We should also not discount Nico's movement inside the box and ability to get in the right positions, which may have massively contributed to him getting all those chances. That's a factor to consider as well. Does Sesko has that? It remains to be seen.
personally as a chelsea fan i feel like signing Sesko is the best option because he would be cheaper to buy imagine if chelsea had bought osimen which will cost alot of money just like buying back lukaku thank you goal 90 for the help i hope chelsea wont miss the opportunity to sign a real striker even since tammy abraham left
what the point of bringing in another young unproven player, id rather at least have osimhen bring some sort of experience than someone who has a potential to flop in the premier league
i like sesko to play as central striker supported by nico on the right and nkunku on the left with 3 attacking midfield/wingmudryk/palmer/madueke with 2 cm of Gallagher/enzo protected by 2 dm of caceido/cucu/lavia.
This guy is no way near Jackson level, real madrid wanted Benzema gone, they were calling him fraud but they were patient with him, just be patient with Jackson he Will become good. Jackson work rate is immense by picking up the Ball in hour half to create space for his team , not many strikers are mobile like that in the Prem, one of a kind no doubt.
@@toyeebniniola7674 what you need is what you wont get.....we did an experiment with Morata ( Flop ), we use Tammy Abraham ( Not that great), we try with Timo Werner ( Not that great), then you went for Lukaka ( Flop ) , you went for this cheap shot Fofana ( Not a baller ).....then you find a striker Like Nico Jackson Who makes Chelsea look fluid in transition and dropping deep to create chances for our midfielders that those strikers couldnt do. The boy Is Gem, dont be like Real Madrid Who wanted Benzema out from 2012 but turn out to be a super star. There is a player in Jackson and he Will become great a bet you.
I think that's the wrong comparison. don't compare young Benzema to Jackson. Benz was a natural finisher even when he was at Lyon. why it didn't work out for him at Real Madrid at the beginning is because he was in the shadow of Ronaldo. Yes Jackson can Improve but Sesko is better finisher that him right now.
@@waynefinkman5628 thanks bro if we have Jackson we will need a finisher there are some games we always need a finisher and some games we need Jackson type
What's the point of nico Jackson then? Why did they bought him then . I agree that he misses chances but it's his first season in the prem. He needs time to adapt. Last yr Nunez got hated for missing so many big chances . However he has improved this year. That's why I think Chelsea should trust him till atleast January. If he doesn't work then you can buy your striker. But that's just my opinion.
His release clause is around 55m which is very reasonable for someone his age and talent. Osimhen's release clause is 113m. I think Chelsea should go for Sesko and have him compete with Jackson. Osimhen would also ask for massive fees, I see him going to PSG. If Chelsea sell Lukaku and Hall, that is enough money to buy Sesko but they would need to sell 4 players to buy Osimhen plus pay the massive wages.
Osimhen is a far better choice. Every game you will see at least 2 defenders covering osimhen in seria A. A league that's known for their defence, and he still manages to score a bucket load of goals. If osimhen were to join Chelsea he would cause the prem defenders a headache, and he'll create spaces for palmer, maduke and caicedo, due to his striking presence. And osimhen heading prowess is sublime, fun fact he jumped higher than Ronaldo in the seria A, it just makes him an even more dangerous struker. But the one problem is thay osimhen will plau in the afcon, and because of this I would recommend Chelsea to sign a striker that has potential, who isn't expensive but also buy osimhen, so that when osimhen plays in the AFCON their will be a player to cover for him.
If Chelsea could just get rid of Jackson and bring in osihmen and isak I put it to u that definitely the premier league will b coming to Stamford bridge next season
He forgot to say anything about their strength in which obviously we all know that osihmen is far ahead of sesko. To b very honest with you Osihmen is the best striker for Chelsea
Palmer will do that plenty over the coming years. Not having a solid goal-scoring threat has done more damage to the team than any potential lack of creativity or linking from not having Jackson.
Exactly why they should buy him alongwith osimhen, and play him as a squad player instead of a starter. So when osimhen is injured or on international duty, there's a good striker that can come in for osimhen.
@otdavid_ good idea but they might play him as a 1 striker with Madueke and Sterling which I think wouldn't work so Šesko and Osihmen could fire so many hoals in as Palmer could be the assistant
Jackson in link up play is better.the only problem is converting chances to goals.but with proper training and coach support and guidance he can be another top striker.
I think Sesko is very good but still developing, and Chelsea need a more experienced and proven goal scorer which Osimhen is. Especially against the bigger teams and in bigger moments. We need Osimhen's champion mentality and grit. I think Sesko would be a better signing in a year or two so it would be great if Chelsea manage to get both. An experienced striker and a young striker who can eventually become the main striker. Maybe Fofana is that player. We'll see what options are feasible and possible.
