Oh you mean sending a guy who mastermind with himself a crimes and later admitted it? It was the right move didn't defend Cohen, now she doesn't need to apologized.
@@ccollins108it’s not necessarily that. She says whatever to go where ever the money is. She is the biggest grifter in the media. As much as I disagree with some of what David Pakman says, I remember him talking about a radio deal offer he got that he declined bc they wanted him to grift to the far right over time. I watched Kelly’s podcast for two years and then realized that her contract with SeriusXM sounds like what David was talking about. I would have more respect for her if she was consistent throughout the years and not grift to NBC and then grift back even further than when she was at Fox for her podcast.
Just because she sees the misses and injustice in the cases and defends the indicted doesn't mean she's partisan just bc the person is Trump. She's a lawyer and she's showed she knows more than this host. How many guilty convictions were proven to be false in history? Too many to count. But of course, pro-dem party won't give this case the benefit of the doubt bc they're too emotional. So who's hyper partisan here? Making judgments as if you know the law
@@Simon-pl2zi She doesn't know NY law and she lied about the judge and the jury. She is a sad individual and people who believe her are even worse. Also, she directly says: "I do not know what he did" at 5:00
@@scottgarbs7761 fraud and trying to conceal a crime. 34 counts of Falsifying Business Records in the First Degree with an intent to cover up a crime Michael was send in prison for.
not an argument and not the point. Firstly, the judge fining Trump for making an opinion about the jury's political leaning, is absurd. And its a fair point, as statistically there would be a higher number of registered Democrats in the jury pool, which is Megyn's point.
@@Simon-pl2zi except both sides pick the jury and jurors are required to be impartial... just because someone is a Democrat or Republican doesn't mean the evidence to convict didn't exist...
Fake news, as usual with the media. What juror #2 actually said was that he was familiar with Donald Trump's truth social posts via Twitter. He did not follow Donald Trump on truth social, he in fact did not have a truth social account
So why wasn't Bill Clinton taken to court for doing the same thing whilst in office. Why wasn't Clinton charged over Monica Lewindki? It only matters when it's Trump.
No, you lose the expectation of privacy, but the idea that every politician is then obligated to pet the closet open to his skeletons is lala land. Every politician fights tooth and nail to keep things private - look no further than the 17mm paid out in one year by Congress to settle sexual allegations. None if that was made public
We go to the real issue: is giving hush money illegal? NO. As she said in 235 years, Donald is the first to be indicted on such a trivial, gray case. Are we naive to think that in those years, no other presidents have done the same? And yet a truly illegal act by Hilary Clinton of destroying 33k emails under subpoena is just brushed under the rug by pro democratic party
@bcconman1 You're 100% right. I couldn't help but notice her final comments, where she says: "...but you're not a hardcore partisan on the left like these folks are". Hmm... if she had any self awareness at all, she would consider removing the plank from her own eye, first, before accusing others of being 'hardcore partisans'. Truly bizarre!
I heard someone say: Trump said little ol "Megyn only likes Trump now to stay relevant". Not to mention, didn't he diss her while he was Commander in Chief, or; before he ran for office?
Never ever let a billionaire win! When will we ever learn?????
5 หลายเดือนก่อน
He’s not a billionaire. If he was, he would show his taxes. He would love to brag about it. Plus, if he was a billionaire, he’d be in Forbes Top 40 billionaires.
All people with TDS will hate Meghan now! She is a lawyer that talks to other lawyers. None of them thinks this was democracy in action. It’s activists and people that hate Trump that like this verdict. You guys will sellout the country because orange man bad. You guys are actually crazy
What fair trial are you harping about? Can't you see that it is election interference to go after your political opponents a time as such as this. Now the truth is here. Trump is still running and all this BS trials has made these democrat judges, attorneys, lawyers and prosecutors smeared shit all over their faces 😂😂😂
@@chuckpriselac7958 She didn't lie about Brad Smith's statements on the matter, so you're just calling the former FCC commissioner a liar without a shred of evidence.
I find it horrible that Ms. Megyn Kelly refers to the jurists as "horses" being led to water. They are not animals but real people whose lives have now been put at risk because others are blindly following the leader of their political party. This blind allegiance leads them to seek revenge just to appease their leader. What does that say about her as she tries to justify supporting a person who has been convicted of 34 felonies? In this unfortunate interview, Ms. MK has only demonstrated that she supports privilege and the unjust attack on innocent people when she and others do not like the outcome.
Hi kamealohasmith9006, Be careful. The appeal seems pretty viable in this one. Also, the jury people live in NY City. Not strong Trump country there wouldn't you say? What do you think those jurists thought could happen if they voted not guilty? Hmmm....never thought of that did ya? Please open your mind. Doing so will help everybody but mostly you. It worked for me. Thanks
@@scottgarbs7761 The crimes took place in New York so that is where the trial took place. Nothing wrong there. That jury worked very hard, listened and paid attention for seven whole weeks, missing their jobs, their pay, their families - and Trump disrespected them by sleeping. There was more than enough evidence to convict him on all counts. An appeal will not succeed, as the judge was very careful to be more than fair to Trump. The judge also did not commit any errors of law, which are the only basis for an appeal to succeed. So forget about it.
@@scottgarbs7761 Everyone is allowed to their opinion and what I wrote was a tempered response compared to what we are seeing on the right, especially among pundits like Ms. Kelley. Threatening, calling people nasty names, and questioning their intelligence is simply not ok. I continue to keep an open mind to all possibilities, but letʻs be honest; a jury got together under the most extreme circumstances and rendered a guilty verdict. The verdict and the rule of law should be respected.
@@davidanderson3684 Actually, it’s my understanding that Trump didn’t use campaign funds for this either. The payments came from the Trump Organization, and Trump made the checks out personally. I imagine that’s at least in part why there was no actual federal campaign finance charges brought forward by the feds. That would have been a clearer and more straightforward case.
@@denniskai2331 He does try often to play things down the middle. However he also often tries to press his look at morality on the country. He thought one way on this and Megan thought another. His opinion is just that, he does not have a sealed fact to say he is right. My own opinion based on trying to be objectionable is that he is mostly right. His bitching about the comments of the far right later is a little to much however.
@@BenReillySpydr1962 Watch it again. Then again if you have to. Then again there is no limit on how many times it will take. Let it permeate. It will eventually make sense to you.
She’s beholden to whatever the Trump talking points are. To think she really sees no moral issue with paying off a porn star makes her a bad person or a grifter. No inbetween.
