Quantum Mechanics Explained in Ridiculously Simple Words

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 7 ก.ค. 2024
  • Quantum physics deals with the foundation of our world - the electrons in an atom, the protons inside the nucleus, the quarks that build those protons, and the photons that we perceive as light. These constitute everything that we are made of, both matter and energy. But how is it any different from regular physics? The 'regular' physics is the physics that deals with Newton’s laws of motion and its related mechanics. This is more formally called Classical Physics.
    This is the physics of our day-to-day lives-the rolling of balls, the rotation of the earth, and the mechanics of engines. Quantum physics deals with particles that are incredibly small and hence, the laws of classical physics don’t apply in this world. In this video, we discuss the meaning of quantum physics and how is it going to change how we perceive the world around us.
    #quantumphysics #quantummechanics #quantumworld
    References:
    scienceexchange.caltech.edu/t...
    www.insidescience.org/second-...
    link.springer.com/chapter/10....
    Original Article Link: www.scienceabc.com/pure-scien...
    If you wish to buy/license this video, please write to us at admin@scienceabc.com.
    Voice Over Artist: John Staughton ( www.fiverr.com/jswildwood )
    SUBSCRIBE to get more such science videos!
    / @scienceabc
    Follow us on Twitter!
    / abc_science
    Follow us on Facebook!
    / sciabc
    Follow us on Instagram!
    / scienceabcofficial
    Follow us on LinkedIn!
    / scienceabc
    Follow our Website!
    www.scienceabc.com
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 207

  • @freshgino
    @freshgino 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +101

    Just finished the video! So what exactly is quantum mechanics?

    • @Nothing-bz3io
      @Nothing-bz3io 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Exactly 😂

    • @sarthak7708
      @sarthak7708 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      The study and research of how particles of matter behave at an atomic [extremely tiny] level is called quantum physics[I guess]

    • @larryslemp9698
      @larryslemp9698 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That's hilarious!!

    • @paytronmathis9604
      @paytronmathis9604 11 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Truer sentiments have never been spoken! 😂🤣🤣😂

  • @Nothing-bz3io
    @Nothing-bz3io 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +30

    The animation and sound effects were so good, I forgot to understand.

  • @Celestiallearn1162
    @Celestiallearn1162 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

