Henning Wehn Hates The Royal Family - Room 101

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 2 ต.ค. 2024
  • Henning Wehn wants to abolish our beloved monarchy so they can have an opportunity of upward social mobility.
    Subscribe for more: bit.ly/hattricksub
    Visit Our Website: www.hattrick.c...
    Follow Hat Trick: / hattrickprod
    Like Hat Trick: www.facebook.c...

ความคิดเห็น • 700

  • @findinghare4588
    @findinghare4588 5 ปีที่แล้ว +653

    I swear this man is a genius haha “not all Germans are good people” 😂😂

    • @nicklewis1882
      @nicklewis1882 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      I can see this deteriorating into Basil Fawlty territory here!

    • @dingopisscreek
      @dingopisscreek 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      He's awful

    • @marcdavies7742
      @marcdavies7742 3 ปีที่แล้ว +29

      @@dingopisscreek not as awful as the royal family... the result of centuries of inbreeding😂

    • @jeanjacques9980
      @jeanjacques9980 2 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      @@dingopisscreek Yes he’s awfully funny.

    • @Johnny-sj9sj
      @Johnny-sj9sj 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@nicklewis1882 I mentioned him once but I think I got away with it.

  • @Josh23761
    @Josh23761 2 ปีที่แล้ว +42

    "They're my lot so I can make fun of them". Funny because it's true 🤣.

    • @brettb9194
      @brettb9194 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      and you know they don't teach the Civil War and the Restoration, or they bugger it up so badly everybody is yawning and texting nekkid photos to each other - no, all you get is some pap about King George and the Queen Mum visiting the commoners in the tube during the war - no mention that their father and their uncle started the whole thing

    • @kidaria1333
      @kidaria1333 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Not really. Only the inherited titles are german. They have been born in britan except Phillip. I truely do not understand why UK always tries to portray it that way only because there have been few inheriteted german titles thanks to marriage. All royal families have mixed roots because of international marriage.

    • @gazza595
      @gazza595 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@kidaria1333 You need to take a history lesson, all the Royal families of Europe are dominated by German heritage due to accidents of history and rules of inheritance. Henning is factually correct and you need to check your facts before commenting.

    • @kidaria1333
      @kidaria1333 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@gazza595 Back in the days germany DIDN'T EXISTED for godness sake. Only many different smaller kingdoms and counties speaking the german language but you cannot call this germany and judge it as one. It is like calling scotland and whole Britain english because of speaking the english language. This is nonsense. Only very short time a united german imperial empire existed under prussian dominance from 1871 till 1918. The last real king of direct german/hanoveranian hertiage on the british throne has been George I 1714 and because of that his son George II 1727. And thanks to the royal inheritance rules the titles have stayed german while the members themselves have been born and raised in britain. Calling the royal family such a long timer later german is rubbish. After that logic lots of britans should be labeled germans because of their anglo-saxon origins.
      The smaller different german speaking kingdoms have been often choosen for marriage for the royal families of bigger powerful monarchies to avoid political tension, too direct incest and specific for Britain because of religious denomination.

    • @paulireland9899
      @paulireland9899 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@gazza595 👍👌

  • @studywithmir1994
    @studywithmir1994 2 ปีที่แล้ว +46

    "Not all germans are good ppl" what a brilliant mind.... he just makes me happy.

  • @utterlyawesomevideos7993
    @utterlyawesomevideos7993 8 ปีที่แล้ว +892

    Bloody hell! The man is German, speaking his second language, and he's far more eloquent in his vocabulary than I am!

    • @ztrinx1
      @ztrinx1 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Well, aren't you shit ;)

    • @ABC-td7zm
      @ABC-td7zm 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      UtterlyAwesomeVideos I Know!!

    • @BillyBBone
      @BillyBBone 5 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      I was going to say the exact same thing! "Let's abolish the royal family and give them the benefit of upward social mobility." That's David Mitchell-level rhetorics there!

    • @fisherking7798
      @fisherking7798 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Native English speakers are sooo easily impressed

    • @stuckupcurlyguy
      @stuckupcurlyguy 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      well once you speak a language it's not too hard to absorb some of the idiolect and sayings ... learning to say "them people" etc is just as hard as saying "those people"

  • @MarkLucasProductions
    @MarkLucasProductions 10 ปีที่แล้ว +452

    Henning time and again proves himself to be a comic genius, have a razor sharp wit and be a brilliant conversationalist - I just think he always falls short when doing stand-up. I really love him on panel shows. Not sure why he just doesn't cut it in stand-up.

    • @Edu-fu8oc
      @Edu-fu8oc 10 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      Probably something about it being harder to have a monologue in a foreign language. At least in panel shows, you get a little help. I mean, there's a reason most stand-up comedians are from the UK or the US.

    • @mystrugle900
      @mystrugle900 8 ปีที่แล้ว +41

      +Mark Lucas I feel the same way about Sean Lock

    • @TheHeroofCourage
      @TheHeroofCourage 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      +Edu Or Australia, mate

    • @mikedevaney3507
      @mikedevaney3507 7 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      R Ward yeah true Sean is brilliant on shows but his stand up is average

    • @synchc
      @synchc 6 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      i honestly think hes just lazy and cbb slaving over that much material. its hard work to come up with one plus hours worth of solid comedy. his stand up in glasgow, i forget the venue and date, was among the best ive ever seen. very funny, very clever and played the crowds expectations back and forth like it was childs play.

  • @tuxedobike4067
    @tuxedobike4067 2 ปีที่แล้ว +248

    I feel for the lone voice in the audience who cheered at "abolish the monarchy".

