He brought his only son (himself) to kill his son (himself) to forgive man kind. Though me as a human I can think of other ways to forgive man and also to have people know I exist but God does.... well none of these things.
....8:23 mark....I am still waiting on..."Why am I a creationist" .....most videos like this should be re- titled..."My personal Christian testimony"......Christian testimonies are fine....just label them as such...
Me too! I didn't hear anything like an explanation for why he would disregard all the information and evidence written in the rock record. I don't object to people believing things on faith, if that's what they want to do. The New Testament insists on faith according to its own words. I don't know who decided that part of the required faith would be that the Earth is just thousands of years old. That seems to me like a bad idea. Believe what you want, but understand that it is NOT the story told in the geologic record.
It behooves us to understand why some people, like your high school teacher, Andrew, get 'turned off' by Truth; when some look at the church and see what so many have no eyes to see; that the church (yes, YOUR denomination and MINE) are an emperor claiming to be clothed, while running around town naked as a pharisaical 'hippie'. The Bible; the Word; Jesus never fail but especially those who claim to represent Christ today - let us be humbled and admit that we are morally decrepit like everyone else.
@@ozowen5961 to me it's more than proof. God wins! What you've learned, what you you know and what you teach is a lie. That must be a sad life. Explain me, how is that is possible then? A 300 mi years old fish with brain tissue inside???? I'm waiting skeptic man. Denying the truth makes you a denialist
@@Bazdavies1 how was it debunked? I've seen the trex and the triceratops horn and both are flexible. How can it be 65mil years old again? The debunking videos are damage control is all. I've seen them.
@@daniloarq you are denying reality. Its not actual soft tissue its the fossilized form of it. You cant extract dna from it Its not actually all squishy and soft like living brain tissue. Rapid burial(not global flood) allows on rare occasions for soft tissue to be fossilized under certain circumstances. Just because your teeny brain cant comprehend things doesnt mean god.
Unless you don't believe then well.. God is the worst being ever. So weird to show someone you are the good guy by making a place to be in agony for all of time. Though a true good guy could never make a place as such if he was the true good guy cause simply not believing in someone who never cares to show he exists.
Nonsense. It does not make any of 10,000 clues as to the age of the earth fit. It does not make the absence of a global flood fit. It does not make the age of the stars fit. It does not explain the fossil layers. It does not explain the global earth. It does not explain observed observation. It does not explain the wisdom of handwashing. It does not explain the failure of dove blood to cure leprosy.
"Creationism DOES make everything fit...." ...by using a shoehorn of epic and twisted proportions. to the point of it being a case of trying to cram a square peg in a round hole with a sledgehammer.
@Will Theaxe only certain geologic formations are made quickly. No one is denying that some are made catastrophically. But things like the white cliffs of dover are impossible in a short period of time
Not as unusual as you have been led to believe. If you are having issue on the science side, I recommend Darwin's black box. Written by an atheist, microbiologist that mocks and destroys evolutionary theory. The Bible is the beginning and end of truth in science and all else. If that is what you are really looking for that is were you will find it.
Here's a list of some PhD Creationist scientists alive today: Dr Paul Ackerman, Psychologist Dr E. Theo Agard, Medical Physics Dr James Allan, Geneticist Dr Steve Austin, Geologist Dr S.E. Aw, Biochemist Dr Geoff Barnard, Immunologist Dr Don Batten, Plant physiologist, tropical fruit expert Dr John Baumgardner, Electrical Engineering, Space Physicist, Geophysicist, expert in supercomputer modeling of plate tectonics Dr Jerry Bergman, Psychologist Dr Kimberly Berrine, Microbiology & Immunology Prof. Vladimir Betina, Microbiology, Biochemistry & Biology Dr Raymond G. Bohlin, Biologist Dr Markus Blietz, Astrophysicist Dr Andrew Bosanquet, Biology, Microbiology Edward A. Boudreaux, Theoretical Chemistry Dr David R. Boylan, Chemical Engineer Prof. Linn E. Carothers, Associate Professor of Statistics Dr Robert W. Carter, Zoology (Marine Biology and Genetics) Dr David Catchpoole, Plant Physiologist (read his testimony) Prof. Sung-Do Cha, Physics Dr Eugene F. Chaffin, Professor of Physics Dr Choong-Kuk Chang, Genetic Engineering