The man asserts his role as the father and holds complete rights to the inheritance. He clarified that before the transfer of the land to the individual now threatening to take his own life, the family convened for a critical discussion. During this gathering, they agreed to pass on the property to him. Unfortunately, the chief neglected to involve all the family members during that crucial conversation, leading to further complications.
The second issue centred on a particular individual from Glendale, and I couldn't shake my dissatisfaction with the decision that had been reached. The outcome seemed fundamentally unfair, leaving me perplexed and struggling to grasp the rationale behind it. As before, the chief overlooked the importance of summoning a crucial witness-the very person who sold the land to the man who provided the funds to bail out his brother from jail. The absence of this testimony felt like a significant oversight that contributed to a lack of clarity in the case.
Haaa Mambo ava havasi fair …muridzi wenhaka mwana we muridzi wemunda ,kwete vazukuru ,muzukuru anowana nhaka kuna baba vavo… Mambo hamusi fair nxaaah same same naMakoni
The chief has held three hearings focused on land disputes, one of which addressed a case involving an individual who was allocated a parcel of land situated in a designated grazing area. In a recent decision, the chief has mandated that the houses constructed on this land be demolished by March 2025. I believe that it is inappropriate to impose the destruction of a completed home outright, especially when there may be other viable alternatives to consider that could accommodate both the land use and the housing situation.
The chief is of the opinion that the land has indeed been sold; however, he does not possess adequate evidence to substantiate the claim that the transaction took place he proved that during the formal hearing. Throughout the course of these legal proceedings, the chief has altered his decisions on several occasions, which has contributed to a growing sense of confusion and uncertainty regarding his true stance on the matter. This lack of clarity has made it difficult for both the parties involved and the audience to understand the chief's position, raising questions about the reliability of his statements and the overall integrity of the hearing process.
What specific evidence can we find that confirms the alleged father’s status as a land baron? Additionally, where can we locate proof that he has engaged in the sale of any land?
But uyu akapihwa munda ka nemuridzi, bzmnn is simply upholding his mother's wishes and decision. Saka they are simply disputing their granny and aunties' decision.
The chief is not performing his duties effectively, and I am pretty disappointed with his leadership. His lack of competence negatively impacts many people who rely on him for guidance and fair judgment. As a result, trust in his abilities is wavering, and many are left feeling frustrated and let down. The land issue presents a considerable challenge, and he struggles to express the concept of inheritance effectively. There are moments when he leans toward the perspective that prioritises inheritance, advocating for the rights of heirs. Conversely, there are times when he aligns himself with the legal framework, emphasising the importance of existing laws and regulations. This inconsistency creates confusion and highlights the complexity of the situation.
The man asserts his role as the father and holds complete rights to the inheritance. He clarified that before the transfer of the land to the individual now threatening to take his own life, the family convened for a critical discussion. During this gathering, they agreed to pass on the property to him. Unfortunately, the chief neglected to involve all the family members during that crucial conversation, leading to further complications.
Chief chiweshe nyaya tongai mushe
Muzukuru akaenda ku Civil Court anohwina pachena ....
Uyu mambo wakadhakwa
Mambo zvaidii maziva kt muzukuru munhuwo,Seiko boys idzo madziitira favour
Muridzi wenhaka anopa waanoda not kuda kubatira munhu endai ku civil court vanoihwina
The second issue centred on a particular individual from Glendale, and I couldn't shake my dissatisfaction with the decision that had been reached. The outcome seemed fundamentally unfair, leaving me perplexed and struggling to grasp the rationale behind it. As before, the chief overlooked the importance of summoning a crucial witness-the very person who sold the land to the man who provided the funds to bail out his brother from jail. The absence of this testimony felt like a significant oversight that contributed to a lack of clarity in the case.
Mambo uyu nedare rake haagone kugadzirisa issues
Haaa Mambo ava havasi fair …muridzi wenhaka mwana we muridzi wemunda ,kwete vazukuru ,muzukuru anowana nhaka kuna baba vavo…
Mambo hamusi fair nxaaah same same naMakoni
Saka muzukuru wemwanasikana haakwanisi kupiwa pekugara nana sekuru vake here
The chief has held three hearings focused on land disputes, one of which addressed a case involving an individual who was allocated a parcel of land situated in a designated grazing area. In a recent decision, the chief has mandated that the houses constructed on this land be demolished by March 2025. I believe that it is inappropriate to impose the destruction of a completed home outright, especially when there may be other viable alternatives to consider that could accommodate both the land use and the housing situation.
Chife regai mwana aware sekuru avo vacharima kamakura hre vano musaomese musoro mwana wemuzimbabwe kana vachida kumutegesera gavataure
Twine utsinye twu vanhu utwu ngaende civil court
I bp here inopa vanhu kuita offtpopic
Idzi dzinogonekwa kwa chief Mutasa chete dze land idzi
If it was chief mutasa dai nyaya yapera..muzukuru vakaenda ku civil court ano winner case
The chief is of the opinion that the land has indeed been sold; however, he does not possess adequate evidence to substantiate the claim that the transaction took place he proved that during the formal hearing. Throughout the course of these legal proceedings, the chief has altered his decisions on several occasions, which has contributed to a growing sense of confusion and uncertainty regarding his true stance on the matter. This lack of clarity has made it difficult for both the parties involved and the audience to understand the chief's position, raising questions about the reliability of his statements and the overall integrity of the hearing process.
What specific evidence can we find that confirms the alleged father’s status as a land baron? Additionally, where can we locate proof that he has engaged in the sale of any land?
Mambo vari biased ava
Zvakatoitika chitosiyai zvakadaro
Saka imi mukuda kuti vanhu vatengese nhaka😢
But uyu akapihwa munda ka nemuridzi, bzmnn is simply upholding his mother's wishes and decision.
Saka they are simply disputing their granny and aunties' decision.
The chief is not performing his duties effectively, and I am pretty disappointed with his leadership. His lack of competence negatively impacts many people who rely on him for guidance and fair judgment. As a result, trust in his abilities is wavering, and many are left feeling frustrated and let down. The land issue presents a considerable challenge, and he struggles to express the concept of inheritance effectively. There are moments when he leans toward the perspective that prioritises inheritance, advocating for the rights of heirs. Conversely, there are times when he aligns himself with the legal framework, emphasising the importance of existing laws and regulations. This inconsistency creates confusion and highlights the complexity of the situation.
Kubvisa kudiiko iyeakawaka. Mupei mari yake
Dhefinetiri
Cameraman ari kukanganwa basa rake ndodaira ave kuto terera hatichawona ari kutaura takungowona mambo chete
Land baron ngariende kujeri. Vanoda kudya mari votuma umwe munhu kuti aite claim land. So pane umwe anga achida kutotenga.
Chiweshe idofo