As far as the self-awareness test... depends on the species... my husky was so self aware that, even as a pup, he could detect when another male was beating their chest metaphorically. In high school, I had a friend who was around 6' tall and chonky, he was walking in my doggo's chain reach and said "I could kick this dog's ass.", to my at the time mid grown husky pup (he grew to be around 5'9" standing on his back paws and weighed around 129 lbs when he was fully grown, but, at the time was somewhere around 50 lbs and not near that tall on his hind legs). My good boy stopped eating his kibble (which he had a very high metabolism, for him to stop eating meant that he was noticing something he considered MAJOR), looked over at my friend who was standing with his back to my pupper... and then proceeded to run up, snout to the ground, knock my friend's legs out from under him, make my friend do a flip in the air and land flat on his ass, and then wrapped my friend up in his chain and started to lick my friend into submission.... Later that same dog became aware of how tensile strength works on log chains and repeatedly pulled against the log chain that held him (yeah, I know, having a dog on a chain is bad, but, I was a kid, it was a different time, and the neighbors were a threat to my doggo's life and he was NOT an inside dog by any means of the word, not by preference nor build). He'd tug and tug in just the right way to break a specific link in the chain by wearing it down. We knew that this was calculated because it was only specific links in the chain which had that wear and tear. Even later, he became aware that he could simply undo the collar around his neck and run free without breaking anything.... we were not going to put a choke chain on him because, even in that time when it was considered acceptable to chain a dog up, we did not agree with choke chains or shock collars. It's at this point that we just... well, we had to keep the chain on him because neighbors had threatened to shoot him (yeah, this was in the back woods, but, there were neighbors relatively close... and... I mean... whenever a good doggo visited us, we just gave it a treat, petted it as if to say hi, and then let them go about their affairs elsewhere just like if a neighbor was visiting... the fact that they would want to shoot our dog who was very good natured is telling, in retrospect). At that point, the whole chain and collar thing became more or less an honor system. He understood the importance of wearing both to keep up appearances, but, secretly wasn't bothered by it. Also, he slept like Snoopy... on top of his luxury built dog house (I mean luxury built truly, it was build like a mini house and not just a leaky box with a hole).
Is Anton doing long compilations because he realised some of us with insomnia are putting on his videos on the TV to fall asleep? I'm not saying it's boring, but quite hypnotic.
GG Anton 3 hours!! I would like to think that your videos are shown in many school curriculums. Even in snippets...your content is invaluable to teaching! Much Kudos to you for that. Thank you!
I thoroughly enjoy watching your videos. I usually listen more than watch since I play when attempting housework, however quite often I’ll find myself glued to my bed or sofa watching. Keep up the great content! Viewer from Texas here😁
Year in and year out, I've assloads of adoration for these double feature length compilations; ;a thousand thank yous, Anton, for the "you don't see that every day" dedication you (descriptions be damned), somehow (beats the balls off of me 🤷♂️) evince/exert each and every day. ☺️
My old black cat Lucky passed the self-recognition test. He recognized himself, and noticed a small white dot I'd put on his forehead, brushing it off as soon as he saw it in the mirror. Our other cats failed, one of several test results proving Lucky was vastly more intelligent than average, the feline Einstein.
Let's also remember everybody for every XO planet we find the further away it is we're technically looking at a picture of what that planet looked like that many light years ago. So we are getting a snapshot of the past when looking at other galaxies. Even the light we see from the sun is roughly 8 mins old
On Arrakis: The inhabitants seem to breathe the air right there, so there has to be an Earth- like amount of oxygen. Then I don't understand how this could even form on a desert planet with almost no vegetation whatsoever.
I was watching an 'Event Horizon' video the other day. Thinking about Fermi's Paradox, and the Drake Equation. If the Universe, and time are infinite, or even just so huge that we can't even conceive of the size and depth of these numbers that we speculate on… it seems like there must be so many unknown-unknowns, that the relatively miniscule amount of known variables that we do have feel almost arbitrary. I know that those equations were well-thought-out, and those variables are chosen for very specific reasons. But if our knowledge is as limited as it seems that it has to be, I would say yes. We are only finding keys under the lamps that we built, because that is the only place that we know to look.
Super-Earths on the inner edge of habitable zones will almost certainly have a runaway greenhouse. Conversely, they'll remain habitable much farther out, likely past Mars-relative orbits, because they'll have thick atmospheres and high levels of volcanism.
Worth noting: with the increased complexity of analysis models, lots of data replication and comparative analysis is needed. So, am I describing a growing industry 😁
Hey Anton I was just wondering what your education background is. I love astronomy and everything associated with it but I'm not sure if I should go through post secondary and major in something like astrophysics or if I should just keep it as a hobby and do something else.
I have a degree in automotive technology, half of a BS, plan to go back for a MS in Thermodynamics and then something higher after. I've worked for Apple for 8 years and I have several of my own businesses. I love this stuff and regardless of background -- the more you read -- the more you learn. Anton had his first day, too. I want to get a PHD in QM because when I'm 60, 70 years old -- this crap will be high school (maybe) level of understanding (I'm 37). Point being? Don't let anything stop you from your passion. I have over 200 poems and working on 2 books. How much of what I've done was and has been dictated by my schooling? Need an oil change X-) I have a car design idea that's not an EV and EV's are not going to "save the planet". This isn't a bot or an ad -- I'm just some dude on the internet that found Anton and I'm just getting back up to speed with all of these after a 4 year toxic relationship. I have an eidetic memory that allows me to forget very little -- regardless -- any base in Maths, Physics and/or Chemistry will be a good base. Planetary science and Astrophysics are pretty much the "ground floor" of what he's talking about in most of these video series. So depending on what your base degree is there are a few things you should consider to be effective with your degree choice, IF it's the right choice for you.
