Two years later, we caught up with Anand again! You can watch our conversation about the state of democracy and the art of persuasion here: th-cam.com/video/fTJ5qL9VTWM/w-d-xo.html.
*Anand embodies the impotent rants, of a hypocrite!* Anand, why do you have Facebook account? Anand, why do you have a Twitter account? Anand, why is your book available on Amazon? Anand, do you own a car? Anand, do you own a mobile phone? Anand, do you have your own home, or a mortgage? Anand, were they made in India!!! Anand, where did you get your food from?
@@utubecomment21 He didn’t advocate a revolution to destroy all modernity , he only proposed to tax the rich more, all these things will still be around if you pass the wealth tax. Why are you so freaked out? He only demanded the rich not to be so selfish and greedy, behave more like a normal decent human being.
Every time I hear him, I am amazed, not just by his brilliance, but by his fierce and awesome anger. We are so ready for his call to action. He's just the most articulate of the angry and oppressed.
@@arod1766 his anger is for us and he doesn't have a victim mentality seeing that he comes from the one percent background. You can't be the victim when you're at the top of the pile and he's talking on behalf of us not himself because what he's proposing will financially harm him. You can't say that he has a victim mentality when he is literally advocating for something that will financially harm him.
Anand is easily my new favorite author and I've been thoroughly enjoying hearing/watching him speak as well. He is a gifted orator, writer, analyst, and investigator.
*Anand embodies the impotent rants, of a hypocrite!* Anand, why do you have Facebook account? Anand, why do you have a Twitter account? Anand, why is your book available on Amazon? Anand, do you own a car? Anand, do you own a mobile phone? Anand, do you have your own home, or a mortgage? Anand, were they made in India!!! Anand, where did you get your food from?
Yet somehow taxes have historically always been used as a tool of oppression. The only thing that could potentially make the tax dynamic different was if that tool was held by "the people "and not a ruling elite of rich people. So when was the last time you had any say in how taxes are collected and used ?
chapeau to the interviewer… she was fantastic and at Anand's intellectual level… we don't get to see this very often… Awesome interview… thank you for posting
Thank you for denouncing damn Facebook right off the bat. Hopefully your dream of breaking up that company will come true and people will finally admit that FB is predatory and abusive and has cultural and political power that no corporation should ever have. Bless you, Anand, for your forceful truthfulness. Nothing is more badly needed (especially in Washington DC)!
9:00 Why is this EPIC conversation filmed in the dark? Okay, the Director, the Producer, AND the Lighting guy were stoned? Thank the Gods that the sound engineer was wide awake!
Isnt he Indian? The one with the dot ? Indians with the feather are American Man is a political animal It is clear that the best partnership in a state is the one which operates through the middle people and also that those states in which the middle element is large and stronger if possible than the other two together or at any rate stronger than either of them alone have every chance of a well run constitution Aristotle's, Politics
Robert Mitchell Anand was born in Ohio, raised and educated in US of A. But your right , only Natives are truly “American “ if you want to be technical
The only reason why i watched the whole video is to listen to Anand. He always brings something new to table. His clarity and his explanation is awesome. The lighting is awful. If it was another person , i would have skipped the video.
*Language such as "win-win" to describe a mutually beneficial arrangement is a logical fallacy* . Employing the term, "win", presumes a contest that must, by definition, designate a loser. Where Mr. Giridharadas describes a mutually beneficial arrangement, such as an exchange of goods, he does not account for the exploitation of labor and consumption of resources that contribute to the production of exchange goods. Exploitation for profit relegates the "exploited" as the losers. It seems to me that predatory "thought leaders" are those who likely devised the fallacious "win-win" euphemism. Mr. Giridharadas' writing and speaking engagements are invaluable. Thank you for hosting and producing this event.
Do you know the feeling when you've had all these feelings that made you really angry for so long and then all of a sudden a guy comes around and articulates in 5 mins what you always felt, but failed to grasp? Anand is scratching the most unbearable itch I never knew I had^^
Anand is a great guy. Keep up this terrific work you are doing. Reminds me of the man who in Jack London's 'The Iron Heel' challenges the plutocrats in their lair. An uneven book but helped inspire 1984 as 'The People of the Abyss' inpsired Orwell's 'Down and Out in London and Paris' Only 'People....' is the better book. Jack's best work deserves a new airing.
