Flux Gate Generator, Part 2
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 ก.ย. 2024
- ""My first video on the flux gate generator surprisingly became my most popular upload.
Unfortunately, it also led to some misconceptions, with a few viewers labeling it as a free energy scam. Due to this, I had to take the unpleasant step of reporting and removing comments that were rude and out of line. While I always respect differing opinions, abusive behavior on my channel is something I cannot tolerate.
This video is an effort to clarify things. I'm aware that skeptics and trolls are part of the journey, but for those who are truly unbiased and keen to learn, this video is especially for you."
![[TH] FS vs BME - VCT Ascension Pacific - Lower Bracket Final](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/wnygqsR2Fig/mqdefault.jpg)
Free energy design is not a scam. We only don't know how to do it yet.
Keep on the neat hard work.
I have been working on those principles for decades. Nice work. This is only one way to do it. There are more ways. Since you are asking if there are any other suggestions I have some of them. If you are interested of course.
Always interested bro!
This was overcome the the lorenz effect 24 phase motor, generators. Try making a generator that has the coils perpendicular to the magnetic field.
This is a genius light weight highly efficient dynamo.
Because the rotor is so light, no energy is lost in carrying the weight of the windings or the heavy magnetic material. Only the silicon iron laminations are rotated.
You must apply for patent immediately.
This will be the standard design in all energy production facilities.
Well done👏👏👏
Thanks for your kind words. But I think I need way more rpm. I have another design already build, and like 5 other things made to show but I'm way behind on videos. This gen is intriguing but I don't have enough time for sufficient testing.
@@redesign3dp don't show that on TH-cam.
Keep your secrets and develop in privacy. Make a comparative study with a classic permanent magnet dynamo of same specs but rotor has the winding ( same windings specs in the two dynamos). Rotate with the same motor input ( volt×amp) and measure the outcome of both.
I expect due to much lighter weight your design will get higher out put per energy in put in the motor.
I see, or I can just sell a kit with an assembly video and let people with more time and interest further study and develope. I never stay on the same topic for too long. ADD? Maybe. But if people like the designs and want to try i can make it accessible.
@@redesign3dp no. If you can prove your design is more efficient even by 1% than other designs you will be a billionaire. If it turns out to be less then you should work on it until it is more effectinet. Don't waste your brain and time on small things.
You need to sell thousands of the kit to make any reliable profit. Which wont be a reliable source for living well.
Focus on your points of strength and develop them: Very smart, hard worker, and devoted. Don't be like a talented footballer who plays only in the streets and let players with much less talents play in the premier league.
I see your point. But that only applies in a perfect world. Everything is so tightly controlled. Just look what happened to others like stan meyers, Edwin gray. Plus I'm not trying to get rich just want to provide high quality designs for people to experiment with and fund my future projects. I see lots of good experiments made crudely, but if they had a nice motor or gen platform they may be able make better discoveries. I appreciate your comments brother 🙏
It's not over unity but it's much greater efficiency. Nothing against the norms there. Just good engineering practice!
Yep, its interesting but not overunity.
هل يمكن تشكل المغناطيس متل العجين
Amazing video bro ! And great demonstration!
Thanks brother!
In the first video you repeatedly stated that the output was "higher than the input", while only pointing out the voltages.
I believe that is where most (if not all) of the misconceptions arose from.
In order to properly compare input to output you need a calibrated load on the output. And then simultaneously measure the voltage across the load and the current through it. Then those numbers can be compared against your power supply on the input.
I was indicating how, as I increased the input voltage, the gen output exponentially increased. Showing the voltage potential.
Also the voltmeter is output voltage and the amp meter is output as well.
I am all in favor of finding simpler and/or more efficient ways to generate electricity. That is absolutely what we need heading into the future.
I am trying to sound more constructive than critical. That said, you need to implement a more reliable and repeatable system to measure output power.
Yeah, I'm always rushing my videos cause I spend most of my time designing. I appreciate you input, and your totally right. I need to create a more scientific testing approach.
@redesign3dp well if you even need a graphic artist with 3D animation skills and a novice electrical engineer, im on board. Ive got nothing to do all day and have some very interesting contacts. I currently use blender and own a Mars pro 2 resin printer I worked with Nick Kallen on his new 3D software plasticity and I will be installing that program here within the next few months. It is by far the most exciting software to come out and I really need a good beginning project. I have a very solid portfolio to share.
Yeah, its always good to connect with someone with skills. I may need some animations in the future. Likewise I don't mind helping out if I can. Redesign3dp@gmail.com if you want to get ahold of me.
Коpy😂😂😂
Will await your next demonstration. There are always more ways than one to bell a belligerent cat.... Great work.... Thanks
Thanks 👍
Awesome device 👍. Ignore the negative comments, most people don't even belive that free energy is possible.
You've had a similar effect to Thane Heinz, have you seen his videos? He basically creates coils with high impedance which has a similar effect that you saw when you shorted your coils.
Thanks, I've been ignoring them. I know of the thane transformer. This is more like the Ecklin Brown generator.
Nice , very good!!!
Did you OK for give your plan, for testing your generator ?
I'm not sure what your asking. But what I share is free to experiment with.
What size generator would you need to power a family home? Or an office ? Does the power load, mean the generator size would have to increase ? Fascinating stuff… these are inventions that get people disappearing in strange ways though right ?
