Living in Wisconsin under my Ordinary, Bishop Morlino has been so wonderful, however... I miss Mater Ecclesiae like no other. A friend coined the phrase," A Model Parish with A Model Priest" . I couldn't have said it better. God love you Father Pasley and the wonderful parishioners of Mater Ecclesiae . You will always be in my daily prayers and in my heart.
Not sure what the excitement is about. The 1955 changes are valid and promulgated by Pope Pius XII. Refusing to obey the Chair of St. Peter makes one no different than the protestants.
Moses King the chair of St. Peter said that a gay man was made that way by god. Either your pope is not mentally sound, or he isn’t in mouth piece of god, and you need to become orthodox.
@@Православл try a little humility. You can't choose what is true, you need to choose where the source of truth is. But then you've got to stick to that.
Moses King 1955 changes are of modernist! After 1954, Pope Pius XII had become sick, he had nightmare and exhaust his body , the modernist had taken advantage of this.
@@larryjohnwong And the authority of the Church may order a different time of celebration. just as one of the prayers of Good Friday was changed by Benedict XVI
This truly is a great endeavor, wonderfully produced. Why would parents bring a baby who should be in bed to any long services that may sound like I am and old faddy daddy how ever Its not fair to the baby or the faithful ARE BABY SITTERS expensive. I wish could come to Mater Ecc more often. GOD Bless Fr. Pasley and the fine folks of Mater Ecclesiae.
Anyone present for such a Holy Mass receives many graces and benefits for their soul, babies included. The parents are allowing a great good for their children in having them present. "A Mass that is not crying is a Mass that is dying."
Hate to nitpick, but even the Novus Ordo guidelines go out of their way to make it abundantly clear that the whole thing should begin after (at least) the end of civil twilight. The Easter Vigil should never begin in the afternoon.
Sarto2010, calling a fellow Catholic an "imbecile " for holding another liturgical point of view, isn't very christlike or charitable. Unfortunately, such comments give traditionalists like yourself a well-deserved ,but very bad reputation.
From Mater Ecclesiae Chapel: The Easter Vigil is a Vesperal service; that is, it is properly celebrated in the late afternoon/evening between the Hours of None and Vespers, with a short Vespers at the end of the Vigil Mass. It is an evening service, not a nocturnal one. The Vigil and Mass of Holy Saturday are a proper Liturgy to Holy Saturday itself for the purpose of receiving Catechumens into the Church and keeping watch; it is not the celebration of the Resurrection, although the joy thereof begins to be anticipated. The Mass lacks Propers, the Credo, and the Kiss of Peace in addition to the lack of candles borne at the Gospel; all of these omissions are indicative that it is not a Mass of Sunday and that we are still awaiting the Resurrection. The "First" (and only) Mass of the Resurrection is that of Easter Sunday morning. Nowhere in Tradition did Easter ever have a "First Mass at Midnight" the way Christmas does, until such a novelty was invented in 1951-1955. The traditional and true nocturnal service of Easter is Paschal Matins and Lauds which begins the actual celebration of the Resurrection.
Kurt Gödel You’re right but also not - it wasn’t done with the *Paschal* Candle. It was done with the 3-branched candle, as it is done in this video. I have a pre-55 Missal, and the procession with the ‘Lumen Christi’ was done as in the video.
To celebrate the Easter Vigil, which in the ancient liturgical tradition of the Catholic Church takes place at night and not under the fullness of the noonday sun as shown here is an aberration. Unfortunately, this is an attempt by some traditional religious communities and others to reject any type of liturgical development or even restoration of a proper ancient usage. As a traditionalist, I applaud the 1955 liturgical changes particularly the restoration of the proper liturgical times.
Giovanni Serafino No, it has been tradition in Roman rite for more than 1000 years to celebrate Easter Vigil in the morning of Holy Saturday. 1955 changes are of modernist, many people forget that Pope Pius XII had become sick after 1954 to the point he consider resigning, Bugnini and his company had taken advantage of this.
