All the bugs I talked about in this video have been fixed! (very quickly, thanks Eugen!) This was a rare chance for me to record a game live. Apologies that when I'm playing live I cannot zoom in much, if at all, but I hope you enjoy the carnage!
Hey, Vulcan. The video itself, as usual, is on top. It looks like you are not haunted by the failures of the SD 2 leagues in Warno. A big request - do not use such clickbait headers. A joke is no longer a joke if it is based on a real tragedy of people. Everything connected with Ukraine is daily pain, suffering and death. Don't let it get into your content, please. This is painfully perceived by caring people.
@@Zlata-Sher I mentioned this on stream but the titles relation to current events went completely over my head. Was not intentional, just described the situation in the video.
@@VulcanHDGaming As a Ukrainian currently living in Ukraine, I give you the official license to joke about the war. We do it all the time. Have you seen our recent "meme" drone attack on the occupied Crimea? We literally put memes on those drones. Slava Ukraini!
I think not seing the artillery trails makes the game a bit more interesting and realistic as you wouldn't normally see the trail in real life, but that's just my opinion.
Obviously shells don't leave a trail as the whistle through the air, but the player seeing them is still a realistic abstraction. In real life, the soldiers on the ground can hear the artillery coming and react accordingly. For the video game, since the units don't do that, and the surveillance resources whose job it is to locate and report the locations of enemy artillery to HQ are also not present, the "unrealistic" visual trail represents all of those missing elements in their stead. Maybe I'm stating the obvious. Anyway, great video.
@@carsonm7292 I agree, from a video game perspective. I found it « cool » to hear and see the enemy artillery fire from their base and try to guess where it was going to land ahah with the sound effect they have just before hitting the ground, it was pretty immersive. But I guess in the long run, it just advantages arty spammers and they had to correct to this.
The Mars rockets didn't kill heaps of stuff, but they were crucial to your pushes and defence. Every time your opponent was able to concentrate forces against you, you were able to hit them and damage and pin them down. I counted 5 T-80 kills off the back of arty.
The armor push in one of your recent PACT videos was good, but this was another level. Absolutely stunning game to watch, and IMO the live perspective worked great as well. I liked seeing the pairing of heavier recon infantry with the armor as well. That gave me some thoughts to take into deck building when I give WARNO another swing. Also I didn't read the patch notes so I missed the FOB add (first surprise, needed to check I wasn't watching a Red Dragon or ALB game) and also for some reason I never noticed SAS had MANPADS in WARNO (surprise two).
I kinda like the blind Arty fire. In reality you cant see the streak of artillery rounds. What should happen is they should add a Counter battery radar unit.
I personally enjoyed the live gameplay, and thought it led to some good moments - like with your Leopard push that obliterated 5+ enemy vehicles and let you basically push the enemy out of the left side almost entirely. Personally, I was surprised neither you nor your opponent (the one on the top right) decided to flank in the middle earlier. It looks like your opponent had defending forces in case you flanked, but if he had decided to send units into that gap he could have cut off your reinforcements and perhaps given his teammate a chance to push you back. He was unlikely to be able to push any further on the right side after all, especially with you backing up your teammate using tanks and anti-air.
For the purpose of veterancy, does it matter which leader you use? I.e. you have 27 panzergrenadiers- would they have better leadership bonus with a panzergrenadier leader, instead of a Jager leader, or does it not matter?
Hi, if anyone knows, what key is he using to give seperate orders to two units he has selected? I only know how to select a unit, give it an order, then click on another and give it an order
hey vulcan, what would you say is like the most "noob friendly" deck in warno? i really wanna get good at the french paras but i still seemingly am a tad slow sometimes when it comes to reacting, what would you say is a better start deck to work with?
I hope you don't mind me chipping in: for a new player I'd definitely pick a PACT division, specifically a Soviet one. They are more straightforward, almost every blue division has some shortcomings you'd have to play around. Not the 79th, because expensive tanks can become a liability in hands of an unexperienced player. Probably the 39th, because they are a good all-rounder. My personal favourite is the 35th - you get forward deployment, which is noob friendly(you dont have to rush, you can just take better position to contest an area), plenty of atgms in the form of konkurs+robot, good close range infantry, ok tanks(but in short supply). AA is lacking in this division so you'd definitely want to try to control the skies. On the opposite side, american divisions are the easiest to play with, so I'd go with airborne. Excellent 2xMG infantry.
I think the infantry decks are the most noob friendly since they have a bit of everything. Panzergrenadiers, 8th Infantry, etc. French paras have great elite infantry but require a lot of game knowledge to deal with other scenarios.
As have been mentioned previously 39th Guards and 8th Infantry are a good choice for either side. Otherwise 3rd Armored and 79th Tank are good with a little more experience, just make sure you have decent AA to support your pushes.
