@@Nico_AIRanking I really don’t mean to be unkind but videos like these can be misleading when taken at face value by people who don’t know any better. Expert SEOs use tests like single variable tests and peer review testing to determine what works and what doesn’t. Testing means they aren’t being Guesseos. Asking an LLM to act like an expert when its model hasn’t been trained on expert data is nothing more than playing fancy words games. Look at the types of responses you got from the first GPT, nothing more than generic advice, nothing specific about the url you entered. As for the keywords research, it is just listing the statistically most likely associated words. It’s playing a word game with you. It doesn’t have access to Google keyword planner to know which words are best to use, what the volume or difficulty might be. Then content writer, the GPT hasn’t scraped and analysed the SERP to understand the search intent, what the page type should be, how long the article should be, what entities should be used and where should they appear in the article etc. I understand that many SEOs don’t understand the importance of some of my criticisms of the GPTs but it’s seo advice like this that leads the uneducated to try and fail and believe that seo doesn’t work or an expert isn’t worth paying for.
Can you check the GPT 1: Solon the SEO SAGE ?
I can't access it.
Thank you for great tools
Thanks for letting me know! Should be all good now
How can it be an expert at seo when it doesn’t know how Google’s algorithms work?
How can anyone be an expert when no one really knows the algorithm. It's supposed to help and guide you.
@@Nico_AIRanking I really don’t mean to be unkind but videos like these can be misleading when taken at face value by people who don’t know any better.
Expert SEOs use tests like single variable tests and peer review testing to determine what works and what doesn’t. Testing means they aren’t being Guesseos.
Asking an LLM to act like an expert when its model hasn’t been trained on expert data is nothing more than playing fancy words games. Look at the types of responses you got from the first GPT, nothing more than generic advice, nothing specific about the url you entered.
As for the keywords research, it is just listing the statistically most likely associated words. It’s playing a word game with you. It doesn’t have access to Google keyword planner to know which words are best to use, what the volume or difficulty might be.
Then content writer, the GPT hasn’t scraped and analysed the SERP to understand the search intent, what the page type should be, how long the article should be, what entities should be used and where should they appear in the article etc.
I understand that many SEOs don’t understand the importance of some of my criticisms of the GPTs but it’s seo advice like this that leads the uneducated to try and fail and believe that seo doesn’t work or an expert isn’t worth paying for.