Why The Tecnam P2010 is Better Than The Cessna 172?

แชร์
ฝัง

ความคิดเห็น • 13

  • @anthonygibson3133
    @anthonygibson3133 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    You can just say "One Seventy Two" the "Hundred" part isn't necessary....

    • @harblz57
      @harblz57 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It's because it's computer-generated, not a human reader. A good reason to downvote the video and block the channel This kind of crap shouldn't be rewarded.

  • @warshrike666
    @warshrike666 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I havn't flown a Cessna yet but i do have 5 hours in a 2005 p92 echo super Tecnam and i love it. Still got a long way to go for my licence but i could not have picked a better plane imo to start with. :)

  • @edsonroadmoto
    @edsonroadmoto ปีที่แล้ว

    Sound clips of it starting and taking off be nice 👀

  • @stew1981
    @stew1981 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I'm assuming this is AI generated info or poor copy and paste to AI reading. This is half describing an addon airplane for flight sim software. Click spots, and PBR materials etc is simulation talk. Mixed with info on the real airplane.

    • @zaelu
      @zaelu ปีที่แล้ว

      Absolutely ridiculous garbage voice over :D :D

  • @LM-47
    @LM-47 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I want real airplane reviews. Not stock photos with some AI narrator.

  • @Spymell
    @Spymell 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    C172 is the King!

  • @kevinphillips9408
    @kevinphillips9408 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Very poor script and the person reading is obviously has no knowledge of aviation. You need to do a lot better

  • @scotabot7826
    @scotabot7826 ปีที่แล้ว

    "Better than the 172", somebody is dreaming, Big Time!!!!! That's funny!

    • @gotchagoing4905
      @gotchagoing4905 ปีที่แล้ว

      Do you mean the Cessna one hundred and seventy two ;}>

    • @riyazmomin9845
      @riyazmomin9845 ปีที่แล้ว

      Jn

    • @warshrike666
      @warshrike666 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Tho i havn't flown a 172 yet i disagree that Tecnam is dreaming. How old is the Cessna design??