If you have any questions related to the topic mention it in the comments, our experts will reply back soon. If you want to become a certified SAFe Practitioner do check our certification program: bit.ly/3co9gcj
Thank you for the excellent overview of SAFe 5. I can recommend this to all who previously only knew the Big Picture of SAFe and would like to learn what SAFe is, for whom it is and for whom it is rather not. Regards PS: As a QA tip, on slide 13 the 4th bullet point is missing, the 2nd is listed twice....
Hello fellow carbon-based life forms! I hold great human expectations upon your eventual enjoyment of the presented information. If this may be the case, do not be forgetful about actively acknowledging said enjoyment nor incorporating yourself into our frequent observer database!
This gave me a very good overall understanding of SAFe, and I would definitely recommend it. A few small things that would make it even better: As mentioned by others, the computer-generated voice is monotone and uninteresting. I would prefer to hear the enthusiasm of a real person who loves SAFe. The use of expressions like "you guys" doesn't sit well with the fake voice, it feels like a computer is trying to be "paly" with me. Freaky! In places, the text and the words being spoken wandered a bit too far apart forcing me to choose between reading and listening. A very nice job. 5 starts.
Great presentation, one of my favorite points was that the framework will not fix your organization or succeed is senior leadership is not bought in. I do think that this framework is more suitable and beneficial for tightly coupled environments. If you have even a large org where the groups are separated by domains with a fair amount of autonomy you can get by with a lighter touch more focused on alignment and less on close coordination.
Thanks for the presentation. It has proved to me that SAFe is a complex framework which adds to organisational bureaucracy. I am not sure if there are companies that uses this framework?
For Platform Development Project, skill level and competencies required from developers may change from Iteration to Iteration, in that case do you recommend changing team members every two-three weeks?
Are there any real life case studies that you can point us to where this framework was explicitly applied to software development? Agile is also most commonly applied to *implementing* complex software e.g. ERP systems. Do you advocate this and how does it affect the content of the framework?
The agenda at the beginning of this video includes "14. Advantages of Using SAFe", but I cannot find the corresponding part of the video. Can you point that section out?
Good video. I now understand why security continues to go down as agility continues to increase though. Until the value stream cost of being first to market by the cost of having to pay ransomeware or other business costs, this will continue to create an unsecured product...but because it is fully functional nobody cares.
Unfortunately that is a wrong conclusion. SAFe or Agile mandate isn't business security. This doesn't mean it doesn't care about it but rather that it is not in the scope of the process. They explain to you how to coordinate work, not what the work is about. Many company have SBD (Security by Design) process which is embedded in the grooming and story building that happens within the Agile Framework. Security and Agile have absolutely nothing to do with each other. This is entirely on to the business responsibility to handle that
@@Snutze BTW, software and network security should be major elements of the design, but they are not. That was the point of my post. Security is still more often than not ignored.
The slides are good, but I found the TTS narrator to be very distracting and difficult to understand. And the pace of the discussion is so fast it's hard to retain the information. Would be much better with a human narrator that's just talking slower, and able to emphasize key points with their voice instead of speaking in a droning manner like the TTS.
Thank you for watching the video! We are glad that you like it. Based on your interest, we thought the this playlist might help you : bit.ly/329mWn3. Do check it out.
the hackers won, really AGILE just means thowing the structured design methodolgies in the bin and admitting that it's better to just let the Devs work how to do it through iterative development.. i.e. it's a formalisation and improvement of the hacking process with some added Acronyms and bureaucratic process to bamboozle the bean counters, funny old world :)
It's a scam is what it is. None of this stuff makes sense. It's a tool for cheaters in the USA and not much for a real 'please make me this and encrypt it to this specs' sort of project that experts could make, even on 1 or 2 man teams.
No it's not! Because it is not prescriptive in the way that traditional methods of project management are, agile management is frequently referred to as a set of principles rather than a methodology
The problem is safe is very prescriptive. The best thing would if Dean just told the truth and declared SAFe as its very own methodology rather than pretend its "agile"
You really need to proofread your slides. If you’re championing something saying it’s going to improve quality, you shouldn’t make so many mistakes in your presentation.