    I'll provide brief explanations for each of the 100 topics in quantum physics:
    1. Wave-particle duality: Dual nature of matter and energy, where they exhibit both wave-like and particle-like behaviors.
    2. Quantum superposition: State of a system being in multiple states simultaneously until measured.
    3. Quantum entanglement: Phenomenon where particles become correlated in such a way that the state of one instantaneously affects the state of the other, regardless of distance.
    4. Uncertainty principle: Principle formulated by Heisenberg stating that the more precisely the position of a particle is known, the less precisely its momentum can be known, and vice versa.
    5. Schrödinger equation: Fundamental equation of quantum mechanics describing how the wavefunction of a physical system evolves over time.
    6. Quantum tunneling: Phenomenon where particles penetrate through a potential energy barrier that they classically shouldn't be able to overcome.
    7. Quantum interference: Effect where waves combine to either reinforce or cancel each other out.
    8. Quantum decoherence: Process by which quantum systems interact with their environment, leading to the loss of coherence and the emergence of classical behavior.
    9. Quantum teleportation: Transfer of quantum information from one location to another without physical movement of the information carrier.
    10. Quantum cryptography: Use of quantum mechanical properties to perform cryptographic tasks such as secure communication.
    11. Quantum computing: Use of quantum-mechanical phenomena to perform operations on data, potentially enabling much faster computation than classical computers.
    12. Bell's theorem: Theoretical result stating that certain quantum predictions cannot be reproduced by any theory based on classical realism.
    13. EPR paradox: Thought experiment proposed by Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen to highlight what they saw as the incompleteness of quantum mechanics.
    14. Quantum measurement problem: Philosophical issue in quantum mechanics concerning the nature of wavefunction collapse upon measurement.
    15. Quantum non-locality: Property of quantum mechanics where particles can be correlated in ways that cannot be explained by classical physics.
    16. Quantum information theory: Study of the properties and processing of information in quantum systems.
    17. Quantum entanglement swapping: Process where the entanglement between two particles is transferred to two other particles, even if they never directly interacted.
    18. Quantum key distribution: Method for secure communication based on the principles of quantum mechanics.
    19. Quantum teleportation protocol: Step-by-step procedure for transferring the quantum state of one particle to another distant particle.
    20. Quantum error correction: Techniques for protecting quantum information from errors introduced by noise and other disturbances.
    21. Quantum gates: Basic building blocks of quantum circuits, analogous to classical logic gates.
    22. Quantum algorithms: Algorithms designed to run on quantum computers, potentially offering exponential speedup over classical algorithms.
    23. Quantum annealing: Optimization technique that leverages quantum effects to find the global minimum of a given objective function.
    24. Quantum entanglement distillation: Process of purifying an entangled state to increase its fidelity and usefulness for quantum communication.
    25. Quantum teleportation network: Network of quantum devices interconnected by teleportation links for quantum communication.
    26. Quantum communication: Communication using quantum systems, often leveraging properties like entanglement and superposition for security and efficiency.
    27. Quantum supremacy: Demonstration of a quantum computer outperforming the most powerful classical computers for a specific task.
    28. Quantum phase transitions: Transitions between different phases of matter driven by quantum fluctuations rather than thermal energy.
    29. Quantum walk: Quantum-mechanical analog of classical random walks, with applications in quantum algorithms and simulations.
    30. Quantum field theory: Framework combining quantum mechanics and special relativity to describe fundamental particles and their interactions.
    31. Second quantization: Formalism for quantizing systems with an infinite number of particles, commonly used in quantum field theory.
    32. Quantum electrodynamics (QED): Quantum field theory describing the interactions between electromagnetic fields and charged particles.
    33. Quantum chromodynamics (QCD): Quantum field theory describing the strong force that binds quarks together to form hadrons.
    34. Standard Model of particle physics: Theory describing the electromagnetic, weak, and strong nuclear interactions, as well as the Higgs mechanism.
    35. Quantum gravity: Theoretical framework aiming to reconcile general relativity and quantum mechanics to describe gravitational interactions at a fundamental level.
    36. String theory: Theoretical framework attempting to unify all fundamental forces and particles by modeling them as one-dimensional "strings."
    37. M-theory: Extension of string theory that includes 11 dimensions and various types of extended objects beyond strings.
    38. Loop quantum gravity: Approach to quantum gravity that quantizes space-time using techniques from loop quantum mechanics.
    39. AdS/CFT correspondence: Duality between a theory of gravity in anti-de Sitter space and a conformal field theory on its boundary.
    40. Quantum black holes: Hypothetical black holes whose properties are described using both quantum mechanics and general relativity.
    41. Quantum cosmology: Application of quantum mechanics to the study of the origin, evolution, and structure of the universe.
    42. Quantum foam: Hypothetical structure of space-time at extremely small scales, where quantum fluctuations cause it to fluctuate wildly.
    43. Quantum spin: Intrinsic angular momentum of elementary particles, which can take discrete values.
    44. Quantum spin Hall effect: Topological phenomenon where an insulating material conducts electricity along its edges due to quantum spin properties.
    45. Quantum Hall effect: Phenomenon where the Hall resistance of a two-dimensional electron gas exhibits quantized plateaus in the presence of a magnetic field.
    46. Fractional quantum Hall effect: Quantum Hall effect observed at low temperatures and strong magnetic fields, where the Hall resistance exhibits fractional plateaus.
    47. Quantum dot: Nanoscale semiconductor structure that confines charge carriers in all three dimensions, exhibiting quantum mechanical properties.
    48. Quantum well: Thin semiconductor layer that confines charge carriers in one dimension, creating discrete energy levels.
    49. Quantum wire: Nanoscale semiconductor structure that confines charge carriers in two dimensions, facilitating quantum transport phenomena.
    50. Quantum point contact: Narrow constriction in a conducting material that exhibits quantized conductance due to quantum mechanical effects.
    51. Quantum ring: Nanoscale semiconductor structure that forms a closed loop, allowing the confinement and manipulation of charge carriers.
    52. Quantum cascade laser: Semiconductor laser based on quantum mechanical principles, typically used for mid-infrared spectroscopy and sensing.
    53. Quantum entanglement in condensed matter systems: Generation and manipulation of entangled states in solid-state materials for quantum information processing.
    54. Quantum dots in nanotechnology: Use of quantum dots for various nanotechnological applications, such as sensors, displays, and biomedical imaging.
    55. Quantum phase transitions in condensed matter systems: Transitions between different phases of matter driven by quantum fluctuations at low temperatures.
    56. Bose-Einstein condensate (BEC): State of matter where a dilute gas of bosons coalesces into the same quantum state at extremely low temperatures.
    57. Degenerate Fermi gas: Gas of fermions at low temperatures, where the Pauli exclusion principle forces them into higher energy states.
    58. Ultracold atoms: Atoms cooled to temperatures near absolute zero, allowing the observation of quantum phenomena such as BEC and quantum gases.
    59. Rydberg atoms: Atoms in highly excited electronic states, exhibiting exaggerated quantum behavior and long-range interactions.
    60. Spintronics: Field of research exploring the manipulation of electron spin in solid-state devices for information processing and storage.
    61. Quantum

    • @lepidoptera9337
      @lepidoptera9337 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Wow, that was a huge load of bullshit. ;-)

    • @Imatom01010
      @Imatom01010 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hi bro😊

    • @Outthebox96
      @Outthebox96 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Nerd

    • @jonasaboagye9229
      @jonasaboagye9229 19 วันที่ผ่านมา

      You’re a genius!

  • @missmerrily4830
    @missmerrily4830 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    I really need this level of explanation of Quantum Physics. Much more and I glaze over. But isn't it the most mind-blowing thought that Gautama Buddha, alive 500 years before Christ, perfectly understood that there is no permanent 'me' or anything else. And observed it without any equipment or experiments.

    • @hitrapperandartistdababy
      @hitrapperandartistdababy 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Well I mean, this is very borderline philosohpy so it makes sense that certain thinkers of the past can correlate to this

  • @fasmallville
    @fasmallville ปีที่แล้ว +22

    Loved the video and the explanation using "real" examples! Great job, Scott!

