@@ItsMeT---426 did you see evidence of those documents? Smith did not have the taken away documents catalogued properly akin to mixing them on open tables and placing them in folders and boxes.
@@bigdougscommentary5719 True, but all of the rest concerned appointments for individuals that were already employed as US attorneys.....not private citizens like Jack Smith. Might want to mention that next time.
that's not true.. LOL!!! No one approved this special council, the FBI set this up!! They aren't allowed to set up special councils!! Thats why the judge ruled that way!! It was unconstitutional!!
Its nice to see intelligent comments countering the glaring flaws in this video. Clearly the individuals in this video either don't understand or they don't want to understand.
@lloydb4130 no, he won't. Jack Smith doesn't lose cases. Let's keep it 💯. He is 1 of the top lawyers in the 🌎. Not our country, the world. This is a text book easy case. Trump did it. It on tape. Jack just makes sure all the I s are dotted and ts are crossed. No mistakes.
@@howfine7726 doesn’t have to be, doesn’t have anything with the constitution only the president give the ok for the attorney general to appoint a special counsel!
@@user-db6ps7pb7d Per the US Constitution Article II, Section II, Clause II: the Congress may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments A special counsel is an "inferior officer". In all previous cases, either the President appointed or Congress requested the Attorney General appoint a special counsel. Garland had neither when he appointed Smith. Rep. Masse brought this up during a Congressional hearing as well. The last special counsel appointment expired with the case it was investigating and did not grant the Attorney General any authority to appoint a new one at will.
@@user-db6ps7pb7d Not according to Andy McCarthy who used to be attorney general I think that was his title. He is the one who brought attention to Jack Smith's illegal appointment.
Jack offs appeal will be turned down. Cannon is the only judge so far that has rulled following the law and using common sense so hats off to her. Wyda is a constitutional accountability president, really? She's obviously a mainsteam media liar. She's not mentioning the tampering with the documents by the FBI that was admitted to. The higher courts are gonna agree with her decision, its obvious she took the time and researched the law before making her decision.
LOL, no. She delayed, delayed, and delayed until a crooked and corrupt supreme court justice could write an opinion that wasn't even relevant to the case they were deciding that gave her a scapegoat to use. Republicans judges ignoring decades of precedent when it suits them.
Wydra is a legal clown All 93 US attorneys have to be appointed by the President and confirmed by the senate But a Special Counsel a de facto US attorney with more powers than the 93 does not??? Wydra also neglects to mention that there is no Special Counsel law on the books. The closest law expired 1999
@@newelllondon724 That's what you get if your career (i.e. Wydra's career) is mostly determined by sexual favours to superiors in stead of intellectual achievements. 🤷
@@Solargeek 😂 § 600.1 Grounds for appointing a Special Counsel. The Attorney General, or in cases in which the Attorney General is recused, the Acting Attorney General, will appoint a Special Counsel when he or she determines that criminal investigation of a person or matter is warranted and- (a) That investigation or prosecution of that person or matter by a United States Attorney's Office or litigating Division of the Department of Justice would present a conflict of interest for the Department or other extraordinary circumstances; and (b) That under the circumstances, it would be in the public interest to appoint an outside Special Counsel to assume responsibility for the matter.
Jack Smith is a member of the justice department and was working for the justice department at the world Court in the Hague boy you people really really are not educated at all
exactly! The signal was clear in the presidential immunity decision. Those of use able to traverse in and out of echo chambers can see it clear as day.
Exactly. I'm not sure what she meant by the law is with Smith. There are special council appointed but they are confirmed by the senate or they aren't involved in a federal government case
@@user-db6ps7pb7devery US attorney has to be appointed by the president and confirmed by the senate But a special counsel with far more powers does not?
@@newelllondon724 correct, special counsel get appointed in cases as requested by the president to the attorney general so no one can claim partisanship. This fact has been proven over and over again and upheld by the Supreme Court. Attorney Bill Barr appointed three special counsels if I remember correctly, Mueller, Durham, Weiss, Hur were all appointed by republican attorney generals.
lol..their parroting of the "unprecedented decision" pointing to appointments of other special council, all while ignoring the fact that each and every one of those appointments were with individuals who were already US attorneys.....not private citizens as Jack Smith is. Bunch of ignorant liars expecting everyone to believe them. Sad. Their others "options" are also ridiculous. None of them will ever happen and even if they did, it would be laughed out of court.
