Land Law - Leases & Licences Part 1
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 9 ก.ย. 2024
- Land Law - Leases & Licences Part 1
Welcome to the Official Law Sessions TH-cam Channel. Subscribe NOW.
*THESE ARE LAW LECTURES TO SUPPORT AN ENGLISH COMMON LAW BASED LLB*
*****I DO NOT GIVE LEGAL ADVICE HERE!!!!!*********
DISCUSS ENGLISH COMMON LAW WITH US AT / lswjh
FOLLOW ON TIKTOK: @jenniferhousen
FOLLOW ON INSTAGRAM: @LawSessionsWithJenniferHousen
#######DM ONLY ON TIKTOK#########
Absolutely brilliant
Hi Jennifer, I don't know if you if you will read this but I just watched Easements. I have struggled with Easements a lot Thank you
Folks its not beer licence, that is Jennifer's dialect, I'm sure she means bare licence
I struggled with that one, so thank you!
An easement exists across my property it is 6 feet wide. The landowner that uses the easement drives vehicles that exceed 6 ft wide across the easement.
Can I build a structure to prevent vehicles larger then 6 ft from crossing the easement?
Thanks
WATCH THE FULL VIDEO...The Law Sessions website is now operational and you can view the full lecture at the site.
Well presented...very helpful
Thank You Ma
Your lecturer are always ironic and proffessional
very useful lecture, thank you for uploading it, could you post me the link for part 2 of this video please, thank you.
Please Ma. I want you to explain to me Ways a mortgagee can realize his security
Do you have presentation of manual on lease practice procedure?
Sorry probably a dumb question, but what country does lesson apply to. Thanks
+eleyaeshaffner Yeah I need to know if it's England's law, because I'm trying to repossess a commercial property of mine.
+eleyaeshaffner thanks but it's a complicated matter, as it stands I can't tell if me as a landlord gave a licence or a it's simply an agreement. I 95% sure it's not a lease.
simplyalif uk
Hello Ms Housen. Thanks for your very clear explanation on a part of a module in Law which students like myself find very complicated.
I have one question however: You stated that the courts had ruled in favor of Cobbe but I read that the court had rejected his claim that the company had estopped as
-no specific property right had been promised so it would not be unconscionable for Yeoman's to go back to go back on its promise
-they had not entered into a legally binding agreement
-and that Cobbe sought planning permission on a speculative basis
I realized that Thorner on the other hand had been in favor of the claimant.
Was Cobbe' claim rejected or accepted?
Thank you
Pls where is the other part? Very helpful. Looking everywhere for it
You are good Teacher Madame but , pls put and write PowerPoint in your side..while you discuss. Thank you Madame
Thank you for your kind feedback. The full lectures will be available from January 2, 2013 from the website. You will be able to subscribe and watch. Look out for the other lectures we will post.
Beer license?
Three views per video, directly affects dyslexic viewers and seems a little unfair. You might also find it falls outside the DDA as there appears no reasonable accommodation when proving a service in this regard.
would buy them if you allowed for more than 3 views