Osimhen has the ability, mentality, will, and grit to be successful at Chelsea. Above all else, he genuinely wants to play for Chelsea. He will do very well in his career for any team he plays for.
I’d like sesko, oshimen is a massive price tag…I’d sooner give Jackson the development time than bring in a £100m striker who has had as much goal involvement as Jackson in a easier league.
Bro Nico jackson just needs time. If we save the money on the strikers we could buy players in more needed positions at chelsea. If you give him time, he might become a 30 goal a season striker
They are all killing it in their current club, looking so great in Hilights, until they move to a bigger club. And then nothing from them. In addition, EPL is like a Hell, so tough to deliver properly there. So, i don't know ...
How is he better than Jackson when he got more goal, and assist than him in a harder league. Don't forget everything else Jackson come with oozing with talent just blind in front of goal sometimes
If we played in fast transition as with Poch Sesko is perfect but Maresca plays slow football like pep so not sure that the profile of Sesko is suitable for this type of game
Next season Chelsea need to compete for the top four. The team needs a proven goal scorer who can lead the front line, someone capable of scoring 20 goal per season from one of the top leagues in Europe. For example, experienced forwards like Isak, Watkins, osimhen or even Gyokeres. While Sesko is a good striker he is only 20 years, and like most young players he will need time to adapt the competitive nature of the epl and the pressure of playing for Chelsea. Sesko should stay at RB Leipzig for at least another season for his development, we already have Datro Fofana, Broja, and Dujuan Richards.
@@K41Z3RR No disrespect to Sesko he is a fine striker probably levels above the striker I have mentioned in my last sentence. However, he is not the finished article and we are stacked with young development strikers. It would be wise to sign an experienced forward who the younger players can learn from
Sesko would be a good option, but his age is a problem. We need a striker who is mature and ready to deal with the pressure. Also, there's no way he'll be sold for anything less than €80m. Especially if Chelsea are buying.
CF options are 1- Benjamin sesko 2- vangelis pavlidis 3- Jonathan David 4- Artem dovbyk 5- Viktor gyokeres 6- serhou guirassy. No to osimhem because he's injury prone and overpriced.
How many forward players did chelsea sign from Germany league? And what happened to them? Havertz & werner....not even become monster forwards they are.
Sesko would rack the goals up... Jackson plays well but misses not just chances... but clear cut chances... If Jackson had converted all those chances we would be talking top 4 easy
Nico missing 23 big chances😂😂 .....but scoring 14 goals that shows how creative our team is
Facts bro @BBACLASHER-mv5jr
@BBACLASH100 goals without Europe ER-mv5jr
@BBACLASHER-mv5jr not Potter's fault. Team was in disarray with high turnover of players.
We should also not discount Nico's movement inside the box and ability to get in the right positions, which may have massively contributed to him getting all those chances. That's a factor to consider as well. Does Sesko has that? It remains to be seen.
@@afrihension who should have it cuz Leipzig create way less than Chelsea
personally as a chelsea fan i feel like signing Sesko is the best option because he would be cheaper to buy imagine if chelsea had bought osimen which will cost alot of money just like buying back lukaku thank you goal 90 for the help i hope chelsea wont miss the opportunity to sign a real striker even since tammy abraham left
Makes no sense…
I really want sesko but what are we gonna do with Jackson
@@SoccerStar60 Second Striker, the question is "and Nkunku"?
what the point of bringing in another young unproven player, id rather at least have osimhen bring some sort of experience than someone who has a potential to flop in the premier league
@@lordmarlon6781Nkunku is not an out and out striker.
i like sesko to play as central striker supported by nico on the right and nkunku on the left with 3 attacking midfield/wingmudryk/palmer/madueke with 2 cm of Gallagher/enzo protected by 2 dm of caceido/cucu/lavia.
I like your idea. It's going to be /Caicedo and Lavia because I believe the team is going to sell Cucurella.
15 players on the pitch 🤔
This guy is no way near Jackson level, real madrid wanted Benzema gone, they were calling him fraud but they were patient with him, just be patient with Jackson he Will become good. Jackson work rate is immense by picking up the Ball in hour half to create space for his team , not many strikers are mobile like that in the Prem, one of a kind no doubt.