We only see more planets around red Dwarfs is because planets around red dwarfs are easier to detect. Bright stars hide the shadow of the planets. Planets could be more common around yellow stars. Its just the detection method we have favours large planets around red dwarfs.
The downside to red dwarfs is that they're extremely dim in comparison to much hotter/larger stars and the behavior of red dwarfs is super unstable and unpredictable with constant solar flares erupting from the surface nearly all the time.
The Arrakis simulation doesn't take into account HOW the water is sealed up, via sandtrout encysting it. AND it also assumes the planet has a major axial tilt. If there is no axial tilt, the climate will not have seasons, and the poles will never experience direct overhead sunlight. Those details would immensely affect the global climate.
I usually only listen to TH-cam...and I thought the algorithm finally understood me...great video after video auto-playing. Nope, it was a compilation.
01:38:36 I thought planets aren't supposed to be rigid to any significant degree regardless of whether they're rocky or gaseous, since the very definition of a planet implies that its shape & structure is governed by gravity, not rigid mechanical forces
Maybe the astronomers should speak in terms of a planet's ability to resist tidal forces. Rigidity actually does fit though. It's easier to distort the shape of a gas giant.
Begs the question then. Have we still not properly defined what a planet is ? My assumption would be any orbiting body that effects it’s parent stars orbit.
@@rolandthethompsongunner64 Yeah, more or less. I mean, any object, no matter how small, is going to cause some effect in a star's motion. But a planet is typically thought of as a body that's grown large enough to be gravitationally forced into a basically round shape and start to differentiate into various layers structurally.
@@booklover6753 Rigidity is only significant locally (i.e. mountains & valleys), but on a global scale, only gravity/rotation/tidal forces are significant. Rigidity might play only a minuscule role in resisting changing the shape of the planet (i.e. the Moon's tidal forces deform the Earth's crust to a lesser degree than the oceans, but if the Earth entered the Roche limit of a much more massive/dense object, you can be sure that not only would the Earth's atmosphere & oceans be stripped away, but the planet itself would be ripped apart in its entirety).
In No Man's Sky I recently found an earthlike exoplanet that was also very exotic like Pandora from avatar. From orbit it looks identical to earth, and if you land during the day it would be easy to mistake it for earth. Green grass, blue skies/water, and a lush biome. Upon setting foot on the planet you realize the grass is reactive. It changes colors as you walk on it. Undistubed the grass is green, but in reality it's actually green, blue, and red as you walk along. Then my spacesuit ai chimes in with a gravitational anomaly warning. The next thing I know the gravity "storm" is upon me and the normal earthlike gravity has been reduced by a factor of 10 or more. I try my jetpack and sure enough I am able to fly indefinitely and easily obtain near orbit heights. Then it get's dark and I see as I make my decent that nearly every species of flora and fauna on this world is bioluminescent with every color imaginable. During the day it's so like earth it's uncanny, but at night it turns into Pandora. Not sure if it's a new feature or not, but "gravitational anomaly" storms are incredibly rare. I've never even seen a TH-camr make a video about them.
Anton, the artist's painting is terrible unrealistic. The shadow is not like we have seen in pictures. The Cassini probe got some very nice pictures of Saturn.
@@rolandthethompsongunner64 On a more serious note, I would guess that such a planet would have a much smaller iron core. The Earth does have an unusually large core compared to the other terrestrial planets, with the possible exception of Venus. The really large moons found around the outer planets are also really low in density, implying that they also are lacking a high density large core like the Earths'.
At 54:39 The planet HD3157 c that has a polar orbit, my suspicion would be that while HD3167 and HD3167 d where on the backside of the sun (from the videos perspective at that time stamp but in actuality it would not matter so long as both of those planets are on the opposite side of the sun from HD 3167 c) So with the other 2 on one side of the sun and that planet not, if something large or with very high gravity and mass such as a small but strong Rogue Black Hole or Rogue Planet that was moving quite fast and at a Diagonal angle to the system passing over the sun (so basically a 50% angle to the plane of the system itself and passing slightly to the top right side of the sun on its way out of the system) so as it passed by its gravity was strong enough to cause HD 3167 c to Tack and alter its orbit to be a polar orbit. So while the Black Hole was close it was not totally in the system but still traveling very fast that's why it didn't pull a planet completely out of its orbit and the system, or maybe it did pull another planet completely out of orbit to consume who knows at this point, but for 3167 c it just had enough pull to alter its orbit then it was out of the system or far enough away to not affect things much more and any minor effects most likely stabilized themselves out over a few orbits.
It's difficult to believe that their theory is sound, especially the transiting body's size so, considering the distance the opportunity to catch a transit would take nano-seconds!
I don't think a planet could become conscious itself, but I suppose a technologically advanced species could construct an artificial intelligence that represents and speaks on behalf of the planet, perhaps even taking on the persona of the planet itself. It would be cool if Earth had something like that..... maybe.