  • @Robert08010
    @Robert08010 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    I tried to make a joke to a group of scientifically literate friends. I brought up the subject of Schrodinger cat. Then I said, "Being sealed in a box with a tin of poison is not a superposition to be in." Nobody got it.

    • @HighMojo
      @HighMojo 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Your friends are also in a state of superposition as they may or may not understand, because they may or may not be quantum literate, or even if they do, they may or may not care, therefore they may or may not laugh.

    • @Robert08010
      @Robert08010 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Well, you raise an interesting possibility but it was more the opposite. This group was mostly PhDs. They were so hyper focused on actually understanding the theoretical idea behind "Shrodinger's Cat", they missed the joke entirely. It's like I invented a cloaking device. BTW, what is a coat rack... but a cloaking device? LOL Why they let me hang around I don't know. @@HighMojo

    • @robnation2475
      @robnation2475 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      It's safer for them not to laugh whether they understood the joke or not. A moan and a small smile would have been nice to at least acknowledge that you had attempted a joke.

  • @Knesquik
    @Knesquik 17 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    As an instructor, I would never use fake concepts like superhero movies to explain a real world concept like quantum mechanics

    • @7dcht
      @7dcht ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

      "real world concept like quantum mechanics" I thought you were talking about real concepts?

  • @sammosoaker10
    @sammosoaker10 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    This video explained both everything and nothing

  • @andrewmarcellus1278
    @andrewmarcellus1278 2 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Would love a video explaining quarks. Keep the content coming!!

    • @mikekolokowsky
      @mikekolokowsky 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Quark was a short lived sci fi TV show that parodied Trek and Star Wars in the late 1970s starring Richard Benjamin. Also a Ferengi bartender on Deep Space 9. What did you hope to learn?

    • @LiveLaughLoveLightYagami
      @LiveLaughLoveLightYagami 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@mikekolokowskyquarks are theoretical little balls or something google it I can’t remember what it was completely

  • @ChoobChoob
    @ChoobChoob 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    "“If you think you understand quantum mechanics, you don't understand quantum mechanics.”
    So i'm in a superposition of both knowing and not knowing Quantum Mechanics?

    • @schmetterling4477
      @schmetterling4477 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Wow... you are the first person I have seen online who actually noticed that Feynman made a (poor) joke about superposition there! Congrats. You have a sense of humor. :-)

    • @kalmanjulianne
      @kalmanjulianne 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@schmetterling4477 Feyman was a smart man and he didn't understand for a good reason, the concept is a fraud.

  • @vincenzofumarola2813
    @vincenzofumarola2813 2 ปีที่แล้ว +38

    Hi science ABC. Could you do a video on Loop quantum gravity. Other youtubers explain in a very complicated way, but maybe your explanation might be better

    • @Scienceabc
      @Scienceabc  2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Great suggestion!

  • @HudsonBay23
    @HudsonBay23 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +37

    I learned nothing.

    • @Tenelocan
      @Tenelocan หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      No way u expected to learn quantum mechanics in a 10minute video, a 10min video is at best a trailer or a small glimpse into just a subject

    • @emmamuthoor3463
      @emmamuthoor3463 หลายเดือนก่อน

      😂😂😂😂😂 at least tried

    • @kalmanjulianne
      @kalmanjulianne 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      You most certainly learned something important. Superposition / quantum physics is an elaborate and deliberate fraud.

  • @naveedsegments
    @naveedsegments 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Thanks buddy. Love you. Continue to encourage beings ...towards my Quantum mechanics😊

    • @Scienceabc
      @Scienceabc  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Always!

  • @ronnymartin7499
    @ronnymartin7499 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Any chance on getting a video on the Pauli exclusion principle if it is possible to attempt to simplify it lol😮

  • @Webedunn
    @Webedunn 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Particles seem to be aware of what’s going on. They can travel back in time to change an outcome. The double slit experiment is truly bizarre.

    • @rickhibdon11
      @rickhibdon11 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Indeed. We know it works. It's easily proven at home in a dark room.. But we don't know how

  • @bizarredude9735
    @bizarredude9735 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Love how he changed the levels

  • @thedivinityofart
    @thedivinityofart 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I loved the pictures and animations used while explaining

    • @Scienceabc
      @Scienceabc  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Glad you enjoyed it!

  • @mohitdhanik5274
    @mohitdhanik5274 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    That was Amazing😍 love from 🇮🇳

  • @enesevki
    @enesevki 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    An amazing video again! Thanks for the effort

    • @Scienceabc
      @Scienceabc  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Glad you enjoyed it!

  • @yassineesspg
    @yassineesspg ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Your explanations are so good bro, thanks for your videos ! ❤️

    • @Scienceabc
      @Scienceabc  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Glad you think so!

  • @l71291
    @l71291 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Well that was interesting 👍🏻

    • @Scienceabc
      @Scienceabc  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Glad you think so!

  • @adamzain8191
    @adamzain8191 19 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Superposition is just 100% accuracy in 2 different state at the same time

  • @miEye1
    @miEye1 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    What a great video!

    • @Scienceabc
      @Scienceabc  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Glad you liked it!

  • @smaug.the.stupendous
    @smaug.the.stupendous ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Finaly I understand that I will never understand quantum mechanics.