Prof. Jeun-Sik Chang, Aeronautical Engineering Prof. Chung-Il Cho, Biology Education Dr John M. Cimbala, Mechanical Engineering Dr Tim Clarey, Geology, Paleontology Dr Harold Coffin, Palaeontologist Dr Bob Compton, DVM Dr Ken Cumming, Biologist Dr William M. Curtis III, Th.D., Th.M., M.S., Aeronautics & Nuclear Physics Dr Malcolm Cutchins, Aerospace Engineering Dr Lionel Dahmer, Analytical Chemist Dr Raymond V. Damadian, M.D., Pioneer of magnetic resonance imaging Dr Chris Darnbrough, Biochemist Dr Nancy M. Darrall, Botany Dr Bryan Dawson, Mathematics Dr Douglas Dean, Biological Chemistry Prof. Stephen W. Deckard, Assistant Professor of Education Dr David A. DeWitt, Biology, Biochemistry, Neuroscience Dr Don DeYoung, Astronomy, atmospheric physics, M.Div Dr Geoff Downes, Creationist Plant Physiologist Dr Ted Driggers, Operations research Dr Angel Duty, engineering Dr Chad Duty, Mechanical engineering Robert H. Eckel, Medical research Dr André Eggen, Geneticist Dr Dudley Eirich, Genetic engineering, polymer chemistry Dr Deborah (Debbie) Eisenhut, Medical missionary with SIM Dr Edward Elmer, Orthopedic surgery specialist (Harvard Medical School graduate) Prof. Dennis L. Englin, Professor of Geophysics Prof. Danny Faulkner, Astronomy Prof. Carl B. Fliermans, Professor of Biology Prof. Dwain L. Ford, Organic Chemistry Prof. Robert H. Franks, Associate Professor of Biology Dr Kenneth W. Funk, Organic Chemistry; biologically active peptide synthesis. Dr Samuel Gan, Biomedical scientist Dr Alan Galbraith, Watershed Science Dr Paul Giem, Medical Research Dr Maciej Giertych, Geneticist Dr Tim Gilmour, Electrical Engineer Dr Werner Gitt, Information Scientist Dr D.B. Gower, Biochemistry Dr Dianne Grocott, Psychiatrist Dr Stephen Grocott, Industrial Chemist Dr Donald Hamann, Food Scientist Dr Barry Harker, Philosopher Dr Charles W. Harrison, Applied Physicist, Electromagnetics Dr John Hartnett, Physicist and Cosmologist Dr Mark Harwood, Satellite Communications Dr Joe Havel, Botanist, Silviculturist, Ecophysiologist Dr George Hawke, Environmental Scientist Dr Margaret Helder, Science Editor, Botanist Dr Harold R. Henry, Engineer Dr Jonathan Henry, Astronomy Dr Joseph Henson, Entomologist Dr Robert A. Herrmann, Professor of Mathematics, US Naval Academy Dr Andrew Hodge, Head of the Cardiothoracic Surgical Service Dr Kelly Hollowell, Molecular and Cellular Pharmacologist Dr Ed Holroyd, III, Atmospheric Science Dr Bob Hosken, Biochemistry Dr George F. Howe, Botany Dr Neil Huber, Physical Anthropologist Dr Russell Humphreys, Physicist Dr James A. Huggins, Professor and Chair, Department of Biology Evan Jamieson, Hydrometallurgy George T. Javor, Biochemistry Dr Nathaniel Jeanson, Genetics Dr Pierre Jerlström, Creationist Molecular Biologist Dr Arthur Jones, Biology Dr Jonathan W. Jones, Plastic Surgeon Dr Raymond Jones, Agricultural Scientist Dr Felix Konotey-Ahulu, Physician, leading expert on sickle-cell anemia Prof. Leonid Korochkin, Molecular Biology Dr Valery Karpounin, Mathematical Sciences, Logics, Formal Logics Dr Dean Kenyon, Biology Prof. Gi-Tai Kim, Biology Prof. Harriet Kim, Biochemistry Prof. Jong-Bai Kim, Biochemistry Prof. Jung-Han Kim, Biochemistry Prof. Jung-Wook Kim, Environmental Science Prof. Kyoung-Rai Kim, Analytical Chemistry Prof. Kyoung-Tai Kim, Genetic Engineering Prof. Young-Gil Kim, Materials Science Prof. Young In Kim, Engineering Dr Vladimir F. Kondalenko, Cytology/Cell Pathology Dr Leonid Korochkin, M.D., Genetics, Molecular Biology, Neurobiology Dr John K.G. Kramer, Biochemistry Prof. Jin-Hyouk Kwon, Physics Prof. Myung-Sang Kwon, Immunology Dr John G. Leslie, Biochemistry, molecular biology, medicine, biblical archaeology Prof. Lane P. Lester, Biology, Genetics Dr Jason Lisle, Astrophysicist Dr Alan Love, Chemistry Dr Heinz Lycklama, Nuclear Physics Dr Ian Macreadie, Molecular Biology, Microbiology: Dr John Marcus, Molecular Biology Dr George Marshall, Ophthalmology Dr Jim Mason, Nuclear Physics Dr Ralph Matthews, Radiation Chemistry Dr John McEwan, Chemist Prof. Andy McIntosh, Combustion theory, aerodynamics Dr David Menton (1943-2021) Anatomist Dr Angela Meyer, Creationist Plant Physiologist Dr John Meyer, Physiologist Colin W. Mitchell, Geography Dr John N. Moore, Science Educator Dr John W. Moreland, Mechanical engineer and Dentist Dr John D. Morris, Geologist Dr Graeme Mortimer, Geologist Stanley A. Mumma, Architectural Engineering Prof. Hee-Choon No, Nuclear Engineering Dr Eric Norman, Biomedical researcher Prof. John Oller, Linguistics Prof. Chris D. Osborne, Assistant Professor of Biology Dr John Osgood, Medical Practitioner Dr David Pace, Organic Chemistry Dr Charles Pallaghy, Botanist Dr Gary E. Parker, Biologist, Cognate in Geology (Paleontology) Dr David Pennington, Plastic Surgeon Dr Georgia Purdom, Molecular Genetics Dr Albert E. Pye (1945-2012) iIvertebrate zoology, biotechnology, biological control Dr John Rankin, Cosmologist Dr A.S. Reece, M.D. Dr Jung-Goo Roe, Biology Dr David Rosevear, Chemist Dr Ariel A. Roth, Biology Dr John Sanford, Geneticist Dr Jonathan D. Sarfati, Physical chemist / spectroscopist Dr Ian Scott, Educator Dr Saami Shaibani, Forensic physicist Dr Young-Gi Shim, Chemistry Prof. Hyun-Kil Shin, Food Science Dr Mikhail Shulgin, Physics Dr Emil Silvestru, Geologist/karstologist Dr Roger Simpson, Engineer Dr E. Norbert Smith, Zoologist Dr Andrew Snelling, Geologist Prof. Man-Suk Song, Computer Science Dr Timothy G. Standish, Biology Prof. James Stark, Assistant Professor of Science Education Prof. Brian Stone, Engineer Dr Esther Su, Biochemistry Dr Stephen Taylor, Electrical Engineering Dr Brian Thomas, Paleobiochemistry Dr Ker C. Thomson, Geophysics Dr Michael Todhunter, Forest Genetics Dr Jeffrey Tomkins, Genetics Dr Lyudmila Tonkonog, Chemistry/Biochemistry Dr Royal Truman, Organic Chemist: Dr Larry Vardiman, Atmospheric Science Prof. Walter Veith, Zoologist Dr Tas Walker, Mechanical Engineer and Geologist Dr Jeremy Walter, Mechanical Engineer Dr Keith Wanser, Physicist Dr A.J. Monty White, Chemistry/Gas Kinetics Dr John Whitmore, Geologist/Paleontologist Dr Carl Wieland, Medical doctor Dr Lara Wieland, Medical doctor Dr Kurt Wise, Palaeontologist Dr Bryant Wood, Creationist Archaeologist Prof. Seoung-Hoon Yang, Physics Dr Thomas (Tong Y.) Yi, Ph.D., Creationist Aerospace & Mechanical Engineer Dr Ick-Dong Yoo, Genetics Dr Sung-Hee Yoon, Biology Dr Matthew Young, Mechanical Engineering, Robotics Dr Patrick Young, Chemist and Materials Scientist Prof. Keun Bae Yu, Geography Dr Henry Zuill, Biology
I find it strange that Andrew has dated rocks at 1.8 million years old but believes in a young earth. A bit of a paradox 6000 to 10,000 years or 1.8 million?
It IS strange... But I think you mean 1.8 billion years old, not million. 1.8 million years is "yesterday" on the geologic time scale. It falls within the Pleistocene.... the period of the current ongoing episode of glaciation, which involves multiple cycles of advance and retreat of continental glaciers, each cycle spanning 10s of thousands of years. You cannot understand the geologic history of the earth without understanding the geologic time scale. Earth's history is written into the rock record. It is a record of immensely greater detail and magnificence than ANYTHING written on paper. If you consider God to be the author of the geologic record, then you CANNOT fit this story into a span of just thousands of years. I'm sorry... but you make a mockery of God's creation (assuming you believe Earth to be God's creation) by misinterpreting the story of Earth's history written so magnificently into the rocks. The notion that the entire story took place in 6000 years is an absurdity. Keep your faith in God if it's important to you, but don't make a mockery of the story told in the rock record, which YOU have the capacity to discover by using your mind.
Maybe if someone could provide a single example of observable evidence that verified Old Earth Evolutionism over Young Earth Creationism, there wouldn't be so many PhD scientists who believe such ideas. You see, they understand the scientific method well enough to realize the ONLY difference between the two worldviews is philosophical. It's not a difference in scientific validity. The reason why you don't realize this, Prof Phil Bell, is due to the fact you adhere to the self-refuting philosophy of Scientism without awareness of it. It's the same reason why you're so dogmatically opposed to Flat Earth despite your completely inability to scientifically disprove it. Science does not mean blind faith in the current consensus of academia like a religious text. That's Scientism. Science doesn't mean blind faith in Naturalism or any philosophy or body of information. Science is a METHOD of discovery requiring no faith... including no blind faith in academia (or Naturalism) You're likely the type who thinks peer-review is actually a step in the scientific method. You do, don't you? It's a common symptom of Scientism.
It's interesting to hear of years of seemingly heavy indoctrination a faith. Similar to how we seem to view Islamic fundamentalist. I can understand the importance of faith, but can't understand how the change takes place. I thought this was going to describe the failures in geology resulting in the proof provided by the bible. Sadly, and understandably, neither took place to prove or disprove either. I am pleased for a man finding peace, I am concerned about the indoctrination!
The title may inform you why he spoke on his reason for his faith and creationist worldview. Now if you would like his take on geology and how it fits into God's Word, search for that and you will find.