@@debsmith7861 his classified documents case is in Florida and has a judge that Trump himself appointed... why not let that one through instead of delay, delay, delay?? His RICO case is in Georgia, not exactly a solid blue state... not to mention multiple associates already pleading guilty... Why would he basically admit to committing the crimes they accused him of by claiming he needs absolute immunity?? You don't need immunity if you're innocent... Try your best to get out of the cult...
Does anyone remembers; "She's got got blood coming out her eyes, and out of her everywhere?!" LIE: "Alvin Bragg did not campaign on getting Trump." Yes Megyn, when someone runs for public office, your life becomes an open book!
Uh, those thirty four convictions carry a penalty of as much as FOUR YEAR per charge. I am hoping, in the name of national unity, that the judge only sentences Donald on four counts but gives him the MAX on those charges. So Trump would only have to spend 12 years in PRISON rather than the 120 years he deserves.
I have noticed that Lefties, especially YT liberal/lefties don't know about the law really, but manage to spread lies about the other political party because of their tribalism. So far, I have heard nothing but actual legal facts from centrists and the Right. Must be, because the Left tribalists are so desperate to win against Trump, they think that this trial was so legit.
I like how she just makes up the law. He tells her what the law is and why he was there. "You're wrong, You're wrong". Then how did it go as far as it did?
lol she just makes up the law? She is a lawyer genius! Putting your tds aside, who knows more about the law? An actual lawyer citing case law and Supreme Court precedent in her argument or a partisan news anchor who starts every sentence with “I think” or “I feel” or “in my opinion”? Abrams only coherent argument to justify the situation is well we need to take the morality of the defendant into consideration and since I don’t like Trump its perfectly fine to break every semblance of partiality to piss all over and rewrite 200 yrs of established precedent. News flash that is the complete and total inversion of the actual law! It does not matter if satan himself is the defendant a jury is NOT allowed in any way shape or form to judge the defendant on any action at any point in his or her life that does not directly deal with the charges at hand and the judges job is to prevent any prejudicial information about said defendant not directly related to the charges from being said, inferred, or otherwise known from reaching the jurors while explicitly instructing the jury that any information or personal opinions of the defendant jurors may have CANNOT be considered in anyway. There is absolutely no case here whatsoever….NONE! The state has NO authority whatsoever to charge anyone with a federal campaign finance charge! ONLY THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT CAN BRING CHARGES AGAINST A DEFENDANT IN A FEDERAL ELECTION and that would be the job of the FCC which already looked at this case thoroughly years ago and explicitly said there is no crime here dropped their investigation! This judge knows 1000% that this conviction will be thrown out by a higher court on appeal. Only he doesn’t care because it’s not about the actual charges IT IS and has ALWAYS been about one thing and one thing only damage Trump as much as possible to influence and election! Period end of story and if you think otherwise you are clearly not following this case whatsoever!
@@Loislikes bro I don’t even like trump. That’s the problem. People who are just pointing out the absurdity and irony of this case being brought to trial by a judge who got into his position because his whole campaign was declared to take trump out one way or another and this case in particular is complete bullsht. Because I point that out you and a lot of other people call me a hardcore maga trump deranged etc etc etc. that’s amazing. I won’t judge you tho, honestly all this shts stupid. Jesus is the truth, all this other stuff is distractions. I wish you love and peace in your life my friend. Take care.
Wait a minute: Megyn Kelly said that paying someone to keep her/him quiet is not illegal? Did she also say that screwing a porn actress while your wife is at home looking after your child, is not immoral? Does she really find this scenario legal and moral? Wow.
She actually said she didn't know what their sex life entails or what agreements they have with each other. In other words, she isn't going to judge them based off of their sexual preferences. But the legal part. Yeah she said it's not illegal. Which is true. It's not illegal to have sex with somebody. It's also not illegal to pay somebody to not talk about that sex that you had.
Yes she did! The far right only has morals except when Trumpy is involved. Just like he never said "lock her up!"
5 หลายเดือนก่อน
Stormy chose to talk about the sex she had & the convicted rapist paid her not to do so. Nothing wrong w that. It was the financial transaction that got him. Rudy was the 1st of trump's attorneys to tell about how trump made the repayment of the 130k. He validated the State' claims before there were any State's claims. Watch the interview w Rudy and Hannity. 🍊🤡
@@Christobell119 But it IS illegal to falsify business records to effect the outcome of an election, which deceived the voters! hat's the crime and you know it! HE'S GUILTY!
Megan responding with "Incorrect" and "wrong" and "you don't know what you're talking about" while she clearly does not understand how campaign finance laws work speaks volumes about her and the people that think she "owned" Dan.
Only issue is Trump even denies ever having slept with this woman. So why pay someone not to go public if you never even engaged in the allegation of sex?
@@ardie72 12 of his fellow New Yorkers said guilty 34 times each to charges of falsifying business records. I know you will argue along with MK that these payments to Cohen for 'legal fees' were not illegal, but the jury rather quickly decided that both you and MK are wrong.
@@ProfessorSkottey no, unlike you I don't assume someone is a Trump supporter just because they don't agree with the DNC tactics.Trump won't even go on Megyn's podcast for an interview because of their ongoing differences of opinion.
Loving the maga cope after their daddy was found guilty. Was fucking crystal clear he were. Overwhelming evidence! Just ask yourself, why did trump and his lawyer lie about why trump didnt testify.
This was a senseless argument. We all agree that it should not have been brought to court. Bragg is the problem. It was not moral, but neither was what Clinton & JFK did.
Why is it immoral to pay your own money to keep someone from running their mouth about a private affair? Like Megyn said, it's essentially a NDA which is done all of the time.
@Hatrimn In my world, it is not immoral, but to the Bible, belt folks in Texas it is. A lot of Christians feel this way. I am voting for a man that I feel will make this country good again. I don't care about his personal matters.
In my small world affairs are immoral but that's between him and God if it happened. It's not up to me to judge him. I want the best man to run our country and right now that would be Donald Trump.
In December 2018, Trump’s former personal attorney, Michael Cohen, was sentenced to prison after pleading guilty to multiple charges, including campaign finance violations. Cohen testified that he arranged these payments at Trump’s direction, which he claimed were meant to influence the outcome of the 2016 election by suppressing potentially damaging stories. These payments were not reported as campaign expenses, which are considered illegal contributions to Trump’s campaign because they were made to influence the election outcome and exceeded legal limits. The key laws involved are: 1. Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA): This act governs the financing of federal elections, including limits on contributions and expenditures, and requires disclosure of campaign contributions and expenditures. 2. 18 U.S. Code § 1001 (false statements): Making false statements or failing to disclose required information about campaign contributions can violate this statute.