  • @vna4t
    @vna4t 6 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Thank you

  • @theremnant957
    @theremnant957 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Quantum mechanics is a fundamental theory in physics that describes the behavior of nature at and below the scale of atoms.[2]: 1.1  It is the foundation of all quantum physics, which includes quantum chemistry, quantum field theory, quantum technology, and quantum information science.
    Quantum mechanics can describe many systems that classical physics cannot. Classical physics can describe many aspects of nature at an ordinary (macroscopic and (optical) microscopic) scale, but is not sufficient for describing them at very small submicroscopic (atomic and subatomic) scales. Most theories in classical physics can be derived from quantum mechanics as an approximation valid at large (macroscopic/microscopic) scale.[3]
    Quantum systems have bound states that are quantized to discrete values of energy, momentum, angular momentum, and other quantities, in contrast to classical systems where these quantities can be measured continuously. Measurements of quantum systems show characteristics of both particles and waves (wave-particle duality), and there are limits to how accurately the value of a physical quantity can be predicted prior to its measurement, given a complete set of initial conditions (the uncertainty principle).
    Quantum mechanics arose gradually from theories to explain observations that could not be reconciled with classical physics, such as Max Planck's solution in 1900 to the black-body radiation problem, and the correspondence between energy and frequency in Albert Einstein's 1905 paper, which explained the photoelectric effect. These early attempts to understand microscopic phenomena, now known as the "old quantum theory", led to the full development of quantum mechanics in the mid-1920s by Niels Bohr, Erwin Schrödinger, Werner Heisenberg, Max Born, Paul Dirac and others. The modern theory is formulated in various specially developed mathematical formalisms. In one of them, a mathematical entity called the wave function provides information, in the form of probability amplitudes, about what measurements of a particle's energy, momentum, and other physical properties may yield.
    Overview and fundamental concepts
    Quantum mechanics allows the calculation of properties and behaviour of physical systems. It is typically applied to microscopic systems: molecules, atoms and sub-atomic particles. It has been demonstrated to hold for complex molecules with thousands of atoms,[4] but its application to human beings raises philosophical problems, such as Wigner's friend, and its application to the universe as a whole remains speculative.[5] Predictions of quantum mechanics have been verified experimentally to an extremely high degree of accuracy. For example, the refinement of quantum mechanics for the interaction of light and matter, known as quantum electrodynamics (QED), has been shown to agree with experiment to within 1 part in 1012 when predicting the magnetic properties of an electron.[6]
    A fundamental feature of the theory is that it usually cannot predict with certainty what will happen, but only give probabilities. Mathematically, a probability is found by taking the square of the absolute value of a complex number, known as a probability amplitude. This is known as the Born rule, named after physicist Max Born. For example, a quantum particle like an electron can be described by a wave function, which associates to each point in space a probability amplitude. Applying the Born rule to these amplitudes gives a probability density function for the position that the electron will be found to have when an experiment is performed to measure it. This is the best the theory can do; it cannot say for certain where the electron will be found. The Schrödinger equation relates the collection of probability amplitudes that pertain to one moment of time to the collection of probability amplitudes that pertain to another.[7]: 67-87 
    One consequence of the mathematical rules of quantum mechanics is a tradeoff in predictability between different measurable quantities. The most famous form of this uncertainty principle says that no matter how a quantum particle is prepared or how carefully experiments upon it are arranged, it is impossible to have a precise prediction for a measurement of its position and also at the same time for a measurement of its momentum.[7]: 427-435 
    Another consequence of the mathematical rules of quantum mechanics is the phenomenon of quantum interference, which is often illustrated with the double-slit experiment. In the basic version of this experiment, a coherent light source, such as a laser beam, illuminates a plate pierced by two parallel slits, and the light passing through the slits is observed on a screen behind the plate.[8]: 102-111 [2]: 1.1-1.8  The wave nature of light causes the light waves passing through the two slits to interfere, producing bright and dark bands on the screen - a result that would not be expected if light consisted of classical particles.[8] However, the light is always found to be absorbed at the screen at discrete points, as individual particles rather than waves; the interference pattern appears via the varying density of these particle hits on the screen. Furthermore, versions of the experiment that include detectors at the slits find that each detected photon passes through one slit (as would a classical particle), and not through both slits (as would a wave).[8]: 109 [9][10] However, such experiments demonstrate that particles do not form the interference pattern if one detects which slit they pass through. This behavior is known as wave-particle duality. In addition to light, electrons, atoms, and molecules are all found to exhibit the same dual behavior when fired towards a double slit.[2]
    Another non-classical phenomenon predicted by quantum mechanics is quantum tunnelling: a particle that goes up against a potential barrier can cross it, even if its kinetic energy is smaller than the maximum of the potential.[11] In classical mechanics this particle would be trapped. Quantum tunnelling has several important consequences, enabling radioactive decay, nuclear fusion in stars, and applications such as scanning tunnelling microscopy,tunnel diode and tunnel field-effect transistor.[12][13]

    • @Batman11266
      @Batman11266 14 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Wikipedia article ehh?

  • @Duecemoney1
    @Duecemoney1 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I hate how much I would've learned in school, had my classes broke it down further, like this video. Thank you ❤

    • @Scienceabc
      @Scienceabc  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      thanks a lot

  • @riteshthahryani
    @riteshthahryani 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    nice videos, i have 1 question which software do you use for animations ..?

