BEEN WAITING FOR THIS FOR YEARS NOW. WAY BETTER THEN EV OR WATER CARS, imagine everyone had an ev car. There would be hour a 2 hour long line up at the charging stations. They cost just as much as gas to fill. now imagine water fueled cars. Now our drinking water will go up in price like gas did when it was first introduced at .05 cents per gallon which went up 1067% if we used water and it went up 1067% we would see 46.00 dollars a gallon
Regenerative braking, an alternator type battery, and or friction heat powered uv panel design etc, should be able to restore the compressed air without charging station stops. A removable, chargeable electric air pump is additional option. Furthermore, if an oxygen air cannister is explosion risk, should be possible to modify compressed air tank with 50lbs battery to safely run a regular combustion engine any way. With no liquid fuel emissions tho
You have to get the energy from an energy source. Solar panel can only produce 250-300 w per square meter. You need much more than you can fit on the roof of a car.
@@beehappy7797 No, because heat from tire friction can light up LED lights, which can feed panel in car design. Modifying panel to use infrared spectrum can use friction heat directly, too. Friction heat source is hydraulics/ braking. It's about energy recovery, and the inertia physics is the energy source in such designs. Alternator is classic example of energy recovery already.
These people just jump from one thing to another without actually seeing anything, firstly EVs are currently powering essential innovation and secondly having one dominant solution applied world wide is extremely unhealth...
I bought a high pressure pump to fill up a tank for paintball and possibly HPA air gun in the future a few months back. HPA air guns have come a long way and have so much power even rivaling guns that use gunpowder these days. Anyways, I thought if they ever used compressed air to power machines since it is a legitimate power source. I didn't look it up at that time and just came across this now. As stated in the video, someone already thought of it a long time ago. There's a term called "frequency illusion" in psychology, not sure if that's what it is but every time I come up with an idea or think of a thought experiment, I hear a topic about it in the news or see videos about it later on. This has happened a lot of times... It's almost like the universe is responding to my thoughts as if I'm living in The Matrix. 😰 😂
So an air engine is a gasoline engine that instead of dynamic braking like a battery hybrid it uses cylinders to compress air that can then assist on acceleration. Problem is gas engines are 14% efficient and is still the only power source in the vehicle. This lie is in competition with Toyota. Pie in the sky at best.
Maybe they could just all combine the best things of all the types of power source and engines they have developed. That machine is going to be expensive, nightmarishly complicated and will have myriad of parts and systems that could go wrong but it could be the most efficient vehicle ever. Think of charging an EV also turns on a pump that fills up a massive HPA tank at the same. Instead of the electric motor being direct drive like all EV's today, the engine that utilizes compressed air and the electric motor could both compliment each other and converge their output on the same driveshaft. That would drastically increase the milage of the EV. Now if they made the engine into a hybrid that uses petrol OR hydrogen gas (if we want to go fully green) in conjunction with the air engine and electric motor, it's going to have the best things of all worlds!
I have a hard time watching this video. Air is not "fuel". The vehicle is driven by the pressure, not a chemical reaction. Stop calling it fuel. It's not fuel. The air needs to be compressed by a motor, the motor runs on fuel. Or it's compressed by an electric motor, and the electricity is generated by a motor running on fuel, or a solar panel, or a wind turbine. But compressed air can't be included in a vehicle in volumes or pressures that are safe for long distance travel. I don't want to be sitting in the vehicle when the 20Bar drive line feeding the rear axle pops. Nor do I want to be in the vehicle when the top speed drops to 50mph because the pressure is down to 10Bar. Nor do I want a vehicle that drives slower when high pressure weather systems move in. The only way to travel long distance in a compressed air driven vehicle is to build an air compressor into the vehicle, and then you're back to square 1, but with a driveline that loses 60% of it's efficiency on a good day. You can recover some of that by running a diesel generator at it's optimum speed to power a compressor, but's a still a net loss and another point of failure. Except the point of failure is a whole system. As a "can we do it" project, very cool; commercially, ridiculous.