Yes he needs to be able to develop this year long investigation..then to implement some of the solutions..he knows how to talk with the elites and the workers
Anand was on TVO in Canada. Would like to hear more. Billionaires, China and world problems. But there are others at work here. Division is a secondary goal of the rich and powerful.
Anand's book subject is the business model for Australia's entire economy, basically it's if there isn't an overseas camera lens in the face of major issues, no virtuous policy objective takes place, the depth of Australia's issue relevance is the depth of a tadpole rock pool! and the same intellect!
Yeah, here is a guy who gets it. Money cannot predominate over people as it has in one way or another throughout recording history. It is hard to change and we do not know what or how to change, but it has to happen. Authoritarian structures need to at the very least soften and be mediated by people and human needs - period.
Or the best rich person would give the other person one full sandwich and sits down to talk to him and try to understand what made him have nothing while this guy has 2 sandwiches, and try to see how to fix that inequality of the system because he can’t feed everyone who don’t have nothing to eat or even give the same guy another sandwich for next meal... it’s the parable called “drowning babies” that Anand quotes
Ya'll are crazy, I'm homeless for over 25 years, rich people give you nothing, the sandwich someone gives you, is probably from some minimum wage worker, who is scared shitless they are going to end up like you. They hand it to you, and say, "pray for me!" So I do!
Why not give the homeless person both sandwiches, because the rich person knows he can easily get a hundred more ? And then get that homeless person a chair, and table and clean water to drink. Why think in such limited ways? Imagine how blind we are to the pain and suffering of others that the debate of how much of a sandwich a rich person might share is being discussed !
When told that the peasants were starving Marie Antoinette is said to have replied, "Then let them eat cake." Most folks erroneously take this to mean that ole Marie was suggesting that starving peasants just skip to the dessert portion of the meal. Alas, what those people don't realize is that in Marie's time "cake" was the burnt black splatter of bread dough that stuck to the roof of the bread ovens. Periodically this "cake" would be chipped off the oven walls with a chisel and discarded. Thus Marie's proposed remedy for wide spread hunger among the poor was to feed them the the burnt bread dough splatter, or "cake." So the next time you hear someone like this interviewer ask why the superrich should be willing to reform their ways my suggestion is that you reply, "Great question, I wonder what Marie Antoinette's answer would be?"
A system designed to allow amassment of unlimited power must be modified or redesigned at a fundamental level. If you want real change, we must enable ourselves through direct democracy.
Corporate capture of govt and politicians is the primary key to their power. Money in elections and lobbyist access are the paths to that power. No change will come until that dynamic is significantly limited or eliminated.
I love listening to Anand but could someone please explain to me the lighting choice to me? Seriously were they trying to save money on their electricity bill?
I think it is quite useful to point out that some of the extremely wealthy people are not actually opposed to a change like he proposes. (Anand knows that and talks about it as a side note in some other talk [I do not have the source at hand]) But some are opposed to it and have practically unlimited funds for lobbying. Those who are not opposed would accept large tax increases without even being grumpy. And others would be grumpy, but not actively fight it in any way. Most of these people are quite intelligent, and not malicious. Some understand the problem, but are not actively lobbying for higher taxes. They give money to charities instead, and I think not all money given to charities is meant to whitewash something. All that does not contradict what Anand says. And what he says is brilliant. But the situation is a little less confrontational than it sounds here. (In the context of the talk, the confrontational aspect may be just right. I wrote this before seeing the whole talk.)
“I’ve been to many developed countries I’ve never seen those other pair of shoes” ~ Anand G. 😂😂😂😂 I’ve never seen them either! Someone def needs to investigate
All the "beautiful businesses" can still be philanthropists if they wish to be after they pay their fair share. The only difference is that they would not need to do it for their name sake and people would be better taken care of when in need. That would be a win if they don't choose to be charitable and a win-win if they still choose to support charities; if the donations go to real non-profit organizations that operate with an open book.
