Confirmation of a Problem With Gravity Nobody Can Explain : S8 Tension

แชร์
ฝัง

ความคิดเห็น • 1.1K

  • @quantumfoam539
    @quantumfoam539 ปีที่แล้ว +641

    I was trying to sleep. Then there was a cosmological crisis..

    • @Anthony-qy5yw
      @Anthony-qy5yw ปีที่แล้ว +4

      👍

    • @daffyduck780
      @daffyduck780 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      So it was your fault!!!

    • @metatechnologist
      @metatechnologist ปีที่แล้ว +12

      It's why we have Anton. To keep us informed when it comes up!

    • @zoookx
      @zoookx ปีที่แล้ว +1

      😂

    • @dananorth895
      @dananorth895 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Sounds like a job for.......SPACE FORCE! 😂

  • @GodwynDi
    @GodwynDi ปีที่แล้ว +178

    I dont see it as a crisis. It just means there is still more for us to learn which I find wonderful.

    • @JeffofCurious
      @JeffofCurious ปีที่แล้ว +6

      It never ends, thankfully

    • @skateboardingjesus4006
      @skateboardingjesus4006 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I have a cosmological crisis.
      If we're now seeing the furthest galaxies as they were 13 billion years ago, how comes 2 billion years after the big bang we were seeing those much closer galaxies as they were then (given the smaller intervening space light had to travel)? That implies that over the intervening 11 billion years, they haven't appeared to age and in fact appear younger? Is there something fundamental I'm not seeing, because that is perplexing?

    • @NeonVisual
      @NeonVisual ปีที่แล้ว +2

      The problem is when we keep learning different things depending on how we measure the same thing, which is a problem when we learn everything by measuring it.

    • @oberonpanopticon
      @oberonpanopticon ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@skateboardingjesus4006 Why do galaxies being closer in the past imply that they’ve appeared to get younger since then?

    • @EternalSearcher
      @EternalSearcher ปีที่แล้ว

      No, for people like you it's not a crisis, it's more opportunity to invent some "super mysterious fairy energy" to make your failing theories still give correct predictions after the fact.

  • @stewartabernathy6436
    @stewartabernathy6436 ปีที่แล้ว +219

    I've always wondered does the universe spin? I mean everything in it spins, so does it also spin? And if it does how does that affect its properties?

    • @pereloup
      @pereloup ปีที่แล้ว +68

      According to the cosmological principle, the universe is isotropic. If it spins, there would be a preferential direction which contradicts the principle. Everything in the universe spins in different directions and the total angular momentum must be zero.

    • @Jadamhodges
      @Jadamhodges ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Can there be a centrifugal force employed through a spinning? We would need something outside the universe relative to the rotation to make that possible right?

    • @MW-cx3sb
      @MW-cx3sb ปีที่แล้ว +6

      And what is it spinning around...
      Maybe there is something into separate multiverse bubbles after all like some talking heads and physicists think.

    • @sitindogmas
      @sitindogmas ปีที่แล้ว +18

      ​@@pereloupallegedly

    • @AXharoth
      @AXharoth ปีที่แล้ว +1

      good question , and kinda makes original question sounds ridiculous xD @@MW-cx3sb

  • @DataIsBeautifulOfficial
    @DataIsBeautifulOfficial ปีที่แล้ว +107

    Gravity is bitchin'

    • @douglaswilkinson5700
      @douglaswilkinson5700 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Mass curves spacetime. We experience this curvature as gravity. When you wave your hand it creates gravitational waves.

    • @anthonyowen6204
      @anthonyowen6204 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Space and time are as real as a shadow if a shadow is the absence of light what is space the absence of ?

    • @vensroofcat6415
      @vensroofcat6415 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@anthonyowen6204 oh, but you wouldn't see a shadow if there wasn't a single photon left in your universe. Moreover there wouldn't be any shadow.
      Absence of light are quite strong words.

    • @Flesh_Wizard
      @Flesh_Wizard ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Gravity on that crazy wrap spacetime darkness pack

    • @anthonyowen6204
      @anthonyowen6204 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes no photons no shadows think about a second

  • @Mephistahpheles
    @Mephistahpheles ปีที่แล้ว +31

    "Reworked once again". I firmly believe the problem is "epicircle"-esque.
    We've got something very basic VERY wrong, and have built up convoluted theories & explanations, and keep tweaking them to try to make them work.
    It's likely something we're so indoctrinated to believe, we don't even consider challenging it.

    • @Fido-vm9zi
      @Fido-vm9zi ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Exactly right

    • @ThePowerLover
      @ThePowerLover ปีที่แล้ว

      Science is always like that, what option is better?

    • @MegaBanne
      @MegaBanne ปีที่แล้ว

      Even when all the gravity models of anything larger than a solar system was disproved, they just used their imagination.
      As if the universe gives a shit about peoples emotional attachment to certain forces of nature.
      Dark matter is not science in any way or form.

    • @MegaBanne
      @MegaBanne ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ThePowerLover
      Dark matter is not science.
      Neither is dark energy.
      Just untestable nonsense made up so that astronomers and cosmologists don't have to question their BS dogma.

    • @Crikey420
      @Crikey420 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Everyone has faith in something

  • @snjsilvan
    @snjsilvan ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Thank you, Anton. You, sir, are a wonderful person.

  • @aclearlight
    @aclearlight ปีที่แล้ว +9

    So, just checking, this indicates that the drop from 0.8159 to our current and locally-observed 0.7xx leads to less clumpiness now and that this decrement only kicked in relatively recently? That is indeed wonderfully mysterious! Wow!

  • @michaelcox1071
    @michaelcox1071 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Cosmological Crisis would be a great band name.

  • @entropybear5847
    @entropybear5847 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    It's amazing how much of cosmology is "we saw something unexpected, are our models wrong?" "Nah, just add dark energy/matter and call it resolved".

    • @Nat-oj2uc
      @Nat-oj2uc ปีที่แล้ว

      Spot on. That's so lazy. Unbelievable they've gotten away with it for so long

    • @Oblivion___
      @Oblivion___ ปีที่แล้ว

      This reminds me of the joke about scientists in the 20th century:
      "Are your models of the universe wrong? Just add another dimension."

