This injustice was heartbreaking and made me a fan of Foster. Also speaks as to why you shouldn't sign for Top Rank unless it is a last resort. Yes I'm calling conspiracy. His contract was up so they took his title to force his hand. You can't discount this and these guys won't speak of the corrupt practices so I will!
@@gddd6061nah, he didn’t out land Robson by that much, and Robson was the aggressor who dictated the pace of the entire fight. These are factors the judges are required to consider. Foster was the better fighter, but he didn’t come to fight. Foster fought like money mayweather, except foster wasn’t able to dictate the pace like mayweather, nor was his defense nearly as tight as Floyd. But sure, all these internet strangers and washed up fighters are better judges than the professional/trained/seasoned judges 🙄
Paulie knows all too well how this feels when he got screwed by the corrupt judges in Texas against Diaz. In the rematch, Paulie left no questions. I believe the rematch will be the same for Foster.
This was the single worst robbery I’ve seen since I started watching boxing a few years ago… I’m STOKED that Foster gets to redeem himself although he shouldn’t have to… He WON THE FIRST TIME!! But I’m predicting a Knockout! 😤
I always appreciate your UNBIASSED assessments and praise your expertise, in this case I respectfully DO NOT AGREE with your firm conclusion of the "robbery" in their 1st fight though. I personally think there was an OVERREACTION CRYING OUT ROBBERY... possibly enhanced by the US fight commentary and the Compubox stats. Just a few points to address: 1) Most of the "Boxing community" thought Foster won "IN AMERICA"... (with the LOCAL guy) BUT NOT WORLDWIDE. For TV commentators, experts and fans outside the US the general opinion is that it was very DEBATABLE, DISPUTABLE of who should have been the fair winner, because there were many swing rounds, IN A LUCKLUSTER FIGHT with NO CLEAR DOMINANT FIGHTER in which you can favor the cleanest punches by Foster (even though they did not hurt at all) or the volume punches, agression by Conceicao (even though many of those punches landed on the body, guard and shoulders)... 2) If during most of the fight the CROWD was BOOING, and one guy is going forward, throwing punches and trying to engage, being more active and agressive, and the other guy is constantly retreating, avoiding the exchanges and going backwards, WHO DO YOU GUYS THINK THE CROWD IS MAINLY BOOING TO..? So, is it fair to cry out "ROBBERY" when the audience during most of the fight is booing the supposedly "robbed" guy who is, by the way and on top of that, the local guy?' 3) If that was a BORING FIGHT, as most of us may agree, why is this fight deserving of an IMMEDIATE REMATCH..? Hopefully whoever wins the rematch does it in convincing fashion and gets the deserved credit by the general audience. I think a rematch between Conceicao-Navarrte is WAY MORE DESERVING OF A REMATCH than this one, given that it surely was controversial and at the same time, a great battle with big drama and too much HEART! Salute!
@@LionelWatson-ji1bfthe same could be said for his opponent he didn’t land any “effective punches” either so what’s your excuse for him getting an undeserved win? And to rickthomas ydksab so of course you didn’t see a robbery you’re a donkey 😂
@@LionelWatson-ji1bfdude stop it Conceicao was punching air. You can't win a fight when you throw way more punches but get out punched by the other guy. Accumulative damage is a thing. Anybody who understands what EFFECTIVE aggression is knows Foster got robbed.
Damn the rematch !!! The bigger picture is FIX THE FIX n boxing !!! It should Nva HAVE TO BE A REMATCH. This why boxing is frowned upon these days . Great fighters don’t fight other greats and then who ever has the most pull and benefit for boxing wins the fight.
This injustice was heartbreaking and made me a fan of Foster. Also speaks as to why you shouldn't sign for Top Rank unless it is a last resort. Yes I'm calling conspiracy. His contract was up so they took his title to force his hand. You can't discount this and these guys won't speak of the corrupt practices so I will!
Worst robbery I’ve ever witnessed
Maybe the rematch should be held in Japan where the judging is fair.
😂
Robson got robbed so many time that he won the belt via roberry lmao 😭😭😭
Foster got ROBBED 😂. I hope he gets his belt back this time around
He didn’t get robbed. If you are the champ. When win knockout the opponent or show dominance.
@@BETTALIFE101 he did get robbed, you are clueless and blind
@@gddd6061nah, he didn’t out land Robson by that much, and Robson was the aggressor who dictated the pace of the entire fight. These are factors the judges are required to consider. Foster was the better fighter, but he didn’t come to fight. Foster fought like money mayweather, except foster wasn’t able to dictate the pace like mayweather, nor was his defense nearly as tight as Floyd.
