5 Rules You Didn't Know Were In The Rulebook | Yu-Gi-Oh!
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 ก.ย. 2024
- Comparison shop for the best prices on TCGplayer: bit.ly/3eBKXZh
Twitter: / dzeeff
Facebook: / dzeeffyoutube
⭐Equipment I use⭐
Computer: goo.gl/d1WQib
Monitor: goo.gl/24VnK4
Microphone: goo.gl/2Dt3aa
Video editor: goo.gl/TGSz6j
#YuGiOh #dzeeff
It seems like a few viewers are having audio issues around the 7:25 mark in this video. I watched the original file and didn't hear anything, and on my computer I couldn't hear anything weird, either. I think it's on TH-cam's end, sorry!
it was fine for me
I heard it on my phone. Between 7:00 and 8:00 the voiceover has a bit of static. Not too loud, but it is there. Not sure if it's the same on computers or tvs
I'm also getting static sounds around that part of the video.
I thought it was my earbuds, that's okay, can't help what TH-cam does to your video, still a good watxh
3:35 Will you do it for my birthday on the 27th of this month?
Petition for dzeeff to read the Yugioh rulebook for content.
Going over changes in the rule books would be pretty neat.
Dzeef ASMR
I need this.
Please no
It has to be the one from Starter Deck Yugi/Kiaba. Fusion Deck and Remove from Play are essential terminology 🙏🙏🙏
My favorite anime rule was at any point you could yell, "now it's my turn! I draw a card." and your opponents turn was over. No question asked.
Or the one where you can have you turn first because you say it
Magic: The Gathering has a 250-page comprehensive rulebook that contains everything you could possibly need to know about how the game works. It's a complete documentation of the game system that leaves nothing unspecified. Sure, it's not the first thing you'd read if you were learning the game, but you can reference it to answer any question about the game. Sometimes I wish Yu-Gi-Oh! had something similar. When I have a complex ruling question beyond what PCST can tell me, or I need to prove a ruling to someone else, oftentimes the only way to do that is to ask a judge or collate information from the wiki or several different blog posts. It would be nice to have a centralised, authoritative source of information that players can consult.
Although the wiki usually references its sources from official konami Q &As and such, so you can go to those if you want something more official (some of them are in Japanese though).
Yeah, I play MtG a lot and I love that comprehensive rulebook.
On top of that though, they also list every ruling made for a specific card on Gatherer.
I love being able to determine extremely complex questions from the comfort of my own home or my smartphone.
Usually we have questions about timing, triggers and interactions
Agree but due to yugioh having specific rulings for a single card and how it interacts in an specific chain of effects sometimes, I guess the book would be over 1000 pages, at that point would be better and faster checking the wiki/official sites.
The other nice thing is that except in weird edge cases 90% of the rules of magic work the way you expect them to. There's not really an equivalent to something like "Missed timing" or how special summons work. In MTG if an effect triggers it triggers, except in the case of about 20 cards that have a mechanic that specifically says "nothing triggers in response to this card". There's a difference between a creature being cast and being put onto the battlefield, but almost any time it matters the cards will actually SAY on them which version they care about so you don't have to look it up, etc...
Similarly, MTG implemented most of the good parts of problem solving card text a solid 12 years before Yu Gi Oh (although, as with Yu Gi Oh, templating improvements are always an ongoing project).
Additionally in MTG specific rules tend to trump general rules. I.E, what a card says it does tends to trump a game rule that says you can't do that, so if you had a monster reborn equivalent in MTG it doesn't matter how the card got into the graveyard, unless the card says it can't be brought back from the graveyard, you can bring it back.
Konami could probably learn a lot from MTG about basic rules design.
for the guy that said ''if you need to read the rulebook, the game is badly desingned'', try playing D&D without reading.
It's not really a fair comparison: in yugioh you have the cards (which you can read) to go off and play.
What you should say is: "try playing D&D without reading the manual, but with a character sheet at your disposal". Which is totally doable
@@DXYS95 it's Fair because he didn't specified, he generalized for all tabletop/board games.
