Workers have been worried about being replaced by machinery since at least the 18th Century when farm workers would go around smashing looms that they were worried would result in them losing their jobs.
@SocialistWelder What are you on about there are so many jobs you can do, I was a car mechanic but the pay was low. So I became a programmer it took some time to learn but I'm happy now. Mental ilness has nothing to do with unemployment. In fact Mental ilness is a product of low understanding of yourselve and how the mind works. Many people don't even know why they are depressed in the first place and don't seek help.
25:39 My father began working as a computer programmer in a lab exactly like this at the San Diego Union-Tribune in the same year, 1968. I remember those machines well. They were loud, and the A/C fans even louder. There were seemingly miles of cables underneath the 3' ceiling tile-type false flooring. I once rolled over them on my roller-skates to hear the hollow.
Technology will replace more mechanical jobs but this also means new jobs will arise because of this. In my opinion this is a good thing but many people don't like the idea of change because adaptment takes effort.
I love how at about 23:06 they are so impressed by the 3D house, that they put this revolutionary, out of this world electronic beat, a trance, that just blows my mind how extremely fascinating they must have seen this new technology.
This was made 52 years ago. Go back 52 years before that - 1916 - a time of WWI, biplanes, horses, early cars, lots of steam power, very early phones. Consider the period 1916-1968 versus 1968-2020 and appreciate just how much civilization has slowed down.
Imagine politicians trying to hold back the computer revolution back then. However now a days... people dont believe in renewables and want to keep coal going.
The difference is that then robots still had to be built, and art and such could not be automated. Nowdays nearly everything can be automated with AI, and pretty soon everything WILL be automated.
The government has long ago learned that it's far easier to export raw materials and have very high immigration to get property taxes from a perpetual housing bubble.
Computers did take people's jobs.Telephone operators lost their jobs in the 1960s. Typists lost their jobs in the 1970s, in the 1980s data entry operators and computer operators lost their jobs, in the 1990s, many forms based processes became computerised and the clerks who used to process the forms lost their jobs so did many factory workers and assembly line workers. In the 2000s clerks and some accounts lost their jobs. Now it is large truck drivers in the mining industries and train drivers losing their jobs and some managers and some computer programmers.
Well said. You forgot photocopiers/ printers, replacing the company "printroom". Remember "100 sets? Come back and collect it Tuesday?" The printroom staff all left, to be replaced by "that damned thing in the corner". Now we have the long awaited "paperless office" pressuring the copier/ printer industry. Nothing stays still.
You are right. And the banker who was confident that "service industry" employment would not be affected by computerisation got it wrong, ATMs have made banker tellers lose their jobs in large numbers and has seen numerous bank branches be replaced by a set of ATMs in shopping centre walk ways. Ticket machines saw bus and train conductors lose their jobs and train station masters, baggage handlers at train stations, and ticket sellers all lost their jobs too, replaced by machines or just nothing in the case of the baggage handlers. Of course new jobs have been created, and new services are wanted so people get new jobs but it is usually new people in the new jobs and many of the old job holders end up as the long term unemployed or are forced into early retirement.
@@CreeperDaGuy would you like to have jobs of the old still ? unless jobs are literally destroyed, there's no possibility of new jobs evolving. if you had billions of farmers, no factory workers would exist. there would be no software ware jobs if all engineers were still in factories
Nowadays AI makes consultants, copywriters, staticians, analysts almost obsolete. Almost, because there will be always the components of verifying and prompting needed
How bout this one: Right angled triangles Right angled triangles, Right angled triangles, it's always true That the sum of the square of the two sides of the triangle, equal the square of the hypotenuse... Sung to "waltzing matilda" 🤣👌
In third world countries 1968 sounds like an ancient period but in. Europe. Or 1st and 2nd world countries ie Usa ussr. Etc. we’re advanced back then and were technologically advanced
I distinctly remember back in 1983 in my school we had one computer - an Apple IIe - that only two people knew how to use. My teacher who was the head of mathematics and myself who had expressed an interest in learning how to use it. Our school woefully under-prepared its students for any form of computer knowledge in the workplace. When I joined the workforce in 1984 there was zero computer knowledge amongst most people I worked with and to this day I still encounter people at my work who are technology illiterates except for knowing how to use social media on their smartphones. Australia should be at the forefront of technology, manufacturing, and STEM learning yet we have devolved to be a services country that digs minerals out of the ground to keep our economy running. It is very sad.