Alien AI? Man everyone is obsessed with this stuff. I mean -- would that be how a sentient being would "monitor" a planet? Sounds a little "big brother" to me. It's possible, but I would like to think a sentient species beyond our technology wouldn't "care" to monitor because when we get outside of our "sand box" there's probably not going to be much fighting over the sand (resources) in the new box as long as the right people are leading (and controlling/manipulating) the innovation forward.
Ok. Thanks Anton. But 50 years to the next star is absolutely not possible. More like 100,000 years with better technology than we have now. Always stay optimistic but I rely on you for the truth about the universe. Please do a video on this laser technology. Love you wonderful person.
It is possible. You just have to think outside the box. We won't have the ability to travel to the stars until the human brain can map out the solar system that is beyond the space-time continuum. Humans would need to be able to look them up, forward and behind them at once by just looking at the stars. . There is a way to get to Mars and Venus with gravity. If you are lighter than air then you will float up to Venus. If you wanna go to Mars you must have to be heavier than lead and radiation or radio waves.
Do you have any idea when is jwst team going to release the new information about the universe to the public ? I just can't wait.... Hubble telescope is taking images of the universe for 30 years but hasn't it taken image of the whole sky 4π steradians? Will James Webb be able to scan the whole sky in its 20 years lifetime? How much solid angle does one picture of james webb cover? I want to divide the 4π steradian angle by that angle so that I can know how many pictures webb need to take to make a 3D map of the whole sky? Webb recently discovered a galaxy named Glass z-12 (300 years after the big bang in the publicly released picture of abell 2711, but why you have not covered that news in your video on this channel? Moreover I can't find the formula of how astronomers convert redshift value ( eg z = 12 ) to the time after big bang (like z= 11 means 400 million years after the big bang and z=12 means 300 million years after the big bang) ? What information has Glass z12 given to us about the early universe? Please kindly reply to the above curious questions.
@@booklover6753 If you are in contact with any jwst officials, would you please ask them what JWST is currently pointing at , and what is the area of the first JWST image ( Smacs wide deep field) because it took 12 hours to complete that image. If you kindly tell me the solid angle steradian area of that image, it will help me in carrying out the calculations to know how much time JWST need to catupe the picture of the whole sky
@@physicslover1950I'm not in contact with anyone on the JWST team. I'm just a regular person like yourself. The JWST has several websites that are publicly available for your perusal. I have been an astronomer for many years though, and I can help you to maybe understand the general characteristics of how telescopes work. For instance, the typical JWST image I think is only a few arc minutes wide in field of view, so capturing the entire night sky would require many thousands of images. The JWST has a focal length of about 430 feet and a clear aperture of about 21 feet, so the FOV is pretty narrow with an F value of about 20.5.
We are just part of a larger cell, notice the similarities between atoms, planets and galaxies! The big bang, just like an egg growing and dividing. So my question is this, On a scale of 1 to 1000, if 1 represents and atom and 1000 represents say a galaxy, where would we fit on the size spectrum. Most people would assume in the middle somewhere, but it true reality, we are probably in the 2 to 3 range.
Water As A liquid ( tipped balance) or natural planetary collision, acts or instills that.... Molecular Bond etc .. it fights to stay liquid.. fluidic!
Computerized celestial based triangulation techniques can get your position down to a matter of feet. Before the advent of gps, many precision military systems used this - as late as the 60’s and 70’s. Coupled with internal navigation techniques - this is sufficient to provide a check against gps accuracy. It’s moot anyway as the answer to gps spoofing is to utilize a public key cryptography techniques transmitted with the signal in an upgrade to the us gps protocol. EU and other newer gps systems already do this - see osnma.
It's crazy even humans cannot pass the self recognition test ..I once drawn a nob and glasses on my mates forehead when he passed out one night and when he woke up he never noticed 🤔
Dark matter is not required to explain any of the 'anomalies'. I fail to understand why they associate gravity lensing with matter being present anyway. And faster spinning galaxy arms... People chose 'invisible' matter and MOND just because it seems the simplest solution to them.
Red Dawrf's hummm, ok It's cold outside There's no kind of atmosphere I'm all alone, more or less Let me fly far away from here Fun fun fun, in the sun sun sun I want to lie, shipwrecked and comatose Drinking fresh mango juice Gold fish shoals nibbling at my toes Fun fun fun in the sun sun sun Fun fun fun in the sun sun sun I pack my bags and head into hyperspace Where I'll succeed at time warp speeds Spend my days in ultraviolet rays Fun fun fun, in the sun sun sun We'll lock on course straight through the universe You and me and the galaxy Reach the stage where hyper-drive's engaged Fun fun fun, in the sun sun sun Fun fun fun, in the sun sun sun
So with ai we can tease all this spectrographic information out of it's starlight quicker. We need spectrographs down to the quantum limit for earth sized stars and earth sized masses as we have so far found the easy ones. Like massive Jupiter masses right near the star, and stars just above brown dwarfs thus skewing our search results. To find more earth limits we need better instruments, all hidden in the starlight to see that which at present is not seeable. Progress marches on sir.
The answer lies in complexity. Gravity is not predictable anymore in complex gravitational environments. This Galaxy has an unusual low amount of complexity. This leads to very little unexplained gravity. It is predictable.
Anton, I absolutely LOVE your content, but it is often hard to hear clearly and exactly what you are saying. Sometimes you speak too fast, sometimes too indistinctly. Your voice needs to sound crispier and with less bass.
