S&W 3" Model 66 Combat Magnum - Classic Revolver Review

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 26 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 324

  • @bsmithhammer
    @bsmithhammer 6 ปีที่แล้ว +42

    "...this revolver is never leaving my collection. I may well be buried with this revolver."
    When was the last time you heard anyone say this about a plastic semi? People either "get" revolvers, or they don't. I feel the same way about my Wiley Clapp GP100 3".

    • @hrfunk
      @hrfunk  6 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      Now that you mention it, I’ve never heard anyone say something like that about a plastic pistol. Let grave robbers beware!

  • @kentuckyjustice1408
    @kentuckyjustice1408 6 ปีที่แล้ว +55

    Who doesn't love those wheel guns! Great revolver.

    • @hrfunk
      @hrfunk  6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      I think so too!

    • @giuseppecangiamila3395
      @giuseppecangiamila3395 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@hrfunk me too

    • @kylewood8327
      @kylewood8327 ปีที่แล้ว

      I’ve been shooting S&W revolvers since 1982. Have a few in my collection.

    • @TresAmigos-ix9vo
      @TresAmigos-ix9vo 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You would be suprised! I get judged and made fun of every time I buy a new revolver😢

  • @kenkaufman6760
    @kenkaufman6760 6 ปีที่แล้ว +34

    Kframe snubs are THE classic revolver in my book. Thanks for sharing this one with us. Not much that can't be done with a 3" 357magnum.

    • @hrfunk
      @hrfunk  6 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      I agree. Thanks for the comment!

    • @plooker39
      @plooker39 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Unless you have a 4 inch 19 TTT!

  • @precisionmarksman5084
    @precisionmarksman5084 6 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Really enjoy your revolver presentations, very much. Having carried and shot revolvers for 45 years, I have great admiration for them particularly snub-nose versions. Recently I have become interested in big bore short barrel revolvers and regularly practice with the Ruger Redhawk Kodiak 2.75" .44 magnum and Ruger Super Redhawk Alaskan 2.5" .454 casull revolvers. I've found both to be super accurate out to 25 yards, and manageable even with powerful loads. I do shoot a Ruger GP 100 2.5" .357 also, which feels quite tame after shooting the other two.

  • @ducktapepilot
    @ducktapepilot 6 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Great video! Gotta love the old Smith wheel guns, especially in .357

  • @lj.7311
    @lj.7311 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video. I love watching Smith revolver videos made by informative interesting hosts.

    • @hrfunk
      @hrfunk  ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you!

  • @armstronglance
    @armstronglance 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I love the look of this one!!!! Love S&M Revolvers!

  • @richardjohnson4238
    @richardjohnson4238 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Another great presentation Howard. I always enjoy your stuff.

    • @hrfunk
      @hrfunk  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you Richard!

  • @soylentgreen7074
    @soylentgreen7074 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Sweet belt, I like how it looks like a 1907 sling. And the eagle globe and anchor proudly displayed.

    • @hrfunk
      @hrfunk  6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I like it too. I recently received it as a gift from a former Marine named Richard Turner. He owns Turner Saddlery and makes a limited number of these belts.

  • @dangerman007
    @dangerman007 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    My first revolver I purchased 29 years ago was a Taurus 65 3 inch. I still have it and in fact I carried it today. The three inch is very concealable and also is very accurate as your test proved. You don't lose that much velocity and they are very fast pointing. I wouldn't complain if they put this revolver in my coffin; always best to be prepared!

    • @hrfunk
      @hrfunk  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I agree!

  • @Desperado3248
    @Desperado3248 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have a 3 inch model 10 and a 3 inch model 65. Perfect balance , handling, sight radius and handling. Carries well on the belt . Hard to believe that the same company that made my revolvers and yours , makes the garbage they do today.

    • @hrfunk
      @hrfunk  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I agree, the 3" revolvers are just right for carry. I'm not sure why the 2.5" versions seemed to be more popular.

    • @Desperado3248
      @Desperado3248 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      As I recall the original 3 incher was a limited run model 19for US Customs Dept, that was for some reason standardized as a 2 1/2 model., that was continued as the barrel length in the 66 . I foolishly passed on a limited run version years ago , so I picked up a 3 inch 65 while they were still available. Yours is a nice one

  • @kylewood8327
    @kylewood8327 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Edit: I just picked up a 66-2 w/2 1/2in. barrel. I’ve been looking for one of these for a couple years now. Going to go great with my 19-4 6inch.
    Great gun and video! I would definitely like to have one of these in my collection to go with my 3inch 686 Plus!

  • @JeepsCafe
    @JeepsCafe ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent! I love that .357 the wood grips really makes the revolver stand out. Still one of the best vids on the .357 revolver four years later.

    • @hrfunk
      @hrfunk  ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you!

  • @davidinghram2494
    @davidinghram2494 23 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I sure enjoy mine. It was a Lew Horton gun. I worked on mine myself, and it is wonderfully smooth.

  • @russelder9743
    @russelder9743 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    That is one beautiful revolver, and you sure know how to use it. I have to try the two targets....looks like fun. I was just re-loading 357 for my S&W 620....I will take that over my semi ' s any day for fun at the club

    • @hrfunk
      @hrfunk  6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      There’s just something about a fine revolver.