If you talked in a way that reflected your clickbait titles, your channel would be insufferable. Luckily you're a really chill and articulate dude and your titles couldn't be further from the actual vibe of your videos. Been watching since like 2015.
I totally agree. I don't even remember exactly when I subscribed to the channel. I don't think how much money I spent on maintaining the author (patreon, etc.), given that this is my second channel with a subscription. But this is the second video containing unacceptable references to the real tragedy taking place in Ukraine. When another such video with a clickbait title is released, I will be forced to unsubscribe. Such titles will attract an antagonistic audience not so much interested in the game as in politics.
@@VulcanHDGaming Imo it becomes clickbaity because you try to generate clicks based on current events. On that note I really hope you will reconsider the Ukraine references by the way. Personally, I dont consider it very tasteful given the gravity of the situation and the very, very real human suffering.
@@Zlata-SherIn this case the title was not intended to be inflammatory or related to current events. It was honestly completely unintentional as I realised and explained on stream. I only described the situation in the video. I'll admit the one with the T-34s was for fun and related though. This one was not.
All the bugs I talked about in this video have been fixed! (very quickly, thanks Eugen!) This was a rare chance for me to record a game live. Apologies that when I'm playing live I cannot zoom in much, if at all, but I hope you enjoy the carnage!
Hey, Vulcan. The video itself, as usual, is on top. It looks like you are not haunted by the failures of the SD 2 leagues in Warno. A big request - do not use such clickbait headers. A joke is no longer a joke if it is based on a real tragedy of people. Everything connected with Ukraine is daily pain, suffering and death. Don't let it get into your content, please. This is painfully perceived by caring people.
@@Zlata-Sher I mentioned this on stream but the titles relation to current events went completely over my head. Was not intentional, just described the situation in the video.
@@VulcanHDGaming As a Ukrainian currently living in Ukraine, I give you the official license to joke about the war. We do it all the time. Have you seen our recent "meme" drone attack on the occupied Crimea? We literally put memes on those drones. Slava Ukraini!
That Roland and Gepard save at the end (40:46) was bad-ass. Interception at full range is a sight to behold, no matter the unit.
I think not seing the artillery trails makes the game a bit more interesting and realistic as you wouldn't normally see the trail in real life, but that's just my opinion.
I agree that it definitely looks more realistic where it lands. The new effects they've added since are better realism wise though.
Agreed
Obviously shells don't leave a trail as the whistle through the air, but the player seeing them is still a realistic abstraction. In real life, the soldiers on the ground can hear the artillery coming and react accordingly. For the video game, since the units don't do that, and the surveillance resources whose job it is to locate and report the locations of enemy artillery to HQ are also not present, the "unrealistic" visual trail represents all of those missing elements in their stead. Maybe I'm stating the obvious. Anyway, great video.
I thought it was a bug at first
@@carsonm7292 I agree, from a video game perspective. I found it « cool » to hear and see the enemy artillery fire from their base and try to guess where it was going to land ahah with the sound effect they have just before hitting the ground, it was pretty immersive. But I guess in the long run, it just advantages arty spammers and they had to correct to this.
These live gameplays are awesome. Keep'em coming, if possible!
I'll have another one up soon!
Awesome!
Great video it blows me away how you can micro and commentate so well. Interesting strategy you used here.
The Mars rockets didn't kill heaps of stuff, but they were crucial to your pushes and defence. Every time your opponent was able to concentrate forces against you, you were able to hit them and damage and pin them down. I counted 5 T-80 kills off the back of arty.
26:15 the explosions in the distance are beatiful.
Yeah this game is gorgeous!
The armor push in one of your recent PACT videos was good, but this was another level. Absolutely stunning game to watch, and IMO the live perspective worked great as well. I liked seeing the pairing of heavier recon infantry with the armor as well. That gave me some thoughts to take into deck building when I give WARNO another swing. Also I didn't read the patch notes so I missed the FOB add (first surprise, needed to check I wasn't watching a Red Dragon or ALB game) and also for some reason I never noticed SAS had MANPADS in WARNO (surprise two).
You should watch the tank vs tank engagement that starts at 27:50
Finally a warno video! Let's gooooooo
Warno videos have become my favorite on your channel. You skill of dislodging the enemy from seemingly stalemate situations is very impressive
I kinda like the blind Arty fire. In reality you cant see the streak of artillery rounds. What should happen is they should add a Counter battery radar unit.
"on the prowl" nice thumbnail!
Love the Leopards and the 5th panzer! This was definitely fun to watch!!
I do appreciate to see live gameplay, since I find difficult to see it in YT
I personally enjoyed the live gameplay, and thought it led to some good moments - like with your Leopard push that obliterated 5+ enemy vehicles and let you basically push the enemy out of the left side almost entirely.
Personally, I was surprised neither you nor your opponent (the one on the top right) decided to flank in the middle earlier. It looks like your opponent had defending forces in case you flanked, but if he had decided to send units into that gap he could have cut off your reinforcements and perhaps given his teammate a chance to push you back. He was unlikely to be able to push any further on the right side after all, especially with you backing up your teammate using tanks and anti-air.
