00:00 Raiders of the Lost Ark Section 11:02 Marshal College 27:00 Castle Sant'Angelo 48:07 Vatican City 03:27 Gizeh Egypt 06:22:38 The Himalayas 07:20:10 Sukothai 09:26:17 Ziggurat
As an archaeologist, I love how the Indiana Jones series has stirred curiosity and love for history, but the constant destruction of historical buildings kills me.
People need to stop trying to compare this game to Tomb Raider and Uncharted. This game wanted to give a distinct feel than the other games. Indy never had the fast paced dynamic movements like Lara and Drake and even his fighting wasn’t all that quick and seamless. They wanted the movement and gameplay to be just like the films.
he cuts out the thinking process and failed attempts to get a better stream lined watchable experience, otherwise this would be double in length and a pain to upload !!!
wow you are really fast, I hope to take a look of your walkthrough in the upcoming days....one question though ...does your vid also includes the DLC The Order of Giants? Thanks
It was 1937, Siam was not at war and the japanese are still battling China, no Japanese are stationed in Thailand before 1940. And the 'General' which I think is "Field Marshal Plaek Phibunsongkram' are a big fan of Facismo which would make sense if he opens the door for the german and italians
In all my guess for that it could be, I would’ve never guessed that the treasure of the Great Circle was that!!!!!!!!🤯💥🤩 I guess all the other treasures got one upped by the one in this game because of how important it was in history The clues seem to lead to it but I only thought it was a coincidence
I gotta say this is by far one of the best tie in game and years and this is made by the same folks I gave you Wolfenstein and doom and if you thought dial of destiny was alright and bombed💣 hard. well this game is amazing
The only thing I don't like about this game is it keeps switching between 1st person and 3rd person. Is there a setting where it just stays on 1st person or 3rd person?
My experience with Indiana Jones and the Great Circle and the results of some experiments:(only in a technical sense, about rtx, performance, overlock, 3090, 4090 etc.) Well, as I said in my previous message, let those who have the means buy the latest ..90 series, since most of us do not have the means, it is most reasonable to buy two generations or the previous generation zero or second hand ..90 series. Look, if the card is powerful and the vram is enough (i.e. ..90 series), there is no problem. You know what the only issue is? I mean, the only reason to buy the latest version ..90 series is RTX-Ray Tracing, which is what you really need. (I don't think that's a good reason to pay that much money either, but we've covered that below). I mean, believe me, even in Full Ray Tracing, it doesn't affect the visual quality that much in most games, it doesn't make that much of a difference, but since it degrades performance and causes serious stuttering, that's where the 4090 is needed. For example, in the Indiana Jones game, which requires 4090 at ultra 4K settings, I only need it if ray tracing is full on, otherwise I can play with 3090 at ultra 4K with very good quality and full smoothness. And you know what I did, of course it's not the same as trying with 4090, but I overlocked the ram and processor and this time I tried again with 3090 at 4K ultra and full ray tracing at the highest settings. Dlss off or on, but quality or automatic, I tried them all one by one. Normally, the game was getting sluggish with the 3090 when I turned on ray tracing before overclocking. So I agreed that it really needed 4090, but after overlocking, it didn't stutter at all, but with ray tracing, the ray tracing visuals were not so “Oh my! This has become a wonderful and indispensable visual feast! I should definitely get a 4090 or 5090!” there was no difference. In fact, the difference is almost non-existent in this game. Obviously, that new update for that rtx came for nothing, what difference did it make. Of course, these may vary according to the game, but this is my observation. There were already those who said that the visual quality was only 20% difference compared to 3090, but according to what and according to whom. Think about it, while it was only possible to play with full ray tracing with the 4090, I achieved the same possibility by safely and automatically overlocking the ram and processor in 5 minutes (with the Asus motherboard bios feature). So you really need to think about how necessary it really is. I mean, if there was a huge difference and all new games came out as a wonderful visual feast, but there is not. Therefore, this is the situation.