The amount of power that they've suggested these laser sail type engines is an absurd amount of energy mankind will not make enough power to take this thing and send it for 50 years the amount they suggest is ridiculous absurdly huge out of any proportion to what they want to carryout It's magical thinking!!!
If you ask me, a planet thats protects itself is concious and a planet that doesn't respond to outside stimuli is a dead planet such as mars. It doesn't even have a magnetic field to sheild itself from radiation.
How does anyone even know if ANY of these super-distant objects even still exist? All this effort studying that which May all have disappeared billions of years ago.
I just don’t understand why all this massive effort to achieve the unachievable (eg traveling to Alpha Centauri) isn’t redirected to saving the planet we already have? Billions of dollars and the biggest of minds, all employed on the practically irrelevant. Makes no sense. Imagine what could be achieved if the goals were changed.
I find the artist’s renderings of planets that have never been seen disingenuous. TRUTH: We don’t have a way to get there just yet. OR know if what’s there will support human life. Please don’t get me wrong, I’m interested in both astronomy and engineering it just seems too far in distance, technical ability and political will.
Sadly until faithless scientists concede and learn from those who understand spiritual sciences the overarching understanding must be acknowledged the quantum breaks down due to the ability of the sentient observer and nothing else. We can create with words thoughts observations bring into existence anything. We also eventually once again will have non vestigial senses of hyper vision and collective consciousness and thought. Yes the universe is conscious. We are were and will be again stars observing creation. potentially. In reality they actually know next to nothing if I literally had to admit hey I'm a physicist but can only with any legitimacy explain a massive whooping four percent of my alleged specialty while having to admit well the universe is mostly this at a rate nearly 60-70 percent of the whole friggin universe but we have no clue what it is what it does etc..oh yeah and the second majority that takes up nearly 1/4 of everything but hey once again no clue what it is does came from etc...but hey hey they can claim they know that 4 percent that's matter which even a child understands..so it's infuriating and angry when in their perpetual arrogance they snipe at anyone else who have theories these wizzes who grasp that whopping 4% only feel qualified and that it's ok to chastise these conspiracy theories which incidentally is precisely the word used when Physics first began spreading new ideas. Irony at its best but hey maybe with another few centuries you might get to explaining a massive five percent. It's literally arrogance epitomy comparably to standing on your backyard and thinking you can in any way understand or see anything a continent away. Think Sarah Palin who could apparently see Russia from her backyard. So ask yourself arrogant scientists do you really want to be thought of being like Sarah Palin? Exactly. Grow from Love scientists and if you truly do want understanding I strongly suggest you study the Hindu texts particularly parts regarding the Yuga cycles and also those on Vimana technology and the nuts bolts diagrams of them. 😊
Taking a short break to spend time with the family. Enjoy the compilations!
enjoy your time with your family, bro :)
Have a great time buddy. I think you’ve earned it mate. 😉👍
Hey these are pretty cool!
Happy Enjoyment of the Holidays to You & your family!
Happy new year!
These planets with short and obviously fast orbits,
Would we people of earth feel the centrifugation force.
Hot damn. Three hours of Astronomical Anton!
As far as the self-awareness test... depends on the species... my husky was so self aware that, even as a pup, he could detect when another male was beating their chest metaphorically. In high school, I had a friend who was around 6' tall and chonky, he was walking in my doggo's chain reach and said "I could kick this dog's ass.", to my at the time mid grown husky pup (he grew to be around 5'9" standing on his back paws and weighed around 129 lbs when he was fully grown, but, at the time was somewhere around 50 lbs and not near that tall on his hind legs). My good boy stopped eating his kibble (which he had a very high metabolism, for him to stop eating meant that he was noticing something he considered MAJOR), looked over at my friend who was standing with his back to my pupper... and then proceeded to run up, snout to the ground, knock my friend's legs out from under him, make my friend do a flip in the air and land flat on his ass, and then wrapped my friend up in his chain and started to lick my friend into submission....
Later that same dog became aware of how tensile strength works on log chains and repeatedly pulled against the log chain that held him (yeah, I know, having a dog on a chain is bad, but, I was a kid, it was a different time, and the neighbors were a threat to my doggo's life and he was NOT an inside dog by any means of the word, not by preference nor build). He'd tug and tug in just the right way to break a specific link in the chain by wearing it down. We knew that this was calculated because it was only specific links in the chain which had that wear and tear.
Even later, he became aware that he could simply undo the collar around his neck and run free without breaking anything.... we were not going to put a choke chain on him because, even in that time when it was considered acceptable to chain a dog up, we did not agree with choke chains or shock collars. It's at this point that we just... well, we had to keep the chain on him because neighbors had threatened to shoot him (yeah, this was in the back woods, but, there were neighbors relatively close... and... I mean... whenever a good doggo visited us, we just gave it a treat, petted it as if to say hi, and then let them go about their affairs elsewhere just like if a neighbor was visiting... the fact that they would want to shoot our dog who was very good natured is telling, in retrospect). At that point, the whole chain and collar thing became more or less an honor system. He understood the importance of wearing both to keep up appearances, but, secretly wasn't bothered by it.
Also, he slept like Snoopy... on top of his luxury built dog house (I mean luxury built truly, it was build like a mini house and not just a leaky box with a hole).
Is Anton doing long compilations because he realised some of us with insomnia are putting on his videos on the TV to fall asleep? I'm not saying it's boring, but quite hypnotic.
As a cognitive dreamer, I can actually keep listening and learning while sleeping.
