Singularities may or may not be naked, but your brain should definitely not be. Cover it with the veil of knowledge by going to brilliant.org/Sciencephile/ to get a 30-day free trial + the first 200 people will get 20% off their annual subscription.
So if we made a spaceship out of indestructible rotisserie chicken, then could we study a black hole up close without fear of getting sucked into the singularity?
@@TWIXTIMA0And those videos are how old exactly? It may have been debunked by then, disproven, replaced or bettered than it was when the video was released.
Oh my god just think of the children; we must ban these naked singularities otherwise they will be damaged psychologically. Calling Ron desantis now perhaps he can get them banned.
9:30 there's your key. You do not have to worry about objects interacting with the singularity or even the event horizon because by the time they get there, they're reduced to red-shifted photons, which then add infinitesimally to the event horizon's radius and angular momentum, or are shot off as radiation.
Sciencephile among all of the learning channels out there, this channel has to be one of the best learning channels I can learn new stuff from when I'm bored
I like the string-theory description of a black hole. I don't think the infinite density representation is based on reality, it's just how general relativity describes it
Some other curiosities about black holes and singularities: A spinning black hole has a ring shaped singularity (also called ringularity) that is a 1-d torus of radius 0 (no, mathematically it is not a point) and if you go through it you can travel back in time When you do the calculation for emission of hawking radiation of a charged BH you see that it preferentially emits particles with the same signal charge of the black hole, so that's a reason for them to remain neutral
Though nobody really knows what lies beyond event horizon of the black hole. Some model suggest that the "singularity" isn't represent as a physical point. Rather is an inevitable future as time & space inside "switch roles". Could think about a matter, as it fallen into the event horizon and goes into singularity. From the outside prespective it's goes slower until it appears to be " frozen" in time, while from the matter perspective the time seems normal but time in the outside goes faster beyond imagination. And the matter itself never be able to reach singularity no matter how long it goes.
@@haikalmiftah2529lack holes evaporate over time,and the time is slowed for them so we see them staying as an object for long time but from its own perspective shouldn't it fully "explode" into hawking radiation the same instant it becomes a singularity? much like we can see light travel but from a photon perspective it started and ended its path in the same moment? I always wondered that
@@Andrea-wr5wd So that means everything a black hole consumes (except for escaped photons) will show up as plattered atoms on a spherical metal core when the universe experiences heat death?
I had been waiting maybe a couple of years for spacetime to do more about this topic Getting a video of this quality and explained in such simple terms is a blessing
i usually don’t comment on videos but i wanted to tell you that i literally love you😭like i BINGE your videos because sometimes they’re all my brain wants to watch. i’ll find myself doing something random and have a huge existential crisis because of your content (sounds bad when wording it out but it’s a good thing). TLDR, thank you for the content and keep it up
if spinning the black hole is how you create a naked singularity, and the problem is that you cant spin a black hole, then why not get a star about to collapse into a black hole, and spin it up as fast as possible, and THEN collapsing it? i suppose this would work if it wasnt for the fact that the speed required for the star would be so great that it would fly everywhere
If the problem is things escaping and being flung out before it enters the black hole. I say to try rotating things once they’re past the event horizon.
I absolutely love your videos! You manage to dive into the topic, shooting your jokes and unique style, making it feel so relaxed and enjoyable without overwhelming me
Man this channel had a huge glow up ngl. I remember how simple it used to look. Now there's so much animation, better voice and stuff. Make 1 million subscribers a special where you don't mention black holes at all lmao
AI's somehow compel us to do things humans couldn't. Like I answered an AI telemarketing insurance call. It asked me if I could get a better rate would I be willing to switch agencies. I love my insurance company and have paid in full for the year, but I found myself saying yes to an agent contacting me. 🙄 Maybe AI world domination will just be it telling humans to walk off a cliff like lemmings. "Would you like to walk off this cliff and plunge to your death? Yes!"
Sciencephile, your videos are amazing. They have interesting facts and knowledge about reality and life while keeping funny and comedic parts making it overall a super enjoyable experience. Hope this channel lasts as long as a Black Hole which would be 10^100 years. P.S. Darth Vader
Would be interesting and kind of funny, imo, if we found out the center of a black hole was just basically a neutron star, but even denser. No singularity, no hole in our universe, nothing that special. Just a way more dense neuron star. And we wouldn't even know about this unless we do ever find a naked singularity. Because there is still a swarzchild radius we couldn't see or even detect anything past.