I can’t believe I wasted my time here. His life story of incredulity in spite of his education and not a hint of an example of where science is wrong and the Bible is correct.
Hahahahhahahhahha please if I had a nickel every time I heard “the science” is settled I’d be a lot richer . I can hear your disdain in your comment please spare us your whining it wasted my time
@@thomasmanders255 what a non existing god? Things that arent real Im not scared of. You guys are the ones scared of reality aka the finality of death,
@@kmills1231 not frightened at all.. jesus played for m6 wrong doings and is taking me to heaven... to be with him.. take care and God bless.. i pray that you will see one day... every knee will bend before him..
Dripping sarcasm from those who do not believe that there is One who created. Proving Psalm 14:1. Your worldview is making you blind.... wake up, please.
"Dripping sarcasm from those who do not believe that there is One who created. Proving Psalm 14:1. Your worldview is making you blind.... wake up, please." Psalm 14:1 King James Version (KJV) 14 The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good. Thanks for pointing out some lies in the Bible. First of all, atheism is not an assertion that there is no God, but is rather a lack of belief in the existence of God or gods. Secondly, atheists are majorly over-represented among those of high intelligence and wisdom, including at Ivy League universities, so atheists are not typically fools. Thirdly, atheists make up only 0.1% of the American federal prison population, while the other 99.9% are theists, showing that the Bible is wrong yet again. Nothing in Psalm 14:1 is actually true. Notice how the Bible confuses foolishness for wisdom, and wisdom for foolishness.
Tell the truth! You are a Creationist because it is the easiest thing to believe and you don't have to twist and turn the truth and login into a pretzel to make all the evolution nonsense fit!
God said He made it all, the serpent says (and always says) 'Has God indeed said...?' Gen 3:1, NKJV, throwing doubt on God's Word, and Darwin says God didn't make it; it just popped into existence. Which one are you going to believe?
@@clivenaylor5392 His whole theory, published in 1859, which I'm sure you've read, leaves no room for God in creation. From the perspective of his Theory, isn't this his comment on God's creation, that it just created itself?
I am a Creationist, as in God created everything--however, the earth and universe are old. I feel like you are attempting to highjack the term 'Creationist' and apply it only to young earth creationists. You should be specifying what creationist you are. If I called you an evolutionist... you would likely disagree even though you believe in microevolution. Please qualify your terms brother. I am so tired of hearing double tounged langugae 'As a bible believer' etc. As in, if you disagree you are not a bible believer...
The Best Classical Music I'm not quite sure about that. According to the bible, and this is my personal opinion about it, so I don't know how strong my theory holds up, or if it even makes sense at all. Physics for light were different in the beginning. Because God Created light in an instant on the first day, it filled the complete universe at that moment, without light having a speed at all, and He made a distinction between light and darkness.so the first days and nights had nothing to do with the rotation of the earth or the sun. There were no stars at that time, those light sources came after the plants. Stars were added later and light got trapped in them so they became the source of light instead of God. We know light elektrons have a different behaviour when observed in the lab. So light is special and you can't put it in the uniformitarianism camp because of this. Light could have moved around the earth, because there was no sun. With lights weird behaviour, it's capable of doing such things. So on the 3rd day, light got trapped into the stars and they became the light sources, so light did not have to to travel at all to reach earth. This should be the moment where light became autonomous at it's speed got fixed.
Thank you for posting this, Dr Snelling is a real treasure!
Amen!!!!!!!!!! It is all about HIM! Thank you for your testimony!
Thank an imaginary man in the sky?
Inspiring Testimony! Praise God!
"God so loved the " world " .... " thank you ♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️
He brought his only son (himself) to kill his son (himself) to forgive man kind. Though me as a human I can think of other ways to forgive man and also to have people know I exist but God does.... well none of these things.
👁️✝️🛐👁️😠🌡️👣🌪️🌋🌫️🔥👀👂🙏🏻⏳, Thank You Dr Snelling
....8:23 mark....I am still waiting on..."Why am I a creationist" .....most videos like this should be re- titled..."My personal Christian testimony"......Christian testimonies are fine....just label them as such...
Here's why I am. genuinearticlex7.com/2020/08/12/god-of-evidence-evidence-that-the-bible-is-gods-word/
How about “Indoctrination Into The Creationist Cult”.
Me too! I didn't hear anything like an explanation for why he would disregard all the information and evidence written in the rock record.
I don't object to people believing things on faith, if that's what they want to do. The New Testament insists on faith according to its own words. I don't know who decided that part of the required faith would be that the Earth is just thousands of years old. That seems to me like a bad idea. Believe what you want, but understand that it is NOT the story told in the geologic record.
What got cut out of this testimony and why?
Still praise God for the fellowship and teaching at Belvoir St.
My favourite Aussie 👍
It behooves us to understand why some people, like your high school teacher, Andrew, get 'turned off' by Truth;
when some look at the church and see what so many have no eyes to see; that the church (yes, YOUR denomination and MINE)
are an emperor claiming to be clothed, while running around town naked as a pharisaical 'hippie'.
The Bible; the Word; Jesus never fail but especially those who claim to represent Christ today - let us be humbled and admit that we are morally decrepit like everyone else.