    • @mr-x7689
      @mr-x7689 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Arkhams razor. "The simplest explanation is usually the best one" Aka. we got somthing wrong at some point, and instead of trying to figure out what/where we fucked up, we instead invent new stuff to "avoid" dealing with it.
      Odds are that what ever we fucked up is simple and easy to miss, or just a miniscule factor we forgot to add or tweak to/in the equations, and once "Scaled up" works to a certain point then starts to cause problems.
      I'm shit at math, so i can't partake in that part of the discussion. But i know math well enough that the more complex the equation needed, the easier it is to miss something, which can cause the entire thing to give you a semi working solution that seams to be correct, but in fact isen't.
      It's a bit like spitting in the ocean, and proclaim you have increased it's volume. It's partly correct, but you also need to factor in the evaporation of moisture, and rain elswhere. thusly making said luggie completely meaningless in the grand equation in this case.

  • @gribbo001
    @gribbo001 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    A parallel universe either approached us and whisked by a few billions years ago is what influenced into our universe via gravity (huge) and declumping as observed in our universe

  • @carollane8694
    @carollane8694 ปีที่แล้ว +41

    Bless you Anton for bringing so many amazing and informative videos but please also take good care of yourself.

    • @carollane8694
      @carollane8694 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @BernieGore-fs2is his smile at the end looks like someone still trying to cope with a lot of sadness to me. If you have followed this channel for any length of time you'll understand why that should be.

    • @edit4310
      @edit4310 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Just the typical NPC comment when a video is released. Sabine H, Matt O'D. Arvin A. etc also have the same kinds of 'first comments'. They tend to garner 'likes' so monkey see, monkey do. @BernieGore-fs2is Yes he's had a loss, and we don't know how he's coping with that, but that's not the reason for the cheesy grin at the end lol he does that all the time.

    • @IlluminovaNibiru
      @IlluminovaNibiru ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks for teaching us Anton. Anton > Neil on DeGrass Thiessen. Love ❤️ Anton 2:40

    • @carollane8694
      @carollane8694 ปีที่แล้ว

      @edit4310 spoken like a true incel

  • @quenepas415
    @quenepas415 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Anton you should be at 3mil+ subs by now Thanks for all you do

  • @Techmagus76
    @Techmagus76 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Thanks Anton, very interesting. We will have to see how much S8 tension is left over once the models include the much higher average density of the galaxies were we get strong hints at the moment in that direction and the calculations are adapted to this. If i remember correct even this channel made a video about using high energy gamma reys and the influence which plasma clouds have on them, which pointed in the direction of much denser galaxies then actual calculations are using.

  • @edwardallan197
    @edwardallan197 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Anton stays on the edge of discovery! Really potent! ❤

  • @ogwarfthedawf
    @ogwarfthedawf ปีที่แล้ว +24

    I absolutely love times like these. They allow for new ideas, and new perspectives.

    • @goyonman9655
      @goyonman9655 ปีที่แล้ว

      And what's good about "new ideas" and "new perspectives"

    • @ogwarfthedawf
      @ogwarfthedawf ปีที่แล้ว

      @@goyonman9655 Because my friend, it brings us closer to the truth.

    • @goyonman9655
      @goyonman9655 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ogwarfthedawf
      Wrong
      New ideas are as likely to take us away from "tRuTh" as to bring us nearer
      There is nothing meritorious in in the fact that a Idea is new

    • @ogwarfthedawf
      @ogwarfthedawf ปีที่แล้ว

      @@goyonman9655 As I am today, I would say that to understand the true nature of the universe, you have to be open to change and new ideas. There's nuggets of gold in every idea. Life, the universe and everything is the greatest puzzle of all-time, our understanding of physics and science as a whole represesents our attempts to solve it! We've solved most of the puzzle that we can see, touch and feel, but it's just the tip of the iceberg. The rest of the puzzle is hidden, speculative! Not black or white, but ultra-violet!
      So it ultimately depends on how badly you want to know the answer.
      I think it's pretty fun though, even if I'm wrong; it's a mistake I can learn from. A new experience from which new ideas can are born.

    • @ogwarfthedawf
      @ogwarfthedawf ปีที่แล้ว

      LOL minor spelling mistake!! 🤣

  • @lightien
    @lightien ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This is crazy. It is always good to see crisis in physics/cosmology so we can advance our understanding.

  • @TheJpf79
    @TheJpf79 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    "Did gravity change" or do scientist simply not know everything but have ran under the assunption that they do know everything for years. At some point they forgot that "I don't know" is a valid answer.

    • @mr-x7689
      @mr-x7689 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Most likely we missed somthing werry small but obviously important thing in our equations, and once scaled enough it breaks the "working" molds.
      Or maybe its aliens fucking with us. (i'm not serious)
      You know the fishbowl theory? Where a advanced alien civilisation is observing us like we observe a fish in a bowl. But the aliens decided to fuck with us, and tweaking the things we see. Making us go "WHAT THE FUCK!?!" while they laugh their arses off. A bit like how we humans mess with zoo animals.

  • @shannonwall8413
    @shannonwall8413 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Hello Wonderful Anton! Thank-you for all you do.

  • @wayneharrison
    @wayneharrison ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I remember once, witnessing two river merges... one being mainly flesh water in composition, while the other being mainly salt water, with the latter being influenced via a king tide from the estuary/ocean mouth. At the interconnecting points along these merging zones, eddies formed, with very unusual laminar flow patterns... some slow by way of high resistance, while others, were akin to white water rapids. Could this be a similar pattern of behaviour that our Universe may be experiencing? In that, instead of merging rivers... a similar result happens, with merging Universes, that's causing these strange varying expansion rates, caused by varying resistance points at these intermingling fronts of these opposing Universes? I may wrong though... just a thought?🤔

    • @Items_I_Find_Interesting
      @Items_I_Find_Interesting ปีที่แล้ว +1

      What’s flesh water? Sounds gross

    • @Lightning_Lance
      @Lightning_Lance ปีที่แล้ว +1

      If the universe is stretching faster in some areas than others, it could be analogous to a still pond with rain drops falling in it, causing ripples in spacetime?

  • @cjam8293
    @cjam8293 ปีที่แล้ว

    Not only the videos but also the comments are more interesting than other TH-cam channels. Thanks Anton for helping me keep my brain active

  • @ScurvyDawg
    @ScurvyDawg ปีที่แล้ว +19

    Phenomenal episode, thank you, Anton.

  • @zephyrdaz
    @zephyrdaz ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks

  • @dmedic213
    @dmedic213 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    Finally new theories, new findings, I am so curious what comes next. Variable Gravity? Maybe it goes from one state to another in billions of years? ✌

    • @deviljetsay4732
      @deviljetsay4732 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Of course ❤

    • @mikemcglauflin8985
      @mikemcglauflin8985 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      I can't weight!