Specifically, Megan is correct. Which is why the judge refused to allow the head of the Federal Election Committee to testify that the payment was not a violation of the law.
In December 2018, Trump’s former personal attorney, Michael Cohen, was sentenced to prison after pleading guilty to multiple charges, including campaign finance violations. Cohen testified that he arranged these payments at Trump’s direction, which he claimed were meant to influence the outcome of the 2016 election by suppressing potentially damaging stories. These payments were not reported as campaign expenses, which are considered illegal contributions to Trump’s campaign because they were made to influence the election outcome and exceeded legal limits. The key laws involved are: 1. Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA): This act governs the financing of federal elections, including limits on contributions and expenditures, and requires disclosure of campaign contributions and expenditures. 2. 18 U.S. Code § 1001 (false statements): Making false statements or failing to disclose required information about campaign contributions can violate this statute.
Didn't trump go after Meghan kelly when she moderated a debate? He spent days rediculing her and just like every other republican, she's now kissing the ring.
Fully justifiable. Political alignment has nothing| to do with politics. Would love to know how they feel about the Documents case in Florida. Kelly knows sweet FA about how the justice system.
No one knows exactly what the split wold have been, you are both guessing. Statistically, the jury pool would have been weighted toward a higher number of registered Democrats who would be politically biased against Trump. The staging of the location was deliberate, as was the judge selection. As Kelly said, a fair trial would have been held in a jurisdiction that had a balanced political mix.
You can see all the liberals in the commentary giving their opinions and nothing else despite just being presented with a pretty strong defense as to why this was a partisan operation, which included some pretty outlandish actions by both the judge and prosecutor. Start to address those points and I might start giving liberals a modicum of respect. Your "opinions" have no weight to anyone but the echo chamber you surround yourselves with.
If the conservative magas in the commentary would stop looking at the entire Trump Crime Family shenanigans and ANYTHING Donald Trump through their highly partisan lense perhaps I might start giving conservatives a modicum of respect. Your "opinions" only have weight in spaces like this where it is nothing but echo chamber. See how the works sweetie.
Wow! All the comments from people who can't see the illegality of the act. No problem, they will all get to see it again when George Santos goes to trial for violating campaign finance laws.
Love how all these “tv lawyers” claim to have the answers regarding Trump crimes yet none of them would ever defend these theories in front of a real judge and jury. Nothing but clowns 🤡
@@Mypresident1986 no im saying first of all the purpose if a NDA is to protect sensitive business information to keep them competitive. Using one to hide a sexual encounter from wives and voters is dubious. Also trump would have to be deposed if he wanted to sue for a breech of contract and he will avoid that at all cost. That’s why he didn’t .
@@Mypresident1986 if i paid an attorney to draft an nda that would he a legal expense. The payment to the person im silencing would not be included in that .
@@mrloanagentman what is your point ? Are you saying Trump drafted the NDA himself not his lawyer? Because if his lawyer did anything to protect him boss and he is paid back, that is a legal expense. Unless you have a new term
@@Mypresident1986 the 130,000 was not a legal fee paid to the lawyer but was CLAIMED as a legal fee by Trump. Only the amount paid over and above that which was paid to his hooker can be claimed as a fee paid to the attorney. example: i buy a home for 1,000,000 and have my realtor arrange the transaction. Total cost 1,030,000 including fees to pay my realtor . The realtors fee is 30,000 not 1,030,000 . Sabes?
This guy is losing it because Megan is calmly ripping his arguments to shred so easily, it’s laughable.. The only thing this guy accomplished, was to insult Trump, and his guest.
Megyn Kelly is spot on, 100 percent correct. Dan first started on the wrong foot. If it was discussion on legal issue why bring moral issues on which no one in politics can stand.
I wonder if she will have a different standard for Clarence Thomas if Trumps issue reach the Supreme Court? It’s insulting when she and others get on a moral high horse as if they are a “straight shooter”. She has distain for Clinton but Trump she wipes her hands and she becomes a legal scholar for him
Is Megyn sick? She seems to have rapidly lost weight over the last couple months. Should we be concerned for her health or is this just an Ozempic thing?
@@JaysonSan-xp1zp been a while since I've seen her and she had drastic weight-loss in that time. I had a genuine concern for her health, but recently learned of the medicine being used by on-air personalities.
Kelly is on TH-cam for this reason. Her willingness to blindly disregard the legal issues the real ones ……. TH-cam she will remain. It’s a win win! Smh
Yep, you clearly watch FOX and didn't pay attention to the coverage of the trial. The DA presented witnesses and EVIDENCE that backed up their testimony that conclusively PROVED Trump committed the crimes he was charged with. The Trump defense was WEAK and Trump could not testify because he would have LIED on the stand, leading to charges of PERJUY. The jury in this case had no choice except to convict Trump because the EVIDENCE SCREAMED GUILTY. See, in the United States, that is how the justice system works. Trump should have faced Lady Justice long before now.
The judge did not make mistakes. If anything, he was way too nice to Trump, who attacked his daughter practically every day. The defense lawyer brought out the details of the forced sex, not the prosecution. It was the defense who made it possible to put Stormy on the stand because in their opening statement they called her a liar and claimed it never happened. So Megyn, whine all you like, you're wrong.
Dan c'mon.....next time you invite someone of Megyn Kelly's caliber to be on your show, do your research....maybe have Wheaties for breakfast lol IDK...u got served my friend...im embarrassed for you 😅
Megan Kelly says she has no distain for the jury. She just thinks they are as stupid as a thirsty horses and had no minds of their own. Thank God, she has no distain for the jury. And this was not a debate it was just a platform for Megan Kelly to speak her views.
Where was Megyn's outrage when Michael Cohen was sentenced to three years for basically the same thing?
Michael Cohen’s conviction was based on tax fraud and lying under oath. She doesn’t need to be outraged over that.
Not comparable. Cohen committed multiple felonies including tax evasion and bank fraud. Trump has not been convicted of committing a felony.
💯
Oh you mean sending a guy who mastermind with himself a crimes and later admitted it? It was the right move didn't defend Cohen, now she doesn't need to apologized.
Nowhere near the same thing. Lol.
NBC dumped Kelly for the good of the network.
Awwwww! 🤣🤣
Yeah, now is totally fake news that tells you what you want to hear rather than the truth. 🎉
While dumping her, they also had to pay her something like $26,000,000 dollars. She’s a very wealthy woman by my standards.