    • @Scienceabc
      @Scienceabc  2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      We use Adobe Animate for making these videos.

  • @anuragpanja6569
    @anuragpanja6569 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    The deadpool cameos were epic lmao🤣

  • @icegiant1000
    @icegiant1000 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    This explained nothing.

    • @AndreM37
      @AndreM37 หลายเดือนก่อน

      😅😅😅

  • @nimo517
    @nimo517 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Anyone get 1-2 mins through and realize they don’t really care?
    Rewatch the whole thing over and over… you will. it’s worth it.

  • @lifenreviews
    @lifenreviews 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    this turned into analog horror

  • @Chris-fv6yr
    @Chris-fv6yr 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    THERE IS MIDDLE GROUND. WHETHER DEAD OR ALIVE, THE CAT STILL EXISTS

    • @lepidoptera9337
      @lepidoptera9337 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You are wrong about even that. So was Schroedinger. :-)

  • @user-gr3oo5ux9x
    @user-gr3oo5ux9x 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you.great sci fi.

    • @Scienceabc
      @Scienceabc  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Glad you enjoyed it

  • @GabrielPurusha
    @GabrielPurusha 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Maybe the other dimension that we need in quantum phisics îs the consciousness that îs aware of matter and subatomic particles,our own consciousness

  • @blkspade23
    @blkspade23 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I though I misheard it the 1st time, but he definitely said "Adead or Alive". Lol

  • @rajeshkadam8345
    @rajeshkadam8345 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Video was good but you not told about maharshi kanak who was provides the theory of atom in their vedas

  • @mxhannadg
    @mxhannadg หลายเดือนก่อน

    thank you! i'm more confuse now 😭😭😭😭

    • @Scienceabc
      @Scienceabc  หลายเดือนก่อน

      oh no, how come?

  • @TMJDesignCo
    @TMJDesignCo 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Wait, why was that marvel studios writers’ room full of family guy characters?

  • @Ont785
    @Ont785 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How come nobody ever talks about what the monitoring device is? I don’t mean the screen in the background, I mean what is actually used to look at the photons creating this phenomenon.

    • @lepidoptera9337
      @lepidoptera9337 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's an irreversible energy absorber. This follows trivially from classical physics, we just don't teach very often why and how it does that.

  • @santhiyasanthiya8010
    @santhiyasanthiya8010 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Tamil explanation video podunga sir

  • @billihawk368
    @billihawk368 10 วันที่ผ่านมา

    So its Omnipresent and Allmighty?

  • @tejasgudi1169
    @tejasgudi1169 ปีที่แล้ว +209

    Hey the content is good but can you please stop the irrelevant animations and texts on the screen, it is very distracting.

    • @NoosaHeads
      @NoosaHeads ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Agreed.
      I know the presenter is trying to make quantum physics intelligible to the layman but this video sounded (and looked) like something Kamilla Harris would have offered up.
      (Just the cackling was missing).

    • @anodynos6398
      @anodynos6398 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I loved that

    • @trevienseager1755
      @trevienseager1755 ปีที่แล้ว +46

      The animations and texts fit this video what are you talking about? It was relevant

    • @ggvbayareaoakland5914
      @ggvbayareaoakland5914 ปีที่แล้ว +31

      Why don't you just read a book then, you know? Lol

    • @azure1305
      @azure1305 ปีที่แล้ว +30

      No! Don't stop the irrelevant animations, they are the only reason I and a bunch of other subscribers too are here :)

  • @DEEKXXL
    @DEEKXXL 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wait a second I get it now a Deadpool is not actually without motion

  • @jaceylynmanning8633
    @jaceylynmanning8633 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So are all the parallel universes sharing the same electrons and we're constantly like flickering with trading electrons with our parallel reality. Like those old flicker films

  • @virendalal1684
    @virendalal1684 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    nice

  • @ongkaifoong1287
    @ongkaifoong1287 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    what do u mean

  • @EddieLeal
    @EddieLeal 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Conscious observer collapses the wave and creates one reality or the other. 🤷🏻‍♂

  • @tylorkrieger8609
    @tylorkrieger8609 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How does the ability of a particle having multiple possible locations mean that reality could be different?

    • @hitrapperandartistdababy
      @hitrapperandartistdababy 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      So as I understood it, (and I literally just watched it myself so I have no idea if I’m right) if a particle can exist in 2 different distinct stages, it would lend credence to the theory that both states of this particle are their own seperate interpetation of reality. We know where the particle should be in a place but at the same time it can be a different place and should be a different place from another alternate reality.
      Only thing I’m certain of is that it is merely a theory at this stage.
      Maybe this can simplify it: Imagine a quantum car. Since quantum physiqs the car exists both in the parking lot basement and the top floor at the same time, yet you can only see and predict the car to be in the parking lot, therefore an alternate reality of you would see the car on the rooftop.
      (Anyone smarter than me please correct me if I missed the mark completely!!! 😅)

    • @lepidoptera9337
      @lepidoptera9337 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Particles don't have different locations. More precisely, particles do not even exist for all we know. Nobody has ever seen one. What we are observing are exchanges of quanta of energy between physical systems, but because "shut up and calculate" works for most users science is not self correcting with regards to teaching the wrong ontology. Most physicists never notice that they have been taught wrong and so they continue teaching wrongly.

