dude I just found ur TH-cam channel after I saw an article about ur comment on how Daniel bluff in a 4spade board in hsp. U said it’s good to have some bluff range like set and 2 pairs on a 4 flush board really impressed me because I never think of that before.I really like your contents and I hope you can keep it up.
The problem, for me, w/ the QQ catch BvB is that range composition pre differs so widely. It differs less so nowadays but I think it's not unreasonable to think that BB 3b can include alot more suited Ax than a saved run will. The other problem being (& the reason suited Ax is 3b sparingly BvB) that we are incentivized to call vs 4b. W/ your seeming perspective on the spot I probably would of called too, but looking at the spot from an outside perspective, I'd wonder how much credence I was putting into the hand being a cool catch and if our opponent finds enough of these somewhat unintuitive bluffs. I'd then likely level myself into thinking the sizing and line could initiate villains bluff at some freq' & likely therefore pay him off but in gona run this spot and see how BB's range needs to look otr for indifference w/ QQ. nh
"limped pots are very exciting there like the unexplored frontier of poker" i wish i had this attitude when im at a table full of limpers and cold callers ahah
4:40 in these spots I don't understand how a card like the 2 of clubs can really ever be considered a blocker... what do you block? 23 of clubs maybe? A2? 22 you would want your opponent to have if you choose to bluff this spot. I just feel like it looks like a good card to have in this spot but really isn't at all. Am I wrong?
I asked this in a previous, basically it boils down to higher the flush blocker better the blocking property. That being said I'm guessing the villain randomized.
It's not the perfect blocker, that's why you're supposed to randomize with it. But we do want to bluff with less than perfect blockers and it does block only calling hands (not blocking any folding hands)
The shove with QJs at 11:00 stands out to me a bit. I don't think this hand is that great of a jam OTR because it's blockers to Kx aren't that good in this formation. HJ isn't going to have a lot of KJs,KQs like he would if this were SB vs BU. He's mainly going to have a lot of AKo so I really think you want an A here, like AQo, most of the time when blasting off. Ace of spades would probably be fine as well since it blocks more AKo than any other A even if it also blocks the bricked FD.
5:35 KsQh. You’ll probably agree that having the Ks isn’t ideal 😀 Plus, rarely do I see recreational players willing to bluff raise all in in this spot. Overall great video as always and some very cool lines
The shove with a8s against qq seems a bit thin to me from your opponent’s perspective. Hes getting snapped by 8 combos of aq ak. And you could definitly fold sometimes the 12 combos of qq / kk. Also you have a few more aces with higher and lower kickers but that doesnt count imo
dude I just found ur TH-cam channel after I saw an article about ur comment on how Daniel bluff in a 4spade board in hsp. U said it’s good to have some bluff range like set and 2 pairs on a 4 flush board really impressed me because I never think of that before.I really like your contents and I hope you can keep it up.
One of the best poiker youtube channels honestly, good shit. Shocked you don't have more subs by now
The problem, for me, w/ the QQ catch BvB is that range composition pre differs so widely. It differs less so nowadays but I think it's not unreasonable to think that BB 3b can include alot more suited Ax than a saved run will. The other problem being (& the reason suited Ax is 3b sparingly BvB) that we are incentivized to call vs 4b. W/ your seeming perspective on the spot I probably would of called too, but looking at the spot from an outside perspective, I'd wonder how much credence I was putting into the hand being a cool catch and if our opponent finds enough of these somewhat unintuitive bluffs.
I'd then likely level myself into thinking the sizing and line could initiate villains bluff at some freq' & likely therefore pay him off but in gona run this spot and see how BB's range needs to look otr for indifference w/ QQ. nh
Yeah I tend to agree with this, I'm not very excited about the spot. Let me know what results you get after running!
I like it when Uri gives tips.
Another fabulous video.
"limped pots are very exciting there like the unexplored frontier of poker" i wish i had this attitude when im at a table full of limpers and cold callers ahah
4:40 in these spots I don't understand how a card like the 2 of clubs can really ever be considered a blocker... what do you block? 23 of clubs maybe? A2? 22 you would want your opponent to have if you choose to bluff this spot. I just feel like it looks like a good card to have in this spot but really isn't at all. Am I wrong?
I asked this in a previous, basically it boils down to higher the flush blocker better the blocking property. That being said I'm guessing the villain randomized.
It's not the perfect blocker, that's why you're supposed to randomize with it. But we do want to bluff with less than perfect blockers and it does block only calling hands (not blocking any folding hands)
The shove with QJs at 11:00 stands out to me a bit. I don't think this hand is that great of a jam OTR because it's blockers to Kx aren't that good in this formation. HJ isn't going to have a lot of KJs,KQs like he would if this were SB vs BU. He's mainly going to have a lot of AKo so I really think you want an A here, like AQo, most of the time when blasting off. Ace of spades would probably be fine as well since it blocks more AKo than any other A even if it also blocks the bricked FD.
6.48 you 3bet QQ BvB to 3x. Is this your normal sizing in these positions or an adjustment to someone who isn't 3bet bluffing enough?
Cool video BTW!
5:35 KsQh.
You’ll probably agree that having the Ks isn’t ideal 😀
Plus, rarely do I see recreational players willing to bluff raise all in in this spot.
Overall great video as always and some very cool lines
The shove with a8s against qq seems a bit thin to me from your opponent’s perspective. Hes getting snapped by 8 combos of aq ak. And you could definitly fold sometimes the 12 combos of qq / kk. Also you have a few more aces with higher and lower kickers but that doesnt count imo
You are assuming hero is going to use the same size with AQ/AK there that he is using with QQ
#quality