"[...] Hence, if we can deorbit a rapidly spinning chicken around a curb Black Hole, it may be possible to cook it with gravitational forces, the pinnacle of the art of rotisserie chicken." This is why I love this channel
what if the singularity actually has a defined volume, because as gravity crushes everything in, the pressure from all the mass and "particles" trying to escape reaches an equilibrium, leaving a sort of stable state. that assumes that they mostly follow the Pauli exclusion principle. I'm sure this has been thought of before i just cant find it anywhere and I've been thinking about it.
Every black hole creates a new universe. And every universe creates more black holes. The universes that create the most black holes get to reproduce more. This is the evolution of the multiverse.
what speaks against the idea of placing 2 black holes with significantly more gravitaional pull on opposite sides in equivalent distance to an rotating blackhole ? should that not be able to "split" the ringularity until it has not enough mass left to still have an event horizon thus exposing the leftovers of its singularity?
You can’t pull apart a singularity like that. Even if the 2 black holes are significantly more massive, the singularity of the rotating black hole is closer to itself and thus exerts a much stronger gravitational pull on itself than the 2 surrounding black holes.
The event horizon is just a region of space where escape velocity is c. Adding MORE gravitational curvature either side of a black hole does not cancel the field strength(curvature). It would strengthen it. The event horizon would actually expand.
thanks for explaining how it cant happen, but i gotta say for a solid minute after you spun the event horizon away, i felt like a kid learning about black holes for the first time.
I love this channel and the effort you go through to put out fun yet informative content. I always get a chuckle and everything is explained in simple and clear enough terms for my zooted out brain to still understand what is going on.
Singularities may or may not be naked, but your brain should definitely not be. Cover it with the veil of knowledge by going to brilliant.org/Sciencephile/ to get a 30-day free trial + the first 200 people will get 20% off their annual subscription.
First to reply
ballin
Mey bran is noked
I aim to freeze🧊🧊❄❄🥶🥶❄❄🥶🥶❄❄🧊🧊🧊🧊
call me mortal again. I am going to find your location in next 20 years. then you will pay the price
You can really tell that the editing has gotten better. Great job sciencephile
Hes not in a black void now. Improvement
The AI is getting better 😂
Machine-Learning
The skynet is always improving after all
Skynet is here to help but they can’t do that if the video is boring
So if we made a spaceship out of indestructible rotisserie chicken, then could we study a black hole up close without fear of getting sucked into the singularity?
I wonder if I could do it with my chickens.
I will update you if it works.
🐥🐥
Update: they are dead 💀💀
@@thatguygrimmrest in peace
@@thatguygrimm lol
@@thatguygrimm F
@@thatguygrimm it's because they are babies. You have to use chicken 🐔 🐔
I really appreciate more visual gags in showcasing scientific principles in this video, it eally brings a real Sciencephile touch
The naked object of great attraction joke hit too hard tho
He's inching closer to Max0r editing 😈
buff chicken
Sciencephile has a great talent when it comes magically giving you extra brain cells
why do i see you everywhere..
@@lovelylady2787”If you see someone everywhere, that means you’re also everywhere.”
you are in every comment section on every channel everywhere yet your comments dont seem like bot comments.
PLEASE STOP
this guy is chosen one by TH-cam to succeed Justin Y
You are the next Justin Y
At this point i'd beilieve everything this AI says.
thats all they want (i believe too)
Well, he got a few facts wrong.
Good >:)
Even if it told you you could spell?
🤔
...and that's *after* you edited your comment.
🙄
🍄
@@TWIXTIMA0And those videos are how old exactly? It may have been debunked by then, disproven, replaced or bettered than it was when the video was released.
After couple of years without naked singularities in my life I don’t even know if I believe in their existence or not
You'd believe them, same as you do for naked women on the internet.
hol up
no bitches?
Oh my god just think of the children; we must ban these naked singularities otherwise they will be damaged psychologically. Calling Ron desantis now perhaps he can get them banned.
Like me believing women are not real, never saw them naked! Who knows what actually are them?