While the information was interesting the narration is terrible, so many grammar errors for example in the closing statement about training at Invensis the AI narrator says live - as in alive instead of live - as in now and in person. It broke my concentration many times.
1st thought when the voice started, it's generated. If its not, then this person has zero vocal inflection when speaking...this is very unlikely, leading me to believe it is generated.
If you have any questions related to the topic mention it in the comments, our experts will reply back soon. If you want to become a certified SAFe Practitioner do check our certification program: bit.ly/3co9gcj
Thank you for the excellent overview of SAFe 5. I can recommend this to all who previously only knew the Big Picture of SAFe and would like to learn what SAFe is, for whom it is and for whom it is rather not. Regards
PS: As a QA tip, on slide 13 the 4th bullet point is missing, the 2nd is listed twice....
Hello fellow carbon-based life forms! I hold great human expectations upon your eventual enjoyment of the presented information. If this may be the case, do not be forgetful about actively acknowledging said enjoyment nor incorporating yourself into our frequent observer database!
This gave me a very good overall understanding of SAFe, and I would definitely recommend it. A few small things that would make it even better:
As mentioned by others, the computer-generated voice is monotone and uninteresting. I would prefer to hear the enthusiasm of a real person who loves SAFe. The use of expressions like "you guys" doesn't sit well with the fake voice, it feels like a computer is trying to be "paly" with me. Freaky!
In places, the text and the words being spoken wandered a bit too far apart forcing me to choose between reading and listening.
A very nice job. 5 starts.
Probably one of the best presentations I’ve seen in a while. Thanks for sharing. Will definitely look at the certification training offered.
SAFe framework explained in a very clear and concise manner. Thank you!!
Glad it was helpful!
Worked with SCRUM but never in Agile Organizations - this was very helpful as an overview. Thanks.
This video cleared my concepts and helped me easily get 98% score in SAFe POPM exam
Glad to help! That's nice to hear
One of the best explanation of SAFe agile framework
Great presentation, one of my favorite points was that the framework will not fix your organization or succeed is senior leadership is not bought in. I do think that this framework is more suitable and beneficial for tightly coupled environments. If you have even a large org where the groups are separated by domains with a fair amount of autonomy you can get by with a lighter touch more focused on alignment and less on close coordination.
Excellent run down. I've watched this about 6 times now. I really like the other videos as well. Thank you.
Thanks for such a detailed and clear lesson on SAFe. It has given a very clear picture of SAFe fundamentals and why or why not to use. Thanks again.
Such a wonderful source to know the SAFe in eagle's eye view and understand. Thank you for sharing.
Thanks for an informational training - that too, free of cost! Please post SAFe 6.0 too.
Great presentation which gives complete overview on Scaled Agile frame work
Very nice and straight to the point explanation of what SAFs is. Valt met de deur in huis.
Thank for your work and sharing that content for free 🙌
One of the best presentation. Thanks for sharing!
Thank you so much for your detailed explanation
Glad it was helpful!
thanks for sharing the details... very useful to get overall picture of SAFe
Thanks for the presentation. It has proved to me that SAFe is a complex framework which adds to organisational bureaucracy. I am not sure if there are companies that uses this framework?
Mine does. Wouldn't recommend.
Thanks a million for this video. You just gained a subscriber
It's a good video!! Thanks for share
Hello this is a perfect presentation, Where can i find the doc presented in the video ?
Hello
Thank you for the great presentation, possible to have the slides?
Great video, but an actual voiceover would make the video more interesting.
This right here is a great piece of work! Thank you. At this moment it has over 1600 likes and not a singel dislike - I see why!
This is really good. Do you have a SAFe 6 Tutorial as well ??
so informative good job and Thanks😀
Very help full!
Glad it was helpful!
For Platform Development Project, skill level and competencies required from developers may change from Iteration to Iteration, in that case do you recommend changing team members every two-three weeks?
Are there any real life case studies that you can point us to where this framework was explicitly applied to software development? Agile is also most commonly applied to *implementing* complex software e.g. ERP systems. Do you advocate this and how does it affect the content of the framework?
How is work prioritisation conduced using SAFe and Kanban as an agile framework for a Agile team? I understand how it is conducted using Scrum.