    • @dmedic213
      @dmedic213 ปีที่แล้ว

      Like a breathing organism. Going from Big Bang to Big Bang. Imagine that

    • @crabby7668
      @crabby7668 ปีที่แล้ว

      Maybe gravity is like a spring or rubber band? Negative or repulsive until the universe gets to a neutral expansion point and then gradually increasingly attractive until another end point before the universe collapses back in an eternal oscillation. Maybe its like a hookes constant or something?
      Why does gravity have to be a constant? Maybe it just appears to be at this point in time and gradually getting stronger over millions or billions of years until it arrests the expansion of the universe and reverses it. Then as the universe collapses gravity gets progressively less attractive until it goes through the neutral point and then gets progressively more repulsive as the universe shrinks back to the big bang point where it reverses yet again.
      May sound daft but it gets rid of the need for. Bogus non proven fudge factors such as dark matter which begat dark energy because it doesn't work. And as far as I can tell dark energy doesn't work satisfactorily either so will need another dark fudge of some sort. Make gravity variable and maybe you won't need any of the fudge dark or otherwise.

  • @strezztechnoid
    @strezztechnoid ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Condensed matter theory beyond the classic physics model, not a theory of quantum gravity, but a hypothesis describing forcing in specific density events has been a field of study from some time, I discussed with with a professor from Caltech. Something similar to freezing a carbonized soda but in a natural state, and when a triggering event pops the top of the soda expressing accelerated gases from the container.

    • @herrweiss2580
      @herrweiss2580 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Mountain Dew
      to the rescue.

  • @lilliclementine8119
    @lilliclementine8119 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    TH-cam has down that I reported your video for misinformation! I did not, I don't know what their problem is.

    • @RealitysVoice
      @RealitysVoice ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Flat earther 😂

    • @FreejackVesa
      @FreejackVesa ปีที่แล้ว +2

      TH-cam has been giving me notices about spamming. I've never spammed any comments in my life. TH-cam is sketchy

    • @dananorth895
      @dananorth895 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Damn!...I don't feel so bad now. I got blocked for 23 hrs for....get ready..." Spamming, Misinformation, and Scamming) 😂
      Like we don't know who the actual scammers are?😮

    • @RealitysVoice
      @RealitysVoice ปีที่แล้ว

      @BernieGore-fs2is what has a vaccine got to do with the earth's shape?

    • @FreejackVesa
      @FreejackVesa ปีที่แล้ว

      @BernieGore-fs2is ok, back to your box now.

  • @-jeff-
    @-jeff- ปีที่แล้ว +1

    TY Anton for showing us that the universe is once again proving itself stranger than we currently can imagine.

    • @jarrettesselman8144
      @jarrettesselman8144 ปีที่แล้ว

      Real people don’t like Anton. Remove the bots and he is a nobody.

  • @mt_baldwin
    @mt_baldwin ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Physics holds up in the middle. But first we had a problem on the very small side and now the very large side. So I think it's going to be another field of physics that solves this, like quantum physics did.

    • @richardkammerer2814
      @richardkammerer2814 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      This calls for a $25M grant. Since you proposed it, would you be willing to undertake this 50-year quest?

    • @ferd1775
      @ferd1775 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      ​@@richardkammerer2814I'll certainly take a crack at it for the money involved 😂

    • @susanbruce8974
      @susanbruce8974 ปีที่แล้ว

      Solved: See Nassim Haramein

  • @axle.australian.patriot
    @axle.australian.patriot ปีที่แล้ว +1

    5:45 Approach it by by changing perspective from an expanding universe to a shrinking universe. If you take the position that the universe is shrinking or deflating, then much of the weird and missing physics begins to make sense.
    >
    P.S. I am confident that this perspective removes the need for the elusive dark energy :)

  • @edreusser4741
    @edreusser4741 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    It seems evident to me that because of this and other measurements, the Milky Way along with the rest of the local group lives within an unusually low density area of the universe. I am not sufficiently mathematically trained to be able to calculate the chances of this happening, but the existence of enormous voids (e.g. the Bootes void) indicates that could happen by random chance. While this might be statistically extremely unlikely from the standpoint of a single area, the question boils down to what might be called the meta-clumpiness of the universe. That is, how much the clumpiness varies from place to place. If this value is sufficiently large, we may find that most of the universe is organized into regions where this clumpiness value is either very low or very high.

    • @digilyd
      @digilyd ปีที่แล้ว +3

      The gravity of neighbour-universes may be a bit of a spanner in the works.

    • @MichaelLeBlanc-p4f
      @MichaelLeBlanc-p4f ปีที่แล้ว

      Don't know anything of value about endless space in time or tiny atoms which is why I am astonished by the possibility that voids actually exist. Perhaps than makes me a solid-block universalist in spirit.

    • @wingset
      @wingset ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Ancient people loved the Boötes constellation for some reason.

    • @empyrean196
      @empyrean196 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I thought we already knew about cosmic web. So the universe is relatively full of voids, and filaments. Which involves matter/energy densities.

    • @TheKrispyfort
      @TheKrispyfort ปีที่แล้ว +1

      We're in a massive mixing bowl trying to achieve a homogeneous mixture

  • @Carcerian
    @Carcerian ปีที่แล้ว +2

    It's almost as if the universe is bound together as part of a single interconnected whole, who's forces are beyond our meager comprehension... 💭

  • @gkirmathal
    @gkirmathal ปีที่แล้ว +5

    What a wonderful and electrifying conundrum! Really wonder if they can find some fundamental and known physics to help them understand what is happening.

    • @spezzington
      @spezzington ปีที่แล้ว +2

      See what you did there ;-)

  • @garyfrancis6193
    @garyfrancis6193 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I agree. I sometimes have a problem with gravity.

  • @_Graham7
    @_Graham7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Does it only expand if it's being observed?

