Hopefully, the poor boat has had enough sitting in a marina doing nothing. So has its owner hahaha. But the weather here is pretty angry, and I feel I have slightly better marine risk analysis skills than that other Rush guy that got squeezed out like toothpaste putting a boat where it shouldn’t be hahaha
PM me on discord those cases hahaha. I’ll probably start with the old rig, standard atx mobo i9-9900k. But a case that can fit a 6800/6900XT there seem to be a bunch of those GPUs around cheap second hand on marketplace, but they seem to be longer than the Nvidia GPUs. Unless you recon a ITX+Ryzen system will work, cause the only problem with the i9 is just how much power it uses o/clocked. Like 190 watts, atleast the Ryzen are lower. It’s just then I’m trying to build a whole new rig, ram, mobo etc, gets expensive real quick. But I think the i9 will be fine, I was running it stable at 4.9, so I could sacrifice some performance, undervolt and accept 4.7-4.8. But I just don’t know if that clockspeed is enough for MSFS these days when mid tier Ryzen are 5.4’s
@@AeroSimGaming yeah ill do that the 3D cache Ryzen stuff is a MONSTER in flights sims too and price is right. i just helped Jack with setup for his RV too that ITX build
I just had a thought. If you need help anytime just give us a shout. If I am not working I am pretty much not doing much these days. Also Cameras there are these cool little web cams now that rotate 360deg and are pretty tiny might work for you.
I actually was reading up about a plug-in for OBS for those rotate cams, it would allow moderators in twitch to actually fully control the camera. Make it pan and move. So if I do my classic ‘leave the camera’ technique, someone can type a command and tilt the camera to follow
I actually was reading up about a plug-in for OBS for those rotate cams, it would allow moderators in twitch to actually fully control the camera. Make it pan and move. So if I do my classic ‘leave the camera’ technique, someone can type a command and tilt the camera to follow me around
Wow. Disregarding all the other issues: This dependence on electrical fuel pumps goes against what I was taught about aircraft engine design. Is it a general carbureted turbo engine or specific Rotax 914 thing? The naturally aspirated 912 should be completely independent to external electricity afaik.
Little hot on the trigger there, since you basically explained the intended wiring and redundancy shortly after... Still, coming from the 912 I guess any additional point of failure just feels uneasy.
so thinking how id wire the AC side id have Main reg back-up reg switch over by relay so the switch on the panel closes a relay and thats all power off your battery. but yeah wires are all FAR to narrow gauge wire and all the crap junctions putlling million amps everywhere. and you got all that going though again the main bus switch which again should be a relay with relay big enough to handle like 30 amps or so. but yeah proper relays on the switches and thicker wire on everything. its amazing this aircraft isnt in a crater or burned to ground yet...
I haven’t thought of that, I kinda like it as an idea to explore. I’m not convinced I even want the second regulator to be re-installed to be honest. But a relay that switches between the regulators is a good idea. The only risk I see, is it adds a single point of failure between the 2 redundant systems. A really robust relay would work. I think a middle ground would be retaining the backup regulator, but have it physically disconnected. Basically just carry the other regulator as a spare. Anything goes wrong and the aircraft is a long way from home, lane plug in the backup, keep going. But even that feels a little ‘back yard’. Because you could just carry a spare rotax regulator and swap it out.
@@AeroSimGaming give you an idea how AWFUL the wire is ... i would use wire that thin for a 12v model railroad bus bar. and on my RC helis i run stuff thats like 3x thicker with braided core for battery to ESC. if there no issues running the regs in parallel then yeah no need for a switch over. on RC stuff its bad to do because if one fails it can take out the other so you want isolate them if you can. i should link you some redundant stuff that gets used for 30%+ scale stuff for power. but yeah in RC is bit more dire you keep power to RX and servos ... at lest in this case you can land with out DC power
how... how is this aircraft not a pile of ash by now! you just saved this owners life
I cant believe they wired it up this way... Zappy Zappy boom boom :D
Wishing you the best mate and hopefully some happy sails soon! 🙏
*scoobypood
Hopefully, the poor boat has had enough sitting in a marina doing nothing. So has its owner hahaha. But the weather here is pretty angry, and I feel I have slightly better marine risk analysis skills than that other Rush guy that got squeezed out like toothpaste putting a boat where it shouldn’t be hahaha
@@AeroSimGaming 😅😅
Re: streaming setup there some REALLY great ITX cases now that fit full size GPU!
