That's why I like Your videos. Other YT English teachers just mention AI, you are going deep into it. I agree with your prediction. but it's not easy to achieve 200 K subscribers. Congratulations, and I hope the profits from TH-cam will compensate for the lost income.
Not anytime soon. It can't even figure out what a yod is. I've repeatedly asked it to list examples of words with various IPA sounds in them and it's frequently wrong.
As an English teacher, I agree, English tutors are possibly largely unemployable by 2030. However, I think that’s because a significant amount of learning will change from “I’m learning for my needs in the future,” to “I’m only interested in learning what I need when I need it.” It’s kinda like how people no longer earn how to do car or house maintenance in advance. They simply google and watch youtube vids when stuff breaks.” It’s more efficient, and arguably more effective. I think things like language learning and translation will fall under this same sort of category. In fact, why learn another language at the point that you have a babblefish in your pocket (or shoved in your ear). Just learn one language well enough and use your tech to take care of the rest? That said, it will be public school teachers who will continue to be employed for quite some time - children still need to be babysat, and unions will keep the teachers employed as such until the whole system finally changes (long after it should have - because that’s how governments work).
Yes. I think the teachers who provide spaces for meaningful (and social) experiences will continue to thrive. Whereas more utility-based teaching will either move into the entertainment category or disappear.
First of all, I have nothing against language teachers. I believe that my job will disappear because of AI, so please don't think I'm being unempathetic when talking about yours. If the question is whether 100% of English teachers will lose their jobs, then all you said in the video is very insightful and honest (kudos to you for not burying your head in the sand). If the questions is whether 99.9% of English teachers will lose their jobs, then only the first 12 minutes of your video are needed to answer that.
@@CloudEnglish I know, and that's why I implied that the first 12 minutes of your video explain why you are wrong in your last two and an half minutes. In the best case scenario language teachers will be as common as other professionals like watchmakers are today.
Some version of this is coming. Maybe not the end of teaching, but something radically different. More AI (class mgt, marking, sourcing materials) = more teacher/student building relationships, mentorship, and storytelling. My general rule for all things AI is that advances will happen faster than people think but its disruption on industry/professions will take longer than people think. The teaching profession will likely be the last profession to change as a result of AI. Unions, governments, administrative churn will create resistance to the benefits of AI by focusing on the negatives and not the positives (Who really likes marking? Why does it take so long to get student's feedback? Why are we not using the data created by tests to make learning better/faster/more efficient?)
Nice opinion. I'm on the same page with you. Even if AI gets improved, teachers won't disappear. But the method of learning might be changed - Better or worse way -
As for me, there is a financial reason why I use AI more. If I had more money, I would have more online lessons with my private teacher. But my salary is so bad. For me, it is still strange to speak to my phone. I would rather have a conversation with a "real" English teacher 😊
The shift from gas lamplighters to electricians and horse-drawn carriage roles to automotive jobs shows how old professions were replaced by new ones adapted to emerging technologies. But with AI assistants potentially taking over language teaching, we may face a different scenario. Language teachers could be replaced without a new wave of jobs. While it seems logical to think we’d need more programmers for AI, that assumption is misleading; modern AI is increasingly self-programming and self-improving. This could mark a unique turning point where technology doesn’t spark an equivalent wave of new employment, leaving fewer opportunities to fill as AI takes over. Note: by the way, I suck in English and this message was written by ChatGPT 😂
No matter how AI becomes sofisticated, we still need technical support on how to use it. Teacher should become like that in future anyway. Does community college education help you to become billionare? I think AI can replace teacher. But, it does not determine your success. It all comes down to luck, determination, and choice. We have both good and bad doctors, lawyers, etc We need to have good AI tech support for English education as well.
12:19 definitely, instead of being afraid of it we gotta take it as an advantage
謝謝！
Thank YOU 🙏
“This was hilarious! The whole ‘moving to a tent because AI took over’ idea-super clever and so funny!”😂
It’s getting cold out here though 🥶
That's why I like Your videos. Other YT English teachers just mention AI, you are going deep into it. I agree with your prediction. but it's not easy to achieve 200 K subscribers. Congratulations, and I hope the profits from TH-cam will compensate for the lost income.
Thank you for your concern. The tent thing is just a way of approaching the topic. Business is better than ever.
Not anytime soon. It can't even figure out what a yod is. I've repeatedly asked it to list examples of words with various IPA sounds in them and it's frequently wrong.
🤣🤣🤣🤣 a yod 🤣🤣🤣🤣 i died hahahaha!!! bloody yabbo
@@Tollie_TollieIf you don't use a yod in pew, music & view, then how do you say those words?
I cannot understand this entire thread.
As an English teacher, I agree, English tutors are possibly largely unemployable by 2030. However, I think that’s because a significant amount of learning will change from “I’m learning for my needs in the future,” to “I’m only interested in learning what I need when I need it.”