9:30 there's your key. You do not have to worry about objects interacting with the singularity or even the event horizon because by the time they get there, they're reduced to red-shifted photons, which then add infinitesimally to the event horizon's radius and angular momentum, or are shot off as radiation.
How long would that take for us, outside observers?
A long time in a universal scale, cuz time slows down near a black hole
@@payhemsehtif youre outside the event horizon, infinitely long.
@@bibsp3556Nope because light would expand so there would be no longevity for an observer
@alive2583 yeah that's true, but it's because it takes an infinite time to get there.
I haven’t watched your videos in awhile and you haven’t changed. Your videos and their humor is perfect
same
I never thought I would ever see an image of a blushing blackhole
Rule 34 is a wonderful conjecture: For all x, there exists porn of x.
And so *cute*
@@word6344 if you look up black hole on there you'll just get a bunch of characters either related to or next to black holes
Remember Blackhole-chan?
@jelly4frog498 rule 34
If it exists, theres porn of it.
Also next time, use Tor..
and/or a VPN
your ISP is watching.
But are there Hot Singularities in my Area?
Yes they are 5km away from you
@sussexisalbania8959 why is the sky warped
"Single black holes in your area 1,560 light years away! Click now!"
@@Ihavenoclue630 single venus in your area, click now
@@Ihavenoclue630 *CLICK CLICK CLICK CLICK*
-person who watches bfb/tpot
Thanks!
Kinda scary how good the AI is getting at editing
HE CAN ALSO MAKE SPONSORS WHILE WE ARE SITTING
people tryna see naked singularities is like people tryna see a naked woman.
"theoretical physicists will likely never behold a naked object of great attraction outside of simulations"
wow ok
That was a slick burn 💀💀💀
Sciencephile among all of the learning channels out there, this channel has to be one of the best learning channels I can learn new stuff from when I'm bored
I like the string-theory description of a black hole. I don't think the infinite density representation is based on reality, it's just how general relativity describes it
You did the black hole dirty in that thumbnail bruu 💀
He got em' naked twice
you may not know that but these naked singularities suck infinitly good
@@DeezNuts-kl2tewoah there….
Some other curiosities about black holes and singularities:
A spinning black hole has a ring shaped singularity (also called ringularity) that is a 1-d torus of radius 0 (no, mathematically it is not a point) and if you go through it you can travel back in time
When you do the calculation for emission of hawking radiation of a charged BH you see that it preferentially emits particles with the same signal charge of the black hole, so that's a reason for them to remain neutral
Though nobody really knows what lies beyond event horizon of the black hole. Some model suggest that the "singularity" isn't represent as a physical point. Rather is an inevitable future as time & space inside "switch roles".
Could think about a matter, as it fallen into the event horizon and goes into singularity. From the outside prespective it's goes slower until it appears to be " frozen" in time, while from the matter perspective the time seems normal but time in the outside goes faster beyond imagination. And the matter itself never be able to reach singularity no matter how long it goes.
@@haikalmiftah2529lack holes evaporate over time,and the time is slowed for them
so we see them staying as an object for long time but from its own perspective shouldn't it fully "explode" into hawking radiation the same instant it becomes a singularity?
much like we can see light travel but from a photon perspective it started and ended its path in the same moment?
I always wondered that
@@Andrea-wr5wd So that means everything a black hole consumes (except for escaped photons) will show up as plattered atoms on a spherical metal core when the universe experiences heat death?
I had been waiting maybe a couple of years for spacetime to do more about this topic
Getting a video of this quality and explained in such simple terms is a blessing
Im here to see naked singularities and im not disappointed
i usually don’t comment on videos but i wanted to tell you that i literally love you😭like i BINGE your videos because sometimes they’re all my brain wants to watch. i’ll find myself doing something random and have a huge existential crisis because of your content (sounds bad when wording it out but it’s a good thing). TLDR, thank you for the content and keep it up
Jack wang
I hate it when I accidentally sees singularity naked. It makes me aro
that is a VERY round chicken
The thumbnail 💀
Just clicked because of it
@@Imabrazillianman WHAATTTT
This videos is amazing, the editing, the jokes, i love it
the rotisserie chicken joke was the first time I clapped at my television screen like a boomer.
epic setup and delivery
if spinning the black hole is how you create a naked singularity, and the problem is that you cant spin a black hole, then why not get a star about to collapse into a black hole, and spin it up as fast as possible, and THEN collapsing it? i suppose this would work if it wasnt for the fact that the speed required for the star would be so great that it would fly everywhere
Yes as you said, it will prevent the formation of the singularity itself.