  • @MaxMisterC
    @MaxMisterC ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I suffer with terrible Galactic Winds
    My Black Hole's Regular Emmisions
    Tho' exotic, interact with gas pressure
    But just don't relieve my, Clumpy, S8 tension! 😊

  • @sdwone
    @sdwone ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Gravity continues to illuminate us, with even more mysteries... Which is a bit strange, considering that it's probably the easiest known force to grasp 🤔
    But also perhaps, gravity is the key, to unlocking the secrets of the Universe Itself.
    In any case, we are reminded once again, that perhaps some of our theories on gravity, are not as tight as once thought. Which is MUSIC to the ears of any budding Theoretical Physicist 😊

    • @oberonpanopticon
      @oberonpanopticon ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Maybe it’s just the easiest force to think you grasp

    • @Nat-oj2uc
      @Nat-oj2uc ปีที่แล้ว

      @@oberonpanopticon lol agreed. No one has a clue what is gravity

    • @oberonpanopticon
      @oberonpanopticon ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Nat-oj2uc If only we all had vivid imaginations and worked in Swiss patent offices…

    • @sdwone
      @sdwone ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@oberonpanopticon Indeed! I mean classically at least, gravity is quite easy to grasp. The mathematics of General Relativity are absolutely Beautiful! Which is why, among other things, Einstein deserves the recognition of Genius!
      And even if we do find a quantum flavour of gravity, his classical works, much like Newton's, will STILL be useful and valid!
      But yes, at least on the quantum level, Gravity still remains to be one of our Biggest of unsolved mysteries. Which, as I said, gets Physicists excited!
      I think people outside this field, have this erroneous perception that, anomalies in our understanding of the Universe is a bad thing! That couldn't be further from the Truth! Because it actually means that we learn something new, get a chance to refine our theories, and get another step closer on that long road called Human Progress 👍🏼

    • @oberonpanopticon
      @oberonpanopticon ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@sdwone Being wrong is (sometimes) the most exciting thing in science

  • @a.westenholz4032
    @a.westenholz4032 ปีที่แล้ว

    I confess that I really like every time there's evidence that we may still be getting something fundamentally wrong. I think we need the reminder. As human knowledge and science has progressed so fast over such a short period of time, constantly rapidly forging ahead, and trying to make conclusions about the entire universe based on current knowledge (well what else can we do?), reminders like these that we may be getting something very fundamentally wrong are important to keeping us humble. We are after all a species who have only just begun to look at the universe and don't even have the capability to leave our own little tiny spec of planet to verify what's even out there in reality.

  • @dougselby7592
    @dougselby7592 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    My feeling is that leaving magnetic fields out of the simulation might have been a mistake. A greater than expected influence from this quarter may eventually hold the keys to these tensions.

    • @2013Arcturus
      @2013Arcturus ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Yup, Electric Universe Theory (and its proponents) is kooky, but their criticism of the lack of electromagnetism in cosmological theories in on point. The fixation of gravity, while obviously a huge factor, is absurd.

    • @grawss
      @grawss ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@paroxysm6437 Lol look at this cultist.

    • @dougselby7592
      @dougselby7592 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@paroxysm6437 Clearly they have considered it, but equally clearly they haven't yet found the solution to this unexpected reduction in clumpyness, or to the Hubble tension either.
      We have the MOND folk questioning gravity without much success, people postulating fifth forces various, we have galaxies that matured too early, dark matter that cannot be found and dark energy that apparently varies inexplicably. There have to be surprises somewhere, because our current knowledge is incomplete, and apparently contradictory.
      I'm just making a guess, just a feeling and I make no observational or modelled claims, that it is in the electromagnetic force that we will find the surprise, perhaps in the nature of it's split from the weak force. Guessing based on feelings is obviously not science, but then how much science do you expect to find in the TH-cam comments?

    • @ArmchairMagpie
      @ArmchairMagpie ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@dougselby7592 The difference is that many people harping on electromagnetism as a major force are coming from one direction that has little to do with science, they want to fit the evidence around their theory and not vice versa. There is literally nobody there saying electromagnetism does not play a role at all, but to what extent it does is unclear. Certain followers of various pseudoscience factions, however, finally want to see their beloved electromagnetism playing that major role it deserves in their eyes. The researchers clearly say that dark matter doesn't explain all of it, which concedes to people accusing them constantly of bias towards dark matter, but that isn't a carte blanche for injecting another bias.

    • @dougselby7592
      @dougselby7592 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@ArmchairMagpie Yes, you're quite right. The "Electric Universe" folks are quite accurately described by another commenter in this thread as "kooky".
      They're a bit similar to the Ancient Atlantis types, but then there's a kernel of truth even in that, a hidden surprise quite dissimilar to their literal claims that the ancients were more advanced than we are now, but something.

  • @JamesKuffner-cg2pv
    @JamesKuffner-cg2pv ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I'm stupid and even I know what's causing expansion and the fact that it's speeding up. Just think of an embryo, kind of getting ready to go pop than all of a sudden boom, or whaaaa, if you are an actual baby, and there you go, growing and expanding at a rapid rate but gradually slows getting closer to maturity. Not that different except on a bit of a bigger scale. Oh well, I had a go. Cheers Aussie James.

  • @the80hdgaming
    @the80hdgaming ปีที่แล้ว +78

    It's a great time to be alive to witness all the scientific discoveries that seem to come at us daily... And to have Anton here to bring attention to and explain all these discoveries to us... Anton is the penultimate Wonderful Person...

    • @SlickWillHermsted
      @SlickWillHermsted ปีที่แล้ว +3

      My life would be decidedly worse without Anton, in this regard,

    • @pkendlers
      @pkendlers ปีที่แล้ว +3

      He sure is!

    • @metatechnologist
      @metatechnologist ปีที่แล้ว +5

      The more we discover, the less we know?

    • @gwiyomikim5988
      @gwiyomikim5988 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      It’s truly amazing how humans have studied and explained our world from the smallest elementary particles to the edge of the universe. But as a species, we seem closer now to a “big bang” annihilation of our own making because we can’t figure out how to live together. But yes, Anton reduces my “tension” just by hearing his voice!

    • @sunaglarecrim
      @sunaglarecrim ปีที่แล้ว +4

      U mean second to none right?

  • @mark7s980
    @mark7s980 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    When clumpy burns out or collapses into itself it wouldn't look so clumpy anymore.

  • @jimcurtis9052
    @jimcurtis9052 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Wonderful as always Anton. Thank you. 😊

  • @canuckinsk
    @canuckinsk ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Our data collection has surpassed our models. We need a new Einstein to make a new one.

  • @OrdinaryCritic
    @OrdinaryCritic ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Among the four forces, it’s almost always only gravity and the two nuclear force that’s being taken into consideration…I wonder why the models seem incomplete. Are the simulations missing something? 🤔

    • @gerardvila4685
      @gerardvila4685 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      It seems very fishy to me that electromagnetic forces are not even considered (at least that's what I understood from Anton's remarks). I'm quite ready to believe that if you do all the calculations, the effect is negligeable... but you have to do the calculations first - i.e., include these phenomena in your model. I find it a little hard to believe that there is NO electromagnetic force acting on matter ANYWHERE AND AT ANY TIME in the history of the universe - which is the assumption that these modellers seem to be making, in my understanding. Happy to be corrected if need be.

    • @gravitonthongs1363
      @gravitonthongs1363 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It’s because our understanding of electromagnetism through QED is highly accurate. We completely understand electromagnetism and what it’s effects are capable of explaining. The other forces have much larger error bars and room for further undiscovered physics.