Soft tissue inside dino bones and horns is the proof we were waiting for, end of question! Evolucionism going down the drain. Sorry!
Soft tissue Debunked--Sorry!
@@ozowen5961 to me it's more than proof. God wins! What you've learned, what you you know and what you teach is a lie. That must be a sad life. Explain me, how is that is possible then? A 300 mi years old fish with brain tissue inside???? I'm waiting skeptic man. Denying the truth makes you a denialist
@@Bazdavies1 how was it debunked? I've seen the trex and the triceratops horn and both are flexible. How can it be 65mil years old again? The debunking videos are damage control is all. I've seen them.
soft tissue thing has been debunked a billion times
@@daniloarq you are denying reality. Its not actual soft tissue its the fossilized form of it. You cant extract dna from it Its not actually all squishy and soft like living brain tissue. Rapid burial(not global flood) allows on rare occasions for soft tissue to be fossilized under certain circumstances. Just because your teeny brain cant comprehend things doesnt mean god.
What about Dr Ariel Roth?
God is so good!
Unless you don't believe then well.. God is the worst being ever. So weird to show someone you are the good guy by making a place to be in agony for all of time. Though a true good guy could never make a place as such if he was the true good guy cause simply not believing in someone who never cares to show he exists.
"The good guy" does not equal God lol
Nice guys finish last. Same with Gods. Nice Gods finish last.
Testemunho muito bom
Creationism DOES make everything fit.
Nonsense. It does not make any of 10,000 clues as to the age of the earth fit. It does not make the absence of a global flood fit. It does not make the age of the stars fit. It does not explain the fossil layers. It does not explain the global earth. It does not explain observed observation. It does not explain the wisdom of handwashing. It does not explain the failure of dove blood to cure leprosy.
"Creationism DOES make everything fit...."
...by using a shoehorn of epic and twisted proportions.
to the point of it being a case of trying to cram a square peg in a round hole with a sledgehammer.
only if you ignore reality and just say god does creationism fit.
@Will Theaxe only certain geologic formations are made quickly. No one is denying that some are made catastrophically. But things like the white cliffs of dover are impossible in a short period of time
Why I'm a Creationist?
First 15 seconds: "I was born into a devout Christian family, regularly attending a strong bible believing church..."
just because someone was born into a Christian family,how does that prove that his beliefs arent true?
Soft tissue inside dino bones and horns is the proof we were waiting for, end of question! Evolucionism going down the drain. Sorry!
Indoctrinated since childhood and never get rid of it
@@arth188 hey atheist tell me smart guy, how life was originated on earth? Simple question man.
@@daniloarq i don't know
It's a very unusual combo, phd scientist and creationist. Maybe it works by compartmentalising the mind...Fascinating !
Not as unusual as you have been led to believe. If you are having issue on the science side, I recommend Darwin's black box. Written by an atheist, microbiologist that mocks and destroys evolutionary theory. The Bible is the beginning and end of truth in science and all else. If that is what you are really looking for that is were you will find it.
Here's a list of some PhD Creationist scientists alive today:
Dr Paul Ackerman, Psychologist
Dr E. Theo Agard, Medical Physics
Dr James Allan, Geneticist
Dr Steve Austin, Geologist
Dr S.E. Aw, Biochemist
Dr Geoff Barnard, Immunologist
Dr Don Batten, Plant physiologist, tropical fruit expert
Dr John Baumgardner, Electrical Engineering, Space Physicist, Geophysicist, expert in supercomputer modeling of plate tectonics
Dr Jerry Bergman, Psychologist
Dr Kimberly Berrine, Microbiology & Immunology
Prof. Vladimir Betina, Microbiology, Biochemistry & Biology
Dr Raymond G. Bohlin, Biologist
Dr Markus Blietz, Astrophysicist
Dr Andrew Bosanquet, Biology, Microbiology
Edward A. Boudreaux, Theoretical Chemistry
Dr David R. Boylan, Chemical Engineer
Prof. Linn E. Carothers, Associate Professor of Statistics
Dr Robert W. Carter, Zoology (Marine Biology and Genetics)
Dr David Catchpoole, Plant Physiologist (read his testimony)
Prof. Sung-Do Cha, Physics
Dr Eugene F. Chaffin, Professor of Physics
Dr Choong-Kuk Chang, Genetic Engineering
Prof. Jeun-Sik Chang, Aeronautical Engineering
Prof. Chung-Il Cho, Biology Education
Dr John M. Cimbala, Mechanical Engineering
Dr Tim Clarey, Geology, Paleontology
Dr Harold Coffin, Palaeontologist
Dr Bob Compton, DVM
Dr Ken Cumming, Biologist
Dr William M. Curtis III, Th.D., Th.M., M.S., Aeronautics & Nuclear Physics
Dr Malcolm Cutchins, Aerospace Engineering
Dr Lionel Dahmer, Analytical Chemist
Dr Raymond V. Damadian, M.D., Pioneer of magnetic resonance imaging
Dr Chris Darnbrough, Biochemist
Dr Nancy M. Darrall, Botany
Dr Bryan Dawson, Mathematics
Dr Douglas Dean, Biological Chemistry
Prof. Stephen W. Deckard, Assistant Professor of Education
Dr David A. DeWitt, Biology, Biochemistry, Neuroscience
Dr Don DeYoung, Astronomy, atmospheric physics, M.Div
Dr Geoff Downes, Creationist Plant Physiologist
Dr Ted Driggers, Operations research
Dr Angel Duty, engineering
Dr Chad Duty, Mechanical engineering
Robert H. Eckel, Medical research
Dr André Eggen, Geneticist
Dr Dudley Eirich, Genetic engineering, polymer chemistry
Dr Deborah (Debbie) Eisenhut, Medical missionary with SIM
Dr Edward Elmer, Orthopedic surgery specialist (Harvard Medical School graduate)
Prof. Dennis L. Englin, Professor of Geophysics
Prof. Danny Faulkner, Astronomy
Prof. Carl B. Fliermans, Professor of Biology
Prof. Dwain L. Ford, Organic Chemistry
Prof. Robert H. Franks, Associate Professor of Biology
Dr Kenneth W. Funk, Organic Chemistry; biologically active peptide synthesis.