PM me on discord those cases hahaha. I’ll probably start with the old rig, standard atx mobo i9-9900k. But a case that can fit a 6800/6900XT there seem to be a bunch of those GPUs around cheap second hand on marketplace, but they seem to be longer than the Nvidia GPUs. Unless you recon a ITX+Ryzen system will work, cause the only problem with the i9 is just how much power it uses o/clocked. Like 190 watts, atleast the Ryzen are lower. It’s just then I’m trying to build a whole new rig, ram, mobo etc, gets expensive real quick. But I think the i9 will be fine, I was running it stable at 4.9, so I could sacrifice some performance, undervolt and accept 4.7-4.8. But I just don’t know if that clockspeed is enough for MSFS these days when mid tier Ryzen are 5.4’s
@@AeroSimGaming yeah ill do that the 3D cache Ryzen stuff is a MONSTER in flights sims too and price is right. i just helped Jack with setup for his RV too that ITX build
I just had a thought. If you need help anytime just give us a shout. If I am not working I am pretty much not doing much these days. Also Cameras there are these cool little web cams now that rotate 360deg and are pretty tiny might work for you.
I actually was reading up about a plug-in for OBS for those rotate cams, it would allow moderators in twitch to actually fully control the camera. Make it pan and move. So if I do my classic ‘leave the camera’ technique, someone can type a command and tilt the camera to follow
I actually was reading up about a plug-in for OBS for those rotate cams, it would allow moderators in twitch to actually fully control the camera. Make it pan and move. So if I do my classic ‘leave the camera’ technique, someone can type a command and tilt the camera to follow me around
I’ll text ya, I’m going to do another day (Thursday) then have a few days off. So if you want to drop down to Serpentine Sunday/Monday?
@@AeroSimGaming I'll need to check my roster I am think I am working those days
Wow. Disregarding all the other issues: This dependence on electrical fuel pumps goes against what I was taught about aircraft engine design. Is it a general carbureted turbo engine or specific Rotax 914 thing? The naturally aspirated 912 should be completely independent to external electricity afaik.
Little hot on the trigger there, since you basically explained the intended wiring and redundancy shortly after... Still, coming from the 912 I guess any additional point of failure just feels uneasy.
so thinking how id wire the AC side id have Main reg back-up reg switch over by relay so the switch on the panel closes a relay and thats all power off your battery. but yeah wires are all FAR to narrow gauge wire and all the crap junctions putlling million amps everywhere. and you got all that going though again the main bus switch which again should be a relay with relay big enough to handle like 30 amps or so. but yeah proper relays on the switches and thicker wire on everything. its amazing this aircraft isnt in a crater or burned to ground yet...
I haven’t thought of that, I kinda like it as an idea to explore. I’m not convinced I even want the second regulator to be re-installed to be honest. But a relay that switches between the regulators is a good idea. The only risk I see, is it adds a single point of failure between the 2 redundant systems. A really robust relay would work. I think a middle ground would be retaining the backup regulator, but have it physically disconnected. Basically just carry the other regulator as a spare. Anything goes wrong and the aircraft is a long way from home, lane plug in the backup, keep going. But even that feels a little ‘back yard’. Because you could just carry a spare rotax regulator and swap it out.
@@AeroSimGaming give you an idea how AWFUL the wire is ... i would use wire that thin for a 12v model railroad bus bar. and on my RC helis i run stuff thats like 3x thicker with braided core for battery to ESC.
if there no issues running the regs in parallel then yeah no need for a switch over. on RC stuff its bad to do because if one fails it can take out the other so you want isolate them if you can. i should link you some redundant stuff that gets used for 30%+ scale stuff for power. but yeah in RC is bit more dire you keep power to RX and servos ... at lest in this case you can land with out DC power