    • @OrdinaryCritic
      @OrdinaryCritic ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@gravitonthongs1363, it’s great to know that electromagnetism is settled science and nothing more can be discovered from it. This is why, even though I sometimes doubt, I catch and stop myself from questioning the science. We just have to trust it.

    • @secretchefcollective444
      @secretchefcollective444 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@OrdinaryCritic From what I can gather the attempt to add matter in (heating, cooling, emission etc.) is an attempt to add in these electromagnetic interactions - they do make the whole thing way more complicated and difficult to simulate so I don't think anyone could say the science is settled on this, regardless of how accurate QED is. Edited to add that it was only in the late 90s that Magnetars were confirmed as a large proportion of neutron stars so there is a lot of work here still.

    • @alexkid69
      @alexkid69 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@OrdinaryCritic If no one questioned science we will be a century behind what we have now. Most of the progress comes from people that questioned the established opinion. It's normal in academia to have professors stick to something that's wrong, just because they are afraid that it will undermine their lifelong work and/or prestige. Or from pure stubbornness, not wanting to accept someone's opinion.

  • @lakim3017
    @lakim3017 ปีที่แล้ว

    This guy rizzed up the algorithm real good

  • @mikewhitfield2994
    @mikewhitfield2994 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    It’s the human condition - the more one learns about any subject, the more one understands that we understand nothing about that subject. That’s why I try not to know too much about anything. 😺 On a related note, very impressive that you can intelligently converse about so many highly complicated subjects.

  • @nigelcnash
    @nigelcnash ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Without a grasp on how gravity and mass work at the quantum level how can we hope to understand it at the cosmological level?

  • @matusknives
    @matusknives ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Dark energy is yet to be discovered. It is only a concept that is used to explain existing observations. A bit like the prediction of neutrino way before it was directly observed.

    • @douglaswilkinson5700
      @douglaswilkinson5700 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Ah, someone who understands. Dark energy is "an observable effect for which a cause has not yet been found."

  • @itninja9503
    @itninja9503 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What if Time is not constant... When we look back in time at stars many light years away, time was just faster. But now that our seconds are slower, looking at that old data instead it looks like space expansion is just speeding up.
    That is why it's the 'acceleration' looks uniform in every direction as no matter where across the universe you the time is faster when the light from that star was emitted 100 million years ago.

  • @Sausage-3-ways
    @Sausage-3-ways ปีที่แล้ว +5

    This is a superb channel. Love it ❤

  • @mudfossiluniversity
    @mudfossiluniversity ปีที่แล้ว

    Dipole Electron Flood theory explains 100% of the Universe and it is all Biological as well as dipoles. S8 tension is simply the muon neutrinos attracting the electron neutrinos in the MEDIUM (not vacuum) of space which is saturated with dust and light particles creating Quantum foam. I have experiments that show the muons and electron neutrinos doing fission and fusion using pulsed lasers.

  • @larslrs7234
    @larslrs7234 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    You can't separate expansion and gravity. You can always only experience and observe a combination of both.

    • @douglaswilkinson5700
      @douglaswilkinson5700 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Expansion is not happening within the galaxy because of gravity. Expansion is occurring in intergalactic space.

    • @jajupa78
      @jajupa78 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@douglaswilkinson5700 expanding into what tho?

    • @thedevereauxbunch
      @thedevereauxbunch ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jajupa78 get back in line. One unanswerable mystery at a time please

    • @larslrs7234
      @larslrs7234 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@douglaswilkinson5700 have you ever heard the sentence that one day, an accelerated expansion might rip planets and even atoms apart? I think that expansion is happening everywhere. It's just very "weak" on short distances.
      You can't observe gravity inside an atom either. But you wouldn't say that gravity does not exist inside an atom.
      On small scales, we can't even observe gravity between atoms and molecules. Yet, planets can hold atmospheres.
      Same with expansion: it doesn't suddenly appear at a specific distance. We just can't observe it separately from other forces at small scales.

    • @douglaswilkinson5700
      @douglaswilkinson5700 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jajupa78 Space is not expanding into anything. It's creating space as it expands.

  • @MCsCreations
    @MCsCreations ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Fascinating stuff indeed.

  • @WTH1812
    @WTH1812 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    As Anton spoke, I felt the Universe pulling away from me.
    Was it something I said?

    • @garyfrancis6193
      @garyfrancis6193 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yes. We didn’t want to tell you. In fact it’s accelerating.

    • @yggdrasil4986
      @yggdrasil4986 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sorry, I pulled away because I didn’t want to get pregnant.

    • @WTH1812
      @WTH1812 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@yggdrasil4986 ... We never just talk anymore... tell me, are you seeing another Universe?

  • @andycordy5190
    @andycordy5190 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What if our basic assumptions about the cosmic microwave background are wrong? What if, instead of the first light in the universe, it is light from what was there before what we know as the universe we experience? Or maybe CMB is not anything at all to do with matter distribution, it being a representation of energy.

  • @parkerstroh6586
    @parkerstroh6586 ปีที่แล้ว +38

    These aren't problems, these are the unsolved questions keeping physists employed!

    • @oberonpanopticon
      @oberonpanopticon ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I wonder what people with that kind of curiosity will do after we’ve solved every problem in physics (if that’s possible).
      I like to imagine that they’ll try to find a second, equally consistent but totally different theory of everything. Jump forward by a billion years and our most far flung descendants are passing their time by seeing who can find a new theory of everything the fastest.
      There’s probably only one solution that explains the universe (or perhaps none at all), but it’s still fun to think about.

    • @whattheflyingfuck...
      @whattheflyingfuck... ปีที่แล้ว

      it proves they are not worth the money and respect they get
      if I as an architect would deliver such faulty work over and over I would be broke, but sure shove billions of dollars up their faulty equation delivering ass*s!!

    • @supremeintrovert7404
      @supremeintrovert7404 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@oberonpanopticonright... If humans even exist long enough to find out before the sun blows up!

    • @oberonpanopticon
      @oberonpanopticon ปีที่แล้ว

      @@supremeintrovert7404 If we survive the next 1000 years, our descendants will probably survive the next 100,000,000,000,000. But yea. Here’s hoping we keep up our track record of miraculously avoiding blowing ourselves up despite incredible odds against it.

    • @mr-x7689
      @mr-x7689 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@supremeintrovert7404 Our star can't blow up. It dosen't have enough matter. For a star to be able to go super nova, it have to be about 8 times bigger than our star. when It comes to our star, it will expand then shrink in to a iron dwarf... given enough time, and nothing ellse happens to our star system. But this will happen on a unimaginably long time scale. Our star is still considered a werry young child if we would compare it to the length of a human life.