If the problem is things escaping and being flung out before it enters the black hole. I say to try rotating things once they’re past the event horizon.
@@jksupergamer bruh...
@@kalyanbratachandra yeah
@@jksupergamer you were kidding right?
I love how this can both be educational and comedic at the same time
love it!!
I absolutely love your videos! You manage to dive into the topic, shooting your jokes and unique style, making it feel so relaxed and enjoyable without overwhelming me
Naked Singularities are as real and dissapointing as finding out that a hot single mother 5 miles away from you isnt real.
honestly you were the reason i made a presentation about black holes, i love watching these vids while eating, you honestly remind me of young shledon
Bro had fun while making the thumbnail
Man this channel had a huge glow up ngl. I remember how simple it used to look. Now there's so much animation, better voice and stuff.
Make 1 million subscribers a special where you don't mention black holes at all lmao
nobody's talking about how at 8:18, the meteor turned red as it fell into the black hole (as it would irl)
Love the humor of this channel.
This gave a new meaning to "Sciencephile"
we can't have you know the truth...
Say an last goodbye to your loved one
This is the only text to speech channel I respect
Naked Singularity? Smash.
Sciencephile upload, days been blessed
I learned more about the universe by an ai than with people trained to teach me
Ayo, the edit quality has gone up considerably
Excellent stuff as always, boss
Brilliant: holds Information
TON 618:
The channels editing has become way better! KEEP IT UP YOU EVER LEARNING AI
Love the Runescape burnt meat image at 6:50 :)
This guy has always been my source for knowledge and I love it.
Honestly, this AI could teach me literally anything and I'd still listen.
AI's somehow compel us to do things humans couldn't. Like I answered an AI telemarketing insurance call. It asked me if I could get a better rate would I be willing to switch agencies. I love my insurance company and have paid in full for the year, but I found myself saying yes to an agent contacting me. 🙄 Maybe AI world domination will just be it telling humans to walk off a cliff like lemmings. "Would you like to walk off this cliff and plunge to your death? Yes!"
I cant remember ever reading or hearing about black holes without the phrasing "not EVEN light" can escape it attached to it somehow
The thumbnail💀
This goofy AI definitely knew what it was doing when it was creating the thumbnail.
5:16 if naked singularity is naked. WHY DID YOU ADD CLOTHES TO NAKED SINGULARITY THAT MOMENT!?
are you saying you wanna see naked ash?? excuse me????
wait thats not ash is it
credits to the cameraman for the black hole pictures
Sciencephile, your videos are amazing. They have interesting facts and knowledge about reality and life while keeping funny and comedic parts making it overall a super enjoyable experience.
Hope this channel lasts as long as a Black Hole which would be 10^100 years.
P.S.
Darth Vader
The editing in these videos get better and better!
Kep it upp!
Would be interesting and kind of funny, imo, if we found out the center of a black hole was just basically a neutron star, but even denser. No singularity, no hole in our universe, nothing that special. Just a way more dense neuron star.
And we wouldn't even know about this unless we do ever find a naked singularity. Because there is still a swarzchild radius we couldn't see or even detect anything past.
3:40 "Guys inside there is one piece one piece one piece"
"when you encounter infinities using physical formulas, usually something went wro...."
(wifi failed)
perfect timing lol
You must change the title now!!! You’ve given the artists ideas!
Why is the thumbnail like that 💀
I can't believe sciencephile just made me simp for black holes
Before I’m actually in this video
Im gonna guess an exposed singularity
"[...] Hence, if we can deorbit a rapidly spinning chicken around a curb Black Hole, it may be possible to cook it with gravitational forces, the pinnacle of the art of rotisserie chicken."
This is why I love this channel
i felt that line as a worker at Boston Market in my younger years
As someone who watches the mighty AI and PBS Spacetime, I appreciated that little jab.
I love the attention to detail, like how every time anything would fall into a black hole it'd become red-shifted.