Self aware planet?
OK, you lost me.
Guilty
@@Ken-rq9xr I learned general and special relativity this way
It is'nt just interresting to listen to, while falling asleep. It's also great to wake up to :)
Wonderful as always anton. Thank you. 👍😁
Anton even on time when taking the day off. 💯
Your videos are fantastic and I'm so glad to have found them. Stay wonderful!
Omg I've been missing out on Anton's posts and BAM his subscribership has been up since last time I checked in, good for you dude! Proud of you!
GG Anton 3 hours!! I would like to think that your videos are shown in many school curriculums. Even in snippets...your content is invaluable to teaching! Much Kudos to you for that. Thank you!
finally, a channel that just doesnt clickbait the james webb telescope 24/7
Wow, 3 hours. I love Anton!
Their repeats all clogged into one video. Nothing new.
I thoroughly enjoy watching your videos. I usually listen more than watch since I play when attempting housework, however quite often I’ll find myself glued to my bed or sofa watching. Keep up the great content! Viewer from Texas here😁
This type of video is my favorite to listen before the sleep comes!
For sure new tecknology has made science fun again
Agree😊
Congrats again on 1 million!!
Year in and year out, I've assloads of adoration for these double feature length compilations; ;a thousand thank yous, Anton, for the "you don't see that every day" dedication you (descriptions be damned), somehow (beats the balls off of me 🤷♂️) evince/exert each and every day. ☺️
I absolutely love your channel Sir.
Thanks so much Anton.... 3rd night running on looooong videos. Cool, but I'm getting low on coffee.
These are keepers! Good and long.
My old black cat Lucky passed the self-recognition test. He recognized himself, and noticed a small white dot I'd put on his forehead, brushing it off as soon as he saw it in the mirror.
Our other cats failed, one of several test results proving Lucky was vastly more intelligent than average, the feline Einstein.
Let's also remember everybody for every XO planet we find the further away it is we're technically looking at a picture of what that planet looked like that many light years ago. So we are getting a snapshot of the past when looking at other galaxies. Even the light we see from the sun is roughly 8 mins old
Well. Yeah. But that is the same if you look at your girlfriend. What you see is what she looked like a few milliseconds ago. The past. ROFL!
Thanks for compilation-- Enjoy your well deserved time off!
Hello wonderful Anton.
On Arrakis: The inhabitants seem to breathe the air right there, so there has to be an Earth- like amount of oxygen.
Then I don't understand how this could even form on a desert planet with almost no vegetation whatsoever.
You never miss! Cant wait to see what we learn from you in 2023! Thanks as always Mr. Petrov! Hello Wonderful Anton, this is person!
I could listen to Anton all day, he is amazing at getting the Imformation out there. He’s an Imformation steam train 🇦🇺🤘✨🌌
Are we finding keys only under lamp posts because that's the main place that we can see?
I was watching an 'Event Horizon' video the other day. Thinking about Fermi's Paradox, and the Drake Equation. If the Universe, and time are infinite, or even just so huge that we can't even conceive of the size and depth of these numbers that we speculate on… it seems like there must be so many unknown-unknowns, that the relatively miniscule amount of known variables that we do have feel almost arbitrary.
I know that those equations were well-thought-out, and those variables are chosen for very specific reasons. But if our knowledge is as limited as it seems that it has to be, I would say yes. We are only finding keys under the lamps that we built, because that is the only place that we know to look.
Super-Earths on the inner edge of habitable zones will almost certainly have a runaway greenhouse.
Conversely, they'll remain habitable much farther out, likely past Mars-relative orbits, because they'll have thick atmospheres and high levels of volcanism.
Nice one Anton
Worth noting: with the increased complexity of analysis models, lots of data replication and comparative analysis is needed. So, am I describing a growing industry 😁
You are a Great mediator. Please don't forget us.
Great video
Hey Anton I was just wondering what your education background is. I love astronomy and everything associated with it but I'm not sure if I should go through post secondary and major in something like astrophysics or if I should just keep it as a hobby and do something else.
I have a degree in automotive technology, half of a BS, plan to go back for a MS in Thermodynamics and then something higher after. I've worked for Apple for 8 years and I have several of my own businesses. I love this stuff and regardless of background -- the more you read -- the more you learn. Anton had his first day, too. I want to get a PHD in QM because when I'm 60, 70 years old -- this crap will be high school (maybe) level of understanding (I'm 37). Point being? Don't let anything stop you from your passion. I have over 200 poems and working on 2 books. How much of what I've done was and has been dictated by my schooling? Need an oil change X-)
I have a car design idea that's not an EV and EV's are not going to "save the planet".
This isn't a bot or an ad -- I'm just some dude on the internet that found Anton and I'm just getting back up to speed with all of these after a 4 year toxic relationship. I have an eidetic memory that allows me to forget very little -- regardless -- any base in Maths, Physics and/or Chemistry will be a good base. Planetary science and Astrophysics are pretty much the "ground floor" of what he's talking about in most of these video series. So depending on what your base degree is there are a few things you should consider to be effective with your degree choice, IF it's the right choice for you.
We only see more planets around red Dwarfs is because planets around red dwarfs are easier to detect. Bright stars hide the shadow of the planets. Planets could be more common around yellow stars. Its just the detection method we have favours large planets around red dwarfs.
