Glad to help man! Yeah I always thought oh too bad, probably something wrong with my laptop or software until I did some tests. Just deleted about 500GB of ProRes files, feels good 😄
Thanks for this. Am gonna give Gyroflow a go as get too many artifacts with Davinci stabilisation. Do you find Gyroflow much better than DR's stabilisation ? Thanks again
Happy if it helped! Overall I do think Gyroflow can achieve better results than the in-build stabilizer, but of course its a more involved workflow still. I do think Gyroflow gets less artifacts but of course there is also limitations to its capabilities
@@flo-photo yeah tried that, but sadly it doesnt work and the stabilization gets messed up as soon as I copy the composite clip in another timeline.. would be amazingly smooth if it would work!
So with the plug in and your shooting in 8:7 it's still two steps - stabilize and export in daVinci (meaning compression of the original and a big file if you want to minimize compression) and then import the big file into daVinci again and export again, with another compression. I don't see that you have changed your basic workflow, except substituting daVinci+plugin for gyroflow desktop in the first step.
Yep its not much faster if you think in steps of workflow, but Davinci is much faster in rendering than the gyroflow app with ProRes, I can directly apply color grading and any other editing I want to the OG-File and the exported „master file“ is still much smaller, ofc depending which codec is choosen. Also it works better with how I structure my data base which is dedicated to Davinci, thats no problem if we talk about 1-10 files, but when you start to have hundreds of clips scattered on different folders or even ssd‘s, it gets more important
@@JoelSharks There maybe a speed advantage. But, If you go two steps of compression you want the first to have low compression whichever editor is used first. So, ProRes for the first render for either workflow. No file size advantage either way.
@@markr041 and btw, something I only realized by now, with this workflow even if I render in Prores 422, I can get smaller file sizes as I can stabilize, render snd export only the parts of the footage that i need and not the whole clip. I dont know if the gyroflow app can do it too, but anyway it is much more intuitive for me to do it in Davinci 🤙🏾
what kind of files? beside some expectations like 360 footage its usually all the same process, try look for tutorial explaining the basics of davinci resolve
installed the gyroflow plugin and when i use it the playback of my video really lags a long time..is there a waiting time for it to be applied?
Thank you bro! It's so simple but im not thought of it!
Glad to help man! Yeah I always thought oh too bad, probably something wrong with my laptop or software until I did some tests. Just deleted about 500GB of ProRes files, feels good 😄
@@JoelSharks уеs, i understand you, thanks again, dude🤟
Thank you! Very Helpful 🙏
Happy to help 😁🙏🏾
Thanks for this. Am gonna give Gyroflow a go as get too many artifacts with Davinci stabilisation. Do you find Gyroflow much better than DR's stabilisation ? Thanks again
Happy if it helped! Overall I do think Gyroflow can achieve better results than the in-build stabilizer, but of course its a more involved workflow still. I do think Gyroflow gets less artifacts but of course there is also limitations to its capabilities
You have to wait for the cache to be redered also. The red line should be blue in order to get a smooth worflow!
instead of rendering it could you not just make it a composite clip and move it to another time line?
@@flo-photo yeah tried that, but sadly it doesnt work and the stabilization gets messed up as soon as I copy the composite clip in another timeline..
would be amazingly smooth if it would work!
@@JoelSharks is that also the case in the new resolve 19?
So with the plug in and your shooting in 8:7 it's still two steps - stabilize and export in daVinci (meaning compression of the original and a big file if you want to minimize compression) and then import the big file into daVinci again and export again, with another compression.
I don't see that you have changed your basic workflow, except substituting daVinci+plugin for gyroflow desktop in the first step.
Yep its not much faster if you think in steps of workflow, but Davinci is much faster in rendering than the gyroflow app with ProRes, I can directly apply color grading and any other editing I want to the OG-File and the exported „master file“ is still much smaller, ofc depending which codec is choosen. Also it works better with how I structure my data base which is dedicated to Davinci, thats no problem if we talk about 1-10 files, but when you start to have hundreds of clips scattered on different folders or even ssd‘s, it gets more important
@@JoelSharks There maybe a speed advantage. But, If you go two steps of compression you want the first to have low compression whichever editor is used first. So, ProRes for the first render for either workflow. No file size advantage either way.
@@markr041 and btw, something I only realized by now, with this workflow even if I render in Prores 422, I can get smaller file sizes as I can stabilize, render snd export only the parts of the footage that i need and not the whole clip. I dont know if the gyroflow app can do it too, but anyway it is much more intuitive for me to do it in Davinci 🤙🏾
i can't figure out how to add a file in davinci i have m1 mac and davinci studio
what kind of files? beside some expectations like 360 footage its usually all the same process, try look for tutorial explaining the basics of davinci resolve