  • @charlesbradley2943
    @charlesbradley2943 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thanks for the video. Just found a 66 3” & looking forward to shooting the pup.

  • @1957robertjohnson
    @1957robertjohnson 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Nice video. The Model 66 is a great gun. Many people don't realize that the K frame magnums were in production for 25 years before the introduction of the L frame. They stayed in production for another 25 years. Reports of their weakness has been overblown.
    I remember when Ashland was selling those three inch guns. We were making the switch to 9mm so the 66 got passed by. I wish I bought one.
    But the advantage that the 2 1/2 inch gun and it's short ejector rod has, is that it is impossible for a round to slip under the star. Especially with 38 special ammo. I doesn't happen often. But when it does it's not an easy jam to clear.

    • @wehrewulf
      @wehrewulf 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Why would "many" people not realize that? It is isn't a secret.

    • @1957robertjohnson
      @1957robertjohnson 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@wehrewulf Because many people say they were too weak for magnums. They also are fond of saying that the L frame was brought out because of this. It's not true. If it was the K frame magnum would have been discontinued at that time not produced for another 25 years. The L frame was made to compete with thee Python.

    • @bobjohnson1633
      @bobjohnson1633 ปีที่แล้ว

      The L frame was specifically designed because of the cut shank on the k frame had a problem with cracking due to light bullets in 357. The prototype L frames were known as "super K" and none are known to exist.
      K frames in 357 were actually discontinued and all k frames were eventually discontinued altogether.
      The 66-8 was released as a sort of super K frame and brought the k frame back after it had been entirely discontinued. I have both the new 66 and 19. They are very nice.

  • @bryanwadebarney
    @bryanwadebarney 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Classic revolver! I have always loved S&W revolvers and the model 66 .357 magnum is a great do all gun in a relatively compact package. I really enjoy your presentations and approach. Clearly you have a great deal of experience instructing others on the subject of firearms. As a professional educator myself (special education) I respect those who take the time to share their particular subjects of expertise with others.

    • @hrfunk
      @hrfunk  6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I’ve been a firearms instructor for a long time, but I’m in awe of teachers. Your ability to convey information amazes me. Thank you for educating our children.

  • @dbx1233
    @dbx1233 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    That shooting was more than adequate and that revolver is a fine piece of craftsmanship.

    • @hrfunk
      @hrfunk  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you!

  • @gunvlog
    @gunvlog 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I love my 4" Mod. 66 no dash........superb trigger, good handling and just fun to shoot

    • @hrfunk
      @hrfunk  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      There's nothing quite like the "Combat Magnum!"

    • @gunvlog
      @gunvlog 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      th-cam.com/video/z6AEIgox6D4/w-d-xo.html

  • @robertclark2759
    @robertclark2759 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Years ago I fired some 38 special rounds at targets attached to stacked car tires like the ones in your video. The bullets bounced back and sailed over the heads of everyone on the firing line. Tires are not the best choice for downrange features, especially for the short distances.

    • @hrfunk
      @hrfunk  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I use the tires to simulate cover. I don’t typically shoot at them.

  • @kentonhammond8938
    @kentonhammond8938 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I have the 2 & 1/2" barreled stainless model 686 + 7 shot .357. One of my personal favorites. Very little difference in the K & L frame ! Like you, my Son will inherit mine. I carry it a lot, especially up here in Wisconsin where flannel shirts are worn half the year, if not more. I almost always carry OWB, since we have both open & concealed carry here. Love my high power revolvers !

    • @hrfunk
      @hrfunk  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      So do I!

  • @jc-vc7xq
    @jc-vc7xq 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have four and six inch model19’s. I would absolutely love to have a 3 inch. I haven’t seen them for years though. Always a pleasure to watch a combat magnum in action.

    • @hrfunk
      @hrfunk  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I happened across one at a gun show a year or two ago. It was pretty well used (although, not abused so far as I could tell). The fellow selling it was still asking a pretty hefty price. If you watch the used guns cases, you never know what might show up there. In any event, you're right. They don't appear too often.

  • @Zona-dw9rp
    @Zona-dw9rp 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great intro, hr funk. Good overall review as well. Best gun channel on TH-cam. Keep up the good work.

    • @hrfunk
      @hrfunk  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you!

  • @pekolucky
    @pekolucky ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video HR. I've had good luck with the S&W gunsmiths in the past. They did a trigger job on my Model 625 that was smooth as silk. I'm going to attempt to lighten the trigger pull on my newly acquired, but previously owned, Model 66-8. I ordered a Wolff spring to replace the factory spring which makes it very difficult to pull the trigger in double action. Your video taking apart a Model 66 and cleaning it up gave me the confidence to give it a try. Thanks again.

    • @hrfunk
      @hrfunk  ปีที่แล้ว

      Be sure to test fire it after you change the springs. Sometimes a spring swap will result in light primer strikes/misfires. Best of luck!

    • @pekolucky
      @pekolucky ปีที่แล้ว

      Will do, thanks HR.@@hrfunk

  • @maxmccain8950
    @maxmccain8950 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have some grips like that on one of mine for presentation only. They're sliker than snot to shoot. For that I switch to rubber grips. Nice gun and great video sir, as usual.

  • @sunnymares459
    @sunnymares459 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great review! This is my favorite wheel gun period! I have a model 19 4inch and the model 65 3 inch version but I'm hoping to get the model 66 someday soon.

