In discussing economic systems, debaters tend to overlook the importance of market mechanism. If prices are allowed to move more freely, ie determined by supply and demand, this would enable more efficient allocation of resources.
they did explained quite clearly in the video. If capital were to move absolutely free, the one already with capital will have the say absolutely. in the end it will control the democratic system of the country. Do you think this is the efficient way of resource allocation? Or only serving those who already rich?
@ I didn’t make myself clear. What I was merely referring to the incorporation of price mechanism as the 1978 reform did would decentralize decision process allowing the economy to function more efficiently.
张教授加油。
In discussing economic systems, debaters tend to overlook the importance of market mechanism. If prices are allowed to move more freely, ie determined by supply and demand, this would enable more efficient allocation of resources.
they did explained quite clearly in the video. If capital were to move absolutely free, the one already with capital will have the say absolutely. in the end it will control the democratic system of the country. Do you think this is the efficient way of resource allocation? Or only serving those who already rich?
@ I didn’t make myself clear. What I was merely referring to the incorporation of price mechanism as the 1978 reform did would decentralize decision process allowing the economy to function more efficiently.
美元美股又创新高😂😂
想表达什么呢？
一天天胡说八道。没有钱的人，你能贷到钱吗。
专家这么解释资本主义和社会主义😂，受教了。怎么解释封建社会和共产主义？知道您是专家，但也别张嘴就来😅
张的讲话和文章都对基础智商门槛要求比较高，不太适合你听确实
@@miaowang6250 lmao, zhi na zhu zai zhi na guo lan si
西方制度是过把瘾就死的制度，西方发达国家，出生率没几个超过1.5，更不用说2.1了。30年前，日本很强，现在韩国超过了日本，但韩国出生率不到1，未来会比日本衰退更快。美国要不是美元强大，垮掉将更快。