It works almost the exact same as ICE, which is what we've been using for decades. The way he explained in the video is kind of dumb, and a lot of the clips of the components aren't even for a pneumatic engine. Very few things would have to change from a gasoline engine to a pneumatic engine. You will still have all 4 strokes of the engine as well, you just won't need to ignite anything anymore. And instead of a gas tank, you will need a tank to safely hold a lot of air. Which seems like a concern because if you get into a wreck, you'd expect any amount of impact to cause the air tank to explode, but they make air tanks (very expensive) that can hold thousands of PSI and can withstand impact. I don't understand why we would go for anything other than pneumatic engines at this point, EV's are terrible in comparison, the only good thing they offer is torque, other than that, they're just flaming death traps
@@turtlemcturtleson you realize you could never hold enough air to make a engine run off of air alone right? and the whle two motor idea like alot of EV's is too complicated and end up being junked or sold when it comes time to repair the non ice motor. tell me how many older prius dual motor vehicles do you see around still? almost none the price to repair them cost more than what the damn thing is worth cause they are so damn complicated, you aint fixing that shit in your driveway thats for damn sure. unless its a ice motor it aint gonna last ice motors will be what we use until we figure out a better way to store energy right now it doesnt exist. and the near future will be hydrogen vehicles stll internal combustion but a more efficient and cheaper to use ice engine. the issue they are having is the way to mometize the fuel when they figure that out you will see more talk about them. as for now aint no one investing in a motor where the fuel is too cheap or not able to be monetized effectively. right now they are trying to figure out an additive they can use to make a hyrogen motor not work off of water you can collect yourself
@@petejones6827 Maybe I'm reading your comment in the wrong tone, I wasn't trying to be aggressive or mean or anything towards you in my comment. But anyway, I thought the same thing about not being able to hold enough air, but they make some serious tanks that can hold a ton of air at thousands and thousands of PSI, which should be enough air I would think to power a car for a decent distance. At current technology though, I doubt you'd be able to tow with a pnuematic engine. There'd also be more capability for reusing fuel/air in an air powered engine as well. I don't know, I think it's possible, but right now, I'm cool with ICE, but it'll be awesome if pneumatic engines can work on a large scale
@@turtlemcturtleson yes but is that tank safe for traveling with? i dont think it would be. so to carry a tank with pressures that would be safe in an accident i dont think is possible atleast not yet. and yes the way i type comes off in the wrong tone i dont mean nothing by it its just how i communicate.
@@turtlemcturtleson now that could be cool reusing the air from a pnematic engine to feed the intake of the ice engine for better fuel effeciency sounds cool as fuck but then again i come back to i just font think having two motors on any vehicle is user friendly when repairs come to mind.
anything that cant be taxed or doesnt add to pollution must be banned
1:49 bro had to burp for a sec
I know 😂
Fuel
BEEN WAITING FOR THIS FOR YEARS NOW. WAY BETTER THEN EV OR WATER CARS, imagine everyone had an ev car. There would be hour a 2 hour long line up at the charging stations. They cost just as much as gas to fill. now imagine water fueled cars. Now our drinking water will go up in price like gas did when it was first introduced at .05 cents per gallon which went up 1067% if we used water and it went up 1067% we would see 46.00 dollars a gallon
Regenerative braking, an alternator type battery, and or friction heat powered uv panel design etc, should be able to restore the compressed air without charging station stops. A removable, chargeable electric air pump is additional option. Furthermore, if an oxygen air cannister is explosion risk, should be possible to modify compressed air tank with 50lbs battery to safely run a regular combustion engine any way. With no liquid fuel emissions tho
You have to get the energy from an energy source. Solar panel can only produce 250-300 w per square meter. You need much more than you can fit on the roof of a car.
@@beehappy7797 No, because heat from tire friction can light up LED lights, which can feed panel in car design. Modifying panel to use infrared spectrum can use friction heat directly, too. Friction heat source is hydraulics/ braking. It's about energy recovery, and the inertia physics is the energy source in such designs. Alternator is classic example of energy recovery already.
This engine would actually work if they used supercritical CO2 and the brayton cycle. otherwise power output is way too low.
These people just jump from one thing to another without actually seeing anything, firstly EVs are currently powering essential innovation and secondly having one dominant solution applied world wide is extremely unhealth...
I bought a high pressure pump to fill up a tank for paintball and possibly HPA air gun in the future a few months back. HPA air guns have come a long way and have so much power even rivaling guns that use gunpowder these days. Anyways, I thought if they ever used compressed air to power machines since it is a legitimate power source. I didn't look it up at that time and just came across this now. As stated in the video, someone already thought of it a long time ago.
There's a term called "frequency illusion" in psychology, not sure if that's what it is but every time I come up with an idea or think of a thought experiment, I hear a topic about it in the news or see videos about it later on. This has happened a lot of times... It's almost like the universe is responding to my thoughts as if I'm living in The Matrix. 😰 😂
Even me, so TH-cam's algorithm knows what I'm thinking!
I mean how light weight can we go?
We all have natural gas from our butt. And it will work just fine !!😅
Those flaws are almost the same as early EV's ... Its need some work to solve it first. And EV's arent so safe too if battery gets damaged.
Is the narrator AI?
Oh yes It is. Entire script is Chatgpt I bet.
I bet the entire script is Chatgpt
is there a way to nullify the sound of these high rpms?
why would you want to do that
would it cause noise pollution
@@redefinereditz im just teasing, the louder the better in my opinion
I think it can be isolated, just as they isolated electromagnetic pollution.
So an air engine is a gasoline engine that instead of dynamic braking like a battery hybrid it uses cylinders to compress air that can then assist on acceleration. Problem is gas engines are 14% efficient and is still the only power source in the vehicle. This lie is in competition with Toyota. Pie in the sky at best.
gasoline engine has (36%-42%) efficiency, diesel engine can reach more than that.