Has anyone else suffered an unbearable bug after the 🐍 where he just doesn't attach to the vine when you are trying to climb the pyramid? It's like it's missing an animation where it jumps out to 3rd person and then you climb up. Been at it for like over an hour now and there's no animation for him to attach onto? Am I losing my mind and missing something ? 😂
I am still at the beginning i know he gets his British friends help. I was wondering does he get the guy who played gimli in lord of the rings as his character to help indy
FOR NVIDIA GRAPHICS CARDS THE ANSWER IS CLEAR, IT IS MORE IMPORTANT THAT IT IS THE TOP VERSION (..90), NOT THE NEW SERIES (4000, 5000)! Note: This important observation is especially true for those with top-of-the-line PC hardware. There is no in-between in this regard. I can't tell you how glad I am that I didn't make the grave mistake of leaving the 3090 and buying the 4080. I've been playing with Dlss turned off a lot lately anyway, the picture quality is much better. Anyone who reads and understands the article below understands very well that there is nothing in between. There is no need for that new generation in terms of performance for someone with a 3090 and good pc hardware. Look, I did not experience the slightest stuttering in stalker 2. The difference in image quality is very little difference between 3090-4090. A friend said 20 percent, but he is also unknown. Will these new low-quality games give us that 20% difference in image quality, let me laugh so that it is not wasted. The important thing for the 3090 owner is that the other components are top notch. And the screen too. To make it more concrete in the mind: These guys are saying that you won't have performance problems with Dlss and your cards will last longer, right? But that's only partially true for those with relatively low PC hardware. And they confuse you with fancy presentations as if it improves the image quality. For example, for a long time, until I understood the business (and I'm so curious that I read and research, despite that), I envisioned Dlss as something that improves image quality. Then I realized that only ray tracing and a more powerful card improve the image quality. Never Dlss and Frame Generation. 1- Well, those with good PC hardware and powerful graphics cards don't need Dlss and Frame Generation anyway! 2- Those with low PC hardware or those with ..50, ..60, ..70 or even ..80 series, except for the ..90 series, will not be able to take full advantage of those image quality enhancing features because they will open Dlss in performance mode (dlss performance mode runs the game at 720p, like a joke) and will have to lower the game settings and turn off ray tracing! What do we understand now! 3- Let's talk about cards lasting longer. This is also a complete lie and something that will not happen for a significant part of the time, because you will not be able to use those new series cards comfortably for that long due to the lack of Vram. There is only one exception, because of the high Vram and power, and that is the ..90 series. So the smartest investment for someone with a 3090 video card is to invest in PC hardware. For example, if the PC Ram is 16 GB, you should buy 32 or 64 GB Dual ram. Buy a PCIe 4.0 M2 SSD. Like upgrading the processor. These can be done easily with the money to be given to the card. The most obvious example of this happened in Stalker 2. Those with relatively low hardware and those without 32 ram could not play fluently. And this is the reason. PC ram scarcity. So the friend went and bought a 4060 or 4070 because it was the new series, the latest and most advanced technology. But this is the problem. They deceive us so badly and they are so cunning that it is natural to be confused and deceived. I couldn't see the issue clearly for a long time. Then these points became clearer and clearer in my mind over time by thinking, researching, reading and comparing people's experiences and complaints. The answer we wrote to a friend who has 4080 in his system and stated that he would save money for 5080: “I wrote and write these things because I am not willing that anyone should pay a lot of money and not get what they pay for. Many people have accepted and confirmed this opinion and determination. Even those who had negative experiences in this direction shared them in detail. (Someone shared his regret in selling 3090 and buying 4080.) The essence of the issue is that we have determined that it is not appropriate to pay a ton of money to buy these cards, as the vram is insufficient in the current table (only 16 GB for 4080 and 5080), except for the latest top versions (..90). ...80 version cards are powerful, but they will not be able to use their power with 12, 16 GB vram, you will have to lower the settings in the face of games that consume 18-19 vram (Star Wars Outlaws for example). Unused power has no value. Dlss increases fps, lowers image resolution. But there is no solution to the lack of vram in 4000 series Dlss. Pay attention to this. Ray tracing also improves the image but decreases the fps. Therefore, with neither 4080 nor 5080 with 12 GB vram, you will not be able to play smoothly with maximum image quality at 4K ultra settings in many next generation games. Yes, we accept that the new generation (4000, 5000) series cards are more powerful and can provide slightly better image quality, but using that power is only possible when the vram is high. Since this is not possible with vram, you will open Dlss, resolution will drop, you will open ray tracing, fps will drop. So I mean, you will only be able to reach an image quality that the 3090 already provides more than enough (provided that you do not compromise on the fluent playing experience). So why would you pay for this stuff! In this case, since the 3090 is 24 GB, it is inappropriate to drop it and pay a lot of money and buy 4080 or 5080 16 GB. In the current situation, I can easily say that if you can afford the 5090, buy it. If not, buy 4090. If you can't buy it either, buy 3090. But definitely do not buy 4080-5080 or lower versions. Of course, this applies to those who want 4K, smooth and high image quality gaming experience and those who already have a high-end PC hardware. But it also applies to those who settle for lesser image quality and lower settings. If you're playing 2K, why do you need a 4080, 5080? A more affordable card for that resolution will do the job. Since the need for vram will drop significantly there, there is no need to pay for power and technology that will not be used with the same logic.” Does DLSS Increase FPS? Yes, DLSS can increase FPS (frames per second). By using AI-assisted sampling, the graphics card is enabled to render at a lower resolution and render the image at a higher resolution. This results in a smoother gaming experience with higher FPS. Does DLSS Degrade the Image? DLSS is designed to improve image quality in general. However, in some cases, especially at low DLSS settings, blurs or other graphical anomalies may occur in the image. High DLSS modes minimize these problems. Does DLSS Reduce VRAM? DLSS does not directly reduce VRAM usage, but it can help the graphics card use VRAM more efficiently. Because it starts by rendering at a lower resolution, the stress on VRAM is reduced, which can indirectly optimize VRAM usage.