@@frederickrapp5396 chicken feed
LOL NBC is a joke. Just a third arm of the Democrat Party
Megyn Kelly complaining about everyone being hyper partisan…while being hyper partisan.
@johnhoban4435 Yeah, definitely no hint of self awareness, there. It's quite clear she will say whatever she has to, to defend the orange guy.
Just like Phil McGraw I'm so dumb when it comes to politics. All of them are a bunch of liars and 3rd rate hucksters. Now Trump's the mighty victim..
@@ccollins108it’s not necessarily that. She says whatever to go where ever the money is. She is the biggest grifter in the media. As much as I disagree with some of what David Pakman says, I remember him talking about a radio deal offer he got that he declined bc they wanted him to grift to the far right over time. I watched Kelly’s podcast for two years and then realized that her contract with SeriusXM sounds like what David was talking about. I would have more respect for her if she was consistent throughout the years and not grift to NBC and then grift back even further than when she was at Fox for her podcast.
The hypocrisy 😂
Just because she sees the misses and injustice in the cases and defends the indicted doesn't mean she's partisan just bc the person is Trump. She's a lawyer and she's showed she knows more than this host. How many guilty convictions were proven to be false in history? Too many to count. But of course, pro-dem party won't give this case the benefit of the doubt bc they're too emotional. So who's hyper partisan here? Making judgments as if you know the law
So Megyn was previously a lawyer and can't understand the crime? Wow! No wonder she went into tv
she articulated it quite clearly.
@@Simon-pl2zi She doesn't know NY law and she lied about the judge and the jury. She is a sad individual and people who believe her are even worse. Also, she directly says: "I do not know what he did" at 5:00
She’s MAGA
Hi anthonybruce3049, What was the crime then? Help her out. Thanks
@@scottgarbs7761 fraud and trying to conceal a crime.
34 counts of Falsifying Business Records in the First Degree with an intent to cover up a crime Michael was send in prison for.
7:44
Juror #2 said he got all his news from truth social. Is that a democrat? Probably not.
not an argument and not the point. Firstly, the judge fining Trump for making an opinion about the jury's political leaning, is absurd. And its a fair point, as statistically there would be a higher number of registered Democrats in the jury pool, which is Megyn's point.
@@Simon-pl2zi93% biden voters in Manhattan.
He did not. He said that's he's seen truth social posts via Trump's Twitter feed.
@@Simon-pl2zi except both sides pick the jury and jurors are required to be impartial... just because someone is a Democrat or Republican doesn't mean the evidence to convict didn't exist...
Fake news, as usual with the media. What juror #2 actually said was that he was familiar with Donald Trump's truth social posts via Twitter. He did not follow Donald Trump on truth social, he in fact did not have a truth social account
YES! When you run for office you DO LOSE THE RIGHT to privacy. That’s just how it is.
So why wasn't Bill Clinton taken to court for doing the same thing whilst in office. Why wasn't Clinton charged over Monica Lewindki? It only matters when it's Trump.
No, you lose the expectation of privacy, but the idea that every politician is then obligated to pet the closet open to his skeletons is lala land. Every politician fights tooth and nail to keep things private - look no further than the 17mm paid out in one year by Congress to settle sexual allegations. None if that was made public
We go to the real issue: is giving hush money illegal? NO. As she said in 235 years, Donald is the first to be indicted on such a trivial, gray case. Are we naive to think that in those years, no other presidents have done the same? And yet a truly illegal act by Hilary Clinton of destroying 33k emails under subpoena is just brushed under the rug by pro democratic party
The least egregious case of the four Trump faces, but the only one he couldn't squelch.
She seriously claimed Trump should have been allowed to talk about the jury?!?! Talk about a hack!
@bcconman1
You're 100% right. I couldn't help but notice her final comments, where she says: "...but you're not a hardcore partisan on the left like these folks are". Hmm... if she had any self awareness at all, she would consider removing the plank from her own eye, first, before accusing others of being 'hardcore partisans'. Truly bizarre!
Unbelievable!
Jury and witness intimidation (along with frivolous delays) are the only defenses Trump has for any of his indictments...
Hellooooo..
The defendant also has the right to pick the jury.
What judicial system are you people on?🤣🤣🤣
I heard someone say: Trump said little ol "Megyn only likes Trump now to stay relevant". Not to mention, didn't he diss her while he was Commander in Chief, or; before he ran for office?
Hold up maybe I'm wrong but didn't Martha Stewart do 4 months as a first time offender..🤔🤨😒
I think she may have done even more time.
@@dmann1115 I think u right🤔
I don't remember how long it was, but she sure was locked up without any prior convictions.
You realized she did commit a crime right? Trump used hush money which is not a crime. If so, all these celebs and athletes would be going to jail. 😂😂
@@newhouse6112 u do realize trump should face the same consequences right and didn't just use hush money he went against campaign finance laws.🤣🤣
Never ever let a billionaire win! When will we ever learn?????
He’s not a billionaire. If he was, he would show his taxes. He would love to brag about it. Plus, if he was a billionaire, he’d be in Forbes Top 40 billionaires.
What crime did he commit? I thought Abrams said this case shouldn’t be brought. Why the pivot?
business fraud in the 1st degree
He never said he didn't break the law.. Which he did
@@jorgecarrejo what law? Having someone sign an NDA? When can I sue my employer?
@@kevinkelley1205 34 felonies of Falsifying Business Records
@@jorgecarrejo hmm, yea still not sure Jorge, sounds like a stretch that you can’t even explain. Even Abrams said it’s a weird charge 🤷♂️
All Trumps crazies will love Meghan now!!
Anyone wanting whole truth, factual in-depth details, and ZERO omittance in reporting has loved Megyn for a very long while now.
All people with TDS will hate Meghan now! She is a lawyer that talks to other lawyers. None of them thinks this was democracy in action. It’s activists and people that hate Trump that like this verdict. You guys will sellout the country because orange man bad. You guys are actually crazy
She oozes Maga. It’s comical how much illogic she entertains to stay in the good graces of the Maga world. It’s an incessant need. Craven…just craven
Maybe you should concentrate on spelling her name correctly.
I've always loved Megyn.
He had a fair trial Kelly & you know it!!!!!
What fair trial are you harping about? Can't you see that it is election interference to go after your political opponents a time as such as this. Now the truth is here. Trump is still running and all this BS trials has made these democrat judges, attorneys, lawyers and prosecutors smeared shit all over their faces 😂😂😂
Mic drop, Megyn. Dan should have done a little more research.