Maybe they could just all combine the best things of all the types of power source and engines they have developed. That machine is going to be expensive, nightmarishly complicated and will have myriad of parts and systems that could go wrong but it could be the most efficient vehicle ever.
Think of charging an EV also turns on a pump that fills up a massive HPA tank at the same. Instead of the electric motor being direct drive like all EV's today, the engine that utilizes compressed air and the electric motor could both compliment each other and converge their output on the same driveshaft. That would drastically increase the milage of the EV. Now if they made the engine into a hybrid that uses petrol OR hydrogen gas (if we want to go fully green) in conjunction with the air engine and electric motor, it's going to have the best things of all worlds!
When I see electronic circuits and how they are so over-complicated that they look like a crowded city, I know what you are saying!
Tata motors tried but failed miserably. :)
I think this invention for GM is successful
I have a hard time watching this video. Air is not "fuel". The vehicle is driven by the pressure, not a chemical reaction. Stop calling it fuel. It's not fuel. The air needs to be compressed by a motor, the motor runs on fuel. Or it's compressed by an electric motor, and the electricity is generated by a motor running on fuel, or a solar panel, or a wind turbine.
But compressed air can't be included in a vehicle in volumes or pressures that are safe for long distance travel. I don't want to be sitting in the vehicle when the 20Bar drive line feeding the rear axle pops. Nor do I want to be in the vehicle when the top speed drops to 50mph because the pressure is down to 10Bar. Nor do I want a vehicle that drives slower when high pressure weather systems move in.
The only way to travel long distance in a compressed air driven vehicle is to build an air compressor into the vehicle, and then you're back to square 1, but with a driveline that loses 60% of it's efficiency on a good day. You can recover some of that by running a diesel generator at it's optimum speed to power a compressor, but's a still a net loss and another point of failure. Except the point of failure is a whole system.
As a "can we do it" project, very cool; commercially, ridiculous.
F1 engine lastest fast secret
Steam engine comeback😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
this is WAYYYYY too complicated to be user friendly
It works almost the exact same as ICE, which is what we've been using for decades. The way he explained in the video is kind of dumb, and a lot of the clips of the components aren't even for a pneumatic engine. Very few things would have to change from a gasoline engine to a pneumatic engine. You will still have all 4 strokes of the engine as well, you just won't need to ignite anything anymore. And instead of a gas tank, you will need a tank to safely hold a lot of air. Which seems like a concern because if you get into a wreck, you'd expect any amount of impact to cause the air tank to explode, but they make air tanks (very expensive) that can hold thousands of PSI and can withstand impact. I don't understand why we would go for anything other than pneumatic engines at this point, EV's are terrible in comparison, the only good thing they offer is torque, other than that, they're just flaming death traps
@@turtlemcturtleson you realize you could never hold enough air to make a engine run off of air alone right? and the whle two motor idea like alot of EV's is too complicated and end up being junked or sold when it comes time to repair the non ice motor. tell me how many older prius dual motor vehicles do you see around still? almost none the price to repair them cost more than what the damn thing is worth cause they are so damn complicated, you aint fixing that shit in your driveway thats for damn sure. unless its a ice motor it aint gonna last ice motors will be what we use until we figure out a better way to store energy right now it doesnt exist. and the near future will be hydrogen vehicles stll internal combustion but a more efficient and cheaper to use ice engine. the issue they are having is the way to mometize the fuel when they figure that out you will see more talk about them. as for now aint no one investing in a motor where the fuel is too cheap or not able to be monetized effectively. right now they are trying to figure out an additive they can use to make a hyrogen motor not work off of water you can collect yourself
@@petejones6827 Maybe I'm reading your comment in the wrong tone, I wasn't trying to be aggressive or mean or anything towards you in my comment. But anyway, I thought the same thing about not being able to hold enough air, but they make some serious tanks that can hold a ton of air at thousands and thousands of PSI, which should be enough air I would think to power a car for a decent distance. At current technology though, I doubt you'd be able to tow with a pnuematic engine. There'd also be more capability for reusing fuel/air in an air powered engine as well. I don't know, I think it's possible, but right now, I'm cool with ICE, but it'll be awesome if pneumatic engines can work on a large scale
@@turtlemcturtleson yes but is that tank safe for traveling with? i dont think it would be. so to carry a tank with pressures that would be safe in an accident i dont think is possible atleast not yet. and yes the way i type comes off in the wrong tone i dont mean nothing by it its just how i communicate.
@@turtlemcturtleson now that could be cool reusing the air from a pnematic engine to feed the intake of the ice engine for better fuel effeciency sounds cool as fuck but then again i come back to i just font think having two motors on any vehicle is user friendly when repairs come to mind.
TH-cam commercials is out of hand how much money do you need to make TH-cam
I had something like 6 ads, crazy
😂
I think Toyotas Lies are better than this one.
garbage, don't waste your time...
What a crap video. The idea is arguable but the narrator cannot make up their mind ...
This video is terrible
We all have natural gas from our butt. And it will work just fine !!😅