  • @shellicate
    @shellicate 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I like the Deadpool..
    And the BTTF DeLorean...
    And the Avengers...

  • @MicheluceRizzuto
    @MicheluceRizzuto 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I can consider myself a pretty smart guy but I simply cannot wrap my head around quantum mechanics. Same difficulty with wrapping my head around the vastness of the universe and light years

    • @schmetterling4477
      @schmetterling4477 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They key is the following phrase: "A quantum is a small amount of energy.". Quantum mechanics does NOT describe how objects behave. It describes how energy is transferred between physical systems. Energy is not an object, hence it does not have to behave like an object. Mystery solved. The remainder is some fairly straight forward math.

    • @phildobson8705
      @phildobson8705 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Quantum physics proves that light is electromagnetic oscillations in the magnetic field.
      The magnetic field is not affected by the wall in your example
      What scientists are observing is one side of the oscillation on each side.
      Half a wavelength at light speed to "change sides" is undetectable by today's methods.
      Photon is a measurement (quantity) of energy. Not a particle.
      The measurement is not useful and has led to this fallacy that light is a particle.
      Quantum physics proves light is an oscillation in the magnetic field
      Quantum physics disproves Einstein on many counts. But to be fair other the great people have been disproved on many counts - Sigmund Freud ect!

  • @princeindrajitlawlaha7027
    @princeindrajitlawlaha7027 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great ~ ! 💝 💯 👏 🎉 🙏 🚀 👍 🤖 🎅 ✝ 🌝 !

  • @hitrapperandartistdababy
    @hitrapperandartistdababy 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So to sunmarize in simplest of terms: The laws of our world does not work in the quantum world. Particles can exist in seperate states simultaniously, which in Theory could prove the existence of a multiverse? The state of a particle in the quantum world is also affected by observation, Have I got it so far?

    • @lepidoptera9337
      @lepidoptera9337 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No, you got it completely wrong. One couldn't possibly be further from the facts than you are. For starters, there are no particles in quantum mechanics. Quanta are small amounts of energy. We try to teach this in high school, but basically nobody listens.

    • @hitrapperandartistdababy
      @hitrapperandartistdababy 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@lepidoptera9337 You don’t have to be condescending about it. I’m here trying to learn. You talk about how terrible the school system is which I agree with but then you belittle someone who knows less which is just as bad and also a reason why people don’t learn. Because they don’t wanna ask.

    • @lepidoptera9337
      @lepidoptera9337 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@hitrapperandartistdababy I am not condescending. It is merely a fact that I am painfully aware of because I didn't listen carefully enough in high school, either. Since I am a physics PhD I had an entire professional life to reflect about the disconnect between what we teach and what we remember. It turns out that a lot of the things we teach at the high school level are far more profound than we think. All of quantum mechanics makes a lot more sense if you can remember these 19 words:
      1) Energy is the ability of a system to perform work on another system. (13 words for the definition of energy.)
      and
      2) Quanta are small amounts of energy. (The most basic definition of "quantum".).
      The "strangeness" of quantum mechanics is a direct consequence of the human attempt to identify energy (a system property) with material objects (particles). Even the high school level treatment of the subject allows you to avoid that mistake completely. Properties are different from objects, even in classical systems. In the phrase "red car" we have one property (the color red) and one description of an object (car). Cars and colors don't behave the same. Cars can accelerate, they can change lanes and turn corners, they can even collide. Colors can't do any of that. Colors can mix, though, which cars can't.
      So, yeah... language matters a lot for the correct reasoning about reality. That's something that gets lost easily during the teaching of facts.
      The following may also sound condescending to you, but it's the key to being a scientist: YOU have to be your own worst critic because nature is never wrong. It is YOU who is almost always wrong. That's a fact that will become ever more obvious the longer you study a scientific subject. So, yeah, if that is emotionally hard on you, then science is not going to give you much joy, I am afraid. It's a life long learning process... and most of what you have to learn is actually the unlearning of your own worst ideas about "how things should be". Only then can you learn to see how things actually are.

    • @hitrapperandartistdababy
      @hitrapperandartistdababy 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@lepidoptera9337 “One couldn’t possible be further from the facts than you are” Implying my understanding was ‘dumber than average’ on a subject that is notorious for how difficult it can be to understand.
      that is indeed a completely unescessary addition to your wording solely written for the intention of showing some kind of superiority and or belittling.
      A simple “No, that is incorrect” followed by either an explanation or nothing at all would have sufficed plenty. I’m also sure you are quite aware of that fact. Based on your other responses one would imagine you are annoyed by the lack of knowledge on something you master.
      It’s also entirely possible that you aren’t aware of the fact in which case I’m here to tell you your wording comes off as incredibly arrogant and condescending.
      Has nothing to do with my “emotional level” (which is also pretty telling of how you view yourself as above others making a comment like that)
      its simply about basic common courtesy and respect.
      I came to this video seeking some knowledge on Quantum Physics because I find the subject very interesting, my knowledge is completely beginner and I welcome any information and correction. In fact I wrote my comment to ask for responses
      Just not when I find it to be belittling or patronizing in tone.
      If I where to teach you soccer and you made a poor kick should I also say
      “That kick was completely wrong, it could not have been further from proper form” Well it’s certainly the way certain teachers become
      “That teacher” No one liked.