    • @hairyairey
      @hairyairey 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@broceliandeforest7420 Or did they clap because this is a comedy show? Hard to tell.

    • @UserName-br5zu
      @UserName-br5zu 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@broceliandeforest7420 It’s fake crowd noise genius

    • @dan4856
      @dan4856 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I get judged alot because I tend to have a literal complete open mind as well of being somewhat of a natural-set stoic type. I think the Queen took it to the grave. She beared it out, had Human moments of error and Victories during Her span and personally shunned complaining, which as a German Myself, is one of the cores of Our Traditional culture-set and values. But still, It unfortunately *did* find itself into places She had those Human errors. She was overall a Queen Who Personally wanted to empower Women to a Modern era set to boom into drastic change. She Personally got Herself into the Army because She *wanted* to, When Europe was Plunged into great war. Now that's saying something.

    • @marksykes1191
      @marksykes1191 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@dan4856What a load of Botox , she used taxpayers money to prevent her paedophile son from facing justice …….defend that if you dare !

    • @l3eatalphal3eatalpha
      @l3eatalphal3eatalpha ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ​@@UserName-br5zu
      It's not most of the time in the UK.

  • @MrJayehawk
    @MrJayehawk 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    "Well, not ALL Germans are good people"
    Oh my God, I'm crying! HAHAHAHA

    • @johnnyblaze6708
      @johnnyblaze6708 หลายเดือนก่อน

      He obviously knows my mother.

  • @badninja1971
    @badninja1971 2 ปีที่แล้ว +43

    And the two English ‘luvvies’ who one day hope to get an MBE/OBE are very uncomfortable. 😂😂😂

  • @NilsAlbertsson
    @NilsAlbertsson 6 ปีที่แล้ว +175

    Just reading the news today, and it's all about Harry's official engagement photoshoot, and how his new bit of fluff's dress cost £56 thousand, paid for by the taxpayer, because it was an "official" photoshoot.... *56 grand FOR A FUCKING FROCK - ONE FUCKING FROCK!!!* Meanwhile, back at the UK's foodbanks and soup kitchens.....

    • @JoeZUGOOLA
      @JoeZUGOOLA 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Dont you like the frock?

    • @SamuelBlack84
      @SamuelBlack84 3 ปีที่แล้ว +29

      They're just some spoiled, arrogant family rich and powerful only by our hard-earned cash. What function do they serve? Why should we hold them up to the highest esteem? A family with money. Big deal

    • @AndrewOliverHome
      @AndrewOliverHome 3 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      I don’t care how much the dress cost. I care that royalty stand for all the divisions in our society, from the public school system to the House of Lords and the pollution of our political system with state religion. The royal family sit at the top of the whole stinking pile.

    • @SamuelBlack84
      @SamuelBlack84 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@AndrewOliverHome It just shows that money and power rule over all

    • @pseudonayme7717
      @pseudonayme7717 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      @@SamuelBlack84 So nice to hear someone else who understands how silly and outdated the royal family are. If only everyone in the UK felt that way😑

  • @rainerfantasie9573
    @rainerfantasie9573 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    "Ahh once or twice" really makes this clip.

  • @DaveDangerous74
    @DaveDangerous74 10 ปีที่แล้ว +361

    It's so strange, the guests clearly feel uncomfortable with the subject.
    Almost scared.

    • @romford28
      @romford28 10 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Caroline Quentin looks almost in need of medical attention!

    • @DaveDangerous74
      @DaveDangerous74 10 ปีที่แล้ว +61

      Tony Dot There is clearly some sort of fear there. It's like the type of fear people have in North Korea of their leaders.
      It's strange because these types are always against racism, privilege and inequality.
      Yet they for the royal family.
      Something clearly isn't right here.

    • @romford28
      @romford28 10 ปีที่แล้ว +38

      DaveDangerous74 Not so much fear of their leaders as fear of their peers and of not being seen to conform to establishment norms. After all stick your head above the parapet and you could get your career blown off!

    • @TheMikeyReilly
      @TheMikeyReilly 10 ปีที่แล้ว +88

      DaveDangerous74 Interesting to note. Because when Kim Jong-Ill died, we all scoffed at how ridiculous it was people in Korea were crying over his death. "Look at those brainwashed people crying at the death of their unelected leader none of them have ever met or could ever hope to meet. How ludicrous". Yet when it's the exact same scenario with Diana or the Queen Mother, people are out in the streets openly weeping, or being whipped up into a frenzy over a Royal Wedding. Who are the brainwashed ones again?

    • @DaveDangerous74
      @DaveDangerous74 10 ปีที่แล้ว +31

      TheMikeyReilly Yes there is a similarity between North Korea and the UK. But it's strange because it goes against some very clear beliefs that this crowd of people have.
      For example. If you want a job cleaning toilets you have to fill out an equal opportunity form.
      This form asks for your race, religion, gender and even the type of sex you like to have.
      They are really hot on the idea of any group cheating their way into a job cleaning toilets for a living.
      Yet the people who get the top jobs, get them, just for being related to the Queen. You never hear a word said against it.

  • @attackpatterndelta8949
    @attackpatterndelta8949 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    “Have you Michael?”
    “Once or twice.”

  • @DaveDexterMusic
    @DaveDexterMusic 7 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    That shocked hush was fucking pathetic.