@snunya9399 jack smith isn't and hasn't been a private citizen in his career. This has been rehashed repeatedly and found to be legal. There is precedence from Nixon. The use of special counsels are to support impartiality and fair proceedings. And no not all have been US attorneys
@@bytemuncher1 Maybe a year. Smith is not only handling the classified documents case but the Jan 6 case. So you're have a split court issue between the 11th District Court of Appeals and the DC Circuit court. This will likely expedite it to SCOTUS if either of these courts disagree.
It’s not corruption it’s obstruction of justice. Trump stole those documents and then obstructed the investigation to get those documents back. There is tons of evidence against him, and one of trumps employees even publicly came out and spoke the truth about them moving boxes to hide them from investigators
Interesting she did not comment at all on how Jack Smith's selection for special counsel was different from other special counsel appointments. That's because she does not want to acknowledge that it was.
It's pretty clear that.Jack Smith did NOT have the constitutional authority to become a Special Counsel. He was pushed through by AG Merrick Garland, regardless of what the law says about the approval process for a Special Counsel. Garland has NO RESPECT for the law. Thank goodness he never went through the Senate investigation process for nomination to the SCOTUS. That is one of the few things I can give Mitch McConnell credit for.
It's not an outlier. Just a few days ago, Justice Thomas wrote a concurrence (correction, I previously said "dissent") specifically addressing this issue
It was not a descent. It was in conjunction with the ruling on presidential immunity does an unsolicited outlier and not warranted under Supreme Court rules.
Jack Smith's appointment was unconstitutional. In the Supreme Court's decision on presidential immunity, it was evident that the justices were notably skeptical about the manner in which Jack Smith was appointed. While his appeal was entirely predictable, it is unlikely to succeed in the long run. Although the case may continue to be contested, the decision will stand even if it ultimately requires intervention by the Supreme Court (which I think it may).
Says the guy with no credentials whatsoever or he would have bragged on them. Then the same tard (you) loosely cites the corrupt SCOTUS with at least two justices trying very hard to not be held criminally responsible for their own actions by keeping the former corrupt president immune from his actions. Basically, all criminal GOPs get a free pass. HARD NO!
@@user-db6ps7pb7d That's because it was a "warning shot across the bow," as the saying goes-one that Jack doesn't want to accept. It is highly unlikely that this would be included if it weren't important. The Supreme Court rules on as few specifics as possible; for example, in the presidential immunity decision, they said Trump may have immunity (contraray to what msm tell you) but did not make a definitive ruling on his case. Instead, they sent it back to a lower court for further consideration, outlining different categories of immunity that might apply.
There was an amicus brief to scotus an also one of the judges remark that jack smith is illegitimate and this woman is not revealing what she must know.
@@fred2903 yeah I am amazed that these shows put out so much info that a 2 second google search can debunk. He was never appointed and there were almost 100 other people Garland could have appointed and they would be legal. Why he chose Smith is a mystery.
The Judge raised objections to three points of special counsel that fundamentally need to be judicially, addressed… and finally laid to rest,… Senate confirmation, the oversight necessity, the funding source. These issues have hanging over the appointment of special counsel and putting its legitimacy into question. This “progressive” lawyer self-described on her own website as Progressive needs to stop making money on slyly misleading others… beauty and speaking craftily do not replace the truth, no matter no matter the professed level of competency.
@@Qingeaton yes Jack Smith did they already said that trump is paying people to be on his side judge canon is getting ready gifting from trump and judge Thames is to alone with the other two judges but it won't work because Jack Smith is going to win and judge cannon will be removed from trump case because judge canon knows trump did all what they said he did judge canon thinks trump is going back into the white house and by that he will give her a part she should have never been on the case any how she got into trouble the last time she tried to help trump she's another one of trump little boot licker but it getting ready to fall apart because they no that judge Thomas has been getting gifts and judge cannon also the both of them are gone another judge told judge canon not to take trump case but she didn't listen judge canon is in real big trouble but she doesn't no it because she didn't do her job 😍🤩
@@specialladyt Smith was a citizen, not an officer of the government. I don't know why they chose him, but he did not go through the processes that would have made it legal. Probably because they were in a rush to convict Trump of something....anything. The ruling may be overturned. I believe she has now finished the case, so no need to remove her. She's finished now. The 11th circuit may over rule her decision, and then the Supreme Court will over rule them, so Cannon will be proven to be right.