The downside to red dwarfs is that they're extremely dim in comparison to much hotter/larger stars and the behavior of red dwarfs is super unstable and unpredictable with constant solar flares erupting from the surface nearly all the time.
One way a tidally locked planet is being a hyper rotator the gas moves fast enough to disperse the heat.
Ah, so we found Arrakis around Proxima. Excellent.
Soon I shall become the Kwisatz Haderach! ;D
I need that solar flow chart
The Arrakis simulation doesn't take into account HOW the water is sealed up, via sandtrout encysting it. AND it also assumes the planet has a major axial tilt. If there is no axial tilt, the climate will not have seasons, and the poles will never experience direct overhead sunlight.
Those details would immensely affect the global climate.
Oh yeah, discovering planets by enjoying espresso is for me! Where do I sign up to become an astrobarrista?! 🥰
Not average, but unremarkable! LoL
BTW, good job on fluency!
So interesting. Imagine what could be out there that we haven't seen yet
We're getting compiled guys, gals, and other pals
I like that.. guys, gals, and other pals.
My dog appreciates your inclusion.. >_>
Tau Cetian pals. 😉
@@MichaelOfRohan ☜ (↼_↼) heyyyy, why does it sound like your dog _doesn't_ actually appreciate being included? Are you bein' _suspicious?_
I usually only listen to TH-cam...and I thought the algorithm finally understood me...great video after video auto-playing.
Nope, it was a compilation.
01:38:36 I thought planets aren't supposed to be rigid to any significant degree regardless of whether they're rocky or gaseous, since the very definition of a planet implies that its shape & structure is governed by gravity, not rigid mechanical forces
Maybe the astronomers should speak in terms of a planet's ability to resist tidal forces. Rigidity actually does fit though. It's easier to distort the shape of a gas giant.
Begs the question then. Have we still not properly defined what a planet is ? My assumption would be any orbiting body that effects it’s parent stars orbit.
@@rolandthethompsongunner64 Yeah, more or less. I mean, any object, no matter how small, is going to cause some effect in a star's motion. But a planet is typically thought of as a body that's grown large enough to be gravitationally forced into a basically round shape and start to differentiate into various layers structurally.
@@booklover6753 Rigidity is only significant locally (i.e. mountains & valleys), but on a global scale, only gravity/rotation/tidal forces are significant. Rigidity might play only a minuscule role in resisting changing the shape of the planet (i.e. the Moon's tidal forces deform the Earth's crust to a lesser degree than the oceans, but if the Earth entered the Roche limit of a much more massive/dense object, you can be sure that not only would the Earth's atmosphere & oceans be stripped away, but the planet itself would be ripped apart in its entirety).
My god Anton how can I sleep to your content when I have to pay attention to you for more than 10 min jk goatted
Feels like I'm in an xwing fighter flying down the channel of the Dearh Star waiting to drop a photon torpedo down the ventilation duct.
In No Man's Sky I recently found an earthlike exoplanet that was also very exotic like Pandora from avatar. From orbit it looks identical to earth, and if you land during the day it would be easy to mistake it for earth. Green grass, blue skies/water, and a lush biome. Upon setting foot on the planet you realize the grass is reactive. It changes colors as you walk on it. Undistubed the grass is green, but in reality it's actually green, blue, and red as you walk along. Then my spacesuit ai chimes in with a gravitational anomaly warning. The next thing I know the gravity "storm" is upon me and the normal earthlike gravity has been reduced by a factor of 10 or more. I try my jetpack and sure enough I am able to fly indefinitely and easily obtain near orbit heights. Then it get's dark and I see as I make my decent that nearly every species of flora and fauna on this world is bioluminescent with every color imaginable. During the day it's so like earth it's uncanny, but at night it turns into Pandora.
Not sure if it's a new feature or not, but "gravitational anomaly" storms are incredibly rare. I've never even seen a TH-camr make a video about them.
Anton, the artist's painting is terrible unrealistic. The shadow is not like we have seen in pictures. The Cassini probe got some very nice pictures of Saturn.
Can three point be used as a form propetual motion in space
Yeah!!
So a terrestrial planet almost the mass of Earth but weighs less than Mars ?
What would it be made of chalk ?
Maybe a bunch of those lava rocks like the ones you can buy for landscaping. You know, the ones that can float. LOL!
@@booklover6753 Igneous rock. Interesting!
@@rolandthethompsongunner64 On a more serious note, I would guess that such a planet would have a much smaller iron core. The Earth does have an unusually large core compared to the other terrestrial planets, with the possible exception of Venus. The really large moons found around the outer planets are also really low in density, implying that they also are lacking a high density large core like the Earths'.
Love 💕 it
At 54:39 The planet HD3157 c that has a polar orbit, my suspicion would be that while HD3167 and HD3167 d where on the backside of the sun (from the videos perspective at that time stamp but in actuality it would not matter so long as both of those planets are on the opposite side of the sun from HD 3167 c) So with the other 2 on one side of the sun and that planet not, if something large or with very high gravity and mass such as a small but strong Rogue Black Hole or Rogue Planet that was moving quite fast and at a Diagonal angle to the system passing over the sun (so basically a 50% angle to the plane of the system itself and passing slightly to the top right side of the sun on its way out of the system) so as it passed by its gravity was strong enough to cause HD 3167 c to Tack and alter its orbit to be a polar orbit. So while the Black Hole was close it was not totally in the system but still traveling very fast that's why it didn't pull a planet completely out of its orbit and the system, or maybe it did pull another planet completely out of orbit to consume who knows at this point, but for 3167 c it just had enough pull to alter its orbit then it was out of the system or far enough away to not affect things much more and any minor effects most likely stabilized themselves out over a few orbits.
