Chemical Kinetics - Free Formula Sheet: bit.ly/3zYmDjy Direct Link to The Full 75-Minute Video: bit.ly/3iho1Fa Chemistry 2 Final Exam Review: th-cam.com/video/lSmJN1_uVpI/w-d-xo.html Chemistry PDF Worksheets: www.video-tutor.net/chemistry-basic-introduction.html
I came here to say thank you, I visited your channel on first year of the university for calculus and chemistry and i learned a lot of what my professors would never be able to explain. Now I graduated, almost forgot about the classes, but i will never forget you and your channel and i will keep supporting, thank you and i hope you have a great day. ❤️
at 13:48 I appreciate you mentioning this again (that M is mol/L ie Molarity) because sometimes people forget and just get more and more lost as the lecture continues. it helps to reinforce the knowledge by repeating sometimes.
This channel is amazing! My professor is currently teaching this... You clearly explained everything in 35 minutes than my 2 hour lecture. You are amazing!!
Yeah, but there are professors with 20 years of teaching expertise, yet they never changed their ways of teaching. It's an acceptable excuse for a beginning one, but not when you're 25 years into the job and still can't notice most of your students don't understand anything.@@2jnp
God bless you! You’re such a blessing in my life. I hope you know how much you mean a lot to most of us. I’m from Ethiopia studying here in the U.S, I couldn’t have done it without you!
i cannot stress enough how much you have helped me over the last two years. You make me enjoy chemistry so much and you explain all these concepts and topics so well. Thank you so much 💙
I love you sir... I felt really bad seeing you don't do biology You make math, physics, chemistry be like something I can learn within few minutes of watching I love you Soo much...much love from Nigeria ❤️
Indeed the saying is very true and it's the 1st time for me to feel how true it is ''There is know hard subject , only a good teacher and a bad one'' I took that course way back at college and after graduating and working in this field it's the 1st time to fully understand those basics great work keep up !
In india all of the education videos are in Hindi language... I am very grateful to have found at least one which teaches in English... Hats off to you sir .. thanks a lot
Professor Organic Chemistry Tutor, a huge thank you for a basic understanding of Chemical Kinetics in AP/General Chemistry. The interpretation and explanation of the Rate Law/Rate Law Expressions/Problems is outstanding from initial to final step. This is an error free video/lecture on TH-cam TV with the Organic Chemistry Tutor.
This is so helpful, Im currently doing IB and this concept for me was somewhat hard to grasp because we only spent a short amount of time on it. You explain it so well and concise
I wonder if one day we'll be talking about juan gonzalez like we're talking about feynman now. My dude over here has contributed more to education than all the ministers of education of every country combined🙏 if you read this, i love you! Thank you🙏❤
14:30, the answer supposed to be positive because [NO] is decreasing with time therefore we're supposed to multiply -8.2 x 10³ m/s with a negative sign (-), inclusion the final answer is 8.2 x 10³. Look it up in Zuhmdahl 9th Ed, page 555-556
Bless this man, give him a damn medal! No. A TROPHY with money on the side! How hard is it for lecturers to explain this stuff properly? Thank you from the (as Lady Camden said) the heart of my bottom!
I can't believe that I finally understood...... Mr.Organic Chemistry Tutor you are THE BEST thank you soooo much for the effort you put into this video thank you for explaining everything in as much detail and thank you for repeating and giving us many examples I really can't thank you enough
at 14:27, why don't you take into account the 1/2 since we're looking for the rate? aren't you supposed to multiply that by the change in NO over time?
i asked my chem prof this and she said that if it's just 1 reaction then you would use the idea that he did but he didnt clarify this lol. in real problems, you have to use the 1/coefficient rule
The problem asks for the average rate of disappearance of NO in the first 20 seconds. The average rate of disappearence is defined as -Δ[R]/Δt, where Δ[R] is the change in concentration of the reactant. The reason you don't divide by the coefficient is because that would give you the average reaction rate (Rate = 1/2 (-Δ[NO]/Δt)), not the average rate of disappearence of NO. Therefore, for NO, -(0,586 - 0,750) M / 20 s is the final answer, which should be positive, not negative like in the video. Also I believe there is a mistake in the chemical equation (although it doesn't matter for this problem), the product of this reaction should be 2NO₂, not 2NO.