Fact 💯
Fact but we still need a goal scoring striker too to balance the equation ✅💎
@@toyeebniniola7674 what you need is what you wont get.....we did an experiment with Morata ( Flop ), we use Tammy Abraham ( Not that great), we try with Timo Werner ( Not that great), then you went for Lukaka ( Flop ) , you went for this cheap shot Fofana ( Not a baller ).....then you find a striker Like Nico Jackson Who makes Chelsea look fluid in transition and dropping deep to create chances for our midfielders that those strikers couldnt do. The boy Is Gem, dont be like Real Madrid Who wanted Benzema out from 2012 but turn out to be a super star. There is a player in Jackson and he Will become great a bet you.
I think that's the wrong comparison. don't compare young Benzema to Jackson. Benz was a natural finisher even when he was at Lyon. why it didn't work out for him at Real Madrid at the beginning is because he was in the shadow of Ronaldo. Yes Jackson can Improve but Sesko is better finisher that him right now.
@@waynefinkman5628 thanks bro if we have Jackson we will need a finisher there are some games we always need a finisher and some games we need Jackson type
You said the same thing about Nico Jackson for Chelsea
IK
Jackson is not a striker
@@S_ppy yes he is
Jackson is going to be one of the best striker mark my words
All players miss some chances. Even haaland missed some. 15 goals in bundasliga cannot be compared to 14 in premier league. Sesko will equally slop
What's the point of nico Jackson then? Why did they bought him then . I agree that he misses chances but it's his first season in the prem. He needs time to adapt. Last yr Nunez got hated for missing so many big chances . However he has improved this year. That's why I think Chelsea should trust him till atleast January. If he doesn't work then you can buy your striker. But that's just my opinion.
Nico can play as LW as well. we can have injuries ,also need to play Europa next season.
@@sajithsbabu but isn't his preferred position ST
@@BatmanFromGotham203 He can be included in that way. we need two very good strikers anyways, it should be like Anelka /Drogba, Aguero/Dzeko .
As a slovenian I am loving it
His release clause is around 55m which is very reasonable for someone his age and talent. Osimhen's release clause is 113m. I think Chelsea should go for Sesko and have him compete with Jackson. Osimhen would also ask for massive fees, I see him going to PSG. If Chelsea sell Lukaku and Hall, that is enough money to buy Sesko but they would need to sell 4 players to buy Osimhen plus pay the massive wages.
Sesko will be perfect because he is physical has good finsihing of someone his age he is very productive inside the box and can create space too
Osimhen is a far better choice. Every game you will see at least 2 defenders covering osimhen in seria A. A league that's known for their defence, and he still manages to score a bucket load of goals. If osimhen were to join Chelsea he would cause the prem defenders a headache, and he'll create spaces for palmer, maduke and caicedo, due to his striking presence. And osimhen heading prowess is sublime, fun fact he jumped higher than Ronaldo in the seria A, it just makes him an even more dangerous struker. But the one problem is thay osimhen will plau in the afcon, and because of this I would recommend Chelsea to sign a striker that has potential, who isn't expensive but also buy osimhen, so that when osimhen plays in the AFCON their will be a player to cover for him.
I'd have sold Jackson and got in both Sesko and Osimhen 😅
@@Iamwhatyousayiam lol. I was thinking the same thing
If Chelsea could just get rid of Jackson and bring in osihmen and isak I put it to u that definitely the premier league will b coming to Stamford bridge next season
He forgot to say anything about their strength in which obviously we all know that osihmen is far ahead of sesko.
To b very honest with you Osihmen is the best striker for Chelsea
Oshein is overrated. Been average this season, has same goals as Jackson and cost way more, already 25.
I wish you made more videos like this about all the youngsters
Jackson gets in positions to score. He is always involved. He links play. Not all strikers do this.
Palmer will do that plenty over the coming years. Not having a solid goal-scoring threat has done more damage to the team than any potential lack of creativity or linking from not having Jackson.
Šesko hax a great finishing touch and can score when the pressure is on even agsinst smaller teams
Exactly why they should buy him alongwith osimhen, and play him as a squad player instead of a starter. So when osimhen is injured or on international duty, there's a good striker that can come in for osimhen.
@@otdavid_ this isn’t FIFA.
@@infamouscfc793 There's something called selling players to make room for new players.
@otdavid_ good idea but they might play him as a 1 striker with Madueke and Sterling which I think wouldn't work so Šesko and Osihmen could fire so many hoals in as Palmer could be the assistant
Jackson in link up play is better.the only problem is converting chances to goals.but with proper training and coach support and guidance he can be another top striker.
I think Sesko is very good but still developing, and Chelsea need a more experienced and proven goal scorer which Osimhen is. Especially against the bigger teams and in bigger moments.
We need Osimhen's champion mentality and grit. I think Sesko would be a better signing in a year or two so it would be great if Chelsea manage to get both.