Not quite, she makes lies up as she goes along!
Right!
@@chuckpriselac7958Was she lying about the supreme Court precedent? No. Dan was wrong.
@@chrishenkshe lied, Dan was right.
@@chuckpriselac7958 She didn't lie about Brad Smith's statements on the matter, so you're just calling the former FCC commissioner a liar without a shred of evidence.
I find it horrible that Ms. Megyn Kelly refers to the jurists as "horses" being led to water. They are not animals but real people whose lives have now been put at risk because others are blindly following the leader of their political party. This blind allegiance leads them to seek revenge just to appease their leader. What does that say about her as she tries to justify supporting a person who has been convicted of 34 felonies? In this unfortunate interview, Ms. MK has only demonstrated that she supports privilege and the unjust attack on innocent people when she and others do not like the outcome.
Hi kamealohasmith9006, Be careful. The appeal seems pretty viable in this one. Also, the jury people live in NY City. Not strong Trump country there wouldn't you say? What do you think those jurists thought could happen if they voted not guilty? Hmmm....never thought of that did ya? Please open your mind. Doing so will help everybody but mostly you. It worked for me. Thanks
The jury has remained anonymous. Unless jurors come out in the open and out themselves, no one will know.
@@scottgarbs7761 The crimes took place in New York so that is where the trial took place. Nothing wrong there. That jury worked very hard, listened and paid attention for seven whole weeks, missing their jobs, their pay, their families - and Trump disrespected them by sleeping. There was more than enough evidence to convict him on all counts. An appeal will not succeed, as the judge was very careful to be more than fair to Trump. The judge also did not commit any errors of law, which are the only basis for an appeal to succeed. So forget about it.
Hi@@dmann1115, I guess we will see. Thanks
@@scottgarbs7761 Everyone is allowed to their opinion and what I wrote was a tempered response compared to what we are seeing on the right, especially among pundits like Ms. Kelley. Threatening, calling people nasty names, and questioning their intelligence is simply not ok. I continue to keep an open mind to all possibilities, but letʻs be honest; a jury got together under the most extreme circumstances and rendered a guilty verdict. The verdict and the rule of law should be respected.
If that’s the case, why was Bill Clinton not arrested? He was in office at the time.
Because clint paid out of pocket, not camping funds, and try to cover up falsely hid documents, big difference!
@@davidanderson3684 Actually, it’s my understanding that Trump didn’t use campaign funds for this either. The payments came from the Trump Organization, and Trump made the checks out personally. I imagine that’s at least in part why there was no actual federal campaign finance charges brought forward by the feds. That would have been a clearer and more straightforward case.
@dsand1214 falseying business records is a felony and that's how the grand jury viewed the evidence without cohen help was enough to find him guilty!
@@davidanderson3684 wrong again lol! Google senetor john edwards
@@dsand1214if you read the evidence, there was indeed campaign funds used.
Abrams auditioning for MSNBC!
@@denniskai2331 Abrams is wrong about the law. Megyn Kelly is right.
MSDNC
@denniskai2331 no he's arguing from wrong. He is 100 percent wrong. Period. It's been adjudicated. It's over.
no he's just speaking too much common sense for your peabrain
@@denniskai2331 He does try often to play things down the middle. However he also often tries to press his look at morality on the country. He thought one way on this and Megan thought another. His opinion is just that, he does not have a sealed fact to say he is right. My own opinion based on trying to be objectionable is that he is mostly right. His bitching about the comments of the far right later is a little to much however.
Someone call SPU. Megan Kelly just violated this man.
She didn't violate anything.
@@catladie Sharp.
@@catladieshe violated herself, funny she doesn’t think cannon alito or Thomas should recuse themselves.
@@davidwalker2402 she said the opposite. She said the judge, should have recused himself .. 09:11 quote "he should have recused himself"
@@Simon-pl2ziwhich judge? She doesn’t think Canon Alito or Thomas should!
Megan destroyed him. She has her own show and isn't beholden to anybody and can speak the truth. Abrams got embarrassed.
Yeah, if you think sycophants spewing Trump love is speaking the truth.
.... How so?
@@BenReillySpydr1962 Watch it again. Then again if you have to. Then again there is no limit on how many times it will take. Let it permeate. It will eventually make sense to you.
She’s beholden to whatever the Trump talking points are. To think she really sees no moral issue with paying off a porn star makes her a bad person or a grifter. No inbetween.
I'm embarrassed for HIM😅😂😅😂
If he's so innocent, let the other trials proceed. What are they afraid of??
Obama judges? 12 registered Democrats in the jury in each case?
Tard question.
@@debsmith7861 his classified documents case is in Florida and has a judge that Trump himself appointed... why not let that one through instead of delay, delay, delay??
His RICO case is in Georgia, not exactly a solid blue state... not to mention multiple associates already pleading guilty...
Why would he basically admit to committing the crimes they accused him of by claiming he needs absolute immunity?? You don't need immunity if you're innocent...
Try your best to get out of the cult...
Lol, who said she's afraid? And now, one by one the cases agilainst Trump are falling apart
Abrahams is absolutely right
Lol
See, She’s clueless. Kelly doesn’t have a clue. She doesn’t know what she’s talking about.
She’s a partisan hack. Certainly not a journalist.
Does anyone remembers; "She's got got blood coming out her eyes, and out of her everywhere?!"
LIE: "Alvin Bragg did not campaign on getting Trump." Yes Megyn, when someone runs for public office, your life becomes an open book!
@user-zd6ue4lq3l w he at did she say that was wrong? Can you come up with anything or are you just clueless?
Clueless? what do you know about the laws in question? Please show some basis not just personal attacks on others.
Source: Trust me bro
How is Abrams, who is supposedly a lawyer, THIS ignorant about the law?
Project much?
Uh, those thirty four convictions carry a penalty of as much as FOUR YEAR per charge. I am hoping, in the name of national unity, that the judge only sentences Donald on four counts but gives him the MAX on those charges. So Trump would only have to spend 12 years in PRISON rather than the 120 years he deserves.
How is it that you are so ingoant that you buy into her bullshit and don't know the law yourself?
W was a fighter pilot, apparently...
I have noticed that Lefties, especially YT liberal/lefties don't know about the law really, but manage to spread lies about the other political party because of their tribalism. So far, I have heard nothing but actual legal facts from centrists and the Right. Must be, because the Left tribalists are so desperate to win against Trump, they think that this trial was so legit.
