I take Step 2 this week and I think I just learned more biostats in 26 minutes than I did in 3 months worth of Uworld problems. Not all heroes wear capes. 💥
In last question about the Odss Ratio, the answer should be (60/200)/ (40/160), why is it option C? And in the question about the RR about the prostate cancer The formula you wrote is (a/a+b)/ (c/c+d) 15:43 and because "first on top" it goes backwards, (c/c+d)/(a/a+b), but still, the process you followed was (b/b+d)/ (a/a+c)... im confused
The genius of your videos is that they offer something very different. Its very hard to establish yourself nowadays teaching on the Internet. The competition is simply not fair. Your videos however target a part of the material that most larger comapnies don't cover too well (not in a practical way at least). Very grateful for your work. My CK is tomorrow 🙏🙏
Before watching Dr Neil's videos I felt like an absolute mess when faced with a Biostats Q and now it seems too easy it's unbelievable! My only regret is that I didn't find these videos earlier as my Step 3 is 1 week from today but even so they were more helpful than a whole 2 weeks of studying Biostats so thank you so much Dr Neil and God Bless you! I am literally going to recommend this channel to everyone I know! Good luck everyone 🙏
In the last question the divided one number (60) by one number (200) over one number (40) divided by 2 numbers (40+160) ie (A/B)/(C/C+D) isn't the OR supposed to be (AxD)/(CxB) which would be answer choice A?
For the Odds Ratio question, I believe the answer should be (60/40)/(200/160). Odds Ratios (a/c)/(b/d) represent the odds of exposure among cases (a/c) vs odds of exposure among controls (b/d). In this problem, being old is represented as the exposure (a,b) and the case is represented as a low score (c,d).
Just to add a little to this. His equation/answer was just written incorrectly. it should have been "(60/200)/(40/160)" as opposed to "(60/200)/(40)/(40+160)". Rearranging the fraction, as you did (i.e., (a/b)/(c/d) rearranged to (a/c)/(b/d)) yields the exact same answer (OR=1.2)
Thank you for your help Dr Neil! Just one question. On 22:10 you said it is a case control study. I think it is a retrospective cohort since we can look at low USMLE scores as a disease. So if we have two groups, one with a risk factor for low score (being older) and one without the risk (being younger) and we look retrospectively to see if they had low scores ('a disease') then I would consider it a cohort study. It is similar to observing if smokers and non-smokers developed COPD or SCLC. If it was a case control, we would have a group with low scores (a disease) and a group without low scores (no disease) and then we would look if they were exposed to a risk factor such as an old age. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
That is what the table indicates, a group of low score vs a group with no low score and they're studying how many people were older than 50 in both groups and what are the odds of you getting a low score if you're older then 50. Note the text in the question gives incomplete information, the table explained it better.
Sir in the Question explained from 21:08 to 22:40 they have grouped the students on the basis of independent variables(age) so this should be a Cohort study not a case control and hence the next Question should ask about Relative risk not odds ratio bye the way you are great sir thank you
Hi Dr. Neil just wanted to thank you once again for all of your amazing videos and excellent advice. Your biostat videos helped me immensely when preparing for Step 3 and now I'm matched at my #1 choice and about to begin residency July 1st! You are the best of the TH-cam medical educational video instructors.
In the last set of question of finding an odd's ratio, it should have been {60/200}/{40/160} .. isnt the answer supposed to be this instead of the one which u have ticked,, ?? it says {60/200}/ { 40 / (40+160) } .. is it typing error ?
i remember watching the original vids a few years ago and thinking you were an attending. wild that you were just beginning residency at the time; so impressive! thanks for all the hard work you do!
i really appreciate your work Dr.Neil, biostatistics was my nightmare before watching your videos. Now i can approach with a confidence to the questions thanks to you.
Mean 210, STD 15, how many above 240 = 2.5% since 2 STD = 95% and 5% outside of those 2 STD. Means above is 5% / 2 = 2.5% because the other 2.5% is BELOW.
Thank you so much for your incredible effort! Would you please give me a simple explanation why the study in min 21:11 is not cohort ? We started with 2 groups without knowing what the results were, then went retrospectively in order to know the results. Thanks again
Hello, in the last question, the answer choice C is 40 over 40+160, however, according to your explanation, it should be 40 over 160 only, right? Is the question wrong or something?