    • @1957robertjohnson
      @1957robertjohnson 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I think the 65 three inch is the better combat gun. But now I only use revolvers bigger than a J frame at the range, so I prefer the adjustable sights of the 66. Good luck in your quest.

  • @oldcop18
    @oldcop18 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Mine is a new in box 4” from 1973 I p/u from a friend who bought it new and just put it away. I’ve had it to the range a few times and am still working on breaking in the 12 pound trigger.

  • @patrickslevin6424
    @patrickslevin6424 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I love 3" revolvers especially for holster carry. I bought a Ruger SP101 with a 3" tube and I do love that revolver. It's light enough the most I like to shoot is 38 special +P+ type cartridges. It's picky, I've only found one load that will shoot POA, it's 5 grains of Unique and a 158 grain bullet. You certainly have a beautiful S&W H.R., wish I'd bought those and kept them years ago.

    • @joefw2446
      @joefw2446 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I too have the SP101, 3 inch, .357 ... Added Pach Diamond Pro grips. Well balanced. Wonderful.
      Agreed that S&W is sweet!

    • @hrfunk
      @hrfunk  6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you! I don't recall ever shooting an SP101. I might just have to try one out some day!

  • @straightpipec6099
    @straightpipec6099 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Very nice gun and video. Doesn’t get any better than this.

  • @chrismitchell4226
    @chrismitchell4226 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome video and review! I like the fact that you actually show where your shots are landing on target, the people who review guns and only show themselves shooting is boring and they're obviously ashamed of their ability or lack of . Good job again sir!

    • @hrfunk
      @hrfunk  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you Chris!

  • @Snowman366
    @Snowman366 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for another enjoyable and informative video, Sarge. A wheel man is a real man...!

    • @hrfunk
      @hrfunk  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you!

  • @frankvandornis4373
    @frankvandornis4373 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    You nailed it again with the "66". this along with my 3" 65 are two of my collection that I can't imagine getting rid of. keep up the excellent work.

    • @hrfunk
      @hrfunk  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Will do. Thanks for the comment!

  • @chrischiampo7647
    @chrischiampo7647 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    My New Favorite Revolver Thanks For The Awesome Review 😀😀👍🏼 Those Grips are Really Cool Too

    • @hrfunk
      @hrfunk  6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you!

  • @davidhawthorne7423
    @davidhawthorne7423 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    You inspired me to watch this one while the snow is coming down. Very pleased to see you do some things that took me 30-35 years to figure out. I also cock the revolver with my left thumb in single action. You shoot double action similar to the way I gradually learned with lots of practice. My wife and I both like a Hogue, one piece wood grip similar to yours, on the revolvers we actually carry. This one was very educational for my. Thanks!

    • @hrfunk
      @hrfunk  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      You’re welcome Dave! Thanks for watching.

  • @wbwills2
    @wbwills2 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Thank you for the video. My six-year-old daughter knows how much I love my 66. When I'm gone it will be on her hip and surely one of her most prized possessions. She's only six but we've had the conversation and arrangements have been made. I seriously doubt it will ever leave the family. It might be in my hand or holster for an open casket viewing if there is one but it will not be buried with me. That would be a horrible waste . What holster are you using if you don't mind me asking. Thank you .Burke Wills.
    Sandhills of North Carolina. Hope you and yours have a happy holidays and many more.

    • @hrfunk
      @hrfunk  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Happy Holidays to you and yours, Burke. The holster in the video was crafted by a local maker who has since passed away. I am fortunate to have it, but to my knowledge, there are not any more out there.

    • @wbwills2
      @wbwills2 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      hrfunk .thank you for getting back to me so quickly. Was able to get a good enough look at the holster so I'll probably be able to find a very similar one. I am currently using a Garrett industries STX .Opted for leather snaps. It's hard to tell from pictures online but I figured it would distribute the weight and be quick on and off . I took approximately a $140 leap of faith on that one. Thankfully it turned out better than I thought .super comfortable, concealable, and quiet. They're great check them out.. I do need a leather holster with good thumb break strap retention that also is reinforced for re-holstering. High ride like yours. I am determined not to have a drawer full of the wrong holsters. I really like the Garrett stx and will continue to use it alot (actually...probably more often than the one I'm asking you about . It will depend on what's on the agenda for the day. holsters are like shoes, boats, etc. one can't be perfect for every situation or application. I'll wind up with 3 holsters (1 IWB . Uncomfortable and will not get used much but do need one once in a blue moon. Inexpensive ,simple sticky type is more than likely the most practical, convenient and comfortable option ,BUT, spend twice the $ and get the J4 tactical Quick Click magnetic . Both would work but the J4 can be used for other hand guns of similar size . And occasionally go in my boot . Just now decided on the magnets over the sticky .the 66-2,2.5"(not 3"but shoots like a dream and I Love it as is )With your law-enforcement background and obvious enthusiasm for that particular firearm i'm thinking it might behoove me to follow your lead on holster selection. I've got a feeling you've done your research and been through a few. Thank you for your time and work.
      WBW II
      PS. FYI,black cherry 320 VZ grips are working out pretty darn good too . Did my homework only bought one set. That 66 must be a good luck charm . I'm batting 1000 on accessories.. so far...Rare.
      PSS. Sorry to get so long-winded. I was mentioning those other holsters just in case you might be in need something different every now and then. I know that Garrett is good . I'll let you know about the J4 sometime in the future.
      Have a good one

    • @hrfunk
      @hrfunk  5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      The nice thing is that there are a ton of holster/grip options for the S&W K-Frame revolvers. I have no doubt you’ll find one (or more) of each to your liking. Thanks for watching, and thanks for the comment!

