How do you create questionnaires to determine the priority values for SWOT-ANP analyses? Do you rank each subfactor first to see which is most important or dominant (S3, S1, S2)? Or do you do a pairwise comparison for each subfactor (S1 vs S2, S1 vs S3)?
One of the clearest explanation of ANP. Appreciate this. Question on the example though, on the AHP comparing wrt technical skills to the 2 candidates, the result was 50-50. How come in ANP comparing wrt candidates to criterias we get 75% for candidate 1? once equally technical skilled became different with ANP?
The 75 % is calculated with regard to the candidate himself and not a comparison with the other candidate, like he has far more technical skills than sales and experience but he's still tied with candidate 2 in that area
Dear Sir, This is a great video to basically understand ANP. I'm studying this issue and not good at maths. I wonder how to calculate weighted, unweighted and limit supermatrix. Please tell me keywords and meaning of these supermatrices and how to calculate them (why do we need to make these matrices and calculation?) Thank you, Sir Geopel!
In theory no real limitations, but in practice stick to the number 7 plus or minus 2 as maximum. Otherwise, pair wise comparisons become troublesome and inconsistent
Im confused, u said in AHP the technical skill is equally 50 50,, but independently cand.1 is 75 and cand.2 is 13 on their technical skills? What is that even mean?
Yes, that's the difficulty in ANP, you consider both directions in the network. First you look at ALL candidates (alternatives) with respect to an INDIVIDUAL criterion (50/50 with respect to technical skills for both candidates). In the next step, you look at each INDIVIDUAL candidate (forget the other, just assume you onle have one), how convincing (prevalent) he is with respect to all criteria (75, 13, 13 for candidate 1 and 13, 75 13 for candidate 2). ANP requires very clear definitions all relations and can become quickly confusing. That's the reason, I don't use it.
Excellent video and explanation! Thanks Dr. Geopel.
Mrs. Karpak, thanks for feedback, you are welcome. See you in Malaysia?
amazing clarity... life saver
At 5:39 Candidate1{75,13,13} doesn't even add up to 100, shouldn't it be {84,8,8}?
thanks for ANP lecture reveals concepts and utilization process
How do you create questionnaires to determine the priority values for SWOT-ANP analyses? Do you rank each subfactor first to see which is most important or dominant (S3, S1, S2)? Or do you do a pairwise comparison for each subfactor (S1 vs S2, S1 vs S3)?
One of the clearest explanation of ANP. Appreciate this. Question on the example though, on the AHP comparing wrt technical skills to the 2 candidates, the result was 50-50. How come in ANP comparing wrt candidates to criterias we get 75% for candidate 1? once equally technical skilled became different with ANP?
Same question as me
The 75 % is calculated with regard to the candidate himself and not a comparison with the other candidate, like he has far more technical skills than sales and experience but he's still tied with candidate 2 in that area
Dear Sir,
This is a great video to basically understand ANP. I'm studying this issue and not good at maths. I wonder how to calculate weighted, unweighted and limit supermatrix. Please tell me keywords and meaning of these supermatrices and how to calculate them (why do we need to make these matrices and calculation?)
Thank you, Sir Geopel!
can u help me for anp
I thank u for your video, I love it
Can please any1 explain what is the criteria for deciding value of k??
thanks a lot Mr.
Sir, i just wonder where did you get the values in the matrix?
thank you, very helpful! :)
Sir, one question.
How much the maximum number of Criteria for ANP method.
Thanks for your help.
In theory no real limitations, but in practice stick to the number 7 plus or minus 2 as maximum. Otherwise, pair wise comparisons become troublesome and inconsistent
Thanks Dr. Geopel
Why in bocr, oportunity, cost, and risk are one direction on alternative? Only benefit have bidirection.
thank you very much!!!
Is it possible to explain conversion of weighted super matrix in to limit matrix?
It's a complex algorithm to do it numerical and difficult to explain. I remember a paper about it , I found in the internet. Cannot find it on my PC
Im confused, u said in AHP the technical skill is equally 50 50,, but independently cand.1 is 75 and cand.2 is 13 on their technical skills? What is that even mean?
Yes, that's the difficulty in ANP, you consider both directions in the network. First you look at ALL candidates (alternatives) with respect to an INDIVIDUAL criterion (50/50 with respect to technical skills for both candidates). In the next step, you look at each INDIVIDUAL candidate (forget the other, just assume you onle have one), how convincing (prevalent) he is with respect to all criteria (75, 13, 13 for candidate 1 and 13, 75 13 for candidate 2). ANP requires very clear definitions all relations and can become quickly confusing. That's the reason, I don't use it.
Can anyone tell how the limit matrix in the example is calculated? How to get the 36 and 64 percentage of alternatives? thanks.
Calculation of the limit matrix in AHP can be tricky. Use one of the free software packages, e.g superdecisions.
Can someone explain to me how to get from weighted super matrix to limit matrix?
bookmarked. thank you.
any software is there based on analytic network process
Super Decisions
is there an application to use this method?
Look for superdecisions:
superdecisions.com/downloads/index.php?section=win3_0_beta
bpmsg.com/ahp/
MUY BUENO! ¡PERO POR FAVOR EN ESPAÑOL!
5:00
pa wawan membawaku kesini
Wawan Dhewanto?
wonderful video, essay understanding base
Miller Larry Garcia Paul Allen Carol
Champlin Coves
Can you please share your email
Please contact me via the contact form on my website:
bpmsg.com/