Dr Samuel Gan, Biomedical scientist
Dr Alan Galbraith, Watershed Science
Dr Paul Giem, Medical Research
Dr Maciej Giertych, Geneticist
Dr Tim Gilmour, Electrical Engineer
Dr Werner Gitt, Information Scientist
Dr D.B. Gower, Biochemistry
Dr Dianne Grocott, Psychiatrist
Dr Stephen Grocott, Industrial Chemist
Dr Donald Hamann, Food Scientist
Dr Barry Harker, Philosopher
Dr Charles W. Harrison, Applied Physicist, Electromagnetics
Dr John Hartnett, Physicist and Cosmologist
Dr Mark Harwood, Satellite Communications
Dr Joe Havel, Botanist, Silviculturist, Ecophysiologist
Dr George Hawke, Environmental Scientist
Dr Margaret Helder, Science Editor, Botanist
Dr Harold R. Henry, Engineer
Dr Jonathan Henry, Astronomy
Dr Joseph Henson, Entomologist
Dr Robert A. Herrmann, Professor of Mathematics, US Naval Academy
Dr Andrew Hodge, Head of the Cardiothoracic Surgical Service
Dr Kelly Hollowell, Molecular and Cellular Pharmacologist
Dr Ed Holroyd, III, Atmospheric Science
Dr Bob Hosken, Biochemistry
Dr George F. Howe, Botany
Dr Neil Huber, Physical Anthropologist
Dr Russell Humphreys, Physicist
Dr James A. Huggins, Professor and Chair, Department of Biology
Evan Jamieson, Hydrometallurgy
George T. Javor, Biochemistry
Dr Nathaniel Jeanson, Genetics
Dr Pierre Jerlström, Creationist Molecular Biologist
Dr Arthur Jones, Biology
Dr Jonathan W. Jones, Plastic Surgeon
Dr Raymond Jones, Agricultural Scientist
Dr Felix Konotey-Ahulu, Physician, leading expert on sickle-cell anemia
Prof. Leonid Korochkin, Molecular Biology
Dr Valery Karpounin, Mathematical Sciences, Logics, Formal Logics
Dr Dean Kenyon, Biology
Prof. Gi-Tai Kim, Biology
Prof. Harriet Kim, Biochemistry
Prof. Jong-Bai Kim, Biochemistry
Prof. Jung-Han Kim, Biochemistry
Prof. Jung-Wook Kim, Environmental Science
Prof. Kyoung-Rai Kim, Analytical Chemistry
Prof. Kyoung-Tai Kim, Genetic Engineering
Prof. Young-Gil Kim, Materials Science
Prof. Young In Kim, Engineering
Dr Vladimir F. Kondalenko, Cytology/Cell Pathology
Dr Leonid Korochkin, M.D., Genetics, Molecular Biology, Neurobiology
Dr John K.G. Kramer, Biochemistry
Prof. Jin-Hyouk Kwon, Physics
Prof. Myung-Sang Kwon, Immunology
Dr John G. Leslie, Biochemistry, molecular biology, medicine, biblical archaeology
Prof. Lane P. Lester, Biology, Genetics
Dr Jason Lisle, Astrophysicist
Dr Alan Love, Chemistry
Dr Heinz Lycklama, Nuclear Physics
Dr Ian Macreadie, Molecular Biology, Microbiology:
Dr John Marcus, Molecular Biology
Dr George Marshall, Ophthalmology
Dr Jim Mason, Nuclear Physics
Dr Ralph Matthews, Radiation Chemistry
Dr John McEwan, Chemist
Prof. Andy McIntosh, Combustion theory, aerodynamics
Dr David Menton (1943-2021) Anatomist
Dr Angela Meyer, Creationist Plant Physiologist
Dr John Meyer, Physiologist
Colin W. Mitchell, Geography
Dr John N. Moore, Science Educator
Dr John W. Moreland, Mechanical engineer and Dentist
Dr John D. Morris, Geologist
Dr Graeme Mortimer, Geologist
Stanley A. Mumma, Architectural Engineering
Prof. Hee-Choon No, Nuclear Engineering
Dr Eric Norman, Biomedical researcher
Prof. John Oller, Linguistics
Prof. Chris D. Osborne, Assistant Professor of Biology
Dr John Osgood, Medical Practitioner
Dr David Pace, Organic Chemistry
Dr Charles Pallaghy, Botanist
Dr Gary E. Parker, Biologist, Cognate in Geology (Paleontology)
Dr David Pennington, Plastic Surgeon
Dr Georgia Purdom, Molecular Genetics
Dr Albert E. Pye (1945-2012) iIvertebrate zoology, biotechnology, biological control
Dr John Rankin, Cosmologist
Dr A.S. Reece, M.D.