Wonderfullllll session
Thank you for this wonderful session, Can we download/access this presentation as well?
wonderful framework, thanks.
thank you for this video!
The agenda at the beginning of this video includes "14. Advantages of Using SAFe", but I cannot find the corresponding part of the video. Can you point that section out?
Pls can you gift us with the slides - as this video is just awesome
Better than my training
Really flying through the material, would be useful to also have the slides.
Thank you!
Good video. I now understand why security continues to go down as agility continues to increase though. Until the value stream cost of being first to market by the cost of having to pay ransomeware or other business costs, this will continue to create an unsecured product...but because it is fully functional nobody cares.
Unfortunately that is a wrong conclusion. SAFe or Agile mandate isn't business security. This doesn't mean it doesn't care about it but rather that it is not in the scope of the process. They explain to you how to coordinate work, not what the work is about. Many company have SBD (Security by Design) process which is embedded in the grooming and story building that happens within the Agile Framework. Security and Agile have absolutely nothing to do with each other. This is entirely on to the business responsibility to handle that
@@Snutze no, that is not the wrong conclusion. That is the issue. It actually is in scope of the process.
@@Snutze BTW, software and network security should be major elements of the design, but they are not. That was the point of my post. Security is still more often than not ignored.
Great!!!!
Hi. Could you provide the presentation for download?
The slides are good, but I found the TTS narrator to be very distracting and difficult to understand. And the pace of the discussion is so fast it's hard to retain the information. Would be much better with a human narrator that's just talking slower, and able to emphasize key points with their voice instead of speaking in a droning manner like the TTS.
Actually it was perfectly good and understandable for me
Great presentation
How this course will helpful for a Test Engineer?
Great video, thank you!
excellent
Can you create a safe 6.0 training
Hello... please, Soares this presentation with us.
Thanks a lot
Latest version of SAFe is 6.0. Please correct.
thanks
@invensis Learning - Love this educative video. Is it possible to have the slides?
Hello,
Slide 54, I'm not sure that is the right definition of value stream, at least as it's described in the figure?
Hi Kamal. Thank you. We will definitely look into it.
Good overview - thanks!
Thank you for watching the video! We are glad that you like it. Based on your interest, we thought the this playlist might help you : bit.ly/329mWn3. Do check it out.
Great content, shame about the robot voice.
the 4 core values are different as per SAFE 6
Speech sounds like generated by AI
Actual version is safe 5.1
the hackers won, really AGILE just means thowing the structured design methodolgies in the bin and admitting that it's better to just let the Devs work how to do it through iterative development.. i.e. it's a formalisation and improvement of the hacking process with some added Acronyms and bureaucratic process to bamboozle the bean counters, funny old world :)
Agile is not a methodology. It's a set of values and principles. You got it wrong at the very beginning.
That's perspective, as it is also a methodology even if it is a set of values and principles, no matter how you slice it.
It's a scam is what it is. None of this stuff makes sense. It's a tool for cheaters in the USA and not much for a real 'please make me this and encrypt it to this specs' sort of project that experts could make, even on 1 or 2 man teams.
No it's not! Because it is not prescriptive in the way that traditional methods of project management are, agile management is frequently referred to as a set of principles rather than a methodology
The problem is safe is very prescriptive. The best thing would if Dean just told the truth and declared SAFe as its very own methodology rather than pretend its "agile"
SAFe is pretty much always wrong
This is 2022 . Nobody works in "silos" any more
You really need to proofread your slides. If you’re championing something saying it’s going to improve quality, you shouldn’t make so many mistakes in your presentation.
Good presentation, but I'm going nuts listening to that AI voice...
EATFS
While the information was interesting the narration is terrible, so many grammar errors for example in the closing statement about training at Invensis the AI narrator says live - as in alive instead of live - as in now and in person.
It broke my concentration many times.
Although the content is reasonable, this is very monotone, sounds like a computer, not a human voice. This makes it very difficult to concentrate on.
1st thought when the voice started, it's generated. If its not, then this person has zero vocal inflection when speaking...this is very unlikely, leading me to believe it is generated.
@@kennethh2430 it's definitely generated.
Yeah, pretty obvious AI-generated voice and a huge detractor to the video overall.
SAFe == shitty agile for executives