I like how she just makes up the law. He tells her what the law is and why he was there. "You're wrong, You're wrong". Then how did it go as far as it did?
lol she just makes up the law? She is a lawyer genius! Putting your tds aside, who knows more about the law? An actual lawyer citing case law and Supreme Court precedent in her argument or a partisan news anchor who starts every sentence with “I think” or “I feel” or “in my opinion”? Abrams only coherent argument to justify the situation is well we need to take the morality of the defendant into consideration and since I don’t like Trump its perfectly fine to break every semblance of partiality to piss all over and rewrite 200 yrs of established precedent. News flash that is the complete and total inversion of the actual law! It does not matter if satan himself is the defendant a jury is NOT allowed in any way shape or form to judge the defendant on any action at any point in his or her life that does not directly deal with the charges at hand and the judges job is to prevent any prejudicial information about said defendant not directly related to the charges from being said, inferred, or otherwise known from reaching the jurors while explicitly instructing the jury that any information or personal opinions of the defendant jurors may have CANNOT be considered in anyway. There is absolutely no case here whatsoever….NONE! The state has NO authority whatsoever to charge anyone with a federal campaign finance charge! ONLY THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT CAN BRING CHARGES AGAINST A DEFENDANT IN A FEDERAL ELECTION and that would be the job of the FCC which already looked at this case thoroughly years ago and explicitly said there is no crime here dropped their investigation! This judge knows 1000% that this conviction will be thrown out by a higher court on appeal. Only he doesn’t care because it’s not about the actual charges IT IS and has ALWAYS been about one thing and one thing only damage Trump as much as possible to influence and election! Period end of story and if you think otherwise you are clearly not following this case whatsoever!
Martha Stewart did 4 months as a first time offender.
If you're going to use facts and logic perhaps you don't belong in this website.
Cohen was sentenced to 3 years for the same crime 😂
Martha committed securities fraud, which is not even close to this case as she committed multiple felonies.
Stewart committed fraud and a string of other felonies, not the same thing.
Someone who knows what their talking about and knows the law. Finally. Thankyou.
Maybe Donald Trump should have had them as witnesses for the defense.. hahaha
@@johnmccarthy7195 Nah, the Judge wouldn't allow them. Because they don't hate Trump.
@@Loislikes well they should.
@@johnmccarthy7195 Yea cause no reason at all. LMAO. Its called Trump Derangement Syndrome bud.
@@Loislikes bro I don’t even like trump. That’s the problem. People who are just pointing out the absurdity and irony of this case being brought to trial by a judge who got into his position because his whole campaign was declared to take trump out one way or another and this case in particular is complete bullsht. Because I point that out you and a lot of other people call me a hardcore maga trump deranged etc etc etc. that’s amazing. I won’t judge you tho, honestly all this shts stupid. Jesus is the truth, all this other stuff is distractions. I wish you love and peace in your life my friend. Take care.
Dan Abrahams did a good job of pushing back. Sometime facts matter
Well he can join the millions of other men that have been convicted unfairly. Stop whining!
You're the one who's whining. You just want people to shut up when they are syaing things that don't agree with your uninformed opinions
Okay! You have a great birthday, just in case it hasn’t passed🎉
Wait a minute: Megyn Kelly said that paying someone to keep her/him quiet is not illegal? Did she also say that screwing a porn actress while your wife is at home looking after your child, is not immoral?
Does she really find this scenario legal and moral?
Wow.
She actually said she didn't know what their sex life entails or what agreements they have with each other.
In other words, she isn't going to judge them based off of their sexual preferences.
But the legal part. Yeah she said it's not illegal. Which is true.
It's not illegal to have sex with somebody. It's also not illegal to pay somebody to not talk about that sex that you had.
Yes she did! The far right only has morals except when Trumpy is involved. Just like he never said "lock her up!"
Stormy chose to talk about the sex she had & the convicted rapist paid her not to do so. Nothing wrong w that. It was the financial transaction that got him. Rudy was the 1st of trump's attorneys to tell about how trump made the repayment of the 130k. He validated the State' claims before there were any State's claims. Watch the interview w Rudy and Hannity. 🍊🤡
I'm wondering if this is your first time watching her?
Don't you know that she's always hypocrit?
@@Christobell119 But it IS illegal to falsify business records to effect the outcome of an election, which deceived the voters! hat's the crime and you know it! HE'S GUILTY!
What an absolute joke this woman is this is beggers belief
If you dont want to be convicted of crimes and become a felon... don't break the law. The rest of us seem to be able to do it.
he didn't. political bull s..i
@@joycedoyle8251do you have proof that the evidence didn’t exist? He’s clearly a felon and they used solid evidence to convict.
@@dipeshvaria2372 he committed 34 of them. Look them up, troll.
@@SuperPlasteredlegal experts would say otherwise
@@roxyfoxyyy7 what you just did is what’s called a lie. Legal experts just tried and convicted a felon.
Megan responding with "Incorrect" and "wrong" and "you don't know what you're talking about" while she clearly does not understand how campaign finance laws work speaks volumes about her and the people that think she "owned" Dan.
Only issue is Trump even denies ever having slept with this woman. So why pay someone not to go public if you never even engaged in the allegation of sex?
Trump lies
Megyn Kelly's lips are so orange
Just wait till Trump gets a hold of these NY judges prosecutors!
He can't even get ahold of himself. Nobody is worried about Trump anymore, he's a paper tiger. He has no power whatsoever.
And How is he going to Do That! Trump would have to be A DICTATOR!! Oh Forgot, Trump’s Plans to be a DICTATOR on DAY1!😱😱😱
OOOOOOOHHHHHHHH BOY
What will he do?
@@chuckpriselac7958 Its to shocking to reveal...
She’s so morally lost in a maze of confusion.
"I don't know what he did." This pretty much sums up MK's approach to most topics...
do you know?
@@ardie72 I ain't joining a podcast (but yeah, given DT's track record, I think we all have a pretty good idea...)
@@michaelmccollister7482
cool, so what did he do that was illegal?
@@ardie72 12 of his fellow New Yorkers said guilty 34 times each to charges of falsifying business records. I know you will argue along with MK that these payments to Cohen for 'legal fees' were not illegal, but the jury rather quickly decided that both you and MK are wrong.
@@michaelmccollister7482 what did he specifically do that was illegal?
Megan is shameless. I just can't watch her lies.
MAGA Megyn
This might be the most humiliating moment in Megyn Kelly's life, with this utterly pathetic and shameless shilling, and delusional coping.
Trump really brought her to heel 😂
except Megyn isn't a Trump supporter.