    • @hitrapperandartistdababy
      @hitrapperandartistdababy 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@lepidoptera9337 Science isn’t about smacking people down for being wrong. Has nothing to do with the subject and everything to do with you.

  • @Gr8p_blast
    @Gr8p_blast 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Nah keep the animations. Its original

  • @charlesalready
    @charlesalready ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Do a video on why audio levels fluctuate drastically between videos.....

    • @Scienceabc
      @Scienceabc  ปีที่แล้ว +3

      It can happen when they are recorded in different environments with different acoustics.

  • @clinton6087
    @clinton6087 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Schrodinger was trying to demonstrate how ridiculous the science of quantum physics was.

    • @lepidoptera9337
      @lepidoptera9337 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Yes, and instead he demonstrated that he didn't understand it.

    • @CyberSecurity-cq8my
      @CyberSecurity-cq8my 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Thank you for complementing your comment, it made it better to understand your colleague's comment. ​@@lepidoptera9337

  • @Webedunn
    @Webedunn 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Quantum mechanics couldn’t be more different than classical physics. Classical physics is stuck on the wheel while the quantum world is unlimited.

    • @kalmanjulianne
      @kalmanjulianne 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Unlimited just like all the fake-money-printing worldwide.

  • @chetanrawatji
    @chetanrawatji 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    ❤❤

  • @davidrandell2224
    @davidrandell2224 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    QM classicalized in 2010. Forgotten Physics website uncovers the hidden variables and constants and the bad math of Wien, Schrodinger, Heisenberg, Einstein, Debroglie,Planck, Bohr etc. So,no.

  • @DuXQaK
    @DuXQaK 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Couldn't you think of an even more patronizing title

  • @madpilotmurdock
    @madpilotmurdock ปีที่แล้ว

    One day, I too will be, “a dead”

  • @thatomofolo452
    @thatomofolo452 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Fax 💯

  • @tripcanada
    @tripcanada 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Bro is confused about quantum physics and trying to confuse the entire youtube with him.

  • @guitarizard
    @guitarizard 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    If quantum mechanics wasn't logical, it would be useless. That's not what Schrodinger's cat was about. Stop misinforming people.

  • @kevinbeazy
    @kevinbeazy 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You’re incorrect about Shrodengers (spelling) cat. He came up with that thought experiment to show how absurd it is to state that the cat is both dead and alive. That’s not how the world works. A cat in a box is either alive or dead. Period. We don’t fully understand the math or the correct way to measure the quantum realm so we can’t describe everything about it.

    • @lepidoptera9337
      @lepidoptera9337 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes, we do understand both the math and the physics of this fully. It was Schroedinger who didn't. He wrote an article that was full of confusion and he ruined the subject with his explanation for generations of people who are being deceived by his false reasoning.

  • @angelasylvain2476
    @angelasylvain2476 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Why are the photons so angry?

  • @whothehe11
    @whothehe11 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Very respectful of you to give a nod to ISRO right towards the end. Well done.

  • @futurestoryteller
    @futurestoryteller ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Lol, so what you're saying is you attempt to teach complicated physical and mathematical concepts, but you don't understand the plot of Avenger's Endgame

  • @robnation2475
    @robnation2475 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ahhhh, now I get it! 😃
    (not really)🙄

  • @timothy8426
    @timothy8426 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Mass is occupied areas of space. Cold space is in mass. Mass is in constant maximum velocity momentum propelled through space. Cold resistance is transferring through mass, as mass momentum is in constant forward momentum in resistance. Magnetic fields are created by resistance to forward momentum causing mass to cycle in on itself. The greater the mass the greater resistance to forward momentum. Resistance in mass is in equalization as outward force contained in magnetic fields of forced cycling circulation patterns. Distance is reduced as mass expansion increases resistances to forward momentum. Momentum is constant velocity in entanglement and out of entanglement. Maximum momentum velocity of thermal energy singularity frequencies is a constant value. Frequency is vibrating from avoidance patterns of spiraling through cold resistance that is the fabric of space that is transferring through mass in transitioning areas of occupation time-line. Equalization is maintained in cycling circulation of outward pressure held in magnetic fields of forced flow. Frequencies spiraling rebounding in contained fields of force holding mass together in cycles of maximum momentum velocity of thermal energy singularity frequencies amassed in entanglement.

    • @HDMB0430
      @HDMB0430 ปีที่แล้ว

      Does not make any sense. Could you explain in simple english rather than make it so complicated for a layman to understand? The simpler you xan make the bigger expertise you have in the subject rather than going all technical mumbo jumbo.

    • @shaynathoon4009
      @shaynathoon4009 ปีที่แล้ว

      No jargon please! No long and hard scary-sounding words either! And no complex sentences! Just plain simple English!

  • @yittael-nachalah
    @yittael-nachalah ปีที่แล้ว

    🔥 🔥🔥 🔥🔥 🔥🔥 🔥

  • @APKZ04
    @APKZ04 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I still didnt understand nothing

  • @nishamkv7405
    @nishamkv7405 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Di anybody notice ISRO Logo

  • @Noob2ProRoblox
    @Noob2ProRoblox 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Quantum cool 😎
    👇if you agree

  • @kalismols606
    @kalismols606 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Wait till I tell my other self about this bs

  • @freemind279
    @freemind279 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    You should state that all you said is theory not knowledge!