  • @jamesmartin9401
    @jamesmartin9401 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I hate that I have thoughts but not the math to even begin to express them usefully. I'd love to be able to test them, be right or wrong or inconclusive.

  • @zrebbesh
    @zrebbesh ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Imagine that we inhabit the surface of a bubble. We infer properties about surface tension, air, water, etc, and we develop theories that tell us bubbles should be perfectly spherical. But we observe our bubble, and we find traces that it's slightly non-spherical, and that its roundness has changed over time. At some point we have to start thinking that maybe the water we're in, isn't uniform. There are currents. There are drags. There may be things the water is flowing around. Perhaps there are fish.

  • @lvuyk2408
    @lvuyk2408 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The cold string black hole singulrity explosion is the origin of the early clumpiness and the string evaporation of the growing oscillating space frame vacuum. See Q.FFF MODEL.

  • @tims9434
    @tims9434 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    How on earth do you find the time to create a new video everyday Anton? You're such an inspirational person. I hope kids watch this channel and are aiming to get into this field of study too.

  • @imm2mthankgod616
    @imm2mthankgod616 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    When matter collects it is squeezing the space out of it causing a place of less space

  • @jamesohara4295
    @jamesohara4295 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The Universe only appears to be expanding. What if the Universe is the same size it always was and is in fact Bifurcating. Wouldn't the observable results look exactly the same.

  • @stenkarasin2091
    @stenkarasin2091 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    One thing seems certain, we have far more to learn, than we know.

  • @grayaj23
    @grayaj23 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    What I like about the Perimeter Institute is that they are looking at alternatives to cosmic inflation to explain the first fractional seconds of the universe. not that there's anything necessarily wrong with it, but it would be nice to have a model that's testable.

    • @ProducerX21
      @ProducerX21 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I loved watching Neil Turok call out Alan Guth on his inflation model on stage for not being testable. I don’t know who is right, but it nice to see someone question these models

    • @tomsharp1008
      @tomsharp1008 ปีที่แล้ว

      Alan guth himself has distanced himself from inflation as well. I don’t think it’s right but I don’t fully understand it well enough to give any alternative.

  • @jnhrtmn
    @jnhrtmn ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I cannot wait for the distance paradigm to fall apart. How long after that until the big bang is dropped? I will bet that it takes a long time.

  • @Dylan_ISA
    @Dylan_ISA ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I'm really curious, is there "stretching" while expanding? if so how would(if at all) that effect Time?

    • @douglaswilkinson5700
      @douglaswilkinson5700 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes. It's not space and time. It's spacetime. Mass curves spacetime so the time aspect is also affected. (cf Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity)

    • @atticuswalker8970
      @atticuswalker8970 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      time slows around mass causing it to stretch outwards. and maintain connected to the time beyond the influence. expansion is the collective effect of mass slowing time. attracting more mass along the path of least resistance.

    • @Dylan_ISA
      @Dylan_ISA ปีที่แล้ว

      @@atticuswalker8970 So early universe was less stretched? so time was different then compared to what we see now? could that effect growth in the early universe? maybe being so compact time moved very fast everywhere?

    • @atticuswalker8970
      @atticuswalker8970 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Dylan_ISA the early universe had more uniform mass with simular frequency of quantum interactions. as the mass gathered . the difference caused more stretch. the mass drawn in by the difference left the space it was in . so the time in that space wasn't slowed down. and the space it moved into . made the time in that space go slower .

    • @atticuswalker8970
      @atticuswalker8970 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Dylan_ISA the very early universe. before mass formed expanded faster than the current speed of light. then inflation stopped as soon as mass formed. and didn't start expanding until the mass started clumping together. creating the dilation in time pushing outward to keep the different time connected. drawing more mass into less resistant time for movement. that's why the expansion is acelerating as the mass collects. causing more difference. requiring more stretch.

  • @justinanderson267
    @justinanderson267 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    3:50
    I wish these were better, longer.
    I mean, usually they will have a computer simulation where stars move and bounce around swirling all over the screen...
    But how long is that? 1,000 years? 100,000 years? They never let it go on for billions. They never make stars explode and reform. It's really very inaccurate.

  • @jamesgabor9284
    @jamesgabor9284 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I believe at large scales new forces emerge that we simply can’t notice at our levels. Gravity is so much weaker than say electromagnetism, what if there is a gravity to gravity? Additional but extremely weak forces that only work at very, very large scales.

  • @wolver73
    @wolver73 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The giant turtle theory covers all of this.

  • @jackalovski1
    @jackalovski1 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    If I’m understanding this correctly, an increasing amount of “dark energy” would solve both tensions. I’ve long thought that “dark energy” was just light. We say that as the universe expands, light is stretched which lowers the energy of those photons, but what if it was the other way round and it’s the energy from those photons that stretches the universe apart? No one has ever been able to tell me how much of the energy in the universe is light. Also, as the universe evolves, isn’t more and more energy converted from matter into light?

  • @bakfixx
    @bakfixx ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The overlap of multiple Big-Bangs...

  • @mathedguy
    @mathedguy ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Your presentation of this model of universe-without-magnetism was interesting.

    • @Chris-iv3bc
      @Chris-iv3bc ปีที่แล้ว

      yeah they forgot the main ingredient. The electric force. And also they just made up a bunch others. As if time can be a 'thing'. MORONS

  • @Hman92
    @Hman92 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I hope I can be alive when all of this is figured out, with the exponential growth of our technology I think I may have a chance to see it.

  • @patryn36
    @patryn36 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    all these differences are there because the theories are based on distinct misconceptions starting with the idea that everything started out as a infinite dense point in space with no size.

    • @DrDeuteron
      @DrDeuteron ปีที่แล้ว +2

      The no size part is not part of the assumption

    • @patryn36
      @patryn36 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@DrDeuteron yes it is and it is part of the massive flaw of the supposed thinking.

    • @philippecoulonges4439
      @philippecoulonges4439 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@patryn36 No it is not, and there is no assumption as everyone agrees that it's out of field. We have a physic up to a limit, and no physic after that limit because it could lead to the assumption you're talking about... or something else.

