fit.

  • @andrew867
    @andrew867 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Would you be able to do similar tests with plant grow bulbs? I’m interested in the UV output compared to regular fluorescent bulbs, they always look a little more blue.

    • @MattyEngland
      @MattyEngland ปีที่แล้ว +1

      If you mean Metal Halides then they put out a LOT of UV, always wear good eye protection in grow rooms.

    • @psirvent8
      @psirvent8 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@MattyEnglandWhat about high pressure sodium bulbs though ?
      Are they as bad as metal halides ?

    • @MattyEngland
      @MattyEngland ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@psirvent8 No, they're nowhere near as bad, but you can get special glasses that both protect your eyes from the brightness and also help render the colours properly so you can see any insects or nutrient deficiencies better.

    • @psirvent8
      @psirvent8 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@MattyEnglandThank's for the reply.
      I just happen to have gotten a couple of 400W HPS bulbs as part of my new collection of discharge lamps a few days ago, however I don't grow anything indoors and the color rendering doesn't matter enough to justify the purchase of expensive goggles as far as I'm concerned.
      In fact I already knew they were a thing, however because of their high price and the fact that they won't get much use given how little I use my HPS lamps at least to this day, I'll probably not buy them anytime soon.
      Now I used one of those bulbs to light up a room and despite having had sunglasses on and the bulb concealed from direct view I still got eyestrain afterwards.
      I also tried wearing my ski goggles instead but they didn't reduce the brightness of the light at all due to their orange tint, unlike my sunglasses, however the ski goggles happen to work quite well when I use my 400W mercury vapor blacklight or my 250W metal halide floodlight instead, and unlike the HPS goggles I can also use them for skiing or to protect my eyes from UVC tubes as well, although I also have to hold a glass panel in front of my face to effectively block the UVC since the goggles aren't as effective against UVC as they are against UVA and UVB.

  • @hgbugalou
    @hgbugalou ปีที่แล้ว +2

    We had one of these in the house I grew up in. It was a floor lamp in the living room. It used to attract moths and instantly incinerate them leading to that lovely cooked moth smell throughout the living room.

  • @HomelabExtreme
    @HomelabExtreme ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Even though it is dated tech, i'd love to see you do some of the same tests with Sodium (HPS), quartz metal halide and ceramic metal halide.

  • @N4CR
    @N4CR ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Different glass will attenuate UV differently. Low iron glass (used in solar panels) will help if you want more UV through.

  • @lukasandrysik3666
    @lukasandrysik3666 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Hi, I have seen some halogen bulbs glow blue under UV light (365nm) - I guess those that glow have doped glass with some UV absorbing material...Any even one was slightly glowing blue for few seconds after turning the halogen off.

    • @psirvent8
      @psirvent8 ปีที่แล้ว

      You're absolutely right and I'm glad not to be the only one to have found this magic trick out if we even call it a magic trick.
      No one mentioned it anywhere on the internet as far as I know.
      By the way some metal halide bulbs also glow blue under a blacklight as they have a doped quartz outer envelope to block at least some of the UV the arc tube puts out.

  • @MattyEngland
    @MattyEngland ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The glass is there to protect you if the light explodes, and to stop rain hitting the hot bulb and causing it to explode.
    Try a 1000w metal halide, that's UV for you.

    • @Sparky-ww5re
      @Sparky-ww5re ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Metal halide and mercury vapor lamps are safe to be around, because the outer bulb blocks most of the UV light from the arc tube. Serious skin burns, eye damage and in some cases blindness can occur when the outer bulb is broken and the arc tube continues to light, such incidents have occurred in gymnasiums in which fixtures have been struck with balls and other sports equipment. Special bulbs are (or were) available that contained a fuse in series with the arc tube that would burn up and disconnect after a short time if oxygen enters the lamp, these are known as self extinguishing lamps.

    • @psirvent8
      @psirvent8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Sparky-ww5re The outer bulb doesn't block the UVA part of the spectrum and that can still cause eyestrain if you look directly at the bulb or are exposed to the light for too much time especially at close range.
      Ask me how I know.
      By the way some metal halide bulbs have UV-Block marked on them just like halogens and therefore glow blue under a blacklight but despite having a bulb like that in a outdoor floodlight with a thick glass cover I still got eyestrain from having spent too much time under that light.