I am quite sane, read the following: “Friends who are curious about the 5000 series and hope that the new series will use less vram because of the vram type and Dlss 4, even though the amount of vram in the new series is still low in GB (12 and 16 gb, 5070 and 5080). Pay attention to this test. The claim that the 5070 is twice the performance of the 3090 and the same as the 4090 is in my opinion a big deception and a lie, because unusable power means nothing. How can the 5070 with its 12gb of vram beat these cards with 24gb of vram! The point to note is that the 5080 and below are completely insufficient for 4K highest settings due to the low vram in the lower series except for the 90 series in the 5000 series cards. But very misleadingly, 5070, 3090 and 4090 are used as more performance. Let's see you try to use that performance in a game using 4k ultra and 18 gb vram, then the trick will be revealed. Please see below the comparison of the 5000 series with the previous series, which nvidia supposedly praised with the phrases “higher performance and lower vram usage”. The test used Cyberpunk, which in the old case used 9 GB vram and could be run at 124 fps. With the 5000 series card and Dlss 4 and the new type of vram, the final situation is as follows: 8.6 vram and 137 fps. That's a one-tenth increase in fps and not even a one-tenth decrease in vram usage. 9 gb is good, let's simply multiply them by two: So in a game like Indiana Jones which uses 18 gb, the 5000 series is 8.6*2=17.2 GB Yes, friends, if you are going to use 4K and you are going to do it at the highest settings, it is already clear that the 5000 series (including 5080), except for the 5090, will be insufficient for 4K and for such games. So there are two possibilities, either you will buy 5090 or you will buy and use the ..90 series of one of the old series. 3090 and 4090 24 GB.”
Friends who are curious about the 5000 series and hope that the new series will use less vram because of the vram type and Dlss 4, even though the amount of vram in the new series is still low in GB (12 and 16 gb, 5070 and 5080). Pay attention to this test. The claim that the 5070 is twice the performance of the 3090 and the same as the 4090 is in my opinion a big deception and a lie, because unusable power means nothing. How can the 5070 with its 12gb of vram beat these cards with 24gb of vram! The point to note is that the 5080 and below are completely insufficient for 4K highest settings due to the low vram in the lower series except for the 90 series in the 5000 series cards. But very misleadingly, 5070, 3090 and 4090 are used as more performance. Let's see you try to use that performance in a game using 4k ultra and 18 gb vram, then the trick will be revealed. Please see below the comparison of the 5000 series with the previous series, which nvidia supposedly praised with the phrases “higher performance and lower vram usage”. The test used Cyberpunk, which in the old case used 9 GB vram and could be run at 124 fps. With the 5000 series card and Dlss 4 and the new type of vram, the final situation is as follows: 8.6 vram and 137 fps. That's a one-tenth increase in fps and not even a one-tenth decrease in vram usage. 9 gb is good, let's simply multiply them by two: So in a game like Indiana Jones which uses 18 gb, the 5000 series is 8.6*2=17.2 GB Yes, friends, if you are going to use 4K and you are going to do it at the highest settings, it is already clear that the 5000 series (including 5080), except for the 5090, will be insufficient for 4K and for such games. So there are two possibilities, either you will buy 5090 or you will buy and use the ..90 series of one of the old series. 3090 and 4090 24 GB.
FYI STRAMBO is Italian for WEIRD. Gina is calling you weird or a weirdo hahahahahaha all the way through the game hahahahaha To The Beautiful and charismatic Tony Todd, aka Locus aka The CandyMan sadly passed away early November at the young age of 70 my friend Rest in Peace
Soo happy hearing Thai language in a AAA video game, but it weirds the accent and way they speak is soo formal, like too formal, not something a countryside folks here would speak. In the game, they speak in a formal noble kind of way.