But sure, all these internet strangers and washed up fighters are better judges than the professional/trained/seasoned judges 🙄
@@blazesmoothjazz7255Effective aggression means you have to land punches. Being aggressive means nothing if you can't land
@@BETTALIFE101but yet y’all go against your own logic to hate on Crawford vs madrimov ? Like make it make sense 😂smh
I think Shock writes this wrong so fast 🥊
Dude I forgot about this ROBBERY!
Paulie knows all too well how this feels when he got screwed by the corrupt judges in Texas against Diaz. In the rematch, Paulie left no questions. I believe the rematch will be the same for Foster.
This was the single worst robbery I’ve seen since I started watching boxing a few years ago… I’m STOKED that Foster gets to redeem himself although he shouldn’t have to… He WON THE FIRST TIME!! But I’m predicting a Knockout! 😤
Love the show‼️🙏🏽 But start calling it for what it is and was and that’s CORRUPTION😳 Flat out
Robson got some luck for once as he was robbed vs valdez
Has zero to do with this fight, was a blatant robbery
Foster wasn't throwing enough. It was a close fight to me
I always appreciate your UNBIASSED assessments and praise your expertise, in this case I respectfully DO NOT AGREE with your firm conclusion of the "robbery" in their 1st fight though.
I personally think there was an OVERREACTION CRYING OUT ROBBERY... possibly enhanced by the US fight commentary and the Compubox stats. Just a few points to address:
1) Most of the "Boxing community" thought Foster won "IN AMERICA"... (with the LOCAL guy) BUT NOT WORLDWIDE.
For TV commentators, experts and fans outside the US the general opinion is that it was very DEBATABLE, DISPUTABLE of who should have been the fair winner, because there were many swing rounds, IN A LUCKLUSTER FIGHT with NO CLEAR DOMINANT FIGHTER in which you can favor the cleanest punches by Foster (even though they did not hurt at all) or the volume punches, agression by Conceicao (even though many of those punches landed on the body, guard and shoulders)...
2) If during most of the fight the CROWD was BOOING, and one guy is going forward, throwing punches and trying to engage, being more active and agressive, and the other guy is constantly retreating, avoiding the exchanges and going backwards, WHO DO YOU GUYS THINK THE CROWD IS MAINLY BOOING TO..?
So, is it fair to cry out "ROBBERY" when the audience during most of the fight is booing the supposedly "robbed" guy who is, by the way and on top of that, the local guy?'
3) If that was a BORING FIGHT, as most of us may agree, why is this fight deserving of an IMMEDIATE REMATCH..?
Hopefully whoever wins the rematch does it in convincing fashion and gets the deserved credit by the general audience.
I think a rematch between Conceicao-Navarrte is WAY MORE DESERVING OF A REMATCH than this one, given that it surely was controversial and at the same time, a great battle with big drama and too much HEART!
Salute!
Foster should KO him this time
O'shaquie wins the rematch...just don't let it go 12 Shaq...🙏
Facts 💯 I got the fight a Draw
I didn't see a robbery. O'Shaqie was mostly throwing showy pitty-pat punches.
He showed he was the better fighter, but he forgot that you have to land effective punches to win rounds.
@@LionelWatson-ji1bfthe same could be said for his opponent he didn’t land any “effective punches” either so what’s your excuse for him getting an undeserved win? And to rickthomas ydksab so of course you didn’t see a robbery you’re a donkey 😂
Google the closest SVS Vision near you
@@LionelWatson-ji1bfdude stop it Conceicao was punching air. You can't win a fight when you throw way more punches but get out punched by the other guy. Accumulative damage is a thing. Anybody who understands what EFFECTIVE aggression is knows Foster got robbed.
@@ChillConservative2k15 judges disagreed. And that's all that matters.
Shock dominated Conceicao. The first fight wasn't close at all.
Damn the rematch !!! The bigger picture is FIX THE FIX n boxing !!! It should Nva HAVE TO BE A REMATCH. This why boxing is frowned upon these days . Great fighters don’t fight other greats and then who ever has the most pull and benefit for boxing wins the fight.
Worst robbery siince Toney-vs-McCallum. I had Foster winning 11 rounds.
Luta dura cada um pucha o saco para seu país mais sou a favor da revanch