  • @agranero6
    @agranero6 ปีที่แล้ว

    6:05 That light is called dichroic. It sises several thin layers of materials that have different indexes of refraction engineered mostly to reflect the visible light to the front and to throw the IR to the back so they don't heat the object being illuminated. But maybe it has an effect on the UV too

  • @techtinkerin
    @techtinkerin ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The gloves made me chuckle. Is this one of those radioactive bulbs? 😄👍😎

  • @pubcollize
    @pubcollize ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Could you give recommendations for light spectrometers that measure around 200-1000 nm? I saw the one you use, the Lastertack LR2 costs over 1,700 euros. Is there anything you can recommend and is more affordable?

  • @aarongreenfield9038
    @aarongreenfield9038 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I have one of those tall lamps that reflect the light upwards to the ceiling, and it has that same long halogen bulb, except it is 500 W.

    • @brainiac75
      @brainiac75  ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I had one too! But it fell apart during a move. You just reminded me that I still have the half-tube glass cover that was over the halogen bulb in it. It is made of thick glass so should make for a great UVC+B block filter... Thanks for the reminder and early watch, Aaron :)

    • @aarongreenfield9038
      @aarongreenfield9038 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@brainiac75 I did the opposite, I still have the functioning lamp, but I broke the little UV glass during a move, but luckily it shines on the ceiling, and not directly on anyone. On top of that it's not used much.

    • @psirvent8
      @psirvent8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@aarongreenfield9038Same for me during my childhood, we had several of these tall lamps, most without any glass over the bulb and I don't remember having suffered from eyestrain or anything related to the UV.
      Might get ARMD or cataract earlier though.

    • @aarongreenfield9038
      @aarongreenfield9038 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@psirvent8 You don't really need them anyways since you're not in line of sight with the bulb, and I noticed the bulb's tend to last about twice as long without it anyways, because they're not getting anywhere near as hot.

  • @martin-vv9lf
    @martin-vv9lf 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    good video, i had no idea of the dangers of halogens. fluorescent lamps can also be dangerous if you happen to have changed the transformer to a different model.

  • @paulstubbs7678
    @paulstubbs7678 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Interesting, for ages I had a 500W halogen as a back yard light, it never had a glass cover, nor is there any place to fit one. I got sick of replacing bulbs & the high operating cost, so it's now been replaced with a pair of 10W LED floods, they are way better as I can run them for extended periods without wondering about power bill shock.

  • @RC-nq7mg
    @RC-nq7mg ปีที่แล้ว

    Pretty sure the protective glass is there to prevent the stupid hot lamp from exploding if something comes in contact with it. As a work lamp it could come in contact with a lot of debris. I have seen so many of these covered in drywall mud and plaster. The temperature shock would cause the very delicate extremely hot quartz glass to shatter violently sending incredibly hot shrapnel and near molten metal fragments everywhere. The UV is negligible.

  • @ChrisFredriksson
    @ChrisFredriksson ปีที่แล้ว +3

    First and foremost, Thank you for showing full music credits, I love listening to these on Spotify or the like and when I do I hit the memories of TH-camrs I've seen them on - something I like to do now and then 😋❤
    Furthermore, what a short video! Felt like 30 seconds, it was really interesting - as all your videos of course, I haven't even thought or seen anything about UV on these in Sweden. Never crossed my mind, neither the long tubes or the spotlights and I've used them quite a bit.
    Can't wait for next video, always fun to watch! ❤

  • @johnpekkala6941
    @johnpekkala6941 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Yes bare halogen bulbs emit quite a lot of UV due to the high filament temperature. I actually used one of these working lamps quite recently. Complete with UV shield glass and everything but not that it mattered much at the time as I was doing welding work at the moment wich itself emits LOTS of UV. I was repairing a mixing machine at work that had started leaking after been mixing abrasive polishing compound for many years so the bottom was about to go out and create a total mess! (Around 1 m3 of polishing compound dumped on the floor) but fixed it before that happened luckily! Now its patched up for some more years of abrasive mixing at least! :). That lamp came really in handy then as the mixer is situated in a dark corner of the factory. LED is more efficiend but indeed still cant compare in color spectrum and color temperature is often a bit cold in comaprison although decent warm white LED lamps exist now where this is important.

    • @Sparky-ww5re
      @Sparky-ww5re ปีที่แล้ว

      The UV emmited from halogen is nothing compared to the UV from a mercury vapor or metal halide bulb that continues to light with the outer glass broken. Years ago there were incidents where people suffered severe eye and skin burns in school gymnasiums where a lamp was stuck by a ball and partially broken. As a result special lamps that consist of a thin strip of metal connecting to one end of the arc tube that burns up and disconnects within 15 minutes of air exposure, became available and recommended for use in gymnasiums and similar environments. These are known by different names depending on lamp manufacturer, like Self Extinguishing, safety, or Type T lamps. Fortunately in this day and age this is not an issue because new schools use LED, and many existing schools have already converted their HID high bays to LED.