Thomas's advisory concurrence was an Easter Egg for Judge Cannon. Thomas might as well have been running Cannon by remote control. None of the precedent since the 1800's support her ruling.
exactly, but some people just don't want to accept it. If some how Jack wins the appeal (that may happen) ultimately it will go up to the supreme court who has already clearly voiced skepticism towards Jack's appointment in the recent presidential immunity decision. They will almost certainly rule against Jack.
More importantly the Presidential Records Act does not confer criminal jurisdiction. There are no criminal penalties for refusal to turn over presidential records. It is intended to be a civil proceeding. And it clearly supersedes all other laws pertaining to presidential records. Any document that is not a private document is a presidential record including classified documents.
Thomas ,alito , kavenaugh,barret, could we guess how they will vote, oh lets not forget ol clarence thomas, to say this court is compromised is an understatement.!
I appreciate the information given by the video. And like someone else say, we know how Clarence Thomas will vote. But the lady blinks so much that it's distracting. Watch her again.
Don't it means if they get the appeal and past the retail and would be going to have a different judge i believe that's true cause it would be the same when it went back to her
How many time did the feds ask him to return them ? How many times did he order his immigrant employees to hide them ? Did the feds have to get a warrant, and finally raid JB's garage again ? *ZERO* times. See the difference ? Didn't think so.......
It doesn't matter if it's constitutional or unconstitutional or if he has jurisdiction blah blah blah none of that matters because Jack Smith is about 6 months away from being unemployed
@@SlimPickins-lj7rd and everybody else right behind it I'm afraid. Nobody's getting the whole story on these news shows and everybody's blaming the other team and that's not the the whole truth is our biggest problem right now. We all think we know better and we don't know anything. Please approach the news like that when you consume. Nobody is telling everything
The Raid was unprecedented . Trump was in discussion and working to please the Document Archives bureaucrats even though he had no obligation to do so. The case was unprecedented . Jack Smith was not employed directly by the DOJ . It is to be Garland to file a protest.
![[TH] VALORANT Champions Seoul - Grand Final - EDG vs TH](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/WvObMc9VelI/mqdefault.jpg)
Give up the lawfare, it ain't working
The felon stole United States MILITARY documents.
@@ItsMeT---426 did you see evidence of those documents? Smith did not have the taken away documents catalogued properly akin to mixing them on open tables and placing them in folders and boxes.
@@mikewallace8087 Bother someone else with word salad KID.
@@ItsMeT---426 WOW that was POWERFUL . Try again Pip.
@@mikewallace8087 I can't decipher gibberish KlD
The special councils were upheld because they were approved and voted on by the House. BIG DIFFERENCE.
That ONLY covers some of the special cases.
Why are you putting that imbecile Spartz on the air? She is as airheaded as Boebert.
@@bigdougscommentary5719 True, but all of the rest concerned appointments for individuals that were already employed as US attorneys.....not private citizens like Jack Smith. Might want to mention that next time.
that's not true.. LOL!!! No one approved this special council, the FBI set this up!! They aren't allowed to set up special councils!! Thats why the judge ruled that way!! It was unconstitutional!!
@@bigdougscommentary5719 The only ones that were not requested by Congress were appointed by the President.
Its nice to see intelligent comments countering the glaring flaws in this video. Clearly the individuals in this video either don't understand or they don't want to understand.
Well said
but I thought they had him this time…. Ohhhh, next time, got it
this is all false and lies they will get theres
Theirs or there’s?
@@TKUA11 both
Is this like a veiled threat? It sure sounds like one.
@@wahyuindrasto8307 more like karma i'm 65 and that is what happens to ppl who lie
@@wahyuindrasto8307 Sounds like a threat of legal actions to me.
DOJ is not doing things buy the book to begin with
So delusional
Guarantee he had the appeals paperwork already done and ready to go. Jack knows.
@@doughughes5732 he's a 🤡
Yeah, he know jack shit.
He was not appointed a special counsel - no president no congress like all other special counsel in history -so how is he a special counsel?
Smith is just gonna take the "L"
@lloydb4130 no, he won't. Jack Smith doesn't lose cases. Let's keep it 💯. He is 1 of the top lawyers in the 🌎. Not our country, the world. This is a text book easy case. Trump did it. It on tape. Jack just makes sure all the I s are dotted and ts are crossed. No mistakes.
He is not constitutional appointed or president appointed or Congress appointed
@@howfine7726 doesn’t have to be, doesn’t have anything with the constitution only the president give the ok for the attorney general to appoint a special counsel!