  • @robertbedford7978
    @robertbedford7978 3 ปีที่แล้ว +69

    The man is a legend and I agree with everything he said

  • @ioanj86
    @ioanj86 5 ปีที่แล้ว +31

    "here's everything"
    "hokay den"

  • @etreg4927
    @etreg4927 5 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Upward social mobility. Awesome.

  • @jadsenelrin441
    @jadsenelrin441 3 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    I'm with him on this, parasites freeloaders , spoungers ,

    • @heliotropezzz333
      @heliotropezzz333 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      *spongers, or have you just made up a new composite word from spongers and scroungers?

    • @jameshaywood878
      @jameshaywood878 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      And that's their best features.

  • @phon6932
    @phon6932 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    "Come on they're my lot I can make fun of them"

  • @GodConsciousness
    @GodConsciousness 8 ปีที่แล้ว +91

    Frank lobbed out another side splitter when he, after sounding out Prince Philip's full German surname, cleverly inserted M's 1979 hit "Pop Muzik". Dammit Frank, that nearly KILLED me! Genius!

    • @alicedoors4826
      @alicedoors4826 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Am I too young, too old, or too American to get the joke?

    • @johnmartinez7440
      @johnmartinez7440 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@alicedoors4826 Listen to the song and work it out

    • @owlanonymous
      @owlanonymous 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@alicedoors4826 The song features such deeply poetic lyrics as "Try some, buy some, Fe, fi, foe, fum" and other borderline nonsense lyrics, always launching into the refrain of "Talk about, Pop muzik" and "New York, London, Paris, Munich, Everybody talk about pop muzik."
      U2 used a version of it as ironic walk-in music also.

    • @slyasleep
      @slyasleep 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      didn‘t miss a beat, literally. Well done to him.

  • @rabbitss11
    @rabbitss11 6 ปีที่แล้ว +42

    that is one of the subtler reasons for banning the monarchy I have heard, good one Henning

  • @peterbedford380
    @peterbedford380 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Funny but he absolutely nailed it

  • @NibberKSmooth
    @NibberKSmooth 4 ปีที่แล้ว +32

    Every word he has said here is accurate.

    • @brettb9194
      @brettb9194 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      yes, Kaiser Wilhelm II was Queen Victoria's grandson (one of her other granddaughters was the Romanov consort, ended up down a mine shaft riddled with bullets, oh well)

    • @johnnyoranges
      @johnnyoranges 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@brettb9194 Sounds very fitting, tho headchopping would be more traditional.

    • @kidaria1333
      @kidaria1333 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@brettb9194 And? All big royal families are related to each other.

  • @jo_winston
    @jo_winston 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    This aged perfectly

  • @T800System
    @T800System 8 ปีที่แล้ว +354

    the fact that, in 2014, the mere notion of abolishing an institution of hereditary power and privilege whereby one family is subsidised at a public cost of hundreds of millions of pounds per year is met with gasps and almost unanimous disapproval is something to despair at.

    • @SirPetterTheFirst
      @SirPetterTheFirst 8 ปีที่แล้ว +30

      +T800System You have no Idea what you are talking about, They own all the land In Great Britain and are renting it to the UK government in exchange for a fix salary. With all the Building they Upkeep they bring the UK a enormous amount of tourist. The money they make the UK earn way more money they get from the government for the land they rent

    • @T800System
      @T800System 8 ปีที่แล้ว +42

      SirPetterTheFirst Oh, because they "own all the land" that suddenly makes it okay? What you just said is built on such flimsy logic I'm not even going to bother to refute it. The fact that you can't see the gaping hole in it yourself is bad enough.

    • @T800System
      @T800System 8 ปีที่แล้ว +53

      ahafsajdfnsks 1. How do you know they make "700 million" through tourism? Do you have any concrete empirical way of demonstrating this? No, you don't. You can't tell me with absolute certainty that a single penny of the money spent on visiting royalist attractions/buying royalist merchandise would not have been collected if we did not have a sitting monarch. I'll let you in on a secret: the palaces will still be there regardless of whether there is a monarch to occupy them. The rich history of monarchy in this country will still exist regardless of whether we presently have one. What do you think is more appealing to tourists? Letting them venture into Buckingham Palace on a whirlwind tour, or making them stand outside its gates?
      2. The welfare system is designed to help people who need it. If you think that our entire unemployment benefit is spent on people who are "too lazy to work" then you're delusional. People who are out of work and are struggling to find it deserve our patronage - one family already dripping in gold does not.