The Easter Vigil has always been a Vesperal Mass, and if you were to 'truly' restore the timing it would still take place with reasonable light outside because Vespers is the evening prayer, not the night prayer of the church. The holy week reforms of 1955 removed first vespers of easter and changed the mass to a 'lauds' mass. The first mass of easter is Easter sunday, not the easter vigil. Even the Orthodox celebrate their easter vigil in the morning or afternoon of Holy Saturday. How can you call this a restoration of proper ancient usage when it totally disrupts the liturgical day? Don't forget there is the entire divine office which comprises the church's liturgy.
@@Gratiamtuam no you are mistaken. The Easter Vigil was never a vespers service. It was always a Vigil which means it took place during the darkness of night . It included the singing of psalms, scriptures, baptisms, confirmation, the Mass of Easter and the reception of Easter Communion. It ended at sunrise with the singing of lauds. This is exactly how the apostolic fathers describe the celebration of Easter. Look it up! St Augustine “ We gather during the night and keep vigil for the resurrection.” The Orthodox have an earlier Vespers service, but the resurrection service takes place at midnight. While it no longer includes baptism and confirmation it is a Matin service (Vigil ) followed by the Easter Liturgy during the night. Lastly, the canonical hours need to be prayed at the proper time. It is absolute foolishness to sing about the setting of the sun as the sun is rising in the morning!
@@giovanniserafino1731 The easter vigil is a vigil yes, but it is not the equivelant to the matins of easter. Resurrection matins in the west has it's own service. Are you really going to claim the easter vigil has never been a vesperal mass? The time of the service may well be later once it is dark, this I do not have any major objection to. But it is NOT the first mass of easter! What you describe is what was the calabration of resurrection matins, which was still a major celebration in the medieval western church. If you read modernmedievalism.blogspot.com/2015/04/Easter-Vigil-at-night.html you will see the description of a separate matins service. Lastly, if you'll claim it is foolishness to sing about the setting of the sun as the sun is rising in the morning, will you also concede that if the tenebrae services are celebrated at the proper hour named in the 1955 holy week reforms they will not be celebrated in darkness, losing the whole symbolism of tenebrae (meaning shadows)?
@@Gratiamtuam it is extremely difficult dealing with people like yourself who find absolutely nothing wrong with singing Vespers, an evening service at sunset , at 7:00 a.m. The divine office is meant to sanctify the hours of the day at the proper time. You are like individuals who believe, despite the reality that 2 plus 2 equal 4 Insist, that 2+ 2,equal 140! How do you deal with such people? You reject the ancient liturgical traditions, and prefer to appeal to questionable monastic usages of the Medieval period which developed as abuses, and which during post Tridentine times became codified. For you the Church exists only from 1562 to 1955, Any liturgical practices or insights before or after has no meaning or significance because you have placed blinders on reason and history. In rejecting Liturgical history and proper liturgical development as Pope Benedict XVI speaks of, you are basically a protestant who likes Latin and incense and lives in a world of liturgical fantasy. People like you, give traditionalist a bad name ! I have nothing more to say!
Living in Wisconsin under my Ordinary, Bishop Morlino has been so wonderful, however...
I miss Mater Ecclesiae like no other.
A friend coined the phrase," A Model Parish with A Model Priest" .
I couldn't have said it better. God love you Father Pasley and the wonderful parishioners of Mater Ecclesiae . You will always be in my daily prayers and in my heart.
Glad to see you’re doing the pre 55!
Pre 1955!! Yes!!
Not sure what the excitement is about. The 1955 changes are valid and promulgated by Pope Pius XII. Refusing to obey the Chair of St. Peter makes one no different than the protestants.
Pre-1955 Holy Week is permitted by Rome: www.ccwatershed.org/blog/2018/apr/2/pre-1955-holy-week-permission-from-rome/
Moses King the chair of St. Peter said that a gay man was made that way by god. Either your pope is not mentally sound, or he isn’t in mouth piece of god, and you need to become orthodox.
@@Православл try a little humility. You can't choose what is true, you need to choose where the source of truth is. But then you've got to stick to that.
Moses King
1955 changes are of modernist! After 1954, Pope Pius XII had become sick, he had nightmare and exhaust his body , the modernist had taken advantage of this.
Oh how I pray many rosaries for return to th TLM th lovely Latin Tridentine mass
Beautiful chanting
A lot of ill-informed comments-thanks to Bugnini and Company.