  • @ramoncote1620
    @ramoncote1620 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have 1986 686 combat master with 1.75” barrel. My favorite pistol

  • @glennsammon4465
    @glennsammon4465 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I agree with you about the problems with the revolvers. S&W would not have sold them if the barrels would end up flying down range. I think departments were over training with them pushing the guns past their service life and that is were the problems started. I do baby mine but have shot full power ( flaming fire rings going down range and all) loads and the guns just ate them up. I have the "pinned and recessed" M19s in 2.5, 4, and 6 inch barrels. as well as one M66 with 2.5 inch and a M65 3 incher. they are all finely crafted revolvers . though I would consider getting the new M66 with 2.75 inch barrel and keep babying my older ones. so I can be buried with them. great video as always HR. thanks for sharing. keep the revolver videos coming please.

    • @hrfunk
      @hrfunk  8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Will do. I’m working on another one now.

  • @markorkarenhanes1354
    @markorkarenhanes1354 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice grips. Look like Badger brand grips. Got a set for my 640 PD, in high gloss Lacewood.

  • @garyK.45ACP
    @garyK.45ACP 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great classic gun! When I entered law enforcement in 1973, I had to buy my own duty revolver. I badly wanted the Model 19 4". I'll bet the 4" Model 19 had 50% of the police market in the early 70s. It was very popular. But it cost $21 more than a Colt Trooper MKIII and that was a lot of money for a rookie cop who had to lay out the dough for a handgun and leather gear, so I went with the Colt. The Colt was also my off-duty gun the first year. I carried it in a shoulder holster for concealment.
    FWIW, the Model 66 had come out a couple years before I became a police officer but they were WAY expensive at the time compared to a blued or nickel plated model. It was out of the question.
    A year later I bought a S&W Model 40 Centennial for a "proper" (easily concealable) off duty gun. And finally, in 1975, I bought a my Model 19...but I went with the 2.5" RB model. I still have it, still love it, and it is going nowhere! I used it for off duty and also for concealed carry after I retired. It is still in my CC "rotation" but it is not my EDC. It will given to one of my sons or grandchildren when "I no longer need it".
    The 3" would be just as good, with the added advantage of a slightly longer ejector, as you mentioned. Mine Model 19 shows no signs of damage after 45 years...admittedly I use mostly .38 Special loads for practice. But that WAS the idea of the Model 19/66 to begin with. Thanks for the video!

    • @hrfunk
      @hrfunk  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      You’re welcome! I plan to take my 3” 66 with me to the grave!

    • @garyK.45ACP
      @garyK.45ACP 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@hrfunk I hadn't considered that option. I have a spreadsheet program of my firearms inventory, all backed up on "thumb drives", one in a safe in the house and the other in the bank safe deposit box, with all the details of each gun and a couple photos of each...mostly for insurance purposes if need be. But each also describes a "disposition". All of them are to be distributed to my sons and/or grandchildren. And each has a name assigned to it.
      Some of the guns I have passed along already.

  • @MPGunther1
    @MPGunther1 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Beautiful wheel gun and nice shootin'

  • @shawn7583
    @shawn7583 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great shooting and performance I like it and I I have this model

  • @82lowe36id
    @82lowe36id 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Would love to have one of the 3 inch Model 66 magnums. Beautiful pistol!

    • @hrfunk
      @hrfunk  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you!

  • @Shamrockrancher
    @Shamrockrancher 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I like the rifle sling belt. Very clever!

  • @leewatts5956
    @leewatts5956 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I’ve owned a 2.5 inch 66 and a nickel 2.5 inch model 19 for which I carried for years in the early 80’s. Well balanced, beautiful and just felt great in the hand with the round butt. They shot great and were very combat accurate for a snub. But I always wished I could have had a 3 inch.

    • @hrfunk
      @hrfunk  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I have a 2.5" Model 19, and I really like it, but the 3" M66 is my favorite!

  • @talkingrock7011
    @talkingrock7011 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I think you will take it with you . the 686 is a favorite of mine

    • @hrfunk
      @hrfunk  6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Mine too. For a carry/fighting revolver, I’d opt for the M66. For a general purpose “field revolver”, I’d go with the 686.

  • @casualobserver3145
    @casualobserver3145 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice shooting HR....especially with the .357 rounds! I also own a M66, mine is a 4”. It spent its career on the hip of a LE officer. The dept decided to go with Glocks and retired all its revolvers. That worked out good for me!

    • @hrfunk
      @hrfunk  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Those are classic revolvers. I'm glad your found a good home.

  • @swkohnle08
    @swkohnle08 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very nice S&W 66. Great shooting as always. Thank you for the video.

  • @scubaguy007
    @scubaguy007 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    That’s a beautiful gun. I had a 2" model 66 and I wanted to love it so much but it would bust my middle knuckle whenever I shot it. Much like yours I had walnut grips with contoured finger groves with Smith and Wesson medallion. It was a beautiful gun, but it was painful to shoot because of my middle knuckle. I tried a smaller set of Pachmayr grips to see if that would help and it didn’t so there was no other choice but to get rid of it. I sometimes wish I still had it, but only because it was such a beautiful gun. I’m over having show pony’s in my collection.