    • @dannywaite10
      @dannywaite10 8 ปีที่แล้ว +38

      +ahafsajdfnsks 1. Unless you can demonstrate survey data specifically indicating that people visit castles *purely because* there are royals living in them, then that argument is totally unfounded. Firstly from a logical basis - the Queen and Duke of Edinburgh can only occupy one castle at a time, so I think it's highly unlikely that 5.8m people followed them around as they moved between their homes. Secondly, I would bet you hands down that far more people would go to Buckingham Palace, Windsor Castle, Balmoral etc if they could walk around virtually every single room whenever they liked. They could see where royals slept, ate, relaxed etc, check out the absolutely enormous art collections - with no restrictions, all year 'round. Meaning you could get more people through the proverbial door in the first place anyway, thus boosting tourism income. Look at Versailles - uninhabited and thus open to visitors, and it garnered 7.5m visitors vs Windsor's 1.3m (www.travelandleisure.com/slideshows/worlds-most-visited-castles). Indeed, all bar two on that list of the top 20 are uninhabited. Surprise surprise. Therefore, I would bet you that a large proportion, though not all, of tourism revenue in the UK would have come anyway if the royals weren't there - along with a lot more besides.
      What's even more relevant is that Windsor Castle, the most visited of the royal properties with its 1.3m visitors, would come in only at number 23 on a list of most visited tourist attractions in the UK. Stonehenge, the Natural History Museum, and even Chester Zoo get more visitors than that annually (www.alva.org.uk/details.cfm?p=423). So really, their impact on tourism revenue isn't even that great in the first place.
      2. On the topic of "they own all the land" - a lot of that is property of the Crown Estate - and thus belongs neither to the monarchy, nor the government, but is public land - i.e. it belongs to the UK. As such, they don't do anything towards the maintenance of this land, or the management of its assets, and the revenue goes to the Treasury. Check the Crown Estate Act 1961 for the details. Anyway, it makes you wonder why they're even needed at all, given that it's public land and they're not getting the money from it.
      The remaining parts belong either to the Duchies of Cornwall or Lancaster - in essence, large corporations owned by the sitting Duke of Cornwall and monarch respectively, to give them a private source of income. Now, people inherit businesses all the time from parents/grandparents etc, so that bit I have no problem with. However, these people are supposed to register their businesses, to pay corporation tax on their earnings, and they don't get to influence government in a secret and unaccountable manner with a veto over anything that would threaten their interests. All very different for the royals. Of course, some other people do get away with not doing these things and dodging tax etc, which is all the more reason for the government to start closing tax loopholes, though they seem rather hesitant on this...I can guess why but that's another matter.
      3. It does lead on nicely to the next issue of how much we pay in benefits versus how much we pay the royals. If you're worried about the deficit, then it's worth remembering that tax loopholes lose far more money than does the provision of benefits to people in this country. At least some (I'd go so far as saying the vast majority of) benefits go to people who genuinely need help - the disabled, single parents etc, whereas tax loopholes just make the super rich even richer. And that includes the royals. And on the top of how much we pay them (and let's be honest - for doing basically nothing) - for a start, the quoted figures of x amount of pennies per household are unrepresentative, as the royals conveniently always forget to leave out the cost of their security in their figures, which is by far the biggest expense. But also, framing it as x amount per household is also misleading - because it adds up to millions and millions. Money, along with Duchy revenue and increased Crown Estate revenue that could be better spent on things like the NHS, education, policing - public services in dire need of funding. So if you're worried about the deficit, or you just care about public services, it makes sense to get rid of the royals.
      4. On the last point, touched on earlier, about luck of the draw with inheritance. As I said, I have less of a problem with this in principal when it just comes to money. But when it's about a privileged standing in society, influence over government policy, a strange idea that they're somehow better or superior or more important than any other person, purely by accident of birth and through no merit of their own - that isn't acceptable. And to compare that to whether someone is born disabled, or attractive, or intelligent is a ridiculous comparison. The difference is that those attributes are natural - a monarchical system is entirely man-made, and thus we could, and in my view, should, do something about it. Plus, to take away that standing is hardly "punishing" them - they'd then just be like any other rich family in this country, but without the unearned power and influence. I won't go into the part of the debate centred around democratic principles, or we'll be here all day...
      On a far more upbeat note - Henning is awesome.

    • @nestorsdragon8057
      @nestorsdragon8057 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      They bring in sub 1 billion, and in excess of half a billion. It's not worth anything

  • @walkingfoetus6091
    @walkingfoetus6091 8 ปีที่แล้ว +262

    The German speaks sense

    • @QemeH
      @QemeH 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      ...is a sentence you don't hear often in the UK. :D

  • @chipsthedog1
    @chipsthedog1 4 ปีที่แล้ว +60

    How great would it be if the royal family lost all the money and property etc. And then make a reality TV show of how they get on living on a council estate with proper jobs. Now I hate reality shows but I'd watch that

    • @bebobism
      @bebobism 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Sssooohhh , you're not a fan !?
      I'm Dutch and I hate royalty , please to meet you. 😁

    • @bananasstuff3344
      @bananasstuff3344 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Just leave it. Nothing your going to be able to do.

    • @bebobism
      @bebobism 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@bananasstuff3344 Where is a will there's a way.

    • @jeremyhowell8235
      @jeremyhowell8235 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Read 'Queen Camilla' by Sue Townsend. That's exactly the scenario.

    • @chipsthedog1
      @chipsthedog1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@jeremyhowell8235 oh wow I will check it out, I loved the Adrian mole series

  • @bebobism
    @bebobism 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Hahaha , like a rehabilitation for the overprivaliged.
    That's rich ! . . . excuse the pun. 😁

  • @devanman7920
    @devanman7920 7 ปีที่แล้ว +63

    haha love Henning! such a German way to analysis the royal family

  • @marcuscuscus
    @marcuscuscus 3 ปีที่แล้ว +28

    Agree with everything, except the idea that there’s any social mobility here lmao

    • @Bob3D2000
      @Bob3D2000 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Come on, there's some. People occasionally win the lottery...

    • @donaloflynn
      @donaloflynn 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Surely Michael Ball perfectly exemplifies British social mobility? Coming from a humble background both he and his father became very successful people. According to Wikipedia, his maternal grandfather was a coalminer and his father started as an apprentice in a car factory and worked his way up to becoming a top motor industry executive. His parents won't have been wealthy when he was a young child.

    • @alicequayle4625
      @alicequayle4625 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Sounds like Michael Ball's dad was socially mobile back in about the 50s 60s 70s when there actually was a lot of social mobility. Before the ladder got kicked away in the 80s.