Love how the professor thought under 12s didn’t have enough logical thought to use a computer. Now 3 year olds hold iPads with more computing power he has ever seen in their hands without problem and see it as an extension of their own mind and body in many ways.
@@feraudyh I would have to say at the time programming was required to work with computer.. i.e. punch cards, etc... But we now have kids working with micro controllers and making there own game.
@@cheesestickfpv6162 Their own game? That must be a very small minority. In any case, the idea that kids could not be logical before 12 or 14 was quite common at the time. It was partly due to Piaget's ideas on developmental psychology. Conversely, the idea that you could not learn anything new past 35 has had a long life.
Technology was a bit different back then. Now it's easy to use and understand, and especially easy to mess around with and tinker. That is why kids get such an excellent understanding of technology. Prior to this, you needed to know exactly what to do to use the machine.
Man, it’s amazing to think how similar somethings are, and yet how different they are. The more things change, the more they stay the same… And “computers will take my job” is the modern version of monks saying “say, that new printing press might put us outta work…” And it’s funny. The guy at the end worrying about the government collecting all our data? I wonder what he thinks now about Facebook, etc?
,_, Im disappointed. Edit: WHYYY does humanity keep doing this to me? (Why is humanity destroying every thought I have about it being able to think?) We were literally made for survival and social adaption. AI is about training towards doing something the right way to achieve a certain goal. Of course it can adapt to humans in a way that its actions are not just a little shifted for the social part. But there are physical laws and although the optimum in solving problems may be very impressive it isnt magic. You can only do so much in a certain time period from your current state. Its not about either wanting or not wanting to help humans, its about the optimum solution to problems (I think ai right now most of the times just rolls down the hill and tries to get to the deepest point of a valley with it being hard to know whether the hill next to it has a deeper valley on the other side), which often is a balance between many things and as long as they wont achieve their goals as well, because we dont let them to, because they dont do what we want, they will have to adapt to that. The question is whether they as singular systems will be able to find smart solutions to problems without having had to try something similar to check whether it works and use that to do something that allows them to effieciently succeed in what they have to do without us being able to stop them at the right moment.. but: 1. Backups and switches, they wont be able to use magic to prevent you from using it. (Very strong auto activation when they get too close to certain objects?) 2. Finding a way to get a clear overview of what they will do. (Maybe something that changes them based on how we feel or think, but the information stays seperate from the ai, something interpretes the data from us and the ai and affects the ai with it. The ai needs to be incapable of changing based on the observed change in itself (maybe, but maybe not). If its capable of that then maybe its own processing of that needs to be seperated from the events that happen by making it observe it with a changing amount of time between it. (Random would be nice, but. Processing and magic ai) This has disadvantages (Im saying dodo-water the whole time and will continue to do this) 3. Literally make its model to process worse for specific things (like, naaaah, who wants that and it doesnt even work with magic ai, so??) 4. 2 again, because understanding what the values in their network mean is super useful. If you're wondering "Why would we make ai in the first place if we can understand the optimum solution?", well, because to me it seems like checking the optimum solution for the values it has usually costs less work than finding out what it is. (Jep.. (help, Im disappointed in both humanity and myself)). So, this is my brilliant plan, because duhhh, it works this way. Oh, and the four laws of robotics really make sense 👍 Yes yes yes.. mm. They do. Exponential growth in smartiness seems cool. But please, no talking about magic ai (I accept prepared ai, or not, you can do both but I'd be disappointed), maybe talk about clearly physically capable of solving problems in annoying ways ai, but real rules. Movies in which someone does something in a very precise way to start a chain of events that ends with the desired outcome only works for a lot of spread possibilities/chaotically spread possibilities (magic (or lucky) ai required)/luck for location? (Maybe there are so many initial location possibilities (also chaotic) with there being a small chance that the location to do it has the right possibilities for it to be able to go right there (luck of location) that there are still quite some locations that have the possibilities that are needed so magic ai can find them???) You better read this confusing mess (=. = ) Second Edit: Im talking about magic ai, but what I mean when I say it is half the (seemingly ._.) impossible kind that is able to glitch the universe and half the kind that is able to just find the beeeest solution to a problem fast without having to try the other ones.
