Chaos in the Pendulum

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 6 ก.พ. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 18

  • @ewjh_26
    @ewjh_26 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Amazing video, glad the algorithm pushed this to me and I hope it does for many others too

  • @manon_4937
    @manon_4937 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Hello ! I am searching for a subject for an experiment ill have to show in front of a jury, and for now i appear to be choosing this one. Thanks for this amazing source of knowledge !

    • @Zenzicubic
      @Zenzicubic  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      What do you mean by a jury?? Do you mean judges in a science fair? I'm glad you liked it and that you learned something! Keep me posted, I'm curious whether your pendulum wins LOL!

  • @chero03
    @chero03 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    this was fire

  • @ophello
    @ophello 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    What parameters are you changing to generate the “growing” fractals? Gravity increase?

    • @Zenzicubic
      @Zenzicubic  2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I'm playing with the time that I wait before I look at the magnet's position. I have code in the description if you want to look.

  • @Dyslexic-Artist-Theory-on-Time
    @Dyslexic-Artist-Theory-on-Time 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The Pendulum seems to speed up and slow down based on Kepler second law of planetary motion! As it moves along it path, it sweeps out equal area segments in an equal time.

    • @Zenzicubic
      @Zenzicubic  8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I can see why that might make sense...the equations for gravitational force and electrostatic force (or magnetic force) are both inverse-square laws.

  • @Science1234-r6f
    @Science1234-r6f 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    physics is love

  • @koukouzee2923
    @koukouzee2923 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I went from Eww physics to damn physics ! To physics? Too fast

    • @Zenzicubic
      @Zenzicubic  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks, glad you like it. Will try to keep that in mind for next time.

  • @Wasp9513
    @Wasp9513 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The same can be done with four gravitational potentials.

    • @Zenzicubic
      @Zenzicubic  ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah, that figures. Both are just inverse square laws...

  • @youerny
    @youerny 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Bravo, very nice video. I would like so much collaborate

    • @Zenzicubic
      @Zenzicubic  8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you!

  • @user255
    @user255 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    You might be interested in this paper (it is peer-reviewed despite of DOI for arXiv):
    DOI: /10.48550/arXiv.chao-dyn/9610009
    It's long since I read it and there was some nice visual demonstration (by different author?) for this, but I can't find it anymore. You can find a lot more about the topic with googling "exactly solvable chaos". Just in case you didn't know about it. I remember that I did find it quite surprising.

    • @Zenzicubic
      @Zenzicubic  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      That's an interesting idea...I'm a bit surprised that sort of thing could exist. Thanks for watching!