    • @brmbkl
      @brmbkl ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@alicequayle4625 spot on. People always use old examples to debate that idea, and forget that the babyboom generation is an exception, not the rule.

  • @NibberKSmooth
    @NibberKSmooth 7 ปีที่แล้ว +63

    Apart from extraordinary snobbery, arrogance, elitism and an outdated sense of both imperialism and privilege, why is there so much resistance about abolishing the monarchy?

    • @heliotropezzz333
      @heliotropezzz333 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Qniba Chaos. For fear of something worse taking its place. We could end up with a Trump.

    • @fds7476
      @fds7476 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      For the same reason people would be against banning Christmas or jewellery.
      It may be a little bit of a luxury, but it's _nice_ to have around and completely harmless.

    • @Madgemulligan
      @Madgemulligan 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      New Thought Oh

    • @1man1bike1road
      @1man1bike1road 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      after brexxit there days might be numbered who knows maybe something good will come out of it lol

    • @mnhay27
      @mnhay27 5 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      @@heliotropezzz333 why would anything need to take the place of the monarchy? If it was abolished nothing of importance would need to change at all. We just stop giving them our money, put into something that actually matters, and carry on with our democracy.

  • @lesleymetthews4590
    @lesleymetthews4590 5 ปีที่แล้ว +39

    Harry could easily make it to middle management lol

    • @collinslfc
      @collinslfc 5 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      *William, Harry was working in the garage.

    • @indaadams9912
      @indaadams9912 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      No, he said Harry could work in a garage and William could get into middle management..

    • @pineapplepenumbra
      @pineapplepenumbra 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@collinslfc Who cares?
      The only reason I remember their names and which one is the oldest is because, by sheer coincidence, my girlfriend's mother had 2 dogs and first, older dog I met was called William, and then years later she got one called Harry.

    • @collinslfc
      @collinslfc 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@pineapplepenumbra Thanks for sharing that...

    • @pineapplepenumbra
      @pineapplepenumbra 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@collinslfc It illustrates a point. You don't have to read any TH-cam comments longer than a line, if you don't want to.

  • @stephenbrookes7268
    @stephenbrookes7268 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    He is welcome to have the Royal Family back!

    • @kidaria1333
      @kidaria1333 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      they are born and raised in britain except Philip. Only the titles are german.

    • @LdevArt
      @LdevArt 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@kidaria1333 you are wrong. their ancestory is saxe coburg gotha and battenberg. that is their real name. they changed it to windsor to fool fawners like you

  • @jibjab351
    @jibjab351 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    If Hennings eyes were further apart they would be in different countries.

  • @LiamEFC.
    @LiamEFC. 8 ปีที่แล้ว +49

    I love this man. I want to be best friends with him.

    • @georgemorley1029
      @georgemorley1029 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Well not all Germans are good people, you know.

  • @thedudeabides3294
    @thedudeabides3294 6 ปีที่แล้ว +55

    1:24
    The most original joke I have ever heard

    • @rugaritolager7411
      @rugaritolager7411 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      i don’t get it please explain

    • @notthere83
      @notthere83 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That kind of makes it sound like it's not true and yet... there he is: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_of_Gl%C3%BCcksburg#United_Kingdom

    • @rheahayes3149
      @rheahayes3149 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      HENNING IS HILARIOUS!! CHEERS FROM 🇨🇦

    • @johnmartinez7440
      @johnmartinez7440 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@rugaritolager7411 It's riffing on the lyrics to a famous 1979 pop song called "Pop Muzik". Frank's exchanged the words "New York, London, Paris, Munich - Everybody talk about pop muzik" with the wordy historic family name of Prince Philip.

  • @fifaRAWR
    @fifaRAWR 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    He knew.

  • @Pumbear
    @Pumbear 7 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    @1:24
    Fucking love that joke.

  • @roberttill3787
    @roberttill3787 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Just seeing this today, the topic of the Royal Family finding jobs rings strangely familiar.

  • @j1bc
    @j1bc 3 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    this guy get`s it spot on every time!

  • @bookl0ver
    @bookl0ver 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Agree with Henning wholeheartedly. We're brainwashed into worshipping these people who really don't do much and get all of the privileges, whilst thousands have less than nothing.

    • @Isleofskye
      @Isleofskye 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Less than nothing?
      You know sometimes we should stop and reflect and not take things for granted....
      I always thought I was hard done by and unlucky having nothing but, at least,I am better off than those you mention who have less than nothing...

    • @kidaria1333
      @kidaria1333 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      People always search for ideal figures to identify with them.

  • @dickyboyryw
    @dickyboyryw 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Henning is totally right. The house of
    Sax Coburg Gotha has ruled the British empire since 1901. When Edward VII took the throne. Forget the "Windsor" rubbish. Its a German Royal House. Our queen's paternal 2x Great grand was Albert. Duke/whatever, of Coburg. For 120 years the Krauts have ruled. That will ONLY end, when Elizabeth II passes away. The we have a Greek House..

    • @PHDiaz-vv7yo
      @PHDiaz-vv7yo 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Greek only by virtue that they needed a royal family at that time. All the bloodlines still come from duchies and tiny kingdoms of the Holy Roman Empire

    • @pineapplepenumbra
      @pineapplepenumbra 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@PHDiaz-vv7yo It's long past time when they should have been abolished.
      There's nothing "holy" about the Roman Empire.

