Live Relay: Impella Supported High-Risk PCI of RCA/LAD/LCx w/ OCT Guidance for OA Use - 3/17/24

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 16 มี.ค. 2024
  • Case & Plan:
    63 years, Male
    Risk Factors include
    Controlled Hypertension
    Controlled Hyperlipidemia
    Uncontrolled IRDM
    SAQ-7 score: 45, Current Smoker
    Presented in 1/27/2024 with AWSTEMI @OSH with hypotension and EF 30%. Cath revealed extensive 3 V CAD, pt was optimized and referred for CABG: which was declined by the family after Heart team discussion.
    Pt has known low EF but no documented CAD in the past: on ACEI only. Recent echo revealed EF 30-37% with small LV thrombus and placed on warfarin.
    ASA, Warfarin, Carvidolol, Atorvastatin, Empagliflozin, Furosemide, Albuterol (intolerant tp Entresto)
    Cath @ OSH on 1/27/2024 revealed 3 V CAD, syntax score 35, LVEF 32% and STS risk score 5.2%. IABP was placed post Cath which was removed after 48hrs. Heart team discussion considered pt very high surgical risk and recommended high risk Protected PCI.

ความคิดเห็น • 6

  • @areenal-taie6836
    @areenal-taie6836 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great teaching case !
    Thanks Dr Sharma and Dr Kini

  • @Docsammy
    @Docsammy 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    If no indication for atherectomy, this wont need hemodynamic support..evident by no change in pulse pressure with inflations.

    • @SaminSharma-ol2kz
      @SaminSharma-ol2kz 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Agree that this case was borderline for the Impella use and favorable points are thrombotic LAD potential for slow flow, EDP 22mmHg and EF 32%.

  • @jwilson3985
    @jwilson3985 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Changing enrollment criteria is a problem I mentioned from the beginning. If the median EF is >30% the substrates will be too healthy to benefit from pLVAD. Sad to see. Should have been

    • @SaminSharma-ol2kz
      @SaminSharma-ol2kz 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I personally think that 35% LVEF criteria for Protect IV is ideal and then we can have sub analysis of

    • @jwilson3985
      @jwilson3985 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@SaminSharma-ol2kz sub analyses prove nothing and are purely hypothesis-generating so that’s not correct. The real “Samin” knows this :).