I had the privilege of working with a lifetime IBM'er when the company I worked for merged with another IT services company that specialized in AS/400 systems. A closet full of white oxford shirts, the whole bit. I volunteered for any and every trip to any and every one horse town on the west coast, because windshield time with that guy was a masterclass on how to be a professional.
... after already were being replaced by technology. But hey, human beings could vote, not machines, and in democracy one tycoon vote is less counted than millions of workers. So system leeches simply have to adjust their rhetoric to popular opinion in order to persuade that millions that "hordes of foreign workers are guilty" for their surplus on capitalist market. Suckers.
There is no democracy,there's only a political & financial system that rules.. All your so called elected members are only there for the smooth handling of funds....& the capitalist market, that's called the black market...... when you introduce a foreigner from a lower background to the market, he/she ain't going to be the first HAND AT THE ENTERPRISE BARGAINING TABLE TRUST ME........ products & services will increase, & the wages remain well well behind..... unless you're within a specific skill set.
Lana, let me ask you this, if you were asked to spot the difference between a person from lets say China, & a person from India,Pakistan or Sri Lanka? I hope you get my drift that'll make your reply a touch ridiculous considering the principle point I've touched on yeah? Btw, Turkey is a country where the east is Asia & the west Europe; would you consider the people of eastern Turkey Asians & not Turks?........ i added that last point about Turkey just in case you missed my dichotomy...... you are dismissed..... NEXT
@@susanwalters8567 Asians are just people from the Asian continent its not a spot the difference game. Turkey isnt comprabale to India at all if thats what you were doing
It's been worrying us since the begining of the industrial revolution. A matter of fact I am sure there were folk 10,000 years ago thinking "These domesticated Oxen are going to put us out of work"
Lets be honest, have you seen the state of the logistics sector recently? They have gone from employing everybody who could walk to a few people with years of training. Back in the day you could carry firewood with the age of 4. Then big government came in and makes ridiculous requirements. Like being middle aged (16 or older) and currently not actively starving to dead. Where will it end?
In my country they charge you more if you go into the bank, they want you to do everything online or at the ATM. One of our bank accounts are with a fully automated bank, there are no branches.
The good old days, when most programmers where women, computers threatened to take your job and there was a constant threat of total thermonuclear war.
Which is how Tatts lotto made sure the had the right amount of people winning the first prices. :) Also to think that if only you listened in school you would be working in a IT capacity and earning a lot of money ?
I was 10 in 1968. I was never given that method of mathematics nor was I or anyone around me, prepared for the computer. I was 37, (1995) the first time I ever had a go at a computer and picked it up pretty quickly but by then it was just a matter of using a keyboard and learning how to use programs, as it is now.
Your mobile phone has more than 1000x the computing power of every computer in this film combined....
I think rather 1.000.000x time more power .
@@rgg.x1 your phone have 15 years ?
“Computing power” lol
Hey ABC, love these clips from the archives... please keep posting more! Its very enlightening!
Back then they thought us how to prepare for the future, now they teach us how to prepare for the 90s
Can you elaborate?
@@samueldacricketer it's probably how the school system is incredibly outdated and essentially hasn't changed since it's invention
Pretty sure Jo Beilke Peterson took this literally in Queensland.