    • @celtspeaksgoth7251
      @celtspeaksgoth7251 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      It goes back further than 120 years. Try 300, when George I of Hanover was made King of England. All European royalty boasted a Germanic element in those days. It was the "thing". Catherine the Great of Russia - German. Marie Antoinette - Austrian. The Hapsburgs of Austria ruled Hungary, the Balkans and intermarried into the Spanish household.

    • @kidaria1333
      @kidaria1333 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Nonesense only the inherited titles are german, the people themselve are born in Britain except Phillip.

    • @kidaria1333
      @kidaria1333 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@celtspeaksgoth7251 Had nothing do to with a "thing" but simply to choose fitting marriages not endagering political power situation thanks to holy roman empire structure with lots of smaller kingdoms. Also the whole "german" culture identity structure is not proper taught anywhere not even in modern country germany. Marie Antoinette was austrian not german. George I was a hanoveranian not a german. German is only the language. It is like saying Maria Stuart was english instead of scotish only because she speaks english. Modern germany should have be named "untited states of germany" and not "federal republic germany"often only called germany. It is a wrong concept. There was never the one germany and the one german culture. SImilar to the british empire.

  • @cidercik
    @cidercik 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Totally agree.

  • @martinfairclough3581
    @martinfairclough3581 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Yes my spelling is shit and it wont inprove coz im dislexic but yes i am against the royal family .

  • @kategreat87dowdall36
    @kategreat87dowdall36 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Please 🙏 please take them back

  • @philjamieson5572
    @philjamieson5572 2 ปีที่แล้ว +28

    I think Henning is a genuinely witty guy.

  • @christinenightingale336
    @christinenightingale336 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Shame we would rather disrespect anything in life now rather than be nice!🇬🇧

    • @kevinreay1510
      @kevinreay1510 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Get your tongue out of their arses.

  • @samuelrobinson1992
    @samuelrobinson1992 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Anyone who watched this video should read Sue Townsend's novel 'The Queen and I", it's brilliant!!

  • @m4rt3rnus
    @m4rt3rnus 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    im not sure why youtube recommends this, the day after Prince Phillip died? :D

    • @pineapplepenumbra
      @pineapplepenumbra 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      He died 8 months ago, and that's when I got this recommended.

    • @charcolew
      @charcolew 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It couldn't possibly be because it was relevant or topical, could it? Surely not!

  • @georgejonesthestarseeds77
    @georgejonesthestarseeds77 2 ปีที่แล้ว +36

    He's not the only one who hates the royal family 😁😁

    • @ThatPianoNoob
      @ThatPianoNoob ปีที่แล้ว

      Im just sad nobody said the obvious "but the royal family isnt jewish!?"

  • @The-Sea-Dragon-1977
    @The-Sea-Dragon-1977 2 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    I love how Skinner's scripted joke looks so flat compared to Henning's dry humour.

    • @georgemorley1029
      @georgemorley1029 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      It was funny because it was base. Henning was funny because he got inside a situation in an unexpected and surprisingly accurate way. I love them both.

  • @Professicchio
    @Professicchio 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Henning was definitely being prescient in regard of Harry.......

  • @timheathfield2261
    @timheathfield2261 5 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Good old Henning our sort of guy !!

  • @RefinedRouge
    @RefinedRouge 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    You can always criticise your own family

  • @IIIIIIIIIIIIIIPKIIIIIIIIIIIIII
    @IIIIIIIIIIIIIIPKIIIIIIIIIIIIII 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Feel a bit awkward for Henning here and the way he is received ... And who the fucks he sharing the panel with?
    Did they mess up the bookings???

  • @eivindkaisen6838
    @eivindkaisen6838 5 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    The Schleswig-Holstein-Sonderborg-Glyckborg family is NOT German: It is the family name of the ‘royals’ in Denmark, Norway, and Greece, where Philip comes from.

    • @NC-hu3ti
      @NC-hu3ti 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      German in origin. Descendants of Queen Victoria and Prince Albert

    • @eivindkaisen6838
      @eivindkaisen6838 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@NC-hu3ti Not really. The Danish royals claim to be much older than Victoria and Albert; they are descendants at least from Christian III (1534-1559). The interbreeding within the royal families in Europe is quite astonishing: For instance, Princess Dagmar (b. 1847) was (as Maria Feodorovna) married to no less than two Russian Czars (Alexander III and Nicolay I) and mother to Czar Nicolay II, and was the sister of Britain’s Queen Alexandra, whose daughter Maude became queen of Norway by marriage to her cousin Prince Carl of Denmark (as Haakon VII). So they were realated but not descendants.
      Scheswig and Holstein were Danish royal dukedoms until the Dano-Prussian war of 1864, and then on and off until the borders were finalized in 1920.

    • @skyblazeeterno
      @skyblazeeterno 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Schleswig-Holstein-Sonderborg-Glyckborg - as pub landlord Al Murray would say nice fine British name..lol

    • @HellaGust
      @HellaGust 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@eivindkaisen6838 Even when obviously correct, any claim made about German-ness and royals suddenly sounds waaay more dubious coming from Prince Ludwig the Indestructible.

    • @eivindkaisen6838
      @eivindkaisen6838 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@HellaGust Now, if could juuuust get ze voice right.

  • @Henricus.
    @Henricus. 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Me too! 😊🤗🇩🇪♥️

  • @censusgary
    @censusgary 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    “Not all Germans are good people.”
    Precisely.

  • @williamgoss4691
    @williamgoss4691 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    A German with a (brilliantly dry), sense of humour !!

    • @herindoors3694
      @herindoors3694 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      German, sense of humour: contradictio in terminis!