@@alucard5841 Then it's just a really bad take and I gave it too much credit XD
@@DXYS95 It's not. I see a ton of people _try_ doing that, and they get so much stuff wrong that it'd be a huge stretch to call it D&D at that point anymore. It's basically like giving a deck of Yu-Gi-Oh cards who's only _heard_ of the Anime and maybe saw someone else play the game at some point and expect them to know what to do.
I mean, you can certainly do a lot of roleplaying with just a character sheet, but it's more D&D inspired than actual D&D.
That can be chaotic fun!
This was actually eye opening and cleared up so much
Don't forget the 0 attack monsters can't destroy each other
This is probably the most obscure rule in the book just because the situation so seldom occures.
@@chaos_ae I remember in rata and jimble's ojama mirror match (in ygopro) jimble attacked "just to see what happens"
*Waboku enters the chat*
@@chaos_ae wierd i thought that was well known though. As a kid i rationalized it as it's basically like a pillow fight neither can damage the other, but I guess I can see how it could be confusing.
That should happen in an anime if it hasn't already
Dude! I've learnt about the fact that you have to properly summon extra deck monsters first just few days ago, because I was reading the ruling book to understand way my overmind archfiend couldn't special summon the banished overmind archfiend when he left the field (I was working on an FTK combo with a cannon soldier and two copies of overmind archfiend). Also, I learnt about the fact that you can't use tokens as xyz materials also a week ago, and I learnt it the hard way (during a duel on YGOPRO 😂). Then, I read the priority rule from the ruling book during a duel with a friend on duelingbook (I wanted to activate an effect at the end of the main phase, and he said "oh, since you activate an effect it's no longer the end of the main phase" and he wanted to activate other effects (not in the same chain as mine) ); and, to finish off, I watched a video about colon and semi-colon few days ago. If you published this video two weeks ago I wouldn't have wasted that much time! 😂 Joke aside, I think I should read the entire ruling book once and for all! (It would honestly be very exciting and interesting).
(P.S. I apologise for any English mistake, I'm Italian...)
Kaiba: Screw the rule I have the money.
no that's Monopoly ^.^
Which rule Kaiba
@@tyreekl29 THE BOOK
Imagine playing Yu-Jo Friendship and forcing a hand shake in the that we're in
they actually updated the effect of the card, basically you have to agree to the idea of the handshake instead of physically doing. a handshake because people were doing gross shit to their hands prior to it
Did you know Pot of Greed let's draw 3 cards and summon a Pot of Greed
Welp. I never thought I would be this type of commenter, but...
Day 1 of asking Dzeeff to read the most up-to-date Yu-Gi-Oh TCG rulebook.
About the Semi-Colon, it’s not exactly cost. For instance targeting is an activation requirement before a semi-colon and must be done to resolve a card effect (even when you don’t pay the card’s cost) Discarding is a cost to activate a card, and can be bypassed to resolved the effect (like Diamond Dude back in the day)
I'm pretty sure they didn't mention it just to keep it more concise.
Huh that's weird. I've always thought of "cost" as "things you need to do in order to activate the card". So targeting has always been one of them in my mind since, well, you can't really activate MST without declaring what you're trying to destroy
Speaking of house rules as a child I was told you would subtract attack points from a monster who was attacked. So for example if dark magician attacks blue eyes dm would die and blue eyes would win but only have 500 attack left. So Celtic guardian could then finish it off.
4:46 Back in elementary school when I did not know I couldn’t tribute opponents monsters.
Mystic Wok was broken before that revelation 😅
5:01 this is true unless using something like the field spell lair of darkness, which has its own specified conditions ofc, but because of that this rule isnt 100% set in stone
I'm guessing the "If I have to read, it's not a good game" guy didn't do very well in school, considering that's what most textbooks are.
I'm guessing their thought process is that it should be pick up and play, or the anime should have all the general rules I need, but basically no game is so intuitive that you don't need to read SOMETHING to understand it. Even if you just go by the most basic of basics from the first days of the card game you have to understand about tributing, traps must be set for a turn, face down defense, etc.
0:56 The blue and green ones are common, but I've never heard of anyone using the pink or orange house rules before. Orange especially just seems like it would be tedious.
You should make reading the Yu-Gi-Oh! rule book front-to-back your April Fools Day 2021 video.