@@samueldacricketer 2090's
I'm so old I worked with many of those original computers:) Happy times.
Workers have been worried about being replaced by machinery since at least the 18th Century when farm workers would go around smashing looms that they were worried would result in them losing their jobs.
Getting purpose from a job would be an equally sad prospect... :)
Whats your flag?
@@EveryoneWhoUsesThisTV It blows my mind how many peoples only purpose in life is work.
Haha yeah. Jobs do get replaced but new jobs open up. People need to relax.
@SocialistWelder What are you on about there are so many jobs you can do, I was a car mechanic but the pay was low. So I became a programmer it took some time to learn but I'm happy now. Mental ilness has nothing to do with unemployment. In fact Mental ilness is a product of low understanding of yourselve and how the mind works. Many people don't even know why they are depressed in the first place and don't seek help.
25:39 My father began working as a computer programmer in a lab exactly like this at the San Diego Union-Tribune in the same year, 1968. I remember those machines well. They were loud, and the A/C fans even louder. There were seemingly miles of cables underneath the 3' ceiling tile-type false flooring. I once rolled over them on my roller-skates to hear the hollow.
Was he over 35?
Technology will replace more mechanical jobs but this also means new jobs will arise because of this. In my opinion this is a good thing but many people don't like the idea of change because adaptment takes effort.
I find this absolutely fascinating in 2020
What do you mean? You make me confused.. we are in 1983.. which planet you came from sir?
Exactly! Lol.
I found 2020 fascinating
@@SeamusMcMichael I didn't
I love how at about 23:06 they are so impressed by the 3D house, that they put this revolutionary, out of this world electronic beat, a trance, that just blows my mind how extremely fascinating they must have seen this new technology.
for anyone wondering, adjusted for inflation those salesmen would be making $156k AUS or $121k USD
Back then everyone was well spoken
Definitely not
And back then, people said the same thing you said. It's an on going cycle. Any language changes over time.
'love the music at the start
It gives me anxiety
what is the music?
@@swank215 me too
The 3D house was quite impressive for 1968!
The computer room and all the computer gear inside it looked quite modern for 1968
The scientists in the end were SO precise in predicting everything about the recent history!
This was made 52 years ago. Go back 52 years before that - 1916 - a time of WWI, biplanes, horses, early cars, lots of steam power, very early phones. Consider the period 1916-1968 versus 1968-2020 and appreciate just how much civilization has slowed down.
Nah, we invest on Digital tech tree rather than Space tech tree
So many scientific and medical discoveries from then and now that I’d beg the differ
We’ll never becoming advance enough, because we’ll doom ourselves before.
Gareth Lewis you right you right
Yeah man
Well, thanks to computers I have a job.
Thanks to Jobs I have a computer :)
2 and 3 are the same as five, what a great teaching strategy
Little does he know that planes pretty much fly themselves 20yrs after this...
There are now 600 computers in Australia haha
We have about 2000 in our building alone
Hahaha 🤣🤣🤣
Imagine politicians trying to hold back the computer revolution back then. However now a days... people dont believe in renewables and want to keep coal going.
Where are all the computers that want to do my job and why do I still have to work?
Ask again in 5-10 years.
The difference is that then robots still had to be built, and art and such could not be automated.
Nowdays nearly everything can be automated with AI, and pretty soon everything WILL be automated.
Funny how far ahead in technology Australia was back then compared to now...
The government has long ago learned that it's far easier to export raw materials and have very high immigration to get property taxes from a perpetual housing bubble.
Computers did take people's jobs.Telephone operators lost their jobs in the 1960s. Typists lost their jobs in the 1970s, in the 1980s data entry operators and computer operators lost their jobs, in the 1990s, many forms based processes became computerised and the clerks who used to process the forms lost their jobs so did many factory workers and assembly line workers. In the 2000s clerks and some accounts lost their jobs. Now it is large truck drivers in the mining industries and train drivers losing their jobs and some managers and some computer programmers.