  • @markashdown1314
    @markashdown1314 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great laugh.

  • @Ana_crusis
    @Ana_crusis 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    clip needs to be longer...

  • @patmaughan37
    @patmaughan37 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Tough. The rest of the country (most of them) like them. And this person is a foreigner.
    .

    • @patarciepaul
      @patarciepaul 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      What's to like about them?

    • @patmaughan37
      @patmaughan37 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@patarciepaul a lot. I think we should get a president only when somebody gets a good one. And if and it is a big if we do it should not be someone like the american one. I can see no advantage whatsoever in ditching the real thing for a naff imitation. And how much do all these pop and film star so called princesses etc. cost? In

    • @kidaria1333
      @kidaria1333 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      No it is very divided. Like or hate them. Not much inbetween.

    • @patmaughan37
      @patmaughan37 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Its a great pity that foreigners who have somewhere else to go if they dont like aspects of our country feel free to comment on things they dont like about it. They can always go back home or else park themselves on one of the very many republics which infest the world. And when the countries of the commonwealth decide to ditch us can we please see an end to immigration. After all, when their own countries are republics there is really no need., is there. I am trying to get a question mark here, but my device will not let me.

  • @MrMufc11
    @MrMufc11 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    FFS!! Don't mention the damn war

  • @rogerdecoursey8341
    @rogerdecoursey8341 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Hes not funny along with skinner

  • @lonewanderer3456
    @lonewanderer3456 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I f only they had listened and put them in to 101 before King Charlie.

  • @johnmckee7640
    @johnmckee7640 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Harry could get a job at a garage.. He was so right.. He could now..

    • @pineapplepenumbra
      @pineapplepenumbra 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ripping people off, you mean? So basically not that different to being a royal?

    • @ZesPak
      @ZesPak 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@pineapplepenumbra Tbh Henning's point is valid here. They are born with everything. Imagine being born into such wealth and fame, literally every step recorded and criticized. Can't chose who you date, can't really pick a profession, extremely hard to prove you're worth anything beyond your title. And again, not by choice, just by "chance".

    • @pineapplepenumbra
      @pineapplepenumbra 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@ZesPak Oh yes, I totally agree. That's another reason to abolish the monarchy.

  • @shmookins
    @shmookins 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I never heard Wehn speak German, and I couldn't find a video of it (probably because I can only search in English).

    • @TheMsBellatrice
      @TheMsBellatrice 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      he talks to a guy in the audience during a Live at the Apollo performance

    • @janethockey9070
      @janethockey9070 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Shadow Heart At the beginning of stand up. He asks a fellow German where he was from

  • @donaloflynn
    @donaloflynn 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I like Michael Ball a lot, but I don't understand his discomfort and almost defensiveness here. As an ordinary guy who has used his talents and work ethic to reach a high echelon of British society, surely he's perfectly placed to see how wrong it is that one absurdly privileged family are glorified by a large proportion of the British population for simply existing?

  • @tjfSIM
    @tjfSIM 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Michael Ball looks like Ricky Grover here - I was worried he was going to kick off!

  • @cdchantler
    @cdchantler 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This guy rocks 👍

  • @mike_van_in
    @mike_van_in 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The sloth from Ice Age - with a Churmin accent.

  • @yokelo7
    @yokelo7 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Already liked Henning but after this I like him way more

  • @MEEEPMEEEPMEEEPMEEEP
    @MEEEPMEEEPMEEEPMEEEP ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I like the "not all germans are good people" but
    1:24 the pop muzik joke had me in tears

  • @lucabrasi3964
    @lucabrasi3964 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Let them pay for themselves

  • @Isleofskye
    @Isleofskye 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Das ist sehr wahr, mein Freund. Der germanische Einfluss ist in der britischen Gesellschaft groß.

  • @DrCrabfingers
    @DrCrabfingers 2 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    I love Henning Wehn...years before he went on TV his radio show 'Henning Knows Best' was my must listen to on Radio 4.... so funny, close to the bone, challenging but always extremely funny. He always takes the most cherished ideals and tears them apart in the most honest and humorous way.

    • @susannamarker2582
      @susannamarker2582 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      A german plant to make us love the EU. Get him out.

    • @pineapplepenumbra
      @pineapplepenumbra 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@susannamarker2582 I can't tell if you're joking or not.

    • @susannamarker2582
      @susannamarker2582 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@pineapplepenumbra I don't need to know what is in your head.

    • @pineapplepenumbra
      @pineapplepenumbra 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@susannamarker2582 "I don't need to know what is in your head."
      Well you certainly know how to make friends and influence people, don't you?

    • @alicequayle4625
      @alicequayle4625 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Cherished myths...

  • @kb9072
    @kb9072 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    I'm with him on this.

  • @saxongreen78
    @saxongreen78 8 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    What a DUDE! Indeed - smash it to atoms...all of it.

    • @TapDancerDood
      @TapDancerDood 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      That would dramatically reduce peadophilia in the UK.

  • @urmaisgay6495
    @urmaisgay6495 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    who is henning vain?

  • @allsearpw3829
    @allsearpw3829 ปีที่แล้ว

    Magic all the way , so quick witted for a German .

  • @hughphillips1427
    @hughphillips1427 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Better to put Henning Wehn in room 101, the plum.

  • @TheHutchy01
    @TheHutchy01 7 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Well as an another Anglo-German he has more right to complain than us

  • @Tony-rw4qv
    @Tony-rw4qv ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Yes, let's abolish them and good riddance

  • @possumGFX
    @possumGFX 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Henning Wehn looks like he is wearing some other persons face.