I have been saying the same thing for years about the threats of the wealthy leaving the U.S. but who am I? I'm not a Harvard graduate, so no one listened.
I need to write down his description of how win-win (I actually realized this recently) not working and I must finish Winner. Now how to get money out of politics.
I think it should start with schools, and how we build the characters of tomorrow. We should not seek to build everyone to be millionaires and reach the same mountaintops but to serve their communities in their capacity. The businessmen and woman of tomorrow must share space with the janitor and garbage collectors. The greed of the fewer and fewer are killing the many, and the fact we are so blind to this shows the glaring of our miseducation. We aim today to save one or two to charter education yet we throw so many communities to what exactly? What will be ther future, what will be the future of those who cast so many to refuse?
Anand should most definitely be the spokesperson for a Bernie administration. He is compassionate, lucid, articulate and correctly informed about the rot Bernie is fighting against. @anandgiridharadas you need to jump into the political fray. You must not remain on the sidelines as a journalist.
@@narcbegone1507 I can't find any links to him making a statement like that either. I've heard others say that before so it isn't impossible, but could you provide any links to Anand specifically saying something like that? He's always praised Bernie and his campaign from what I've seen and heard.
@@narcbegone1507 Thanks, dude. While I wouldn't agree completely with everything Anand said as we've seen Bernie connect directly with people and show his humanity both in the past and during this campaign, the issues he brought up also aren't completely without merit. He certainly wasn't trashing Bernie and he never called him "unlikeable" or "unrelateable" during this interview. To be fair though, Bernie has an image as being cantankerous and not always comfortable or willing to do the political schmoozing and glad-handing that comes so easily to so many other politicians. Bernie is no Jed Bartlet. It's an honesty in his character that doesn't serve political figures well as he does not suffer fools and can be rough around the edges and brusque with people at times. None of that takes away from all the positive things about Bernie which Anand praised him for being and doing. Thanks again for the link.
The Zakat system in Islam is a wealth tax as also proposed by Anand, counter to income tax. Islam had this system more than 1400 years ago. If everyone gives it, problem’s solved much.
It sucks that knowledge and understanding of "common goods" is so difficult to teach let alone learn that Anand has to come up with "emotional coinage" about the market's failure to distribute goods efficiently when goods are held in common such as air quality, water quality, commuity health, etc. We are doomed it seems unable to muster the courage as individual ecoomic actors and call for something better...like Senator Bernard Sanders as our Democratic Nominee for President! Wait! We can! Vote Bernie!!!!
Let's not forget that Facebook was originally a stolen idea for the purpose of rating the bangability of the entire class of young women entering Harvard.
Non native English speaking European people(German,Spanish etc) pronounce Indian names much much better than British,American or Australian people. Why is that ?
The ways in which certain letters, like d or r, are pronounced in other languages (German in particular) are very different from english. And probably map more closely to the original pronouciation of Indian names.
That's a general issue with having different native languages. Another example is the fact that most english speaking people can't pronounce Germanic (mostly female) names that end with an "e" and use an "a" instead: Names like "Sabine", "Brigitte" or "Anne" become "Sabina", "Bridget/Brigitta" or "Ana". It's actually kinda hilarious.
IF true, (I think it is) then: because exposure to at least One foregne Language make you more sensitive to foregn pronounciation in general. But I guess your Q was half retorical ?
Anand, why do you have Facebook account? Anand, why do you have a Twitter account? Anand, why is your book available on Amazon? Anand, do you own a mobile phone? Anand, were those fancy clothes you wear, made in India
I don't think he is saying any of those things shouldn't exist. I think he is saying they shouldn't produce an enormous amount of wealth and power for only a handful of people while other people struggle.
The host doesn't bother to ask the questions, how this jacket was made. How the raw material was extracted, how the people who performed the actual labor they were treated, and how the waste was utilized. Silly woman.