Its not a free energy device by a long shot. The more I test it I'm convinced its not ideal for large scale.
@@redesign3dp
Why is this model not perfect?? While the model is not affected by the loads... Was the resulting energy greater than the consumed energy?? What is the strength of the magnetic field of the magnet used in the model??
Great video as always! 👍
Thanks brother!
3.5 on the ammeter, and 3.7 on the voltmeter(highest I think I saw), nearly 13 watts out. For 65 ish watts in that's not too shabby! (40% efficient, once again assuming you're driving this with a fat brushed motor)
Also I have to correct my previous comment, somehow I managed to get myself off by a factor of ten should have been 1% and 2% efficient... Probably was feeling that was unreasonably low.
for the power input to your driving motor dropping while the generator's output is under load, the power drops by about 30 watts, from the 90's to the 60's. This is rather close to the expected power input needed to get the kind of power output we're seeing out of the generator. (a 32 watts) This would imply to me that when unloaded the generator acts like some kind of eddy brake. Under full load the coils reduce the rate of field change and therefore reduce the eddy currents generated in the rotor and stator. (implying that the driving motor's unloaded power is near 30 watts, actually this is a good question, what is the driving motor's power draw when not connected to anything?)
I would suggest trying thinner plates in the stator to see if there's an improvement. (though that seems like a huge pain, chop up some microwave transformers for a new version perhaps?) That would probably significantly increase your efficiency as well since I believe that there should be a significant amount of loss even under load. Improving this significantly would probably get you more normal generator responses as well.
Check what kind of switching frequency you're looking at before starting on a six lobe rotor since iron cores really don't like going over a kilohertz so your losses may run away on you (or it may just significantly under perform your expectations).
I still have to insulate each plate to reduce Eddie's. I already got a new design cut and delivered, just have to find time. There is still a lot of things to try. I appreciate your input and calculations.
Hello again,
Another great demonstration and it looks like you did try the bifilar coil arrangement as I last commented.
Very curious results, looking forward to the next video demonstration
Well done!!
Yes sir, thanks for your input.
Good share RD3DP !
Thanks
Interesting phenomena. what frequency are you getting from the output voltage of your generator?
I think it was over 200hz.
Good job. You have the knowledge to follow through and figure it out.
Thanks for continuing to watch my stuff!
I have an important question.. What is more efficient in generating electricity in this model when you use neodymium magnets or when you use coils?? .. What is the efficiency of the generator??
With increasing of speed the effect increases too. There is one principle that I have plan to put together for more than decade. Maybe you could build it. It's simple. I will make a drawings.
U can dowen to zero bakc emf.but not moving roter
Very interesting design. So if I understand right. This design lowers the drag / Back EMF on the motor driving the Gen, when a load is applied.? Which is a very good thing. Best of luck with this. Liked and shared.
Thank you kind sir!
Look the internet is nothing more than a bunch of nobody's who think they all have the smartest brains. Those who throw shade are not part of the future. Matter of fact they are why we are stuck in the present. They are not interested in forward momentum and absolutely do not understand experimentation. Lol. They make me laugh.
Great point, wish we could all come together. Obviously we all are interested in this stuff. I don't understand the in-fighting. But there are still plenty of great people out there! I'm talking to one..
This is your best best machine so far. It looks scalable and stackable. Great job.
Thanks, the next design is on its way!
I am super fascinated with your channel. Unfortunately, I don't know what is going on in this video. I am new to the hobby, so please forgive my ignorance. I guess you're comparing different motors, and your motor acts unexpectedly, but I can't tell what is expected and what is unexpected. What am I missing? Thank you for any help you can provide!
These are generators. The green one is how normal gens work, they bog down when you take off power, the flux gate does the opposite. No worries, I appreciate you coming back!
great demonstration
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤👍👍👍👍👍👍
The naysayers don't understand miss the point when you say you're not claiming overunity, the rest of us understand that you're steering the flux to a lower state of reluctance and that causes a fluctuation in the stator that gives the output coils a current and voltage.
Good work, you got another subscriber.
Thanks, and well said! Better than my explanation..thanks for the sub!
@@redesign3dp
You're welcome.
Open source?
Partially. I'll shared everything I learn about it. Since the the stators are lasercut cold rolled steel I'll offer reasonably priced hardware kits, stl files, or complete kits so people can assemble their own to experiment with. And hopefully share their results.
Well done Awesome explorations keep up the good work and Thank you for sharing❤.
No problem brother, thanks for watching!!
Amazing, 👀
👍
Do you want to go quantum? It’s a working progress, I’m just gathering information about it.
I've heard of quantum computing but I'm not sure what your asking?
@redesign3dp The Quantum releam, that's were the real deal into magnetic flux energy. It will defy the laws of thermodynamics, and the research is old (1965). Curious? There is a file I'm looking for that's a trade market secret, but I don't have full access to nasa docs. Im still looking.
@@redesign3dp this is a government site
ntrs.nasa.gov
My research is buried somewhere in here. It based on quantum mechanics nuclear magnetic resonance spin spin coupling. Although your flux machine is there too. Have fun digging through files.
Hello, what do you think of liberty engine project?
Looks sketchy
This is Flynn’s parallel flux path ! Thank show !
I just read about him, yeah its basically what he was doing too. Thanks 👍 😊
It is not, but is similar.