Tho I always just say "Thank you" but I'm really² grateful. Thank you so much. You help us a lot. May you get blessings and help too whenever you need one
Thank you Ver Much... I really had a HArd time to understand the lesson because I kept disconnecting from class... thank you and please don't get tired of Making these kinds of video lessons
I just want to say thank u so much for the hard work u 've done...u just put so much effort in ur videos and u just hv a way to make it easy..My grades on chemistry changed so much. THANKS
Im actually from Nigeria and I must say, many students depend on your videos to catch up on the lectures. God bless you You will live long for us too😊😊
is the equation at 13:04 balanced incorrectly or is the product wrong? on the reactants side there are 4 oxygens and on the products side there are 2 oxygens. Shouldn't it be NO +O2 --> NO2 ?
Hi, i have a question about the NO example. why didnt you include the coefficients when calculating the rate of disappearance. isnt it suppose to be 1/2[NO]f-[NO]i/tf-ti ????
Chemical Kinetics - Free Formula Sheet: bit.ly/3zYmDjy
Direct Link to The Full 75-Minute Video: bit.ly/3iho1Fa
Chemistry 2 Final Exam Review: th-cam.com/video/lSmJN1_uVpI/w-d-xo.html
Chemistry PDF Worksheets: www.video-tutor.net/chemistry-basic-introduction.html
@obinna victor same here 😔😔😔
The links aren't working anymore 😭
❤❤AaaaaQ1a❤aaaaaaaaaaaaaAAAAAAÀaaaaaaaaaaaaAa❤❤11❤1❤❤❤❤❤❤
I came here to say thank you, I visited your channel on first year of the university for calculus and chemistry and i learned a lot of what my professors would never be able to explain. Now I graduated, almost forgot about the classes, but i will never forget you and your channel and i will keep supporting, thank you and i hope you have a great day. ❤️
Thank you 😊❣️
❤️🔥❤️🔥❤️🔥❤️🔥
from Ghana ?
God bless you sir. Jesus has led you this far.
@@concernkid yea
at 13:48 I appreciate you mentioning this again (that M is mol/L ie Molarity) because sometimes people forget and just get more and more lost as the lecture continues. it helps to reinforce the knowledge by repeating sometimes.
This channel is amazing! My professor is currently teaching this... You clearly explained everything in 35 minutes than my 2 hour lecture. You are amazing!!
i mean he's obviously better since most professors don't even have a teaching degree but this guy's been a tutor for years
Q
Yeah, but there are professors with 20 years of teaching expertise, yet they never changed their ways of teaching. It's an acceptable excuse for a beginning one, but not when you're 25 years into the job and still can't notice most of your students don't understand anything.@@2jnp
my gen chem 2 prof sends us ur videos instead of giving us a lecture and its probably for the best
LMAO
As he should
What a smart professor you have!
that prof is working smart and not hard lol
ladies and gentlemen, the reason i have an A in AP chem:
dude im in honors chem and we’re learning everything thats in ap chem its so dumb
@@bobbysmurda269 yup, exactly my issue
@William Young the small iq guys trying to fool chem lords lmfaoooo
@@ffire3795 what did the person say? the comment got deleted lol
God bless you! You’re such a blessing in my life. I hope you know how much you mean a lot to most of us.
I’m from Ethiopia studying here in the U.S, I couldn’t have done it without you!
I have a Chem exam tomorrow and I have been watching your videos all week! Thank you!
i cannot stress enough how much you have helped me over the last two years. You make me enjoy chemistry so much and you explain all these concepts and topics so well. Thank you so much 💙
I love you sir... I felt really bad seeing you don't do biology
You make math, physics, chemistry be like something I can learn within few minutes of watching
I love you Soo much...much love from Nigeria ❤️
He has biology/biochemistry playlists as of now
Indeed the saying is very true and it's the 1st time for me to feel how true it is ''There is know hard subject , only a good teacher and a bad one'' I took that course way back at college and after graduating and working in this field it's the 1st time to fully understand those basics great work keep up !