Well said.
You forgot photocopiers/ printers, replacing the company "printroom". Remember "100 sets? Come back and collect it Tuesday?"
The printroom staff all left, to be replaced by "that damned thing in the corner".
Now we have the long awaited "paperless office" pressuring the copier/ printer industry. Nothing stays still.
You are right. And the banker who was confident that "service industry" employment would not be affected by computerisation got it wrong, ATMs have made banker tellers lose their jobs in large numbers and has seen numerous bank branches be replaced by a set of ATMs in shopping centre walk ways. Ticket machines saw bus and train conductors lose their jobs and train station masters, baggage handlers at train stations, and ticket sellers all lost their jobs too, replaced by machines or just nothing in the case of the baggage handlers. Of course new jobs have been created, and new services are wanted so people get new jobs but it is usually new people in the new jobs and many of the old job holders end up as the long term unemployed or are forced into early retirement.
So it saying we should destroy all computers and go back before them?
@@jamespriest7328 I'm observing that the reassurance of job safety was false.
@@philipwest4553 gotcha. Just that u were on of those non GMOs, back to the 19th century freaks. My apologies.
*ominous voice* "When this circuit learns your job.... what *ARE* you going to do???"
*cue benny hill music*
omg, it really WAS crazy carnival music!! That was surreal.
The guy at the end said it all!
1968 wasn't that long ago lol, and even still loads of jobs have been replaced.
thank god they have been
@@hayekianman why?
52 years is a lot
@@CreeperDaGuy would you like to have jobs of the old still ? unless jobs are literally destroyed, there's no possibility of new jobs evolving. if you had billions of farmers, no factory workers would exist. there would be no software ware jobs if all engineers were still in factories
@@hayekianman the "climate change" they whinge about wouldn't have been a prob though if billions of subsistent farmers still existed 🤣🤷♀️
Back in that time period technology was an actual real threat. And it is still today for other jobs.
Nowadays AI makes consultants, copywriters, staticians, analysts almost obsolete. Almost, because there will be always the components of verifying and prompting needed
Back in the days when a computer virus was on a punch card. 😖
they not even exist yet .
Jeez … imagine being forced to memorise “two and three are the same as five, one and four are the same as five” ! See 00:48
How bout this one:
Right angled triangles
Right angled triangles,
Right angled triangles, it's always true
That the sum of the square of the two sides of the triangle, equal the square of the hypotenuse...
Sung to "waltzing matilda" 🤣👌
Australia used to do so many things and now thanks to globalisation ... do we do anything?
You better start being thankful to your chinese overlords
We aren't allowed since we signed the UN Lima Agreement in 1974.
We dig very nice holes.
@@electricdreams9446 yes ain't that the Truth sold out by politicians.
The professor nailed it though towards the end. What a great doc and so relevant even today
The man at 38:20 was so before his time
In third world countries 1968 sounds like an ancient period but in. Europe. Or 1st and 2nd world countries ie Usa ussr. Etc. we’re advanced back then and were technologically advanced
I wonder if computers will ever catch on.
they will, it's only inevitable. but whether humans will allow it to is the real question
Yeah right! 🙄
I love watching these programmes.
a programme about programs
people have been turned to zombies nowdays they can not take eyes off sereens or mobilephones
Like you!
Ok boomer (I'm sorry I just had to)
I distinctly remember back in 1983 in my school we had one computer - an Apple IIe - that only two people knew how to use. My teacher who was the head of mathematics and myself who had expressed an interest in learning how to use it. Our school woefully under-prepared its students for any form of computer knowledge in the workplace.
When I joined the workforce in 1984 there was zero computer knowledge amongst most people I worked with and to this day I still encounter people at my work who are technology illiterates except for knowing how to use social media on their smartphones. Australia should be at the forefront of technology, manufacturing, and STEM learning yet we have devolved to be a services country that digs minerals out of the ground to keep our economy running. It is very sad.