@@user-db6ps7pb7d
Per the US Constitution Article II, Section II, Clause II:
the Congress may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments
A special counsel is an "inferior officer". In all previous cases, either the President appointed or Congress requested the Attorney General appoint a special counsel. Garland had neither when he appointed Smith. Rep. Masse brought this up during a Congressional hearing as well. The last special counsel appointment expired with the case it was investigating and did not grant the Attorney General any authority to appoint a new one at will.
@urtriggered2 There were no motions made at the beginning that challenged the SC's authority. Those were more recent, hence why it took so long.
@@user-db6ps7pb7d Not according to Andy McCarthy who used to be attorney general I think that was his title. He is the one who brought attention to Jack Smith's illegal appointment.
@urtriggered2 because this decision is wrong and will be overturned.
Jack offs appeal will be turned down. Cannon is the only judge so far that has rulled following the law and using common sense so hats off to her. Wyda is a constitutional accountability president, really? She's obviously a mainsteam media liar. She's not mentioning the tampering with the documents by the FBI that was admitted to. The higher courts are gonna agree with her decision, its obvious she took the time and researched the law before making her decision.
LOL, no. She delayed, delayed, and delayed until a crooked and corrupt supreme court justice could write an opinion that wasn't even relevant to the case they were deciding that gave her a scapegoat to use. Republicans judges ignoring decades of precedent when it suits them.
@@tempaccount9944 You're silly.
Wydra is a legal clown
All 93 US attorneys have to be appointed by the President and confirmed by the senate
But a Special Counsel a de facto US attorney with more powers than the 93 does not???
Wydra also neglects to mention that there is no Special Counsel law on the books. The closest law expired 1999
@@newelllondon724 That's what you get if your career (i.e. Wydra's career) is mostly determined by sexual favours to superiors in stead of intellectual achievements. 🤷
@@abboed.4076 Sounds like a pretty good analysis of her legal intellect, there was next to zero legitimate legal assessment on her part
🎯👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼
The genie is out
8 million dollars to his author thats why
She didn’t mention that jack smith was a civilian who had no authority at all. She’s clearly biased.
The DOJ oversees the Special Counsel's office KID
@@ItsMeT---426 Only after being being approved by Congress.
@@Solargeek 😂 § 600.1 Grounds for appointing a Special Counsel.
The Attorney General, or in cases in which the Attorney General is recused, the Acting Attorney General, will appoint a Special Counsel when he or she determines that criminal investigation of a person or matter is warranted and-
(a) That investigation or prosecution of that person or matter by a United States Attorney's Office or litigating Division of the Department of Justice would present a conflict of interest for the Department or other extraordinary circumstances; and
(b) That under the circumstances, it would be in the public interest to appoint an outside Special Counsel to assume responsibility for the matter.
@@Solargeek😆 *WRONG* Read the law...
Jack Smith is a member of the justice department and was working for the justice department at the world Court in the Hague boy you people really really are not educated at all
Whining!! Justice Thomas gave Judge Cannon the go ahead!!
exactly! The signal was clear in the presidential immunity decision. Those of use able to traverse in and out of echo chambers can see it clear as day.
Constitutional text is against jack smith
Exactly. I'm not sure what she meant by the law is with Smith. There are special council appointed but they are confirmed by the senate or they aren't involved in a federal government case
Ty Cobbs said that many payoffs have been made..
Yess
Doubt it. 93 PAGES
why JACK Smith IS ILLEGAL.
So you know, the real baseball Ty Cobb was a certified racist.
Who is he? Do you have any links to your speculations?
@@TKUA11 Really you do not know who Ty Cobb is, sad go educate yourself
Morrison v. Olson, 487 U.S. 654 (1988)
36 years is NOT longstanding precedent.
In juris prudence timeframe that is more like a test case.
Jack Smith has no standing, lol.
He's in an unconstitutional appointment.
@@rcmysm9123 better do your research, your so wrong just making an absolute fool of yourself with your statement.
@@user-db6ps7pb7d
Case dismissed!
LOL!
You're not too smart
@@user-db6ps7pb7devery US attorney has to be appointed by the president and confirmed by the senate
But a special counsel with far more powers does not?