Honestly, that rule of not being able to special Summon an extra deck monster from the grave unless it has been properly summoned is a rule I don't like, only time I would agree is if a card is like CED, where it specifically has the text where it first needs to be special summoned with its own effect or for things like Invoked.
It may not mention the word cost, since not everything before the ; is a cost, example is targeting.
Since cost are something you pay, and there can be either done for activating a card effect, for a summon procedure, or the maintance cost of a card.
I like the way Rush duel cards specifically separate the requirement and effect in two separate sections, much easier to understand than mster duel cards.
The worst thing is that a lot of the stuff people complain about not being in the rulebook is not just in the rulebook but even in these abridged beginner's guides you get in structure decks. (chainblocking or summon conditions for example)
You can say what you want about yugioh being too complex for beginners and card interactions being counterintuitive at times and you probably wouldn't be wrong but there's nothing in the game that can't be explained with the rulebook.
Great vid and interesting topic and also here's an interesting video idea
what cards have seen play but have never seen play before or cards that previously have seen play but has been dropped from play once the old school rules of priority was changed
could also explain the difference of old school priority to current rules priority for new players
"If i have to read a rulebook to play a game, then the game is not designed very well" this doesnt even make sense, at bare minimum you need to read the rulebook or have someone else read it just to know the basics of deck size and win conditions
Those people are the same people that skip the tutorial for a new game lol
Know anything about "Performapal U-go golem", it seems powerful but requires itself and a dragon type monster to fusion summon any fusion monster, without restrictions on that fusion monster of course like if it says "must use materials or specific cards and cannot be summoned by other means, U-go golem is like "the light: hex sealed fusion" but allows itself to fuse monsters when pendulum summoned, I must figure out Performapal U-go Golem's effect as it seams like I can summon any non restricted monster using itself and a dragon
Nothing on U-Go Golem even implies it cheats fusion materials. All it does is let you fusion summon with it and any dragon type monsters you control. The fusion materials still need to be correct.
On the topic of rulings, (heres an example that happened):if borreload attacks infinitrack megaclops, can borreload taje control of it. Been trying to find someone who can *officially* answer it.
That special summon from the graveyard thing is a thing that has been bothering me since the beginning of time
I feel like the main cause of Yu-gi-oh! Ruling problems is that pretty much every Ruling has a note of "unless otherwise specified" lol
Just make it a rule: if card text and rulebook text contradict, card text wins. (Exemple: a card that skip your opponent's next turn contradicts the rulebook that says when your turn is over it's the next player's turn)
i always wondered why cards in the video games were marked if they were special summoned.
Ok i think the rulebook answered this question but I’m not sure if it’s included because it wasn’t directly mentioned. When looking at the spell speed section describing when card effects and counters resolve their effects, it never mentioned some technicalities that I’ve been grown up doing. For example, we would use mirror force or book of moon on a monster to negate its attack, but it never illicitly states that it negates the attack, but according to spell speed, traps and quick play spells have a higher spell speed than monster effects/monster events like attacking, so in theory, the counters to the attack should resolve before the attack is conducted, basically negating their action. Is this the case? Or is it that a card like mirror force allows a monster to resolve its action and then destroy it, despite the trap card having a higher spell speed? Any answers are appreciated, thank you for this video!
mirror force negates the attack
I don't care if its the rule or not, Stardust Dragon should be able to revive itself if summoned off Starlight Road. IMO, any effect that summons from the extra deck should be considered "properly summoned".
So does that also mean I can't monster reborn an Instant Fusion or Metamorphosis target?
Instant fusion and metamorphosis count as proper fusion summon, so yeh you can reborn them if you want.
Metamorphosis has a very old text and it was never errated since it has spent the better part of the last decade banned, nowadays cards that special summon and counts as the proper summoning method (xyz, synchro or fusion) usually indicate it in the card text.
Instant fusion for instant does say that it counts as a fusion summon.
It is a dumb ruling yeh but it is made to not be abused for certain ED monsters.
If you are in Canada and you don't want pay ridiculous shipping, your better off with Atlast Collectibles or Dolly's over TCG, you should do sponsors for one of them along with TCG
Does the audio sound distorted around 7:30 for anyone else or is that just me?