" learn this, learn that, understand this, memorize that, memorize this, learn this, make sure to know this, review this, review that make sure to know that, dont forget this, dont forget that" - ( Medschool & usmle in a nutshell )
thank you so much for that helpfully . I HAVE A QUATION: if they said ; increase healthy people what happen? is it standard error increased but upper interval increase and lower interval decrease ? anyway thank you so much
Thanks again for such good content! I took Step 2 this morning and listened to this review again on my way to the exam site, it really helped me with a few questions! Also, the Drug Ad video was invaluable! Do you have anything planned for Step 3?
once again i'm here for the bestestttttt biostats teacher ever for my step 2 CK. done with step1, highly recomment Randy Neil, MD. i literally can't stress it enough how important it is to watch and understand his videos.
Neelum, Start from scratch... change the mindset... Take your weakest topic and start from there... LEARN IT as though I was going to have you teach it LIVE without using notes... Don't move on from the topic until you can do that...
Hello Dr. MCNeil, wanted to thank you for you step 1 videos , they helped me pass ! I also wanted to also to kindly ask you if you could please make Step 2 Ck videos, you are a pioneer in explanatng medical concepts. I would really really appreciate any step 2 content . I recently took my step 2 ck and failed in part because I did not study enough,i did my step 2 without passing a single NBME practice form, dumb I know but I will put more on my part this 2nd time . Dr.could you please orient me on any study materials or videos ? Thank you, and God bless
@@RandyNeilMD My exam is in about 4 months Already done with a first pass In FA, about 50%in UW... but I STILL FEEL LIKE I DON’T HAVE MANY TIME because I’d like to do 2 more passes in FA, 3 passes in total with UW. I’m wondering if I have to follow this plan OR edit it and include pathoma videos and/or book in it... I’d like to get your advices, please. Or, any one who already take step 1🙏🏾 Ps: sorry if my English is terrible😊
Mille merci Dr Neil ! Thank you so much! I really struggled with biostats, your teaching skills made it so easy to look at these questions with a calm mind and more confidence!
Thank you Dr. Neil. I really appreciate you getting back to me. The sole reason I got through Step-1 Biostats (recently) was because of your videos. Looking forward to rewatching and reviewing them again for Step-2. Pls add some more Step-2CK materials (various topics) if you have the chance. Thank you.
am I tripping or at 24:00 isn't C still incorrect because the second half of the question includes 40 in the denominator? shouldn't it be (40/160) instead of (40/(40+160)) ? thank you for your videos they are incredibly helpful!
Dr. Neil, Thank you so much for your amazing videos. I had a question- isn't PPV related to Specificity and NPV related to Sensitivity? I mean if specificity increases ,then PPV increases and vice versa and if Sensitivity increases then NPV does and vice versa.But, if we have to calculate PPV, we use Sensitivity values(top values) and for NPV Specificity values(bottom). So, how come PPV related to specificity and NPV to Sensitivity?
For the problem at 13:48, why don't we consider the true positives and true negatives? Because to me, every number is getting smaller, TN/TP/FN/FP. So just logistically, I would have said nothing changes. Because the numerator got small as the denominator got small as well.
In the question about the USMLE scores isn't it supposed to be a cross sectional type? and aren't the answer choices supposed to be test names in the first place? (such as t-test, ANOVA, Chi-square...) --> if so it would be a Chi-square test I assume, right?
Hi Dr. Neil! Quick clarifying question: in a previous video you stated that if the confidence interval crosses 1, it is not significant. However in this video, you said if it crosses 0 it is not significant. Are both true?
the person who gave you a thumbs down is probably mad cause they didnt find this video before their test
Orlando, Ha.. It's ok. I work in Psychiatry... Dislikes are just part of the process.
Great review video. Thank you so much Dr. Neil. The BEST Behavior Science & Biostatistics Channel
Princess, You definitely make me feel good about what we are doing... Thank you.
Thank you for this.
Dr Neil, any chance of future videos on interviews tips and tricks?
RJ, I'm always trying to incorporate some tips and tricks... Thank you for the reminder...
thank you so much
You are most welcome.
Thanks!
What’s difference between odds and relative risk ???