    • @DeuPKay
      @DeuPKay 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      So does the royal family.

  • @davewilson4058
    @davewilson4058 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    The monarchy is an anachronism in this modern world, but what alternative is there? If the U.K. became a Republic, you could end up with an English Donald Trump. Can you imagine Boris being in charge. Wait a minute, he is!!!

  • @leejohnson3209
    @leejohnson3209 8 ปีที่แล้ว +71

    The worst thing about this Tory government is they've got us all fighting for an NHS, workers rights and decent wages when they should be a given in 2016. Right now we should be moving forward and discussing getting rid of the anachronism that is the Royal Family. We've regressed.

    • @leejohnson3209
      @leejohnson3209 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      +Leslie Graham she doesn't stay out of politics and I really see no distinction between a PM and president. I'd just get rid of the royal family and have a written constitution.

    • @saxongreen78
      @saxongreen78 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Right on, bruv - and commiserations on BRexit.

    • @saxongreen78
      @saxongreen78 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      +Leslie Graham "She has never on any single occasion in the last 60 odd years ever voiced a political opinion on any subjext ever." - an unfounded and ill-lettered lie...what planet are you on? I live in Australia - and in 1975, the Queen's representative in Australia, the Gov. General, summarily removed a democratically elected PM (Whitlam) during peacetime. That's just one...and it's too massive to even bother with the rest. Gooseberry.

    • @saxongreen78
      @saxongreen78 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ***** :-) What an arrogant self-important fellow you are...you'd fit right in with the Windsors!
      OK - I'll explain it to you in plain, kitchen English. A GG is a political instrument of the Queen. When the GG acts, he acts on behalf of the fucking Queen. Which bit escapes your cognition?

    • @saxongreen78
      @saxongreen78 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      :-) Blocked, you say? *fistpump* Woo Hoo!

  • @carlrenshaw3649
    @carlrenshaw3649 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    In this day and age where everything you say and do is deemed as racist, if i turned around and said " i want the job as King, I'll do a better job of it." I'll be told " No, you're not allowed, you've got the wrong blood." ???????

  • @andrewwalton1520
    @andrewwalton1520 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Don't worry Henning feel sure the vast majority of people including the Royal family don't even know you exist ?

    • @blackphillipppp
      @blackphillipppp 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      And yet he’s probably happier than all of them combined.

  • @jamesswindley9599
    @jamesswindley9599 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Honestly the truth

  • @georgedonaldson7220
    @georgedonaldson7220 7 ปีที่แล้ว +45

    He's spot on.

    • @sunnygirly2k4
      @sunnygirly2k4 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Exactly!

    • @ze89412
      @ze89412 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Only because you agree with him

    • @pineapplepenumbra
      @pineapplepenumbra 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@ze89412 "Only because you agree with him"
      Can you think of any reason not to agree with him?

  • @Sir_Gerald_Nosehairs.
    @Sir_Gerald_Nosehairs. 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    He's not wrong, but he's about as funny as a fire in an orphanage.

  • @declanfaughey8471
    @declanfaughey8471 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Don’t mention the war

  • @petervarone8462
    @petervarone8462 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Me too.

  • @andymackie8283
    @andymackie8283 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Actual LOL

  • @barryjatkinson
    @barryjatkinson ปีที่แล้ว

    We all really know that royalty is wrong.

  • @paulthoresen8241
    @paulthoresen8241 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I don't hate them as individuals, but the systems makes no sense. You can't hope for a meritocracy when your leader is given everything from the start

    • @fds7476
      @fds7476 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Well, they're figureheads.
      They'e not intended to participate in the meritocracy in the first place.

    • @fredh1720
      @fredh1720 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@fds7476 They're basically mascots

  • @hobanagerik
    @hobanagerik 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Get rid of them but only if we can have a Saxon king or queen again.

    • @anonUK
      @anonUK 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Saxon as in Sachsen?

    • @clothilde1623
      @clothilde1623 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      The Saxons originally came from the land that is now Germany, so you’d be replacing one German Royal Family with another.

    • @Isleofskye
      @Isleofskye 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Das ist sehr wahr, mein Freund. Der germanische Einfluss ist in der britischen Gesellschaft groß.

    • @asicdathens
      @asicdathens 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Saxony is in Germany, Anglia is in Denmark. And since 1066 Brits are half French

  • @the_katman2181
    @the_katman2181 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    He's not exactly wrong, is he?

  • @MrBrownnn696
    @MrBrownnn696 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Not all Germens are good people....

  • @daviddowsett1658
    @daviddowsett1658 ปีที่แล้ว

    Classic ... I agree, I carnt wait for these benefit cheats to get thrown (pun intended) out, not only that I would reclaim all assets back into "The Peoples" hands, and they can work like the rest of us if they want to make ends meat, or they can just release a book or something.

  • @stevencassidy6982
    @stevencassidy6982 7 ปีที่แล้ว +40

    I agree with henning. unfortunately they keep breeding

    • @Blitzentine
      @Blitzentine 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Yeah, isn't Middleton on like her third child in five years?! If she wasn't married to a Royal, she'd be called a benefit scrounger.

    • @rebfj86
      @rebfj86 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      They have an average number of children unlike so many on benefits who breed more than they can afford.

    • @rebfj86
      @rebfj86 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Blitzentine if Katherine wasn’t married to a prince she would have a job and be paying for her own kids. Both her parents are hard working people so she wouldn’t be a layabout scrounger like so many who have more kids than they can afford.