I noticed it too
i have a question for everyone. anti spell fragrance says cant activate a spell card you set it.
the dark magicians say if you draw a quickplay spell or trap witb its effect you can set and activate that turn..... witch card gets right of way? trap because its effects in play or the monster?
But does the rulebook explain how pot of greed works?
Here we see DZeeff getting almost pissed to the bone
This is amazingly helpful I thank you very much 😎🔥💯
A rule that I didn't know existed until I bought legacy of the duelist is that the first turn player doesn't draw on the first turn anymore.
Been that way since 2014 iirc
@@RinaShinomiyaVal I won't lie, I stopped following the changes and the ban list back in 2010 or maybe even earlier. I dipped out at XYZ summons.
Is this... is this “commenters don’t understand the rules?”
Honestly, I think the "Properly summon" rule is pretty dumb. You should've been able to summon them regardless unless it says otherwise
If they wanted to change this, the chance was 20 years ago. It would break a lot of stuff now because cards were designed knowing they cannot be summoned in certain ways.
@@Skasaha_ I know. But it's one of those hidden rules which you won't know unless you actually read through it. Also, nice Anna pic.
I use polymerization on a Medusa card and Zombie dragon to get a golden bone MAMMOTH!!!!
IT'S REALLY FINE!!!!!!
I still don't understand why you can sometimes activate a normal trap card in response to a quick-play spell or counter-trap when the rulebook very clearly sais you can't.
You can always activate a Normal Trap in response to a Quick-Play Spell so I'm not sure what you mean by that (other than Super Poly obv), but the only things that can chain to Counter Traps are other Counter Traps. I guess I'd need an example to understand your question better
@@Dzeeff wait, did traps always have the same spell-speed as quick-play spells?
That would explain it, I guess I remember that wrong from when I read the rules all the way back when I started playing.
This is exactly like what you said in the video though, because I stopped playing IRL games a long time ago and only played using digital simulators, so I didn't have to remember all the rules exactly.
Yeah, Traps and Quick-Plays have always been Spell Speed 2
I didn't have a rule book because I got my deck from a friend, so had to learn all these from people telling me (mostly angrily)
Could you theoretically summon „Dystopia, the Desponent“ with the four tokens provided by „Scapegoat“?
Nope, as the cost to summon Dystopia is to send the monsters to the graveyard. Tokens can not go to the gy.
best thing ever happened that they discarded the old priority
As someone who wants to get back Into yugioh, how prevelant are hand traps in the games? I want to get back using other satellarknights, vampires and classic archfiends.
Very prevelant. Staple status. Things like Infinite Impermance are very much handy
Lets say I draw into my 4th card.
Can opponent use trap dustshoot before I even choose to set or activate a card?
I mean use my turn priority.
If you have a Quick Effect you can use in the Draw Phase then you get the first action
Weird rule 1 no shifting on other decks
What does Pot of Greed do?
Sadly, these are all very basic rulings. I think the only one that tend to trip up certain OG players can be the priority of fast effects/turn player priority. Gotta remind people how it works sometimes.
Reads the rulebook
Forgets everything 🙃
I had this exact problem when I played 40K
People cheating all the time as they never read the rules
Master rule 4 of monopoly was so much better than 5 🤷♂️
I disagree you don't read rule books to play like the creators intended you read it to be able to make the game even more like you want it to be. I was always the person that had to read the rules before playing a game but that did not stop us from also adding new rules that we thought it would make the game more fun.
yea, pretty sure those monopoly house rules, are universal....
Heres a question, can you special summon Plasma or Dogma from Dreadmasters effect?
No
@@Dzeeff didn't think so. What about fusions?
i learned yugioh from dueling network. RIP
DuelingBook is its spirtual sucessor. And it pretty much looks the same.
Cheating?!?! No, no, no.
Anime Tactics. 😏
Ah, the JoJo method: "If the enemy is cheating, simply cheat harder than them."
@@joshuakim5240 all fun and games till you get to part six.
@@joshuakim5240 a year later, but imma stop you right there: that's the Tiger Mask method.
Infinity +1
“What most players don’t understand about yugioh!”
*reads entire rule book*
You think players are going to read the rule book when they don’t even read the card effects.