    • @hrfunk
      @hrfunk  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Too bad that one didn’t work for you. I love my 3”.

  • @6omega2
    @6omega2 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I think most of the reported problems with .357 Magnum loads in K Frame Smiths came from the very hot 125 grain loads, which were cracking the forcing cone according to some. The 158 grain loads don't seem to cause problems.

    • @hrfunk
      @hrfunk  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      I thought I said that in the video, but maybe I’m thinking of one of my others. In any case, I think you’re right. I also think that problem was very overstated.

    • @6omega2
      @6omega2 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      My apologies - you probably did. I skip around watching videos a lot. Your videos are great by the way.

    • @1957robertjohnson
      @1957robertjohnson 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      The original K frame magnums were in production for 25 years before the introduction of the L frame. They stayed in production for another 25 years. If there was a serious problem, they wouldn't have been in production 50 years.
      Some of us are old enough to remember that the L frame was introduced to compete with the Python in competitions. Not because of any shortcoming with the K frame.

  • @LA_Commander
    @LA_Commander 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    You are a great shot! I daily carry a Smith & Wesson J frame with 38 special +P, but for winter carry or for when I go to the mountains I would love to have the additional firepower of a full 357. That S&W combat model 66 with the 2.75" barrel looks like one terrific gun! I would love to have one. I am not a believer in 357 on these small J-frame size revolvers (like the Ruger LCR or the Taurus 605, for ex.). For 357 you really need to have the heavier steel full size frame.

    • @hrfunk
      @hrfunk  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      The larger frame and grip definitely help with controllability. I hope you can find one of those 2.75” guns. They seem to be somewhat scarce at the moment.

  • @soylentgreen7074
    @soylentgreen7074 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Same reason I never liked single action armies or clones with under 4 3/4” barrel, gotta have that full length extractor rod for fast and reliable unloading.

    • @hrfunk
      @hrfunk  6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I really like that aspect of the 3" .357's.

  • @kenkong4545
    @kenkong4545 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video of this classic pistol, and it seems with the modifications done it shoots very well. Good to see you're still in shape also, thanks...

    • @hrfunk
      @hrfunk  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you!

  • @xtreme4stringbass
    @xtreme4stringbass 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The new 2.75 has a full length ejector due to crane lockup.

  • @vincentj3093
    @vincentj3093 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I agree the 3” is probably the best length to have. I have a mint 66-3 snub nose and I believe it is the best looking one, you can’t beat the look of a snub nose. If and when I find a 3” 66 and or a 19 I will definitely buy it. I’m also keeping an eye out for a 4” . You can’t have to many revolvers.

    • @hrfunk
      @hrfunk  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Nope. I agree!

  • @danoneill2846
    @danoneill2846 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I had a 4" Mod 65 it did have issues with 357 mags , after the 2nt time it locked up I sold it . I would only use 38 sp +P ... No Mags .

    • @danoneill2846
      @danoneill2846 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I don't know much about how they are put together , as far as I know , there is a pin that holds some parts , welded on one end to the frame , it was bent from 125 gr JHP @ 1400 fps .. Not many .

  • @frankcastelo6980
    @frankcastelo6980 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video! Me and my wife love to watch you taking down the water bottle desperados. And now I'm interested in trying out that gun!

    • @hrfunk
      @hrfunk  6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks to you and your wife! If you manage to acquire a 3” M-66, I don’t think you’ll be disappointed!

  • @TreeTop1947
    @TreeTop1947 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    The opening scene of your 3" Model 66 displayed with your badge and handcuffs is very nice! Semper Fi, TreeTop

    • @hrfunk
      @hrfunk  6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Semper Fi! Thank you.

  • @Big-hg5zf
    @Big-hg5zf 6 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Do you still carry that 66? It's a hunk of steel at some 34 ounces, but then you shoot it better than the semi-autos you've been featuring on the channel.
    ETA: How about a video of comparing your 66 against the new re-issue S&W combat 66 w/2.75" barrel? I'm curious to see how the new ones stack up to the old.

    • @hrfunk
      @hrfunk  6 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      If I can get my hands on a new one, I’ll do that!

    • @Zona-dw9rp
      @Zona-dw9rp 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I have a 66-8, 2 3/4" barrel. I have never fired an older model, but the 66-8 is wonderful. 158 gr, .357 rounds do well. Recoil is manageable, accuracy is very good, quality of build is good. Highly recommended and don't let the lock, two-piece barrel or ball detent deter you. These are just modern updates to a great design.

    • @Gieszkanne
      @Gieszkanne 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Zona-dw9rp The new 66 with the two piece barrel are build stonger. The cylinder has a ball frame lock instead in front of the barrel on the rod and a full forcing cone. Old 66 somtimes cracked there if they where shot to much with hot 125gr loads.

    • @Zona-dw9rp
      @Zona-dw9rp 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Gieszkanne thanks for the reply. I enjoy wheel guns. Just got a Model 19 classic. Hope you enjoy your shooting and stay safe.

  • @chipsterb4946
    @chipsterb4946 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    “I may be buried with this revolver.” I feel the same way about my 3” Model 66.