    • @patryn36
      @patryn36 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@philippecoulonges4439 is that why general relativity breaks down once you pass the event horizon? Or why it fails to account for the stars' speed on the galactic outskirts? As for everyone agreeing, there is a term for that that perfectly describes a very good explanation for that: herd behavior. I can tell you why the hubble tension exists, they are not interpreting the data right for distances and speeds. As you look outwards, you look into the past so you see things as they were, that means things were moving faster in the past. Same for the clumping, things were closer together in the past so it makes sense they clumped more then they do now. I bet you and the rest still wonder where the antimatter is even though it is made in the sun, lightning strikes, a certain radioactive decay product, and the lhc. All those are made of normal matter and much lower energies than is supposed to generate antimatter out in space with gamma rays. The big bang was not a singularity, it was an object that exploded as a white hole and one day in our distant future the matter in the universe will most likely become that object again and repeat the process. Energy is the result of matter moving only, when any of you find an energy that does not have a particle in association then we can discuss what you all believe in a serious manner.

  • @smallpox6738
    @smallpox6738 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hypothetical... Universe consists of parallel temporal spatial membranes stacked on top of each other. Oversimplified version, each membrane is an XY grid with matter distributed on it. From one side of the universe to the other, imagine a spline that is using matter distribution as points close to this spline. The effect of matter on the curvature of the spline creates normals parallel to tangents along the curve. These tangents dictate the symmetry of forces on locales affecting mass/energy in the space of the next membrane. Membrane n-1 dictates it's tangent to Membrane n which the causes a change in that locale on membrane n, which in turn moves matter on membrane n. The spline locale remains the same temporarily from membrane n-1 to membrane n, but the normals are no long the same for each locale. This changes the symmetry of the forces again which can change forces acting on the matter at that locale. As matter density increases the spline should see a less erratic change in forces over time and could explain the great attractor too. Maybe dark matter is just the net effect we see from parallel membranes. Not sure if you could call n-1 membrane the past and membrane n+1 the future. Cause-Effect-Retrocause. Also this may not violate conservation of energy as the over all sum of all energy on membranes is still conserved.

  • @Stroheim333
    @Stroheim333 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    It is time for astronomers and physics to admit that their model of the universe is in shambles. They need a fundamentally new model, like GR replaced Newton, and not only try to fit every new anomaly in it with ad hoch theories and assumptions on top of other ad hoch theories.

    • @blokin5039
      @blokin5039 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      No it's time you stop blindly speculating.

    • @Stroheim333
      @Stroheim333 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@blokin5039 It is time for a prejudiced blabber like you to stop blabbering nonsense.

    • @j.f.fisher5318
      @j.f.fisher5318 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Naw it works great. There's some areas of tension but they are all issues with our understanding of the early universe. And our understanding of the early universe has no impact on any practical matter, so there's no harm in keeping calm and learning more. And the early universe is the part of physics we know the least about so it makes sense to keep studying those ares. Rushing to conclusions is incredibly premature. If something needs to be fixed a fix will be found, but for now there's no reason to start over.

    • @Stroheim333
      @Stroheim333 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@j.f.fisher5318 And I say no, you are simply wrong, and it is very easy to perceive. And you can't expect GR to hold water in all respects, or predict exactly every phenomenon correct, once we finally reach a GUT and TOE. That is also very easy to understand. Trolls like the "commentator" above deny it, of course.

    • @douglaswilkinson5700
      @douglaswilkinson5700 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@blokin5039Spot-on!

  • @Nefertiti0403
    @Nefertiti0403 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    That’s what makes astronomy so Awesome

    • @douglaswilkinson5700
      @douglaswilkinson5700 ปีที่แล้ว

      It's actually astrophysics. When astronomers encounter something new they ask astrophysicists to figure it out.

  • @osmosisjones4912
    @osmosisjones4912 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Technically its opinion that dust bunnies look like bunnies. They could be anything like how people see diffy things in clouds . But if random shaped dust bunnies and clouds form some round and random movements and collisions became predictable orbits of stufv form from dust bunnies around predictable bigger rounders things formed from clouds. Wouldn't that violate entropy. Going from discord to order. Then again in retrospect retrospect itself violates entropy

    • @dananorth895
      @dananorth895 ปีที่แล้ว

      If the universe started off with a wabbit (or rwo) then it would make sense there should be some comological trace left over time. Dust bunnies are our undeniable proof. Both in the cosmos and under the sofa.

    • @j.f.fisher5318
      @j.f.fisher5318 ปีที่แล้ว

      Gravity attracts things. Things being separate creates potential energy, reducing entropy. Things coming together reduce potential energy and increase entropy. Same with electrostatic forces that make small things stick together like dust bunnies and the particles that cling to the fibers of N95 masks.

  • @LunchBokth
    @LunchBokth ปีที่แล้ว

    I love your videos. Thank you so much for making this content

  • @marknovak6498
    @marknovak6498 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I propose yet another factor to explain the discrepancy in the Universe. I call it "Dark Mark". It explains it all, just give me some time to ... Nevemind. this was so much food for thought in this video.

  • @DavidCodyPeppers.
    @DavidCodyPeppers. ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I used a super computer to solve the problem of homelessness.
    Hal9000's response: give them homes.
    Who knew.
    Peace!
    \o/

  • @imm2mthankgod616
    @imm2mthankgod616 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Its funny how you did not mention how the outer universe maybe a place where the inner universe is falling into
    In other words a much larger gravity in the outer compared to the inner

  • @philochristos
    @philochristos ปีที่แล้ว +1

    That's interesting. I wonder what it is that we don't know.

  • @chet4562
    @chet4562 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I think a further study of potential Higgs field variations near and in black holes could be of (mathematical) interest to all the strange things we observe. There one could look into energy interactions with this field (related also to dark matter and another dimension?). Cheers, and thanks for great videos!👍🌟🙂

  • @Misterscout
    @Misterscout ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Our universe was created by a reality shift from 2nd to 3rd. Think of a two dimensional plane coated with gunpowder and lit at a single point. As it "burned" and spreads, reality changed and so did the matter. Equal distribution of matter conversion, but the density (surface area) becomes greater over time exponentially.
    Think of an expanding box and have energy bounce around. Eventually it's so large the matter converted doesn't interact as efficiently, but if you look back in time, things will be more dense.

  • @cautiousoptimist
    @cautiousoptimist ปีที่แล้ว +8

    If one were to "imagine/assume" a much larger Universe (and subsequently, much older), populated at roughly the same density as our current observable Hubble bubble, I am certain many of these cosmological inconsistencies would - disappear...

    • @oberonpanopticon
      @oberonpanopticon ปีที่แล้ว +2

      A shame that’d create more problems than it’d solve.

    • @cautiousoptimist
      @cautiousoptimist ปีที่แล้ว

      @@oberonpanopticon Please elucidate...

  • @sophdog1678
    @sophdog1678 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I wish, in real life, when I can't figure something out, that holographically-generated random equations could surround me in a small cloud. It's kind of similar to how I wish real life had a musical soundtrack.