Some guy who hates the Egyptian Gods reads the Yu-Gi-Oh! Rulebook
*The latest audiobook by Dzeeff*
Monopoly Auction Rule: If you mention it, everyone thinks you're crazy. If you point to it in the rules, everyone thinks you're an asshole.
It shorters games for me because players bid absurd amount of money every time xD
@@laytonjr6601 I think that was the intent of the rule, to speed up the game so people get property more quickly. Plus it more closely matches a real economy. But it seems the rule complicates the game too much for most people.
The only one of those house rules we used was the free parking one because it was fun even though we knew it was not a real rule
@@laytonjr6601 I think most of Monopoly's popular house rules make the game longer, and everyone ignores the time limit variant as well. Then people complain the game is too long.
"If I have to read the rulebook to play a game, the game isn't well-designed" is one of the dumbest things I've ever heard.
Totally, by that logic would chess be a poorly designed game?
Since by looking at the pieces you cant figure out how the game works,
let alone castling or more advanced things.
Well Chess has no rulebook
@@johnapple6646 well rulebook is a book with rules in it so chess does have that
Indeed if you can play a game without reading the rules that game is just too simple not well design.
That guy must have forgotten how difficult it was to play children games with salty kids who change the rules just to make it harder for anyone to win.
As a wise man once said.
Screw the rules.
I have green hair
"Commenters Dont Understand Da Rulez"
Wands: Pbbbbth!
*Yugioh Players
Weirdly how monopoly house rules always extend the game more
Which is why they're all awful rules, Monopoly is already too long without house rules
@@BassForever monopoly isn’t really that long.
Maybe like 2 hours tops.
Gotta keep from eliminating the kids too early or they'll throw a fit.
Free Parking payouts alone make a long game.
@@rud5101 I actually think this may be part of it. The common house rules of Monopoly keep people in the game longer, and kids tend to get sour when they're taken out early. I bet a lot of these house rules came about because parents wanted their kids involved for as long as possible.
Don't worry guys, the 5 rules we didn't know were in the Rulebook are mentioned at 11:26.
4:50
Another interesting ruling about tokens that is obvious to long time players but unintuitive for newer players and is actually the reason tokens cannot be used as Xyz material is that tokens only ever exist on the field. If a token would be moved to any other zone, such as the hand or graveyard or the "Xyz material zone", it instead ceases to exist. So, since cost is payed before resolution, if you were to try to Xyz summon with tokens the tokens would dissappear before the actual summon could be initiated.
My head canon reason was that overlaying tokens was a stupid concept and as such, wasn't allowed. This explains why trap monsters are usable while tokens are not. It's funny that it works out in a way.
This still doesn't explain it though: if I paid the cost to summon a monster, it should still be summoned. In this case the xyz monster would be summoned, but it would have no xyz materials.
It doesn't make any sense other than "well yeah, it's too easy to make multiple tokens with the same level, so using them for xyz summons would be kinda broken, let's not do that"
Konami: After 20 years, somebody finally read the rulebook...
My friends and I learned from the rule book when the first structure decks were released. That was probably the hardest way. Especially seeing as the cards and the rulebook were vague as hell.
You don’t understand the feeling of dropping Perfectly Ultimate Great Moth in the lunch room after setting Pinch Hopper the previous turn.
I was one of those kids who obsessively read the rulebook.
Same lol. I have an old old rule book that’s really nice
I remember reading the rulebook a bunch as a kid several times and we still got things wrong.
me too, but that was so long ago that I forgot most of it.
I even forgot which cards were what spell speed, because I just let the computer do that for me since I haven't played a real game in like 15 years.
That monopoly poster was amazing. I broke every one of those rules
But why did the money in poster have symbols from Bleach on them?
Yeah. People complain that the game takes too long but if you play with the exact rules in the book it doesn't take too long
I love how people thought that being in jail meant you couldn't collect rent.
That would be fair, but this isn't fairness, it's capitalism! 🤑🤑🤑
@@devonhilt9389 It's still bad with the real rules. I've always played by the book, but it still takes up to two hours and the main problem - the fact that there's literally no choice to make at any point - remains.