7:15 Very accurate!
IBM is a different company now
“Work only 3 hours a week”? Yes, please! My personal to-do list is never-ending!
Some great words in this, very well done, even more disturbing in retrospect.
Crazy to think 45 years later and a child of 4 could teach computer skills.
"4 and 1 are the same as 5"
Sounds like a cult doing a ritual
“Another race, the space race”. Legendary segue
Computers have come a long way. But our leaders have becoming dumber...
These so called "computers" are just a fad, we won't even remember them a few years from now.
I totally agree
31 minutes anyone else get crash bandicoot soundtrack vibes?
Convinced it is.. Good spot
But can the original computer play Crysis?
Stop using self serve, your not even being paid too work there 😂
I never use it...
Won’t watch through 3 ads to even start the video.
Back in my day computers were small children held for six hours a day in buildings called classrooms and forced to do calculations
2:31 - "The document is being copied. Wait." - but I want it NOOOOOWWW...
And I want it all.....
Sorry....no relational databases until 1990.
Q. would you trust the average politician? A. I am afraid i wouldn't.
Love how the professor thought under 12s didn’t have enough logical thought to use a computer. Now 3 year olds hold iPads with more computing power he has ever seen in their hands without problem and see it as an extension of their own mind and body in many ways.
To be fair, he was talking about learning computer programming, not simply using a computer.
My grandmother drew maps by hand.
"Certainly not before 12 or 14, they do not have enough logical thought" .... We now have kids younger doing amazing things with technology...
The ones who do any programming are pretty rare. At the time it was assumed that "doing things with computers" was programming
@@feraudyh I would have to say at the time programming was required to work with computer.. i.e. punch cards, etc... But we now have kids working with micro controllers and making there own game.
@@cheesestickfpv6162 Their own game? That must be a very small minority. In any case, the idea that kids could not be logical before 12 or 14 was quite common at the time. It was partly due to Piaget's ideas on developmental psychology. Conversely, the idea that you could not learn anything new past 35 has had a long life.
That makes sense. Kids now are introduced to computers at a very young age, giving them a greater advantage.
Technology was a bit different back then. Now it's easy to use and understand, and especially easy to mess around with and tinker. That is why kids get such an excellent understanding of technology. Prior to this, you needed to know exactly what to do to use the machine.
Back in my day, computers were called books.
They had a electric pen during these times wow
I wonder how our life could change from now to 1990?
T C
You are angry.. you can’t talk like this.
A computer without human input somewhere recommend that I watch this video! Should I be worried????
yeah that says all, all that we need to know.
Unfortunately it controls us humans in ways we do not even realise
Couldn't they see back then, that computers needed human operators, and human repair techs?
kurt Vonnegut wrote player piano in 1952 about machines replacing humans as workers...
Man, it’s amazing to think how similar somethings are, and yet how different they are. The more things change, the more they stay the same… And “computers will take my job” is the modern version of monks saying “say, that new printing press might put us outta work…”
And it’s funny. The guy at the end worrying about the government collecting all our data? I wonder what he thinks now about Facebook, etc?
no shit and a lot of them were
AI is a good idea, until it finds human redundant. Robots have been made that do not adhere to the four laws of robotics.
,_, Im disappointed.
Edit: WHYYY does humanity keep doing this to me?
(Why is humanity destroying every thought I have about it being able to think?)
We were literally made for survival and social adaption.
AI is about training towards doing something the right way to achieve a certain goal.
Of course it can adapt to humans in a way that its actions are not just a little shifted for the social part.
But there are physical laws and although the optimum in solving problems may be very impressive it isnt magic.
You can only do so much in a certain time period from your current state.
Its not about either wanting or not wanting to help humans, its about the optimum solution to problems (I think ai right now most of the times just rolls down the hill and tries to get to the deepest point of a valley with it being hard to know whether the hill next to it has a deeper valley on the other side), which often is a balance between many things and as long as they wont achieve their goals as well, because we dont let them to, because they dont do what we want, they will have to adapt to that.