Dr Jung-Goo Roe, Biology
Dr David Rosevear, Chemist
Dr Ariel A. Roth, Biology
Dr John Sanford, Geneticist
Dr Jonathan D. Sarfati, Physical chemist / spectroscopist
Dr Ian Scott, Educator
Dr Saami Shaibani, Forensic physicist
Dr Young-Gi Shim, Chemistry
Prof. Hyun-Kil Shin, Food Science
Dr Mikhail Shulgin, Physics
Dr Emil Silvestru, Geologist/karstologist
Dr Roger Simpson, Engineer
Dr E. Norbert Smith, Zoologist
Dr Andrew Snelling, Geologist
Prof. Man-Suk Song, Computer Science
Dr Timothy G. Standish, Biology
Prof. James Stark, Assistant Professor of Science Education
Prof. Brian Stone, Engineer
Dr Esther Su, Biochemistry
Dr Stephen Taylor, Electrical Engineering
Dr Brian Thomas, Paleobiochemistry
Dr Ker C. Thomson, Geophysics
Dr Michael Todhunter, Forest Genetics
Dr Jeffrey Tomkins, Genetics
Dr Lyudmila Tonkonog, Chemistry/Biochemistry
Dr Royal Truman, Organic Chemist:
Dr Larry Vardiman, Atmospheric Science
Prof. Walter Veith, Zoologist
Dr Tas Walker, Mechanical Engineer and Geologist
Dr Jeremy Walter, Mechanical Engineer
Dr Keith Wanser, Physicist
Dr A.J. Monty White, Chemistry/Gas Kinetics
Dr John Whitmore, Geologist/Paleontologist
Dr Carl Wieland, Medical doctor
Dr Lara Wieland, Medical doctor
Dr Kurt Wise, Palaeontologist
Dr Bryant Wood, Creationist Archaeologist
Prof. Seoung-Hoon Yang, Physics
Dr Thomas (Tong Y.) Yi, Ph.D., Creationist Aerospace & Mechanical Engineer
Dr Ick-Dong Yoo, Genetics
Dr Sung-Hee Yoon, Biology
Dr Matthew Young, Mechanical Engineering, Robotics
Dr Patrick Young, Chemist and Materials Scientist
Prof. Keun Bae Yu, Geography
Dr Henry Zuill, Biology
I find it strange that Andrew has dated rocks at 1.8 million years old but believes in a young earth. A bit of a paradox 6000 to 10,000 years or 1.8 million?
Because he find the dating methods unreliable it is showing inconsistencies
If you stood on a scale, which you know to be inaccurate, and it said you weigh millions of pounds would you believe it?
Also mentions negative million years. Sounds like he thinks there are serious problems with radiometric dating in general
It IS strange... But I think you mean 1.8 billion years old, not million.
1.8 million years is "yesterday" on the geologic time scale. It falls within the Pleistocene.... the period of the current ongoing episode of glaciation, which involves multiple cycles of advance and retreat of continental glaciers, each cycle spanning 10s of thousands of years.
You cannot understand the geologic history of the earth without understanding the geologic time scale. Earth's history is written into the rock record. It is a record of immensely greater detail and magnificence than ANYTHING written on paper. If you consider God to be the author of the geologic record, then you CANNOT fit this story into a span of just thousands of years. I'm sorry... but you make a mockery of God's creation (assuming you believe Earth to be God's creation) by misinterpreting the story of Earth's history written so magnificently into the rocks.
The notion that the entire story took place in 6000 years is an absurdity. Keep your faith in God if it's important to you, but don't make a mockery of the story told in the rock record, which YOU have the capacity to discover by using your mind.
He decided to leave hundreds of years of science at the door. The Bible is different from the science so he chooses the Bible.
Maybe if someone could provide a single example of observable evidence that verified Old Earth Evolutionism over Young Earth Creationism, there wouldn't be so many PhD scientists who believe such ideas.
You see, they understand the scientific method well enough to realize the ONLY difference between the two worldviews is philosophical. It's not a difference in scientific validity.
The reason why you don't realize this, Prof Phil Bell, is due to the fact you adhere to the self-refuting philosophy of Scientism without awareness of it.
It's the same reason why you're so dogmatically opposed to Flat Earth despite your completely inability to scientifically disprove it.
Science does not mean blind faith in the current consensus of academia like a religious text. That's Scientism. Science doesn't mean blind faith in Naturalism or any philosophy or body of information.