I take Step 2 this week and I think I just learned more biostats in 26 minutes than I did in 3 months worth of Uworld problems. Not all heroes wear capes. 💥
omg me too and im 4 weeks away goodluck!!!!
Glad it was worth the time... Keep me posted on your progress.
Every single video is a gift, literally! Thank you Dr. Neil. I'm always excited to get notifications from your channel!
Natia, I appreciate the nice comment. Keep studying HARD!!
Exactly!!👌👌God bless him🤲🏻
In last question about the Odss Ratio, the answer should be (60/200)/ (40/160), why is it option C?
And in the question about the RR about the prostate cancer
The formula you wrote is (a/a+b)/ (c/c+d) 15:43 and because "first on top" it goes backwards, (c/c+d)/(a/a+b), but still, the process you followed was (b/b+d)/ (a/a+c)... im confused
Pretty sure in the last question it's a mistake!
The genius of your videos is that they offer something very different. Its very hard to establish yourself nowadays teaching on the Internet. The competition is simply not fair. Your videos however target a part of the material that most larger comapnies don't cover too well (not in a practical way at least).
Very grateful for your work. My CK is tomorrow 🙏🙏
Thank you for taking time to leave a thoughtful comment. Sincerely appreciated. I hoe you CRUSHED CK!!
Before watching Dr Neil's videos I felt like an absolute mess when faced with a Biostats Q and now it seems too easy it's unbelievable! My only regret is that I didn't find these videos earlier as my Step 3 is 1 week from today but even so they were more helpful than a whole 2 weeks of studying Biostats so thank you so much Dr Neil and God Bless you! I am literally going to recommend this channel to everyone I know! Good luck everyone 🙏
Mohammed, Thank you for taking time to type such a nice comment. Glad the videos have been helpful.
In the last question the divided one number (60) by one number (200) over one number (40) divided by 2 numbers (40+160)
ie (A/B)/(C/C+D)
isn't the OR supposed to be (AxD)/(CxB) which would be answer choice A?
I'll have to relook... Case control (odds ratio) 1 number over 1 number... Cohort (relative risk) 1 number over 2.
@@RandyNeilMD Yes! my point exactly. Would love to have feedback about the correct answer.
I have the same doubt too!
C. (60/200) / (40/ (40+60)) ; 1 number over 2
For the Odds Ratio question, I believe the answer should be (60/40)/(200/160).
Odds Ratios (a/c)/(b/d) represent the odds of exposure among cases (a/c) vs odds of exposure among controls (b/d). In this problem, being old is represented as the exposure (a,b) and the case is represented as a low score (c,d).
Just to add a little to this. His equation/answer was just written incorrectly. it should have been "(60/200)/(40/160)" as opposed to "(60/200)/(40)/(40+160)". Rearranging the fraction, as you did (i.e., (a/b)/(c/d) rearranged to (a/c)/(b/d)) yields the exact same answer (OR=1.2)
Thank you very much for your videos. For the Odds Ratio question, the answer C should be 60/200 / 40/160?
Preparing for anesthesiology boards, going back to your videos to review the basics of biostats! Your videos are gold!!
Glad they are still helpful... You are much closer to the finish line.
Don’t tell me they have this in boards too? So done with ethics and biostats…as if having them in USMLE wasn’t enough, they have this in boards too🥹🤨😟
Thank you for your help Dr Neil! Just one question. On 22:10 you said it is a case control study. I think it is a retrospective cohort since we can look at low USMLE scores as a disease. So if we have two groups, one with a risk factor for low score (being older) and one without the risk (being younger) and we look retrospectively to see if they had low scores ('a disease') then I would consider it a cohort study. It is similar to observing if smokers and non-smokers developed COPD or SCLC. If it was a case control, we would have a group with low scores (a disease) and a group without low scores (no disease) and then we would look if they were exposed to a risk factor such as an old age. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
I agree
Also agree
That is what the table indicates, a group of low score vs a group with no low score and they're studying how many people were older than 50 in both groups and what are the odds of you getting a low score if you're older then 50.
Note the text in the question gives incomplete information, the table explained it better.
