85 Tonne Kobelco SK850 Loading Trucks

แชร์
ฝัง

ความคิดเห็น • 18

  • @roberthuron9160
    @roberthuron9160 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    It's always great to see a full bucket operator,making the job look so easy! Lots of experience,and competence,and a very delicate touch,as the machine becomes an extension of his arm,and body 😳! Thank you,for the information!

    • @ianbermingham9047
      @ianbermingham9047 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Ah full bucket operator 😂,are you on drugs 🙄🙄

    • @roberthuron9160
      @roberthuron9160 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ianbermingham9047 No,that term is used to distinguish between an amateur,and a pro! If you noticed in the video,virtually every time that the op,while loading the trucks,he had a full bucket of material! And he loaded those trucks rapidly,with no lost motion! Basically,he had all his details laid out in his head,and was working in 3D,or better 4D,as his moves were plotted before hand! If you've observed heavy construction for any amount of time,you'd spot that type of operation! The reverse is true,too,but following the manuals,and common sense,prevents accidents and other mishaps! Thanks for your comment,but it pays,to pay attention! Thank you!

    • @MrPIEEYEDPIPER
      @MrPIEEYEDPIPER 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@roberthuron9160 it shows you've never operated an excavator.
      Loading over the rear is slow. More than once he's had to get the dump trucks to come back more.
      If he drops spoil off the sides he can't reach to pull it back in as he's working at full extension of his dipper arm.
      Experienced operators side load dump trucks for speed.

  • @Duvstep910
    @Duvstep910 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love the colors; the red counterweight with the blue anf highlighter yellow looks pretty smart

  • @toddgreenwell9568
    @toddgreenwell9568 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Awesome video smooth operator

  • @peterpehi8307
    @peterpehi8307 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice. Full. Buckets. 👍

  • @borneomachine1988
    @borneomachine1988 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Amazing excavator brother 👍

  • @khilengtampubolontampubolo9699
    @khilengtampubolontampubolo9699 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good job 👍
    Waching from Indonesia

  • @jonathandesselle4464
    @jonathandesselle4464 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    He's dam good
    Plus between trucks he cleaned work site to make it easier on trucks and stacked clean out for easy loading
    Some might say waist fuel and time but end of day its profit...trucks make faster in out time..barely and spills on loading..and faster loading bc dirt already loose...money sits on hauls trucks faster they move in out is profit profit profit

  • @charleyt4965
    @charleyt4965 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    there are windmills growing on the backfill! trees would be better!

  • @yammyharrone
    @yammyharrone 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hate bucket banging with a passion. Just rattle it as the load comes out ffs

  • @CHRIS-xm1do
    @CHRIS-xm1do 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why is he wasting fuel haymaking if he did it right in the first place he could load extra trucks.

  • @jeeperzcreeperzz
    @jeeperzcreeperzz 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Ton**

    • @AwesomeEarthmovers
      @AwesomeEarthmovers  2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      tonne is a metric, Ton is imperial

    • @jeeperzcreeperzz
      @jeeperzcreeperzz 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Metric is inferior to Imperial

    • @RiteshKumar-hq7eo
      @RiteshKumar-hq7eo 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Mere ko shikhana hai

    • @neilcrawford8303
      @neilcrawford8303 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jeeperzcreeperzz
      You say Metric is inferior to Imperial.
      Which TON are you referring to?
      A US-Canada (short) TON is 2,000 pounds, only 907.18Kg (0.907 Tonne)
      An Imperial (long) TON is 2,240 pounds, 1,016Kg (1.016 Tonne)
      So, which one is inferior and why, is it the spelling, the unit it's devised by. I'd say the Imperial is equal to metric as TON and Tonne are very similar in weight for general day to day use, unless you're designing a super tanker. The imperial TON is inferior when it comes to dividing it. It's easy to divide a 1,000kg, not so for 2,240 pounds. The US system is inferior to metric as it's about 93kg short of a metric tonne, yet being 2,000 pounds it's easy to divide like the metric system, but unlike the Imperial measure.
      So. You say Metric is inferior, please tell us all here why. What criteria are you basing your statement on?