@@kaballfs No. It's a very straightforward problem that I can easily do with the maths I learnt over 60 years ago (I did not do maths beyond secondary school). verdansk4761 thinks the same. I can't understand where you get your "someone will learn to do this finally" from.
The mistake is in using the division sign in the first place. Use horizontal bars (with numerators and denominators). Else use parenthesis to make intent clear. As is, this is purposefully ambiguous and so reflects poorly on the author. It's a rorschach test, not math.
High egos cover low self esteem. If you don't need this, then go on to your level. I am a teacher and I'm teaching myself quantum mechanics. I am going over everything I can use to excercise my brain. Perhaps you should as well.
This is a simple question. I just want to point out that the setting of the question is no good. For the 4 options, D is a fraction but the other3 are whole numbers. MC questions should not be like that. No odd one should be there.
La división no satisface la propiedad asociativa, por lo tanto, si no se colocan paréntesis para indicar el orden en el que deben efectuarse las operaciones, la expresión no está bien definida. No deben poner estos problemas que contienen un error conceptual intrínseco porque lo que fomentan es la desinformación.
@@santitabnavascues8673 Esa regla no está presente en el sistema axiomático del conjunto de los números reales, por lo tanto, es una regla personal que tu utilizas. La matemática no funciona de esa forma. Las reglas son universales. Efectuar las operaciones de izquierda a derecha te parecerá lo más natural, pero no está explícitamente formulado en el sistema de axiomas y por lo tanto no es válido. Si una persona habituada a la escritura de medio oriente, hebreo o árabe por ejemplo, lo leerá de derecha a izquierda, y eso es lo más natural para él. Restríngete a utilizar las reglas universales, basadas en las fuentes válidas. Porque estás instruyendo a personas que no tienen la formación para dilucidar si lo que dices es válido o no.
It's probably been said before, but the guy introduces himself as BRAIN LOGIC, yet the name that he gives his channel is BRIAN LOGIC. I enjoyed the irony of failing to engage the brain in a channel called Brain Logic.😂
Oh, look at all you clever clogs out there. This is a tutorial for people out there who want to learn, which I am sure some viewers have done. There are plenty of channels like this because this is what TH-cam is for, unfortunately, there are more people like you.
Why do you insist in using that infantile ÷ sign when ISO 80000-2-9.6 clearly states you shouldn't? Even if you corrected that and used the solidus (/) instead it would still be wrong by ISO 80000-1_7.3.3: "These provisions can be extended to cases where the numerator, denominator or both are themselves products or quotients. In such a combination, a solidus (/) shall not be followed by a multiplication sign or a division sign on the same line unless parentheses are inserted to avoid any ambiguity." But why bother with international standards?
Actually it’s b, which is 2. To start 6/3/6/3, the 3/6 in the middle is .5 so now you have 6/.5/6. The next step is 6/.5 (which is 12)/6. Lastly 12/6 is 2 😂
So, PEMDAS Rules state that you do the ÷ on the left first then you do the ÷ on the right. Then you divide the result on the left by the result on the right, by way on the "÷" operation in the middle? Is that how it works? So the answer is 1, correct? i.e. 2 ÷ 2 = 1.
As for the video critics: this video is not meant for those who already know how to navigate the order of operations - its meant for students who are learning.
@@aspenrebel sorry sir it’s my bad ,my eyes saw it first as 6 x 3,that’s the bad thing if a person doesn’t take it seriously but anyway it’s my mistake but life goes on
I dont know why people get confused with an ":" sign... the easiest way to solve it is changing ":" to "×" ... so, te operation can be write as 6×(1/3)×(1/6)×(1/3) ... easier now?
An excessively long explanation of a very straightforward problem.
Exactly 💯
Good. Hopefully someone will learn how to do this finally.
@@kaballfs No. It's a very straightforward problem that I can easily do with the maths I learnt over 60 years ago (I did not do maths beyond secondary school). verdansk4761 thinks the same. I can't understand where you get your "someone will learn to do this finally" from.
"A straight left to right, in order as is" works better.
Verbose even at the most basic teaching level!
