At 43:00 The derivation for momentum is not fully understandable as Let sign for row is ¶ And vector v is ¥ And n cap / unit vector n => ñ Then ¶¥ is vector quantity And ¶¥(¥.ñ) is vector(scalar) **BUT** in next step it is ∆.(¶¥¥) What is its significance ?? As far as I know ¥¥ does not signify any number or operation or operator Please clear this doubt 🙏🏻🙏🏻
@@quantabot1165 So do I. Can momentum be totally conserved between linear and angular flow?? Without the use of Newtonian Mechanics we may never know. wouldn't it be awesome if somebody could answer that.
@Multiphase Flows IITG
The Principia
Theorem XXXII
Theorem XXXV are as valid today as when they were written.
Thanks for reading.
At 43:00
The derivation for momentum is not fully understandable as
Let sign for row is ¶
And vector v is ¥
And n cap / unit vector n => ñ
Then ¶¥ is vector quantity
And ¶¥(¥.ñ) is vector(scalar)
**BUT**
in next step it is ∆.(¶¥¥)
What is its significance ??
As far as I know ¥¥ does not signify any number or operation or operator
Please clear this doubt 🙏🏻🙏🏻
Prof : 3 cases Eulerian Lagrangian Newtonian.
can you define what you mean by newtonian?
@@quantabot1165 Where all 3 laws are raised in rank to be axioms and you can differentiate anything except time.
@@factorylad5071 i mean Newtonian as applied to fluid flow analysis
@@quantabot1165 So do I. Can momentum be totally conserved between linear and angular flow?? Without the use of Newtonian Mechanics we may never know. wouldn't it be awesome if somebody could answer that.
46:48
58:29