@@newelllondon724 correct, special counsel get appointed in cases as requested by the president to the attorney general so no one can claim partisanship. This fact has been proven over and over again and upheld by the Supreme Court. Attorney Bill Barr appointed three special counsels if I remember correctly, Mueller, Durham, Weiss, Hur were all appointed by republican attorney generals.
New Jersey Is One Place Or DC Where The Theft Took Place
lol..their parroting of the "unprecedented decision" pointing to appointments of other special council, all while ignoring the fact that each and every one of those appointments were with individuals who were already US attorneys.....not private citizens as Jack Smith is. Bunch of ignorant liars expecting everyone to believe them. Sad. Their others "options" are also ridiculous. None of them will ever happen and even if they did, it would be laughed out of court.
@@snunya9399 Robert Mueller was retired and they used him for the Russia probe.
They used Robert Mueller for the Russia probe. He was retired
@snunya9399 jack smith isn't and hasn't been a private citizen in his career. This has been rehashed repeatedly and found to be legal. There is precedence from Nixon. The use of special counsels are to support impartiality and fair proceedings. And no not all have been US attorneys
exactly! These people either don't understand or choose not to understand.
@@icshay21 read Cannon's decision. She address that at around page 53.
Well you know exactly how Clarence Thomas is going to vote!
He’s Gona vote to keep those bribes coming
Correctly!!
This will take years to make it to the Supreme Court, if it ever does.
@@bytemuncher1 Maybe a year. Smith is not only handling the classified documents case but the Jan 6 case. So you're have a split court issue between the 11th District Court of Appeals and the DC Circuit court. This will likely expedite it to SCOTUS if either of these courts disagree.
😂😂😂😂😂😂 corruption at it's best. They criticize other countries when here in our own backyard it's happening
It’s not corruption it’s obstruction of justice. Trump stole those documents and then obstructed the investigation to get those documents back. There is tons of evidence against him, and one of trumps employees even publicly came out and spoke the truth about them moving boxes to hide them from investigators
Interesting she did not comment at all on how Jack Smith's selection for special counsel was different from other special counsel appointments. That's because she does not want to acknowledge that it was.
It's pretty clear that.Jack Smith did NOT have the constitutional authority to become a Special Counsel. He was pushed through by AG Merrick Garland, regardless of what the law says about the approval process for a Special Counsel. Garland has NO RESPECT for the law. Thank goodness he never went through the Senate investigation process for nomination to the SCOTUS. That is one of the few things I can give Mitch McConnell credit for.
It's not an outlier. Just a few days ago, Justice Thomas wrote a concurrence (correction, I previously said "dissent") specifically addressing this issue
That was an unsolicited opinion by Judge Thomas, and therefore outside the bounds of the Supreme Court rules
It was not a descent. It was in conjunction with the ruling on presidential immunity does an unsolicited outlier and not warranted under Supreme Court rules.
Ok. Point noted. It was a concurring opinion, not a dissent
Waste of paper.
DC does not matter. She took her time and laid out the arguments. Not to mention when someone abuses thier power it takes a different review by many.
He was not appointed by congress as the law reads, also, those documents are classified, He did not have the power to even look at them.
Well neither was 'special' counsel David Weiss in the ridiculous Hunter Biden witch hunt. Ready to give that up?
Wow! That's a real good point, I never even thought about that aspect, he wasn't Authorized to even view those Classified Docs! You made my day!
You know he does not have security clearance. You a real smarty pant.
@@prospros54fiftyfour67 You must live on the left side of Leftist Street, in Leftington.
Jack Smith's appointment was unconstitutional. In the Supreme Court's decision on presidential immunity, it was evident that the justices were notably skeptical about the manner in which Jack Smith was appointed. While his appeal was entirely predictable, it is unlikely to succeed in the long run. Although the case may continue to be contested, the decision will stand even if it ultimately requires intervention by the Supreme Court (which I think it may).
Says the guy with no credentials whatsoever or he would have bragged on them. Then the same tard (you) loosely cites the corrupt SCOTUS with at least two justices trying very hard to not be held criminally responsible for their own actions by keeping the former corrupt president immune from his actions. Basically, all criminal GOPs get a free pass. HARD NO!
Thomas was the only one that even mentioned it, none of the other judges even mentioned or sided with Thomas.
@@user-db6ps7pb7d That's because it was a "warning shot across the bow," as the saying goes-one that Jack doesn't want to accept. It is highly unlikely that this would be included if it weren't important. The Supreme Court rules on as few specifics as possible; for example, in the presidential immunity decision, they said Trump may have immunity (contraray to what msm tell you) but did not make a definitive ruling on his case. Instead, they sent it back to a lower court for further consideration, outlining different categories of immunity that might apply.