@@Simon-pl2zi Do you live in the Twilight zone?
@@ProfessorSkottey no, unlike you I don't assume someone is a Trump supporter just because they don't agree with the DNC tactics.Trump won't even go on Megyn's podcast for an interview because of their ongoing differences of opinion.
@@Simon-pl2zi DNC tactics!? Please explain!
TRUMP PRISON 2024.
What a rigged trial
Awww 😂
Rigged by Trump! He picked the jury and his witnesses and CHOSE not to testify himself! Stop whining! 😂
Everything is rigged with Trump 😂😂😂
Loving the maga cope after their daddy was found guilty. Was fucking crystal clear he were. Overwhelming evidence!
Just ask yourself, why did trump and his lawyer lie about why trump didnt testify.
We know. Everything is rigged with trump.
This was a senseless argument. We all agree that it should not have been brought to court. Bragg is the problem. It was not moral, but neither was what Clinton & JFK did.
Why is it immoral to pay your own money to keep someone from running their mouth about a private affair? Like Megyn said, it's essentially a NDA which is done all of the time.
@Hatrimn In my world, it is not immoral, but to the Bible, belt folks in Texas it is. A lot of Christians feel this way. I am voting for a man that I feel will make this country good again. I don't care about his personal matters.
JAIL Trump!!
In my small world affairs are immoral but that's between him and God if it happened. It's not up to me to judge him. I want the best man to run our country and right now that would be Donald Trump.
Speak for yourself
This woman is a liar,I even feel sorry for the husband
Megyn is a rock star. She knows her stuff and can convey the facts. Love her!
More alternative facts
Misdemeanor ..past statute of limitations
Convicted Felon.
Trump is guilty as sin
@@martinq1920your mother wears combat boots. Get you to a burn unit
These libs will snap in a few months, it will be a landslide. This will be great. Trump 2024. 🎉
Not true.
Does Dan Abrams have a law degree? Megyn Kelly is a former prosecutor...she knew her stuff, he didn't.
The query regarding Dan Abrams reflects the depth of your knowledge.
He does have a law degree
In December 2018, Trump’s former personal attorney, Michael Cohen, was sentenced to prison after pleading guilty to multiple charges, including campaign finance violations. Cohen testified that he arranged these payments at Trump’s direction, which he claimed were meant to influence the outcome of the 2016 election by suppressing potentially damaging stories. These payments were not reported as campaign expenses, which are considered illegal contributions to Trump’s campaign because they were made to influence the election outcome and exceeded legal limits.
The key laws involved are:
1. Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA): This act governs the financing of federal elections, including limits on contributions and expenditures, and requires disclosure of campaign contributions and expenditures.
2. 18 U.S. Code § 1001 (false statements): Making false statements or failing to disclose required information about campaign contributions can violate this statute.
I don't think she was a prosecutor. She worked for a law firm.
Yes Dan Abrams has a law degree and passed the bar from Columbia University.
🤠 Texans for Trump 🤠
Floridians for Biden!!
@@SuperPlastered LOL
Speak for yourself
@@SuperPlasteredflorida is going over 65% to trump. Lol. Biden is hated here.
Poor Megyn. It looks like her anorexia/bulimia eating disorder is out of control. Please, Megyn, remember Karen Carpenter.
Bill Maher destroyed her the other day, now she continues her advocacy for Granpa Trump. Sad!
He’s a convicted felon Megan. Get over it!
Agree with a few points from Dan but generally think megan is correct
Specifically, Megan is correct. Which is why the judge refused to allow the head of the Federal Election Committee to testify that the payment was not a violation of the law.
45 is guilty as hell
She’s so mad 😂😂
Because Dan is speaking nonsense.
Megyn Kelly looks sick.
Hahaha
Seriously ?
Megyn destroyed him with legal facts.
💯
In December 2018, Trump’s former personal attorney, Michael Cohen, was sentenced to prison after pleading guilty to multiple charges, including campaign finance violations. Cohen testified that he arranged these payments at Trump’s direction, which he claimed were meant to influence the outcome of the 2016 election by suppressing potentially damaging stories. These payments were not reported as campaign expenses, which are considered illegal contributions to Trump’s campaign because they were made to influence the election outcome and exceeded legal limits.
The key laws involved are:
1. Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA): This act governs the financing of federal elections, including limits on contributions and expenditures, and requires disclosure of campaign contributions and expenditures.
2. 18 U.S. Code § 1001 (false statements): Making false statements or failing to disclose required information about campaign contributions can violate this statute.
She always has to bring up the Clintons in some way 😁😆
😂😂😂😂😂😂 ok mate
Didn't trump go after Meghan kelly when she moderated a debate? He spent days rediculing her and just like every other republican, she's now kissing the ring.
Wow. Megan slickly misrepresented the law and this case. If what she says was true, it would have been the backbone of the defenses case.
Fully justifiable. Political alignment has nothing| to do with politics. Would love to know how they feel about the Documents case in Florida. Kelly knows sweet FA about how the justice system.
The Jurors were not ALL Democrats Megan. Juror #2 stated that he got all his news from Truth Social. Get YOUR facts correct
Exactly
No one knows exactly what the split wold have been, you are both guessing. Statistically, the jury pool would have been weighted toward a higher number of registered Democrats who would be politically biased against Trump. The staging of the location was deliberate, as was the judge selection. As Kelly said, a fair trial would have been held in a jurisdiction that had a balanced political mix.
What he actually said, was he got Trump’s TruthSocial posts from X, not directly from TruthSocial. Get your facts correct!
93% voted for biden in Manhattan. Total sham trial anyway.
No he didn't. He stated that he saw the Truth Social posts via Trump's Twitter. "Get YOUR facts correct"
You can see all the liberals in the commentary giving their opinions and nothing else despite just being presented with a pretty strong defense as to why this was a partisan operation, which included some pretty outlandish actions by both the judge and prosecutor. Start to address those points and I might start giving liberals a modicum of respect. Your "opinions" have no weight to anyone but the echo chamber you surround yourselves with.
If the conservative magas in the commentary would stop looking at the entire Trump Crime Family shenanigans and ANYTHING Donald Trump through their highly partisan lense perhaps I might start giving conservatives a modicum of respect. Your "opinions" only have weight in spaces like this where it is nothing but echo chamber. See how the works sweetie.
So Kelly thinks it's ok to falsify business records?
Obviously. She also doesn't have a problem with him being a registered sex predator.
The case has nothing to do with falsifying business records.