In india all of the education videos are in Hindi language... I am very grateful to have found at least one which teaches in English... Hats off to you sir .. thanks a lot
True and I hate it😵
Professor Organic Chemistry Tutor, a huge thank you for a basic understanding of Chemical Kinetics in AP/General Chemistry. The interpretation and explanation of the Rate Law/Rate Law Expressions/Problems is outstanding from initial to final step. This is an error free video/lecture on TH-cam TV with the Organic Chemistry Tutor.
IM LEARNING THIS RN
Same
This is so helpful, Im currently doing IB and this concept for me was somewhat hard to grasp because we only spent a short amount of time on it. You explain it so well and concise
IB is killing me lmaooo
I wonder if one day we'll be talking about juan gonzalez like we're talking about feynman now. My dude over here has contributed more to education than all the ministers of education of every country combined🙏 if you read this, i love you! Thank you🙏❤
hes still making these god bless this man
14:30, the answer supposed to be positive because [NO] is decreasing with time therefore we're supposed to multiply -8.2 x 10³ m/s with a negative sign (-), inclusion the final answer is 8.2 x 10³. Look it up in Zuhmdahl 9th Ed, page 555-556
Ain't it 8*10^-3 and it didn't come out as 50 for me
Wowwww
You really made my day Sir
I didn't get anything from my tutor when he was teaching me this topic.
God bless you sir
learned more from this 30 min video than I did from my 2hr lecture
The best rate video I found! I’m preparing for mcat , and this video helped so much !
Thank you!! I had such a hard time understanding this concept but now it seems so simple! I feel much more prepared for the test 👍
Best Stem page on youtube I'm a first year engineer student and he has saved me so many times
The GOAT. literally has lectures on every topic
Bless this man, give him a damn medal! No. A TROPHY with money on the side! How hard is it for lecturers to explain this stuff properly? Thank you from the (as Lady Camden said) the heart of my bottom!
I can't believe that I finally understood...... Mr.Organic Chemistry Tutor you are THE BEST
thank you soooo much for the effort you put into this video thank you for explaining everything in as much detail and thank you for repeating and giving us many examples
I really can't thank you enough
Your channel is so helpful to me! Thank you so much! Keep doing the great work👏🏼
Still in Uni because of this channel. Thank
Im happy I found ur channel, u made chemistry easy for me, thanks
You are a really underappreciated resource for all students. Keep it up!
Having a chemistry exam tmr, going to the organic chem teacher
thank you, this made everything a lot easier as always! been watching your stuff for help since years ago
at 14:27, why don't you take into account the 1/2 since we're looking for the rate? aren't you supposed to multiply that by the change in NO over time?
i asked my chem prof this and she said that if it's just 1 reaction then you would use the idea that he did but he didnt clarify this lol. in real problems, you have to use the 1/coefficient rule
It is cause we are finding rate of dissaperance of NO instead of rate of the reaction where we have to use 1/coefficient
At 14:23, wouldn't you need to add the (1/2) in front of your calculation given that the coefficient of NO is 2?
I came through the comment section for this but couldnt find the answer either
The problem asks for the average rate of disappearance of NO in the first 20 seconds. The average rate of disappearence is defined as -Δ[R]/Δt, where Δ[R] is the change in concentration of the reactant.
The reason you don't divide by the coefficient is because that would give you the average reaction rate (Rate = 1/2 (-Δ[NO]/Δt)), not the average rate of disappearence of NO.
Therefore, for NO, -(0,586 - 0,750) M / 20 s is the final answer, which should be positive, not negative like in the video.
Also I believe there is a mistake in the chemical equation (although it doesn't matter for this problem), the product of this reaction should be 2NO₂, not 2NO.
@@gabrielragum Hey, this was very helpful. Thank you.
Thank you so much! This really made what I was learning in class feel so much easier.
Tho I always just say "Thank you" but I'm really² grateful. Thank you so much. You help us a lot. May you get blessings and help too whenever you need one
Thank you Ver Much... I really had a HArd time to understand the lesson because I kept disconnecting from class... thank you and please don't get tired of Making these kinds of video lessons
I just want to say thank u so much for the hard work u 've done...u just put so much effort in ur videos and u just hv a way to make it easy..My grades on chemistry changed so much. THANKS
thank you so much!! no matter how many classes I attended it made no sense until now
I still don't get it 😭
your my soul animal
@@emmanuelpeter3872 u mean spirit animal LMFAO
@@advance6846 LOL
same 😥
This is tough to get a hold of
Just goes on thanking you every day!!!!!