Two years later, we caught up with Anand again! You can watch our conversation about the state of democracy and the art of persuasion here: th-cam.com/video/fTJ5qL9VTWM/w-d-xo.html.
I love Anand! He is so well spoken about these issues. #Bernie2020
*Anand embodies the impotent rants, of a hypocrite!*
Anand, why do you have Facebook account?
Anand, why do you have a Twitter account?
Anand, why is your book available on Amazon?
Anand, do you own a car?
Anand, do you own a mobile phone?
Anand, do you have your own home, or a mortgage?
Anand, were they made in India!!!
Anand, where did you get your food from?
@@utubecomment21 He didn’t advocate a revolution to destroy all modernity , he only proposed to tax the rich more, all these things will still be around if you pass the wealth tax. Why are you so freaked out? He only demanded the rich not to be so selfish and greedy, behave more like a normal decent human being.
Robert Kennedy in 24
The more I hear him speak, the more I like him. He should be Bernie's Treasury Secretary.
Nah, he's too good of an attack dog. He's a journalist so give him the podium; let him be Bern's Press Secretary.
Anand would make a great Sec. of Education!!
He's a pretentious ass.
utube9000 Yet a pretentious ass with a hell of more compassion and righteousness than most.
You can hear him speak more about Bernieconomy in Michael Mores Rumble. It’s a fantastic podcast.
Every time I hear him, I am amazed, not just by his brilliance, but by his fierce and awesome anger. We are so ready for his call to action. He's just the most articulate of the angry and oppressed.
Exactly why I can’t support him. You can’t allow people angry and with a victim mentality into power.
Yet he works for Time he should move over to the nation imho
Yes he is... brilliant and passionate
Id be interested to know where you get the sense of victim mentality from. @revelaciones financieras
@@arod1766 his anger is for us and he doesn't have a victim mentality seeing that he comes from the one percent background. You can't be the victim when you're at the top of the pile and he's talking on behalf of us not himself because what he's proposing will financially harm him. You can't say that he has a victim mentality when he is literally advocating for something that will financially harm him.
Anand is easily my new favorite author and I've been thoroughly enjoying hearing/watching him speak as well. He is a gifted orator, writer, analyst, and investigator.
Fhoulghl Ofdnposdu my favorite book too. But in a shared first with The Populist Guide to 2020.
*Anand embodies the impotent rants, of a hypocrite!*
Anand, why do you have Facebook account?
Anand, why do you have a Twitter account?
Anand, why is your book available on Amazon?
Anand, do you own a car?
Anand, do you own a mobile phone?
Anand, do you have your own home, or a mortgage?
Anand, were they made in India!!!
Anand, where did you get your food from?
They want to change the world, but don’t want their world to change.
Like the Rockefellers, Rockefellers institute, and all their greedy power hungry organizations.
Federal Reserve ..etc etc.
The definition of conservative.
@Michael Freed Like, we in the west, we want to fix global warming, without giving up the lifestyle that lead to it?
@Michael Freed No, I don't. I believe in collective intelligence.
Well said.
The billionaire class has forgotten we all settled on taxes being the more civil alternative to the guillotine
This audience will nod and clap -and return to vulture capitalism, the very next day.
@@russwilson2305 as they fork their meat, and eyeball their friends wives..
@@philipmichel9273 -slurp their egg whites and plot against us.
The politicians who are using our taxes to benefit them also forgot.
Yet somehow taxes have historically always been used as a tool of oppression. The only thing that could potentially make the tax dynamic different was if that tool was held by "the people "and not a ruling elite of rich people. So when was the last time you had any say in how taxes are collected and used ?
I know nothing about House of Beautiful Business - but I am giving this video a thumbs up because it features Anand Giridharadas.
Same.
chapeau to the interviewer… she was fantastic and at Anand's intellectual level… we don't get to see this very often… Awesome interview… thank you for posting
I could listen to Anand G. all damn day.
Thank you for denouncing damn Facebook right off the bat. Hopefully your dream of breaking up that company will come true and people will finally admit that FB is predatory and abusive and has cultural and political power that no corporation should ever have. Bless you, Anand, for your forceful truthfulness. Nothing is more badly needed (especially in Washington DC)!