There was an amicus brief to scotus an also one of the judges remark that jack smith is illegitimate and this woman is not revealing what she must know.
They still keep tryint
Special counsels are constitutional unless the defendant is Trump.😮
He could file in DC or New Jersey!
@@user-db6ps7pb7d has to be in the southern Florida district, it's under their jurisdiction. You can't judge shop.
@@jimmanis6717But they sure wish that they could 😂
That sure sounds political.
@@fred2903 yeah I am amazed that these shows put out so much info that a 2 second google search can debunk. He was never appointed and there were almost 100 other people Garland could have appointed and they would be legal. Why he chose Smith is a mystery.
Still?
The Judge raised objections to three points of special counsel that fundamentally need to be judicially, addressed… and finally laid to rest,… Senate confirmation, the oversight necessity, the funding source. These issues have hanging over the appointment of special counsel and putting its legitimacy into question. This “progressive” lawyer self-described on her own website as Progressive needs to stop making money on slyly misleading others… beauty and speaking craftily do not replace the truth, no matter no matter the professed level of competency.
He was not appointed properly, how can your "expert" say he didn't need to be correctly appointed?
There is precedent, Cannon didn't change that.
This won't survive appeal, neither will Cannon.
Garland has the legal right to appoint Smith. THAT IS THE LAW. Cannon will be overturned and removed from the case.
@@Qingeaton yes Jack Smith did they already said that trump is paying people to be on his side judge canon is getting ready gifting from trump and judge Thames is to alone with the other two judges but it won't work because Jack Smith is going to win and judge cannon will be removed from trump case because judge canon knows trump did all what they said he did judge canon thinks trump is going back into the white house and by that he will give her a part she should have never been on the case any how she got into trouble the last time she tried to help trump she's another one of trump little boot licker but it getting ready to fall apart because they no that judge Thomas has been getting gifts and judge cannon also the both of them are gone another judge told judge canon not to take trump case but she didn't listen judge canon is in real big trouble but she doesn't no it because she didn't do her job 😍🤩
@@specialladyt Smith was a citizen, not an officer of the government. I don't know why they chose him, but he did not go through the processes that would have made it legal. Probably because they were in a rush to convict Trump of something....anything. The ruling may be overturned. I believe she has now finished the case, so no need to remove her. She's finished now. The 11th circuit may over rule her decision, and then the Supreme Court will over rule them, so Cannon will be proven to be right.
Who would have thought Trump would be acquitted by a judge he pointed. Prize Criminals!
Jack smith wont have standimg to appeal..not correvtly appointed
He moved swiftly, because he knows he's an illegal special counsel.
Guess you don't remember the findings when Clinton held on to his documents..do ya..
You still on that Clinton BS get over it. Damn!
Truly stated, "the supreme court matters", and Leonard Leo and his ilk surely know that.
Can't use illegally obtained evidence so how do you file with out evidence?
Thomas's advisory concurrence was an Easter Egg for Judge Cannon. Thomas might as well have been running Cannon by remote control. None of the precedent since the 1800's support her ruling.
American justice beyond absurd
Yes the appeal will succeed. Odviously the Trump appointed judge has been favoring him from the start.
lol...no..it won't succeed. Cannon has closed that door. SCOTUS has already made this clear.
Obviously, or odiously, I like them both.
And obviously ALL of the other judges are of a different political persuasion....so what's your point?
@@FungusAmungus-fl8iypoint is justice hasn’t been served by this judge. Obviously she has a bias to the guy who got her this job
None of this is "justice." NONE OF IT.@@TKUA11
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 bye felicia the case is dead
He cant appeal hes not a special counsel its over so is jan.6 presidential immunity jack smith should go to jail
Maybe you should go back and read constitutional law. He was not confirmed by the Senate to be a US attorney.
So, what about all of the other cases where the special counsel was just appointed and not confirmed by the Senate ?
Typical republican logic, the rules applies for everyone except me.
exactly, but some people just don't want to accept it. If some how Jack wins the appeal (that may happen) ultimately it will go up to the supreme court who has already clearly voiced skepticism towards Jack's appointment in the recent presidential immunity decision. They will almost certainly rule against Jack.
More importantly the Presidential Records Act does not confer criminal jurisdiction. There are no criminal penalties for refusal to turn over presidential records. It is intended to be a civil proceeding.