*SPOILER WARNING!* If there is one thing that I would criticize this game for: I don’t like how we’re chasing another judeo-christian artifact. Its not offensive or anything, we’ve just trod this ground twice before and I think it’d be neat to see other things. Like, idk, the Armor of Achilles or something. Give an excuse to have Zeus smite somebody.
Friends, let's sit down and talk straight now, okay, Indiana game is beautiful in many ways, but it has many shortcomings and weaknesses, but I can say this clearly, it is definitely not the AAA game of 2024, and it does not offer a visual feast that deserves 4090 at 4K ultra settings, so I'm not saying it's bad, I'm saying it's not as good and top-notch in every aspect as it is exaggerated in the promotions. The real AAA games that came out years ago look much, much better and smoother than these new releases and Indiana in every aspect. The gameplay is clunky, the pace isn't high enough, the graphics aren't that top-notch, and the artificial intelligence is nowhere to be seen. Now it's impossible to understand why some people give it 9-10. I think 9-10 is very inaccurate and too high. When we take into account the good, bad and average things, it can only be 7. The gameplay is very clunky. The story and sense of adventure is not very paced. So a 7 is appropriate. I mean, it's so strange that the game is given a 9-10. And you're going to give 13-15 to much better games than this! This is ridiculous. Stalker 2 getting a 7 is another absurdity. It deserves a score like 4-5. Please try to understand my logic, it's wrong to give 9-10 points out of the blue just because something is nice and you like it, because something is done well. There are many flaws and weaknesses in this game, yes there are some very good things, but they cannot be a justification for giving 9-10 points. Maybe the best thing to do is to list the pros and cons and score it separately from various angles, as some people do, and when this is done and averaged, it becomes clear that this is a game that can only get a 7. The gameplay is clunky, the story pace is low, it feels like an adventure, but it doesn't have a meaningful story, and the picture quality is barely close to AAA productions from years ago, Days Gone for example is much better and smoother than this. Otherwise, it dragged me for hours and I played it, but that doesn't mean it's so great, flawless, complete that I would give it a 9, you can, but it would be a feeling grade. This game is available globally for $70 for the base game and $100 for the Premium Edition. It's a joke. That's slang for “ripping people off”. In other words, this game is not a top AAA production that will never fully justify this high price, no matter what anyone says and no matter how many 9-10 points they give it, this is the truth. If it met your expectations and you liked it very much, that's another matter. That's not the point we emphasize and draw attention to. The most beautiful and quality content of Indiana Jones and the Great Circle is the cinematics...
00:00 Raiders of the Lost Ark Section
11:02 Marshal College
27:00 Castle Sant'Angelo
48:07 Vatican City
03:27 Gizeh Egypt
06:22:38 The Himalayas
07:20:10 Sukothai
09:26:17 Ziggurat
03:27 Gizeh Egypt - there is mistake
@@TheGideonGames no
As an archaeologist, I love how the Indiana Jones series has stirred curiosity and love for history, but the constant destruction of historical buildings kills me.
I’m not an archaeologist and that same thing gets to even me so don’t feel alone 😂
People need to stop trying to compare this game to Tomb Raider and Uncharted. This game wanted to give a distinct feel than the other games. Indy never had the fast paced dynamic movements like Lara and Drake and even his fighting wasn’t all that quick and seamless. They wanted the movement and gameplay to be just like the films.
@@John-ns5se Bleep blop blork
Lara had to have been in Indy's classes as a student, while Nathan snuck into lectures to not have to pay for tuition
This is much better
Boy, Troy Baker really nailed the voice for the role. He sounds almost like a young Harrison Ford.
Rest in peace to the late Tony Todd who also voiced both The Fallen and Dreadwing in the Transformers franchise
The Beautiful and charismatic Tony Todd, aka The CandyMan Rest in Peace
I'm an old school Indy fan and this game actually has the movie series feel to it
Eagerly waiting for your game movie video bro...
Very soon, within the hour!
I guess they couldn't afford Harrison Ford's jawline
I knew something was off but couldn't put my finger on it.
That was 'too cutting edge' technology. 😏
That’s it! I knew something was missing.
His jaw they couldn't afford his voice that is Troy Baker
Only Harrison Ford can afford his jawline
It's just like the original movie!
thank you for the video. this was very nice to watch.
5:55:09 The thing I hate the most in a gameplay video is when they cut right where we're going to understand the solution and see how to move forward!
he cuts out the thinking process and failed attempts to get a better stream lined watchable experience, otherwise this would be double in length and a pain to upload !!!
Indiana Jones new game is incredible keep it up
Father i have sinned 2:02:22
Jesus Christ, what have you done?!?! 🤣🤣
Continue, my son.
