Understanding Non-Self: Why Letting Go Leads to True Inner Peace
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 12 ธ.ค. 2024
- Understanding Non-Self: Why Letting Go Leads to True Inner Peace
This video explains the concept of Non-Self in Buddhism and why understanding that there is no fixed self can lead to inner peace. Through simple insights, you'll learn how letting go of attachment to the self can help you live a happier and more liberated life.
#nonself #buddhism #buddhismpodcast #buddhist
𝐂𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐧𝐞𝐥 𝐏𝐮𝐫𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐞 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐂𝐨𝐦𝐦𝐢𝐭𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭:
"At our channel, we are committed to sharing the beauty and wisdom of Buddhist teachings with the purpose of education and inspiration. All our content is created with deep respect for the Buddha’s teachings, aiming to promote understanding, mindfulness, and compassion in everyday life.
Our goal is to present the values and practices of Buddhism in a way that is accessible and beneficial to everyone, regardless of their background or beliefs. We do not seek to influence or alter anyone’s faith but simply to offer insights into the timeless wisdom of Buddhism as a source of guidance and positivity.
This channel is a space for learning, reflection, and connection, guided by the principles of respect, kindness, and truth. If you have any feedback or concerns, we welcome open and respectful dialogue. Thank you for supporting our mission to share the meaningful messages of Buddhism with the world."
I’m trying. 🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻. Thank you for sharing the video. May you attain inner peace!
You're doing great! 🙏🏻🙏🏻 Keep going, and thank you for your kind words
🙏
Yes, i and mine can be a problem, but “I Am”, not necessarily so.
The idea that “consciousness arises and ceases continuously” is a major difference between early Buddhist philosophy and Vedanta, which postulates a continuous, unborn and undying consciousness. Later buddhism introduced the notion of “ Buddha-Nature”, which corrected the error of a consciousness that only arises wit( the object and ceases with the ceasing of the object.
All phenomenon are without self might be better understood as not-self.
But consciousness itself doesn’t lead to affliction. Except that, of course, without consciousness the other aggregates woyuld not exist.
To say that thoughts and emotions are “not self” is not the same as saying there is no self. The Buddha never really said there is no self, only that all phenomenon are “not self”. He never really addressed the ontological question of the ultimate nature of self. In other words, the idea of anatta is a soteriological concept, not an ontological one. Many Buddhists are confuse about this and have adopted a “belief” that there is no self, and end up chasing the tiger by the tail into a chasm of nihilism. (Just sayin….)
🙏