The question is whether they as singular systems will be able to find smart solutions to problems without having had to try something similar to check whether it works and use that to do something that allows them to effieciently succeed in what they have to do without us being able to stop them at the right moment.. but:
1. Backups and switches, they wont be able to use magic to prevent you from using it. (Very strong auto activation when they get too close to certain objects?)
2. Finding a way to get a clear overview of what they will do. (Maybe something that changes them based on how we feel or think, but the information stays seperate from the ai, something interpretes the data from us and the ai and affects the ai with it.
The ai needs to be incapable of changing based on the observed change in itself (maybe, but maybe not).
If its capable of that then maybe its own processing of that needs to be seperated from the events that happen by making it observe it with a changing amount of time between it. (Random would be nice, but. Processing and magic ai) This has disadvantages (Im saying dodo-water the whole time and will continue to do this)
3. Literally make its model to process worse for specific things (like, naaaah, who wants that and it doesnt even work with magic ai, so??)
4. 2 again, because understanding what the values in their network mean is super useful. If you're wondering "Why would we make ai in the first place if we can understand the optimum solution?", well, because to me it seems like checking the optimum solution for the values it has usually costs less work than finding out what it is. (Jep.. (help, Im disappointed in both humanity and myself)).
So, this is my brilliant plan, because duhhh, it works this way.
Oh, and the four laws of robotics really make sense 👍
Yes yes yes.. mm. They do.
Exponential growth in smartiness seems cool.
But please, no talking about magic ai (I accept prepared ai, or not, you can do both but I'd be disappointed), maybe talk about clearly physically capable of solving problems in annoying ways ai, but real rules.
Movies in which someone does something in a very precise way to start a chain of events that ends with the desired outcome only works for a lot of spread possibilities/chaotically spread possibilities (magic (or lucky) ai required)/luck for location? (Maybe there are so many initial location possibilities (also chaotic) with there being a small chance that the location to do it has the right possibilities for it to be able to go right there (luck of location) that there are still quite some locations that have the possibilities that are needed so magic ai can find them???)
You better read this confusing mess
(=. = )
Second Edit: Im talking about magic ai, but what I mean when I say it is half the (seemingly ._.) impossible kind that is able to glitch the universe and half the kind that is able to just find the beeeest solution to a problem fast without having to try the other ones.
@@firstnamethenameafterthefi5687 a- are u a computer?
3:16 i thought they were gonna say the old man plays fortnite lol
Why are all of these style "warning" videos being lately recommended to so many people ?
May be far fetched but is this a warning to us ?
Karol Panus maybe the TH-cam algorithm gained a conscious 😂
It's not late, people already see this in their tv 😂
Perhaps
This is the year the very first Holden Monaro was released,but you all knew that already.
That intro-track was pretty fire!!
I had the privilege of working with a lifetime IBM'er when the company I worked for merged with another IT services company that specialized in AS/400 systems. A closet full of white oxford shirts, the whole bit. I volunteered for any and every trip to any and every one horse town on the west coast, because windshield time with that guy was a masterclass on how to be a professional.
and?
@@ayaygabriel
Och du är efterbliven. Glömde den sista delen där, förlåt för det.
Nowadays lots of people over 35 start learning programming....
1968 : workers worried about being replaced by technology
2019 : workers worried about being replaced by Asian or Indians.
... after already were being replaced by technology.
But hey, human beings could vote, not machines, and in democracy one tycoon vote is less counted than millions of workers. So system leeches simply have to adjust their rhetoric to popular opinion in order to persuade that millions that "hordes of foreign workers are guilty" for their surplus on capitalist market.
Suckers.