The Wilhelm scream will never get old
6:24:55
am I the only one who laughed when I saw them walk on air when they came to a broken part of the bridge?
wow you are really fast, I hope to take a look of your walkthrough in the upcoming days....one question though ...does your vid also includes the DLC The Order of Giants? Thanks
Was waiting for this 🔥🔥
Does this game not have rights to music or is it turned off for copyright?
I can’t wait for the Lego Indiana Jones mod
Someone can't grab here? 8:24:16 i can't up to the wall. It's with some button? I think its bug for me
Wish they just recast Indy and make this into a film, would be brilliant
The sound design in this game is incredible
6:16:40 Scorpion King: "Welcome to the party, pal!"0 S
Would it be more accurate like there should be Japanese soldier instead of German soldier in Thailand.
It was 1937, Siam was not at war and the japanese are still battling China, no Japanese are stationed in Thailand before 1940. And the 'General' which I think is "Field Marshal Plaek Phibunsongkram' are a big fan of Facismo which would make sense if he opens the door for the german and italians
@ oh ic
@thanawatsakulkaew1123 thank you for telling us that I was kind of on the fence to about the Germans being there
I just finished playing this game and I really enjoyed it.
9:44:54 -- Gina's animation glitched out. It looks like she was trying to sit and then slide over something.
Come on! You ate a lemon straight up! The whole lemon!
2:30:20-2:31:15 damn it Gina, that hat is sacred and a national treasure!! Give that man his hat back 😂😂
In all my guess for that it could be, I would’ve never guessed that the treasure of the Great Circle was that!!!!!!!!🤯💥🤩
I guess all the other treasures got one upped by the one in this game because of how important it was in history
The clues seem to lead to it but I only thought it was a coincidence
I gotta say this is by far one of the best tie in game and years and this is made by the same folks I gave you Wolfenstein and doom and if you thought dial of destiny was alright and bombed💣 hard. well this game is amazing
14:15:36 HOW?
07:00:10 that guy was probably called Wilhelm
The only thing I don't like about this game is it keeps switching between 1st person and 3rd person. Is there a setting where it just stays on 1st person or 3rd person?
How long till the game movie is up
About 40 mins it'll be up
4:15:48 how did he figure it out ? What's the logic ???????
8:48:22 saving time
Outstanding game
Indiana Jones. It looks just like the original movie.
I think Indiana Jones main theme song would have worked there it's too bad it would be copyright
The Best game of the year
I've seen uncharted tomb raider yes they both amazing but each game has something special about it
Am I the only one thinking this is similar to the da Vinci code movie
You had to hit candy mane mane with the whip, huh?😂
Give them hell, Indiana Jones!
5:22:10 what is going on with this game
9:17:48 Assassin's Creed 2 reference. 🥰
My experience with Indiana Jones and the Great Circle and the results of some experiments:(only in a technical sense, about rtx, performance, overlock, 3090, 4090 etc.)
Well, as I said in my previous message, let those who have the means buy the latest ..90 series, since most of us do not have the means, it is most reasonable to buy two generations or the previous generation zero or second hand ..90 series.
Look, if the card is powerful and the vram is enough (i.e. ..90 series), there is no problem. You know what the only issue is? I mean, the only reason to buy the latest version ..90 series is RTX-Ray Tracing, which is what you really need. (I don't think that's a good reason to pay that much money either, but we've covered that below).
I mean, believe me, even in Full Ray Tracing, it doesn't affect the visual quality that much in most games, it doesn't make that much of a difference, but since it degrades performance and causes serious stuttering, that's where the 4090 is needed. For example, in the Indiana Jones game, which requires 4090 at ultra 4K settings, I only need it if ray tracing is full on, otherwise I can play with 3090 at ultra 4K with very good quality and full smoothness.
And you know what I did, of course it's not the same as trying with 4090, but I overlocked the ram and processor and this time I tried again with 3090 at 4K ultra and full ray tracing at the highest settings. Dlss off or on, but quality or automatic, I tried them all one by one. Normally, the game was getting sluggish with the 3090 when I turned on ray tracing before overclocking. So I agreed that it really needed 4090, but after overlocking, it didn't stutter at all, but with ray tracing, the ray tracing visuals were not so “Oh my! This has become a wonderful and indispensable visual feast! I should definitely get a 4090 or 5090!” there was no difference. In fact, the difference is almost non-existent in this game. Obviously, that new update for that rtx came for nothing, what difference did it make. Of course, these may vary according to the game, but this is my observation. There were already those who said that the visual quality was only 20% difference compared to 3090, but according to what and according to whom. Think about it, while it was only possible to play with full ray tracing with the 4090, I achieved the same possibility by safely and automatically overlocking the ram and processor in 5 minutes (with the Asus motherboard bios feature). So you really need to think about how necessary it really is. I mean, if there was a huge difference and all new games came out as a wonderful visual feast, but there is not. Therefore, this is the situation.
im watching a movies its helpful
is that the intro?