  • @bryanmartin2271
    @bryanmartin2271 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good shooting and very informative and well said

    • @hrfunk
      @hrfunk  ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks Bryan!

  • @RandyMan388
    @RandyMan388 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for the video, nice shooting.
    Hey, really like your belt.
    Take care

    • @hrfunk
      @hrfunk  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks Randy!

  • @elsullo2
    @elsullo2 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thanks for displaying that ultimate work of art! It IS the perfect carry gun! Good Smith and Wesson revolvers, jewelry that shoots!...…………………………...elsullo

    • @hrfunk
      @hrfunk  6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You’re welcome. I’m glad you liked it!

  • @marie-noellebaechler1433
    @marie-noellebaechler1433 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for this very nice video about a superb revolver

    • @hrfunk
      @hrfunk  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You’re welcome. Thanks for watching!

  • @vicsage83
    @vicsage83 ปีที่แล้ว

    I think the concern was consistent use of hot 125 gr .357 loads and damage to the forcing cone. I thought I read somewhere the modern K frames are stronger and that isn’t a concern/problem anymore? Great video btw

    • @hrfunk
      @hrfunk  ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you!

  • @Win94ae
    @Win94ae 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I had a 2.5" 66-2 that broke its hammer nose, and they don't make them anymore. I was so good with that gun!
    I need to fix it soon.

    • @hrfunk
      @hrfunk  6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Oh my! You really do need to get that one fixed!

    • @Win94ae
      @Win94ae 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@hrfunk I did get it fixed, I had to modify a hammer nose from another model.

    • @hrfunk
      @hrfunk  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I’m glad that worked!

  • @richardkluesek4301
    @richardkluesek4301 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank You for sharing your treasure, btw Chris at Lucky Gunner also has one of these and made a nice presentation as well. I have a new '66-8 which differs by having mim rather than forged internal parts, a 2 piece barrel (external shroud with internal sleeve) and a frame mounted firing pin rather than on the hammer. The frame is slightly higher with an old style triple lock rather than the ejector rod tip lock, making the forcing cone fully round eliminating the flat spot at 6 o clock to acommodate the crane closure as on the classic guns. The S&W action is smooth but the newer versions probably not as slick as those earlier generations. Hope you can acquire one for review.

    • @hrfunk
      @hrfunk  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I would like to have one to review and compare to my older version. That would make for an interesting video!

    • @richardkluesek4301
      @richardkluesek4301 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@hrfunk Durings the 70s 80s and 90s I was an auxiliary cop and we provided our own personal revolvers if licensed as citizens, approved if these were 4" and chambered the .38 Special official PD load at particular times. Various S&W K frames dominated, then N s, Colts, and Rugers, and 1 guy had a Dan Wesson. I had opportunity over this time to check them all out at the range. Originally preferred Colt but have since disposed of these in favor of the new K 66-8, and a Speed Six, the 'ponies' are too collectable to serve hard and tough to rebuild, repair, and maintain for parts availability and someone able to work on them. I had bought into the argument of WB Smith "Pistols & Revolvers" that the Colt clockwise cylinder rotation was theoretically stronger, and that S&W's hollow ejector rod would back out to jam the cylinder in the frame window, as well as the hammer mounted firing pin would get stuck in magnum and +p primers. Maybe, but rare never witnessed this in near 50 years burning gunpowder. Since 2000 S&W and then Ruger are the best choices for revolvers, Colt fell behind because they did not follow through on their product improved line. And "Smiths have an aura.

    • @hrfunk
      @hrfunk  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      When it comes to revolvers I am partial to my Smiths. I’ve been shooting them for 30 years and they just plain work for me. I tend to gravitate toward the older ones, but I wouldn’t mind taking a couple of the more recently manufactured models out for a spin. Thanks for a great comment!

    • @richardkluesek4301
      @richardkluesek4301 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@hrfunk The new Kimber K6S and Colt King Cobras look promising and interest me theoretically as a revolver guy but the S&W s are the best bet, new or old. I bypassed the lock and plugged the hole on the 66-8. Old Ruger Security Six series are ok too as seconds. Other odd ball brands are not even in my consideration. Good shootin' always learn something new or forgotten from your great good work.

    • @Zona-dw9rp
      @Zona-dw9rp 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I have a new 66-8 with a 2.75 inch barrel and love it. A great pistol that I highly recommend.

  • @markbecker71
    @markbecker71 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks great video ,my first revolver was a colt trooper.so I'm parcel to colts.. Shot the heck out of it..

    • @hrfunk
      @hrfunk  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Nothing wrong with a good Colt!

  • @bobperrine6193
    @bobperrine6193 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I was upset with S&W when they revived the Model 66. I had previously owned a 2 1/2 inch Model 19, but always wanted a 3 inch 66. So, I acquired a 3 inch 686 +, which is a Great gun, just about 6 months before the reintroduction of the 66. Timing is everything.

    • @hrfunk
      @hrfunk  4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I understand your annoyance. Even so, the 3" 686 is a nice revolver.

  • @SaltyMaverick
    @SaltyMaverick 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very nice revolver, sir. Wish I had one like it.

    • @hrfunk
      @hrfunk  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      It's my favorite revolver. There are others I really like, but that it the one that will never leave my collection. Take care, Brian, and thanks for the comment!