Forceful truthfulness..is such an honest way to put it
9:00 Why is this EPIC conversation filmed in the dark? Okay, the Director, the Producer, AND the Lighting guy were stoned? Thank the Gods that the sound engineer was wide awake!
I love this guy! 👍
Léa is cool. Anand had interesting conversation on Michael Moore Rumble podcast (episode 9).
That episode was AMAZING
28:15 The MIT story suggests strongly the biggest argument in supporting the end of blind fundraising and a return to Democracy.
“Generations of patriarchy is a posture problem”, this guy is just amazing!!!
Anand : One of the Greatest American Heroes of Our Time. No doubt .
Isnt he Indian? The one with the dot ?
Indians with the feather are American
Man is a political animal
It is clear that the best partnership in a state is the one which operates through the middle people and also that those states in which the middle element is large and stronger if possible than the other two together or at any rate stronger than either of them alone have every chance of a well run constitution
Aristotle's, Politics
Robert Mitchell Anand was born in Ohio, raised and educated in US of A. But your right , only Natives are truly “American “ if you want to be technical
@@alejandramguerrero5885
But American really means white Americans
He is more black
The only reason why i watched the whole video is to listen to Anand. He always brings something new to table. His clarity and his explanation is awesome. The lighting is awful. If it was another person , i would have skipped the video.
Who was the incredibly eloquent and great speaker that came before?
Ebele Okobi - Public Policy Director for Africa, the Middle East & Turkey at Facebook
True
To those who say if they are taxed 2% they won't start new companies ... GOOD. Less competition for those struggling to enter that market.
*Language such as "win-win" to describe a mutually beneficial arrangement is a logical fallacy* . Employing the term, "win", presumes a contest that must, by definition, designate a loser. Where Mr. Giridharadas describes a mutually beneficial arrangement, such as an exchange of goods, he does not account for the exploitation of labor and consumption of resources that contribute to the production of exchange goods. Exploitation for profit relegates the "exploited" as the losers.
It seems to me that predatory "thought leaders" are those who likely devised the fallacious "win-win" euphemism.
Mr. Giridharadas' writing and speaking engagements are invaluable. Thank you for hosting and producing this event.
Real change involves the loss of power.
@18:52 "Real change involves the loss of power." My new life's mantra.
He is dropping gold knowledge.
Found him today and he is what I needed to hear to articulate my suspicions
I'm a massive fan. I want to read his book as soon as I can. Thanks.
As i understand the income inequality issue there is only one common sense outcome if the problem is not addressed, " THE PITCHFORKS WILL COME OUT".
Ive been saying this for over 3 years now..
What is smart and thoughtful without empathy?
Starts with a "P" and ends with a "G" 😇
A sociopath
Thank goodness for Anand Giridharadas, there is thinking out there that can see the psychological reality of where we are about to slip into.
This. Yes. Great points.
Anand never dissapoints
Do you know the feeling when you've had all these feelings that made you really angry for so long and then all of a sudden a guy comes around and articulates in 5 mins what you always felt, but failed to grasp? Anand is scratching the most unbearable itch I never knew I had^^
I agree! Also, listen to Prof. Richard Wolff. He is right on it too.
Bro! You are my hero!
Great job Anand Giridharadas !!! It's about f*cking time
Yes change happens when those who have power understands what is human instead of just yearly profits... lady wake up.
Anand is a great guy. Keep up this terrific work you are doing. Reminds me of the man who in Jack London's 'The Iron Heel' challenges the plutocrats in their lair. An uneven book but helped inspire 1984 as 'The People of the Abyss' inpsired Orwell's 'Down and Out in London and Paris' Only 'People....' is the better book. Jack's best work deserves a new airing.
If you really want to change things, we need to have the power to amend the Constitution. This lever enables all reforms.
Yes he needs to be able to develop this year long investigation..then to implement some of the solutions..he knows how to talk with the elites and the workers
Anand was on TVO in Canada. Would like to hear more.