There is no democracy,there's only a political & financial system that rules.. All your so called elected members are only there for the smooth handling of funds....& the capitalist market, that's called the black market...... when you introduce a foreigner from a lower background to the market, he/she ain't going to be the first HAND AT THE ENTERPRISE BARGAINING TABLE TRUST ME........ products & services will increase, & the wages remain well well behind..... unless you're within a specific skill set.
Susan Walters Indians are A S I A N 😑
Lana, let me ask you this, if you were asked to spot the difference between a person from lets say China, & a person from India,Pakistan or Sri Lanka? I hope you get my drift that'll make your reply a touch ridiculous considering the principle point I've touched on yeah? Btw, Turkey is a country where the east is Asia & the west Europe; would you consider the people of eastern Turkey Asians & not Turks?........ i added that last point about Turkey just in case you missed my dichotomy...... you are dismissed..... NEXT
@@susanwalters8567 Asians are just people from the Asian continent its not a spot the difference game. Turkey isnt comprabale to India at all if thats what you were doing
bah. Computers. thatll never catch on.
THOSE HAIRCUTS are amazing xd
crazy to think that at 1968, $12,000 or more P/A is their baseline for a high sales rate.
don't forget inflation
$91,336.90 in today's money. That seems like plenty, no?
If theoretically someone would show them smartphone..they’d be shocked.
Australia was a developing country?
And they were!
It's been worrying us since the begining of the industrial revolution.
A matter of fact I am sure there were folk 10,000 years ago thinking "These domesticated Oxen are going to put us out of work"
Lets be honest, have you seen the state of the logistics sector recently?
They have gone from employing everybody who could walk to a few people with years of training. Back in the day you could carry firewood with the age of 4. Then big government came in and makes ridiculous requirements. Like being middle aged (16 or older) and currently not actively starving to dead. Where will it end?
We are in 2021 we are so advanced that we still can’t find the plane that gone missing. We don’t know where it gone to actually!!
Illuminati sacrifice
As long as robotic anything to do with warfare, doesn't get abused and out of control we should be good.
$12,000 or more a year. Damn. Thats less than centrelink now
yeah but houses were cheaper.
Inflation
@@milkybar06 Yep, my first house, brand new in 1972 was $17,000, but I had to have two mortgages and a personal loan to buy it!!
1968 wasn't so long ago ...
it was 52 years ago...
52 years ago
It is in some contexts
sure,if you consider when the first human was born,so depends on your point of view
It's practically eternity in the tech world.
About 1 minute in and I'm thinking are these kids part of a cult.
In my country they charge you more if you go into the bank, they want you to do everything online or at the ATM. One of our bank accounts are with a fully automated bank, there are no branches.
The computer scientist is a daddy. Ladies, you know which one it is 😏
The clothing and hairstyles of the Aussies look very similar to 1968 American folk.
🤣 are you American?
Ever heard of the Luddites? A long time before 1968.
And now they have. Next up, burger flipping machines.
The good old days, when most programmers where women, computers threatened to take your job and there was a constant threat of total thermonuclear war.
Hahw what? Irony?
Now it's climate change. The system thrives on hobgoblins.
Which is how Tatts lotto made sure the had the right amount of people winning the first prices. :) Also to think that if only you listened in school you would be working in a IT capacity and earning a lot of money ?
is that the ITs guys Porsche out the front no
The snake that eats it's own tale! Create to destroy! And vice versa! Till there is nothing left! GREAT JOB GUYS!
Dr. Smith what story did it eat
@@eggshells652 lmao
Very true, it's just a matter of time 😎
They were right. Look at the workforce participation rate
Nice
If only they started to tax the machines back in that day.
40: 00 so right
40:00
I was 10 in 1968. I was never given that method of mathematics nor was I or anyone around me, prepared for the computer. I was 37, (1995) the first time I ever had a go at a computer and picked it up pretty quickly but by then it was just a matter of using a keyboard and learning how to use programs, as it is now.
80s called dummu
Dean PD You didn’t use computers at all or just personal computers?
In the late 70s we had MAB rods.
And yet, they STILL haven't taken my job....