Sir in the Question explained from 21:08 to 22:40 they have grouped the students on the basis of independent variables(age) so this should be a Cohort study not a case control and hence the next Question should ask about Relative risk not odds ratio
bye the way you are great sir thank you
Agree
Hi Dr. Neil just wanted to thank you once again for all of your amazing videos and excellent advice. Your biostat videos helped me immensely when preparing for Step 3 and now I'm matched at my #1 choice and about to begin residency July 1st! You are the best of the TH-cam medical educational video instructors.
hi thanks. in last q there should be 40/160 not 40/160+40
In the last set of question of finding an odd's ratio, it should have been {60/200}/{40/160} .. isnt the answer supposed to be this instead of the one which u have ticked,, ?? it says {60/200}/ { 40 / (40+160) } .. is it typing error ?
I just noticed that too and agree with you Think it was an error in his video!
Is truly have no disease = no disease( FP +TN) Or TN only. That confused me in one of the questions.Please explain Dr. Neil. Thanks for your help!
A little hard to understand in typed words...
i remember watching the original vids a few years ago and thinking you were an attending. wild that you were just beginning residency at the time; so impressive! thanks for all the hard work you do!
Time flies... Glad videos were/are helpful...
i really appreciate your work Dr.Neil, biostatistics was my nightmare before watching your videos. Now i can approach with a confidence to the questions thanks to you.
Okan, That is very good to hear... CONFIDENCE IS KEY!!
Taking STEP tomorrow morning, so grateful for this video!
Did you survive?
Mean 210, STD 15, how many above 240 = 2.5% since 2 STD = 95% and 5% outside of those 2 STD. Means above is 5% / 2 = 2.5% because the other 2.5% is BELOW.
Thank you so much for your incredible effort!
Would you please give me a simple explanation why the study in min 21:11 is not cohort ? We started with 2 groups without knowing what the results were, then went retrospectively in order to know the results.
Thanks again
Hello, in the last question, the answer choice C is 40 over 40+160, however, according to your explanation, it should be 40 over 160 only, right? Is the question wrong or something?
" learn this, learn that, understand this, memorize that, memorize this, learn this, make sure to know this, review this, review that make sure to know that, dont forget this, dont forget that" -
( Medschool & usmle in a nutshell )
Don't forget to RETAIN everything. He who RETAINS the most WINS.
@@RandyNeilMD how to retain is the question? How to best retain?
Question about the question at 24 minutes. Why for the Odd ratio answer is the denominator 40/(40+160) should it not just be 40/160?
thank you so much for that helpfully . I HAVE A QUATION: if they said ; increase healthy people what happen? is it standard error increased but upper interval increase and lower interval decrease ? anyway thank you so much
@24:35 the odds ratio answer should be ((60/200)/(40/160)) just a negligible error on the paper
CAN NEVER GET ENOUGH OF BIOSTATS REVIEW LOL...GOD BLESS AND THANK YOU !!
Dr. Insitu, Glad it has been helpful...!!
Sir u r the best when it comes to biostats and ethics…this channel has all the credits for clearing biostats and ethics in usmle step 1 & 2😍😍😍😍
Thank you Kalpana. I'm hoping we are removing the fear for those topics...
I am a Psychiatry trainee and I have to say your explanation and drawings are spot on. Kudos to you.
what video has the initial specifications of how to approach sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV like in the question at the 5:40 mark?
Very good video - please look at the answer choices for the last question. The correct answer wasn’t there.
Hello, how do we send you biostat question we need help with? There's no place to send you message.
Thanks again for such good content! I took Step 2 this morning and listened to this review again on my way to the exam site, it really helped me with a few questions! Also, the Drug Ad video was invaluable! Do you have anything planned for Step 3?
Glad it was helpful. The biostats will cary over to STEP3...it's roughly all the same. Maybe an additional drug ad...
thank you so much,i dont know how to stress it out!!! ,you are ...!!(no word ,really NO WORD can describe you),GOD bless you.
Thank you Mary... Keep me posted on your progress!!
You are biostat CHEIFFFF!!! Real hero’s don’t wear capes. They make biostatistics easy
Appreciate the kind comment.
Your biostats videos are literally a godsend. I can't thank you enough.
Thank you for kind words.
@24:29 Answer C should not be 60/200 divided by 40/160?
Thanks Dr. Neil
DDoM, You are most welcome.
You are always so calm. I am going through your videos and noticing how peaceful he seems❤❤
Great review Dr. Neil! Can you do a similar quick review for Psych.. That'll be extremely helpful.
Syed, Quick review for Psych should be easy...