10:34 DESERVED Señor
Has anyone else suffered an unbearable bug after the 🐍 where he just doesn't attach to the vine when you are trying to climb the pyramid? It's like it's missing an animation where it jumps out to 3rd person and then you climb up. Been at it for like over an hour now and there's no animation for him to attach onto? Am I losing my mind and missing something ? 😂
9:10:00
Thai VA in this game is dopeee
I am still at the beginning i know he gets his British friends help. I was wondering does he get the guy who played gimli in lord of the rings as his character to help indy
I'd rather watch this play through than sit against through Dial of Destiny and Kingdom of the crystal skull.
FOR NVIDIA GRAPHICS CARDS THE ANSWER IS CLEAR, IT IS MORE IMPORTANT THAT IT IS THE TOP VERSION (..90), NOT THE NEW SERIES (4000, 5000)!
Note: This important observation is especially true for those with top-of-the-line PC hardware.
There is no in-between in this regard. I can't tell you how glad I am that I didn't make the grave mistake of leaving the 3090 and buying the 4080. I've been playing with Dlss turned off a lot lately anyway, the picture quality is much better. Anyone who reads and understands the article below understands very well that there is nothing in between. There is no need for that new generation in terms of performance for someone with a 3090 and good pc hardware. Look, I did not experience the slightest stuttering in stalker 2. The difference in image quality is very little difference between 3090-4090. A friend said 20 percent, but he is also unknown. Will these new low-quality games give us that 20% difference in image quality, let me laugh so that it is not wasted. The important thing for the 3090 owner is that the other components are top notch. And the screen too.
To make it more concrete in the mind: These guys are saying that you won't have performance problems with Dlss and your cards will last longer, right? But that's only partially true for those with relatively low PC hardware. And they confuse you with fancy presentations as if it improves the image quality. For example, for a long time, until I understood the business (and I'm so curious that I read and research, despite that), I envisioned Dlss as something that improves image quality. Then I realized that only ray tracing and a more powerful card improve the image quality. Never Dlss and Frame Generation.
1- Well, those with good PC hardware and powerful graphics cards don't need Dlss and Frame Generation anyway!
2- Those with low PC hardware or those with ..50, ..60, ..70 or even ..80 series, except for the ..90 series, will not be able to take full advantage of those image quality enhancing features because they will open Dlss in performance mode (dlss performance mode runs the game at 720p, like a joke) and will have to lower the game settings and turn off ray tracing! What do we understand now!
3- Let's talk about cards lasting longer. This is also a complete lie and something that will not happen for a significant part of the time, because you will not be able to use those new series cards comfortably for that long due to the lack of Vram. There is only one exception, because of the high Vram and power, and that is the ..90 series.
So the smartest investment for someone with a 3090 video card is to invest in PC hardware. For example, if the PC Ram is 16 GB, you should buy 32 or 64 GB Dual ram. Buy a PCIe 4.0 M2 SSD. Like upgrading the processor. These can be done easily with the money to be given to the card. The most obvious example of this happened in Stalker 2. Those with relatively low hardware and those without 32 ram could not play fluently. And this is the reason. PC ram scarcity. So the friend went and bought a 4060 or 4070 because it was the new series, the latest and most advanced technology. But this is the problem.
They deceive us so badly and they are so cunning that it is natural to be confused and deceived. I couldn't see the issue clearly for a long time. Then these points became clearer and clearer in my mind over time by thinking, researching, reading and comparing people's experiences and complaints.
The answer we wrote to a friend who has 4080 in his system and stated that he would save money for 5080:
“I wrote and write these things because I am not willing that anyone should pay a lot of money and not get what they pay for. Many people have accepted and confirmed this opinion and determination. Even those who had negative experiences in this direction shared them in detail. (Someone shared his regret in selling 3090 and buying 4080.) The essence of the issue is that we have determined that it is not appropriate to pay a ton of money to buy these cards, as the vram is insufficient in the current table (only 16 GB for 4080 and 5080), except for the latest top versions (..90). ...80 version cards are powerful, but they will not be able to use their power with 12, 16 GB vram, you will have to lower the settings in the face of games that consume 18-19 vram (Star Wars Outlaws for example). Unused power has no value. Dlss increases fps, lowers image resolution. But there is no solution to the lack of vram in 4000 series Dlss. Pay attention to this. Ray tracing also improves the image but decreases the fps. Therefore, with neither 4080 nor 5080 with 12 GB vram, you will not be able to play smoothly with maximum image quality at 4K ultra settings in many next generation games.