    • @psirvent8
      @psirvent8 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Sparky-ww5reMercury vapor and metal halide bulbs emit a lot of UVC rays just like arc welding and germicidal lamps do.
      This is actually what causes eye burns known as arc flash by welders.
      The outer glass envelope of MV/MH bulbs blocks UVC as can any ordinary glass window by the way however it still lets out UVA rays which tend to cause eye strain rather than burns and are known to cause ARMD, cataracts and melanomas.
      Halogen bulbs on the other end emit mostly UVA in addition to the visible light and infrared rays.

  • @DreStyle
    @DreStyle ปีที่แล้ว +2

    It's a shame these bulbs are banned...
    I have one on my bed a long tube one around 80 watts, the color is un replaceable
    And I was happy to find someone still selling em
    I bought 15

  • @sirgoatofcheese
    @sirgoatofcheese ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Could you recommend a good PORTABLE spectrometer? I would also like to know the brand and model of the one you use.

  • @TheUncleRuckus
    @TheUncleRuckus ปีที่แล้ว +4

    The glass is there to 1) protect the blub from contaminants that could cause it to explode bc these are meant to be Work lights where paint, drywall dust and other stuff you wouldn't want settling on the bulb and 2) to protect the user if the bulb explodes. Bc the last you want is searing hot glass flying towards you.
    I've used halogen work lights daily for 35+ years with several of my lamps have broken front glass and I have never seen any adverse effects.

    • @volodumurkalunyak4651
      @volodumurkalunyak4651 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      And as we see here:
      3. Glass is also there to filter out harmfull UV.

    • @hashbrown777
      @hashbrown777 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@volodumurkalunyak4651no, it isn't, that's what he's saying. The uv is negligible, and any tested uv attenuation is incidental

  • @Its-Just-Zip
    @Its-Just-Zip ปีที่แล้ว +6

    In the US we have started to get some high CRI LEDs available at consumer levels. I replace the ones in my bedroom recently with a set that advertised 90% or higher. Granted I'm color blind so I can barely tell the difference to begin with, but they seem to work rather well, especially compared to the lights I previously had in there

    • @stevetalkstoomuch
      @stevetalkstoomuch ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I've been using the FEIT Enhance bulbs for a year now. Much brighter-looking and color rendering is much better. They claim 90-93 CRI, which is obvious when lit. People still think you need to get a bright white bulb to get color contrast, but the high CRI bulbs do the same thing, and in warm white 3000K.

  • @BROTRRer
    @BROTRRer ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This video was enlightening

  • @scottd9448
    @scottd9448 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I remember getting a letter from Ikea in the 80's or 90's recalling a halogen desk light that I had. It apparently let out a lot of UV. But I had already discarded it because of the excessive heat radiation it produced.

  • @waldevv
    @waldevv ปีที่แล้ว

    I was glad to throw these kinds of spotlights away as soon as I moved to my new house, the modern LED versions are like 15-20W max and provide just as much light, or at least enough for whatever I need to see in my yard during winter

  • @MiniLuv-1984
    @MiniLuv-1984 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks - great info.
    I'd like to know more about colour temperature of different lighting technologies and our colour perception response. You touched on that with "meat" looking better under halogen lamps and also in the bathroom for skin colour.

  •  6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I'm not sure if it is common, but my R7S 400W lightbulb exploded violently at the end of it's life. Glass protected me. The explosion was so violent, that it caused deep scratches in protective glass. I recommend observing light bulbs and change them if they are becoming darker and have filament bent.

  • @madeintexas3d442
    @madeintexas3d442 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    My dad had one of these we would use when doing touch up paint. It would be set up behind me while working. I remember after painting having a rather bad sunburn without spending time outside. I remember saying that I think the light did it and he said there was no way. It did have a glass cover but was probably from the 60's so who knows.

    • @psirvent8
      @psirvent8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Maybe it was way too close to your body and touch up paint took so many hours that the sole UVA rays (Which are the only ones not to be filtered by the glass and also the least likely to cause sunburns given their low-ish energy) actually managed to get you sunburnt.
      Or maybe it was a burn caused by the heat alone, who knows ?