It's difficult to believe that their theory is sound, especially the transiting body's size so, considering the distance the opportunity to catch a transit would take nano-seconds!
People are self aware 😂 good one Anton!😂 Wow! Intelligence on this planet, you are killing me 😂
The Annunaki are coming back 👍
According to a fan forum Arrakis might not have axial tilt.
Anything about moons orbiting those planets? 🤔
Sure, I'm ready for the evolution of humanity to planetary consciousness..!
I don't think a planet could become conscious itself, but I suppose a technologically advanced species could construct an artificial intelligence that represents and speaks on behalf of the planet, perhaps even taking on the persona of the planet itself. It would be cool if Earth had something like that..... maybe.
Alien AI? Man everyone is obsessed with this stuff. I mean -- would that be how a sentient being would "monitor" a planet?
Sounds a little "big brother" to me. It's possible, but I would like to think a sentient species beyond our technology wouldn't "care" to monitor because when we get outside of our "sand box" there's probably not going to be much fighting over the sand (resources) in the new box as long as the right people are leading (and controlling/manipulating) the innovation forward.
Won't Webb be able to see these planet, it's basically on our door step and it's not a bright star?
Ok. Thanks Anton. But 50 years to the next star is absolutely not possible. More like 100,000 years with better technology than we have now. Always stay optimistic but I rely on you for the truth about the universe. Please do a video on this laser technology. Love you wonderful person.
It is possible. You just have to think outside the box. We won't have the ability to travel to the stars until the human brain can map out the solar system that is beyond the space-time continuum. Humans would need to be able to look them up, forward and behind them at once by just looking at the stars.
.
There is a way to get to Mars and Venus with gravity. If you are lighter than air then you will float up to Venus. If you wanna go to Mars you must have to be heavier than lead and radiation or radio waves.
Some humans pass the test and some don’t!
❤️👍
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
Do you have any idea when is jwst team going to release the new information about the universe to the public ? I just can't wait....
Hubble telescope is taking images of the universe for 30 years but hasn't it taken image of the whole sky 4π steradians?
Will James Webb be able to scan the whole sky in its 20 years lifetime? How much solid angle does one picture of james webb cover? I want to divide the 4π steradian angle by that angle so that I can know how many pictures webb need to take to make a 3D map of the whole sky?
Webb recently discovered a galaxy named Glass z-12 (300 years after the big bang in the publicly released picture of abell 2711, but why you have not covered that news in your video on this channel? Moreover I can't find the formula of how astronomers convert redshift value ( eg z = 12 ) to the time after big bang (like z= 11 means 400 million years after the big bang and z=12 means 300 million years after the big bang) ?
What information has Glass z12 given to us about the early universe?
Please kindly reply to the above curious questions.
You know that Anton is on vacation, right?
@@booklover6753 No I didn't know... I'm really sorry 😞
@@physicslover1950 No worries my friend. LOL! The JWST has a very narrow field of view and would need many observing runs to map the entire sky.
@@booklover6753 If you are in contact with any jwst officials, would you please ask them what JWST is currently pointing at , and what is the area of the first JWST image ( Smacs wide deep field) because it took 12 hours to complete that image. If you kindly tell me the solid angle steradian area of that image, it will help me in carrying out the calculations to know how much time JWST need to catupe the picture of the whole sky
@@physicslover1950I'm not in contact with anyone on the JWST team. I'm just a regular person like yourself. The JWST has several websites that are publicly available for your perusal. I have been an astronomer for many years though, and I can help you to maybe understand the general characteristics of how telescopes work. For instance, the typical JWST image I think is only a few arc minutes wide in field of view, so capturing the entire night sky would require many thousands of images. The JWST has a focal length of about 430 feet and a clear aperture of about 21 feet, so the FOV is pretty narrow with an F value of about 20.5.
We are just part of a larger cell, notice the similarities between atoms, planets and galaxies! The big bang, just like an egg growing and dividing. So my question is this, On a scale of 1 to 1000, if 1 represents and atom and 1000 represents say a galaxy, where would we fit on the size spectrum. Most people would assume in the middle somewhere, but it true reality, we are probably in the 2 to 3 range.
Water As A liquid ( tipped balance) or natural planetary collision, acts or instills that.... Molecular Bond etc .. it fights to stay liquid.. fluidic!
Computerized celestial based triangulation techniques can get your position down to a matter of feet. Before the advent of gps, many precision military systems used this - as late as the 60’s and 70’s. Coupled with internal navigation techniques - this is sufficient to provide a check against gps accuracy. It’s moot anyway as the answer to gps spoofing is to utilize a public key cryptography techniques transmitted with the signal in an upgrade to the us gps protocol. EU and other newer gps systems already do this - see osnma.
It's crazy even humans cannot pass the self recognition test ..I once drawn a nob and glasses on my mates forehead when he passed out one night and when he woke up he never noticed 🤔
Dark matter is not required to explain any of the 'anomalies'.
I fail to understand why they associate gravity lensing with matter being present anyway.
And faster spinning galaxy arms... People chose 'invisible' matter and MOND just because it seems the simplest solution to them.
So we are going to make ufos for other planets?
WE'RE THE ALIENS
what does G in G-Type stand for? ; Goldilocks???