Billionaires, China and world problems. But there are others at work here. Division is a secondary goal of the rich and powerful.
Its not gonna happen. Nobody gonna give up power
Giridharadas #2028 for Prez, after 4 years as Bernie's Treasury Sec.
@41:55 "...well go?" EXACTLY what Bernie should have said LIVE IN THE DEBATE!
Anand's book subject is the business model for Australia's entire economy, basically it's if there isn't an overseas camera lens in the face of major issues, no virtuous policy objective takes place, the depth of Australia's issue relevance is the depth of a tadpole rock pool! and the same intellect!
Yeah, here is a guy who gets it. Money cannot predominate over people as it has in one way or another throughout recording history. It is hard to change and we do not know what or how to change, but it has to happen. Authoritarian structures need to at the very least soften and be mediated by people and human needs - period.
If a "good" rich person walks down the street with two sandwiches in his hand and sees a homeless person, he would give him half a sandwich.
No he'd give him a whole sandwich .
Or the best rich person would give the other person one full sandwich and sits down to talk to him and try to understand what made him have nothing while this guy has 2 sandwiches, and try to see how to fix that inequality of the system because he can’t feed everyone who don’t have nothing to eat or even give the same guy another sandwich for next meal... it’s the parable called “drowning babies” that Anand quotes
He would offer to sell him half a sandwich perhaps for a shoe shine. There has to be an upward exchange of value in a capitalist transaction.
Ya'll are crazy, I'm homeless for over 25 years, rich people give you nothing, the sandwich someone gives you, is probably from some minimum wage worker, who is scared shitless they are going to end up like you. They hand it to you, and say, "pray for me!" So I do!
Why not give the homeless person both sandwiches, because the rich person knows he can easily get a hundred more ?
And then get that homeless person a chair, and table and clean water to drink.
Why think in such limited ways?
Imagine how blind we are to the pain and suffering of others that the debate of how much of a sandwich a rich person might share is being discussed !
When told that the peasants were starving Marie Antoinette is said to have replied, "Then let them eat cake." Most folks erroneously take this to mean that ole Marie was suggesting that starving peasants just skip to the dessert portion of the meal. Alas, what those people don't realize is that in Marie's time "cake" was the burnt black splatter of bread dough that stuck to the roof of the bread ovens. Periodically this "cake" would be chipped off the oven walls with a chisel and discarded. Thus Marie's proposed remedy for wide spread hunger among the poor was to feed them the the burnt bread dough splatter, or "cake." So the next time you hear someone like this interviewer ask why the superrich should be willing to reform their ways my suggestion is that you reply, "Great question, I wonder what Marie Antoinette's answer would be?"
Stop and Fleece billionaires. Part of Operation Maximum Wage : when they set our minimum wage, we get to set their max.
epic lol
You are my hero...
Sure would be nice if somebody told us the context: what country is this in and what speaker preceded Anand?
A system designed to allow amassment of unlimited power must be modified or redesigned at a fundamental level. If you want real change, we must enable ourselves through direct democracy.
Corporate capture of govt and politicians is the primary key to their power. Money in elections and lobbyist access are the paths to that power. No change will come until that dynamic is significantly limited or eliminated.
Would love to hear Anand in conversation with naomi klein christopher hitchens and yes even chris hayes perhaps as moderator
Meant christpher hedges i know the great hitch is no longer with us sadly
Amazon, facebook, google, banks should be nationalized or we have to create competitive national companies to bit them down.
They should be regulated before all.
I love listening to Anand but could someone please explain to me the lighting choice to me? Seriously were they trying to save money on their electricity bill?
fantastic
Why is this not viral?
Elite generosity is the wing man of injustice..
Wow.wow.wow.
😃Whoa!...Wow wow wow!!!
💎Nuggets - 💎Nuggets - 💎Nuggets
I think it is quite useful to point out that some of the extremely wealthy people are not actually opposed to a change like he proposes.
(Anand knows that and talks about it as a side note in some other talk [I do not have the source at hand])
But some are opposed to it and have practically unlimited funds for lobbying.