A really complicated explanation to a very simple problem, you can either do this one or cant, there is no guessing multiple wrong answers
The mistake is in using the division sign in the first place. Use horizontal bars (with numerators and denominators). Else use parenthesis to make intent clear. As is, this is purposefully ambiguous and so reflects poorly on the author. It's a rorschach test, not math.
When devide 2 division you m the first by the inverse of the second
Use brackets first and do whats inside of them first. This avoids confusion.
1/9 D
6÷3=2
2÷6=1/3
1/3÷3=1/9
Took 5 sec in my head ?
Helpful thank you sir 😊
comverting to multiplication takes away the uncertainty of order of division, as multiplication can happen in any order if all terms are multiplied.
Syntax error with the current status of division. You have to write with ratios .
D) 1/9 Did it in my head in 2 seconds.
.1111111111
TITTO!
Same. All the calculations are division, so simply work left to right. 👍
Took me 3 secs.
@@chrisbyrne5678Is working right to left the answer is 1/36.
Rewrite 6 x 1/3 x 1/6 x 1/3
6 x 1/6 = 1 therefore
1/3 x 1/3 = 1/9
High egos cover low self esteem. If you don't need this, then go on to your level. I am a teacher and I'm teaching myself quantum mechanics. I am going over everything I can use to excercise my brain. Perhaps you should as well.
6÷3÷6÷3=
2. ÷6÷3=
1/3÷3=
1/3×3 = 1/9
Phân số ÷ số nguyên thì giữ nguyên tử số ,mẫu số × số nguyên
D) 1/9
When in the “real world” do these rules pop up?
2+2=4 y-2-2=-4
This is a simple question. I just want to point out that the setting of the question is no good. For the 4 options, D is a fraction but the other3 are whole numbers. MC questions should not be like that. No odd one should be there.
La división no satisface la propiedad asociativa, por lo tanto, si no se colocan paréntesis para indicar el orden en el que deben efectuarse las operaciones, la expresión no está bien definida.
No deben poner estos problemas que contienen un error conceptual intrínseco porque lo que fomentan es la desinformación.
Si no hay paréntesis y las operaciones tienen la misma preferencia, se ejecutan en el orden en el que aparecen. No hay ambigüedad en eso
@@santitabnavascues8673 Esa regla no está presente en el sistema axiomático del conjunto de los números reales, por lo tanto, es una regla personal que tu utilizas. La matemática no funciona de esa forma. Las reglas son universales.
Efectuar las operaciones de izquierda a derecha te parecerá lo más natural, pero no está explícitamente formulado en el sistema de axiomas y por lo tanto no es válido.
Si una persona habituada a la escritura de medio oriente, hebreo o árabe por ejemplo, lo leerá de derecha a izquierda, y eso es lo más natural para él.
Restríngete a utilizar las reglas universales, basadas en las fuentes válidas.
Porque estás instruyendo a personas que no tienen la formación para dilucidar si lo que dices es válido o no.
@@gustavoriosmartinez7061 si a las matemáticas les falta ese axioma, no es mi problema.
need to slow down, accent can interfere
My God, you are like my college biology teacher. By the time you get even half way thru explaining it, no one cares anymore.
.............. 1/2 way thru ........ then the girl will get pregnant.
1 Is the answer. Can you explain how did this P.E.M.D.A.S. problem convert into a fraction?"
It's only a joke
What us 2÷6=?
a) 1
The mistake is writing an equation in this form.
Since there are two pair of number like 6/3 and another 6/3 in theiddle of it is the sign which is division then the ans is 2/2= 1
Are you alright? Off your meds?
1/9. Someone like the sound of their own voice. I suggest you FF to the end.
2:6:3=1/3:3=1/3•1/3= 1/9
Left to right order of operations
1
D)
Where do B and C come from?
The mistake is setting a problem using the obelus as a division sign and expecting your students to know what the question is.