@@hannessteffenhagen61 Considering that the game was originally meant to be anti monopoly/capitalist commentary, I think the fact that there's no real choice and it just comes down to who is lucky in the beginning means it is pretty successful
Me and my brother got into the game after links where added and when it said you could summon extra deck monsters to link zones, we thought that meant you could summon that to your opponents field. Safe to say I was really annoyed when he summoned all over my field and I had no extra deck for the most part.
"Oldschool Priority ruling"
You just triggered one of my old nightmares. x.x; Aaaaaah~~!
I haven't read it in a while but back in 2013, I downed the whole thing in a few days of reading, verifying, looking at my deck and reading more. Would love to see some of your favorite obscurities in this rulebook. =)
just curious, how did old-school priority work?
@@Nerobyrne I may be butchering the rule a little bit, but you could basically activate non quick effects immediatly after you summoned your monster before the opponent could respond. That's one of the reasons why Chaos Emperor Dragon used to be so powerful. Once you dropped him on the field, you could instantly activate his effect without giving your opponent a chance to respond, making cards like Botomless or Book of Moon useless. I'm not sure how this interaction worked with counter traps tho.
@@shipu302 oh, yeah I remember that.
It basically turned "Exiled Force" into a better version of "Tribute for the Doomed", which is probably why it got banned. Although, it did still cost your normal summon, but not if you could revive it with another card.
@@Nerobyrne I hated that card in the videogames. I swear the AI new when I had Trap Holes set and would mock me by summoning it and immediately triggering it's effect.
Bold of you to assume I've read any rules from the rulebook. I am a yugioh player after all.
Do you read your own cards at least?
@@ZenoDLC of course not. That was implied with me stating I'm a yugioh player
it's okay, I can explain: according to my rulebook there are three fundamentally different types of card: monster cards, trap cards and magic cards ...
"A game isn't well designed if i have to read a rulebook"
... isn't a game a set of rules? with a set of playing pieces? in which you use the pieces within the rules of the game? ???? da fuq????
A lot of people only use the rules as orientation to make up their own. Just look at UNO. There are probably 1000 different ways to play that.
Wait this game has a rulebook???
Wait.......This game has RULES?!?!?!
screw the rules! I got money
That exact game ..eternal duelsist soul for GBA is how i learned to actually play before that my friends amd i would just use duelist kingdom rules and the winner was who had the most momsters in the graveyard by the end of the bus ride🤣
Me: see monopoly part
Still me: laughs in reading the entire monopoly rulebook and never cheated in it since years
It sucks when you do something that the rules allow, but everyone calls you a cheater for doing so.
Say someone is staring at their cellphone and you land on one of their properties. Instead of paying rent you decide to hand the dice to the next player and they go. That is perfectly legal as the rules state you must be asked for rent, if not, you don't owe it. Once the next player's turn starts, you are free of paying that rent.
This rule is done incorrectly so much that even the "Cheaters" edition of Monopoly messes it up by calling that cheating.
The “Cheaters Edition” calling it cheating means that this version considered it cheating, so the rule was updated. It’s like any other errata such as Goyo Guardian needing an EARTH Tuner.
@@JRDeBo the ENTIRE POINT of Monopoly is to be as cut throat and unfair as possible within the limits of the rules. So skipping paying rent because the owner wasn't paying attention is right on brand with the game.
@@runningoncylinders3829 actually, if you go to their website and look up the official rules for Monopoly, it still states you don't need to pay rent if it wasn't asked for. So it's only "cheating" in the cheaters edition.
house rules aren't really cheating.
It is wild though that house rules are so universal that the makers of the game know about them ^.^
And don't forget the most important rule: When activating Yu-Jo Friendship with Unity you don't have to actually physically shake your opponent's sweaty greasy hand.
Judge's best friends:
1)Policy Documents
2)Rulebook
3)The chart
The guy that disliked this was the one guy that didnt bother to read the rules
The video or this comment?
This series should be called Yu-gi-oh players don't like to read.
That could very well be a neat series. Many people look in awe at black rose dragon when I use its effect after synchro summoning as if they forgot or didn’t even know it existed.
Bruh the rulebook is over 200 pages long
@@OsirusHandle Precisely Dzeef reads it... So we don't have to.
