Applied predictive shooting

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 4 ก.ย. 2024
  • Benstoeger.com
    Benstoegerproshop.com for gear
    PSTG.US for in person classes and digital coaching
    Ben Stoeger books on Amazon: www.amazon.com...
    Podcast from pstg:
    traininggroupl...

ความคิดเห็น • 29

  • @carrolladams3193
    @carrolladams3193 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    “Get comfortable with being uncomfortable”… I like that approach. You’re going to feel uncomfortable, but that’s OK; it won’t kill you.

  • @carlcole
    @carlcole 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    "As much as you guys may not like that." I feel attacked.🤣

  • @uncleB1972
    @uncleB1972 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    These blips are Awesome!!! I get to sit with my Espresso Frappuccino and learn from you!

  • @ezhang128
    @ezhang128 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thank you again sir!

  • @NDcompetitiveshooter
    @NDcompetitiveshooter 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This is gold :)

  • @713KaiWin
    @713KaiWin 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I think investing in some custom mold active ear pro would be a good investment for you especially as an instructor. Helps save more of your hearing and makes talking with students easier with not having to take them in and out all the time

    • @BenStoeger187
      @BenStoeger187  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      I obviously disagree with you

    • @InjunJoe-sh7wn
      @InjunJoe-sh7wn 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      My experience with even very expensive electronic ear pro is that they don’t do as good as traditional ear plugs. Plus batteries are dumb and will fail at some point.

    • @Shadow__133
      @Shadow__133 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      You say like losing a bit of hearing is a bad thing.
      Not married much, are you? 😂

    • @713KaiWin
      @713KaiWin 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@InjunJoe-sh7wn thats why u get in ear, ear pro so when the batteries fail theyre still just earplugs

    • @713KaiWin
      @713KaiWin 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@BenStoeger187 can you explain why if possible? Just wondering as i started shooting a year ago with some walkers and after a doctors recommendation of getting some molds it's helped a lot with preserving what left i have of hearing and itd help to hear another perspective.

  • @piotrbilon9564
    @piotrbilon9564 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ben, are you able to call your shots shooting predictibly? I do struggle to shoot targets during the match as fast as I shoot the targets doing the doubles drill without "match pressure". Any advice how to overcome this or should I just work hard to get there?

  • @Nick--_
    @Nick--_ 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Is the position of your mag pouches in this video how you would run them in a match?

    • @EuropaChronicles
      @EuropaChronicles 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I don’t understand the question. This is how Ben ran his belt when he was a multitime National Champion.

  • @YVK_
    @YVK_ 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    At 10 yards most people will likely be predictive at 0.18 or less, and will likely call both shots at 0.25, for a difference of 0.07 (see if you agree with this). A three targets array will give just over 0.2 sec advantage for predictive over reactive. If shooter throws in only one C, they'll have to run the stage at 10 HF to make it a wash. 5 HF stage will penalize you twice over. Do a video on risk/reward of predictive shooting in matches. I feel like it is only justifiable if you can guarantee all As, or HF is very high buy I could be wrong.

    • @BenStoeger187
      @BenStoeger187  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      I would rather make a video about how the way you analyze things is holding you back in your development.

    • @YVK_
      @YVK_ 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Anything that can help my development, including a critique of my analysis, is appreciated. I shoot predictive a lot, both in practice and matches. What I wrote is an observation from a personal experience, not a theoretical pontifications.

    • @coheetabemasu8130
      @coheetabemasu8130 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Well, the difference is a lot more for me. Predictive splits are 0.18-0.20. Reactive are often 0.35+.

    • @michall3918
      @michall3918 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Reactive 0.25 seems crazy fast. I can call my shots at predictive pace of about 0.18 but calling is not reactive, 0.3 is super fast reactive shot for me and 0.35 good

    • @EuropaChronicles
      @EuropaChronicles 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      “Most people” are not shooting 0.18s predictively & 0.25s reactively at 10 yards.

  • @ecalzo
    @ecalzo 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Hey BEn.. why TOP Shooter does have electronics ear muffs or electronics ear plugs (tons of $) and you have simple Ear Plugs??? i am doing the same myself just wondering ..

    • @InjunJoe-sh7wn
      @InjunJoe-sh7wn 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Maybe not what Ben would say, but my words-batteries are stupid. They quit on you at the worst times and electronic ear pro is expensive. Lose them or break them in the middle of a match and you’re hosed. Rubber or foam is cheap and easy to carry and you can carry extras for super cheap. Oh, you’re already doing that!😊

    • @ecalzo
      @ecalzo 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@InjunJoe-sh7wn yessir... been doing that for quite a bit .. :-) old school..

    • @Shadow__133
      @Shadow__133 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I think electronic ear plugs are inherently unsafe.
      Earmuffs are cumbersome and he would be constantly removing it to speak between sets.
      I would opt for the same in his situation.