Awesome Easter vigil latin mass
Fr pat Perez in orange California diocese talks bout important pre55 mass
Th Sensum Fidelium group is lifesaver
This is much better than Novus Ordo Liturgy
As far as I am aware, the Holy See has ordered a celebration time introduced by Pius XII
As far as I am aware, the time of liturgy is a rubrical matter. The traditional liturgy has its own rubrics, independent from the "restored" rubrics.
@@larryjohnwong And the authority of the Church may order a different time of celebration. just as one of the prayers of Good Friday was changed by Benedict XVI
WHO COMPOSED THE KYRIE!!!???
It sounds like Palestrina or another another Renaissance composer of sacred polyphony
Berlin jersey s there with prof Albert Einstein’s friends at Princeton univ
In everyday reality our Roman Catholic Church is now sedevantism held up
This truly is a great endeavor, wonderfully produced. Why would parents bring a baby who should be in bed to any long services that may sound like I am and old faddy daddy how ever Its not fair to the baby or the faithful ARE BABY SITTERS expensive. I wish could come to Mater Ecc more often. GOD Bless Fr. Pasley and the fine folks of Mater Ecclesiae.
Anyone present for such a Holy Mass receives many graces and benefits for their soul, babies included. The parents are allowing a great good for their children in having them present. "A Mass that is not crying is a Mass that is dying."
MYOB
Whose composition is the Kyrie? Simply sublime
I was also asking the same question
who composed the Kyrie?
Scarlatti, Miss brevis "la stella"
@@oneperson9708 God bless you! Ive been looking for someone to know who composed the kyrie and I've been searching for that for years.
may you please tell me who composed the kyrie? please.
Here is a link to the music from the 2017 Mass: www.materecclesiae.org/music-list-for-the-2017-assumption-mass/
@@SRose-kg2kk This is the music for an Assumption mass, not Holy Saturday.
2:25:21
Gloria in execelsis deo!
This central Florida is so woefully Protestant
12:53
Hate to nitpick, but even the Novus Ordo guidelines go out of their way to make it abundantly clear that the whole thing should begin after (at least) the end of civil twilight. The Easter Vigil should never begin in the afternoon.
Clay McDermott Inform yourself, imbecile.
You’re correct. The Church said it should begin in the morning of Holy Saturday!
Sarto2010, calling a fellow Catholic an "imbecile " for holding another liturgical point of view, isn't very christlike or charitable. Unfortunately, such comments give traditionalists like yourself a well-deserved ,but very bad reputation.
Giovanni Serafino, Bugnini would be proud of you!
From Mater Ecclesiae Chapel: The Easter Vigil is a Vesperal service; that is, it is properly celebrated in the late afternoon/evening between the Hours of None and Vespers, with a short Vespers at the end of the Vigil Mass. It is an evening service, not a nocturnal one. The Vigil and Mass of Holy Saturday are a proper Liturgy to Holy Saturday itself for the purpose of receiving Catechumens into the Church and keeping watch; it is not the celebration of the Resurrection, although the joy thereof begins to be anticipated. The Mass lacks Propers, the Credo, and the Kiss of Peace in addition to the lack of candles borne at the Gospel; all of these omissions are indicative that it is not a Mass of Sunday and that we are still awaiting the Resurrection. The "First" (and only) Mass of the Resurrection is that of Easter Sunday morning.
Nowhere in Tradition did Easter ever have a "First Mass at Midnight" the way Christmas does, until such a novelty was invented in 1951-1955. The traditional and true nocturnal service of Easter is Paschal Matins and Lauds which begins the actual celebration of the Resurrection.
I have to travel down 4 to Orlando then over th turnpike all 140 mi to bp Donaldson s church no of St. Petersburg
The ‘Lumen Christi’ procession with the Paschal Candle wasn’t allowed in the pre-55 Vigil. Why is it done here?
Kurt Gödel really?
Breki cpt I believe it wasn’t done in the old days.
Kurt Gödel fascinating
Kurt Gödel You’re right but also not - it wasn’t done with the *Paschal* Candle. It was done with the 3-branched candle, as it is done in this video. I have a pre-55 Missal, and the procession with the ‘Lumen Christi’ was done as in the video.
Dennis Vu forgive me you are right.