D) 1/9 easy
6
-
3
-
6
- 1
3 = -
9
Thank you
A)
1/9
d 1/9
It's probably been said before, but the guy introduces himself as BRAIN LOGIC, yet the name that he gives his channel is BRIAN LOGIC. I enjoyed the irony of failing to engage the brain in a channel called Brain Logic.😂
i ❤ Olympiad Mathematics
I got 1
Whichever way you do it the answer is 1
2 entre 2=1 porque1A
I chose D before even seeing this video it's pretty obvious
We xant be fooled by not following matgematicak standards.
What about from right to left?
You would get an answer outside of the available options
That’s backwards
2/2=1 ou 18/18=1
Oh, look at all you clever clogs out there. This is a tutorial for people out there who want to learn, which I am sure some viewers have done. There are plenty of channels like this because this is what TH-cam is for, unfortunately, there are more people like you.
0.11
The second way
3
My answer is b2.
D...
i ❤ Mathematics
a. 1
1 is the answer
d.
Why do you insist in using that infantile ÷ sign when ISO 80000-2-9.6 clearly states you shouldn't?
Even if you corrected that and used the solidus (/) instead it would still be wrong by ISO 80000-1_7.3.3:
"These provisions can be extended to cases where the numerator, denominator or both are themselves products or quotients. In such a combination, a solidus (/) shall not be followed by a multiplication sign or a division sign on the same line unless parentheses are inserted to avoid any ambiguity."
But why bother with international standards?
Opción a
.1111111111 1/3 Is size of each piece of the whole. 2 wholes. 33% ÷ 3 = 11% .33 ÷ 3 = .1111..
porque 1A Esa es una Ciencias Buesna
1/9 is the ans. One can find it instantly looking at the digits and signs.
a,1
By the time this guy stopped talking my ears were bleeding!
Actually it’s b, which is 2. To start 6/3/6/3, the 3/6 in the middle is .5 so now you have 6/.5/6. The next step is 6/.5 (which is 12)/6. Lastly 12/6 is 2 😂
Since when did we start at the middle?
Answer is 1
D
I was wrong, because I didn't work from left to right, but from right to left: 6:3:2, and then 6:1,5 = 4.
A, 1
So, PEMDAS Rules state that you do the ÷ on the left first then you do the ÷ on the right. Then you divide the result on the left by the result on the right, by way on the "÷" operation in the middle? Is that how it works? So the answer is 1, correct? i.e. 2 ÷ 2 = 1.
2
1\3x1\3=1\9. d)1\9
d
2÷2=1
a) 1
The answer is (a) 1
dammed i chose A
Era impossibile fosse un numero = o >1.... ci voleva 1 secondo!
why so complicated? Try this 6 / 3 / 6 / 3 = 1 * 1/3 * 1/6 * 1/3 = 6/54 = 1/9. Much more easy i guess.
The answer is 1
A
Wow!!! I hope he’s not a teacher!!!
Too many words!!! Shorter!!!
6÷3=2
2÷6 can be simplified to 1/3
1/3 ÷ 3 is the same as
1/3 × 1/3 = 1/9
see? it's that simple
6÷3÷6÷3
= 2÷6÷3
=1/3÷3
=1/9
Good God I wouldn't want him to explain a whole page of problems.
As for the video critics: this video is not meant for those who already know how to navigate the order of operations - its meant for students who are learning.
18 : 6 = 3 : 3 = 1
Where the hell do you get 18 ?
@@aspenrebel sorry sir it’s my bad ,my eyes saw it first as 6 x 3,that’s the bad thing if a person doesn’t take it seriously but anyway it’s my mistake but life goes on
I failed 😢
a
Answer is d too long explanation
1 is wrong
99%???? No. Just no.
I dont know why people get confused with an ":" sign... the easiest way to solve it is changing ":" to "×" ... so, te operation can be write as
6×(1/3)×(1/6)×(1/3) ... easier now?
NO!!!!
Starts at 4:35
0.11111111111
This question is horribly written.
You are suppossed to put parenthesis.
1/9 is the answer
Waste of my time watching this few would ever need this.
another poorly formatted equation.
Annoying.
Stupid lengthy explanation 😭
You talk too much
The answer is 1/9
Stop this stupid click bait.
Too wordy...should be able to answer in 1 minute