  • @kodew229
    @kodew229 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great videos man! Very informative and entertaining

    • @hrfunk
      @hrfunk  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you!

  • @LM-sc8lu
    @LM-sc8lu 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    That Model 66 was my carry weapon the entire time I worked Undercover Narcotics, and for about four years after I came back into the real world as a Criminal Investigator. I held onto it as long as I could, but the Sheriff finally ordered me to start carry the "new" 9mm semi-autos. The only difference with mine were the Pachmayr grips. It was, by far, the best handgun I ever owned, and I consistently shot 94-99% in qualifying. Not so much fun to shoot now that I'm an old fart with osteoarthritis riddled hands thanks to those "good ol' days" of breaking up bar fights, working U/C gangs, and just plain hard work.

    • @hrfunk
      @hrfunk  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      You had a find carry piece. Too bad you don't still have it. Thanks for watching!

  • @joeyphillips1181
    @joeyphillips1181 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    That's a beautiful revolver

    • @hrfunk
      @hrfunk  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you. I think so too.

  • @VictorTorres-cv2tt
    @VictorTorres-cv2tt 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Gorgeous revolver!

    • @hrfunk
      @hrfunk  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you Victor!

    • @VictorTorres-cv2tt
      @VictorTorres-cv2tt 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Seriously it’s a cool gun! I especially like the grips! Happy shooting. DON’T GET RID OF IT!

    • @hrfunk
      @hrfunk  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Not a chance. That one is going with me to the grave.

    • @VictorTorres-cv2tt
      @VictorTorres-cv2tt 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Amen, have a good day!

  • @Andrew-oh2nr
    @Andrew-oh2nr 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    What an awesome review. Its interesting the old school revolver shooters are such experts with these guns. Does the flat top crew cut make you shoot better? Maybe I should try it. I love the Midwest accent twang. I'm working on one of my own.

    • @hrfunk
      @hrfunk  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ha, ha! I don't know if the flattop helps my shooting, but it cetainly helps my appearance. When my hair gets too long I look ridiculous! Thanks for watching!

  • @mdd1963
    @mdd1963 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    NIce shooting, Sir!

    • @hrfunk
      @hrfunk  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you!

  • @sonnygunz9207
    @sonnygunz9207 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Love the 19 & 66 snubs.

    • @hrfunk
      @hrfunk  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Me too!

  • @brianlee6849
    @brianlee6849 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Something I've thought about several times watching your videos but never said is you have a very nice shop. It's nice to have a nice shop to work in. Do you do much mechanical or wood work or mostly loading and gun stuff? I've always thought restoring or sporterizing an old 1903 would be fun. Thanks

    • @hrfunk
      @hrfunk  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Nope, my shop is pretty much exclusively dedicated to firearms an ammunition.

    • @brianlee6849
      @brianlee6849 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@hrfunk Cool.

  • @maxfit68906
    @maxfit68906 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Out of all of my firearms I have ever owned, I wish I had never sold this one.
    Bought it in 95’ for $600. Kicking myself till this day. Looking at an original pre lock 66 2.5 inch in its original box. Amazing firearms to say the least.

    • @hrfunk
      @hrfunk  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      I agree. Too bad you let that one get away.

    • @rayhanes1347
      @rayhanes1347 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Wasnt that expensive back then?

    • @maxfit68906
      @maxfit68906 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      ray hanes Considering there were only a couple hundred made with the pre lock back then, that was actually a reasonable price. They’re going for $2K in mint condition on Gunbroker now days. You’d be lucky to find one under $1K in decent condition.

  • @michigunsanta8680
    @michigunsanta8680 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I’ve got a 3” 686+ “Talo” one but it’s a little big and heavy for conceal carry, I think that S&W 66 would be a lot better to carry. 🤔

    • @hrfunk
      @hrfunk  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      The Combat Magnums are built on the slightly smaller K-frame. Between that and the lighter barrel profile they do work a little better for concealed carry than the 686.

  • @-Wolfgang
    @-Wolfgang 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Carried a 4 inch Mod. 66 when I worked for the local sheriff's department in the 1980s.
    Shot many a perfect score with it.

    • @hrfunk
      @hrfunk  5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      If I ever find a good 4" for a descent price, I'll add it to my collection. There's just something about a good Combat Magnum!

    • @Folma7
      @Folma7 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      A local private security firm put all their M66, 4” on the block after transitioning to Glocks in the early 1990’s. Excellent shooter. The single action trigger pull is about 3.5 lbs. it’s my trail/camping companion. I forked over $150....best gun deal I ever found.

  • @quickdubbs328
    @quickdubbs328 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Always impressed by your videos HRF! Like yourself, I want 2 start my gun collection up again. And the .357 Magnum will be the pistol I'll have till judgement day! Can't deny, or get over the riveting power of that gun! I had 3 .357 Magnums. Unfortunately due 2 having the wrong company around @ that time why mine were stolen. You brought up a point that I never paid any attention 2. Length of the cylinder rod. I was looking @ the 8 shot 2.75 barrel performance center .357 Magnum. Think if I were 2 purchase that model. Would I have any problems u mentioned in this video?!

    • @hrfunk
      @hrfunk  6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I don’t think so. I believe the reason they went with a 2.75” barrel instead of a 2.5” was so they could use a full-length extractor rod.