An experienced striker and a young striker who can eventually become the main striker. Maybe Fofana is that player. We'll see what options are feasible and possible.
Osihmen is overrated bro.
Nope not wasting 100mil on overrated seria strikers
Osimhen has the ability, mentality, will, and grit to be successful at Chelsea.
Above all else, he genuinely wants to play for Chelsea.
He will do very well in his career for any team he plays for.
I’d like sesko, oshimen is a massive price tag…I’d sooner give Jackson the development time than bring in a £100m striker who has had as much goal involvement as Jackson in a easier league.
Chelsesa don't need a striker , they should just trust Broja
Go support Luton for such a mediocre mentality
I Feel your pain
That coach left Three minutes before your videos 😅
Bro Nico jackson just needs time. If we save the money on the strikers we could buy players in more needed positions at chelsea. If you give him time, he might become a 30 goal a season striker
Shut up
What if he gets injured or redcareded who do we have as back up ??
@@keniffvj1 we should get that guy from leizig. i gorgot his name but he has 30 goals and his release clause is £15 million
Jackson is good on left attacking 👌 and sesko number 9
Jackson, apart from scoring, is very good.
They are all killing it in their current club, looking so great in Hilights, until they move to a bigger club. And then nothing from them. In addition, EPL is like a Hell, so tough to deliver properly there.
So, i don't know ...
Benjamin is perfect for Chelsea as striker he's Ideal.
which coach?
How is he better than Jackson when he got more goal, and assist than him in a harder league. Don't forget everything else Jackson come with oozing with talent just blind in front of goal sometimes
You shouldn't focus on goals scored but conversion rate bro.. if u are looking at goal scores, Jackson wouldn't be in Chelsea in the first place
@@xquisiteaymedia4427 Jackson is better at everything else. Running, dribbling, ball controls, link up
If we played in fast transition as with Poch Sesko is perfect but Maresca plays slow football like pep so not sure that the profile of Sesko is suitable for this type of game
When oshimen is too expensive Benjamin will be suitable
Damn I got recommended this just as his departure 😂😂
What killed me is when goal 90 guy said that Chelsea isn't even guaranteed Champions League football after this new season either 😂😂😂
He didn't actually refer to any team in particular. Just making a random statement of fact.
We don't need him he is too similar to players at the club we need Victor Osimhen and only him
Osimhen is a waste of money for Chelsea
You are right bro osimhen hav strength and one defender can't hold him that's why chelsea need him I prefer osimhen
Take away penalties and Jackson outscored Osimhen last season
What about the sporting striker do a video about him
As a European the African is the best option we need a player with physicality clinical and good in the Air and that's osimhen
You have really convinced me beyond any doubt that Cesco is whom we need. Not osihmen
Liverpool: we need this guy!
What happened to Darwizzy ?
Day 6 of asking goal 90 to do a video on man citys history
they hv history
What history
@@atharvxd821😂😂
@@atharvxd821 they have more history than u think
@@Ur_neymar_jr like I js said they have more history than u think
His coming to Arsenal mate!
Shouldn't have sacked poch, he was doing a great job
Next season Chelsea need to compete for the top four. The team needs a proven goal scorer who can lead the front line, someone capable of scoring 20 goal per season from one of the top leagues in Europe. For example, experienced forwards like Isak, Watkins, osimhen or even Gyokeres. While Sesko is a good striker he is only 20 years, and like most young players he will need time to adapt the competitive nature of the epl and the pressure of playing for Chelsea. Sesko should stay at RB Leipzig for at least another season for his development, we already have Datro Fofana, Broja, and Dujuan Richards.
Is the end of your last sentence some kind of humor?
@@K41Z3RR No disrespect to Sesko he is a fine striker probably levels above the striker I have mentioned in my last sentence. However, he is not the finished article and we are stacked with young development strikers. It would be wise to sign an experienced forward who the younger players can learn from
Goal 90, Your videos always make me happy, so I subscribed!
Thanks for subbing!
Based on Osimhen's present form I would prefer Chelsea sign sesko and Jackson needs competition and Duran is only left footed
Sesko would be a good option, but his age is a problem. We need a striker who is mature and ready to deal with the pressure. Also, there's no way he'll be sold for anything less than €80m. Especially if Chelsea are buying.
Its clause is 65 million euros
CF options are
1- Benjamin sesko
2- vangelis pavlidis
3- Jonathan David
4- Artem dovbyk
5- Viktor gyokeres
6- serhou guirassy.
No to osimhem because he's injury prone and overpriced.
Do Gyokeres next! To arsenal!
Sesko swap with Broja will be good for both parties. Broja will start scoring again, Sesko wont be bad for 56 m .