Always makes my day when you upload a new WARNO video, well palyed! :)
This aged like milk
12:30 "fuck it! We'll do it live! Fuckin thing sucks!"
Vulcan, consider turning on autosale of unarmed transports or use the L hotkey to sell them, limits micro.
I enjoy the live gameplay
Much enjoyed, thanks Vulcan
My pleasure!
For the purpose of veterancy, does it matter which leader you use? I.e. you have 27 panzergrenadiers- would they have better leadership bonus with a panzergrenadier leader, instead of a Jager leader, or does it not matter?
It does not matter.
those leopard 2A3's feking rocked!
How close is Warno to release these days? I was thinking of just jumping right in but if it's close to exiting Early Access I might wait.
I'm not sure but if you are interested in multiplayer the game is pretty much good to go.
Hi, if anyone knows, what key is he using to give seperate orders to two units he has selected? I only know how to select a unit, give it an order, then click on another and give it an order
Hit tab key
hey vulcan, what would you say is like the most "noob friendly" deck in warno? i really wanna get good at the french paras but i still seemingly am a tad slow sometimes when it comes to reacting, what would you say is a better start deck to work with?
I hope you don't mind me chipping in: for a new player I'd definitely pick a PACT division, specifically a Soviet one. They are more straightforward, almost every blue division has some shortcomings you'd have to play around. Not the 79th, because expensive tanks can become a liability in hands of an unexperienced player. Probably the 39th, because they are a good all-rounder. My personal favourite is the 35th - you get forward deployment, which is noob friendly(you dont have to rush, you can just take better position to contest an area), plenty of atgms in the form of konkurs+robot, good close range infantry, ok tanks(but in short supply). AA is lacking in this division so you'd definitely want to try to control the skies.
On the opposite side, american divisions are the easiest to play with, so I'd go with airborne. Excellent 2xMG infantry.
I think the infantry decks are the most noob friendly since they have a bit of everything. Panzergrenadiers, 8th Infantry, etc. French paras have great elite infantry but require a lot of game knowledge to deal with other scenarios.
As have been mentioned previously 39th Guards and 8th Infantry are a good choice for either side. Otherwise 3rd Armored and 79th Tank are good with a little more experience, just make sure you have decent AA to support your pushes.
Good Game! Wish theyd keep the artillery arc trails out of the game permanently!
awesome match
FIRST!!!! Awesome push, crazy you can do the live commentary whilst the fair micro! Live is super sick!
I'm surprised it went so well but all came together in the end!
IS THERE ANY PLAN TO [ Cheeese ] 🧀🧀 WITH CHEEP UNITES ... AND THE LAST PART OF VIDEO THE SNIPER TOOK DOWN A HELICOPTER ON MANY DAYS AGO
IT WAS GOOD..
yeah fight like HELL doctrine
it looks soooo much better without the arty "tracers"
The voicelines are usually quite good, but all these Chatter of West German soldiers about the DDR cruise ship Fritz Heckert is annoying
Why aren't you using auto sell? Love the warno videos, best content on your channel. Prefer the replays though
For those times I need a transport!
If you talked in a way that reflected your clickbait titles, your channel would be insufferable. Luckily you're a really chill and articulate dude and your titles couldn't be further from the actual vibe of your videos. Been watching since like 2015.
I try not to be clickbait with them, they do after all describe or relate to the content of the video. Glad you enjoy the videos!
I totally agree. I don't even remember exactly when I subscribed to the channel. I don't think how much money I spent on maintaining the author (patreon, etc.), given that this is my second channel with a subscription. But this is the second video containing unacceptable references to the real tragedy taking place in Ukraine. When another such video with a clickbait title is released, I will be forced to unsubscribe. Such titles will attract an antagonistic audience not so much interested in the game as in politics.
@@Zlata-Sher I wouldn't unsubscribe over it. But I do find it enormously distasteful too. I'm glad you mentioned it actually.
@@VulcanHDGaming Imo it becomes clickbaity because you try to generate clicks based on current events.
On that note I really hope you will reconsider the Ukraine references by the way. Personally, I dont consider it very tasteful given the gravity of the situation and the very, very real human suffering.
@@Zlata-SherIn this case the title was not intended to be inflammatory or related to current events. It was honestly completely unintentional as I realised and explained on stream. I only described the situation in the video. I'll admit the one with the T-34s was for fun and related though. This one was not.
Будут гореть ваши леопарды синим пламенем. Ждите видюшек🎉
glad your not playing the Russians, Slava Ukraine! ;)
Salava Z
Can you please let that in the real world?! A game should not be the place for that.
So when he is playing and winning with russian he is for sure supporting russian invasion, you monkey
British infantry division is one of the weakest in NATO.. SMH