I prefer it here in port orange with rats lizards snakes gators birds an sharks
To celebrate the Easter Vigil, which in the ancient liturgical tradition of the Catholic Church takes place at night and not under the fullness of the noonday sun as shown here is an aberration. Unfortunately, this is an attempt by some traditional religious communities and others to reject any type of liturgical development or even restoration of a proper ancient usage. As a traditionalist, I applaud the 1955 liturgical changes particularly the restoration of the proper liturgical times.
Giovanni Serafino
No, it has been tradition in Roman rite for more than 1000 years to celebrate Easter Vigil in the morning of Holy Saturday. 1955 changes are of modernist, many people forget that Pope Pius XII had become sick after 1954 to the point he consider resigning, Bugnini and his company had taken advantage of this.
The Easter Vigil has always been a Vesperal Mass, and if you were to 'truly' restore the timing it would still take place with reasonable light outside because Vespers is the evening prayer, not the night prayer of the church. The holy week reforms of 1955 removed first vespers of easter and changed the mass to a 'lauds' mass. The first mass of easter is Easter sunday, not the easter vigil. Even the Orthodox celebrate their easter vigil in the morning or afternoon of Holy Saturday. How can you call this a restoration of proper ancient usage when it totally disrupts the liturgical day? Don't forget there is the entire divine office which comprises the church's liturgy.
@@Gratiamtuam no you are mistaken. The Easter Vigil was never a vespers service. It was always a Vigil which means it took place during the darkness of night . It included the singing of psalms, scriptures, baptisms, confirmation, the Mass of Easter and the reception of Easter Communion. It ended at sunrise with the singing of lauds. This is exactly how the apostolic fathers describe the celebration of Easter. Look it up! St Augustine “ We gather during the night and keep vigil for the resurrection.” The Orthodox have an earlier Vespers service, but the resurrection service takes place at midnight. While it no longer includes baptism and confirmation it is a Matin service (Vigil ) followed by the Easter Liturgy during the night. Lastly, the canonical hours need to be prayed at the proper time. It is absolute foolishness to sing about the setting of the sun as the sun is rising in the morning!
@@giovanniserafino1731 The easter vigil is a vigil yes, but it is not the equivelant to the matins of easter. Resurrection matins in the west has it's own service. Are you really going to claim the easter vigil has never been a vesperal mass? The time of the service may well be later once it is dark, this I do not have any major objection to. But it is NOT the first mass of easter! What you describe is what was the calabration of resurrection matins, which was still a major celebration in the medieval western church. If you read modernmedievalism.blogspot.com/2015/04/Easter-Vigil-at-night.html you will see the description of a separate matins service. Lastly, if you'll claim it is foolishness to sing about the setting of the sun as the sun is rising in the morning, will you also concede that if the tenebrae services are celebrated at the proper hour named in the 1955 holy week reforms they will not be celebrated in darkness, losing the whole symbolism of tenebrae (meaning shadows)?
@@Gratiamtuam it is extremely difficult dealing with people like yourself who find absolutely nothing wrong with singing Vespers, an evening service at sunset , at 7:00 a.m. The divine office is meant to sanctify the hours of the day at the proper time. You are like individuals who believe, despite the reality that 2 plus 2 equal 4 Insist, that 2+ 2,equal 140! How do you deal with such people? You reject the ancient liturgical traditions, and prefer to appeal to questionable monastic usages of the Medieval period which developed as abuses, and which during post Tridentine times became codified. For you the Church exists only from 1562 to 1955, Any liturgical practices or insights before or after has no meaning or significance because you have placed blinders on reason and history. In rejecting Liturgical history and proper liturgical development as Pope Benedict XVI speaks of, you are basically a protestant who likes Latin and incense and lives in a world of liturgical fantasy. People like you, give traditionalist a bad name ! I have nothing more to say!
Who know work of great Austrian theologian canon Greg Hesse? Very few take time to be aware
SSPX in Sanford has Latin liturgy every day but they don’t throw out horrid vat2
sspx liturgy is illict but one could always attend an fssp church.
Ave Maria FSSP is gay
?????
Easter vigil priest wrong bout modernist antipope Francisco
2:57:57
2:19:13
3:32:40
3:05:26
2:25:20
gave me chills
3:08:02
3:35:24
2:04:24
3:44:51