Science is a METHOD of discovery requiring no faith... including no blind faith in academia (or Naturalism)
You're likely the type who thinks peer-review is actually a step in the scientific method. You do, don't you? It's a common symptom of Scientism.
It's interesting to hear of years of seemingly heavy indoctrination a faith. Similar to how we seem to view Islamic fundamentalist.
I can understand the importance of faith, but can't understand how the change takes place.
I thought this was going to describe the failures in geology resulting in the proof provided by the bible.
Sadly, and understandably, neither took place to prove or disprove either.
I am pleased for a man finding peace, I am concerned about the indoctrination!
The title may inform you why he spoke on his reason for his faith and creationist worldview. Now if you would like his take on geology and how it fits into God's Word, search for that and you will find.
@reeb9016 thank you for basically confirming my comment.
I can’t believe I wasted my time here. His life story of incredulity in spite of his education and not a hint of an example of where science is wrong and the Bible is correct.
And then you you wasted more time commenting about it. You should watch more videos.
Seek truth as God says, test all things. The truth will be revealed to you.
Hahahahhahahhahha please if I had a nickel every time I heard “the science” is settled I’d be a lot richer . I can hear your disdain in your comment please spare us your whining it wasted my time
@@asliketheson where is the science wrong. Let’s start with that.
@@profphilbell2075 no let’s start where the scripture isn’t . Scripture is finished written down . Science is what is changing .
Look at all the frightened atheists. Always a laugh while being very sad at the same time.
Frightened of what?
@@profphilbell2075 you will see
@@thomasmanders255 As will you once the space tourism becomes commonplace.
@@thomasmanders255 what a non existing god? Things that arent real Im not scared of. You guys are the ones scared of reality aka the finality of death,
@@kmills1231 not frightened at all.. jesus played for m6 wrong doings and is taking me to heaven... to be with him.. take care and God bless.. i pray that you will see one day... every knee will bend before him..
Dripping sarcasm from those who do not believe that there is One who created. Proving Psalm 14:1. Your worldview is making you blind.... wake up, please.
"Dripping sarcasm from those who do not believe that there is One who created. Proving Psalm 14:1. Your worldview is making you blind.... wake up, please."
Psalm 14:1 King James Version (KJV)
14 The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Thanks for pointing out some lies in the Bible. First of all, atheism is not an assertion that there is no God, but is rather a lack of belief in the existence of God or gods. Secondly, atheists are majorly over-represented among those of high intelligence and wisdom, including at Ivy League universities, so atheists are not typically fools. Thirdly, atheists make up only 0.1% of the American federal prison population, while the other 99.9% are theists, showing that the Bible is wrong yet again. Nothing in Psalm 14:1 is actually true. Notice how the Bible confuses foolishness for wisdom, and wisdom for foolishness.
Barb Wilson it is your worldview that is making you blind to the facts.
He even describes how he was indoctrinated
Tell the truth! You are a Creationist because it is the easiest thing to believe and you don't have to twist and turn the truth and login into a pretzel to make all the evolution nonsense fit!
Good video
Actually a waste of time.
God said He made it all, the serpent says (and always says) 'Has God indeed said...?' Gen 3:1, NKJV, throwing doubt on God's Word, and Darwin says God didn't make it; it just popped into existence. Which one are you going to believe?
Darwin dos not comment at all on how anything was created.
@@clivenaylor5392 His whole theory, published in 1859, which I'm sure you've read, leaves no room for God in creation. From the perspective of his Theory, isn't this his comment on God's creation, that it just created itself?
I am a Creationist, as in God created everything--however, the earth and universe are old. I feel like you are attempting to highjack the term 'Creationist' and apply it only to young earth creationists. You should be specifying what creationist you are. If I called you an evolutionist... you would likely disagree even though you believe in microevolution. Please qualify your terms brother. I am so tired of hearing double tounged langugae 'As a bible believer' etc. As in, if you disagree you are not a bible believer...
The Best Classical Music Hi, I'm a Christian as wel, what is your reason to believe the earth is old?
Hi Tim:
Probably the strongest evidence is creation itself. For example light.
You mean the age of the universe is determind by the speed of light?
It is measured by it. Much like a tape measure uses inches to tell you how large a table is, light speed tells us how old the universe is.
The Best Classical Music I'm not quite sure about that. According to the bible, and this is my personal opinion about it, so I don't know how strong my theory holds up, or if it even makes sense at all.
Physics for light were different in the beginning. Because God Created light in an instant on the first day, it filled the complete universe at that moment, without light having a speed at all, and He made a distinction between light and darkness.so the first days and nights had nothing to do with the rotation of the earth or the sun. There were no stars at that time, those light sources came after the plants. Stars were added later and light got trapped in them so they became the source of light instead of God.
We know light elektrons have a different behaviour when observed in the lab. So light is special and you can't put it in the uniformitarianism camp because of this. Light could have moved around the earth, because there was no sun. With lights weird behaviour, it's capable of doing such things.
So on the 3rd day, light got trapped into the stars and they became the light sources, so light did not have to to travel at all to reach earth. This should be the moment where light became autonomous at it's speed got fixed.
is ego analysis