Those who are not opposed would accept large tax increases without even being grumpy.
And others would be grumpy, but not actively fight it in any way.
Most of these people are quite intelligent, and not malicious. Some understand the problem,
but are not actively lobbying for higher taxes. They give money to charities instead,
and I think not all money given to charities is meant to whitewash something.
All that does not contradict what Anand says. And what he says is brilliant.
But the situation is a little less confrontational than it sounds here.
(In the context of the talk, the confrontational aspect may be just right. I wrote this before seeing the whole talk.)
“I’ve been to many developed countries I’ve never seen those other pair of shoes” ~ Anand G.
😂😂😂😂 I’ve never seen them either! Someone def needs to investigate
All the "beautiful businesses" can still be philanthropists if they wish to be after they pay their fair share. The only difference is that they would not need to do it for their name sake and people would be better taken care of when in need. That would be a win if they don't choose to be charitable and a win-win if they still choose to support charities; if the donations go to real non-profit organizations that operate with an open book.
They're stuck in it because they want it to be true..classic male. We own reality, mansplaining, etc.
At least they are willing to listen to him. But dont worry they are not going to do anything to make the world better.
Jimmy Dore, calls Anand ,that guy,lol
Dore is annoying.
This is one time that Dore's formidable BS detector failed him.
In a recent video, Dore acknowledges his viewers ripped him up for that spat of ignorance.
I'd would LOVE to see ANY one of those CEOs do a shift at Amazon and see if "A lot of people just don't like to work."
Who was the speaker just before him?? I'm intrigued
Ebele Okobi
anand is a beautiful spy like chris hedges or fdr
*is it beautiful business for Lea to have a headset & Anand to be holding the Mic* ...?
😋🤣😄😅😆😉😂
airmark02 😂 I had the same thought... rude!
Follow your own advice and RUN.FOR.OFFICE.NOW!!!
I have been saying the same thing for years about the threats of the wealthy leaving the U.S. but who am I? I'm not a Harvard graduate, so no one listened.
Corona ... Loss of power, rich or poor ... Now thats the Winner, and taking it all ...
Somebody ought to send this to Mayor Pete...he needs help!!!!
more power anand
I need to write down his description of how win-win (I actually realized this recently) not working and I must finish Winner. Now how to get money out of politics.
I understand his argument, but in his view who are the good billionaires? Musk? Gates?
I think it should start with schools, and how we build the characters of tomorrow. We should not seek to build everyone to be millionaires and reach the same mountaintops but to serve their communities in their capacity. The businessmen and woman of tomorrow must share space with the janitor and garbage collectors. The greed of the fewer and fewer are killing the many, and the fact we are so blind to this shows the glaring of our miseducation. We aim today to save one or two to charter education yet we throw so many communities to what exactly? What will be ther future, what will be the future of those who cast so many to refuse?
Read "The Selfish Ape: human nature and our path to extinction" by Nicholas P. Money and get the straight scoop on our non-future.
The rich and powerful hv corrupted everything. Yes everything.
This is the reason why nothing ever gets done.
This October, Anand is returning to the House! Details and free signup: houseofbeautifulbusiness.com/calendar/resident-circle-october-28.
Anand should most definitely be the spokesperson for a Bernie administration. He is compassionate, lucid, articulate and correctly informed about the rot Bernie is fighting against. @anandgiridharadas you need to jump into the political fray. You must not remain on the sidelines as a journalist.
Anand trashed Bernie on Democracy Now as "unlikeable" and "unrelateable". A few months ago.
Narc Begone I wasn’t aware of that. Do you have a link?