Yes, we accept that the new generation (4000, 5000) series cards are more powerful and can provide slightly better image quality, but using that power is only possible when the vram is high. Since this is not possible with vram, you will open Dlss, resolution will drop, you will open ray tracing, fps will drop.
So I mean, you will only be able to reach an image quality that the 3090 already provides more than enough (provided that you do not compromise on the fluent playing experience). So why would you pay for this stuff!
In this case, since the 3090 is 24 GB, it is inappropriate to drop it and pay a lot of money and buy 4080 or 5080 16 GB. In the current situation, I can easily say that if you can afford the 5090, buy it. If not, buy 4090. If you can't buy it either, buy 3090. But definitely do not buy 4080-5080 or lower versions. Of course, this applies to those who want 4K, smooth and high image quality gaming experience and those who already have a high-end PC hardware. But it also applies to those who settle for lesser image quality and lower settings. If you're playing 2K, why do you need a 4080, 5080? A more affordable card for that resolution will do the job. Since the need for vram will drop significantly there, there is no need to pay for power and technology that will not be used with the same logic.”
Does DLSS Increase FPS? Yes, DLSS can increase FPS (frames per second). By using AI-assisted sampling, the graphics card is enabled to render at a lower resolution and render the image at a higher resolution. This results in a smoother gaming experience with higher FPS.
Does DLSS Degrade the Image? DLSS is designed to improve image quality in general. However, in some cases, especially at low DLSS settings, blurs or other graphical anomalies may occur in the image. High DLSS modes minimize these problems.
Does DLSS Reduce VRAM? DLSS does not directly reduce VRAM usage, but it can help the graphics card use VRAM more efficiently. Because it starts by rendering at a lower resolution, the stress on VRAM is reduced, which can indirectly optimize VRAM usage.
Go to the doctor bro
I am quite sane, read the following:
“Friends who are curious about the 5000 series and hope that the new series will use less vram because of the vram type and Dlss 4, even though the amount of vram in the new series is still low in GB (12 and 16 gb, 5070 and 5080). Pay attention to this test.
The claim that the 5070 is twice the performance of the 3090 and the same as the 4090 is in my opinion a big deception and a lie, because unusable power means nothing. How can the 5070 with its 12gb of vram beat these cards with 24gb of vram! The point to note is that the 5080 and below are completely insufficient for 4K highest settings due to the low vram in the lower series except for the 90 series in the 5000 series cards. But very misleadingly, 5070, 3090 and 4090 are used as more performance. Let's see you try to use that performance in a game using 4k ultra and 18 gb vram, then the trick will be revealed.
Please see below the comparison of the 5000 series with the previous series, which nvidia supposedly praised with the phrases “higher performance and lower vram usage”. The test used Cyberpunk, which in the old case used 9 GB vram and could be run at 124 fps. With the 5000 series card and Dlss 4 and the new type of vram, the final situation is as follows: 8.6 vram and 137 fps. That's a one-tenth increase in fps and not even a one-tenth decrease in vram usage.
9 gb is good, let's simply multiply them by two: So in a game like Indiana Jones which uses 18 gb, the 5000 series is 8.6*2=17.2 GB
Yes, friends, if you are going to use 4K and you are going to do it at the highest settings, it is already clear that the 5000 series (including 5080), except for the 5090, will be insufficient for 4K and for such games. So there are two possibilities, either you will buy 5090 or you will buy and use the ..90 series of one of the old series. 3090 and 4090 24 GB.”
voice actor for jones kinda mehhh, fight scene too
I accept Jesus Christ as my Lord and savior.
Friends who are curious about the 5000 series and hope that the new series will use less vram because of the vram type and Dlss 4, even though the amount of vram in the new series is still low in GB (12 and 16 gb, 5070 and 5080). Pay attention to this test.
The claim that the 5070 is twice the performance of the 3090 and the same as the 4090 is in my opinion a big deception and a lie, because unusable power means nothing. How can the 5070 with its 12gb of vram beat these cards with 24gb of vram! The point to note is that the 5080 and below are completely insufficient for 4K highest settings due to the low vram in the lower series except for the 90 series in the 5000 series cards. But very misleadingly, 5070, 3090 and 4090 are used as more performance. Let's see you try to use that performance in a game using 4k ultra and 18 gb vram, then the trick will be revealed.
Please see below the comparison of the 5000 series with the previous series, which nvidia supposedly praised with the phrases “higher performance and lower vram usage”. The test used Cyberpunk, which in the old case used 9 GB vram and could be run at 124 fps. With the 5000 series card and Dlss 4 and the new type of vram, the final situation is as follows: 8.6 vram and 137 fps. That's a one-tenth increase in fps and not even a one-tenth decrease in vram usage.
