Please make eq. of time. Think time as force that has vecter and size(amount). There must be way to send signals to past. I have to save my father Kim Kyu Dong.
These do not apply to anything that can't be approximated as a point source. When Gauss' law does not apply the inverse square law does not apply. This is also a vastly simplified concept of how the fundamental physics works. It also assumes that there is no possible restriction to a field, that can cancel out or amplify a signal.
I think inverse square law is older. Like maybe Euclid. The inverse square law is geometric, because you will look 4 times smaller to me at double the distance. Apparent size is inversely proportional to distance. So maybe the ancients did not say "inverse square law", but I think they understood how surfaces expand out from a point according to those same rules. * all IMO
This could have been longer, I would have liked to see some in depth clips of you going through an equation. I believe relativistic effects would play a stronger role, because ultimately extrinsic preference is derived to intrinsic properties, and the more absolute those properties, the more easier it is to interpret out their value. But that would mean that extrinsic values are extensions of intrinsic evaluation, and that the simple 1 value per extension would mean things one can label. If they exist in a labelling system, then it must be tuned to attract permanently. Our socio-sexual attraction therefore exists not only in intersections during interaction, but also changes relative to the actions we take in those pockets such as to determine the outcome regardless of chemistry (intersecting extrinsic values). Relativity would mean here how our intrinsic value allows for translations into extrinsic reality. the paradox: by increasic absolute intrinsic value, one may reduce the sexual to the benefit of the social. Nevertheless, the potential mates will increase with 0-reality content: it will just be people on the same wavelength. It might take a social system to recollapse people into productive mating again. Perhaps to collapse many values onto just one will effect the conception of others, even the one you might prefer be conserved.
There is so much to say about this video oh my goodness. Anthropic domain??? Good sir you cannot just use Newton’s law, then Coulomb’s law and then drop this hot ball of unexplained schizophrenia right after it… that’s now how solid logical arguments are built
![ตีสิบเดย์ [FULL] | เปิดใจ "อาจารย์ เบียร์ ฅนตื่นธรรม" นักสนทนาธรรมสายดุดัน!](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/vqaBI_mnoDk/mqdefault.jpg)
My god this might be the most schizophrenic video i have ever seen
Waiting for "he looks like tommyinnit" comment
Interesting concept. Are there other sources available on the subject?
Please make eq. of time. Think time as force that has vecter and size(amount). There must be way to send signals to past. I have to save my father Kim Kyu Dong.
how to say you dont understand social studies without saying you dont understand social studies
These do not apply to anything that can't be approximated as a point source.
When Gauss' law does not apply the inverse square law does not apply.
This is also a vastly simplified concept of how the fundamental physics works.
It also assumes that there is no possible restriction to a field, that can cancel out or amplify a signal.
I think inverse square law is older. Like maybe Euclid. The inverse square law is geometric, because you will look 4 times smaller to me at double the distance. Apparent size is inversely proportional to distance. So maybe the ancients did not say "inverse square law", but I think they understood how surfaces expand out from a point according to those same rules. * all IMO
An example would have helped for each.
This could have been longer, I would have liked to see some in depth clips of you going through an equation.
I believe relativistic effects would play a stronger role, because ultimately extrinsic preference is derived to intrinsic properties, and the more absolute those properties, the more easier it is to interpret out their value.
But that would mean that extrinsic values are extensions of intrinsic evaluation, and that the simple 1 value per extension would mean things one can label. If they exist in a labelling system, then it must be tuned to attract permanently. Our socio-sexual attraction therefore exists not only in intersections during interaction, but also changes relative to the actions we take in those pockets such as to determine the outcome regardless of chemistry (intersecting extrinsic values). Relativity would mean here how our intrinsic value allows for translations into extrinsic reality.
the paradox: by increasic absolute intrinsic value, one may reduce the sexual to the benefit of the social. Nevertheless, the potential mates will increase with 0-reality content: it will just be people on the same wavelength. It might take a social system to recollapse people into productive mating again. Perhaps to collapse many values onto just one will effect the conception of others, even the one you might prefer be conserved.
There is so much to say about this video oh my goodness. Anthropic domain??? Good sir you cannot just use Newton’s law, then Coulomb’s law and then drop this hot ball of unexplained schizophrenia right after it… that’s now how solid logical arguments are built
Dude I feel like I look so much like you I might be related to you, is there anyone in your family with the name Durkin or pazack or something
Omniman
Bruh
🤦♂️
wut