@@narcbegone1507 I can't find any links to him making a statement like that either. I've heard others say that before so it isn't impossible, but could you provide any links to Anand specifically saying something like that? He's always praised Bernie and his campaign from what I've seen and heard.
th-cam.com/video/uRd0flckJjA/w-d-xo.html
@@narcbegone1507 Thanks, dude. While I wouldn't agree completely with everything Anand said as we've seen Bernie connect directly with people and show his humanity both in the past and during this campaign, the issues he brought up also aren't completely without merit. He certainly wasn't trashing Bernie and he never called him "unlikeable" or "unrelateable" during this interview. To be fair though, Bernie has an image as being cantankerous and not always comfortable or willing to do the political schmoozing and glad-handing that comes so easily to so many other politicians. Bernie is no Jed Bartlet. It's an honesty in his character that doesn't serve political figures well as he does not suffer fools and can be rough around the edges and brusque with people at times. None of that takes away from all the positive things about Bernie which Anand praised him for being and doing. Thanks again for the link.
Taxes pay for infrastructure. If one chooses not to pay taxes, they should go where there’s no infrastructure that needs maintenance dollars.
who did he follow?
Ebele Okobi- Public Policy Director for Africa, Middle East, and Turkey at Facebook
The Zakat system in Islam is a wealth tax as also proposed by Anand, counter to income tax. Islam had this system more than 1400 years ago. If everyone gives it, problem’s solved much.
As much as I like to fantasize the world to be better place for all, but no men can do it because we are a fallen people.
@30:30 "...what do you propose...?" The IRS is said to be sending Americans $1200. Ironically, the prize for a Guillotine today is about $1200. Hmm...
Did he just say Jared Kushner is thoughtful???!!! Why is he undermining himself and his motives?!
I want to write the book that follows this one, about how to divorce political and economic power for good. Democracy won't happen before that.
It sucks that knowledge and understanding of "common goods" is so difficult to teach let alone learn that Anand has to come up with "emotional coinage" about the market's failure to distribute goods efficiently when goods are held in common such as air quality, water quality, commuity health, etc. We are doomed it seems unable to muster the courage as individual ecoomic actors and call for something better...like Senator Bernard Sanders as our Democratic Nominee for President! Wait! We can! Vote Bernie!!!!
Let's not forget that Facebook was originally a stolen idea for the purpose of rating the bangability of the entire class of young women entering Harvard.
Non native English speaking European people(German,Spanish etc) pronounce Indian names much much better than British,American or Australian people. Why is that ?
She pronounced it right. His name rhymes with almond as he himself says. I know that's not how even an Indian would pronounce his name.
The ways in which certain letters, like d or r, are pronounced in other languages (German in particular) are very different from english. And probably map more closely to the original pronouciation of Indian names.
varun reddy Mothe , Trump would call him
Anand bing bing!
That's a general issue with having different native languages. Another example is the fact that most english speaking people can't pronounce Germanic (mostly female) names that end with an "e" and use an "a" instead: Names like "Sabine", "Brigitte" or "Anne" become "Sabina", "Bridget/Brigitta" or "Ana". It's actually kinda hilarious.
IF true, (I think it is) then: because exposure to at least One foregne Language make you more sensitive to foregn pronounciation in general. But I guess your Q was half retorical ?
How to change our current politics is to elect RFK for President and suspend all disbelief to do it. Would be enough.
warren is giving her votes/delegates to bloomberg or biden. do you really want to vote for those?
1,000 times more than Trump, without QUESTION.
Anyone. But. Trump.
Applause applause.
The feminine needs a better place in the position of feminism. It is weakened in our pop culture.
If revolution ever happened, I believe Anand will be walking on street with baseball bat in hat looking for Billionaires
My god; is she specious, and just plain silly.
Soon, the poor will have nothing to eat but the rich !
Sorry, no. The rich will feed the poor to each other. Soylent Green will be people - though they'll probably have to rebrand it.
Anand, why do you have Facebook account?
Anand, why do you have a Twitter account?
Anand, why is your book available on Amazon?
Anand, do you own a mobile phone?
Anand, were those fancy clothes you wear, made in India
I don't think he is saying any of those things shouldn't exist. I think he is saying they shouldn't produce an enormous amount of wealth and power for only a handful of people while other people struggle.
Is USA a curse for humanity ?
The host doesn't bother to ask the questions, how this jacket was made. How the raw material was extracted, how the people who performed the actual labor they were treated, and how the waste was utilized. Silly woman.