I definitely didn't know about special summoning from the extra deck thing. The stardust effect I definitely happened to me idk why it didn't revive at the time lol. Great video 💕
Ok for the 150k special you could read the intire rule book
When I was young, I knew the official rules, but still used anime effects and thought Relinquished was a nearly unbeatable monster...Lmao...
The "if I have to read a rulebook the game is bad" guy has never played chess or any other "competitive" tabletop game in their life
yeah, honestly how do they think this works?
If you want to find out how any game works, you have to read the rules or ask someone who has read them.
You don‘t need a rulebook for chess. The set-up is quite easy. The problem are the countless strategies that you have to think of EVERY SINGLE TURN!
Dzeeff be like:
Reading every normal type monster for a video? YEET
Reading the entire rule book for a video? Naw.
6:40 - Something that confused me back in the day was cards that say "ignoring the summoning conditions", but still cannot Special Summon Fusion monsters from the GY that were not properly summoned before. So something like Elemental HERO Core cannot Special Summon a Nova Master ("Must be Fusion Summoned.") that was sent directly from Extra Deck to GY, even though it ignores summoning conditions.
So from what I can tell, ignoring summoning conditions does not mean you can summon an Extra Deck monster from the GY before it was properly summoned, BUT you can still use a card like Neos Fusion to Special Summon a Fusion monster directly from the Extra Deck.
It's kinda KSS (Konami Says So). When the first card with the text "ignoring summoning conditions" was released (I think it was Level Modulation, can't remember), it had the ruling that the monster had to be "properly summoned" to be a valid target. This was to prevent people from cheating Horus the Black Flame Dragon LV8 for easy spell negation but the card did such a poor job of relaying that information back then.
The most important thing that is missing here is an explanation on how "if" and "when" effects work aka "missing timing"
Because newer players get really confused by that
6:37 why does it specifically say spell card can call of the haunted bring back and extra deck monster sent with gale dogra?
No, extra deck monsters (and ritual monsters) if weren't summoned by their own method can't be summoned in any way, unless it's their own method (like drytron ritual summon from gy, otherswise you can't)
No, it was just am example. No card that can special summon an extra deck monster (and Ritual monsters, and 'special summon monsters', such as your typical chaos monster) from the GY or from being banished unless that monster was first summoned correctly.
It's such a weird rule. Why does it even exist?
@@hhaavvvvii because special summon first monsters are usually more powerful than "regular" monsters, since you have to jump through some hoops to get them onto the field (granted the difficulty may vary between different monsters). To prevent players from simply ignoring that condition and just sending the monster to the GY then reviving them, they need to be special summoned correctly at least once, thus forcing the player to meet the requirement and fulfil the balancing condition.
Doug: So I read the rule book
Yugioh players: What does pot of greed do again?
The last point is a bold face lie, Doug.
Turn Player's priority: *exist*
Quick effect: I'mma pretend I didn't see that.
You can't activate a quick effect unless your opponent does something in their turn. What's wrong about that?
@@adrianmg7359 So when your opponent shot guns off a floodgate during the standby phase, what are they doing it in response to? You drawing a card?
You mean you are gonna try to cheat? If your opponent gave up his prio that's a different thing. And also, if the effect can trigger outside MP (say SP and DP) that's still a different thing, as most players give up prio on those phases.
@@MrChillaxin2010 usually its cause you don't do anything so you have to pass priority to your opponent before you can change phases. note that they can't use that floodgate before you have a chance to do a quick effect first.
You automatically pass prio when trying to change phases.
Going by nibirus post, lets make dzeef live stream him self reading every single official ruling and rule book etc.
I adore you!!!!!!!! Thanks for the content! 💖💖
That moment when you didn't know the differences between soft OPT and hard OPT, so you just turned Satellarknight from a controlling deck into Virtual World Beta Version. Yes, that was how I destroyed my playground with Vega => Altair => Vega => Altair => Deneb combo!
Considering the amount rule breaking cards; I feel the needto point out that the rules for Yu-Gi-Oh has become extremely complicated compared to old days.
Literally just learn Problem Solving Card Text. 99% of ruling issues solved.
Wait... There's a rulebook?
Day 14 of waiting for good new Crashbug support.
Stfu