  • @computerguy7451
    @computerguy7451 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Where Did You Get The Light Spectrum Device That You Can Plug Into Your Laptop?

    • @logitech4873
      @logitech4873 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Why are you capitalising the first letter in every word?

    • @computerguy7451
      @computerguy7451 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@logitech4873 Idk, I forgot

  • @JJceo
    @JJceo ปีที่แล้ว +1

    As I kid I hated those halogen fixtures because they never stood upright without trying to fall over. Trying to catch them, they’d burn you.

  • @agentorange2618
    @agentorange2618 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Can you test a smartphone flashlight's CRI?

  • @jimtekkit
    @jimtekkit ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I used to have one of these 400W halogens in the roof as a light source for the rare times I would be up there. But I removed it due to the concern of accidentally knocking it over and setting the house on fire. They're basically a free-standing furnace. Now I use multiple LED globes that in total consume less than one tenth of the power of the halogen.

  • @photonik-luminescence
    @photonik-luminescence ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Cool 1500W lamps ! Didnt know they made 1000w into 500W sized bulbsall this time after collecting some old-stock bulbs my self. It would be wounderfull if you mke a video about the 1500W ones and 1000W ones. The fact that halogens produce UV is funny. T think that the reptile-halogen lights werent joking when saying about UV-A and UV-B. Maybe you should try a reptile-halogen light. They tend to also include the spectrum on thepackage but a real test would be cool. And as usually a great and reasearched video ! Keep it up with interesting light nulbs !

  • @randomusername509
    @randomusername509 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Is the UVB/C output of these small lamps so dangerous that you have had to wear gloves etc? Is it more powerful than a sun during a normal spring-summer day?

    • @app0the
      @app0the ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I assume the gloves and thick clothes are more for protection from glass shards in case the lightbulb explodes, which halogen bulbs love to do

    • @Peter_A1466
      @Peter_A1466 ปีที่แล้ว

      There is no UVC in sunlight, as it is blocked by the atmosphere. Only artificial lights emit UVC.

  • @kendexter
    @kendexter ปีที่แล้ว +2

    what about those people working in big gardening houses and green houses with full spectrum lights for the flowering atum simulated

    • @psirvent8
      @psirvent8 ปีที่แล้ว

      They probably have special glasses or goggles as even a sodium lamp can hurt the eyes according to some articles I found on the web (Despite not emitting that much UV compared to metal halide or mercury vapor lamps).

  • @PsRohrbaugh
    @PsRohrbaugh ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Banning incandescent bulbs is so frustrating. Nobody is using them unless they have a really good reason, due to the cost savings of better technology.

  • @dalekallio4619
    @dalekallio4619 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Halogens that are unfiltered have damaged my vision. Improperly installed Halogen lamps in automobiles are a dangerous nuisance. Their angle to pedestrians is often dangerous.

    • @psirvent8
      @psirvent8 ปีที่แล้ว

      What kind of damage did you get ?

  • @diogor420
    @diogor420 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    What USB light spectrometer do you use?

    • @brainiac75
      @brainiac75  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It is a Lasertack LR2. I think it is more or less an ASEQ Instruments LR1 rebranded for the European market. Works really well though. I need to try building a spectrometer myself in a future video... May not be as stable and precise as the LR2 but for hobby use a home-built can be quite good. Thanks for watching!

    • @diogor420
      @diogor420 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@brainiac75 Thank you!

  • @psirvent8
    @psirvent8 ปีที่แล้ว

    I remember having taken a 850W halogen bulb from a laser printer back a few years ago and whenever I turned it on I felt my eyes getting strained despite not looking directly at that artificial sun of a bulb.
    Also looking at the light with a window between me and the bulb didn't change anything.
    Therefore I asked for advice on a forum and got replies saying that it definitely puts out UV and that since it wasn't designed for lighting rooms, the manufacturer might as well have cut the costs on doping the quartz to block UV radiation.
    I also ran the blacklight test on it and found that it didn't glow at all, however it's worth mentioning that no R7S bulb I know of glows under a blacklight, which means it definitely puts out UV just like the bulb from the printer did.
    But and this is where it gets weird to me I don't remember having gotten any eye strain or sore from a R7S bulb, not even a 500W one with no glass in front of it.
    Back a few years ago I assumed it must have a coating on it (Even though it doesn't glow under a blacklight unlike some small capsules or reflector bulbs that glow the same blue as tonic water under a blacklight) unlike the printer bulb but this video proves me that nope !
    They just let out the entire spectrum from the filament just like the printer bulb might have done.