    • @mr-x7689
      @mr-x7689 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Real life doe have a musical soundtrack. You just dont hear it, as you havent learnt how to properly lissen.
      Not all music is played by instruments or people singing. Music is all around us, when alone on the ocean, or far out in the woods. or in the busseling streets, or a cramped office.
      All the sounds arround us, makes a song few can hear, as we teach ourselfe to "Ignore" it.
      Lots of people feel uncomfortable going out in to forests as they claim "It's to silent". They have not learnt how to lissen. Forsts are full of sounds and music for those who lissen.
      See it as Lissening to an entire lecture, but not have heard a single thing of what the person in question had said. Forests are full of sounds from the wind, the leafs, birds, and and other forest critters, the tapping and snapping of old drie branches and twigs. If you learn to lissen, you can realize we are cossounded by beutifull songs everywhere.

  • @sanjuansteve
    @sanjuansteve ปีที่แล้ว +2

    If the big bang was an explosion from a single point, we should see different rates of expansion depending on which direction we look because we are not in the center of the universe.

    • @Astro2024
      @Astro2024 ปีที่แล้ว

      The big bang is commonly understood to not be an explosion...

    • @sacredsteeler
      @sacredsteeler ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Don't repeat this to any of your cosmologically educated buddy's. Sorry but study a bit more

    • @j.f.fisher5318
      @j.f.fisher5318 ปีที่แล้ว

      We _are_ in the exact center of the universe though. Just like you are standing at the center of the earth's spherical surface. All those lines on the earth are just arbitrary conveniences - you are literally in the center of that surface with the same distance stretching away in every direction.
      Same with the universe, but it's 3D not 2D. Everything emerged together and is expanding together so everything is the center.

    • @sacredsteeler
      @sacredsteeler ปีที่แล้ว

      @BernieGore-fs2is ...against a well-meaning guy making a fool of himself at a party, sure.

    • @sacredsteeler
      @sacredsteeler ปีที่แล้ว

      @BernieGore-fs2is "You're"

  • @axle.australian.patriot
    @axle.australian.patriot ปีที่แล้ว

    0:05 I was waiting for the Tom Hanks -- "Houston, we have a problem." line lol

  • @Auroral_Anomaly
    @Auroral_Anomaly ปีที่แล้ว +3

    We can’t be entirely sure what the problem is, there’s just too many things to take into account that no supercomputer can handle.

  • @maxmusterman3371
    @maxmusterman3371 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Maybe we also dont understant the cmb as good as we think. Is there any simulation that takes current observations of the universe and simulates backwards in time?

  • @JaydragonM
    @JaydragonM ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What if dark matter was either less prevalent or less gravitationally attractive in the early universe?
    I actually believe dark matter to have a complex mass (meaning the mass has an imaginary element, or is exclusively imaginary).
    Dark matter is directly gravitationally attracted/repelled by other dark matter - but, dark matter would be pushed either clockwise or counter-clockwise by the force of gravity. That's why it forms halos.
    Dark matter probably took longer to clump up than regular matter did. So galaxies and clusters etc. wouldn't have as much mass as an equivalent galaxy/cluster/etc. would today.

  • @brown2889
    @brown2889 ปีที่แล้ว

    The clumping maybe simulates waves around many black holes. Go to your sink, fill it up, start draining it and stir once. Add some different color dye. Black hole.

  • @Alondro77
    @Alondro77 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hubble tension could simply be a consequence of how dark energy is generated (assuming it does actually exist). If it's produced by collections of matter, then as matter clumps, more dark energy will be produced in those locations and cause faster acceleration. The same is true if dark energy is a by-product of voids, with virtual particles more frequently appearing there in line with the 'nature abhors a vacuum' idea.
    As for this S8 problem, what would be consequence of the initial rapid inflation of the universe suddenly slowing down? And then, WHY DID IT SLOW DOWN IN THE FIRST PLACE? If spacetime inflation can vastly exceed the speed of light, what is the mechanism by which that inflation can slow? Should not the 'denser' spacetime in the early universe imply a difference in the force of gravity at that time, given gravity itself is proving to be nothing more than the 'denting' of spacetime by mass? There is much we do not have any explanation for, and perhaps that is due to us not truly understanding how the basic founding principles of the universe may have behaved when it was much smaller.

  • @garywinter6149
    @garywinter6149 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The more we find out, the less we know. I now know so much that I don't know anything at all. 😂😂

  • @strezztechnoid
    @strezztechnoid ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Until a sufficiently large spatial displacement experiment is constructed, and the parameters of such an experiment could be achievable but would still be suspect given our understanding of large system dynamics. Voids and displacements throughout the universe could exhibit behaviors not well understood. An idealized experiment might include two synchronized independent observers of a binary pair with the observers located orthogonal to one another.

  • @WildberryCrunch
    @WildberryCrunch ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I do not think I know what is going on, but I think there is a clear connection that seems to never be considered! What is more likely, that the whole universe at every point changed seemingly randomly regarding certain dynamics, or that something more local occurred which affects the way we see things far away/long ago relative to now? If the latter is true, what could have possibly happened locally that affects measurements even now? Well the only thing that seems satisfactory to consider is that around the same time we think these tensions start to happen comes relatively close to when the sun/solar system formed. What if it is important to consider that observing events that take place before the formation of this large spacetime altering star next door might be shifted in some way compared to events that take place afterwards. This is all just speculation of course but I have a feeling this plays a role I'm just too dumb to show how. Let me know what you think!

    • @Fido-vm9zi
      @Fido-vm9zi ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Your thoughts are amazing, actually! Pretty smart if you ask me!

  • @caejones2792
    @caejones2792 ปีที่แล้ว

    First obvious question: do these two tensions get along with each other? Do the apparent changes happen within a reasonable margin of error in terms of time/distance?
    If so, the next obvious thing is to identify the temmporal range, and study galaxies and clusters at the corresponding light-distance, for clues or whathaveyou.

  • @grantdixon230
    @grantdixon230 ปีที่แล้ว

    Every time more information is collected by increased observation, we find out just how ignorant we are. This has been true for every technological advance in this field.

  • @metalim
    @metalim ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I wonder when Anton will buy a proper lighting for the stage. Those ugly shadows tear my eyes

  • @PrivateGuest-so2qw
    @PrivateGuest-so2qw ปีที่แล้ว

    Electromagnetic repulsion from the jets being shot out from blackhole will give expansion look, while still giving some slight hint of gravitational anomaly of some kind. Perhaps these voids are charged gas clouds of some kind or another