Considering how much work you put into these kinda sad to see the return in viewership. Gotta find a better stream to post them in I guess. Handy and well done tho'
No idea. But you put effort into these and they're not trash. A lot of the physics content out there is of poor quality but has the views to perpetuate itself into getting more views. Like a 15 minute screen cast trying to explain a 2 minute problem can hit 37k views with the right SEO and title. Dunno about you, maybe try to partner with a bigger educational youtube channel or put something into advertising. You're stuff is lovely and handy but your viewership is sooo tiny to what it should/can be.
Best example of this I've ever had: I was discussing a circle-packing problem for work, and naturally, pi was what every term had in common. Everybody brought pi to the party.
I really love your videos c: I'm taking AP physics this year and your content really helps me understand the lessons. Do you possibly have a centripetal motion video? That's what we are working on now.
I have my "Rotational Kinematics Review for AP Physics 1" www.flippingphysics.com/ap1-rotational-kinematics-review.html I am also working on a collaboration video about centripetal force which you can read the lecture notes for (see "lecture notes" link near the top): www.flippingphysics.com/collaborate-pendulum.html And I have many in-class lecture videos on the topic at www.flippingphysics.com/algebra.html Keep up the good work!
Just when I was about to hit the replay button, he asked him to do it again... That was fun. I'm sitting in front of my laptop for more than 5 hours and your video helped me understand the concept and made me laugh!! Thanks a lot!! P.S. I understood your joke before you disclosed it...
+Mitchell Zuberi Sorry, however, i don't understand your question. Please answer your question yourself by visiting my AP Physics 1 review webpage, www.flippingphysics.com/ap-physics-1-review.html, and my Algebra Based Physics webpage, www.flippingphysics.com/algebra.html
+Flipping Physics thanks ill take a look, i liked your one dimensional kinematics video that you referred me to, and it helped, I was just wondering if you had another for projectile motion specifically which is what I meant by 2 dimensional kinematics
The second example bothers me because it looks like you are adding a term with units of force to a term with units of energy. (mu * mg * cos(theta) + mgh). Assuming mu is representing the dimensionless coefficient of friction, g is the gravitational field strength, and h is height (You didn't actually specify what those variables are representing in this particular case, so there is a way to weasel out of it). Still, I don't think it's a good example to use here. You can't add Newtons + Joules. It doesn't make any sense. BTW I love your videos & I love using them in class. Sometimes I just have to clarify things like this after showing it to my students.
This video is massively hilarious!
+TheWarhammer wow, that's punny.
Considering how much work you put into these kinda sad to see the return in viewership. Gotta find a better stream to post them in I guess.
Handy and well done tho'
+UnbornAssassin7 Interesting. What better "stream" do you suggesting I post them in?
No idea. But you put effort into these and they're not trash. A lot of the physics content out there is of poor quality but has the views to perpetuate itself into getting more views. Like a 15 minute screen cast trying to explain a 2 minute problem can hit 37k views with the right SEO and title.
Dunno about you, maybe try to partner with a bigger educational youtube channel or put something into advertising. You're stuff is lovely and handy but your viewership is sooo tiny to what it should/can be.
Very well explained..I really admire your work..you deserve a whole lot viewers..you would get them one them..thanks for your videos
+Rahul Jha Someday...
2:21 It's like you read my mind
Best example of this I've ever had:
I was discussing a circle-packing problem for work, and naturally, pi was what every term had in common. Everybody brought pi to the party.
Everybody brought pi to the party almost makes sense. Well done!
I really love your videos c: I'm taking AP physics this year and your content really helps me understand the lessons. Do you possibly have a centripetal motion video? That's what we are working on now.
I have my "Rotational Kinematics Review for AP Physics 1" www.flippingphysics.com/ap1-rotational-kinematics-review.html
I am also working on a collaboration video about centripetal force which you can read the lecture notes for (see "lecture notes" link near the top): www.flippingphysics.com/collaborate-pendulum.html
And I have many in-class lecture videos on the topic at www.flippingphysics.com/algebra.html
Keep up the good work!
I need a one hour edition of that song. please someone do that
Best physics channel 👀
Thanks.
OMG you talk to your viewers, my physics teacher is going to "Flip"
That's punny.
This is my favorite physics video!
Just when I was about to hit the replay button, he asked him to do it again... That was fun. I'm sitting in front of my laptop for more than 5 hours and your video helped me understand the concept and made me laugh!! Thanks a lot!!
P.S. I understood your joke before you disclosed it...
Laughing and learning. I could not ask for more.
still a bop 9 years later 🔥🔥
you are awesome Bobby
You are kind.
Do you have a 2d kinematics video
+Mitchell Zuberi Do you mean in addition to my video which reviews all of the AP Physics 1 Kinematics topics? th-cam.com/video/8G1oc5Qq90U/w-d-xo.html
+Flipping Physics yes, i understand the kinematics in the first video but i wasn't sure on 2 dimensional kinematics
+Mitchell Zuberi Sorry, however, i don't understand your question. Please answer your question yourself by visiting my AP Physics 1 review webpage, www.flippingphysics.com/ap-physics-1-review.html, and my Algebra Based Physics webpage, www.flippingphysics.com/algebra.html
+Flipping Physics thanks ill take a look, i liked your one dimensional kinematics video that you referred me to, and it helped, I was just wondering if you had another for projectile motion specifically which is what I meant by 2 dimensional kinematics
+Mitchell Zuberi I have several videos about Projectile Motion. Here is the first: th-cam.com/video/GiiWsXtt5GE/w-d-xo.html
The second example bothers me because it looks like you are adding a term with units of force to a term with units of energy. (mu * mg * cos(theta) + mgh). Assuming mu is representing the dimensionless coefficient of friction, g is the gravitational field strength, and h is height (You didn't actually specify what those variables are representing in this particular case, so there is a way to weasel out of it). Still, I don't think it's a good example to use here. You can't add Newtons + Joules. It doesn't make any sense.
BTW I love your videos & I love using them in class. Sometimes I just have to clarify things like this after showing it to my students.
Valid point. That is a bummer. Wish I had noticed that 6 years ago when I made the video. 😬
isn't there something else that can and will be brought to the party or is mass the only thing that can and will be brought to the party?
We bring all sorts of variables to the party. Mass just happens to be the one that happens first and most often.
why don't u make a video in which u introduce another variable which can be brought to the party?
0:40
(relaxed funky synth music)
Dude you're supercool
Freaking genius
+josh thebestt thanks.
Everyone gets cancelled out because everyone *has mass*
Absolutely
Hilarious!
+Shoaib Rashdi Thanks. I tried to make what could be a really boring topic actually entertaining.
Hahahahahah
+Gholam Mustafa Ali 🙃
万恶之源