Got my ADAT in 2 days. You've got my stats covered. Thank you and god bless!
Hope it went well... Please keep me posted.
Just 2 weeks from my test, awesome video like always. Thanks for the knowledge.
Luis, The HOME STRETCH... stay confident... STAY STRONG!!
thank for beautiful explanation, but how can i get the old videos about OR,RR AR& ARR?
The videos should be out there...
@17:09 p-value/power/beta Question
once again i'm here for the bestestttttt biostats teacher ever for my step 2 CK. done with step1, highly recomment Randy Neil, MD. i literally can't stress it enough how important it is to watch and understand his videos.
Appreciate the kind words!
Hello doc I’m preparing for step1 and my scores are not improving can you please advise me what should I do thanks in advance
Neelum, Start from scratch... change the mindset... Take your weakest topic and start from there... LEARN IT as though I was going to have you teach it LIVE without using notes... Don't move on from the topic until you can do that...
When I watched you are videos the first idea pop into my head was (Please, we need more and more) do not hold back these informative quick reviews.
Thank you Abdallah. I will continue to make more. As long as you tell me they are helpful.
BLESS YOU FOR THIS DOCTOR. seriously. THANK GOD i found your videos
Thank you. Glad it was helpful.
No tengo palabras para agradecer videos como estos. Gracias, muchas gracias.
Hello Dr. MCNeil, wanted to thank you for you step 1 videos , they helped me pass ! I also wanted to also to kindly ask you if you could please make Step 2 Ck videos, you are a pioneer in explanatng medical concepts. I would really really appreciate any step 2 content . I recently took my step 2 ck and failed in part because I did not study enough,i did my step 2 without passing a single NBME practice form, dumb I know but I will put more on my part this 2nd time . Dr.could you please orient me on any study materials or videos ? Thank you, and God bless
Thank you. Used it for my first day of step 3 and it came in clutch.
Such a good feeling to have confidence with certain questions!
Prepping for Family Medicine Boards, appreciated your assistance through all the Steps to get here.
Absolutely. Glad it has been helpful.
Sir , thank you so much for all the quality work you have done.
You are most welcome.
Sir where from 1st should start?? 0:54
Bio-stats DR RANDY NEIL
Pathology DR SATTAR
Remaining DR JASON RYAN
Sattar is KING.
@@RandyNeilMD My exam is in about 4 months
Already done with a first pass In FA, about 50%in UW... but I STILL FEEL LIKE I DON’T HAVE MANY TIME because I’d like to do 2 more passes in FA, 3 passes in total with UW. I’m wondering if I have to follow this plan OR edit it and include pathoma videos and/or book in it...
I’d like to get your advices, please.
Or, any one who already take step 1🙏🏾
Ps: sorry if my English is terrible😊
Mille merci Dr Neil ! Thank you so much! I really struggled with biostats, your teaching skills made it so easy to look at these questions with a calm mind and more confidence!
Glad it was helpful! Keep me posted on your progress and testing...
@@RandyNeilMDwill surely do. Thanks again
Great, short and succinct. Thank you, Prof Randy!
Amazing Video for Step 2 CK!
Thank you
U R AMAZING DR.Neil , really appreciate your help for us in this journey
Glad it is helpful.
Great review of questions...piece of cake 🍰
Thanks Doc🙌🏻
Perfect.
Dr you made a very hard subject easy and understandable, I really appreciate your efforts. many thanks.
Sara, You are most welcome.
Sir you have done amazing videos and I have passed my pharmacy board exam .Thank you so much for this great efforts
CONGRATULATIONS!! Enjoy the moment...
Dr. Neil, I apologize if you have answered this question already. But are you planning on doing Biostats videos for Step-2CK by any chance?
Rafi, It has been my experience and understanding that the BIOSTATS videos here should be good enough for STAP 1, 2, & 3.
Thank you Dr. Neil. I really appreciate you getting back to me. The sole reason I got through Step-1 Biostats (recently) was because of your videos. Looking forward to rewatching and reviewing them again for Step-2.
Pls add some more Step-2CK materials (various topics) if you have the chance.
Thank you.
thank you for these videos !god bless you!!!