Thank you so much 🙇, I really needed this for my exam later today.
Thank you so much for this helpful lesson! I was stuck on finding the rate constant and the units! This video made the concept so easy
VERY WELL APPRECIATED THIS, SIR!!❤
14:19 Why didn't you multiply by 1/2 since the coefficient of NO is 2?
Same question ... I was also surprised.. but I don't whether it is wright or wrong
SAME
Lucky to know smart teacher like u
Keep going
Hope your dreams come true 🤩🤩
Here before I rewatch this in a few years
I am. From ethiopia. I have seen you video. Help me. alot. Thanks. Teacher 🙏🇪🇹
Im actually from Nigeria and I must say, many students depend on your videos to catch up on the lectures.
God bless you
You will live long for us too😊😊
so true
You guys are a genius ❤❤
All the way from BIUST. Thank you for your help
Same here, he has made life easier for me
Im truly crying at how easy this is to learn. I was so clueless for days till I watched this video 😭
Wow this is literally soooo helpful thank you..you're a legend💃💃
This is the only person I’ve ever even considered buying their patreon lol
I understand these lessons far better than any.
I am a grade 12 students and I am ethiopian university entrance exam candidate but tnxs for you i am a confidence student for chemistry exam
Hello people! Where can I find a photo of this guy? Please help me, I really love his teachings and he's been a helping hand throughout my studies.
is the equation at 13:04 balanced incorrectly or is the product wrong? on the reactants side there are 4 oxygens and on the products side there are 2 oxygens. Shouldn't it be NO +O2 --> NO2 ?
you're literally a God sent!
Woww!! This is really cool. You make Chemistry so interesting
Your videos are good but don't make it boring 😊
Thanks for everything you’ve done. Truly remarkable
Very useful, thanks a lot : )
Lloyd Smith you have the Coolest channel ever !!
This was so helpful. Thank You!
The video was helpful, thank you❤❤
My Teacher < Our Teacher
Thank you! Im on my way to get my MA degree in teaching chemistry because of your channel! Please never stop sharing your knowledge!
i am watching you from ethiopia , thanks a lot ...
Thanks very much sir
I passed my Jupeb exam because of ur videos
Hi, i have a question about the NO example. why didnt you include the coefficients when calculating the rate of disappearance. isnt it suppose to be 1/2[NO]f-[NO]i/tf-ti ????
im wondering the same thing
you rly helped me out thanks ur amazing
Why didn't you use the (-1) / 2 for the Calculation of the rate in terms of NO? @13:48
why didn't you multiply by the coefficient ratio in minute 14:15 ?
I wish I could like this more than once.
great explanation
This videos can be binged watched
I really wish you are my tutor
Sake of some chemistry tutors confuse us alot .
You're the real MVP ⭐🌟✨
The reason why I'm totally changed to straight A is YOU. 💜💜💜
100x better than school✌️😆❤
Omg please post more kinetics xx
At 16:33 why was the coefficient of NO2 (4) not included in the calculation?
Thank you for the video! 28:41 for the 2 having a power of 1 is that mandatory for all the power?
ala you are the best😁........... your videos are interesting
Thank you very much, I love your videos ❤❤❤
i hate organic chemistry
having an exam next week and now watching this video in tears
+1🤧
+1 🤧
+1🤧
you are a godsend, at this point my diploma should be yours😩😩
Thank you❤️😊
Wonderful video, thanks a lot
Ur videos have saved my life many times. Also, im usually 4 years late
insanely good vid thanks mannn
Thank you very much for the easy understanding 😘👏👏
amazing video,very claer about units
Thank you so much😇😇😇 I finally understand.
Thanks so much for all you do
This is what I’m learning rn!
you the best.....continue with the Good stuff👍
Thank you soooo much 🙏 may the lord keep blessing you 🙏 ♥️
When ever I start watching this guy's videos for any topic I first comment to the comment section, and guess what😂
Thank you sir. This is so helpful.
this is a great explanation!