Red Dawrf's hummm, ok
It's cold outside
There's no kind of atmosphere
I'm all alone, more or less
Let me fly far away from here
Fun fun fun, in the sun sun sun
I want to lie, shipwrecked and comatose
Drinking fresh mango juice
Gold fish shoals nibbling at my toes
Fun fun fun in the sun sun sun
Fun fun fun in the sun sun sun
I pack my bags and head into hyperspace
Where I'll succeed at time warp speeds
Spend my days in ultraviolet rays
Fun fun fun, in the sun sun sun
We'll lock on course straight through the universe
You and me and the galaxy
Reach the stage where hyper-drive's engaged
Fun fun fun, in the sun sun sun
Fun fun fun, in the sun sun sun
"fate if norns' - AA 🤜
Shouldn't it be possible to charge off of trees?
Cymatics. I would like to teach the world to
Wonderful Anton,
Hello!
We are Person! 💞🌌🪐
Wtf does planet awareness have to do with solar system discoveries? Or much of the dwarf star stuff?
You trying to tell me astronomers can see a 40cm wiggle in a star? I think you buy into “the science” too easilly anton.
So with ai we can tease all this spectrographic information out of it's starlight quicker. We need spectrographs down to the quantum limit for earth sized stars and earth sized masses as we have so far found the easy ones. Like massive Jupiter masses right near the star, and stars just above brown dwarfs thus skewing our search results. To find more earth limits we need better instruments, all hidden in the starlight to see that which at present is not seeable. Progress marches on sir.
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
😂😂😂😂like gettin to the street & there It Is: a huge shopping centre Just across the Road & u ddnt know...😂😂😂
The answer lies in complexity. Gravity is not predictable anymore in complex gravitational environments. This Galaxy has an unusual low amount of complexity. This leads to very little unexplained gravity. It is predictable.
Anton, I absolutely LOVE your content, but it is often hard to hear clearly and exactly what you are saying. Sometimes you speak too fast, sometimes too indistinctly. Your voice needs to sound crispier and with less bass.
The amount of power that they've suggested these laser sail type engines is an absurd amount of energy mankind will not make enough power to take this thing and send it for 50 years the amount they suggest is ridiculous absurdly huge out of any proportion to what they want to carryout It's magical thinking!!!
If you ask me, a planet thats protects itself is concious and a planet that doesn't respond to outside stimuli is a dead planet such as mars. It doesn't even have a magnetic field to sheild itself from radiation.
First
A G type star? 😂❤Tell me they're talking about a God star... Without telling me they're talking about a God star!
Intergalactic intelligence deniers are the new flat earthers! 😆
28:25f: > _...the next evolutionary step of a typical planet._
Rather a typical _habitable_ planet.
Which is a minority among all planets.
SLAVA UKRAINE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
💍
How does anyone even know if ANY of these super-distant objects even still exist? All this effort studying that which May all have disappeared billions of years ago.
So get a two children policy global????. Cancerous rabbit for cat lady she wants 8 on invetro???or the one left at the orphanage ??.
If Ukraine fails these word would be just like any other politician:)
Earth is alive. The mind is Ai
The amount of commercial advertisements on this video is disgusting. Knock it off
I just don’t understand why all this massive effort to achieve the unachievable (eg traveling to Alpha Centauri) isn’t redirected to saving the planet we already have? Billions of dollars and the biggest of minds, all employed on the practically irrelevant. Makes no sense. Imagine what could be achieved if the goals were changed.
I find the artist’s renderings of planets that have never been seen disingenuous.
TRUTH:
We don’t have a way to get there just yet.
OR
know if what’s there will support human life.
Please don’t get me wrong, I’m interested in both astronomy and engineering it just seems too far in distance, technical ability and political will.
We barely know anyting..... because anything is possible
Sadly until faithless scientists concede and learn from those who understand spiritual sciences the overarching understanding must be acknowledged the quantum breaks down due to the ability of the sentient observer and nothing else. We can create with words thoughts observations bring into existence anything. We also eventually once again will have non vestigial senses of hyper vision and collective consciousness and thought. Yes the universe is conscious. We are were and will be again stars observing creation. potentially. In reality they actually know next to nothing if I literally had to admit hey I'm a physicist but can only with any legitimacy explain a massive whooping four percent of my alleged specialty while having to admit well the universe is mostly this at a rate nearly 60-70 percent of the whole friggin universe but we have no clue what it is what it does etc..oh yeah and the second majority that takes up nearly 1/4 of everything but hey once again no clue what it is does came from etc...but hey hey they can claim they know that 4 percent that's matter which even a child understands..so it's infuriating and angry when in their perpetual arrogance they snipe at anyone else who have theories these wizzes who grasp that whopping 4% only feel qualified and that it's ok to chastise these conspiracy theories which incidentally is precisely the word used when Physics first began spreading new ideas. Irony at its best but hey maybe with another few centuries you might get to explaining a massive five percent. It's literally arrogance epitomy comparably to standing on your backyard and thinking you can in any way understand or see anything a continent away. Think Sarah Palin who could apparently see Russia from her backyard. So ask yourself arrogant scientists do you really want to be thought of being like Sarah Palin? Exactly. Grow from Love scientists and if you truly do want understanding I strongly suggest you study the Hindu texts particularly parts regarding the Yuga cycles and also those on Vimana technology and the nuts bolts diagrams of them. 😊