9 gb is good, let's simply multiply them by two: So in a game like Indiana Jones which uses 18 gb, the 5000 series is 8.6*2=17.2 GB
Yes, friends, if you are going to use 4K and you are going to do it at the highest settings, it is already clear that the 5000 series (including 5080), except for the 5090, will be insufficient for 4K and for such games. So there are two possibilities, either you will buy 5090 or you will buy and use the ..90 series of one of the old series. 3090 and 4090 24 GB.
This spectacular game ridicules even more "dial of destiny". Even 5 minutes of it have more soul than latest (and last) indy movie..
Man I knew I was gonna see this type of comment but not this fast. 😂😂😂😂
FYI STRAMBO is Italian for WEIRD. Gina is calling you weird or a weirdo hahahahahaha all the way through the game hahahahaha To The Beautiful and charismatic Tony Todd, aka Locus aka The CandyMan sadly passed away early November at the young age of 70 my friend Rest in Peace
Endgame was so painfull to play its feels rush as fuck
Soo happy hearing Thai language in a AAA video game, but it weirds the accent and way they speak is soo formal, like too formal, not something a countryside folks here would speak. In the game, they speak in a formal noble kind of way.
merry rizzmas
*SPOILER WARNING!*
If there is one thing that I would criticize this game for: I don’t like how we’re chasing another judeo-christian artifact. Its not offensive or anything, we’ve just trod this ground twice before and I think it’d be neat to see other things. Like, idk, the Armor of Achilles or something. Give an excuse to have Zeus smite somebody.
This game is something! It really makes you feel like a geriatric 80 year old man. Neat!
🎉
Keine Blutefekte was soll das
The part where he replace the artifact is stupid, he is supposed to know exat;y where is goes.
Friends, let's sit down and talk straight now, okay, Indiana game is beautiful in many ways, but it has many shortcomings and weaknesses, but I can say this clearly, it is definitely not the AAA game of 2024, and it does not offer a visual feast that deserves 4090 at 4K ultra settings, so I'm not saying it's bad, I'm saying it's not as good and top-notch in every aspect as it is exaggerated in the promotions. The real AAA games that came out years ago look much, much better and smoother than these new releases and Indiana in every aspect. The gameplay is clunky, the pace isn't high enough, the graphics aren't that top-notch, and the artificial intelligence is nowhere to be seen. Now it's impossible to understand why some people give it 9-10.
I think 9-10 is very inaccurate and too high. When we take into account the good, bad and average things, it can only be 7. The gameplay is very clunky. The story and sense of adventure is not very paced. So a 7 is appropriate. I mean, it's so strange that the game is given a 9-10. And you're going to give 13-15 to much better games than this! This is ridiculous. Stalker 2 getting a 7 is another absurdity. It deserves a score like 4-5.
Please try to understand my logic, it's wrong to give 9-10 points out of the blue just because something is nice and you like it, because something is done well. There are many flaws and weaknesses in this game, yes there are some very good things, but they cannot be a justification for giving 9-10 points. Maybe the best thing to do is to list the pros and cons and score it separately from various angles, as some people do, and when this is done and averaged, it becomes clear that this is a game that can only get a 7. The gameplay is clunky, the story pace is low, it feels like an adventure, but it doesn't have a meaningful story, and the picture quality is barely close to AAA productions from years ago, Days Gone for example is much better and smoother than this. Otherwise, it dragged me for hours and I played it, but that doesn't mean it's so great, flawless, complete that I would give it a 9, you can, but it would be a feeling grade.
This game is available globally for $70 for the base game and $100 for the Premium Edition. It's a joke. That's slang for “ripping people off”. In other words, this game is not a top AAA production that will never fully justify this high price, no matter what anyone says and no matter how many 9-10 points they give it, this is the truth. If it met your expectations and you liked it very much, that's another matter. That's not the point we emphasize and draw attention to.
The most beautiful and quality content of Indiana Jones and the Great Circle is the cinematics...
INDIANA JONES AND 10 HOURS OF BOREDOM
U should be more expert in playing.
If you are serious about what you are doing, you need to stop uploading FPS games that you play with a controller.
This story is sooooooo much better than Dial of Destiny and much less woke. Disney must not have had any involvement in this game
Bro does not know who developed the game
bro does not. But judging by the non-woke theme of the game……it APPEARS as if Disney had no involvement.
Boring
this game sucks. Indy is trying to save the world. the reporter is hung up on her sister.