Wow! All the comments from people who can't see the illegality of the act. No problem, they will all get to see it again when George Santos goes to trial for violating campaign finance laws.
In a courtroom it's illegal that matters.
Megyn Kelly OWNED Dan Abrams. LMFAO. Abrams brought a pillow (not even a knife) to a gun fight..!
Kelly just got slaughtered..you are delusional.
Whe didn’t see the same debate or just another cultist . I am more inclined for the second
Stick with whether or not Santa Claus is white, Megyn.
😂
This guy did not bring receipts. But Megyn did. Dan is INTELLECTUALLY OUTCLASSED.....
I don’t know what show you were watching but you’re on another planet
Disingenuous conversation by Kelley. No morals.
abrams has the worst show on that channel.....
Love how all these “tv lawyers” claim to have the answers regarding Trump crimes yet none of them would ever defend these theories in front of a real judge and jury. Nothing but clowns 🤡
what Megyn is talking about are not theories, she speaking to the actual law of NYC
She's trying to normalize criminality. I wonder why his attorney didn't make those goofy arguments. Guilty! Guilty! Guilty.
An NDA is NOT a legal expense. Period.
None Disclosure Agreement is not legal ?
Are you saying if one agrees to NDA and goes ahead and breaks the NDA can he or she be sued ?
@@Mypresident1986 no im saying first of all the purpose if a NDA is to protect sensitive business information to keep them competitive. Using one to hide a sexual encounter from wives and voters is dubious. Also trump would have to be deposed if he wanted to sue for a breech of contract and he will avoid that at all cost. That’s why he didn’t .
@@Mypresident1986 if i paid an attorney to draft an nda that would he a legal expense. The payment to the person im silencing would not be included in that .
@@mrloanagentman what is your point ?
Are you saying Trump drafted the NDA himself not his lawyer?
Because if his lawyer did anything to protect him boss and he is paid back, that is a legal expense.
Unless you have a new term
@@Mypresident1986 the 130,000 was not a legal fee paid to the lawyer but was CLAIMED as a legal fee by Trump. Only the amount paid over and above that which was paid to his hooker can be claimed as a fee paid to the attorney. example: i buy a home for 1,000,000 and have my realtor arrange the transaction. Total cost 1,030,000 including fees to pay my realtor . The realtors fee is 30,000 not 1,030,000 . Sabes?
This guy is losing it because Megan is calmly ripping his arguments to shred so easily, it’s laughable.. The only thing this guy accomplished, was to insult Trump, and his guest.
MK is crazy. Straight up crazy.
Totally agree
She is delusional !
Ozempic + buccal fat removal.
Megyn Kelly is spot on, 100 percent correct. Dan first started on the wrong foot. If it was discussion on legal issue why bring moral issues on which no one in politics can stand.
Donald Trump 2024
I wonder if she will have a different standard for Clarence Thomas if Trumps issue reach the Supreme Court? It’s insulting when she and others get on a moral high horse as if they are a “straight shooter”. She has distain for Clinton but Trump she wipes her hands and she becomes a legal scholar for him
Love Megyn! Brilliant, passionate, and a hero for our times! ❤🔥🏆
Dan Abrams doesn’t represent the voice of reason.
Megan Kelly has gone bonkers! Also, consume some protein.
Grow up.
@@machtnichtsseimann Does she still have 'Blood Coming Out of Her Wherever' ?
@@martinq1920 Farting 1920
@@machtnichtsseimann Grew up at the age of 19 in the military, now 81. I continue to grow. Thx.
Megyn Kelly, you absolutely nailed clueless Dan Abrams
wow that was hard to watch he got destroyed so hard
Megyn Kelly just blew him away.
Abrams got spent by a woman
Bravo Megyn! Clear as water.
Is Megyn sick? She seems to have rapidly lost weight over the last couple months. Should we be concerned for her health or is this just an Ozempic thing?
Ozempic diet for sure. Get face will go gaunt in the next few months too
Seriously? That's what you retained from this? Smh...wow.
@@JaysonSan-xp1zp been a while since I've seen her and she had drastic weight-loss in that time. I had a genuine concern for her health, but recently learned of the medicine being used by on-air personalities.
Kelly is on TH-cam for this reason.
Her willingness to blindly disregard the legal issues the real ones ……. TH-cam she will remain.
It’s a win win! Smh
Megyn crushed it!
She crushed the truth and expounded the lies.
SHE IS Licking her LIPS !
I would like to ask Megyn one question: Should Aileen Cannon recuse herself? I’m willing to bet a whole lotta hypocrisy in her answer.
Trump's guilty verdict by the jury from Sodom & Gomorrah is a badge of honor. ❤️🙏
Yep, you clearly watch FOX and didn't pay attention to the coverage of the trial. The DA presented witnesses and EVIDENCE that backed up their testimony that conclusively PROVED Trump committed the crimes he was charged with. The Trump defense was WEAK and Trump could not testify because he would have LIED on the stand, leading to charges of PERJUY. The jury in this case had no choice except to convict Trump because the EVIDENCE SCREAMED GUILTY. See, in the United States, that is how the justice system works. Trump should have faced Lady Justice long before now.
Yeah, that's why he's scared shitless about it! 😂
@@MPR2 Merchan may have to declare a mistrial because a juror released the verdict via Facebook to a relative before it was recorded by the judge. 🎪🤡🎪
@@LoireValleyChateaux Really?
@@MPR2 Google it... Legacy Media headlines: "Trump escapes Democracy" 🎪🤡🎪
Now I'm glad that MSNBC fired you, in fact, I'm gloating now,megs.
Kelly is a big fan of Ozempic
The judge did not make mistakes. If anything, he was way too nice to Trump, who attacked his daughter practically every day. The defense lawyer brought out the details of the forced sex, not the prosecution. It was the defense who made it possible to put Stormy on the stand because in their opening statement they called her a liar and claimed it never happened. So Megyn, whine all you like, you're wrong.
I'm a very innocent man,.... So, what are those checks all about, donnie boy?!
Is it OK that Bill Clinton did it but he did it out in the open is that why it’s OK and not OK if Trump did it?
Tough luck 😂
Dan c'mon.....next time you invite someone of Megyn Kelly's caliber to be on your show, do your research....maybe have Wheaties for breakfast lol IDK...u got served my friend...im embarrassed for you 😅
Megan Kelly says she has no distain for the jury. She just thinks they are as stupid as a thirsty horses and had no minds of their own. Thank God, she has no distain for the jury. And this was not a debate it was just a platform for Megan Kelly to speak her views.