It’s kinda like how people no longer earn how to do car or house maintenance in advance. They simply google and watch youtube vids when stuff breaks.” It’s more efficient, and arguably more effective.
I think things like language learning and translation will fall under this same sort of category.
In fact, why learn another language at the point that you have a babblefish in your pocket (or shoved in your ear). Just learn one language well enough and use your tech to take care of the rest?
That said, it will be public school teachers who will continue to be employed for quite some time - children still need to be babysat, and unions will keep the teachers employed as such until the whole system finally changes (long after it should have - because that’s how governments work).
Yes. I think the teachers who provide spaces for meaningful (and social) experiences will continue to thrive. Whereas more utility-based teaching will either move into the entertainment category or disappear.
First of all, I have nothing against language teachers. I believe that my job will disappear because of AI, so please don't think I'm being unempathetic when talking about yours.
If the question is whether 100% of English teachers will lose their jobs, then all you said in the video is very insightful and honest (kudos to you for not burying your head in the sand). If the questions is whether 99.9% of English teachers will lose their jobs, then only the first 12 minutes of your video are needed to answer that.
My conclusion at the end of the video is that English teachers aren’t going anywhere.
@@CloudEnglish I know, and that's why I implied that the first 12 minutes of your video explain why you are wrong in your last two and an half minutes. In the best case scenario language teachers will be as common as other professionals like watchmakers are today.
@@reo.incognitoit is certainly possible. Very uncertain times.
Some version of this is coming. Maybe not the end of teaching, but something radically different. More AI (class mgt, marking, sourcing materials) = more teacher/student building relationships, mentorship, and storytelling.
My general rule for all things AI is that advances will happen faster than people think but its disruption on industry/professions will take longer than people think.
The teaching profession will likely be the last profession to change as a result of AI. Unions, governments, administrative churn will create resistance to the benefits of AI by focusing on the negatives and not the positives (Who really likes marking? Why does it take so long to get student's feedback? Why are we not using the data created by tests to make learning better/faster/more efficient?)
Nice opinion. I'm on the same page with you. Even if AI gets improved, teachers won't disappear. But the method of learning might be changed - Better or worse way -
As for me, there is a financial reason why I use AI more. If I had more money, I would have more online lessons with my private teacher. But my salary is so bad. For me, it is still strange to speak to my phone. I would rather have a conversation with a "real" English teacher 😊
We are in the same boat! How much your salary and where do you live?
@@DAVID1986. I live in Europe, in Hungary and my salary is around net 830 Euro. 😔 I work as a secretary. And you? Where do you live?
@@angelikasipos5495 I am surprised 830 euros in europ !!! I am Algerian work as engineer my salary about 800 euro!
Similarly, I might end up as an unemployed engineer too. What should I do now?
😂😂😂😂 "aí took my job, as em English teacher..... And now I live here" 😅😅😅😅
Just great!
The shift from gas lamplighters to electricians and horse-drawn carriage roles to automotive jobs shows how old professions were replaced by new ones adapted to emerging technologies. But with AI assistants potentially taking over language teaching, we may face a different scenario. Language teachers could be replaced without a new wave of jobs. While it seems logical to think we’d need more programmers for AI, that assumption is misleading; modern AI is increasingly self-programming and self-improving. This could mark a unique turning point where technology doesn’t spark an equivalent wave of new employment, leaving fewer opportunities to fill as AI takes over.
Note: by the way, I suck in English and this message was written by ChatGPT 😂
No matter how AI becomes sofisticated, we still need technical support on how to use it. Teacher should become like that in future anyway. Does community college education help you to become billionare? I think AI can replace teacher. But, it does not determine your success. It all comes down to luck, determination, and choice. We have both good and bad doctors, lawyers, etc We need to have good AI tech support for English education as well.
Reality is going to be stranger than science fiction.
Cool video. Thanks for sharing.
Your name isn’t Cloud but Luke ?
Correct
@@CloudEnglish don't tell your second name is not English either..?
@@anatoli4ok148 Sooo....you thought that my name was actually "Cloud English"?
😂
Luke Priddy! you have got a new name. It shows you need to introduce yourself properly for the upcoming audiences in each and every posts.
well it won't replace English teacher because language itself has culture, it's not about the translation.
Now you can switch to youtube. Because the TH-cam company has not used AI to fulfill the content in it
Too bad advanced voice is not in Europe, where people need it even more (for English that is, pronunciation specificly). Sorry about you job man.
😅
@@CloudEnglish hhh now they make you lose your job before 2030
Luke, don’t worry. I’ll find you a job in California.
I’m starting to think, based on the comments, people think I actually lost my job.
@@CloudEnglish😂😂