Thank you. Very good explanation and helped a lot. So whenever the researcher says he or she is using a regression model to analysis, he is performing a meta-analysis or can a regression model be used for a regular primary study? What is the difference between a regression model approach and a matching method?
A regression model can be used in a primary study. The author of the systematic review can use the results from the primary study in the meta-analysis of systematic review.
I wanna know about Meta-Review...I think it is the review of systematic reviews or meta-analyses....I wanna know what components does its research proposal and thesis consist of?
Does it mean systematic reviews (without meta-analysis) make a conclusion without statistics? I'm a little confused.Thanks very much for your reply. :) :)
Thank you for the video, it really helps to start understanding the difference between lit review and meta-analysis. A question though, I wonder the differences (if exist) between those two methods in terms of the contributions to a field. How do they differ? And what's the first indicator of a good quality meta-analysis paper? Thank you
Good question. Both make a contribution to the field, as best as they can. A systematic review with meta-analysis ranks higher in terms of levels of evidence, than just a systematic review. Review the contents of a systematic review with meta-analysis against the PRISMA checklist.
Tomorrow is my final exam you are a life savior
I hope your exam went well!
Thank you so much . Your explanation is very clear
What is the difference between review paper, systematic review and meta analysis pl? Is the review article also known as a review paper?
Thank you. Very good explanation and helped a lot. So whenever the researcher says he or she is using a regression model to analysis, he is performing a meta-analysis or can a regression model be used for a regular primary study? What is the difference between a regression model approach and a matching method?
A regression model can be used in a primary study. The author of the systematic review can use the results from the primary study in the meta-analysis of systematic review.
I'm not sure what is referred to by "matching method" though. Keep looking for answers. Success will come.
Makes a lot of sense. Thank you 😊
Thank you very much for this clear explanation!
Shukraan ❤.... Well explained 😇
If you are citing mortality analysis of one specific animal lets say snow leopard what type of study is it ?
Well explained
Thank you
Thanks! A question.. which are the regress methods used in a systematic reviews?
That is a great question. I wish I had a good answer for you but I'll need some more info to make sure I answer the question properly :-)
very helpful response, thank you
Well explained
Thank you for this breakdown.
Thanks a lot. Could you advise some programs for meta-analysis ?
Revman is a good one. There are also a few others mentioned here: toptipbio.com/free-meta-analysis-software/ Enjoy the research journey 😀
This is very helpful
Thank You so much!!!
Just made my day
Love u ❤
Many thanks
makes sense! Thanks
I wanna know about Meta-Review...I think it is the review of systematic reviews or meta-analyses....I wanna know what components does its research proposal and thesis consist of?
The JBI Reviewers Manual shows one how to do a systematic review jbi-global-wiki.refined.site/space/MANUAL
Can we include unpublished studies in meta analysis?
You can include any data as long as you are transparent as to what you are including :-)
Thanks you .
Does it mean systematic reviews (without meta-analysis) make a conclusion without statistics? I'm a little confused.Thanks very much for your reply. :) :)
Yes, indeed :-)
Thankyou for making this concept so easy
Thank you for the video, it really helps to start understanding the difference between lit review and meta-analysis. A question though, I wonder the differences (if exist) between those two methods in terms of the contributions to a field. How do they differ? And what's the first indicator of a good quality meta-analysis paper? Thank you
Good question. Both make a contribution to the field, as best as they can. A systematic review with meta-analysis ranks higher in terms of levels of evidence, than just a systematic review. Review the contents of a systematic review with meta-analysis against the PRISMA checklist.
A
Makes alot of sense
very beneficial
Thanku so much
Understandable 🎉
Thanks a lot ❤❤
Is a systematic review the same as a literature review?
Great question. Here's a video that explains the difference th-cam.com/video/Nwp9tkhpLCo/w-d-xo.html
it makes sense
thanks you saved me
I need some help in systematic review
Systematic reviews can be tricky😊
This playlist may help th-cam.com/play/PLo0N0fsKrssVsBUdLIhoAhgxsWlapuJbW.html
South African accent recognisable anywhere in the world ❤
Best recognised by fellow South Africans ❤️
meta ... summary of summaries (papers)
makes sn
es