Excellent video. You've explained this topic in an easy to understand way (which helps because I'm reasonably sure we're doing this practical tomorrow). Thanks!
Yes, this is also very interesting. What would happen? I can't find an experiment investigating the relationship between the length of the string and its fundamental frequency :(
What if instead of using only the mass in the graph the tension is used instead. Meaning that the new formula to get M(mue) would be M(mue)=[1/(4L^2 * gradient of graph)] or if using exact values M(mue) = [T/(4L^2*f^2)]. Would that also work?
![[UNCUT] The Loyal Pin ปิ่นภักดิ์ EP.4 (4/4)](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/d3l5rxl5CVo/mqdefault.jpg)
![[TH] 2024 PMSL SEA W3D1 | Fall | สัปดาห์ตัดสิน ทีมไปไฟนอล](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/ZBU3GyzqErI/mqdefault.jpg)
Oh wow this what u look like. Legend
Excellent video. You've explained this topic in an easy to understand way (which helps because I'm reasonably sure we're doing this practical tomorrow). Thanks!
Cheers mate this helped a lot
Thank you 🙏 😭
25% error seems rather large.
how would you investigate the effect of length and mass per unit length on the fundamental frequency?
Yes, this is also very interesting. What would happen? I can't find an experiment investigating the relationship between the length of the string and its fundamental frequency :(
very helpful thank you so much!!
Thank you.
what if you changed the length?
What if instead of using only the mass in the graph the tension is used instead. Meaning that the new formula to get M(mue) would be M(mue)=[1/(4L^2 * gradient of graph)] or if using exact values M(mue) = [T/(4L^2*f^2)]. Would that also work?
pls be my teacher.
come to malmesbury then
which alternative apparatus can be used in place of the signal generator?