  • @Liam-pz6my
    @Liam-pz6my หลายเดือนก่อน

    It would not even make the same difference

  • @shivaji856
    @shivaji856 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    These kinds of topics should not be introduced in schools and colleges as most of the students will fail in their academics.

  • @microman_mathtiiaasrosen
    @microman_mathtiiaasrosen ปีที่แล้ว

    go back 2 school,
    llearn about "position of state"
    mood is a factor

  • @freddynovember5842
    @freddynovember5842 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I dont understand why everyone always misrepesents the shroedingers cat thing. What about the world from the cats point of view? like it or not the cats point of view is there and it doens entangle with the subatomic realm just like us.

    • @lepidoptera9337
      @lepidoptera9337 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The cat doesn't matter. The point of Schroedinger's cat is to show that there is a non-trivial difference between reversible and irreversible systems. Quantum mechanics expresses that gap perfectly fine, Schroedinger was simply not happy that the gap exists in the first place and it ain't small. It's actually what creates reality.

  • @despecs
    @despecs 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    switched off at 0:21 with WRONG atom! good luck!

  • @sev9813
    @sev9813 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    الحمد لله إني وجدت قناتك من بين كل العرب

  • @rickhibdon11
    @rickhibdon11 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It saddens me that people will see all these silly movies, and talk like they understand the quantum universe.
    People see movies and cartoons, and think they are smart. I've been srudying quanrum physics for a few years now... and it still amazes me! We have no idea of how it works.... but we know it does.

    • @schmetterling4477
      @schmetterling4477 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What amazes you about an ensemble theory of energy? It's basically just Kolmogorov's axioms applied to microscopic energy flow.

  • @pelasgeuspelasgeus4634
    @pelasgeuspelasgeus4634 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Instead of explaining an unproven theory could you try to explain why it contains so many inconsistencies? Or don't you anything about Lorentz Transformations?

    • @lepidoptera9337
      @lepidoptera9337 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Quantum mechanics is not only perfectly consistent with relativity, much of its structure (if not all of it) is caused by relativity.

    • @pelasgeuspelasgeus4634
      @pelasgeuspelasgeus4634 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@lepidoptera9337 Both are Hollywood style theories and both are still unproven.

  • @ashishthakur5811
    @ashishthakur5811 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Read Vedas .. based on Science..

    • @lepidoptera9337
      @lepidoptera9337 4 วันที่ผ่านมา

      I bet you can't give me a single citation from the Vedas. ;-)

  • @mikiauto73
    @mikiauto73 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    It’s a very bad idea of explaining something (voice over) and at the same time what we are seeing is different, and even as different text. It’s ridiculous you guys don’t understand the brain can not capture information this way. Sorry, very bad video. It could have been goo doe since the voice over text is not bad.

    • @Scienceabc
      @Scienceabc  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks a lot for the feedback. This surely helps and we will keep this in mind for our next videos.

  • @joelp23
    @joelp23 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    i think the animations/visuals are a bit distracting from the information being read out

    • @Scienceabc
      @Scienceabc  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      thanks for your feedback

  • @eciesz
    @eciesz หลายเดือนก่อน

    So what you’re saying is quantum mechanics is make believe?

    • @lepidoptera9337
      @lepidoptera9337 4 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      He is saying that neither of you two are smart enough to understand it. ;-)

    • @eciesz
      @eciesz 4 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@lepidoptera9337 facts right there!

  • @KevinGrue
    @KevinGrue 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Cats aren’t in the fundamental world we are in physical world it doesn’t apply it’s just nothin…

  • @DougBe38
    @DougBe38 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    the animations are very distracting.

  • @shairsko9360
    @shairsko9360 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Still don’t understand tbh 🙈

    • @lepidoptera9337
      @lepidoptera9337 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Neither do these guys. They can't teach you what they don't understand themselves.

  • @renukasalve6555
    @renukasalve6555 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    jai maharashtra

  • @Guptaji_kaladka
    @Guptaji_kaladka 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hello

  • @stefanoslan
    @stefanoslan 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Dude the animation and sound is so distracting, I couldn't even finish the video, so annoying

  • @DisEnchantedPersons
    @DisEnchantedPersons 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It's easy, you don't really exist, you're a wave in spacetime. So wanna talk about God yet?

  • @lifenreviews
    @lifenreviews 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    this doesnt make sense

  • @Guptaji_kaladka
    @Guptaji_kaladka 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    1st

  • @KevinGrue
    @KevinGrue 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If a tree falls no one’s there does it make a sound??? Of course it does. It’s not not dead or alive in a superposition hahaha 🤣. It’s either dead or alive it’s not a superposition at all. This daft for physics ppl to say it’s equation equations can be solved this is just speculation. Look this cat is either dead or alive because we are physical beings god made is of course it’s alive or dead stop messing around I want real equations

  • @roserinaldi1623
    @roserinaldi1623 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    TOO MANY VOICES!

  • @daviddarcy-ewing6185
    @daviddarcy-ewing6185 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you for resisting the type of moronic music track that renders many scientific videos unwatchable.