You are most welcome!
am I tripping or at 24:00 isn't C still incorrect because the second half of the question includes 40 in the denominator? shouldn't it be (40/160) instead of (40/(40+160)) ? thank you for your videos they are incredibly helpful!
best channel
Thank you again.
cohoRt = Relative Risk
case-contrOl = Odds Ratio
Vishav, Thank you for sharing.
Dr. Neil, Thank you so much for your amazing videos. I had a question- isn't PPV related to Specificity and NPV related to Sensitivity? I mean if specificity increases ,then PPV increases and vice versa and if Sensitivity increases then NPV does and vice versa.But, if we have to calculate PPV, we use Sensitivity values(top values) and for NPV Specificity values(bottom). So, how come PPV related to specificity and NPV to Sensitivity?
Hard to explain in words... If I get a chance to do another video, I'll try and include this...
@@RandyNeilMD Thank you so much!!
wowwwwwwwwwwwwww
Glad it was helpful.
I am an IMG, the first thing I am gonna do is to meet you and appreciate your work. GOVERNOR OF BIOSTATS
We shall share a drink after you get into residency....
@@RandyNeilMD Will be my best day of life, deal done :')
You're absolutely uh-mazing!! I literally don't know what i would have done without your biostats vids!!
Christine, Thank you for taking time to comment. Glad the videos have been helpful.
Quick and to the point. Great job once again Dr Neil, thank you!
Mohamed, Thank you for commenting. Keep studying HARD!!
For the problem at 13:48, why don't we consider the true positives and true negatives? Because to me, every number is getting smaller, TN/TP/FN/FP. So just logistically, I would have said nothing changes. Because the numerator got small as the denominator got small as well.
Biostatistics made easy. Thank you Dr. Neil.
Nnandi, Thank you for taking time to comment.
Thank you so much ,as always great and useful.Please make videos for respiratory physiology
Fereshtah, Respiratory wasn't my Favorite, but I'll eventually get to that topic...
@@RandyNeilMD thank you ☺️
Thankyouuuu dr Randy ,I wish I had you next to me during stats 🤣
Thank you for the vote of confidence... I think you'll do fine with me there "in spirit"...
you're really marvelous and such a humble and calming force. Thankyou.
Thank you Morgan. Appreciate your kind words.
In the question about the USMLE scores isn't it supposed to be a cross sectional type?
and aren't the answer choices supposed to be test names in the first place? (such as t-test, ANOVA, Chi-square...) --> if so it would be a Chi-square test I assume, right?
dr neil is the best...i struggled with biostats and ethics in step-1. dr neil's channel is a blessing. thank u sir
Thank you Suraj
Hi Dr. Neil! Quick clarifying question: in a previous video you stated that if the confidence interval crosses 1, it is not significant. However in this video, you said if it crosses 0 it is not significant. Are both true?
Thank you for this! Always hear your explanations in my head when I’m solving “sensitivity is down, the compare is our division sign…”
Glad it is helpful... It WILL work on all exams.
This is gold! Thank you thank you thank you! I am no longer afraid of biostats!
CRUSH IT.
Dr. Neil thank u for ur videos, u are a big help to understanding biostats!😊
Karina, Thank you for commenting. Glad it was helpful.
So thankful for your videos!!!
You are welcome. Keep me posted on your progress..
Never seen such a simplified and comprehensive lecture of biostat.
Moseeb, Thank you for taking time to comment.
My step 3 is tomorrow . Thank you so much.
I hope you CRUSHED it... !!!
so excited had to comment before watching. THANK Dr Randy.
Hazazi, Thank you for the support and kindness...!!
24.33 isnt it 600/ 600+200?
Thank you Dr for this video it is so helpful
Marina, Glad it was helpful.
Thank you for these videos! So helpful! Can you please do a video on Bradford hill criteria as well? So confused
I really appreciate your effort, Dr. Thank you is not enough !
Glad it was helpful.
Mad respect for you my man. Hoping to match this season so I can thank you in person someday haha
Excellent, Dr Neil. Thank you so much
Ryan, You are most welcome.
Great explanation doctor
Thanks a lot 💓
Keep doing more videos on both biostat and ethics
Pott, Glad you found it helpful... I'll keep trying to add stuff that is useful... Thank you for the feedback...
Visited this video for step 1 now coming back for step 2. Thanks for this great video👌
Thanx very match ❤️👍🏻
Muhammad... MATCH... good subliminal...