8:48 take that line out of context and say that to someone you know and see how they react.
ok
The editing is just next level so good
Hey! I love ur videos bro!!
0:56 that detail turning red
that nakes singularity is gonna make me act up
I have the strangest idea in the world's history, and nobody knows what it is.
@@TheBuilderPro2025?
@@Imabrazillianman It's about the comment that is above my first one. Guess.
The only AI we can trust (definitely without any repercussions)
Learning about black holes is oddly relaxing.
Naked singularities? Oh hell nah, knowing mankind that shit will become a kink very fast
Shit we gon have a onlysingularities
Too bad you can't do it without dying. We need a VR sim-
I SAID TOO MUCH!
At this point he should be called Blackholephile the AI
YO NEW SCIENCEPHILE VIDEO!!!!!!!!! YEAH!!!!!!!!!!!
what if the singularity actually has a defined volume, because as gravity crushes everything in, the pressure from all the mass and "particles" trying to escape reaches an equilibrium, leaving a sort of stable state. that assumes that they mostly follow the Pauli exclusion principle. I'm sure this has been thought of before i just cant find it anywhere and I've been thinking about it.
Every black hole creates a new universe. And every universe creates more black holes. The universes that create the most black holes get to reproduce more.
This is the evolution of the multiverse.
This isn't scientific. It's philosophical. There is no way to prove parallel universes.
3:11 yooo thats my grand dad
"we inch closer to finding the true face of reallity, with all its monsters hidden behind event horizons and flesh bodies"
what speaks against the idea of placing 2 black holes with significantly more gravitaional pull on opposite sides in equivalent distance to an rotating blackhole ? should that not be able to "split" the ringularity until it has not enough mass left to still have an event horizon thus exposing the leftovers of its singularity?
You can’t pull apart a singularity like that. Even if the 2 black holes are significantly more massive, the singularity of the rotating black hole is closer to itself and thus exerts a much stronger gravitational pull on itself than the 2 surrounding black holes.
The event horizon is just a region of space where escape velocity is c.
Adding MORE gravitational curvature either side of a black hole does not cancel the field strength(curvature). It would strengthen it.
The event horizon would actually expand.
Thank you Sciencephile (the AI) for making me (a mortal) to show an expression of "laugh"
The thumbnail 💀💀💀
Smash, next question
I want someone to make an ad that says "Naked singularities in your area!"
In the first place. Why will Sciencephile would want to look at a nak3d singularity?
The title maked me roll to andromeda
Sciencephile needs to talk about a theory that black holes can eject stuff
already done. called hawking radiation
@@tjelol The OTHER stuff Just like how they SUCK things.
what if black holes dissolve everything that gets too close into particles and even smaller
thanks for explaining how it cant happen, but i gotta say for a solid minute after you spun the event horizon away, i felt like a kid learning about black holes for the first time.
I love this channel and the effort you go through to put out fun yet informative content.
I always get a chuckle and everything is explained in simple and clear enough terms for my zooted out brain to still understand what is going on.
Came for the thumbnail, stayed for knowledge.
00:30
can someone tell me what the original clip is
Black mesa 8k rtx on
I'm a simple man, I see chickens used to explain complex physics, i subscribe 😌
Praise the ai overlord for he has blessed us with another video
clicked for the thumbnail-
Imagine a black hole just saying uwu and it's gravitational field makes the light bend so it appears like cat ears 💀
Then im banging it even if it’s a billion times my size
you gave me ideas
Keep doing your job my son sciencephile
"Theoretical Physicists will likely never behold a naked object of great attraction" 💀
in context: ok weird way to put it
out of context: AYOOO-
I feel like a dumb Garry's Mod character being graced with the education of an AI that has more patience than a saint.
The re-entry of the cow into Earth’s atmosphere is hysterical!!!
Thank you Sciencphile for making learning fun! #skynet2024 🤣
nah that thumbnail 😭
One thing I know for sure after learning a things about our universe is that scientists suck at naming things
Physicists at least. Biologists seem to really like putting some variation of "phallus" in scientific names for organisms.
uranus☠️👽
If you totally locked 2 black holes, and had them spiral closer to each other at a slow enough speed, wouldn’t that add rotational velocity to them?