  • @steveww1507
    @steveww1507 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Im saving up for a model 19 with the 4 in barrel .

    • @hrfunk
      @hrfunk  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I hope you find a good one!

    • @steveww1507
      @steveww1507 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@hrfunk going new

  • @danoneill2846
    @danoneill2846 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    If you want to impress her .. tell her you have a 3" That is the K frame I would want !!

  • @Tbone42tx
    @Tbone42tx 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video BUD, Ima Ruger GP100 fan but that's one nice revolver

    • @hrfunk
      @hrfunk  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you! Merry Christmas!

  • @bassman6619
    @bassman6619 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    One beautiful weapon!

    • @hrfunk
      @hrfunk  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you. I love it!

  • @telesleeper
    @telesleeper 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great shooting. Beautiful revolver.

    • @hrfunk
      @hrfunk  6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you!

    • @telesleeper
      @telesleeper 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      hrfunk if you don't mind me asking, how much was the magna porting? I recently bought a 66-8 combat magnum and am thinking of getting it ported. Thanks.

    • @hrfunk
      @hrfunk  6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It’s probably been 20 years since I had mine done. As I recall, the price was pretty reasonable. Something on the order of $65. If you check the Mag-na-port web site, you will find the current price.

    • @telesleeper
      @telesleeper 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      hrfunk thanks again for the quick response. Take care.

  • @user-lg4zm5nj8t
    @user-lg4zm5nj8t 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video as always.. he has a BOB ROSS likeability.

    • @hrfunk
      @hrfunk  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you!

  • @invictawarrior
    @invictawarrior 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good move on the 66 and getting those beautiful grips back in the 90's.

    • @hrfunk
      @hrfunk  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes, I'm glad I got them too. I wish I'd had a little more cash with me (for some reason they couldn't take a credit card at the factory). The same grips with the S&W medallions were a little more expensive and I would have preferred them. Even so, I really like the ones I got!

  • @thomasosteen9936
    @thomasosteen9936 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great shooting and thanks for the video

    • @hrfunk
      @hrfunk  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      You’re welcome. Thanks for the comment!

  • @mikerutchka1836
    @mikerutchka1836 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    A bit off-topic, but where did you get the 1907-sling-style belt? Haven't see that before, but it looks pretty nice.

    • @hrfunk
      @hrfunk  6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I saw your questions earlier, and haven’t had time to type out an adequate answer. The short answer is my belt came from Turner Saddlery. More info to follow.

  • @randym6439
    @randym6439 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    A few things:
    1. I have always loved 3" revolvers especially full of mostly full lug. Just looks more proportional to me.
    2. Have you ever chronographed the .357 vs the .38 Spl out of the 3" vs 4-5" bbls. Might be interesting.
    3. Can you fit square butt grips to these?
    4. Nice belt. Is that made from a M1907 sling? Commercially available?
    Great video!

    • @hrfunk
      @hrfunk  6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      OK, I've got a little time now, so here goes:
      1. I like both the full lug, and the barrel shroud (as on the M66/19). The full lug helps reduce muzzle flip by adding weight to the muzzle, but since my M66 is mag-na-ported, that does a better job of reducing the same muzzle rise without adding weight to the revolver.
      2. Yes, I have. You're right, that might make an interesting video in the future.
      3. You could attach grips with a square-butt profile, but obviously since the grip frame is rounded, you could not use true square-butt grits.
      My belt was made by Richard Turner of Turner Saddlery. He makes them with the same leather he uses and then adds the brass hardware. Richard is a former Marine, and he makes a limited number of these belts for others. Mine actually has my name stamed on the inside of the belt.

  • @apache1856
    @apache1856 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good shooting really enjoy it.

    • @hrfunk
      @hrfunk  ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you!

  • @MTB_Pathfinder
    @MTB_Pathfinder 23 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Very good revolver!

  • @crafty714
    @crafty714 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey Chief, If you ever decide to see how much difference there is between (Smith and Wesson) a real 3" barrel vs. The 19 Smith and Wesson Performance Center. I have a 586 L Comp and have always wondered how much difference there is between uncompensated and Comp, barrels??

    • @hrfunk
      @hrfunk  ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks Scott! I am thinking about a video along those lines, but it might be with 4” revolvers. I currently have a 4” 686 and a magnaported 4” 686+. If I get hold of a 3” imported revolver, I could also test it against my Carry Comp. Stay tuned!

  • @SamEEE12
    @SamEEE12 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    10:33, nice shooting!

    • @hrfunk
      @hrfunk  6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Thank you!

  • @hawsshaw
    @hawsshaw 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good review and good shooting👍

    • @hrfunk
      @hrfunk  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you!

  • @intense_pickle
    @intense_pickle 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good lord funk...Where's the rest of ya!? Looking good buddy!

    • @hrfunk
      @hrfunk  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you!

  • @LAWDOGGSD
    @LAWDOGGSD 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Appreciate your video, love the 66....

    • @hrfunk
      @hrfunk  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you, and thanks for watching!

  • @millerman9178
    @millerman9178 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I too have a 66-2 3” just like yours. Again, just like you, I will certainly carry mine as well. Where did you purchase your thumb break holster from?

    • @hrfunk
      @hrfunk  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      I bought it years ago from a local holster maker who was up in years at the time. I haven’t seen him in a long time and I doubt he’s still with us.