Solo Horn the wonderful Roland Berger, apparently with nerves of steel and an embouchure to match. Kubelik gave him a very warm, appreciative smile afterwards
Waw! It's amazing. This performance should be recorded with the quality of technology record on nowadays. How I would like to be seated, live, listening to this performance.
This is tremendous - as a performance and as a historical document. Wonderful clarinet playing from the unmatched Alfred Boskovsky. I believe, however, that this is 1971 rather than the given date of 1980.
Yes! This is indeed a 1971 recording, rather than the given date of 1980 (I found the exact same recording in BiliBili - the Chinese equivalent to TH-cam - where at the end of the video it is credited to Unitel, mentioning 1971) It is very difficult to determine who is the "unmatched clarinetist: Alfred Boskovsky or Alfred Prinz, the latter was eventually younger than Boskovsky. And hornist Roland Berger was second-to-none!
@@gileador The principal clarinet here is definitely Alfred Boskovsky: he's clearly recognizable compared to photos of the Vienna Octet from the 1960s.
@@johnpeacock1469 Sure! Of course, it is Alfred Boskovsky; all that I wanted to say was that the other Alfred - namely Alfred Prinz, was also a HEAVY CALIBRE! I trust you will agree with me.
@@gileador There's no absolute right or wrong in appreciation of musicians, and we will all have different opinions. Of course the VPO has had many superb principal clarinets: Prinz, Schmidl, Taubl, and now Ottensamer & Schorn. But for me, Boskovsky was always in a different league. There's something about the clarity of his sound that I don't hear in any of the others.
Maestro conducts it in four, whereas Bruckner clearly indicates ALLEGRO with a marking of cut time in two. I don't expect any of you non-musicians to understand that.
Solo Horn the wonderful Roland Berger, apparently with nerves of steel and an embouchure to match. Kubelik gave him a very warm, appreciative smile afterwards
Kubelik is my favorite interpretor of the 4th. faster tempo and drive really works. he pushes it. so exciting
素晴らしいR・Berger‼︎
最高のホルン奏者でした♪
Waw! It's amazing. This performance should be recorded with the quality of technology record on nowadays. How I would like to be seated, live, listening to this performance.
Nothing like a well played Vienna horn
This is tremendous - as a performance and as a historical document. Wonderful clarinet playing from the unmatched Alfred Boskovsky. I believe, however, that this is 1971 rather than the given date of 1980.
Yes! This is indeed a 1971 recording, rather than the given date of 1980 (I found the exact same recording in BiliBili - the Chinese equivalent to TH-cam - where at the end of the video it is credited to Unitel, mentioning 1971) It is very difficult to determine who is the "unmatched clarinetist: Alfred Boskovsky or Alfred Prinz, the latter was eventually younger than Boskovsky. And hornist Roland Berger was second-to-none!
@@gileador The principal clarinet here is definitely Alfred Boskovsky: he's clearly recognizable compared to photos of the Vienna Octet from the 1960s.
@@johnpeacock1469 Sure! Of course, it is Alfred Boskovsky; all that I wanted to say was that the other Alfred - namely Alfred Prinz, was also a HEAVY CALIBRE! I trust you will agree with me.
@@gileador There's no absolute right or wrong in appreciation of musicians, and we will all have different opinions. Of course the VPO has had many superb principal clarinets: Prinz, Schmidl, Taubl, and now Ottensamer & Schorn. But for me, Boskovsky was always in a different league. There's something about the clarity of his sound that I don't hear in any of the others.
すごく気合いが入った演奏ですね。やはりク-べリックのライブは迫力があります。願わくばウィーンフィルとシュ-ベルトとブルックナーの交響曲全集がほしかった!
A+
If the final coda was together))
45:40
ヘッツェルのとなりは、ワルター•バリリで、後ろはキュッヒルですね😺
ヒューブナーもいます😊
01:03:37
You found what I came here for
that's one muddled bowing 2:03 for one second or two from a contrabass player🧐
Trumpet and trombones a bit too blatty and not sustained enough through the notes.
I like some of Bruckner's music, but I have to say I do not feel he is at his best in this symphony.
Maestro conducts it in four, whereas Bruckner clearly indicates ALLEGRO with a marking of cut time in two. I don't expect any of you non-musicians to understand that.
Allegro ma non troppo in this version, and Kubelik alternates between 4/4 and 2/2…but I don’t expect you to understand that ;)