In the current market. He will be valued at 70m minimum
Sesko won't go for Chelsea.
He is better than the whole team.
Welcome to Arsenal Sesko
Where's your Champions League 🤫
Sesko is not better than Jackson. We don't need another younger striker. Get Guirassy and 1 CB.
Going to Chelsea will just ruin the man 😅😂
Like we ruined palmer😂
@@joelgeorge3442billion pound squad and perform like an under 10’s side most weeks it’s no wonder your one of the most meme’d teams on the planet 😂😂😂
@@-B-1 Youre clearly a clueless football fan. Dont speak when others are speaking brother.
@@-B-1delusional
@@tahira7954 what part is delusional Chelsea spent a billion and what have they done I’ll wait
That will be good idea
How many forward players did chelsea sign from Germany league? And what happened to them? Havertz & werner....not even become monster forwards they are.
All those guys are not strikers
Great info channel who make perfect choices for clubs
Don't wear number 9
😂😂true
Sesko would rack the goals up... Jackson plays well but misses not just chances... but clear cut chances... If Jackson had converted all those chances we would be talking top 4 easy
we need a box striker
Sesko...⚽💙👍
Bro as soon as he wear the shirt, he forget all about the things he has done and be a Darwin Nunez
But try and remember Nico was never a Striker when we bought him tho!
I don’t see this guy anywhere better than Jackson … please let stop over hyping
The pronunciation of Benjamin Šeško is soooo horrible 😭😭
Bring sesko
We need Taller striker than Halaand
Hes gonna go to arsenal
According to my thoughts Chelsea should go for sesko Ather than Osman
Come to Chelsea plssss❤
I've watched Ivan Toney. He can stay right the fuck where he is for my liking.
He is better in arsenal than in Chelsea
Am chelsea and I say arsenal is not fit. Arsenal does at the moment is better with attacking mids than a striker. They have more balance that way.
Sesko = Havertz/Jackson without the poor finishing. Arsenal want him for this exact reason. Chelsea needs to look at this guy.
Arsenal wants mudrik too, look at him now 😂
@@AlexandriaTheSecond Yes but they're not incapable of scouting a good player. Seems mudryk just fooled everybody.
Osimhen far better strength and one defender can't hold him
Chelsea need him
Problem is does sesko want to sign for Chelsea ? Probably other clubs looking to sign him also.
I like you idea some are not true
I see some parts of diego costa in him
Chelsea please sign sesko
Are Chelsea tryna Sign him
Do a video on man city 115 charges
Boring
anyone is better than jackson
Since Chelsea have Jackson.... going for sesko or the Lisbon striker would be preferable....
To buy osimhen, Jackson will have to leave
Osihmen is overrated
@@zikorajoe7093 he may be overated but there is something about that guy....
I said this same thing when I saw him in U17 world cup.
Chelsea is adapting there is no player that can come and change the team straight take example of nkunku
Jackson is better in my opinion and getting sesko is nothing but unwanted risk
Not happening hes moving to Arsenal i heard
Jackson is not a striker.
Instead they just go for Giminez or Gyokeres
Gyokeres is the same type of center forward as Jackson.
Nah I'm good with my Nicolas Jackson I like the way how he plays
😂 you have completely lost all standards. Are you a fan of a mid-table team or what.
Oshimen better
bruh, anything is better than nicolas jackson
i think barcelona needs him pls barca need him not chelsea a perfect lewa replacement 😮
Bro wants redbull
He’s not a clinical finisher, Chelsea need to be looking at Victor Osimhen
Osihmen? Clinical😂😂😂😂😂
@@zikorajoe7093 You’re correct mate, he definitely is.
What do you mean by this word? Clinical?
Chelsea should buy him and loan him out to Leipzig for one more season.
Sell Mudryk and get a good left winger.
Perfect for arsenal
Sesko is a great prayer
well he did get sacked now...
Victor osimhen is far better 💯
But to bad arsenal are getting him he will not want to come to a team that is in the Europa League
You guys have lukaku keep him he is good. Sesko better for Man United.
Give me Jonathan David over Sesko and Osimhen
His physique are big and slow... Just like broja
Chelsea can only dream, he coming to Arsenal
@@mohdroshidi1636 ofcourse chelsea smallest team in london, midtable club
@@Miloaistabur41bottle again,what a loser 😂🤣😅
@@Miloaistabur41bottle again,what a loser 😂🤣😅
@@Miloaistabur41bottle again,what a loser 😂🤣😅
@@Miloaistabur41bottle again, what a loser 😂🤣😅
These new Chelsea owners are low in mentality
He coming to arsenal 😅
Vendez Jackson et sanchez