And it clearly supersedes all other laws pertaining to presidential records. Any document that is not a private document is a presidential record including classified documents.
@@automateeverything2341 Then Hunter Biden can go free, right?
What precedent?
Thomas ,alito , kavenaugh,barret, could we guess how they will vote, oh lets not forget ol clarence thomas, to say this court is compromised is an understatement.!
I approve.
Girls go make someone a sammich.
Atta boy, cowboy 🤠
best comment in years
Trump 2024! lets go Brandon...
Your missing the factual evidence, explicitly articulated in Judge Cannon’s order😂
Far left Bloomberg so triggered!
Was this case dismissed with prejudice?
I appreciate the information given by the video. And like someone else say, we know how Clarence Thomas will vote. But the lady blinks so much that it's distracting. Watch her again.
Holy Hell .....SPARTZ that women is way way batshit nuts......
Henchmen not required.
Yea, lets waste millions more dollars of taxpayers money, for nothing.
Such biased reporting.
Don't it means if they get the appeal and past the retail and would be going to have a different judge i believe that's true cause it would be the same when it went back to her
Nope. Case would be remanded back to her. The only difference is that the authority question would no longer be an issue.
Jury if his peers, yeah- right
Come on! He left classified material setting next to his Corvette in his garage!!! Oh! Wait a minute....... Nevermind.
How many time did the feds ask him to return them ? How many times did he order his immigrant employees to hide them ? Did the feds have to get a warrant, and finally raid JB's garage again ?
*ZERO* times. See the difference ?
Didn't think so.......
"a well meaning old man , with a poor memory"
As usual, total disinformation from this rag.
Get a grip there are no legal appoinment of smith.
It doesn't matter if it's constitutional or unconstitutional or if he has jurisdiction blah blah blah none of that matters because Jack Smith is about 6 months away from being unemployed
@@SlimPickins-lj7rd and everybody else right behind it I'm afraid. Nobody's getting the whole story on these news shows and everybody's blaming the other team and that's not the the whole truth is our biggest problem right now. We all think we know better and we don't know anything. Please approach the news like that when you consume. Nobody is telling everything
Smith was not assigned by POTUS, nor approved by Congress or Senate....the AG does not have the authority to assign Smith as Special Counsel....
Ha ha ha ha! Law-fare works both ways, huh?
FJB
The gods have made their choice.
Trump ❤️❤
Opinion from a lady that was just arrested for being crooked
How many times is it that Jack has been defeated now?
All you legal eagles
😂😂😂😂
VOTE BLUE 💙💙💙
Have a look at who the CAC is and its "mission" - says it all.
Trump 2024!
FELON
How NY cases going
Democrat propaganda...
B.S. take the L
Trump 2024
But, Justice Thomas is messing with the special counsel job, isn't he?
Yup unsolicited ruling which is not legal according to the Supreme Court on rules
@@barryking5993that means since the corrupt Supreme Court don't follow the constitution 7:36 n.
Double jeopardy ???
We'll see all you bots after the reversal.
tell the people do you want to keep the current process or do you want the whims of a political appointee
You’re not making any sense
@@bdobson1616 - your ‘choices’ are the same things.
Baldwin just had his case dismissed also!
But these people don't care.. they also don't appear to care what the federal law is.. kinda crazy
I think this lady does not understand s...
Its THE AG who appoints the special Prosecutor, never the Pres.
The Mueller Report ... In Ten Acts...🎬 .on TH-cam
The Raid was unprecedented . Trump was in discussion and working to please the Document Archives bureaucrats even though he had no obligation to do so. The case was unprecedented . Jack Smith was not employed directly by the DOJ . It is to be Garland to file a protest.
Justice is Returning. Also Young Thug judge just removed from the trial. J Smith has lost numerous times on appeal because of over charging.
Did Biden just opened this constitutional accountability center? When did we get that office?
If your right then Trump should appoint Rudy Giuliani as Special Council....
Apparently all you need to do is run for POTUS to avoid criminal charges….
Yet once again I am being censored for telling simple facts that the powers that B can't handle
Kangaroo court dismisses charges.
Cry more
Blah blah its UNCONSTITUTIONAL.
Spartz doesn’t know how our justice system works.
k..t
All of that was on the side of a president, not a king, but here we are.
Face is sooooo creepy, stop it with the filters on your camera, you are so distracting!!!